Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results
Well, let’s start with the official news from the A’s website:
For the sixth time in less than four seasons Athletics starting pitcher Rich Harden has landed on the disabled list.
Oakland placed the hard-throwing right-hander on the 15-day DL retroactive to April 3 with a mild subscapularis strain in his right shoulder.
The subscapularis muscle is located underneath the shoulder blade and connects to the front of the upper arm. It works in conjunction with a group of muscles that are used to move the rotator cuff and when injured the subscapularis can cause pain while going through a typical throwing motion.
Harden was scheduled to start Saturday in Cleveland, but after experiencing discomfort in his shoulder during a light toss on Wednesday afternoon, the 26-year-old was forced to cancel his bullpen session and as a result his next outing.
"Harden's not going to be making his next start," Oakland manager Bob Geren said. "He's not going to be ready by that point."
The A's are trying to be as cautious as possible with Harden's latest setback and are taking a wait-and-see approach before setting a throwing plan for his rehabilitation.
If I’m perfectly honest, I have been waiting all season for this news to break, which is all the more surprising that it still affects me. I guess the other shoe gets just a little bit heavier when it’s wearing a 0.82 ERA.
From purely a fan standpoint, I think that the annual (and sometimes bi-annual) announcements of Harden’s inevitable trips to the DL are terrible PR for the A’s organization. Every year, the baseball world is sold the party line that the A’s can only really compete if Harden stays healthy as their ace, and from the limited experience we have of Harden, it’s hard to ignore the value that an elite pitcher adds to a team. There are times when we can almost taste a 20 win season, and as Spring Training rolls over into April, somehow we believe that this could be the year that Harden finally stays on the mound.
Of course, as every A’s fan knows all too well, that hope will soon give way to the shattering reality of the moment when Harden pauses on the mound, shakes an arm; grabs his side, winces just enough, and we can write the script from there. Management will announce that Harden is day-to-day, he will be scratched from a start, then put on the DL, and will be lucky to return at all.
In four years, Harden has not deviated from this pattern. At what point is enough simply enough? At what point would we rather start a season with a durable pitcher who will go 16-9 with a reasonable ERA instead of a potential superstar who will go two or three starts before breaking fans’ hearts, upsetting the team, forcing roster moves, requiring medical care, and taking up both salary and space on the bench?
A’s fans should be thrilled with the way the first 10 games have gone thus far. The A’s certainly have shown more flash and flair (or scrappiness and grit, if you prefer) than I thought possible for April, and it looks like we might have some real, young talent in the starting rotation. But instead of looking towards the future, we have to deal yet again with the bitter disappointment of the albatross of a ‘potential’ ace pitcher that never was and probably never will be.
I don’t have a good solution for Harden. I would certainly like to think that he’s as frustrated with his injuries as we are, but aside from wishing people would stop talking about him being hurt (yeah, good luck with that), he’s been fairly mum about the whole thing.
Frankly, it’s the Harden experience that really causes me to question some things about how the A’s handle injury reports; I simply can’t imagine that other fans have such a hard time getting basic information about their team as we do. I’m not asking them to compromise potential trade information (who else but maybe Sabean would believe that Harden is a risk worth taking right now?!), but would it kill them to be a little more forthcoming than they have been? No one who has watched the A’s for more than two minutes ever believed that Harden was ‘day-to-day’, and expecting reasonable people to buy the fact that Harden was a little stiff from a plane flight was all well and good until you put him on the DL for another mysterious injury.
If I am Rich Harden, and I have had multiple, reoccurring, completely mysterious injuries that just don’t happen to show up during MRIs and the like, and I want to continue to play baseball, I am going to do everything I can to accomplish this goal; INCLUDING possible exploratory surgery. The diagnosis of ‘resting until it feels better’ just isn’t working, and I’m not quite sure why it’s still considered a viable fix.
In a somewhat related tangent, the Toronto announcer tonight had an interesting comment regarding Dana Eveland and David Wells.
He said, “You can’t pull fat.”
In the case of David Wells, it was intimated that the reason for his health and his pitching longevity might actually have been the protection of his weight. It has long been suspected that Harden’s frame (like Tim Hudson’s) simply can’t absorb his pitching motion; thus turning him into an injury risk. I am not a doctor; I hold no special insight into Harden’s health, but for the love of this multi-million dollar baseball corporation, can not one single medical professional find a way to officially diagnose Rich Harden?
I don't think A's fans (and the organization itself) are out of line in demanding to know what is actually wrong with Harden. Is it possible to pitch through the injury? How is this injury caused? What can prevent it? Should Harden be pitching at all? For years, we have been fed party lines and incomplete answers, and somehow that's just not good enough this year. If Rich Harden was my employee, I would demand just a little bit more of an explanation than 'it hurts'.
And maybe the bottom line is that the A’s ‘need’ Rich Harden like they ‘need’ Alex Rodriguez; both of them would be great assets to the A’s club, but both are not actually going to play for the A’s. And Beane prepared for this. With the off-season trades restocking the A’s depleted farm system, the A’s appear to be in good shape pitching-wise; replacing Haren with Blanton (who is doing his best to fill the ace role, right down to his lousy run support against other #1 pitchers--hello C.C. tonight!), and with the addition of both Dana Eveland and Greg Smith to the current rotation. There is still talent waiting in the wings; the A’s haven’t touched Gio Gonzalez yet, but you can bet that no one has forgotten him.
I saw both Smith and Eveland at Spring Training this year, and I was very impressed. Obviously, so was the A’s management. I thought both of these players could have made the club out of Spring Training, and as it turned out, they practically did. I could be wrong, but calling up these guys right now does not exactly scream ‘rebuilding’ to me; if the A’s were desperate for a warm body to make a spot start in an injured player’s absence, it seems that they would have gone to one of their ‘league-average-#5’ starters. I found it interesting that despite all the speculation, and the availability of pitchers like Saarloos, the A’s went ahead and pulled the trigger on Smith. Either they are ominously foretelling the severity of a Duchscherer injury, or they think--dare I even say it?--that they might be able to compete--at least give it a shot--in the West.
And who knows? Maybe this time they will get it right. Maybe Harden will be activated right after his DL stint and join the A’s rotation for the rest of a long, fulfilling, productive season.
But I’m never going to count on it again. That dream is over; I’m putting my fandom behind Blanton, Smith, Eveland, Gaudin, and someday Gio, all of whom may never come close to being Rich Harden.
And you know what? I can live with that.
0 recs |
252 comments
Comments
Couldn't agree more
WIth how the Haren and Swisher trades look already, I'd be fine with them giving up Harden for a 35-year old Single A middle reliever...or my aunt, for that matter.
by Eggman on
Apr 11, 2008 9:10 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Consistent
It doesn't take much strain on her arm, so she hasn't spent a day on the DL.
by Eggman on
Apr 11, 2008 9:12 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
this is exactly how i saw it going down...
for the first time in years i didn't actually expect harden to do anything. i've been drafting the guy in fantasy every year thinking this will be the year...but not this year. i've given up. the guy's just not meant to pitch.
i'm excited about all the young arms though and eager to see them get a shot.
anyone at all surprised by how far the payroll has dropped this year? 3rd from last? i'm guessing this has been discussed elsewhere. is this a precurser to a future signing (or two) or are they just saving some money?
by Livermore on
Apr 11, 2008 9:10 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
For now it's mostly in scouting
It looks like the A's have taken the money they're saving in payroll and have diverted it to the scouting budget. We have already seen a number of big money international signings and it has been reported that the A's have a much larger number of scouts on the payroll now. The final step will hopefully be to see them go over slot in the draft this summer.
I'm not sure how soon the A's will begin pumping up the payroll again, probably dependant on how well they do this year. Beane might also be a bit hesitant due to the performance of previous signings.
by DiegoAsFan on
Apr 11, 2008 10:43 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
They're not spending anywhere near as much
on scouting and (yet to come) signing bonuses as they are saving on payroll in 2008, as compared with 2007. Not even close.
There is an A in Whimsy.
by FreeSeatUpgrade on
Apr 11, 2008 10:51 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The payroll dropped by $21 million this year
From $73 million to $52 million. (That includes the subsidy to Atlanta for Mark Kotsay.)
You could run an entire extremely respectable minor league system on $21 million a year. (I'd be surprised, eg, if the Yankees spent this much.) There's no practical way one could expend that much money on increased scouting and signing. You'd be wasting it scouting cricket prospects in Baluchistan by the time you hit the end of that budget.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 11:03 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
but, but...
but maybe if we had the guy in Baluchistan, he could find us a wicked googly bowler to replace Harden!
"Good pitching will always stop good hitting and vice-versa."- Casey Stengel
by Gaijin_Suketto on
Apr 11, 2008 11:25 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I know
Which is why nowhere in my post do I recommend the A's spend the entire payroll savings on scouting, bonuses, the minor leagues, or anything else.
There is an A in Whimsy.
by FreeSeatUpgrade on
Apr 11, 2008 12:46 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I know... just putting the number in perspective.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 1:11 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think you two should definitely have this argument again.
I mean, the Harden thing is just depressing.
And it's pretty clear, as I wallow in a post-Pizza Schmizza / pre-quitting time stupor, unable to fend off the apathy wrought by afternoon sun glinting relentlessly through the window, that I'm not exactly destined to set the world on fire at work this afternoon.
So I've got a few hours to kill, and maybe I'm a masochist but I can't think of anything more entertaining that passing that time watching the ire and hyperbole ratchet steadily upwards until one of you caves and delivers a culminating, expletive-laden rant about profit margins, zoning shenanigans, and scouting in Venezuela.
Does The Dogfather have a Bat Signal or something? How can we get ahold of him? Because he needs to be involved as well.
by 74mk on
Apr 11, 2008 1:31 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
zoning Shenanigans?
Well, they did have to put it way on the outskirts of town.
And what did we do once we discovered a rift in the fourth dimension? We launched a monkey into it. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Apr 11, 2008 1:48 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I won't ask how you conjured up that link
Mine is somewhat more tame.
by 74mk on
Apr 11, 2008 1:55 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I've given up on Harden ever having a season without...
...at least one stint on the DL, and the way the pattern is developing it will include at least one fairly long one.
That is not something a team should try to operate around, especially when Harden has ace stuff.
If he wasn't as good as he is he'd be long gone already, so it's clearly a case of the team hoping - in vain so far - that Harden can somehow not be as fragile as he is.
The problem is, I just don't think anyone who's fragile can ever really get past that for good, especially not a pitcher. We already know the overhand pitching motion is not the natural way to use the body and it puts exceptional strain on the arm, shoulder, etc.
As much as I like Harden, it may be time to stop while they're behind and move on. I'd rather see the A's get something for him instead of playing the "Let's hope he can last more than half a season and give the team something while we rely on others to make up for it while he's out again" game.
It's sad. He's got some of the best stuff I've seen from a young pitcher, but he just cannot hold up to the demands of pitching.
by Flashfire on
Apr 11, 2008 9:11 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm probably going to reply to this several times
so don't panic. There's a lot of stuff here.
In four years, Harden has not deviated from this pattern. At what point is enough simply enough? At what point would we rather start a season with a durable pitcher who will go 16-9 with a reasonable ERA instead of a potential superstar who will go two or three starts before breaking fans’ hearts, upsetting the team, forcing roster moves, requiring medical care, and taking up both salary and space on the bench?
Well, of course you'd rather start the season with this guy. The guy you've described is essentially Dan Haren, or Kelvim Escobar (pre-injury, natch), or Aaron Cook. Do you know of anyone who would trade one of those guys straight up for Rich Harden?
Pitchers like the above are extremely valuable, which is why teams can only acquire them by drafting them, by trading six prospects for them, or by paying them a gazillion dollars a year.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 9:13 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, maybe a little high. I was actually thinking more of Joe Blanton, putting the ERA somewhere in the neighborhood of 4ish.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 9:20 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Blanton's VORP
was about 3 times Harden's last season.
A better comparison would be someone who is passable, but below average-- Kyle Lohse, say. Would you rather start a year with Kyle Lohse or Harden?
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 9:47 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Fair enough
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 9:56 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And to answer my own question, the correct answer is
"Depends on who your #6 and #7 starters are."
Detroit would rather have Kyle Lohse right now. Oakland, weird as it may seem, would rather have Harden, because the back-end of the rotation is pretty stocked with passable arms that can give them a high-4 ERA (DiNardo, Smith, Saarloos, etc.).
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 10:01 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Instead of screwing with the rotation
is it finally time to try the reliever thing? You can't give up on a guy with his talent, but losing a reliever is much less taxing on a team than always having to shuffle the rotation around.
by Sacred#24 on
Apr 11, 2008 9:14 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
That's another thing. I remember Harden being unwilling to try this role. Can anyone confirm that?
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 9:21 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
this is what i found (from June 2007):
The A's host the Cardinals in a three-game Interleague series June 15-17, and while Harden has repeatedly made clear his desire to be a starter despite frequent suggestions that he might be able to stay healthier working out of the bullpen, he's all for working his way back into the rotation while helping cover for the absences of closer Huston Street (elbow nerve) and top setup man Justin Duchscherer (right hip).
"It's something we've talked about," Harden said. "And I think that's a good idea with Justin and Street out. We definitely need some help out there. ... That way I can build up my pitch count.
"It's not like it's permanent."
Asked for his thoughts on the notion that he'd be better off as a full-time reliever, Harden smiled and responded the way a 4-year-old might respond to an unwanted suggestions -- with a tongue-out raspberry: "Phfffft!"
"Everybody's got their theories," he continued. "Whatever."
Geren and assistant general manager David Forst stopped well short of saying a move to the bullpen would be anything more than temporary for Harden, too.
"It's just been talked about," Geren said. "When he's ready to pitch, we'd rather see him here than in a rehab stint. From there we can build him up."
"If he did pitch one inning at a time, it would be toward the end of building him up as a starter," Forst said. "We have a closer. Rich Harden can be our best starter. I wouldn't say it's a shift in philosophy. ... Long-term, we still think this guy's one of the best starters in the league.
"Until he's ready to pitch six or seven innings in a game, we want Rich Harden to pitch for us in any capacity he can."
Added Harden: "Whether it's starting or in the 'pen. I just want to help my team any way I can."
by oakinboston on
Apr 11, 2008 10:25 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
what do people think would happen
if the A's get more serious about the option of having him work from the 'pen, and Harden refuses, saying once his contract runs up, he will leave for a team that wants him as a starter?
Would the A's just let him leave? Would you want the A's to let him leave? I have a feeling this is a question that will polarize people pretty strongly.
by oakinboston on
Apr 11, 2008 10:31 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It will?
Harden will be leaving the A's no later than November 15, 2009, and possibly after this season if he continues to be injury-riddled.
Are there people who object to this? Would anyone actually want to re-sign him at free agent prices to keep doing what he's doing now?
As for the bullpen, if he refuses to pitch, well, you do what the Rays did with Dukes-- put him on the reserved list and keep him there until he changes his mind. Although in Dukes' case, it was changing his mind about the wisdom of impregnating additional women.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 10:40 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If he's not healthy enough to pitch, I don't want him in the bullpen.
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 10:43 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
seems like there are still
some people out there that chasing the dream that is Rich Harden, and unable to give that up. I thought id provide a forum for them (if they do exist)... im with you though.
by oakinboston on
Apr 11, 2008 10:45 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Haha...not to mention..
Sending cell phone messages with just a photo of a gun.....Classy.
Bring back Hammer.
by OaktownPower on
Apr 11, 2008 11:08 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Harden would probably injure himself impregnating a woman
And what did we do once we discovered a rift in the fourth dimension? We launched a monkey into it. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Apr 11, 2008 11:09 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can see the transaction line:
4/11/2008: The Oakland Athletics have placed pitcher Rich Harden on the 60-day disabled list with a sprained penis, and have purchased the contract of pitcher Kazuhito Tadano.
by Dilferules on
Apr 11, 2008 12:24 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks
That quote has always struck me as odd. If you're an elite pitcher, sure, you can demand where you want to pitch. But Harden has done nothing to earn pulling that prima donna stuff...
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 10:34 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What prima donna stuff?
I respect you and your writing, bbg, but this is a tired act to me. How is him preferring to be a starter akin to being a prima donna? If he had said, "They want me to pitch in the 'pen, but I'm a natural starter," then I would agree. I hate how an athlete being candid about their hopes is looked down upon. I'd rather Harden do a "raspberry" about being a full-time reliever than give the company lines that we're so used to reading. But hey, he even gave us the company line:
Added Harden: "Whether it's starting or in the 'pen. I just want to help my team any way I can."
How do we know that relieving will help? Wasn't there all sorts of discussion about how starting is earier on the body when Duke converted?
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 10:42 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Easier on the overall body, as in Dukes case, but look at someone else who has
had arm troubles, like Kerry Wood.
by theblackpearl on
Apr 11, 2008 10:44 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Contrast Harden with Duchscherer for a minute (yes, bad example due to the injury, I know), but up until this year, I honestly had NO idea how very, very badly Duke wanted to be a starter. I knew he preferred it, but I had no idea he craved it every single minute of the day until he was given the chance. Duchscherer really lived the party line, "I want to help my team any way I can" even if that meant sucking it up and taking the no-glamour role of the 8th inning set up guy for years. He knew he was helping the team in the 'pen, and he sucked it up and pitched there.
Harden, on the other hand, who is a lousy starter (and by that I mean he doesn't qualify for even a fraction of the IP needed to have relevent numbers), seems to demand the gold job that other pitchers really crave. Yes, when healthy, Harden is a special starting pitcher, but he's very, VERY unsuccessful in this role. For him to even have an opinion on where he wants to pitch seems awfully high-handed and arrogant to me, considering the circumstances. By the third injury as a SP, this should no longer be his decision, and complaining about being moved to the bullpen is a prima donna tactic. How about pitching more than five games a season before you have an opinion on where you should be to help the team? Because right now, all the 'helping' you've been doing is cheerleading from the bench.
This also stems from this year's Spring Training. I have heard from several sources that Harden kept getting pissed off when people asked about his health. Why WOULDN'T that be the first question out of people's mouths? He hasn't EVER shown that his pitching is a bigger story than his health, and to have the nerve to be annoyed, like people are being UNREASONABLE by considering this factor, is not only stupid, but it comes across really poorly.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 11:03 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Duke's the perfect comparison
We can really see when Duke's hurting (which unfortunately is too often) because his pitching suffers. I get the feeling that he knows when to push through the pain and when he's hurting the team by pitching "hurt." He means it when he says "I'll do whatever the team needs." Harden just knows he's supposed to say that stuff.
by Sacred#24 on
Apr 11, 2008 11:20 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pitching when you're hurt almost always has a negative effect on the team.
If you had a bad back and worked at Home Depot lifting boxes, how would you feel if everybody told you to suck it up and take one for the team? The guy is hurt, for heaven's sake. A muscle that he needs to be healthy to throw is injured. I understand the frustration, but the lynching of Harden has got to stop.
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 11:26 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What if you worked at Home Depot and never worked?
by Sacred#24 on
Apr 11, 2008 11:35 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If you got hurt doing what Home Depot hired you to do, you'd get worker's comp
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on
Apr 11, 2008 1:41 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not sure Home Depot would...
let you take worker's comp six times. Especially if the doctors note says you need 15 days off for a "sore back... um, upper lat... shoulder thing- Due to prolonged plane ride or something"
by Sacred#24 on
Apr 11, 2008 1:55 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Laws vary from state to state, and most employers are complete assholes about this
but ethically, if you get hurt performing work directed by your boss, it's on them and I have no problem with you making them pay for everything you need to heal from the injury they caused directing your work at the workplace.
Oh, and if your boss orders you to go on a 15-hour plane ride, and you end up injured from sitting on that plane for 15 hours, you deserve worker's comp for it. Period.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on
Apr 11, 2008 2:12 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No, former union organizer
Bosses really abuse people in worker's comp situations. In the state I worked in, the boss had to post a list of docs to go to in the case of a claim, and the worker got to choose from that list. But all the docs on the list know who butters their bread (the boss) and so they tend to doubt the workers and give even badly injured people the runaround.
It's really frustrating and sad to see people whose lives are being slowly ruined because their boss just wants them to dry up and blow away after having gotten them injured by having them work in a way that was dangerous.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on
Apr 11, 2008 2:38 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed, but...
all they're asking him to do is pitch every fifth day, how is that dangerous? From the A's point of view their not asking any more from him than anyone else.
I'm surprised that in your position you never ran into someone who was trying to milk the system. I see it at my work all the time.
by Sacred#24 on
Apr 11, 2008 3:37 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The fact that they ask lots of people to do this
is hardly proof that it's not dangerous. Look at the NFL -- with the possible exception of placekickers and punters, every single one of those guys is incurring serious, long-lasting injuries as part of the job.
On people milking the system...there was one guy who was genuinely injured, but the circumstances didn't really justify what he was asking for (IIRC, the boss wanted him on worker's comp or disability, and he wanted to figure out some way to keep working with a bunch of limitations). But generally, I'm just not sympathetic to bosses, especially at big companies. I'd much rather live with a few people "milking the system" than screw over lots and lots of people for the sake of the boss's bottom line.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on
Apr 11, 2008 5:33 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The problem with this is....
that often a few people, "milking the system" end up screwing over every body they work with. I see this all the time, especially in civil service. It's a freaking joke sometimes. There are people who use the workers comp system to take off months each year while their fellow employees are forced to carry their slack. People who use 80 days of sick leave in a year and force others to work overtime to cover their positions.
I appreciate that there are safeguards for people who are injured at work. I'm all for them. But as for the people who abuse the system.....screw them. The thing is, its impossible to fire even the most egregious violators. The rest of us pay for it in increased insurance premiums and taxes. There's no such thing as a free ride. Someone somewhere is paying the freight.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on
Apr 11, 2008 7:30 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think the point he's making
is that we pay far, far more to the egregious violators at the top of the pyramid than the ones at the bottom.
To quote the old Wobbly doggerel,
The bum on the rods is a social flea
who gets an occasional bite.
The bum on the plush is a social leech
blood-sucking day and night!
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 11:42 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nice doggerel
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Apr 12, 2008 1:10 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
{wags tailerel}
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on
Apr 12, 2008 9:18 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Harden ... seems to demand the gold job that other pitchers really crave.
Why wouldn't he choose to start? Do we have any evidence that people are trying to make him anything other than a starter? We have statements from Forst saying that they have no plans on making him a reliever, because he can be the team's best starter. The main reason he was in the 'pen was so that they didn't "waste" his rehab innings. It seems like they wanted to get as much out of him as possible.
For him to even have an opinion on where he wants to pitch seems awfully high-handed and arrogant to me, considering the circumstances.
I think you're reading way too much into his statements. It seems to me that you're just a frustrated fan. If that's the case, I get it. You and PaulThomas seem to have a vendetta against Harden, as though he's trying to screw you guys over personally. I honestly doubt that he wants anything more than to be healthy and pitch. I'm sure he'd even prefer to be a healthy reliever over not getting to play at all. I'm sure he wouldn't mind getting paid premier reliever money instead of broken-down starter money.
I have heard from several sources that Harden kept getting pissed off when people asked about his health.
Again, I think you're jumping to conclusions. I don't know your sources, but I think his statements may be taken out of context. What, exactly, constitutes getting pissed? What did people say? Did they ask him how long he'll stay healthy, or did they ask him how he feels? Either way, it's anecdotal evidence, and I won't believe it.
The bottom line for me in this situation is this: how would I feel if I were in his position? I'd probably be extremely frustrated, and I'd feel like I was not getting the chance to fulfill my potential. It's easy as a fan to say what he should or shouldn't do, but we don't know exactly what he's experiencing physically. And we certainly don't know exactly what the trainers and team management are asking of him. It seems very picky to take statements like the one first referenced here and ascribe all sorts of evil motives to it. I honestly think he's a good guy that just can't catch a break. I'm okay with him being cautious about his health, because it's his life.
Don't get me wrong, I'm as frustrated as any about his inability to stay healthy. It drives me insane. But I gotta give the kid the benefit of the doubt. He's a phenomenal talent who just happens to be made of glass.
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 11:24 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This is the first time I've trashed him...
I've given him the benefit of the doubt for the last 5 trips to the DL. Frustrated fan? You bet!
by Sacred#24 on
Apr 11, 2008 11:29 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's now a "vendetta"
to say that you dislike someone because you think they're a weasel?
Wiktionary:
vendetta (plural vendettas)
A bitter, destructive feud, normally between two families, clans or factions, in which each injury or slaying is revenged; a blood feud
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 11:36 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Perhaps it was a poor choice of words
In light of your definition:
A bitter destructive feud:
1. Harden "offends" you with what he says
2. You think he's a "weasel", so you retaliate by calling him a "weasel" on your forum of choice
You just seem really bitter towards the guy, and I don't exactly get why. I understand the injuries are frustrating. But the things he's said are not even one-tenth as bad as some of the comments that you make.
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 11:48 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Harden's free to come on here and call me a weasel
Can't see why he'd bother, though.
As "insults" go, "weasel" is like preschool-level.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 11:54 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
As "insults" go, "weasel" is like preschool-level.
You said it, not me. :)
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 1:37 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The purpose of me posting here
is not to insult Rich Harden at any level, preschool or otherwise.
If it was, that would indeed be pretty pointless.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 1:49 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Why the "pre-school" name-calling, then?
Why the character assassination? What does it accomplish?
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 1:52 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This is exactly the kind of comment
I would expect from a poopy-head like you.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on
Apr 11, 2008 2:00 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What is this, the existential angst of posting?
What does any of this accomplish?
I state that Harden is a weasel because it is my opinion that, in fact, Harden is a weasel. I've also given various descriptions of why I think he's a weasel. Most people, myself included, like to convince other people that their opinions are correct, whether for intellectual purposes, ego stroking, whatever. I am no different.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 2:00 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You're definitely free to post what you want
But it's hard to agree with your assessment of Harden's character because of the way you go about it. It makes it a lot easier to sympathize with him.
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 2:11 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
JediLeroy you are tripping on this one
I'm with Paul and BBG. Personally, I have been frustrated by Harden for a long time and here we can voice that with other fans, despite whether you enjoy it or not.
by butler19 on
Apr 12, 2008 9:32 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You come to bury James Richard
not to praise him.
"Camelot sure fell apart, didn't it?"-Steve McCatty
by 5Aces on
Apr 11, 2008 2:29 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Read my post last week on Harden's start
You can read any comments/posts over the last four years on Harden's starts.
I have been his biggest champion. No one wanted him to pitch well, and for a whole season more than I have. I have never, up until pretty much this week, have said anything negative about Harden the person, not Harden the pitcher.
But enough is enough. You can not believe my sources; that's your right. But consider what we have all known from basic observation. There wasn't a person on AN who was surprised at the DL news. It's old news. It's old and tired news from a pitcher who just can't stay healthy, yet somehow pretends that that is not the case.
I can pull handfuls of quotes where Harden expresses frustration at being called fragile, saying that he has freak injuries, nothing is related to anything else, bad luck, yadda yadda. He's completely delusional about the severity of his injury(ies) and I for one, am tired of it. It's taken years to get here, but I've had it.
Harden is collecting an absurd amount of money from the A's for work that he isn't doing, and he is in complete denial of how poor of a performance he has given them over his career. I look back at all the comments and they seem RIDICULOUS to me. Talking about where he wants to be in the pitching rotation? Talking about his unhappiness with the suggestion of the 'pen (and I can dig up the sources, but there were conversations for a very long time about moving Rich, not for performance reasons, but solely for health reasons)? Talking about how frustrated he was that everyone kept asking about his injuries?
How about the very simple fact that he is a non-entity on the A's, and has been for years. And maybe it's just me, but him paying lip service to what he plans to do, or what he wants to do on the team is the very tired act.
It is exactly like an employee of mine coming into my office and telling me they want the high-profile sales job, with these days off, and this schedule, and they want to work on this or that; when all the while, I am staring at them, absolutely appalled, because they have shown up for work only twenty days out of the last three hundred. Yet they are getting paid a ridiculous sum of money...well...for doing very little.
And yes, right or wrong, I do think that moves him past 'good guy' and a little into 'weasel' territory.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 11:58 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I just don't think I can make judgments about his character based on anything you provide.
I'm not doubting that you have been a Harden supporter. But you're pretty vocal right now in your opposition (and making character judgments that seem far-fetched based on the evidence).
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 1:31 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree with so much of what you are saying, and yeah, I'm the first to admit I'm probably irrationally angry at Harden. But he HAS made comments about his health; as Blez says below, he publically called out the A's training staff and basically told them that they were incompetent and went to a workout routine himself. That's NOT team-player kind of stuff, and it backfired. He's hurt anyway.
I think monkeyball and others may have a point; that Harden is working out to look good...and I'll be the first one to tell him he has a great body, but if he wants to be a model, fine, but he can't be a baseball player too.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 3:15 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
From ST last year:
By now Rich Harden must wish he could have a T- shirt made, one that informs all inquiring minds that his right arm feels just fine and that he's ready to roll for the regular season.
It's not Harden's style to get snappy with reporters, but he's made the point that he's tired of questions about his current health, whether he can stay healthy and what kind of numbers he'd be capable of posting because of that good health.
He doesn't care to dwell on the past two seasons, in which he's made just 28 starts because of assorted injuries. Nor does he want to forecast the future, which promises tantalizing numbers, if his spring-training performances are any indication.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4176/is_20070325/ai_n18756659
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 12:15 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
None of that changes anything for me
I don't fault him for being tired of all the questions. Your link even states that it's not his style to get snappy. What should he have said?
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 1:27 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I tend to agree
It's got to be really frustrating for Rich, and I've said so elsewhere.
If I was an extremely talented Home Depot stuff-lifter and it was my lifetime dream to lift stuff at Home Depot, I would not LOVE sitting home, watching people lift stuff at Home Depot on tv, and collecting my Worker's Comp. check. I'd be frustrated as all hell.
I was a competitive athlete growing up, and my body could not deal with the stress of my sport (regardless of conditioning) so I had to retire. It was years before I could watch my sport again. YEARS.
The great thing about baseball is that there's a crisis every day. ~Gabe Paul
by 149 on
Apr 11, 2008 2:03 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
In addition
Duke's not the best example, because the team never really saw him as a true starter until recently. Yeah, he got a handful of starts, but it seems the team didn't really know how good he was until he dominated in various relief roles. Only when they lacked rotation depth was he converted to a starter.
Harden, on the other hand, was only put in the reliever role as a rehab assignment. There never seemed to be any indication that they wanted to keep him there. In fact, they mentioned that it was to build up his pitch count so that he could start again. Why shouldn't he want to start if the team's communicated to him that that's what they want from him? I see no evidence that he ever went against the team's wishes in that capacity.
In my mind, this comes down to how you interpret his statements. I see him answering honestly that he'd rather be a starter in the long run. What's wrong with that?
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 11:33 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think she was talking about Greg Smith
Hey, if I wasn't a dreamer Harden wouldn't break my every year.
by Sacred#24 on
Apr 11, 2008 9:21 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Having every year broken sounds better
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 10:25 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hudson, unlike Harden
Has managed to overcome his oblique problem and managed 69 GS through 2006-2007.
I don't know what to do about Harden other then to hope and pray he can get healthy and make 10 consecutive starts so he can build up his trade value and then Beane can deal him.
A lot of people have speculated that maybe with all the injuries the Angels have suffered the A's could sneak in a run at the division this year. Sure, maybe if Harden could stay healthy.
RICH HARDEN WILL NOT STAY HEALTHY AS LONG AS HE WEARS AN OAKLAND UNIFORM!
Forget about contending in 2008. Any player who isn't expected to be on the roster in 2010 is trade bait.
The monster at the end of this blog.
by grover on
Apr 11, 2008 9:23 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
YOUR ALL CAPS PROCLAMATIONS THREATEN MY PRECARIOUS GRIP ON SANITY!
NOW MY BATTERED FANDOM, ALREADY SODDEN WITH RESIGNATION AND CYNICISM, HAS ADOPTED A DISTINCT AND ADVERSARIAL PERSONA, AND IS YELLING AT ME INSIDE MY HEAD!
"Forget about contending in 2008" ... Would you take them at 125:1?
by 74mk on
Apr 11, 2008 10:01 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
How much do you charge
for comments?
I might want to buy some when I can't think of anything to say.
Which is often.
I'm here to talk about the past.
by 67MARQUEZ on
Apr 11, 2008 10:03 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Interestingly,
I'd say Rich Harden makes them a good bet at 125:1.
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on
Apr 11, 2008 10:39 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The truth comes out
ALL CAPS POSTS are how Angels fans are made.
There is an A in Whimsy.
by FreeSeatUpgrade on
Apr 11, 2008 10:53 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I thought if you put a cap on a post ...
... it helped prevent propagation.
And what did we do once we discovered a rift in the fourth dimension? We launched a monkey into it. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Apr 11, 2008 11:10 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Seriously.
That's the thing- Hudson has a problem that the trainers can address and Harden doesn't.
We should get a pool going on what he'll hurt next... I get oblique!
by Sacred#24 on
Apr 11, 2008 9:28 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Dude
The reply button.
Use it.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 9:35 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Now wait just a minute...
"God doesn't pay attention to your cute little hypotheticals." -- Jeff from LL
by oblique on
Apr 11, 2008 10:43 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hahahahaha!!
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 11:04 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It breaks my heart
what's happened to Rich. I don't know if anyone is to blame, or if this is one of those times when bad things happen simply because bad things happen in life.
But I feel for Rich. I really do. And I wish him the best.
Sweating the small stuff
by SportySpice on
Apr 11, 2008 9:32 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Hey
I sent you an e-mail regarding Ken Korach's charity...just a heads-up
I'm here to talk about the past.
by 67MARQUEZ on
Apr 11, 2008 9:36 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't see the email
Did you sent it to sbeck97@gmail.com?
Remember everyone, Ken has started a charity -- the Winning for the Community Foundation -- to raise money for Oakland school baseball programs. Ken is generously donating $100 for every win -- that's $600 so far! -- and has asked others to step up and add to this fund. I suggested in a diary (fanpost) a few days ago that AN collectively make donations for every win, because it's a good cause, and to show our appreciation for Korach.
A bunch of ANr's have committed amounts ranging from 25 cents to $2 per win. But we need more people to join the group. If you'd like to join us and donate, you can email me at sbeck97@gmail. com.
And it's tax deductible.
Sweating the small stuff
by SportySpice on
Apr 11, 2008 9:51 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If I am Rich Harden, and I have had multiple, reoccurring, completely mysterious injuries that just don’t happen to show up during MRIs and the like, and I want to continue to play baseball, I am going to do everything I can to accomplish this goal; INCLUDING possible exploratory surgery. The diagnosis of ‘resting until it feels better’ just isn’t working, and I’m not quite sure why it’s still considered a viable fix.
If' I'm Rich Harden, etc etc, I'd be terrified of exploratory surgery at this point. Why? Because if a problem is found, it would shelve me for 12-18 months, probably resulting in a non-tender and a year of completely lost wages. Better to extract as much money as possible before having it done, because there's no guarantee of any money at all afterwards.
This is apropos of something else, which I didn't really talk about on the other thread but recall mentioning earlier this offseason-- I'm convinced that there is, in fact, structural damage in Harden's shoulder. It's the only way you can explain his mystery pains, his wildly varying velocity, his offseason biceps tendinitis, and his ridiculous injury prone-ness. I didn't think he'd even survive spring training this season; I was rather surprised when he made 2 starts.
I'm still in disbelief that Oakland did not put Harden under the knife after April of 2007. I suspect the actual damage was suffered in April of 2006, but the pattern wasn't fully clear until 2007.
I may think Harden is a jackass, but I'll be the first to tell you that I think the way in which Oakland handled his injuries was about as unbelievably incompetent as anything this side of a medical malpractice lawsuit. Now both he and the team are hung up in this situation in which shoulder surgery will lead to him being shelved for the remainder of his current contract, which neither side wants. So they're both forced to play this charade of pretending his injury is minor and can be rehabbed.
The conflict arises when the A's want him to pitch through pain for long enough for them to unload him on some other desperate team, while Harden wants to avoid this to keep his rate stats up and make sure he doesn't suffer further damage.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 9:34 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Brilliant
That's exactly right. He should have gone under the knife a LONG time ago, but the A's either never made him, or he never agreed. As we know, the A's medical staff certainly has question marks from several situations, and if I owned the A's, I wouldn't have waited until now to address some of these issues.
I didn't think he'd even survive spring training this season; I was rather surprised when he made 2 starts.
Not only that, but he pitched well. How good is he really, if that is with an injured shoulder?
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 9:39 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well, to be sure
the wild swings in velocity on every pitch probably had the Red Sox as confused as the trainers...
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 9:46 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"the only way you can explain"
I think it's a good theory, but it's not the only way to explain the various troubles you identify.
I think Harden simply lifts weights too aggressively. That would certainly help explain all those problems, and could be a compounding/causative factor for your theorized structural damage.
And what did we do once we discovered a rift in the fourth dimension? We launched a monkey into it. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Apr 11, 2008 10:36 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And how is it that the A's don't have a personal trainer on Rich every time he sets foot outside his house? How is it that they let their fragile 'ace' pitcher set his own workout schedule and routine?
It's unbelievable to me that the A's don't know more about what is going on with Harden than they do.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 10:39 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's unbelievable to me that the A's don't know more about what is going on with Harden than they do.
This is actually a good point, but for a different reason. I think they do know more than they let on. Should they just come out and say that he'll never have a healthy season? He'd be impossible to trade if they did.
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 10:55 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm absolutely sure they know more than we do. But judging from the seemingly ridiculous way they have handled his injuries from the get-go, I think they are still missing huge gaping pieces of this mystery.
Exploratory surgery should have been demanded years ago.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 11:05 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Right
If you assume that they know more than they let on, you then have to view their actions in light of the additional information that you assume they have.
Let's go back and assume that the A's knew that Harden had a damaged rotator cuff in April of 2006. OK, well, it's a playoff year so they decide to rehab it. It's not successful the first time and he sprains a ligament in June, but the second time around he's able to come back and pitch at a decent level for the playoffs. Then the season ends and... what? You do nothing at all? No, you start working to fix the problem permanently through surgery.
You can play this same scenario out for them learning about shoulder damage in early 2007, and the result is the same-- it would be in the team's interests to have him undergo surgery so that he can come back in 2008-2009 healthy.
But if you think about the team learning about it in LATE 2007, or early 2008, then the scenario changes. Now the team is totally focused on getting a contender to bite on him because his contract will be up before they can get much use out of him. That means keeping mum about shoulder damage and pretending all injuries are minor.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 11:12 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agree.
But I also think your scenario assumes a lot about the competence of the A's medical staff.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 11:19 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Now the team is totally focused on getting a contender to bite on him because his contract will be up before they can get much use out of him. That means keeping mum about shoulder damage and pretending all injuries are minor.
Bingo. I really think they were crossing their fingers, hoping he'd stay healthy just long enough for someone to bite.
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 11:38 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bingo x2
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 11:59 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think we can agree here
I think there's a great chance that the A's training staff has mishandled Harden. It's certainly possible, especially with the rag tag group they've got (I know they're qualified; they just don't seem to inspire much confidence).
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 11:36 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yep, totally agree. Although there are times I do question the 'qualified' moniker.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 12:03 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
well, to be fair, I'm speculating
When I see pics of Rich deshabille, I instantly think that he spends way too much time pumping iron. But maybe he doesn't -- maybe he's naturally freakishly buff, and his workouts are entirely appropriate.
I think that for a loooooooooooong time (i.e., at least since Alderson's administration), the A's have taken a real hands-off, blinders-on approach to individual players' training regimens. (And I can't imagine why they would have taken that approach.) From Beane's comments this past offseason, that may finally be changing.
And what did we do once we discovered a rift in the fourth dimension? We launched a monkey into it. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Apr 11, 2008 11:15 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the A's have taken a real hands-off, blinders-on approach to individual players' training regimens
And if that dirty little secret is true, then it sure would explain a lot...about everything.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 11:21 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm going to be a nuisance here
Have you seen an elite male gymnast deshabille? An elite male olympic weightlifter deshanbille? Having seen one such specimen, do you believe that they are prone to injuries? Neither population has the time to do Pilates or yoga, and does not do either.
Performing resistance exercises, whether pumping iron, or using your body as the "iron" on a gymnastics apparatus, is not the problem.
The problem is if an athlete is dumb enough to only work the muscles that society considers attractive: Tits and Arms. It's a problem if an athlete spends his time pumping up his T and A on machines.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Apr 11, 2008 2:22 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not a nuisance, imo, I enjoy your input on this subject
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on
Apr 11, 2008 2:24 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Monkeyball, have you ever been in a Turkish prison?
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on
Apr 11, 2008 2:40 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No, but I do like watching gladiator movies
And what did we do once we discovered a rift in the fourth dimension? We launched a monkey into it. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Apr 11, 2008 3:42 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree with mikeA: you're not a nuisance at all
And your input is highly valued and informative.
To be a nuisance myself, is Rich Harden an elite male gymnast? An elite male Olympic weightlifter?
The question isn't, in the abstract, "is a ripped torso conducive to injury?" but "Is the way in which Rich gets ripped conducive to his pitching well?"
He's got awfully nice tits and arms. And it's not as if we read about him doing the NYT Saturday crossword ...
And what did we do once we discovered a rift in the fourth dimension? We launched a monkey into it. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Apr 11, 2008 3:42 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
LIke I said, to Blez below
I don't know. Unless the A's, and Harden, start to release at the very least a sample daily workout that Harden does, there's no way to tell.
I HOPE that Harden is smart enough to consider that he's an ATHLETE, not a MODEL, or bodybuilder.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Apr 13, 2008 1:20 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
PT....
Excellent summary here....Really well said.
Bring back Hammer.
by OaktownPower on
Apr 11, 2008 11:10 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
In other news
The sun rose in the east.
Great read, BBG. But I just don't think this group therapy (at least where Mr. Harden) is concerned is working out for me.
It's a shame, too, because I thought calling by his full name was what the doctor ordered.
Then again, perhaps mentioning "doctor" and "Harden" in the same post is not a great idea.
I'm here to talk about the past.
by 67MARQUEZ on
Apr 11, 2008 9:35 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I guess this means I'm going to fix my broken BobbleRich.
(Cat got up on bobbleshelf a few months ago, demolished BobbleFrank and reparably broke BobbleRich. I decided not to repair BobbleRich for as long as RealRich was healthy, hoping that maybe the cat had transferred the injury demons' attention onto the bobbles instead. No such luck, apparently.)
I'm not surprised at all, but I also can't stop hoping each year will be "the year." That's my weakness (one of many). I also don't think he's malingering, but have no data to back that opinion up. Leave it.
"Huston, you're hot!'' said first baseman Dan Johnson, dressed as a bottle of mustard.
by Poppy on
Apr 11, 2008 9:43 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Plodding Along
From my standpoint they have to give him a chance to come back at this stage. I also think they are being overly cautions due to the track record of nagging injuries that limit his ability.
I'll continue to remain hopeful that this is the year for him.
On the case of calling up Greg Smith has to do with how well Dana Eveland has pitched. If Dana had not blown away a great offensive team then I'd probably have left GSmith down due to the odds that our rotation was only a couple deep. But if we get Duke back (assuming it was only a slight injury) as he pitched great and Gaudin improves then we are looking at a 4 deep rotation at least. You could see it as giving GSmith some time to get comfortable in the majors, but I have to agree that this was Billy being aggressive against the division.
Complicating the decision has to be the Mariners' loss of J.J. Putz and the Angels losing a ton of top shelf starting pitchers. Hell if Billy sees some daylight we always know he's gonna shoot for it.
It's just more exciting with Billy Beane running the team.
by ru155 on
Apr 11, 2008 9:51 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Why is this news?
Please tell the A's to stop posting when Rich is on the DL. It should be news when he is NOT on the DL. He should change his name to Mr. Glass!!
by simeone on
Apr 11, 2008 9:52 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Latest Harden diagnosis
Avian Bone Syndrome.
by boilerdan on
Apr 11, 2008 10:07 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well if he was Mr. Glass he definitely would have been traded by that racist Billy Beane

by theblackpearl on
Apr 11, 2008 10:21 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
damnit i was waiting for crosby's injury for this
"It's like déjà vu all over again." -yogi berra
by Cheezombie on
Apr 11, 2008 1:26 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Glass?
Well, given his playing time, Rich certainly qualifies as a minimalist.

And what did we do once we discovered a rift in the fourth dimension? We launched a monkey into it. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Apr 11, 2008 11:18 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
right on!
"Good pitching will always stop good hitting and vice-versa."- Casey Stengel
by Gaijin_Suketto on
Apr 11, 2008 11:33 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Uncyclopedia
In in in in Soviet Russia in Soviet Russia in Russia Soviet Soviet Soviet Soviet Russia in Russia Russia, Philip Glass Philip Philip Philip Glass Glass listens to listens to you listens to listens to you you you you you listens listens you to you to you.
The candy and the baseball all night long: )
by Englishmajor on
Apr 11, 2008 12:47 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So, Dan Johnson's vestibular problems were caused by Modernism?
And what did we do once we discovered a rift in the fourth dimension? We launched a monkey into it. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Apr 11, 2008 1:04 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Certain modernist "works"
have been known to induce vertigo...
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 1:11 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
DJ got Stendhal Syndrome from reading Moneyball
And what did we do once we discovered a rift in the fourth dimension? We launched a monkey into it. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Apr 11, 2008 1:29 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Harden's already on Phase 4
Phase 5 is up next, and I expect it to be announced in about 2 weeks when he is supposed to be "Ready" to come off the DL.
Soker was completly right when he listed em.
1. We're pushing Harden's next start back a few days.
2. Harden is skipping this start but is expected to take his next turn.
3. His next turn is also being pushed back a few days.
4. We're putting him on the 15-day DL but it's retroactive. He'll only miss two, or at most three, starts.
5. Harden is still experiencing discomfort and is being shut down. Dr. Yocum says there is no structural damage and prescribes rest and rehabilitation.
by Zonis on
Apr 11, 2008 9:57 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Phase 6, of course
is when he comes off the DL, pitches 6 breathtakingly beautiful innings, and we all fall in love again. It lasts one start.
I still believe in Rich, and I don't think he's malingering or hypochondriac, but I also hope for his own sake that he is thinking about what he does with his life beyond baseball.
The candy and the baseball all night long: )
by Englishmajor on
Apr 11, 2008 10:19 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
he has millions of dollars
he doesn't have to think about it
by Zonis on
Apr 11, 2008 10:20 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Gave up on him two years ago...
Harden's done in my book. Quite frankly, I'm not expecting a lot of starts from Duchscherer either. We'll have to make do with a rotation of Blanton, Eveland, Gaudin, Smith and eventually Gio Gonzalez. That rotation ain't bad either.
by uci anteater on
Apr 11, 2008 10:04 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Ok, I'm going on record
Harden misses one start (possibly two) -- comes back and pitches the rest of the season ... he wins 15-18 games.
If I'm wrong, no one remembers. If I'm right, I get to brag "I called it", and the A's shock the world!
I'm a "shock the world" kinda guy.
VacaAsFan
by Vacafan on
Apr 11, 2008 10:07 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe it's time for Rich
to go the Rick Ankiel rout; grab an outfield glove and start shagging flies; grab a bat and take some hacks in the cage and see what happens. He is a hockey player, so swinging shouldnt be too foreign to him. I mean, really, I dont see any reason he should be pitching for Oakland anymore. Can anyone say Mark Prior?
President of the Brent Gates Fan Club
by SoCal As Fan on
Apr 11, 2008 10:29 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Harden should take the "Keith Foulke" approach...
~Realize that he is only hurting his team, and not helping them, by continuing to take up space and salary.
~Retire immediately, thus allowing the A's to move forward without carrying the dead weight that he has become.
~Take a year (or two) off from baseball and have the necessary treatments (surgery, etc) to get himself back to 100%.
~Come back to baseball only if / when his body truly is ready for the physical demands of the position.
Of course...Rich Harden probably does not have the moral conscience that Keith Foulke displayed in making these decisions, but one can hope.
by bradford72 on
Apr 12, 2008 3:30 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
like what the A's are doing with Harden
It'd be great if he were healthy, but he's not. There is a chance - small, but non-zero - that vacafan is right and Harden will be back and be fine. If that happens, the A's struck gold. If not, they haven't lost much.
Plus, this year just doesn't matter much. Nor, frankly, does next year. The A's are targeting 2010 and beyond, as they should. I think the best thing is to try to bring him back, and, if by midseason he's not clearly healthy enough to start 10 games in a row, then you do the exploratory surgery and see what you find. If he's not healthy, you'll almost certainly find something in there. Then, in 12-18 months, you've got a pretty good pitcher. Probably not the Rich Harden we'd like to see, but at least better than Zito.
A few other things strike me here. The first is that it's naive of us to think that the A's should use the injury report to give a full and faithful accounting of injuries. Not only is that illegal without the consent of the patient, it's not good strategy. Living in New England, you get a different perspective by watching He Who Must Not Be Named use the injury report as a competitive weapon plus an opportunity to thumb his nose at the media. That's what it is, so to speak.
The second thing is that, to win a championship, you really want, and maybe need, to have an absolute ace. That's what Harden can be. The good thing is that the ability is clearly undiminished, and there's no apparent permanent debilitating injury at this point. Both are worth celebrating, especially if the A's can get him healthy before 2010, which is the year when it really starts to count.
The third thing is that we should all reserve our judgment. The guy's no wimp - he's a major league pitcher. I've played a sport at a high competitive level - and failed - and I have some understanding of what it takes, and what it means to play through pain. Harden has played through pain; he's only shut down when he had to. No major league pitcher is pain free, and most of them feel like their arms are going to fall off most of the time. There's a difference between hurt and injured; when you can't throw a week after your last start, you're injured. That's where he is now. Let's respect him and the team, be sad for our loss, but be patient and realize that Harden and the A's are handling this in a reasonable way.
My earliest memory in life is of Campy Campaneris
by eastcoasta'sfan on
Apr 11, 2008 10:31 AM PDT
reply
actions
3 recs
hey, good to see i'm not the only a's fan in boston
My earliest memory in life is of Campy Campaneris
by eastcoasta'sfan on
Apr 11, 2008 10:35 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
dude it's tough
been out here for 6 years. seen some painful playoff games.
by oakinboston on
Apr 11, 2008 10:39 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ugh...I can imagine. Althought, to be fair, we've had our share in Oakland.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 10:40 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I coach a little league team and still use their baserunning as an example of what not to do
but I have a great picture of harden's arm angle that I use with my pitchers
My earliest memory in life is of Campy Campaneris
by eastcoasta'sfan on
Apr 11, 2008 10:40 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If that happens, the A's struck gold. If not, they haven't lost much.
Well, except the casual fans who believe the media hype that without Harden, the A's are a losing club yet again. Except the countless hours of rehab hours and medical procedures. Except the trust and goodwill of the fans.
Paul Thomas made a brilliant post earlier in the thread of the mismanagement of this injury. The A's absolutely have not handled this injury in a reasonable way; there should have been action taken long, long ago.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 10:38 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If Paul's right about the injury, then the rest of his post is right
But I've spent enough time in rehab, including alongside some people whose injuries were publicized, to know that it's really hard to judge from the outside what's going on in an injury situation.
I assume that I really don't know what's going on with his injury and am in no position to judge. That being the case, if they really believe that this is a series of unconnected things, the approach seems reasonable.
From a PR perspective, sure, it's been bad. But another thing I've learned in new england is that winning cures just about any PR problem. Heck, HWMNBN is the 2nd most popular man in New England, and the most popular man works for him.
My earliest memory in life is of Campy Campaneris
by eastcoasta'sfan on
Apr 11, 2008 10:44 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Correction
In 12-18 months, someone else has a pretty good pitcher. If you're targeting 2010 and beyond, Harden will not be a relevant factor and it doesn't matter what you do with him, other than hopefully trade him to someone else (which would be ruled out by surgery).
The good thing is that the ability is clearly undiminished
Really. So the velocity swinging from 85-95 MPH on his fastball in his last start was just... what, arm action?
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 10:55 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sub 1.0 ERA vs red sox and indians
small sample, of course, but the red sox announcers were quite clear that they thought they were seeing something excellent.
And my theory of the A's is that they will try to retain Harden if they believe he can be a great pitcher for them.
Of course, I could be wrong on both.
My earliest memory in life is of Campy Campaneris
by eastcoasta'sfan on
Apr 11, 2008 11:33 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So, you are answering "me" to my question above
as to whether anyone would actually want the A's to pay free agent rates to re-sign Rich Harden.
Well, at least it answers the question. I think you're loony, if you in fact do think this, but it's a big world.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 11:45 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think you offer arbitration
and hopes he either bites and you can be brutal in the meeting to get the salary down the max or you let someone else sign him and he's their expensive problem.
In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!
by DMOAS on
Apr 11, 2008 12:04 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't think I'm loony
My answer is probably "me", but it's a qualified "me."
It's a market, and, of course, Harden will go at or near market rate. But the injury factor plays into the market, and the team that holds the current contract and knows the actual medical situation has those two advantages over every other team. Most of them screw it up, of course, but I still trust the A's.
If BIlly think Harden's going to be healthy and effective enough to be an ace, I do believe he'll pay what he has to in order to have an ace, as long as the resources are there and the rest of the team is worthy of an ace (i.e., a healthy harden coupled with the rest of the team makes them championship contenders).
To date, they've risked relatively little and could have a huge payoff. Harden's a gamble, but, given that his talent puts him in the top 10 and, IMO, top 3 of all MLB pitchers if he can be healthy, I still think the gamble has made sense and continues to make sense.
If he were 30 years old and making $10m/year, it'd be a different story, and I'd be 100% with you. And I would not want them spending Santana / Zito kind of money in any case. But the market rate for Harden shouldn't be that high, and a healthy Harden could take us where we haven't been in a long time.
My earliest memory in life is of Campy Campaneris
by eastcoasta'sfan on
Apr 11, 2008 12:05 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If a healthy ace makes you a championship contender,
why on God's green earth would you sign Harden instead of John Lackey?
Signing Harden is not saying "I'm confident that this team can be winners." It's saying "I'm so desperate that I'll stake the season on a 10%, or worse, chance that this guy actually works out." The whole point of the Haren and Swisher trades was to take the A's out of that position, because it's both frustrating and fiscally irresponsible to constantly throw away money on extreme health risks.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 12:26 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
we're probably not being productive at this point
but, sure, I'd rather sign lackey or someone like that. however, those guys aren't available very often, and they're not as good as a healthy Harden could be.
Harden's like the small cap fund in your investment portfolio - most likely to go down, best chance of going up. I think that's all I'm really trying to say.
My earliest memory in life is of Campy Campaneris
by eastcoasta'sfan on
Apr 11, 2008 12:37 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Would you buy a stock
if you knew it was being managed by Russian mafia goons and the company was about to be hit with major SEC violations?
Harden is a terrible investment. That's the entire point of what I'm saying here.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 1:22 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the russian market did well recently . . .
. . . and I'd be willing to bet that companies hit with major sec violations outperformed compliant companies, but that's just a guess.
If you measure the investment in Harden by returns to date, I agree 100%, it's cost them money and a roster spot for almost nothing.
But think of him like an out of the money option, which has a real cost and a likely return of zero. Still has value because of the upside volatility.
If he doesn't get healthy, that doesn't mean the purchase of the option was a bad idea. It may have been part of a reasonable portfolio strategy.
I think we as fans measure it by the return on our emotions, though.
My earliest memory in life is of Campy Campaneris
by eastcoasta'sfan on
Apr 11, 2008 1:35 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
One thing to keep in mind
Roster spot.
With a guy like Harden, you're going to extra issues managing the roster.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Apr 11, 2008 1:26 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
May as well
Send him right to the 60 day DL, send him to Phoenix and ask him to call when he feels he might manage another handful of innings. Oh, and here's a biography of Sandy Koufax to read on the plane.
"If you make up your mind not to be happy, there's no reason why you shouldn't have a fairly good time." -Edith Wharton (The Last Asset)
by Oakville Athletic on
Apr 11, 2008 10:31 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I had a couple of conversations
(very casual, of course) with Rich; first when he had just barely come up in the second half of 2003, then two years later. Both times I was impressed with his lack of pretentiousness. I find it hard to believe that most ballplayers want to contrive injuries -- and that goes doubly for Rich. "Pitching through pain" sounds noble, but if it leads to altering motion -- even unconsciously -- it can lead to more serious injury. Gaudin is lucky he only ended up teaaring his hip labrum due to the pain caused by his toe problem.
That said, I remarked at least two years ago on AN that I suspected there was some physical problem that needed to be corrected (perhaps surgically), and if not I didn't expect him to ever get through a full season....and each season he ends up on the DL even earlier.
by OaklandSi on
Apr 11, 2008 10:52 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't think he's faking; I really don't. But I wonder if he really does have what it takes to be a pitcher. As others have said, pitching can be a painful process, that often the players just have to tough out.
And again, why has no one explored his physical problem? Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like the only proposed solution to his ailments has been 'time off from pitching'.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 11:09 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree it can be painful
But.. so painful that he has to tough out something that shows up on his MRI?
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 11:50 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not all of his injuries have shown up on MRI's...that's part of the reason they're so frustrating.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 12:00 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
MRIs are great
but, just because something does not show up on an MRI, does not mean that it does not exist.
Also, an injury that DOES show up on an MRI, can also sometimes be asymptomatic.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Apr 11, 2008 12:15 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Oh, for sure...wasn't implying that he was making stuff up; I just imagine the frustration in treating something that you can't see.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 12:17 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Again, I apologise.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Apr 11, 2008 12:33 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If it were me, yeah
I've got a couple of bulging disks in my back that, rest, physical therapy and meds have done nothing for. the doctors have ruled out surgery and are out of ideas. at this point, if i were trying to play baseball, i'd do one of two things: 1) tough it out knowing it's going to be very painful, but never better, 2) retire.
In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!
by DMOAS on
Apr 11, 2008 12:07 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The hope is that Rich isn't beyond repair
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 12:09 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
6 times on the DL. Something's wrong. What? No one apparently knows. Now, I'm not saying it's "that time" yet. But he'd/they'd better damn well be thinking about it, even it's only an inkly that gets disgarded the moment it's made.
In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!
by DMOAS on
Apr 11, 2008 12:11 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm sure they think about it.
Heck, I'm sure Rich is truly worried about it.
We know something's wrong with Rich. I'm not willing to telling him to ruin his career, though. Though it can't get much worse, aggravating an injury or retiring would definitely do the trick.
I just had a vision of Rich at the Roman Coliseum, with all the spectators screaming that he fight to the death.
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 12:21 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If I had to guess
and I'm by no means a medical expert on this so nanoscopic grain of salt here, but I think all it is is muscle soreness, normal soreness we all get at times and sometimes it lingers. When it goes away, he, just like we, get new soreness in compensating areas. Something like that, you simply have to deal with and move forward. Severe pain sucks, I can attest to that, but if nothing can be found actually physically wrong (other than soreness), I would have just kept going about my business (and as a former stockboy, trust me, it sucked, but it day-to-day I've learned to manage the pain to the point I can generally move confortably with a 5/6 out of 10 on the painometer). Now, that's definitely is easy for me to say mind you. But if the above really is the case, sitting back and "resting" isn't a career, so there's very little at this point to lose.
In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!
by DMOAS on
Apr 11, 2008 12:29 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I disagree
If I had a bad back (which I do), I'd find a job that didn't require me to constantly lift heavy things (which I did).
How is destroying your body admirable? There are many non-labor jobs in the work force.
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 1:42 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
There in lies the problem and my point
Either A) you accept it and work through it (which I did for a while before they screwed me & a couple of friends over or B) you find something more appropriate for your physical limitations.
You don't C) sit around and do nothing expecting it to "get better" under the false belief that when it did "get better" you'd actually be able to handle the job. Even if my back felt good now (which it doesn't), there's no way in hell I'd go back to a job that puts that kind of stress on it because I'd be working on borrowed time, which is what I'm seeing in Harden. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to be wrong, but if it's not one thing it'll eventually and always be another and I don't think he's faking and of it.
In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!
by DMOAS on
Apr 11, 2008 1:59 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's the reason that Foulke is so admired
He knew he couldn't do the job he was hired for last year so he gave the money back and quite. He did what he had to do to come back and took a contract 1/10 the amount in order to prove himself.
by Sacred#24 on
Apr 11, 2008 2:08 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Exactly.
But to be fair to JediLeroy, it isn't that he's making invalid points on any of this. I actually agree with most/if not all of what he's saying. Just not the overall picture of what's actually taking place (or more appropriately, I'm questioningly the validity of what we're being allowed to see).
In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!
by DMOAS on
Apr 11, 2008 2:31 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pitching with severe pain
is a bad idea.
Even if he doesn't blow something else out, the pain is very likely going to make him, even subconsciously, alter his mechanics.
This is even assuming, that your assertion that it is merely "soreness" is true.
Are you assuming that the A's medical / training staff is truly this incompetent? That they can't tell the difference between soreness and a strain? That they did not have perform any clinical tests, strength tests, flexibility tests, apprehension tests?
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Apr 11, 2008 2:04 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hate to tell you this, but most players, pitchers include, pitch through pain. It's impossible to go through 162 game schedule without doing so. Not that your wrong about your assessment of mechanics or even the danger of doing so. You're absolutely right about that. IF I was right, I'd want him kept on a close watch and take it inning by inning and if at any point he felt it get worse/unbearable for him to stop.
That being said, I question the A's medical staff like a lot of people do. Incompetent? Possibly. That being said, one of the MOST difficult things to assess is what the true level of pain and severity of problems for something like this, especially if an MRI can't conclusively deduce the problem (and often he if it did). Medically, they simply can only guess at the true cause of pain and often, even good doctors are wrong. They can't get into his mind so it's impossible for them to adequately make any judgement if that were/is really the case.
In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!
by DMOAS on
Apr 11, 2008 2:28 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Tell me this,
why would Rich lie about the injury.
Yes, it's possible for him to lie when they're performing the strength / flexibilty / apprehension tests. Why should he do so?
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Apr 11, 2008 3:05 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I've already gone through this on the other thread
If he thinks that the risk from him pitching outweighs what he has to gain from doing so, he may perceive it to be in his best interests to lie to the training staff and exaggerate the pain he is in.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 3:53 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And each time he gets himself "injured"
especially with a shoulder injury, he is cutting into his future earnings even further.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Apr 12, 2008 1:27 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Didn't Harden start pitching in junior college?
(Or at age 18 or so?)
He never went through the normal injury nexus that potential pitchers go through as teenagers.
I'd imagine that these scenarios play out across the country all the time:
A very talented 12 year-old is the best athlete on his Little League team. Naturally, his coach tries him at pitcher...but every time out, the pitcher complains of soreness, or says that he "can't pitch today" for somewhat vague reasons.
Eventually that coach stops asking that kid to pitch. His arm, or perhaps even partly his psyche, can't handle it, and he becomes a shortstop or a rightfielder or something else.
Some variation of this story happens with thousands of prospects during their high school career, or sooner. They are moved off the position by natural selection/survival of the fittest, long before they reach MLB.
Harden never went through this process because he started pitching much later in life than the typical MLB pitcher. He pitched a dominant year of JC, exploded on the minor league scene, and was on the A's practically in the blink of an eye.
If he had started pitching at age 12 he probably would've been a dominant force in youth baseball for 3-4 years, and then had to deal with these woes throughout the rest of his teen years. So his high school coach, frustrated and worried about his future health, would convert him to 1b or another position to preserve his arm but keep his bat in the lineup.
We might've never even heard of him.
"I still say put Jack Cust on some roller skates, arm him with a squeeze tube of epoxy, and let him loose in CF...righteous!" -MRod
by notsellingjeans on
Apr 11, 2008 11:04 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
that's right
he also began playing baseball relatively late, and started out as an outfielder
by OaklandSi on
Apr 11, 2008 11:06 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
good point
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on
Apr 11, 2008 11:15 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
makes sense
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on
Apr 11, 2008 11:32 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
BBG
In a somewhat related tangent, the Toronto announcer tonight had an interesting comment regarding Dana Eveland and David Wells.
He said, "You can’t pull fat."
*Rolls eyes*. Yes, you can't pull fat. Fat also CANNOT DO ANY WORK. Fat is not contractile protein, ie actin and myosin. It cannot move your levers (bones, joints). It cannot generate force. It cannot perform work. It cannot produce power.
The idea that a muscular athlete is "stiff" and prone to muscle pulls IS A MYTH. Male gymnasts are tremendously muscular. They are arguably the one athletic population with the greatest amount of strength-flexibility, flexibility-strength. Olympic weightlifters are tremendously strong and muscular. They are also extremely flexible and not subject to muscle pulls.
Yes, if an athlete has too low an amount of bodyfat, he is more susceptible to injuries. By too low, I mean 2-3%. The only population that has such low bodyfat levels are competitive male professional bodybuilders. 2-3% is the point where face looks like you came out of a concentration camp. It is the point where you can see not only every muscle, but every striation in every muscle. No other athletic population even comes close to those bodyfat levels.
In the case of David Wells, it was intimated that the reason for his health and his pitching longevity might actually have been the protection of his weight. It has long been suspected that Harden’s frame (like Tim Hudson’s) simply can’t absorb his pitching motion; thus turning him into an injury risk. I am not a doctor; I hold no special insight into Harden’s health, but for the love of this multi-million dollar baseball corporation, can not one single medical professional find a way to officially diagnose Rich Harden?
I don't think A's fans (and the organization itself) are out of line in demanding to know what is actually wrong with Harden. Is it possible to pitch through the injury? How is this injury caused? What can prevent it? Should Harden be pitching at all? For years, we have been fed party lines and incomplete answers, and somehow that's just not good enough this year. If Rich Harden was my employee, I would demand just a little bit more of an explanation than 'it hurts'.
I'm not sure it's fair to expect the org to give a press release that is combination of an anatomy lesson, a pitching how to, and a biomechanical guide.
They disclosed that he has a subscapularis strain. Yes, they could disclose more, such as the degree of seriousness of it, but firstly other orgs don't, and secondly it could well be that they themselves are not really sure how serious it is.
How do you know that all Rich Harden said was that "it hurts". Given that they narrowed it down to his subscapularis, I seriously doubt that all he said was "it hurts".
To prevent my post from being worthlessly negative, off the top of my head, some stuff about the subscapularis:
The subscapularis is one of the 4 muscles that comprise the rotator cuff. It's an internal rotator, while the other 3 are external rotators. It helps hold the head of the humerus (upper arm) down, when the shoulder is elevated by the deltoids and supraspinatus as a force couple. A weak / damaged subscapularis can allow the humeral head to upride, sanwiching the the rotator cuff between the humerus (upper arm) and the acromion (a part of the scapula (shoulder blade), the part where the scapula connects with your clavicle (collar bone)). This can lead to muscular erosion and capsular sprain. A nasty cycle of damage / weakening combined with upriding and erosion can develope.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Apr 11, 2008 11:08 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The idea that a muscular athlete is "stiff" and prone to muscle pulls IS A MYTH.
I never said that athletic players are prone to muscle pulls. I also never said that fat players stay healthier than their more in-shape counterparts. I was simply was repeating what Toronto's announcers said about Wells' career. I qualified that by saying that I had no idea what any of that meant.
Thank you for the clarificaton.
All I was saying was the POSSIBILITY (and it's been tossed around by more than just laymen) of Harden's frame being unable to support his pitching motion.
And the "it hurts" was somewhat tongue-in-cheek, borne of the frustration of repeating this exact scenario for years.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 11:14 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
BBG I apologise
I knew that you were quoting the Toronto guys. I thought that you believed it too.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Apr 11, 2008 11:45 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No prob
No, I really don't. There are more athletes in great shape that disprove this out of hand, but I really can see how people think that Rich's body structure may have something to do with his injuries.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 12:01 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What underlying structural damage could cause this?
He's had shoulder, elbow, and back problems, not to mention the left shoulder surgery. If there was structural damage would it manifest its self this way?
by Sacred#24 on
Apr 11, 2008 11:10 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Pitching injuries frequently have a cascading effect
where damage to one area causes a reaction by the body which distorts the normal motion and damages another area.
Something like a partially torn labrum could easily induce the succession of subsequent injuries that Harden has sustained.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 11:20 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Enough is not enough
It is in both the A's and Harden's interest to see if he can start. We don't need bullpen help. We have plenty of innings-eaters. We don't have an ace.
I hope the A's are investigating their injury problems, but there is such a thing as randomness. As hard as it is to accept when it's happening to you, sometimes things just happen.
I work in healthcare, and medication therapy is all about playing small percentages over and over to maximize benefits. Sometimes it's hard for patients to understand that we don't always know the best answer for an individual, just a population. It's hard to exercise patience when you want a hard and fast answer, but wildly jumping from one therapy to another is not a helpful reaction. Likewise, sometimes you have to wait patiently while a player either grows into their potential or flames out. You're happy when they hit their potential, but sometimes you just have to accept that people are going to flame out and there's nothing you could have done.
It's normal to be concerned. It's normal to be frustrated, but sometimes even the best decisions just don't work out.
by MrIncognito on
Apr 11, 2008 11:12 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I really hate this game of
judging the players' character by their various comments to the media that trickle out every now and then, because:
1. They're really not much to go on at all (less to go on really than "my friend heard player X is an asshole or something like that). I hate the similar game of rushing to quote output machine to see if a reliever who's blown a game is sufficiently apologetic and sufficiently understands the full extent of his talentlessness; and
2. Really, who gives a fuck?
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on
Apr 11, 2008 11:36 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't care about what Rich has said to the media
But his smirk makes me dislike him.
And what did we do once we discovered a rift in the fourth dimension? We launched a monkey into it. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Apr 11, 2008 11:45 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If he was smirking and thinking
"I'm taking millions from the A's and I don't even have to pitch!" that would sort of make me like him more, as sort of an incorrigible rogue.
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on
Apr 11, 2008 11:47 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So, you're a member of the Carl Pavano Fan Club?
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 11:51 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So, you're a member of the Ahmed Chalabi Fan Club?
And what did we do once we discovered a rift in the fourth dimension? We launched a monkey into it. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Apr 11, 2008 12:21 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No, unfortunately,
he gave me a suitcase full of Darics but they're doing even worse than the dollar.
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on
Apr 11, 2008 12:26 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
At least he has a Curveball
The candy and the baseball all night long: )
by Englishmajor on
Apr 11, 2008 12:43 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
I still say that was Zito
And what did we do once we discovered a rift in the fourth dimension? We launched a monkey into it. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Apr 11, 2008 12:57 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
An oft-injured Bobby Kielty purported "stole money"
As teased by Billy Beane...according to the reliable, unbiased report supplied by Milton Bradley.
I am Ray Fosse's man crushes for Clay Wood and Jason Kendall.
by franks a lot on
Apr 11, 2008 12:34 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Greatest Smirker in Baseball?
Joe Randa or Rich Harden?
I am Ray Fosse's man crushes for Clay Wood and Jason Kendall.
by franks a lot on
Apr 11, 2008 12:54 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
with a name like "Smirkers" ...
And what did we do once we discovered a rift in the fourth dimension? We launched a monkey into it. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Apr 11, 2008 12:57 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
In other places and eras,
Harden would be forced to pitch. In Japan, where pitchers often throw 100 pitches a day, begging off when you can perform in pain is unacceptable. In fact, a Japanese club would pitch him whether he hurt or not to find out if the injury was going to get worse, or see if he would still be effective through the pain. If he tore something bad and had to get surgery, so be it, as long as he served his club honorably as long as he could.
Before the strength of MLBPA, he'd have to pitch every five days, or he'd be farmed out or released. Clubs called people like Harden "Malingerers" and often would put them in the lineup hurt out of spite, to either drive them to perform or see enough of a sample that a person couldn't play hurt so they could bring someone else up to replace him.
I wonder... if the A's said, "We're not DL'ing you, so get your ass on the mound for your next start whether you hurt or not!" , could Harden file a grievance, or would he be forced to get out there and pitch?
If we're truly looking at a scenario where Harden is going to be shut down for most of the rest of his time with the A's, then go somewhere as a free agent, we might as well make him pitch until his arm falls off, so that way, at least we know we'll never be facing him healthy in another uniform in 2-3 years...
"Good pitching will always stop good hitting and vice-versa."- Casey Stengel
by Gaijin_Suketto on
Apr 11, 2008 11:45 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
On topic drawing of Yuko Mishima

The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on
Apr 11, 2008 11:51 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Best. Failed. Coup. EVER.
And what did we do once we discovered a rift in the fourth dimension? We launched a monkey into it. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Apr 11, 2008 12:22 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Putting aside questions of ethics and morality,
if the A's ever did such a thing, they would destroy their reputation.
They would have to pay a premium when they want to sign pitchers, including, yes, draft picks.
Furthermore, doing this would not only hurt them in the eyes of pitchers. It would make GMs leery of giving up good prospects when trading for A's pitchers.
"Before the strength of MLBPA, he'd have to pitch every five days, or he'd be farmed out or released. Clubs called people like Harden "Malingerers" and often would put them in the lineup hurt out of spite, to either drive them to perform or see enough of a sample that a person couldn't play hurt so they could bring someone else up to replace him."
You are making a very good case for the MLBPA. Maybe they should hire you for their PA department.
Would you like it if you got injured while performing your job, and was called a "malingerer" and was forced to perform acts that you get you even more injured?
Or do athletes not count, simply because they are paid a lot of money to entertain us?
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Apr 11, 2008 11:52 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Stay level-headed AN
About Harden as well as the A's organization. Agree, both of them are bullshit, but as avid fantasy baseball player I know that the A's are not the only organization to downplay the flow of information when it comes to injuries, for instance just recently many fantasy players could be heard complaining how the Atlanta Braves downplayed Rafael Soriano's injuries yet again as he begins another stint on the DL.
With Harden, I really don't know his minor league, pre-minor league history, but I'm pretty sure that if he got to the majors he did so with a mostly clean bill of health over those years leading up to the show. Either he has done something to his body that has ruined him for good and he is in denial about it, or he hasn't, and he is just prone to injuries, and maybe unlucky.
I fully believe Harden is the latter, mostly extremely prone to injuries. It appears as though his body just cannot handle the wear and tear of every fifth day. Maybe every 10th day would be a smarter idea, but pride and tradition beg to differ. I know we can't trust the A's PR, but this injury isn't as serious as others in the past, Harden will pitch more this year.
by ChadGod on
Apr 11, 2008 11:57 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
But on the bright side...
WE'RE STILL TIED FOR FIRST!!!!!
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 12:08 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Amen to that.
Let's enjoy it while it lasts. Eveland's going to be decent this year, but I don't know if he keeps up what he's been doing. A healthy Harden and Duke would make this a much better team. But so would a bunch of angels and unicorns.
Chiba Lotte lost simultaneously in the fighter plane of the Japanese ham.
by JediLeroy on
Apr 11, 2008 12:11 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hahahaha...we do have a unicorn.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 12:17 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How come the only times ESPN.com has an article on
the A's, it is the bad news part.
When it comes to Rich Harden, Billy Beane and Co., the Oakland A's have a little Soviet-style Politburo in them. The selective release of information day-by-day is straight out of the "common cold" that felled Yuri Andropov. One day it's the sniffles, the next day it's Konstantin Chernenko drinking vodka shooters in the Kremlin.
http://games.espn.go.com/frontpage/outOfTheBox?page=ootb080411
by theblackpearl on
Apr 11, 2008 12:37 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm sorry, but
dissing the A's or not, that was hilarious.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 1:31 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And, needless to say, they've covered dana eveland as well as johnny cueto
because, after all, an 0.68 era vs toronto and cleveland is not quite as good as 2.03 vs milwaukee and arizona
My earliest memory in life is of Campy Campaneris
by eastcoasta'sfan on
Apr 11, 2008 12:42 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I was really disappointed in BBG and PT initially
since I admire BBG as a fan and writer, and PT is a fellow Sagehen. I still don't get the character assassination but I sort of understand the frustration. The source of it seems to be having expectations of health in the first place.
Coming into the season I had penciled in two rotations:
Beginning of Year -- Blanton, Harden, Duchscherer, Eveland, Gaudin
End of Year -- Eveland, Smith, Gonzalez, Simmons, Gaudin/Lenny/Saarloos/Blanton Bounty/Street Bounty
I assumed Blanton would be traded and Duke and Harden wouldn't last. As far as I'm concerned the only part that hasn't come true so far is Blanton hasn't been traded yet.
I still have high hopes for the team in a weak division and pretty good bets in Gonzalez and Simmons and whatever Blanton (and Street) bring back.
Players with injuries like Harden, Duke (and Chavez and Calero) usually don't come back as their former selves. If they do it's a bonus, but you can't expect it.
by WaddellCanseco on
Apr 11, 2008 1:18 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Dunno what the season series was this year...
but we frigging dominated you guys when I was there. Of the 12 basketball/football games, I think we won at least 8 or 9...
Wear it.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 1:54 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What year you graduate?
Bring back Hammer.
by OaktownPower on
Apr 11, 2008 1:57 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
'06
You could probably look it up, I'm just too busy railing about Harden's rodential attributes to bother right now.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 2:02 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ah, you are a baby...
97 Claremont here.
Bring back Hammer.
by OaktownPower on
Apr 11, 2008 2:06 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nah, it's not expectations of health
I didn't think that he'd even make it through spring, to be honest.
It really is just personal dislike on my part, coupled with a fair amount of sarcastic black humor.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Apr 11, 2008 1:56 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think the most relevant thing out of this
outstanding piece (nice work, BBG!) is the fact that I think that Harden's body simply isn't built to throw the ball as hard as he does. Look, pitching is an unnatural motion as is, then you throw in someone Harden's size and he's hitting 98 on the gun, something has got to give. People like Blanton, David Wells, Dana Eveland and even the more scrawny and lean Zito are better built for it than a compact, muscular frame like Harden. I've met him several times in person and he's just ripped. That's good for playing defense in hockey and linebacker in football, but not so good for pitching in the major leagues. I would imagine the muscles have to affect the range of motion when they're too large.
Harden is a superior talent, but I think that superior talent was locked inside a glass box and the only way for him to get it out is to break off little pieces of the glass. I'm just as frustrated as everyone here just because it honestly seemed like this year, Harden was going to be different. He went on a press effort to basically say the A's forced him to pitch when he wasn't ready last year and it was their fault he was so injured and that he was going to "do things his way from now on". He implied he was going to be healthier because of it. Well, you can't blame the A's for this one.
As for the A's representing it as only something minor from the plane flight, I wouldn't doubt if that's what Harden had told them. And since it's a pulled muscle, the medical professionals aren't going to be able to confirm or deny it. They have to rely on what Harden tells them.
I'm just tired of this being a story each and every year. I'm tired of waiting for this guy to carry our team. He could be the second coming of Cy Young, but none of us would ever know it.
That's OK. I wasn't counting on having Harden all year because I did think if he was finally healthy, the A's were going to deal him for a boatload of prospects. I hope he at least gets healthy enough to allow the A's to make that happen and in the meantime, I'll enjoy Eveland and Smith.
by Blez on
Apr 11, 2008 1:34 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Amen...thanks Blez.
So, bring on Bonds! Or, not... then, bring back Langerhans!! -One won lost one
by baseballgirl on
Apr 11, 2008 1:58 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
prescription for a new offseason regimen for Rich
No mirrors.
And what did we do once we discovered a rift in the fourth dimension? We launched a monkey into it. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Apr 11, 2008 2:08 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
OK
The idea that a muscular athlete is "stiff", inflexible and prone to muscle pulls IS A MYTH. Male gymnasts are tremendously muscular. They are arguably the one athletic population with the greatest amount of strength-flexibility, flexibility-strength of any human population. Olympic weightlifters are tremendously strong and muscular. They are also extremely flexible and not subject to muscle pulls. Many olympic weightlifters can perform full splits, both to the sides and front and back, for example.
Yes, if an athlete has too low an amount of bodyfat, he is more susceptible to injuries. By too low, I mean 2-3%. The only population that has such low bodyfat levels are competitive male professional bodybuilders before a competition. 2-3% is the point where face looks like you came out of a concentration camp. It is the point where you can see not only every muscle, but every striation in every muscle. No other athletic population even comes close to those bodyfat levels. Even competitive male bodybuilders are not at those levels, away from competition.
"I would imagine the muscles have to affect the range of motion when they're too large."
Theoretically possible. But Harden is nowhere at the point where his muscles are "too large".
Generally, the STRONGER a muscle, the LESS it is subject to pulls.
Also, a SIGNIFICANT part of flexibility is the NEURAL system. NOT soft tissue like muscle. The neural system controls whether your muscles relax. Or not.
Being big and strong does NOT result in inflexibility / imbalance, injuries.
Being dumb enough to work only certain muscles, through certain motions, principally on machines, yes, that can lead to "imbalance" and injuries.
"And since it's a pulled muscle, the medical professionals aren't going to be able to confirm or deny it. They have to rely on what Harden tells them."
A pull / strain is just a minor tear. If the tear is serious enough, it will show up on an MRI. Even not, there are strength / flexibility / apprehension tests. This is not a case of simply relying completely on what Harden tells them.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Apr 11, 2008 2:15 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was talking about the muscles on such a small package. I've stood next to Harden before and I was taller than him (although I'm a lot closer to Wells body than Harden's that's for sure). He's such a compact and muscular package that I'm not sure that it works FOR BASEBALL. I'm not saying that people can't be muscular and athletic, but the freedom of range to throw a pitch has to somehow be affected when someone is so big. I've seen Harden in his street clothes and he is freaking huge. If his muscles are so strong, how come he keeps tearing them? I mean, everything you're saying makes sense, but he is countering everything you said with a real life example.
by Blez on
Apr 11, 2008 2:42 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Let him do gymnastics
The dude is clearly playing the wrong sport. Gymnastics, figure skating, or curling would be more appropriate.
by FarkeyD on
Apr 11, 2008 2:50 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Just because you've seen Harden in the locker room
doesn't give you the right to tell all of us how small his "package" is.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on
Apr 11, 2008 3:01 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Like I said,
Being dumb enough to work only certain muscles, through certain motions, principally on machines, yes, that can lead to "imbalance" and injuries.
The problem is not size per se. Or strength. The problem is how an athlete might train. What exercises he does. What muscles he trains. Whether he gets proper food and rest. Whether he gets massages, takes saunas, ices himself, etc.
"'I'm not saying that people can't be muscular and athletic, but the freedom of range to throw a pitch has to somehow be affected when someone is so big."
Have you ever seen an olympic weightlifter at the bottom of a full squat snatch? Or a male gymnast performing an iron cross? They're big, freaking strong and freaking flexible.
"If his muscles are so strong, how come he keeps tearing them?"
I'm not saying his muscles are strong. I DO NOT KNOW. If his muscles are strong I don't want to turn all my posts into posts on sports science, but people often focus too much on muscles, and too little on the neural system. The neural system also plays a huge part in strength and flexibility. Size is not the same as strength.
Training for size does not equal to training for strength. In layman's terms, compare an olympic weightlifter with a bodybuilder. The weightlifter trains for strength, the bodybuilder for size.
I've no idea how Rich Harden trains. Or whether he eats properly. Or he does everything to make sure he recovers, things like getting enough sleep, instead of partying away, getting massages, saunas, icing himself, etc. What I'm trying to say, is that, unless you know at least some of this, it's not possible to come to any informed opinion.
Maybe the next time Beane agrees to an interview, you should ask him about how much the A's monitor their players' training, and some of the things they do.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Apr 11, 2008 3:03 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Beane answered a lot of those questions last time
in essence, it's really hard for the club to monitor their players because they all have their own "people". And the union essentially makes it nearly impossible for clubs to impose certain regimens on them. It's totally optional and a lot of players go their own direction these days.
by Blez on


