Sentimental Oakland Nostalgia Apropos of Nothing
I went with my grandparents to my first A's game in 1970. Uma (my grandma) was born in Louisiana and so was that Blue boy - and she had my grandfather take us to games to see him. She never learned to drive, so as my love for the game grew, we would catch the 57C to the Coli. for summer afternoon games whilst my grandfather worked as a foreman at that Emeryville machine shop where he worked for 36 years. The same grandmother who was shocked and offended when, one day in the 2nd deck overlooking 3rd base, I (mis)pronounced Jesus Alou's first name as one would the son of God. I still remember her sharp, hushed correction.
I was forever hooked when Joe Rudi made that catch at the wall in the '72 Series. To my 8 year old eyes, that was gonna be a game losing home run fa sho’. But, then again, don't they all look like HR's when you're 8?
My passion for the Oakland A's takes me right back to those days - Oakland in the mid-'70's: Hoping for the green Campy bat on bat day, the beach at Lake Merritt, Flint's on San Pablo, the smell of the sourdough factory. The Swingin’ A's, Raiders, and Warriors – underdogs all. And my grandmother.
Soon enough, I was 12. Old enough to catch the 57C to the Coliseum all by myself. Unfortunately, it was 1976 and the A's & Warriors were about to get bad. Real bad. Really, really bad. I got to see lots of bad teams, up close & personal. With a few thousand - a very few thousand - of my closest friends.
But, most of all, I love the A's because they're Oakland. That then Oakland, and this now Oakland. Still underfunded, underappreciated, all-inclusive, and (r)evolutionary. And with a chip on its shoulder for its "San-a-fisco" rivals.
I live 89 miles away from the Coliseum now, but my wife and I make most weekend games. Get there when the gates open, and sit in Section 139 with the rest of our baseball family. That reference may sound cornily like that Drew Barrymore movie, but a bunch of folks from our baseball family came to our wedding in Jamaica. That’s family. We laze around in the sun, snack on lemonade (and Swiss chocolates when we’re lucky) while rueing the loss of the fish sandwich, and watch the pitch movement from over the pitchers shoulder. Best value in baseball. We have the same rituals game after game - "<insert outfielder name> say Hi buddy" and betting on the dot race; waving the A's flag, and heckling the opposing outfielder - after Torii Hunter's ill-fated playoff dive: "If Torii's spelled with two I's, how come you cain't see?" Even he had to laugh.
We get down to Anaheim for one series a year, and inflame the OC crowd. It's always great good fun despite getting pelted with peanuts. It was so bad one game, sitting in the first row behind Vlad, that I just stood up, turned round and let ‘em have at me. I ended up with a couple of unopened bags for the next day’s game.
But, my favorite place to visit is Big Phone. Had a ball waving the A’s flag behind their plate last year. Larry Baer – irritatedly bumping into my flag as he passed by - asking me how I got those seats. His reply: "You’re Bleacher Dave – I’ve left seats for you before!" Thanks, Larry. Must have been him that sent the guy in the Seal costume to try and jack me for my flag. Jacked by a seal? No way.
Isn’t it Ray Ratto that’s responsible for this fiction about the Coliseum’s "lost view of the Oakland hills?" One column from him and that became the oft-parroted but never analyzed knock on the new Coliseum. Hasn’t anyone noticed that the best view of the hills was from the press box? Who cares! View of the Hills? Anyone who remembers that view knows that its most prominent feature was the rock quarry at the top of Edwards Ave – a huge scar upon Mother Nature’s bosom. I gotta think most folk were there for the games, not the view nor the architecture. But, I bet any new A’s stadium includes a really nice press box.
OK, Mt. Davis is horrendous – I agree. But, for us, the fans who sit in the open air, Mt. Davis has brought some benefits. It’s blocked some of the wind that made it so frigid and made it actually possible to hit HR’s at night. Besides, from where I sit, my back’s to that behemoth.
I won’t buy into the "carpetbagger" phraseology of the OAFC, but these are some of the reasons why the "A’s to Fremont" sickens me. It’s completely rational for Wolff and Baby Gap to want to add to their fortunes. I get that, and can’t knock them for it. What I don’t get, is why so many fans are rooting for the owners pocketbooks instead of their own.
As it is now, it’s easy to park, tickets are cheap and available, concession lines are short, and the team is just coming off a great run. For a baseball fan, what’s not to like? High prices and crowds are great for the owners pockets, but not so great for the fans pockets – so why are folks so eager to pay more?
Are we so eager to be like Big Phone – The Place To Be Seen? A high-priced happening where folks eat garlic fries between phone calls and hope to get erased?
For me, the Coliseum represents the Oakland I loved. It’s taco trucks instead of tapas, Lake Merritt rather than the Embarcadero, Bay Bridge not Golden Gate.
Forget the Elephant, bring back the mule. And the 57C.
11 recs |
44 comments
Comments
Great post!
I was "eight in '72" as well! Jumped on the bandwagon with ya.
VacaAsFan
by Vacafan on Mar 9, 2008 3:31 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Right on, BD!
I, too, caught the 57C (from 40th and Broadway) in the early 70's and we'd always sit up in front to hear the pre- and post-game shows playing on the bus drivers' radios.
Cactus
by Ice Cream on Mar 9, 2008 3:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
These are the type of posts that I
appreciate the most from folks who are opposed to the move. It truly is ridiculous that we would root against our own self interests for the benefit of rather wealthy owners. I really enjoy hearing the emotional ties that run back for such a long period of time. I really enjoy the A's history of "blue collar" ties.
In the end though....it's inevitable. Time changes everything, and the forces that are responsible for this change are glacial....and not to be denied. Sadly, it's just the way it is. On my first trip to Fremont, I will lift a beer in remembrance of the Oakland die-hards and for the fight that they were doomed to lose from the beginning. If I can afford it.
Dave and FSU make the best pro-Oakland arguments.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on Mar 9, 2008 4:39 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
All I know is that
On my first trip to Fremont, im gonna start a "Lets go Oakland chant" that will be heard all the way back to the parking lot at the Coliseum....
"I Will Not Relent, I Am Driven"... Clutch
Bring Back The Bash!!!
by Shippee33 on Mar 9, 2008 4:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I love Oakland so much
and that's why it's going to be so disappointing to me when they leave, even if I recognize that it's going to be good for the organization. It's a bitch, quite frankly.
So it goes.
by jeepers on Mar 9, 2008 6:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
On the subject of the A's....
my son's first little league coach called today to give out practice information. His team is the A's (mini-minors division)! It's enough to bring a tear to dear old dad's eye.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on Mar 9, 2008 8:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
He's going to look darling in the A's uni.
Alox...I hope that you will post a pic of him.
by IM4Oakgal on Mar 9, 2008 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I can figure out how...
I most certainly will. As of now his skinny little six year old frame is puffed up....while telling his sisters how much the Yankee's suck.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on Mar 9, 2008 9:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is so cute.
Moments like that are the ones that you will never forget as a parent. My youngest daughter developed a liking for the Atlanta Braves. I remember her first year of softball we got a call from the Coach saying that she had been "drafted" onto the Rockies. When we told her...she yelled" The Rockies! They SUCK!"
by IM4Oakgal on Mar 9, 2008 9:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But will you insist
that he wear the white shoes?
Winner of the 2008 "find grover a new sig" contest.
by 5Aces on Mar 10, 2008 10:00 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am going to miss the Coli very very much.
If you think about it the A's have always acted like they were one foot out the door...and on their way to somewhere else. Haas was an owner who tried to make a lasting imprint on the community but those that came after him kinda erased all of that. The remodel of the park for the Raiders destroyed the attempt to make it a great game experience for the fans. Maybe at Cisco they will work on linking the past to the present. I saw on another thread people lamenting Rickey and Carney working for other organizations. Now maybe they can work on keeping our players here and our retired players in the org. That's the positive about Cisco.
The negative is that we lose the easy access to the park and we have to take on the Yuppie casual fan types only there for the fun day and not there as avid fans. That's going to suck.
by IM4Oakgal on Mar 9, 2008 9:39 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
you got it right
when my friends ask me why i don't want a new park, i give the same reasons you do. i know people who are huge giants fans but only end up going to a few games each year (esp. when that team is half decent) because it takes so much effort and money to get tickets. where else but oakland would i have been able to go to so many weekday afternoon games with my dad in the summers growing up, and then with my friends through jr. high and highschool, while still finding time to take in a few with my dad. when the a's leave behind the coliseum, they will leave with them my memories of joy, dissapointment, friends, and family. one of my most cherished memories to this day is myself and several friends scoring tickets to the 20th consecutive victory in 2002 when we were in 7th grade, convincing one of our dads to come with us, and experiencing that moment with some great friends i will keep for life. I hope the team never leaves the coliseum, let alone oakland, but i'm afraid in this era, with even the yankees moving, fans must grow accustomed to holding their memories within themselves without the physical reminder.
by MaineAthletic on Mar 9, 2008 10:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Why am I rooting for the owners' pocketbooks?
Well, I'm not. If they make money but don't spend it on the team, I'm not happy. If they lose money by spending it on the team, I'm happy. But since increased revenue and increased payroll seem to go somewhat together... kind of...
Well, the basic answer is that I go to like 3 games a year at most, and usually watch the team on TV. So I'd rather watch a better team on television than a worse one. If moving to Fremont will make the team better, I'll accept paying extra on the very rare occasions I actually make it to the ballpark.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Mar 9, 2008 11:23 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes, but.......
The tie between increased payroll and increased winning is nebulous. Last time I checked, the A's are just coming off a run, and the farm has been re-stocked for the next one. Would increased payroll disrupt this cycle by making it possible to avoid the "hard choices."
Would the last few years, and the next few years, have been/will be better if the A's were saddled with the mega-contracts of aged superstars Giambi & Tejada? How many wins would Mark Mulder have racked up for the green and gold over the last few seasons?
Personally, I've enjoyed Eric Chavez work tremendously over the years - was that a good signing?
Would the A's be better poised for the future with Haren and Swisher or with the prospects brought in return?
Big contracts bring big risks, and may allow you to be more sentimental and less disciplined in personnel decisions. I'm thinking that what the A's have been doing works - why mess with success?
by BleacherDave on Mar 10, 2008 6:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sorry, but you are never going to convince me
that having more money available is going to make the team worse.
In the absolute worst-case scenario, which is that all of the potential spending acquisitions would actually lower the team's winning percentage, you bank the coin and wait for next year.
In any event, I will again point out that mid-payroll teams like the Cardinals (which is roughly the level of revenue I expect the A's to rise to post-Fremont) have to make tough choices and decline to re-sign players all the time. Marquis, Suppan, Morris... they've let a ton of guys go.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Mar 10, 2008 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mid-payroll teams......
you mean like the A's! The hometown side is about as mid-payroll as you can get.
by BleacherDave on Mar 10, 2008 9:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uh
No.
The team maxed out its expenditures on the major league team last season to the virtual exclusion of anything else, and still didn't break the upper 50% of clubs. This year it will be in the bottom 25%, as it was for most of the decade.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Mar 11, 2008 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hate to quibble....
but I can't resist. 30 MLB teams mean lower than 23rd = bottom 25%. A's have been there 3 times this decade: '00 - 24th, '01 - 29th, '02 - 27th. I still grin wistfully thinking of the LF bleachers in August '01. Pom Pom Guy IT'S ON!!! Memories of that summer are why I go to games.
17th in payroll last year. I consider that mid-payroll - you don't. Fair enough, it';s an arbitrary distinction.
Don't believe the hype!
by BleacherDave on Mar 11, 2008 10:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't consider a team "mid-payroll" based on its highest expenditure level
in years.
By that definition, the Indians, who spent a ton in 2000, are a large-market team. Which is preposterous.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Mar 11, 2008 11:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In '04......
the A's were 15th in payroll. An even higher rank than last year.
My working definition of mid-payroll is middle 1/3 - between 11 & 20. Yours seems to be top 50%; which to me isn't "mid-payroll", but rather "top 50%." The rankings are easily searchable.
And you seem to be, as is frequently done, muddling the definitions of payroll and market in your Cleveland example.
Wittingly or not, your providing great examples of the "common wisdom". Don't believe the hype!
by BleacherDave on Mar 12, 2008 6:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK
I actually looked it up now.
The team ranked: 24, 29, 27, 26, 16, 17, 21, 16, and will now rank next year somewhere in the mid-20s. Ignoring that, and averaging the rest, the team ranked an average of 22nd in payroll. When you consider the various examples of penny-pinching that's been going on around the rest of the organization, I suspect that the overall budget is lower than that.
Well, there goes that theory. No, the A's are not a mid-payroll team.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Mar 12, 2008 10:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I grew up in Stockton
so I don't have much of a connection to Oakland, outside of the A's (and a great band called Machine Head). But when I was 11, my dad got season tickets (with friends) and we made 15 to 20 games a year with the family. Playoffs and World Series games. I never got out of school unless I was on my deathbed, but I did get pulled out of class so we could catch Game 3 in '88.
And now I live in LA, so my connection to the Coli is really far. But if it means the A's are gonna have a little more scratch to pay some guys, how can you complain, you know? I mean, I get it. It's your town, your team, and now they're gonna go play for a new city. But it's still close (and a helluva lot closer than me anyway) and if we actually get to see Beane run a team with a little more money, who knows? Maybe we get to keep some of the guys we see walk away.
Of course, as PT put, if it just goes to line the owner's pockets...
It's Rhodes Scholar Night at the Coliseum tonight.
by Scottbass on Mar 10, 2008 12:01 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
We know where your biases are, BD...
and, we don't blame you any more for them (probably less) than we do for Lew's profit motive. We get it. But, your reasons for being "sickened" and assuming we're "rooting" against our self-interests are wrong:
I won’t buy into the "carpetbagger" phraseology of the OAFC, but these are some of the reasons why the "A’s to Fremont" sickens me. It’s completely rational for Wolff and Baby Gap to want to add to their fortunes. I get that, and can’t knock them for it. What I don’t get, is why so many fans are rooting for the owners pocketbooks instead of their own.As it is now, it’s easy to park, tickets are cheap and available, concession lines are short, and the team is just coming off a great run. For a baseball fan, what’s not to like? High prices and crowds are great for the owners pockets, but not so great for the fans pockets – so why are folks so eager to pay more?
Wolff will move the team out of Oakland regardless of whether it is Fremont. There will be high prices and crowds at the new stadium even if they built it in Oakland, which they won't. So, I just want them to stay in the Bay Area. The fact that it'll be a 15 minute walk for me through a nice neighborhood has very little to do with my support for them moving to Fremont.
Go A's!
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 10, 2008 1:21 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Off topic, but...
what happened on that baserunning play by Willie Mays?
It's Rhodes Scholar Night at the Coliseum tonight.
by Scottbass on Mar 10, 2008 2:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And where would the A's move?
There are 2 reasons that I don't believe the A's would move:
1) Wolff is the minority owner. The Fischer family has deep SF roots and I can't see the team moving out of the Bay Area on their watch.
2) There's no better market to move to.
The threatened move is the extortionary scare tactic that every team uses; I think we're used to it by now. Don't blink.
by BleacherDave on Mar 10, 2008 5:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Straight Outta Oaktown
You never disappoint BD, thanks for the riffs.
These are good arguments for Fremont:
1. The market inefficiencies which allowed Beane’s A’s to compete without payroll are ending, other GMs are getting smarter, and absent a revenue boost the A’s won’t ever see another era of sustained success like 2000-05.
2. The City of Oakland’s efforts to keep the A’s over the last 10 years have been woefully inadequate.
These are bad arguments for Fremont:
1. It’s either that or the A’s move out of state. Sure, they’ll move to a smaller market with equal or worse stadium obstacles (and/or gambling ones re LV). Classic owner guilt trip from the Stadia Extortatus manual, a scare tactic aimed at Barnum-fodder.
2. A new park in Oakland is impossible. Difficult perhaps, but not impossible. Broadway Auto Row, the Oakland Army Base, Oak-to-Ninth, and the existing Coliseum parking lot are all locations where something could happen. Harder to do and less lucrative for Wolffish, but not impossible.
3. I don’t care about the venue, I never go to games. This just makes me sad.
These are the $64,000 questions about Fremont:
1. If it happens, and if it boosts team revenue substantially, will ownership in fact translate that into payroll?
2. Should they? (see: poor player retention/FA signings by moneyed teams)
There is an A in Whimsy.
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Mar 10, 2008 9:20 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think you can hold the sadness
There are so many reasons NOT to go to generic regular season games. It's cold. It takes a long time to get there and back. If you go, you can't do anything else for the evening. It's cold. The view is frequently not much better than on TV, sometimes worse. The food is expensive and mediocre. It costs money I really don't have floating around to spend. Did I mention it was cold?
Unless a game is a. a day game, b. with friends, or c. important (preferably multiples), I'm not likely to turn up. I don't grudge anyone else their own preferences, but it means that for me the impact of a local-area move (where they're still available on TV) is very minimal.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Mar 10, 2008 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wasn't sorry for you
Whether you choose to enjoy baseball at its most personal troubles me not a whit. I am troubled, though, about the longer-term prospects for a sport which grows more and more distanced from the fans in the stands with each passing year.
There is an A in Whimsy.
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Mar 10, 2008 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't feel sorry for you for not going to the games PT.
I just pity you , because there's nothing like being there in person to root on the team you love. I grew up where there was no MLB team...and seeing games live is a treat. It's my great privilege to go watch the team,not my obligation. That's how I view attendance.
I do understand that if you do not go to the games in person that you wouldn't care very much if they moved away ,but even so it would be nice to see you "get" that others feel a sense of loss at losing easy access to the the team we have spent our money and leisure time on for years.
by IM4Oakgal on Mar 11, 2008 12:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, come on
I "get" it. I just don't see much purpose in studding posts about my own opinions and concerns with disclaimers about "others may feel differently." I assumed that since virtually every sentence in my prior posts started with "I think," "for me" or "I'd rather," people would understand it to mean my personal position and feelings on the issue, not a prescription for how everyone else should think.
It appears I was mistaken.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Mar 11, 2008 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No it didn't.
You sure do exaggerate.
by IM4Oakgal on Mar 11, 2008 5:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly Paul
You are the type of "Athletics fan" that gives A's fans a reputation of not supporting their team. I hate to say it, but its people like you who don't attend games, in the midst of the A's being a dominating team for the first half of the decade; that are causing athletics ownership to consider leaving the city of Oakland in the first place. Why would they keep the team in a city that shows no fan support? Why don't you just watch Giants games instead...
"I Will Not Relent, I Am Driven"... Clutch
Bring Back The Bash!!!
by Shippee33 on Mar 12, 2008 7:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gosh, I'm sorry I don't drop $1000 a year
on something I don't particularly want to do. While trying to save money for law school. I mean, who does THAT? What a crap fan.
Also in the category of "crap":
People who buy CDs without buying concert tickets
People who go to restaurants for lunch specials without going there for dinner
People who buy used cars instead of new
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Mar 12, 2008 10:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
Attendance is not really the reason the A's are moving south. It is an easy number to point at and say "see!" So you are partially right. But even if the stadium was full every night, they would be considering this move towards more corporate revenue and higher ARPU, Average Revenue Per Unit, (unit being the ticket).
Professional sports are less about individual fans showing up to 5 games a season and more about luxury boxes, club seats and full/partial season ticket plans.
Although Paul supports one fo the reasons they wish to stay in the Bay Area... media revenue.
All that said... Paul, I'll take you to a flippin' game this year and show you the merit of being there in person if you are down with that.
by jeffro on Mar 13, 2008 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK
I didn't say there was no merit to being there in person.
I just said that it wasn't worth my limited supply of personal entertainment dollars to go to a live game unless it met certain conditions.
If one was, say, a polar bear who enjoys frigid conditions, I would encourage them to attend night games in April as an experience they might appreciate.
And I agree about the media revenue. I don't think people give nearly enough credit to me for the number of times I watched those Fry's Electronics commercials... it was for the good of the team!
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Mar 13, 2008 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've come around to your way of thinking....
on the issue of the A's actually moving out of state....especially so in these uncertain economic times. What I don't "get" is the seemingly total indifference on the part of the Oakland pols. Why are they so indifferent to the team moving? I would have thought that simple civic pride would have forced them to at least squawk on occasion.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on Mar 11, 2008 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree with you, Alox.
Oakland politics are only slightly less absurd than Berkeley's.
by IM4Oakgal on Mar 12, 2008 11:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Coliseum
I don't read Ray Ratto often. The truth is, in my opinion, the Coliseum is an inferior facility to watch baseball games in. Compared to itself pre mid 90's redo and compared to many other facilities I have been too. Raley FIeld in Sacramento, the Phone Booth in SF. It isn't just the view of the hills and quarry.
It is the disappearing center fielder on a fly ball to the warning track from many vantage points, for example.
I am rooting for a cool experience in a new venue. Oakland, Fremont, San Jose, Gilroy, Pleasanton, San Ramon, Concord, Martinez, Santa Rosa, Petaluma etc. It doesn't matter much to me where it is as long as it is in the Bay Area.
by jeffro on Mar 11, 2008 10:18 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice One Bleacher Dave:
I miss my baseball family too...I can't wait to get back out there this year!!!
Cheers,
Saint
by saintoakland on Mar 11, 2008 12:57 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
SAINT!!!
Looking forward to seeing the kidz. The cycle begins anew.....
by BleacherDave on Mar 11, 2008 9:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
BLEACHER DAVE
You're a cult hero of a few buddies of mine. We have a ceremony every time you come on Robert's show...and yes I've heard you a few times on 680. Keep up the solid work, I like what I read.
by SwampyD on Mar 11, 2008 9:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Ceremony?!!
LOL. I'm curious as hell.
All the better if it involves human hair, shots, and yelling. And a goat.
Every ceremony should have a goat.
by BleacherDave on Mar 11, 2008 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, that'll ensure Nico shows up, at least
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Mar 11, 2008 11:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bleacher Dave,
I have you waving the flag in one of my baseball mags from last year. Hope to run into you on opening night.
Go A's !
by sf drift king on Mar 13, 2008 1:57 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















