Pitchers of today vs. Pitchers of yesterday....
There is a sound that has become familiar to us A's faithful around this time of year, it is the sound of a collective gasp everytime Rich Harden takes the mound...heck, even stoops to tie his shoe!
I played ball growing up, and my aunt took a great interest in my development as a player. She was a baseball fan, and she was also the keeper of the Alexander family geneology. She regaled me with stories of older baseball lore, such as Marquez67's great posting. One player in particular that she told me about was my great great uncle, Grover Cleveland Alexander
The stories of Alexander, and the pitchers of that era, all seem to revolve around longevity. Here are some of the highlights of Alexander's accomplishments...
CAREER
Pitched for 20 years in the majors, including two stints with the Phillies, 1911-17 and 1930 . . . Also pitched for the Chicago Cubs (1918-26) and St. Louis Cardinals (1926-29) before retiring after nine appearances with the Phillies in 1930.
WINS
Won 28-19-22-27-31-33-30 in his first seven seasons with the Phillies . . . During those seasons, he averaged 27.1 wins and 355 innings pitched . . . His 28 wins in 1911 remain the modern rookie record . . . 16 of his 33 wins in 1916 were shutouts, still a major league record . . . His 190 Phillies career wins were a record until broken by Robin Roberts . . . Won Phillies' first-ever World Series game, 3-1, over Boston, October 8, 1915.
MISC
His ERA was 1.22, 1.55 and 1.83, 1915-17 . . . Won the NL Triple Crown (W, IP, SO) during same seasons . . .Threw four one-hitters in 1915, another record . . . Won a doubleheader at Ebbets Field in September 1917, 5-0 and 7-3, over Brooklyn . . . During his Phillies career he led the league in innings pitched, six times; wins, shutouts, and strikeouts, five times and ERA, three times . . . Holds club record with 61 career shutouts; Steve Carlton is second with 39 . . . Won a Triple Crown with the Cubs in 1920 . . . Six years later, picked up two wins and a save as the Cardinals won the World Series . . . 373 wins are tied for third all-time . . . 90 shutouts are second to Walter Johnson's 110.
These numbers are astonishing in compare to today's pitchers. And that got me to thinking...."Why are today's pitchers seemingly so fragile?" It is just expected that managers will go to the pen for a reliever after his starter has pitched 6 strong innings. opting for the middle reliever.
So that is my question; has today's athlete gotten less durable or has the game created a less durable athlete?
8 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Survivor effect
Here's a theory:
For every pitcher that was able to pitch a ridiculous number of innings, there must have been a hundred flameouts. Of today's pitchers, many would have been weeded out as they threw 300+ innings from young ages. That - and not performance - would be the primary factor weeding out has-beens from major league pitchers.
That's too bad; I think pitching today is probably much better because we don't try to kill every arm that shows promise. Sure, some of today's pitchers probably could throw 300+ innings if they had been trained to do so from a young age. But a huge number of very talented pitchers would also have their arms shredded and never sniff the majors.
stat-addled alien overlord
One of the great mysteries,
it seems. There has been a lot written about this issue, including last year when Dice-K signed with the Red Sox. His case was slightly different, as he pitched fewer games but had incredibly high pitch counts compared to MLP pitchers, going all the way back to his youth league days. But as much as I've read speculation on it, I have yet to see a convincing argument as to how the former pitchers were able to sustain such a load while the modern era has cut back so drastically. The BP guys have made what looks like a pretty convincing argument that going back to a 4-man rotation would not only be feasible but beneficial to a team without hurting the pitchers, but that is still a long way from the huge numbers of innings pitched by some of the old timers.
If you've ever read The Summer of '49, about the pennant race between the Yanks and Sox, the pitching schedules of the starters blows the mind when compared to today's game. I don't think we'll know how the modern pitcher would react unless someone actually tries to change up rotations.
BTW - very cool to be related to Grover Cleveland Alexander.
billy's a's
No, not Beane. Martin. 94 complete games in 1980. Rick Langford started 33 games and finished 28 of them, including 22 in a row! It wasn't uncommon for any the starters to pitch 12, 13, 14 innings in one game.
Langford was done at age 34 (although he started his decline much earlier), McCatty and Keough were through at 31, Norris at 28 (he did make a comeback attempt at 35).
P.S. Thanks for the mention, but I agree with sslinger; extremely cool stuff to be related to Ol' Pete.
P.S.S. I love the fact that some of the people that gave us our first glimpse of baseball were women (like my grandma and oldest sister).
I'm here to talk about the past.
Probably a lot of things
There's definitely something to be said for the survivor effect mentioned above.
Another aspect is no doubt the game has changed. Mr. Alexander pitched the early years of his career in the deadball era and didn't make it into the ridiculous offensive years of the 1930's. I've read accounts of how pitchers of that era would take it easy against the weaker hitters, only dialing it up for the best players in the lineup and thereby saving their arms. With smaller parks, more athletic players, and a much, MUCH deeper talent pool, every hitter in a modern lineup can do some damage with a mistake (except for Kendall ;)). Pitchers can no longer take batters off like they used to.
Related to the above, the deeper talent pool means that a healthy fraction of today's relievers are decent pitchers in their own right rather than just mop up guys and failed starters. I think it was on Posnanski's site a while back where he referenced Gibson on this very subject. Gibson said something to the effect that when his manager came out to ask him if he was done, he'd look over at the bullpen, see who was warming up, and decide he was still better off than any of them. I think it makes sense from a tactical point of view to switch from a tiring starter to a fresh (and good) reliever.
Just a few thoughts, but I agree it's a very interesting topic (and I'll second the notion that it's pretty cool to trace back to a great pitcher like that)
One of the reasons
for the decline in workload can be attributed to the rise of Babe Ruth and the end of the Dead Ball Era. Before the home run was a true threat, pitchers would toss it up there fairly easy most of the time, saving their top fastballs/etc. for situations with men in scoring position or maybe a very fearsome hitter. Once home runs became more common, pitchers had to throw their best stuff on pretty much every pitch, which puts a whole lot more stress on the arm. One reason why Walter Johnson's fastball was so legendary is that he threw hard every pitch, a rarity for much of his career.
If you look at the record books, for every old-timer like Alexander or Johnson that had amazing longevity and innings pitched totals, there are tons of guys who were great and flamed out due to arm trouble, like Smoky Joe Wood. By limiting innings and games pitched, teams are giving themselves a much better chance of keeping a productive player healthy while lowering the amount of production from those few pitchers who could handle a heavier workload. I guess they've decided less from more is better than a whole lot from very few. Nowadays, managers risk criticism and decreased job stability if a pitcher blows out his arm pitching a bunch of innings.
Breaking PItches
I wasn't around then, but my dad suggested that he has noticed kids are throwing a lot more breaking pitches at younger ages now then he could remember as he was growing up in the 50's and 60's...
It's like building the railroad ...
We remember the fantastic achievements that have stood the test of time, but largely forget the thousands of Irish and Chinese buried along the route.
For every Grover Cleveland Alexander there are probably a dozen Buttons Briggs.
"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback

by 

























