Athletics Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Holy War Week Brings out the Worst in Fans

Thinking Beyond Furcal: A Brief Winter Meeting's Primer

It's been a crazy off-season so far and with Beane and Company heading into the Winter Meetings in Vegas beginning tomorrow with a seemingly totally different set of priorities than they (reportedly) had even days ago, it's sure to get even crazier in the coming days. As has been reported in multiple outlets, Rafael Furcal turned down the A's offer of 4-years for between $35-$40 million.  That action obviously necessitates  a re-thinking of the current shortstop conundrum. The A's are willing to spend  on the free agent market to get some production out of the position, however Furcal would seem like the only candidate who could really do that, at least offensively. I would hope that the A's would avoid the Orlando Cabrera's, Nick Punto's and David Eckstein's of the world. Cabrera - because he'll cost a draft pick, is 34 and has no power. Punto - sub.700 OPS career hitter, no upside. Eckstein - no power whatsoever. Basically, all of the free agent alternatives to Furcal are varying degrees of Bobby Crosby, but are much older and arguably worse defenders. Beane made a competitive offer to the only free agent shortstop worth pursuing, so it's understandable that he's now backtracking a bit, waiting out the market and paying lip-service to the idea of "sticking with Bobby Crosby on '09. Beane could look to trade for a shortstop such as Miguel Tejada or JJ Hardy, but Tejada is a shell of his former self and would cost a decent prospect or two in addition to his $13 million 2009 salary. Hardy would likely cost several premium prospects, if he's made availabe at all.

In the meantime, Beane, ever the bargain-hunter, is shifting focus to veteran starting pitching and corner/DH type sluggers - both of which are not lacking in this year's free agent class - thus, both of which are likely to come at reasonable prices. Randy Johnson reportedly piques the most interest in the former category, while Jason Giambi, Adam Dunn and Pat Burrell are garnering interest in the latter category. Any of these guys, on short-term deals, will help the A's win more games in 2009. The question then becomes: what should be the team's priority going into the 2008 Winter Meetings?

 

Poll
What should the A's priority be at the 2008 Winter Meetings?
1. Re-initiating contract talks with Rafael Furcal.
279 votes
2. Pursuing Giambi, Dunn or Burrell to DH/play some 1st base.
280 votes
3. Adding a veteran to the starting rotation.
336 votes
4. Trading Bobby Crosby at any cost.
396 votes
5. Trading for a shortstop (Tejada, Hardy).
142 votes
6. Acquiring some type of insurance for Chavez at 3rd.
85 votes
7. Trading up the Rule V draft ladder to snag a potential solution at short, 3rd or 1st.
55 votes

1573 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 263 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Olney reports today that Furcal wanted 4/52...

I have two thoughts about that.

First, Furcal is overvaluing himself big time. Secondly, wouldn’t Furcal be worth the extra $12 million?

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Dec 7, 2008 10:31 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

First: Yes. Second: No.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 11:55 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Got a link to that story?

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 7, 2008 3:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I read that somewhere too, but now I can only find it here:

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/12/heymans-lates-1.html

Heyman thinks its peculiar that Rafael Furcal passed up his last offer of 4 years, $35-40MM, especially while the shortstop market is thinning out. The Giants signed Edgar Renteria. The Cubs want a lefty-bat. The Braves need to deal Yunel Escobar before they’ll be interested in Furcal. Again, Buster Olney noted today that Furcal was asking 4 years, $52MM.

Save Rajai Davis

by oakinboston on Dec 7, 2008 3:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I just checked out Olney, his page doesn't say that now

Furcal was asking for that much a month ago, I want to know if that figure is from recent chatter.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 7, 2008 3:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, I'm surprised

I almost jokingly voted for “Trade Bobby Crosby at any cost” but that option is winning big-time! I’m a pretty big Crosby hater, but still I’d have to think that losing Crosby would weaken the A’s position in any signing or trade negotiation, creating a position of need for the team vs. a position of possible gain. I’m guessing that in Beane’s ideal scenario, the Furcal deal would’ve gotten done prior to the winter meetings so that he could focus on trading Crosby, but no such luck.

"God doesn't pay attention to your cute little hypotheticals." -- Jeff from LL

by oblique on Dec 7, 2008 10:40 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

LOL

I guess wanting and getting are two different things then.

by Trainman on Dec 7, 2008 10:41 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I'm concerned about the starting rotation

where the ace is the only veteran and hasn’t been able to stay healthy enough to pich a full season, and the rest of the rotation consists of largely unproven or not quite ready rookies.

That’s of course in addition to the need for at least one more big bat.

by OaklandSi on Dec 7, 2008 10:42 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I am also concerned.

I am wondering if that concern would make the A’s likely to even look beyond RJ to other free agent starters, if he decides to sign elsewhere. Jon Garland, for example, would be an interesting guy to look at, in my opinion. His peripheral stats are terrible and his stuff isn’t great, but he’s durable, playoff-experienced and with that sinker can eat some innings. As a 4 or 5 starter for a year or two, the A’s could do a lot worse.

I'm never gonna do it without the fez on!

by Taj Adib on Dec 7, 2008 10:50 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Jon Garland is unbelievably horrible

The fact that he shared in the Angels’ bountiful teamwide bestowal of insane, unrepeatable luck last season is not very relevant.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 11:15 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

-hyperbole

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Dec 7, 2008 11:16 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

"You know, a long time ago being crazy meant something. Nowadays everybody's crazy."

-Charles Manson

by kaweahkaweah on Dec 7, 2008 12:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

meme copycat, FTW!

"I'm going to take a camera crew and march into Billy Beane's office and demand to know why instituting his newfangled cost-saving measures means that the run manufacturing plant had to get shut down." FJM

by Elvez on Dec 7, 2008 2:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

double digit wins and mid-4 ERA in the AL

that sounds like a 4 starter, especially in a pitcher’s park. No one claims that he’s great, nor even that he’d be a first choice. But he’s far from “unbelievably horrible”

by OaklandSi on Dec 7, 2008 11:19 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd rather go with those five independent of salary

Take into account that you actually have to pay Garland real money and it’s not even close.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 11:37 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

doesn't garland require a pick as well as stupid money?

Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom

by designatedforassignment on Dec 7, 2008 12:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Then why in gods name was he offered arbitration?

Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom

by designatedforassignment on Dec 7, 2008 5:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Because Reagins is convinced enough that Garland can get a multi year deal elsewhere

and thus believes that Garland will decline.

Although, I could see it going both ways.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 5:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

but you would only take that risk if Garland is an A or B FA

… which i finally got off my lazy ass and checked.

Garland is a type B

Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom

by designatedforassignment on Dec 7, 2008 9:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Aw, pants

Garland declines arb.

Reading between the lines, it doesn’t sound like he’s re-signing with Anaheim, either.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 8, 2008 12:16 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Considering that Eveland and Braden outperformed Garland

this year…

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 1:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Key words: "sounds like"

He had a tRA of 5.74 last season. The guy hasn’t missed a bat in years.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 11:36 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+ a lot

Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom

by designatedforassignment on Dec 7, 2008 12:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+ infinity

He’s horrible. I will cry if the A’s sign him.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 1:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I still want a shot at Cabrera

He’s slightly below average with the bat, but because of a positional adjustment he’s still an above average shortstop on offense. As well, he defense is still solid and he’s certainly going to be an upgrade over Crosby. Sure, he is 34 and not getting any younger, but I still think we could squeeze 2 good years out of him. I would like to see the A’s give him a two year contract assuming he is going to come cheap. As well, it’s also a possibility he declines arbitration since he realizes that he is out of the White Sox plans. Of course, I still think it’s more likely he accepts Arb, but according the MLB Trade Rumors it’s a possibility he doesnt.

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Dec 7, 2008 10:45 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

cons w/ cabrera

draft pick

giants pushed up the ss market due to renteria’s 9mill/yr

by Asfan4ever723 on Dec 7, 2008 10:57 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

From Fangraphs

Crosby is a .288 wOBA with a 0 UZR/150
Cabrera is a .281 wOBA with a 13.4 UZR/150

He’s better defensively, but a worse hitter (especially if he spends 2009 in Oakland). He’s better over-all, but maybe not enough to make a huge salary worthwhile.

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Dec 7, 2008 11:19 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This is wrong

I was looking at Cabrera’s OBP, now wOBA (which is .316).

I’m not as sold on his defense (his previous two seasons had significantly lower UZR/150), but I was wrong to say he is a worse hitter.

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Dec 7, 2008 11:31 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

crosby was so pathetic last yr

cabrera ops was 60pts higher and still only .705

by Asfan4ever723 on Dec 7, 2008 11:34 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

depending on your view of Cabrera

I think he is going to be ranging from 1-2 wins better than Crosby in the coming season. Add in the fact that he’s been a vastly lesser injury risk than Crosby, and I think it’s inarguable that Cabrera wouldn’t benefit us in some capacity. However, as with all things baseball, it comes down to cost. If we can sign Cabrera to a Renteria-like-deal and somehow get rid of Crosby’s salary for a nonprospect, we should be breaking even and improving our team concurrently, assuming Cabrera declines arbitration. However, since that may or may not be likely, the actual salary we would offer him should depend on whether or not he costs that draft pick. I don’t know how much a 2nd round draft pick costs in terms of money, but I think if we could get Cabrera on a deal for 2/18 or less without draft pick compensation or 2/16 with compensation, he’d be worth it. Of course, this is only one person’s opinion, and subject to debate.

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Dec 7, 2008 11:49 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not only is Cabrera just not very good

He’s not worth losing a draft pick. He was offered arbitration.

I’d rather have Crosby.

by thejd44 on Dec 7, 2008 3:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

'not very good'

still doesn’t exactly rule out his ability to produce more than Crosby. He is marginally better at defense, definitely better at offense, and probably better on the basepaths. He only costs a 2nd rounder, since our 1st round is protected, and if he comes cheaper than renteria’s deal, I’d at least consider it. I’d rather have O Cab than BoCro.

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Dec 7, 2008 4:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

A second round draft pick is NOT a reason not to sign a guy

Especially when your first round pick is protected AND you’ve amassed a large amount of young talent via trades.

The A’s farm system will be fine without that draft pick. I’d rather sign the Type A now than sign a Type A next offseason and give up a pick.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 1:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

"pick" meaning first round pick next year.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 1:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's absolutely a reason, and a good one

When the guy you’re signing had a fluke good season with the glove and is likely to be marginally better (if that) than Crosby offensively. I don’t think he’s worth even a full win upgrade.

by thejd44 on Dec 7, 2008 3:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not saying that the A's should go out and sign Cabrera

I’m saying that the draft pick shouldn’t be the reason they don’t sign Cabrera.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 3:28 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

If the perceived gains from signing Cabrera are marginal enough,

it might tip the scales. Right now it looks like the A’s would end up paying about $13 million net to gain about 4 wins above replacement (assuming they either dump Crosby’s salary for nothing or eat it and deal him for a 1-WAR prospect). If you think losing the draft pick eats up 2 of those wins, suddenly the deal doesn’t look very attractive.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 4:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If the perceived gains from signing Cabrera are that marginal

then the A’s should really NOT sign him and instead spend the cash on more pronounced gains.

Regardless of a draft pick. Although you’re right in the fact that the draft pick can tip the scales, depending on the value you assign a draft pick.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 5:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

In his career?

I don’t know. Really. Never seen a comprehensive, properly analytical study.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 7:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I just get the sense that AN overvalues draft picks a little too much...

And it’s not 2 wins vs. the whole career of a second rounder, it’s way more complex than that. For starters, you have 2 wins per year for the whole contract. Secondly, losing your 2nd round pick gives you a lot more money to sign your 3rd round pick which means you can think about going overslot in the 3rd round. The cumulative effect of that will get a lot of value back for losing just a 2nd round pick. And 2nd round picks are crapshoots anyways, heck even first round picks are crapshoots in baseball.

Study or not, my gut tells me it’s probably not very close.

Jeremy was safe. He jumped over the tag.

by mrrickyg on Dec 8, 2008 12:41 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The money argument is a fallacy

Either a player is worth going overslot for, or he isn’t. If he is, you should draft him and pay him. Regardless of what you did in the prior round. No team is going to go broke from having to spend an extra couple hundred thousand bucks on a draft pick.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 8, 2008 12:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

In the context of the amateur draft, every team in baseball has an unlimited budget

The most any team could ever possibly spend on drafting is less than the amount even the Marlins spend on player payroll in a given season.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 8, 2008 11:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Theoretically yes.

In practice I can’t believe you are even making this argument. The term “overslot” wouldn’t even exist if you were anywhere close to being correct on this.

Jeremy was safe. He jumped over the tag.

by mrrickyg on Dec 9, 2008 10:29 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think if you sign Cabrera

you’re not going to be getting a steal, but you won’t be overpaying either. I really think you’re going to be getting what you pay for, and at least he can hold the fort down for, say, 2 more years, thus giving the A’s more time to figure out their SS situation. He may not be quite as valuable as Furcal, but he’s certainly more valuable than Crosby. You can haggle over what SS you want to play for the A’s next season, but I really hope it’s not Crosby again if this is the year we’re supposed to be contending again.

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Dec 8, 2008 8:07 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Cabrera is interesting...

I wouldn’t mind a guy who can hit for a little average. Undoubtedly OPS and all that stuff is better and a walk is as good as a single, etc… but it seems like it would sure be nice to have another .280 < hitter somewhere in the lineup.

Though I voted for revisiting Furcal. I think Furcal is the best upgrade we can make this offseason.

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Dec 7, 2008 10:57 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

That could happen

Furcal I’m sure wanted to see if he could do better at the meetings. Beane didn’t want to be the one showing up at the party with the hot girl that no one believes he’s “just friends” with, hence the ultimatum/public rejection. At the end of the week, if they’re both still single…who knows?

"God doesn't pay attention to your cute little hypotheticals." -- Jeff from LL

by oblique on Dec 7, 2008 11:17 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Let me repeat myself...

“… but it seems like it would sure be nice to have another .280 < hitter somewhere in the lineup.”

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Dec 7, 2008 11:37 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

3 .280<hitters is not enough!

They're called RUNS for a reason.

by connie mack on Dec 7, 2008 9:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This is killing me

Why are you saying “.280 less than hitters”?

That’s both ungrammatical and illogical… it should be “greater than .280 hitters” or “>.280 hitters.” No?

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 10:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I was pretty amused

perhaps you could read it as hitters above .280?
It takes a helpful reader…

by ohmangoAs on Dec 8, 2008 12:39 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah i had to read it about 3 times to figure out what they meant

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Dec 8, 2008 8:08 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

you are correct, sir

I just used the layout already used, but my point stands

They're called RUNS for a reason.

by connie mack on Dec 8, 2008 7:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

runners don't score from 2b on a walk

I think that is where we get it wrong on this site.
Lots of A’s innings go hit, walk, walk, end of inning
or walk, hit, walk, end of inning
the only way two walks and a hit add up to a run is when the hit comes after the two walks.
BUT WE DON’T HAVE ENOUGH HITTERS!
So a couple lifetime .280 BA guys could have a very large effect on the A’s offense, even if they don’t bring a lot of power, if they are replacing standard A’s players (.230 BA, .330 OBP, .350 SLG)

They're called RUNS for a reason.

by connie mack on Dec 7, 2008 9:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This is bunk

but it requires actual work to figure that out. Fortunately, people less lazy than you or I have actually done that work.

Regardless— bunk.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 10:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Here's an idea...

The Cubs are looking for a left-handed hitter. They’re looking at Adam Dunn and we know that they’re a little strapped for cash.

How does this sound?

Build a trade around Ryan Theriot and Jack Cust. This gives the Cubs what they want, a power-hitting left-handed bat. It gives the A’s an upgrade at SS. It also allows us to sign Dunn, possibly for less than it should take because the Cubs would be out of the running.

Also, Dunn could play 1B or DH, depending on how Barton’s spring goes.

Thoughts?

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Dec 7, 2008 11:17 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

The more I look into it... we'd need Theriot +...

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Dec 7, 2008 11:20 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not happening

Theriot was so good for them last year I can’t see them moving him.

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Dec 7, 2008 11:21 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Theriot's OPS was under .750

I think he’d be a decent upgrade over Crosby but I think Cust is more valuable.

What do the “stats” guy have to say about this?

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Dec 7, 2008 11:23 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If I may interject...

Theriot is probably not going to hit .300+ in Oakland, and he has no power. By no power, I mean he has less power than even David Eckstein. Offensively, I don’t know if he’d be much of an upgrade over Crosby, and he’s certainly not worth giving up the A’s best hitter not named Holliday for. Essentially, I’m saying that Cust is too valuable, damnit.

by Jack Cust is valuable damnit on Dec 7, 2008 12:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

maybe being optimistic

but i think pennington can be a theriot type player w/ better defense

their skillset is similar

difference it took theriot till age 27/28 to stick in the majors

by Asfan4ever723 on Dec 7, 2008 11:31 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

First of all Cust is more valuable to this team than Theriot would be

And second of all, the A’s have little to no chance of signing Dunn, unless we severely overpay, which I am not a fan of. He’s too many teams fallback option and one of them will freak when their Tex or Sabs or Manny doesn’t work out.

by stranahanahan on Dec 7, 2008 11:24 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We could even send Crosby back to them.

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Dec 7, 2008 11:25 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This is the first time that the words "Ryan Theriot" and "upgrade" have ever been used in the same sentence

Seriously: not good. A random BABIP spike does not a good player make.

Also, he’s embarrassing as a defensive shortstop. His arm is frankly inadequate for the position.

I’d do it if there was another good player in the deal, but they really don’t have any. Every prospect in their system who got a B- grade or higher is in short-season ball, except for Jeff Samardzija, and the last thing the A’s need is another erratic bullpen pitcher.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 11:32 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wait, seriously?

No shit. Wow, that was not a good idea.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 5:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I can't believe

how much leverage Notre Dame gave Samardzija.

And that leverage was doubled when it was the Cubs who picked him…

by ohmangoAs on Dec 7, 2008 6:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Theriot's BABIP was 339

His line drive rate 23.2%. It is possible that that was a random BABIP spike. OTOH, he also hit a lot of groundballs, and almost never popped up.

He has the skillset to have a high BABIP: lots of line drives, pops up less often than league average, fairly fast.

ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524

by rfloh on Dec 7, 2008 4:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Go to THT and check out the Dutton/Bendix article

It has their model’s predicted BABIP for hitters in an Excel spreadsheet which you can download.

In Theriot’s case, his last two seasons have had predicted BABIP of .291 and .311, suggesting that his true talent BABIP is around .300.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 4:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Cust is worth a lot more than Theriot

In this market, Cust will be way undervalued. He’s undervalued as is, but as Dunn’s understudy, he’ll be even more undervalued.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 1:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Suggestion:

Can we call him Dunn-lite or Diet-Dunn instead of Dunn’s understudy?

by Jack Cust is valuable damnit on Dec 7, 2008 1:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The Dunn/Cust difference isn't really that high

Marcel has Cust projected at a .369 WOBA next year, and Dunn at .372

Dunn has played his entire career in a launchpad, while Cust’s main MLB experience has been with Oakland, where hitters go to die.

But, the market will look at him as Dunn’s understudy/Dunn-lite/Diet-Dunn/etc.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 1:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i'd rather trade Travis Buck to the Cubs

for their 3b prospect and Chad Gaudin.
Put Gaudin back in the starting rotation, sign Juan Rivera for Right Field, and add Vitters to the mix at 3b

They're called RUNS for a reason.

by connie mack on Dec 7, 2008 10:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I would rather trade Travis Buck for David Wright

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 10:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

awww i was going to use him to trade for A-Rod :-(

Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom

by designatedforassignment on Dec 7, 2008 10:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Fine

Crosby for A-Rod, A-Rod slides back to SS

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Dec 7, 2008 10:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You think he's got SS range still?

Probably better to package Crosby with Buck to get Jose Reyes along with Wright.

by mikev on Dec 7, 2008 11:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

How about OMGJeter?

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Dec 8, 2008 7:12 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

thats an overpay!

Saarloos for Lincecum

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Dec 8, 2008 8:12 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

also there has been talk that gaudin would be nontendered.

Though i would doubt that he would be interested in coming back to the A’s after we didn’t keep him in the rotation this year

Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom

by designatedforassignment on Dec 7, 2008 10:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I would love to get Gaudin back.

Especially this year. We could use him as a starter.

They're called RUNS for a reason.

by connie mack on Dec 8, 2008 8:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Theriot seems to be quite unpopular among Cubs fans

Supposedly Piniella likes him, but that could be the imagination of his detractors. Watching him, he seems good, not great, but dare I say, “gritty.”

Without looking at his stats, my recollection is pretty good plate discipline and a good contact hitter who can go to all fields.

by Lovejoy on Dec 8, 2008 9:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No to Cabrera

That guy is a head case. He always seems to be saying some negative thing or sulking around. I’d rather take a shot at Tejada.

RIVER CATS: AAA CHAMPS!

by niallmack on Dec 7, 2008 11:18 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Also

Missing out on Furcal could be really lucky if he gets injured, but he has the potential to be the biggest difference maker on the free agent market for this year and next year since we have no replacement at SS.

RIVER CATS: AAA CHAMPS!

by niallmack on Dec 7, 2008 11:19 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

still a risk

13mill/yr, not willing to take a paycut even after 2 yrs of off and on injuries.

he’s delusional or very confident he can find a team willing to overpay

honestly, he shouldve just took the 2yr/25mill from dodgers

by Asfan4ever723 on Dec 7, 2008 11:37 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I've always wondered if players can provide insight to their new teams about their old teams strategies

if that makes any sense. For example, say Kurt Suzuki decides to take an indefinite leave of absence in order to go explore the Mariana Trench. Coincidentally and amazingly, Mike Napoli is released by the Angels for insubordination by hitting better than Jeff Mathis, and the A’s pick him up. Can he now provide another insight into the Angels Pitcher’s tendencies etc. and other Mike Scioscia strategies? If so, would Cabrera help us even more than just his on-field contributions?

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Dec 7, 2008 11:54 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I think Beane will rule 5 a shortstop

and let Crosby and said person battle it out in Spring Training for the starting spot. A few options:

Daniel Mayora
Corey Wimberly
Will Rhymes
Andres Blanco
Oswaldo Navarro
Kenny Perez

Maybe I should just make a fanpost comparing these guys. There are a lot of options though, so I’m not sure we have to trade up for it. I think top priority is a slugger.

rebuildingseason.blogspot.com

by Rebuilding Season on Dec 7, 2008 12:00 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

i woudln't say there are a "lot of options"

Daniel Mayora is the only one who actually looks really good out of the bunch, and he hasn’t played above A ball. The rest of the guys either aren’t ready for the Bigs, or weren’t that great in AAA and probably don’t project to be any better than BoCro next season.

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Dec 7, 2008 12:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Looking through, the only one who looks

like a possibility to me is Kenny Perez, whose stats are probably good mostly due to his being 26. The others either aren’t ready to be on the major league roster or have such low SLG they worry me.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 12:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

if Beane gets the first guy, he's the opening-day SS in Fremont ...

… a parking lot with a Mayora.

I'll send you a postcard from Space Mountain. @('.')@

by monkeyball on Dec 8, 2008 10:01 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

My thoughts on post-Furcal options that don't suck too bad:
  • Run with Cabrera for two years at roughly Crosby money, thereby upgrading BA and defense to get a better .700 OPS player at SS. Cabrera would be a very solid #9 hitter in a decent lineup and he’s a solid SS. I believe the A’s can trade Crosby without eating any of his salary if they don’t ask much in return.
  • See if you can build a trade that doesn’t part with Cahill/Anderson to get Asdrubal Cabrera (likely) or J.J. Hardy (less likely). Might be painful but worth it.
  • Trade for an unproven SS. Here’s a random thought: A three-way deal with Tampa Bay and Colorado in which Street moves to the Rays, Brignac goes to the A’s, and perhaps Mazzaro goes to the Rockies.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 12:02 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I've thought about a 3-way trade for awhile.

Mine goes something like:
- Jake Peavy to Milwaukee
- James Simmons, Jeremy Jeffress, Lorenzo Cain & Gregorio Petit to San Diego
- J.J. Hardy to Oakland

Milwaukee stands to lose both Sabathia and Sheets to free agency, creating a gaping hole at the front of their rotation. They’ve shown willingness to pay big dollars for Sabathia, so Peavy’s salary shouldn’t be an impediment. San Diego sheds the salary while getting a very high upside arm (Jeffress), a lower-upside, SoCal native safe bet that could be a nice mid-rotation starter in a year or two (Simmons) a future everyday center-fielder and a defensively-solid middle-infielder that could turn in a few nice offensive seasons spraying line-drives around Petco (Petit).

A’s get Hardy for two years entering his prime, after which they could re-sign him and/or move him to 3rd after Chavez’s contract is up.

I'm never gonna do it without the fez on!

by Taj Adib on Dec 7, 2008 12:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd love that deal, but I can't see

getting Hardy for just Simmons and Petit, whether in a two or three team deal. Oakland just isn’t giving up enough, IMO.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 12:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

What if the A's added Henry Rodriguez?

I'm never gonna do it without the fez on!

by Taj Adib on Dec 7, 2008 12:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

On top of which

I don’t see Peavy agreeing to go to Milwaukee.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 12:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, with all the Peavy to Cubs rumors

I’d assume Milwaukee isn’t close on the list.

The Brewers are contenders as long as they have the pitching. Peavy is “the pitching” they need.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 2:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I would love to see Petit get a fair shot at SS

against Crosby. Seriously, if they were both making the minimum which one would make the roster?

They're called RUNS for a reason.

by connie mack on Dec 7, 2008 10:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm with you

I love Petit, too. But evidence strongly suggests the A’s front office does not.

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Dec 7, 2008 10:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

cabrera at renteria money

probably a bit higher

though his market maybe limited since teams may not want to give up their 1st rd pick

the only teams 15th pick and later that may need a SS…dodgers, jays, twins

below: orioles, reds, tigers, maybe kc

by Asfan4ever723 on Dec 7, 2008 12:20 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I want Cabrera now, but not Orlando.

I think Beane should go hard after Asdrubal. He won’t cost as much as either one of the Escobars or JJ Hardy IMO.

It’s almost too bad that we dealt Street in the Holliday trade, because involving him in a deal with Cleveland would have been awesome.

Still, I think Furcal eventually lands in Oakland.

by mikev on Dec 7, 2008 12:26 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I agree - Street would have been the guy to deal to get Asdrubal

Perhaps Mazzaro could be a piece, perhaps Buck. Not sure what else falls in the win-win category of talent, i.e. pieces the Indians would want but that the A’s could afford to part with.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 12:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think you need four starting OFers nowadays to be "set"

Plus, the ability to turn around and deal Guiterrez or something, to fill a different hole, has real value.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 12:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think here at AN we talk too much about...

This trade happening to set such and such trade up so that another trade can be set up for this trade to happen.

These things don’t happen in the real world. At least not nearly as much as we think here at AN.

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Dec 7, 2008 12:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I just don't see the Indians dealing a very good, young 2B for..

A pitcher with kind of a flukey 2008 and a 4th outfielder with injury problems.

by Jack Cust is valuable damnit on Dec 7, 2008 1:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Their needs are at first and second base

but moving Cabrera would open up a hole for them at shortstop too. And the Indians are not punting next season— they’re hoping to contend.

I really don’t think they have any desire whatsoever to trade Cabrera, nor should they.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 12:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know that they have a need at 1B

They have Garko, and many of their up and coming prospects could move to 1B (Hodges, Mills, LaPorta). Plus V. Martinez’ positionality seems to change annually.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 12:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

They could just leave Peralta there. Cabrera has been mainly playing 2B for them anyway.

Unless they’re planning on moving Peralta to third so Cabrera can take over at short, leaving a hole at second.

I’d offer up something around, say, Casilla, Mazzaro, and Petit or Pennington.

by mikev on Dec 7, 2008 12:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think the CW is that Peralta needs to move to 3B

But I don’t know if the Indians are resigned to that or not.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 12:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And if I was Mark Shapiro, I'd reject that out of hand and demand Brett Anderson or Trevor Cahill

Cabrera is an excellent defensive MI who is 22 and, despite his issues this year, has a career OPS+ of BLANK. I’m not dealing him for a head-case reliever, a utility player and a guy with a Joe Blanton ceiling.

Cabrera has huge upside, it’s just masked by the fact that he’s a shortstop. He’s got the potential to hit something like .300/.380/.470 with +5 run defense at shortstop, which is crazy valuable. I’d at least seriously consider taking imaginary-Shapiro up on his offer of Cahill for Cabrera.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 1:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Heh

Forgot to fill in that OPS+ line… my internet is being balky today. Well, lets say he has a career EqA of .264.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 1:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree....

I think we’re having a little “Omar” moment here on AN. We seem to be overvaluing our own prospects and devaluing what other teams have.

Assuming you’re right and Cabrera is an excellent defender then i’d agree with you that the A’s should seriously consider your made up offer of Cahill for Cabrera.

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Dec 7, 2008 1:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I actually didn't remember he was only 22

I must have gotten a splotch of Asdrubal in my eye.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 1:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

careful dude

I heard that’s how you get pink eye

Save Rajai Davis

by oakinboston on Dec 7, 2008 2:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Are you calling Asdrubal shitty?

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 2:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.

If the A’s can get Cabrera without giving up Cahill/Anderson, it was probably a massive steal for the A’s.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 1:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I am definitely in the minority here, not just because I am black, but

if the A’s upgrade the rest of the lineup, as it seems they might, I don’t have a problem with Bobby Crosby as the opening day SS, batting 8th in front of Ellis. If the A’s get a 30-40 HR 1st baseman, you have over 100 Hr;s in the 3-4-5 holes, with Cust-Holiday, and said addition. That is a competitive team/

by theblackpearl on Dec 7, 2008 1:31 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

If the rotation doesn't suck, but that's for another day

The only problem I see with the logic is that to get the 30-40 HR 1Bman, you have to take a big hit on defense. Or sign Teixeira, which would be super-groovy though not realistic.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 1:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If we're going for super-groovy

I’d rather sign C.C. Sabathia. Even more super-groovy but less unrealistic (on the order of 0.2% chance of happening vs 0.1%.)

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Dec 7, 2008 10:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think Tampa's success last season...

was an indicator of how a team can build a competent offense while relying on a light-hitting, defense-first shortstop (Jason Bartlett). Yet even Bartlett out-performed Crosby last season, and by a fairly wide margin. He’s also a better baserunner and a better defender.

As you indicated, if the A’s were to improve the lineup in some other areas (like adding a Dunn/Burrell/Giambi hitter at 1st) along with a veteran starter for the rotation, then I have no problem with doing like the Rays do and settling for an Big Glove/Little Bat stop-gap st short – I imagine that the team would be fairly decent in that case.

Unfortunately, Crosby is no longer a real plus defender and there are guys on the waiver wire that can hit better than he can. So, while I find some value in your theory, Crosby is not the type of player with which to executive such a plan…

I'm never gonna do it without the fez on!

by Taj Adib on Dec 7, 2008 1:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Bartlett is underrated

Because of his lack of power. Overall, he was average offensively for SS in 2008. He’s been an average offensive SS from 2006-2008.

ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524

by rfloh on Dec 7, 2008 4:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This theory doesn't work unless the #8 hitter is pitcher-bad

Ordinarily, you’re better off just hitting your hitters in the order in which you want them to get at-bats.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 2:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Darren Oliver accepted arbitration.

Now we just need Jon Garland to do the same.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 1:56 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

That's fantastic news

Costs the Angels 2 draft picks, and all they get is one year of a solid middle reliever.

Agreed on Garland, although him accepting would only knock out one more of their picks.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 2:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He also ties up 12++ MM that the team can't spend somewhere else.

where it would actually be needed. And a rotation spot, unless they want to move Garland to the pen.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 2:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd like to make a prediction

Prediction: Beane will arrive late to the winter meetings and leave early

by MoneyManWilliam on Dec 7, 2008 1:56 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

On Friday afternoon

I saw Bob Geren at the Oakland Airport. Maybe he was heading to Vegas early!

by kenarneson on Dec 7, 2008 2:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Was Swisher traded before or after the meetings?

If i remember correctly it was before.

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Dec 7, 2008 2:57 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

To Oakland, it was January, so it was after.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 3:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I am really surprised

by the poll results so far. Why should trading crosby at any cost be our top priority? That’s basically saying “let’s get rid of our shortstop for basically nothing so that we can loose whatever leverage we have in obtaining a replacement for him” Seriously, why not wait to deal crosby until after we’ve found someone better to replace him? In addition, whoever we get for him will probably do nothing to fill the aforementioned holes the team has, so why rush into a trade? If beane dedicates his efforts at the winter meetings to finding a trade partner for crosby, i think he could be using that time to do something a little more useful. maybe those who voted can explain their reasoning, cuz im a little confused

by chipper1001 on Dec 7, 2008 3:25 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Oh I agree.

Filling other holes on the club is more important than dumping Crosby.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 4:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Here's the explanation:

WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE!

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Dec 7, 2008 10:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Indians may be interested in Furcal

Indians may be interested in Furcal

Views
    197
Comments
    2

    * Posted by:
      Jon Heyman
    * 06:00 PM ET 12.07
    * Share

LAS VEGAS — The Indians could be a new team in the mix for star free-agent shortstop Rafael Furcal, who recently rejected Oakland’s $36 million, four-year offer and will resume shopping for a new team.

Furcal’s agent Paul Kinzer added that there are two other mystery teams in the mix, as well. The Braves had been thought to be a possibility if they traded incumbent shortstop Yunel Escobar first. The Dodgers would consider getting back into the mix, but they wanted to give Furcal two years, not four. The Cubs appear focused on a left-handed hitter right now.

Kinzer didn’t say what happened in Oakland, only that a couple problems arose. He said Furcal was serious about going to the A’s, pointing out that the player flew up for a tour.

by Asfan4ever723 on Dec 7, 2008 4:12 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

What bothers me about that report...

was that Heyman seems to insinuate that there was something else besides the years and the money that arose which complicated the negotiations between Furcal and the A’s. Was it some kind of injury issue? Was it a character thing? Pure speculation on my part, but it seems like Heyman believes there was something else beyond the figures that led Beane and Furcal to part ways for the time being…

I'm never gonna do it without the fez on!

by Taj Adib on Dec 7, 2008 4:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh god I hope not.

and I haven’t been in the area for a long time.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 4:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If there really is some intangible involved

then ouch…

Or it could be something like a no-trade clause… which I hope the A’s don’t give him.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 4:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, a NTC could have been a problem

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 7, 2008 4:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The NTC just sounds like the most logical "intangible" to me IMO

I don’t think Beane would’ve taken him to the ugly parts, and, unless there’s something else REALLY detestable about this area…

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 4:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

full or partial no-trade clause

could be the issue. I bet Furcal (and many FA’s who are thinking about the A’s) would want one, but Beane would definitely not want to give one.

by ohmangoAs on Dec 7, 2008 6:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

What's odd is that for Furcal to fly to Oakland from the DR

he must have intended to sign – or to SERIOUSLY consider signing – with the A’s, and after all the meetings they must have had a pretty good idea of the type of offer Beane would make. Yet…Weird.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 6:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Link?

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 7, 2008 4:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Here.

Ta-dah

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 4:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yay technology!

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 7, 2008 7:19 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yea, a problem did arise.

Furcal wanted a ridiculous amount of years and money.

Sometimes life will strike you out on a curve ball and the only choice you have is to flip off the umpire and walk to first base anyway.

by Threepwood XX on Dec 7, 2008 4:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If he wanted 4/52, you are right.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 4:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

what they should do now...

I think they should move on from furcal, try to sign Dunn to a short term, high salary deal (2 year,35 mill with team option for 3rd year?) then put him at first and package crosby, barton, and maybe bailey/h.rodriguez to get a good SS. Obviously this is easier said than done…

all i know is crosby is in a “gots ta go” situation. Also need a #2 or 3 starter (at least for next year)

that's gold jerry, gold!!!

by 9Custs on Dec 7, 2008 4:43 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Just something I find interesting

OPS+ and games played last 3 years, 2006-2008:

Giambi: 148 (139), 108 (83), 128 (145)
Dunn: 114 (16), 136 (152), 129 (158)
Burrell: 122 (144), 127 (155), 125 (157)
Raul Ibanez: 125 (159), 121 (149), 124 (162)

For a stopgap 1b / DH, Ibanez should definitely be considered

ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524

by rfloh on Dec 7, 2008 4:47 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Personally, I prefer Abreu to Ibanez

Particularly since he won’t cost a pick.

It really is remarkable how many identical good-hit-no-field slugger outfielder types are out on the market this offseason.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 5:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Abreu's also a better hitter.

Since DH is hit-only, and neither should see the field.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 5:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Where does that leave Cust?

Is the sign Ibanez/Abreu idea to put Cust in LF, Sweeney in CF, Holliday in RF and sit/demote Buck and Cunningham?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 6:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not supporting the signing.

I was saying Abreu was a better hitter than Ibanez.

I’m VERY strongly against the signing of any 1B/DH type. Dunn, Burrell, Giambi, Abreu, Ibanez, I don’t want any of them on the A’s personally.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 6:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The only way I'd want them is if we're stuck with Crosby

you might want to stick Dunn or someone at 1B, eat the defense, and try to build a lineup that can score enough to contend if our pitching progresses as hoped. Hey, it works for Texas. Wait…

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 6:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

dye to reds

Reds Trade Bailey For Dye?
By Tim Dierkes [December 7 at 7:46pm CST]

According to Hal McCoy of the Dayton Daily News, a Major League source told him a Homer Bailey for Jermaine Dye trade “is done and will be announced this week.”

It’d essentially be six years of Bailey for one of Dye (plus possible draft pick compensation), as Dye has a mutual option for 2010 at $12MM. Those almost never get fully exercised – if one side wants it, the other doesn’t. It would be interesting to see what the White Sox could do with Bailey given their recent success developing young pitchers.

by Asfan4ever723 on Dec 7, 2008 6:08 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

The A's couldn't match that?

:-( Me want Jermainey back.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 6:10 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

outfield is stacked, need infield/ pithing help

that's gold jerry, gold!!!

by 9Custs on Dec 7, 2008 6:19 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I'm plenty pithy, thank you.

Jermaine can play SS. I’ve seen him.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 6:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He can barely play the outfield

Bad trade for the Reds. I know Bailey’s a possible bust but Dye just doesn’t help that much.

Meanwhile, Williams continues dismantling his team. Who’s next out of town, Pierzynski?

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 7:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I hope not

He fits in perfectly with that team.

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on Dec 7, 2008 7:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I happen to think Bailey is a bust,

but that just means “bad trade for both teams” – Dye is in the last year of his contract and isn’t going to help the Reds meaningfully, while the White Sox have now lost Dye and replaced Vasquez with Bailey…

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 7:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Recced for sheer awesomeness

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 7:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Beane's monday blues

  Beane walks into the hotel lobby and is greated by some hand shakes from other GM’s because of the Furcal gate. Kinzer sees Beane and rushes over and says lets have a meeting and see if we can still work something out. Boras smiles and walks on by. JP comes by and ask about a loan. Many other GMs come by and want to talk about Anderson and Cahill. Giambi’s agent tells him big G wants to come back but needs a 3 year deal. Phone ringing again. Its Kinzer Furcal will come down to 48 million with player option on 5th year. Beane laughs.

by Arcman on Dec 7, 2008 6:17 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Then it starts raining and a frightened puppy dies

amidst the blackness that is my soul.

-Hemingway.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 6:19 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You suck at them?

I’ve been looking for Waldo all day – I am just now having breakfast.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 6:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

  Its called Mr beane takes a work trip.

by Arcman on Dec 7, 2008 6:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

possible SS trades

crosby- e. patterson-barton- h. rodriguez for S.Drew/JJ Hardy?

what do u guys think? giviing up too much, too little?

that's gold jerry, gold!!!

by 9Custs on Dec 7, 2008 6:21 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I'd say you'd have to replace Barton with a starting pitcher

to interest Milwaukee – they have Fielder and need pitching. You might also need to replace Crosby or Patterson with someone likely to be good at baseball.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 6:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think Hardy would be

a great option. He would be with the team for two more seasons giving guys like Cardenas/Leyja/Christian/Coleman time to be close, and he would provide good defense and likely more offense then Furcal would have. That said, it’s going to take the A’s giving up a couple guys that none of us are going to want to see go. I think a deal based around Mazzaro and Outman would have to be a start, and that’s if they don’t ask for Cahill/Anderson. Mazzaro + Outman + Doolittle or Carter would probably be about what the Brewers would want. Outman could step right into their rotation, and Mazzaro wouldn’t be far behind. Doolittle/Carter would provide insurance for when Fielder departs.

by JPShark on Dec 7, 2008 8:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

nico you're killing me tonight

ok is there a pitcher we can swap with barton to get those guys or should i just give up on this?

that's gold jerry, gold!!!

by 9Custs on Dec 7, 2008 6:28 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I'm not the best at trade proposals, but working from your list

maybe…Mazzaro, Crosby, H. Rodriguez, Donaldson? Ouch.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 6:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I would do that deal from the A's side

Getting rid of Crosby while selling high on the other 3? That sounds like a great deal for me.

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Dec 7, 2008 6:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

The only one of those I feel I’d miss is Donaldson, and I think he’s expendable under the right circumstances.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 7:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Donaldson's the ouch for me, but to get JJ Hardy

I’d be willing to deal with it.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 7:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Its wait and see on brewers

  If they resign CC and Sheets they will trade Fielder or Hardy. But that is a big if.

by Arcman on Dec 7, 2008 6:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wouldn't it be the opposite?

If they LOSE CC and Sheets, they should deal Hardy and rebuild because they won’t be contending the next couple years anyway.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 6:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

you're sort of right

if CC is signed, there is almost no chance they trade either F or H. As you say, if they don’t get a legitimate #1 or perhaps #2 pitcher, there is a good chance they’ll try and flip one of them for that 1 or 2.

by Lovejoy on Dec 8, 2008 9:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i doubt they resign either.

will get 4 picks i think, but will most likely be forced to deal hardy or fielder for a stud pitcher

that's gold jerry, gold!!!

by 9Custs on Dec 7, 2008 7:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd love to get JJ Hardy, but I don't love the potential cost to get him.

That, and I’m not sure how good he’d be in the AL, and he’s only under team control for 2 more years.

But I’ve already talked about wanting Asdrubal Cabrera. I think he’d take less to acquire and would potentially be a more valuable guy than Hardy anyways, albeit minus the HR power.

by mikev on Dec 7, 2008 8:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Stephen Drew's an interesting one to ponder

The A’s and Dbacks have a trading history and we all know Arizona needs to replenish its farm system…

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 8:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And, he'll get expensive in arbitration

and his agent is Boras so he’s not going to sign an extension w/ the DBacks.

For a team that’s cash strapped like the DBacks…

Although he is not good defensively at SS

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 8:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He slugged over .500 last year, so

I’ll take the Crosbonian defense!

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 8:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Why do you think he'd take less to acquire?

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 8:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree - I forgot Cabrera was only 22

with little service time. I think he’s pretty valuable.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 8:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure he even has 1 full service year used yet

Cot’s hasn’t updated for this season but he only used 55 service days last season.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 7, 2008 8:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Crosby

  He looks like the ugly girl that nobody wants to take to the prom. Everyone is trying to give him away at AN.

by Arcman on Dec 7, 2008 6:43 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

The ugly girl who also gives bad sex.

Ugly girls who give good sex are called sleepers.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 6:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's like a moped.

Fun to ride, but your friends laugh at you.

by mikev on Dec 7, 2008 7:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I thought that described the ugly girl who gives good sex

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 7:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So then you're the ugly guy with bad eyesight who gives good sex?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 7:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So you meant riding the little girl's bike with the pink basket with the flowers?

Pain in the ass to ride, and while it technically gets you where you’re going it’s not fun and you will get laughed at.

In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!

by DMOAS on Dec 7, 2008 8:45 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

A pain in the ass?

That reminds me of this joke about 3 nuns and a bike with no seat…

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 7, 2008 8:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

old joke

  Watch out for the cobble stone streets

by Arcman on Dec 7, 2008 8:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Variation...

If you don’t quit arguing I’ll put the seat back on.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 7, 2008 10:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Riding a sleeper does get you laughed at though.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 7:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Winter Meeting article by Urban on A's website

http://oakland.athletics.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081207&content_id=3705185&vkey=news_oak&fext=.jsp&c_id=oak

Last week, the agent for free-agent lefty Randy Johnson said the A’s have expressed interest in his client, but Beane said after the Holliday trade that he doesn’t plan to bolster his young and largely inexperienced rotation through Major League free agency.

“If we bring someone in,” Beane said, “it’ll probably be on a Minor League, make-the-team-first deal.”

by Trainman on Dec 7, 2008 6:56 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Interesting - I wonder who that would be

That would apply to Mulder (whom I don’t think the A’s will sign because the odds are too low that he can make 25-30 starts). Who else might accept a minor league deal?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 7:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

kevin correia!!

maybe another rehab guy like clement

loaiza!

by Asfan4ever723 on Dec 7, 2008 7:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Bartolo Colon!!!!!

But..but…seriously…the A’s need pitching.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 7:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Colon's not the worst idea in the world, actually

(Whereas Correia and Loaiza are!)

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 7:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeap.

He’s actually good when healthy.

And, he made starts this year.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 7:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Colon...

If he’s not clubhouse cancer,
then at least he’s clubhouse rickets…

"I have more questions after these."-WaddellCanseco

by Gaijin_Suketto on Dec 7, 2008 11:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Colon cancer?

Ugh. That’s wretched even by my standards.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 8, 2008 12:09 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

what downer compared to just a day or 2 ago

dreams of furcal, johnson…maybe more

now back to crosby and a scrap heap FA (mulder?)

unless beane is on the downlow and shocks us like the holliday deal

In addition to Furcal, whose demands may prove too high for Oakland’s tastes, there have been rumors linking the team to free-agent shortstop Orlando Cabrera and free-agent first baseman Jason Giambi.

by Asfan4ever723 on Dec 7, 2008 7:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's December, not February.

So much can happen between now and ST.

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 7:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Those quotes about only bringing in pitchers on "minor league deals" were made right after...

the Holliday trade press conference. That was weeks ago. RJ’s agent indicated that the A’s have expressed real, albeit preliminary, interest in the Big Unit a lot more recently than that. Beane likely meant what he said at the time, but he’s probably now altering course a little bit, which means that he’s still very much in the mix for RJ.

I'm never gonna do it without the fez on!

by Taj Adib on Dec 7, 2008 7:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Mmmmm...didn't know that.

Definitely nice to hear

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 7:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Right

  Beane changed his tune and is looking for a starter

by Arcman on Dec 7, 2008 8:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He probably wasn't expecting to have interested parties

that fit there needs in the FA markets when he made the original statement.

In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!

by DMOAS on Dec 7, 2008 8:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

oh no!

so you’re saying 2-3 more months of this! glad we have the niners, raiders, and warriors as great distractions to fill time

by Asfan4ever723 on Dec 7, 2008 7:04 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Dye deal is called BS.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/whitesox/chi-081207-chicago-white-sox-winter-meetings,0,7672373.story

Jon Garland, pleasepleaseplease accept arbitration. Your mad iNNiNgZ eAtEr sKiLLz will be greater exemplified in next year's free agent class. kthxbai.

by Blicks on Dec 7, 2008 7:08 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Why don't we three way with the Fathers and Brewers

We could possible even steal Denker or something, not to mention getting Hardy.

by Mulders Marauder on Dec 7, 2008 9:35 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

You had me at three-way

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 7, 2008 9:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Meh.

Priests and drunks don’t really do it for me.

"God doesn't pay attention to your cute little hypotheticals." -- Jeff from LL

by oblique on Dec 7, 2008 10:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You don't like Carmina burana, then?

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Dec 7, 2008 10:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Bold prediction:

A’s trade Brett Anderson, H-Rod, Donaldson and Cardenas for Hanley Ramirez and some Marlins minor league prospect.

You heard it here first.

"All your baserunner are belong to Greg Smith" ~ walk off bunt

by Philip Christy on Dec 8, 2008 2:30 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

And last.

Zing!

"To this day and dating back 25 years, before every game he plays, Henderson stands completely naked in front of a full length locker room mirror and says, "Ricky’s the best," for several minutes."

by VORP is too nerdy on Dec 8, 2008 3:13 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not enough for Florida.

Hell, that’s not even as much as we got for Haren.

by mikev on Dec 8, 2008 8:01 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

(Erk!)

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 8, 2008 8:29 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

My bold prediction

  The A’s get Jake Peavy for HRod, Cunningham, Petit, and Anderson

by Arcman on Dec 8, 2008 8:29 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

My bold prediction

Tejada returns, with Astros paying half his salary.

by HRH on Dec 8, 2008 9:20 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

My Bold prediction

We sign Furcal and RJ even after the posturing we’ve been hyperventilating about

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Dec 8, 2008 10:19 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

+1

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 8, 2008 12:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+2

Dude. This.

by Blicks on Dec 8, 2008 1:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Forget these bold predictions...

We got the real prize this offseason – Jerome Williams. We should be celebrating.

by MoneyManWilliam on Dec 8, 2008 3:09 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

how bout Tejada for Crosby, straight up?

we pay Tejada’s salary. The Astro’s pay BoCro’s.

They're called RUNS for a reason.

by connie mack on Dec 8, 2008 8:46 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

there seems to be a consensus on AN

that a free agent win added is worth about $4-5 million.
I think the A’s would be two wins better with Tejada replacing Crosby for an entire season.
Crosby makes $5 million this year. (Houston to pay)
Tejada makes $13 million this year. (Oakland to pay)
If that works out to a 2 win upgrade, it is the low end of market price. With the added advantage of no lost compensation picks, and possibly gaining one at the end of the year if Tejada leaves. That may be a slight possibility, but I think it is a zero possibility that Crosby is an A or B SS at the end of next year.
Plus there is the added benefit that Crosby KNOWS the A’s don’t want him, while Tejada would know the A’s wanted him back. I think there is an intangible upside.
I also think it would help attendance and team revenue.

They're called RUNS for a reason.

by connie mack on Dec 9, 2008 11:20 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I think the Astros would want another player to make that deal.

You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}

by micdog2001 on Dec 9, 2008 12:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

that could be, but it is probably just to save face

you could include Landon Powell, Matt Murton, Eric Patterson, etc. to complete it. or slightly adjust the dollars.

They're called RUNS for a reason.

by connie mack on Dec 9, 2008 12:59 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms
Start posting about the Athletics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Imgp0089_editedagasin_small
DLD 11/24/09 - Fine, I'll make another video game dump
Me_at_att_park_small
Greener Grass, Episode 7: Transportation Proclamation
Me_at_att_park_small
Old McPherson is an A, e yi e yi yoooooooo
Depaulbluedemons_small
Community Prospect List #18
413niegoftl__sl500_aa280__small
A's Protect Carter, FDLS, Figueroa and Souza from Rule V

Recent FanPosts

Small
The A's Move to Oakland in 1968
Funny-pictures12_small
If Jack Cust Traded, Then To Whom And For What?
Small
Jack Cust Drawing Trade Interest?
Countdown_small
Some things I am "coming around" on...
Bill_king_small
On Trading Catchers....

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Tyler_at_maya_school_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

As_kings_cal_small louismg

Editors

Countdown_small Taj Adib

Ziegler160px_small Flashfire

527918550406_0_bg_small notsellingjeans