Is Oakland Too Ghetto for Free Agents?
Fox Sports' Ken Rosenthal's latest column features some comments from an anonymous agent who seems to think so.
The A's rarely are major players in free agency, but the agent said that the poor working conditions and occasionally unruly crowd behavior at McAfee Coliseum are turnoffs for his clients.
"Many players are uncertain about the atmosphere," the agent said. "They're not as comfortable going to work there or having their families attend games there on a regular basis."
Column here.
The agent thinks that moving out of the Coliseum will help the team on this front. There's got to be other variables involved...I've never been to the clubhouses, but they can't be that bad. Similarly, A's fans have fun and get their drink on, but I've seen much more rude and obnoxious behavior in Chicago, Detroit, Boston, and New York...they seem to be able to draw free agents just fine.
In the end, I say if you don't want us, then we don't want you. Wimps.
4 recs |
205 comments
Comments
Rosenthal will report anything...
… the guy is an attention who*e and a mouthpiece for “anonymous sources” around the baseball world.
Who the hell cares what one scout thinks of Oakland? I’m sure if Rosenthal did any digging, he could find a scout who thought free agents didn’t want to sign in just about every MLB city. Rosenthal sought an explanation for Rafael Furcal turning down the A’s offer; this scout offered up his (anonymous) opinion; and Rosenthal printed it. Great reporting there Ken!!
Where was Rosenthal report on why Brian Giles exercised his no-trade clause to block a trade to Boston? I’m sure there was some larger pattern to that move as well… and yet, no anonymous source stories… Where’s this guy’s evidence that free agents don’t want to sign in Oakland? Just a “feeling” he has.
Ken Rosenthal is a good reporter as far as reporting baseball rumors and roster moves. Other than that, he’s a complete hack.
by Uncle Charlie on
Dec 18, 2008 6:28 AM PST
reply
actions
1 recs
Correction...
… it was an agent, not a scout. The point stands. What one agent thinks is not necessarily a representation of a broad cross-section of agents/players. Rosenthal is a hack.
by Uncle Charlie on
Dec 18, 2008 6:35 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Rosenthal reported the views of one prominent agent
That is it. He never said that what that agent believes is necessarily a representation of a broad cross section of players.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Dec 19, 2008 3:36 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I always remember.....
…….A’s crowds as being much better than Giants Candlestick-era crowds when I was growing up. A’s games had a fun friendly atmosphere with a mellow mix of upper middle class professionals and working class families. Whereas Giants games would be dominated by rowdy lower class drinkers. Even in recent years, though there has been a slight thuggish element that seems to be at games, they are still a tiny minority of the crowd. A Detroit Tigers fan friend of mine even wore his cap and jacket at one game and recieved only friendly needling for his apparel choices. Compare this to the thug-crowds at Dodger games or nasty masses in Boston, New York and Philly, and Oakland seems downright pleasant. Also, A’s players tend to live in the Walnut Creek/ Blackhawk areas. Hardly ghetto!
by may7 on
Dec 19, 2008 11:38 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
in high school, I played timpani for the Rowdy Lower Class Drinkers
I'll send you a postcard from Space Mountain. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Dec 19, 2008 12:03 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I've only been to the Coli once
but it seemed extremely family-friendly to me…
I could understand the argument that Oakland as a city isn’t terribly safe, but players don’t often live right within their team’s city limits, anyway. I’m sure there are plenty of mansions within commuting distance…
A's Strategy 2009: "Whoever is not hurt plays" - Syphon, 11/10/08
by schmifty on
Dec 18, 2008 6:56 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Although it's true
that Oakland has one of the higher crime rates in the nation, it’s worth pointing out (again) that there are two other MLB cities whose rates are higher (Detroit and St Louis).
"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk
by iglew on
Dec 18, 2008 9:03 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"We're not the worst. We're not the worst!"
Perhaps not the most inspiring cheer.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on
Dec 18, 2008 12:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
St Louis is very segregated. The stadium area is pretty safe on game nights, and no player would
live in the areas with high crime. Of course I’ve never felt unsafe at the Coliseum either.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 1:02 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Most of the crime in St. Louis
is concentrated in distinct areas, mainly North St. Louis and East Saint Louis on the Illinois side of the river. Players typically live in West County (Pujols) or 15-20 miles outside of St. Louis in Illinois (McGwire).
"To this day and dating back 25 years, before every game he plays, Henderson stands completely naked in front of a full length locker room mirror and says, "Ricky’s the best," for several minutes."
by VORP is too nerdy on
Dec 18, 2008 1:59 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Actually..
my uncle lives in the same neighborhood as Mike Shannon.
"To this day and dating back 25 years, before every game he plays, Henderson stands completely naked in front of a full length locker room mirror and says, "Ricky’s the best," for several minutes."
by VORP is too nerdy on
Dec 18, 2008 1:59 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
every major city is pretty well segregated
Oakland is one of the least segregated cities in the world and it’s still segregated.
by jdr on
Dec 18, 2008 2:12 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
By "world" do you mean "United States"?
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 2:16 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Baltimore has the highest murder rate in the US, last I checked
by thejd44 on
Dec 18, 2008 1:39 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And that's just Aubrey Huff and ground balls
Rimshot!
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on
Dec 18, 2008 7:24 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
One free agent
rejects the A’s and suddenly it’s the city of Oakland’s fault. Because, say, Frank Thomas, or Mike Piazza, or Alan Embree had such a big problem with the place.
RagingHarden: Yeah if you get 20 starts out of me I'll be shocked. Like, I'll wreck my drawers.
by walk off bunt on
Dec 18, 2008 7:15 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I can't imagine Frank Thomas having problems anywhere : -)
he’s the Big Hurt!
You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}
by micdog2001 on
Dec 18, 2008 12:26 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Add Loaiza to that list of free agents who had no problem with Oakland
by uci anteater on
Dec 18, 2008 4:03 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He can just speed away from his problems
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on
Dec 18, 2008 5:48 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed.
I won’t say that it had nothing to do with the city of Oakland, but I seriously doubt it is the primary reason. It’s obvious that Furcal had more ties to both Atlanta and the Dodgers.
by AEP2007 on
Dec 18, 2008 7:19 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I've never heard this brought up before by anybody in the extended MLB circle
and you obviously have to wonder if this is just Rosenthal blathering, or an agent who had a bad experience there one time, etc.
still, it doesn’t feel good to hear the Coliseum being talked about this way, and the whole Furcal visit did seem to give a bit of credence to this thought. Personally it makes me hope just a little bit more that the A’s get a new ballpark.
Save Rajai Davis
by oakinboston on
Dec 18, 2008 7:51 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
That comment about poor working conditions
is complete and utter bullshit! What the fuck does this guy know about working conditions? The A’s are a major league, professional franchise…..period! He makes it sound like the A’s are a bush league, fly by night operation. Say what you want about the Coliseum and us fans needing a shiny new stadium but I for one totally resent any kind of reference to A’s fans as hooligans or trouble makers. And the players are making their money regardless do you can throw that argument out the door as well. Real fans, like many who post here on AN, know exactly what I’m talking about.
The only thing that even remotely bothers me as an A’s fan is when I’m tailgating, being approached by folks asking me for money or something. Other than that, the Coliseum is cool….old, yes……outdated, yes…..rugged, yes…….but I have a great time at every A’s game and I don’t think the players have a problem being paid professionals either. By the way, the field, when the Raiders are not sharing with the A’s, is among the best and well kept in all of baseball, thank you very much.
Ken Rosenthal, kiss my skinny brown ass, you shite!
Go A’s!
by mrod on
Dec 18, 2008 8:04 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
To Play Devil's Advocate
The “amenities” at the coliseum for players are sub standard. Mainly the club house, the weight rooms, those sort of things that are a key component of the working conditions for players.
You could argue that a barbell is a barbell regardless of the environment around the barbell. You could argue that when Rocky Balboa had the nicest place to work out and Clubber Lang was in a room full of pipes and steam that Clubber whooped his A%$!
What a difference a couple of decades makes. All the new stadiums have raised the bar on what is “standard.”
The stuff about fans, is probably a bit over the top. Oakland has a reputation for not attracting the most knowledgeable and sophisticated fan base. Personally, since i am one fo those fans, I think that si hog wash :)
And as far as Furcal… did he spurn Atlanta for their substandard facilities or what?
by jeffro on
Dec 18, 2008 8:46 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It seems a lot more likely Furcal was expecting a higher offer from the A's than he got, and
just waited for one of his more familiar teams to top that. They did. If the A’s had offered $43M or $46M including vesting options in the first place, he may well have signed weeks ago. Most likely it wasn’t worth it to them to offer that.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 1:06 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It was worth it to them to offer that...
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Dec 18, 2008 1:10 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah but how much would Clubber Lang be worth?
by jeffro on
Dec 18, 2008 1:12 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
don't do it rocky, he'll murdah yah
alaska A residing in colorado.
by ak_A on
Dec 18, 2008 4:48 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I meant in their opinion it wasn't worth it to them to offer that.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 2:37 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Just nitpicking here, but, you could argue that a barbell is a barbell is a barbell
You would be (very) wrong.
Just as with everything else, quality matters, when talking about barbells. There are world class hand made barbells, that are used in the Olympics, such as from companies like Eleiko. And then there is the crap that you buy at walmart.
And then there is the issue with how well the barbells are maintained. Are they regularly oiled? Do the sleeves rotate smoothly, as a result of regular oiling?
Yes, yes, I know this bores the tears out of everyone else.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Dec 19, 2008 3:47 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Did you even read the article?
Rosenthal is simply reporting the views of one agent.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Dec 19, 2008 3:41 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Kinzer excuse
If I was to bet who gave him the info its Kinzer. Probabaly went like this. Why didn’t you take the oakland offer? Kinzer responds Oakland is to tough of a area for Furcal to attend. The place scares him more then poverty place he lives now aka DR. If you ever been to other stadium you would know this is a bunch of crap. Yanks, Mets, Phillies, Washington and ect.. are not in the best places but money talks.
by Arcman on
Dec 18, 2008 8:19 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Did Ken Rosenthal write this, or Ed Werder?
The Coliseum is not the best place to play. We get that. They need a new place.
As for a fan-friendly place, it’s pretty good. Our fans support our players unless they’re really not doing well. In spite of a few bad incidents with things being thrown or the occasional fight in the seats, it’s not like players need to fear for their safety here. I can vouch for the fact that some of the bleacher guys have had good, funny exchanges with players on opposing teams who get what’s going on. Many A’s fans also know the game’s nuances well.
The area around the Coliseum? No, it’s not very good. Parts of Oakland have a very bad crime rate. That doesn’t mean the whole city is a cesspool and is only there to get away from. There are worse places to go to. Most players don’t live in Oakland anyway.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on
Dec 18, 2008 8:31 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed. And, parts of every big city have a very bad crime rate.
"And you just don't get it, you keep it copacetic..."
by Blicks on
Dec 18, 2008 9:08 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We've had a couple of high-profile incidents in the stadium
That I think don’t represent the crowd at large. The Rangers chair throwing thing, the people who threw the quarters are Ichiro, etc. I wonder where these people come from because since the heyday of the late 80s the Oakland crowds have been pretty tepid on a whole (and sparse).
by jdr on
Dec 18, 2008 9:13 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No players were endangered by fans during the chair throwing incident ...
"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback
by devo on
Dec 18, 2008 10:50 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i was at the game about 10 rows up from where it happened
and i have to say, that was one of the craziest things i have ever seen. As sad as it was that it had to happen, it was pretty awesome from a fans perspective. Plus, I was on the sportscenter for like 3 days in a row.
"I think people in this state like BOTH teams," proclaims Nick Aliotti, the Ducks' defensive coordinator. "Except for our hard-core fans, I don't think most Duck fans would have been terribly upset to see Oregon State going to the Rose Bowl."
Another reason he needs to go.
by diehardoaklandfan22 on
Dec 18, 2008 12:03 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
who cares whether players were endangered?
It was still a big black eye. Somebody obviously antagonized the hell out of the Rangers bullpen. It’s not the point anyway, the point is that there have been high-profile negative events in recent years that have made the Oakland fanbase look bad. Players are never really endangered in any stadium other than the one incident in Chicago. Ichiro wasn’t going to be knocked unconscious by a few quarters. But it still makes us look bad, even though as stated I think the A’s crowds are on a whole pretty mellow in comparison to other stadiums. But we’ve got a few black marks recently that for various reasons have become a big deal.
by jdr on
Dec 18, 2008 1:37 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and to clarify
I don’t think the A’s fans are a reason why we don’t get free agents. We don’t get free agents because we never offer the most money (Furcal being the possible exception). And in terms of whatever auxiliary reasons might be part of it, the stadium itself, the stadium site, the small fan base, the second city factor, low marketability, that the A’s aren’t really seen as contenders, and a few other factors are still ahead way ahead of any “unruly fan” quotient there is. If the A’s were offering Teixeira $30m a year he would already have signed. All other conditions are secondary.
by jdr on
Dec 18, 2008 1:44 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
not 100% sure here
but with incentives, the dodgers deal was worth more than the a’s deal. just backing your point up even more
"My group runs some frogloks down the hall to finish them off and POP! RASTER! If there was a way to scream louder than caps in EQ I was doing it. Man I am straight panicking because I know I have NO CHANCE soloing and the party has run off. I'm in my hotel room; it's like 5am, and I am straight hollering, in EQ and in real life. Bottom line is the group comes back, heals me, and kills Raster! WOOT!" -Curt Schilling on his favorite memories in the video game "EverQuest"
by travdog6 on
Dec 18, 2008 1:49 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But it was incentives that put the deal over the top for the Dodgers.
If Furcal does not get the minimum amout of plate apperances then the 12 million for 2012 does not happen.
by mrod on
Dec 18, 2008 6:58 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
600 plate appearances to be exact.
And, I don’t know for sure what the details may have been with the A’s 4 yr deal, but if it was indeed guaranteed for the 4th year and no b.s. or incentives to get the 4th year money, then Furcal and his agent are both complete fucking morons…….just my two cents.
by mrod on
Dec 18, 2008 7:07 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Whatever the details, if that's what Furcal wanted and the A's were willing
to pay it, they should have. The fact that they didn’t offer it makes me think that they weren’t willing to go that high.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 7:13 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
4 years-38 million at least, guaranteed
from what we have read. That’s still 38 million for 4 years, like I said, no strings attached to the best of our knowledge, and Furcal never even considered it?
Idiot…………just laughable.
by mrod on
Dec 18, 2008 7:16 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ya but Furcal may have wanted more money and was willing to accept less guarantees
It doesn’t sound like the A’s were willing to do that
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 9:24 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
which really makes no sense at all
other than he just wanted to say with the Dodgers……period!
by mrod on
Dec 18, 2008 11:07 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This came up in another thread
and there were varied responses but any true A’s fan that goes to the games knows the ins and outs of the Coli…….
It is what it is and I think we all just make the best of it. We’re not the ones getting paid all of the money…..the players are!
Yeesh!
by mrod on
Dec 18, 2008 8:34 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
the sorts of reactions in this thread are when I start to think that maybe PT is right about the second-person plural ...
I'll send you a postcard from Space Mountain. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Dec 18, 2008 9:35 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
QOTM
I'll send you a postcard from Space Mountain. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Dec 19, 2008 10:26 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
jeez, I'm an idiot
first-person plural
I'll send you a postcard from Space Mountain. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Dec 19, 2008 10:26 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
True, it's not like I'm crusading against the use of "youse guys" and "y'all"
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Dec 19, 2008 10:55 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
FAIL
Your response was supposed to be “YOU’RE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!”
I'll send you a postcard from Space Mountain. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Dec 19, 2008 11:10 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think there's a huge difference between what goes on inside the park and outside in the surrounding metropolis.
And I also think Ken Rosenthal has looked really bad throughout this whole Furcal thing.
by thejd44 on
Dec 18, 2008 9:47 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Sorry, guys
But this article brings up a disturbing truth. Oakland is not an attractive place to play, and the stadium is substandard. I don’t live in Oakland but I’ve been to games there in recent years and you just can’t compare the stadium to something like Dodger Stadium or Turner Field or many others. The stadium is old: too old to look shiny and new but not so old that it becomes charming. It’s not going to attract any player the way that, say, Camden Yards is going to. It was acceptable in the late 80s but it’s not now. Get high and mighty about it if you want, but it’s the truth.
The area around the stadium also is not appealing. Again, in the 60s, it was fine, but it’s no longer … not when you have beautiful stadiums in city centers like Petco or Busch.
There’s probably a reason why Billy never goes after big name free agents. They have better options! If a guy gets traded to the A’s, they end up loving it (generally). But ask Furcal to devote the next 4 years to Oakland when he can live in LA, why are you surprised he chose LA?
This whole escapade exposed a dirty truth: we’re going to have trouble getting top notch free agents here without a new stadium in a new part of town. And don’t say anything about Big Frank and Piazza: these were old players looking for their last contract who had NO other offers. They loved us because we loved them first and they appreciated that. No guy with multiple suitors is going to come here without a really compelling reason to do so (they’re from here, they were traded here and like it, etc.)
by Crosbino on
Dec 18, 2008 9:52 AM PST
reply
actions
1 recs
I think you're making it out to be a lot worse than it actually is.
Oakland’s not the greatest place, but it’s also not a complete shithole like people have been making it out to be.
by mikev on
Dec 18, 2008 10:16 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not saying it's a shithole
Just saying considering where the stadium is, and considering how unfavorably it compares to stadiums in beautiful, revitalized city centers, it doesn’t measure up. I think we’d all admit that, right?
The Bay Area as a whole is nice, but Helgenburger lane and the Oakland airport are not.
by Crosbino on
Dec 18, 2008 10:19 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it's not a dangerous area...
It might not be beautiful but a lot has been done around the airport in recent years to improve the area. and it’s not the area because the Warriors seem to be doing fine in Oracle…
by stranahanahan on
Dec 18, 2008 10:42 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't think Crosbino is saying it is a dangerous place
But if you add together an old stadium, ruined by Football. A crowd that gets falsely connected with the Raiders. An area that’s seen better days (not a bad area, but it looks more like an industrial zone than a up and coming city center). All three together paints an unattractive picture. If any one of those things changed and things might be different (hence the reason why players who come here end up really liking it). But the A’s are like that plain looking girl in highschool who gets ignored waiting for people to realize that under that plainness she’s hot as hell and really fun to be around.
In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!
by DMOAS on
Dec 18, 2008 10:48 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Like that girl in that movie......
“She’s All That”?
by AEP2007 on
Dec 18, 2008 11:01 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Let's not kid ourselves.
The area around the Coli is bad. The venue itself is bad by modern standards.
The thing is, LAPD police academy non withstanding, Chavez ravine isn’t exactly a glamor area either.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on
Dec 18, 2008 11:09 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But the area around the park is completely irrelevent to the players ...
it’s right next to the freeway with (at the time they are coming and going) very easy access and they park in a well secured parking lot. There would be no reason for them to ever even see San Leandro Blvd …
"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback
by devo on
Dec 18, 2008 11:44 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Granted.
So why does the agent make such a statement? No player is going to stroll around outside the Coli or in Chavez latrine. You would think that Fucal would realize that Oakland’s chances of reaching the WS are far superior to LA’s. Who knows, maybe the “crowd energy” means more to these guys than I realize.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on
Dec 18, 2008 12:04 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It sounds like Furcal likes to be in familiar surroundings. He's familiar with LA and Atl ...
both in terms of the people and the geography, having played in both for several years and he’s worked with and likes the executives in KC.
"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback
by devo on
Dec 18, 2008 12:47 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Also the Dodgers offered the most money including incentives.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 1:08 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Then they should just say that
Would anybody here have a gripe with a guy wanting to stay with his current team or returning to the team that signed him as a 17 19 year old?
Essentially saying “Oakland sucks” is a pretty crappy thing to do if that’s not the reason the player gave.
I think all we’ve learned from this is that Kinzer is a douche. What he did to Frank Wren was even worse than how he played Oakland. He told Wren to draw up a contract. Wren signed the contract. That’s not posturing. That’s bad business. I would LOVE to see all of Kinzer’s free agents get screwed because of this.
by thejd44 on
Dec 18, 2008 1:44 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
good news
"My group runs some frogloks down the hall to finish them off and POP! RASTER! If there was a way to scream louder than caps in EQ I was doing it. Man I am straight panicking because I know I have NO CHANCE soloing and the party has run off. I'm in my hotel room; it's like 5am, and I am straight hollering, in EQ and in real life. Bottom line is the group comes back, heals me, and kills Raster! WOOT!" -Curt Schilling on his favorite memories in the video game "EverQuest"
by travdog6 on
Dec 18, 2008 1:46 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
In negotiations you don't want to completely lay your cards on the table ...
but that’s basically what he has said. Oakland was his fourth choice and he preferred LA, KC and Atl for the reasons I mentioned above.
"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback
by devo on
Dec 18, 2008 2:05 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Old stadium built for football
Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!
by Monday Fan on
Dec 18, 2008 4:19 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Shea stadium is also pretty damn substandard
FAs aren’t exactly avoiding the Mets.
Furcal doesn’t have to live in Oakland. He can live in SF.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Dec 19, 2008 3:53 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the mets
are about to move into a new stadium, have you seen the renderings? gorgeous.
by MaineAthletic on
Dec 21, 2008 11:05 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Why bother posting...
We need a new stadium, no shit. The Coliseum is still a somewhat charming ballpark where you can go and enjoy a game without getting overloaded by non-baseball related digital advertising, crowd applause prompting, and jumbo-screen corporate antics every second of the game like Dodger Stadium and Anaheim stadium.
Your statement that free agents won’t play in Oakland because of the surrounding area is retarded Crosbino. The area surrounding Dodger Stadium includes a park with a police academy, middle to low income housing, a somewhat run-down section of Sunset Blvd, and a very non-modern China Town. No Dodger player has ever been spotted in any bar, restaurant, patch of grass, or anywhere else in the area surrounding Dodger Stadium.
by jdub69 on
Dec 19, 2008 11:54 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
First off, I can say I've seen way worse incidents in several other stadiums...
I’ve had to deal with some HORRIBLE fans down in Anaheim. At least most A’s fans are going to watch the game. I can’t tell you how many Angels fans just get drunk and try to cause shit, they are ridiculous. I mean, half those guys leave the stadium by the 5th inning anyway. And Boston? New York? LA? C’mon, I would say the fans there are worse, and have caused plenty more problems. Hell, a couple people died at Dodgers stadium the last few years.
ya know, i understand that the A’s do need to move, but before Mount Davis was added, no one was complaining about the Coliseum. Suddenly it’s a shit hole?
Whatever, like I’ve said before, those guys can kiss my ass if they don’t want to be hear. they’re missing out. No other clubhouse in the bigs year in and year out shows that they are here to have fun like the A’s…
by stranahanahan on
Dec 18, 2008 10:01 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Couple things
It’s not about the fans … it’s the whole environment. In terms of fans, for what it’s worth, it’s less the quality of fan but the quantity. Come to Oakland, know you’re playing in front of small houses. Like it or not, though, perhaps Anaheim fans are drunk sorority girls, but if you’re a baseball player, you want drunk sorority girls ogling you. So you might hate that, but players do not.
Your comment about Mt Davis: no one was complaining back then? That was, what, 1994? That was 15 years ago, and even without Mt. Davis, people would be complaining about the Coli now because it just can’t compare to new stadiums in terms of overall charm. Again, not old enough to be Wrigley, not fancy enough to be PNC.
People here need to get over themselves. We love the A’s … but we can’t expect players to come here just because we love the A’s. There’s not enough here to draw them in.
by Crosbino on
Dec 18, 2008 10:08 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
rosenthal's article didn't say a thing about fan quantity
it said “the occasional unruly fan.” And if you’ve been to Edison Field, you will realize it’s not drunk sorority girls. It’s middle aged guys getting drunk and causing shit. and not caring about the game. i dunno about you, but if i was a baseball player, i wouldn’t want middle aged fat guys ogling me. I hate that, and players do too (surprise!).
and I don’t need to get over myself, we’re not here saying that Oakland is a palace and players need to come here because I love the A’s. I get the point, and like I said in my last post, the A’s do need to move. what I mean about Mount Davis is that if Oakland Coliseum still stood today as it did before that monstrosity was added, I don’t think the complaints would be nearly as bad as they are. Sure, we would still have an outdated park, but it wouldn’t be this bad. And with Mt Davis came Raiders fans, and you can’t honestly say that A’s fans have suffered from the rap that Raiders fans carry. To the average sports fan from another area, it just looks like all Oakland fans are rough motherfuckers.
And we cannot expect players to come here, no one is saying that. we’re just protecting our park…
by stranahanahan on
Dec 18, 2008 10:41 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Fine. Protect your park.
I just feel like A’s fans often want it both ways: they want their quaint park with an intimate atmosphere and cheap tickets but they also want big name free agents to sign here. It’s not going to happen.
Billy only went after Furcal because he figured (rightly) that he would not have to get into a bidding war. He offered a market value contract when no one else was willing to pay that. Had Furcal not prodded LA and ATL, he WOULD have signed with the A’s. However, as soon as it became a real competition, then the A’s couldn’t win.
We got Big Frank because though he was a “big signing” for us, he wasn’t a big signing. If the Yankees offered him regular playing time, he would have signed there. We gave him something he didn’t get from anyone else.
With most free agents, however, we can throw a competitive offer at them, but they’re not going to come here unless they have a damn good reason for doing so. We need to build through the draft, through trades, and through shrewd signings of guys like Frank. That’s probably the reality now.
by Crosbino on
Dec 18, 2008 11:05 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"quaint"? "intimate"?
Those words don’t mean what you think they do.
I'll send you a postcard from Space Mountain. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Dec 18, 2008 11:07 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Intimate atmosphere.
I’d like to keep baseball and intimacy separate, thank you.
"To this day and dating back 25 years, before every game he plays, Henderson stands completely naked in front of a full length locker room mirror and says, "Ricky’s the best," for several minutes."
by VORP is too nerdy on
Dec 18, 2008 2:14 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So the new A's collection at Victoria's Secret isn't for you?
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 2:17 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We're not selling bras here
I'll send you a postcard from Space Mountain. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Dec 18, 2008 2:50 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You killed my fantasy team. Prepare to be DFA'ed.
I'll send you a postcard from Space Mountain. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Dec 18, 2008 12:51 PM PST
up
reply
actions
1 recs
and i'm not arguing with that, you are completely correct
we aren’t going to get the free agents, and that’s ok. Billy Beane knows that, we as fans know that. His best bet is doing exactly those 3 things, and then after trades hoping that those guys then really enjoy the atmosphere. And again, I know the A’s need to move, I do, I’m not arguing that, I’m just saying that Rosenthal paints a relatively unfair picture for those who haven’t been here.
by stranahanahan on
Dec 18, 2008 11:11 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If the Yankees offer any player
regular playing time, that player is going to sign there in most cases. Simply because the Yankees usually also offer the most money.
As for the park and cheap tickets, Shea Stadium is also a crappy park. One reason Mets fans love it is because of the cheap tickets. The fact that one can go drop by and watch a game, at a good price, if one has some free time.
Are FAs avoiding signing with the Mets because of Shea?
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Dec 19, 2008 3:57 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i really
only care about the cheap tickets. atmosphere comes from successful teams. playoff games/pennant races have always had a great atmosphere (especially if we can get the tarp to come down)
by MaineAthletic on
Dec 21, 2008 11:06 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't know what I'd be thinking right now if the Coliseum remained as it had been
I loved the old bleachers, the stairs to the ground level you could race down for home runs, the view of the Oakland hills, and all that. Having been to other ballparks, I think I’d still want a stadium that had seats closer to the infield, though.
But it’d definitely be a much nicer place with a fence that was normal instead of the way it’s forced to be now because of the permanent seats out there.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on
Dec 18, 2008 4:52 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Disagree on the Mt Davis point...
Try to follow along…
No Mount Davis likely means the Raiders did not move back to Oakland. No Raiders moving to Oakland, Coliseum gutting and renovation for baseball occurs, no thrashed outfield in September, and A’s have a modern baseball stadium in Oakland.
So, without Mt Davis no one would be complaining about the Coliseum.
by Donner on
Dec 18, 2008 8:47 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Except the owners still wouldn't have their luxury boxes
It would be similar to St Louis — a perfectly serviceable park but no boxes.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 9:25 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Did any of you guys realize that reztips had become an agent? I had no idea.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on
Dec 18, 2008 10:34 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
For someone who maybe had 100 posts 3 years ago, this guy is remembered pretty well
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 1:11 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I have no idea what you're talking about.
by mikev on
Dec 18, 2008 1:55 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
There was a short-lived poster named "reztips" who antagonized a number of people
before being banned. He was extremely vocal about the A’s need to move to the South Bay to escape the urban blight that is (perceived to be) Oakland.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 2:06 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I cannot comment on the Coli itself because I have never been there
but the small crowd factor has been mentioned by quite a few players and for the good of the team, we need the new ballpark.
If an agent mentioned this then he has had his clients mention it so the bottom line is the team can do a hell of a lot better somewhere else. Now most players (I would think) would look at the quality of the team, the way it is run and the $$$ they receive and then make their decision from there.
If I was a player I would not care if I played in a shitbox as long as I had a chance to win, had good teammates and enjoyed myself in the process.
But like I said, for the good of the team and it’s future, they need to get the hell out of there and into a new ballpark
by Trainman on
Dec 18, 2008 10:36 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
But the shitbox, small crowds and resulting small revenue might make you think that you had a better
chance to win in a place with bigger crowds and better atmosphere.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 1:13 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Stupid. Ridiculous statement.
Thes comments in the article are innane. The so-called “crowds” are not unruly. That is just an idiotic and uneducated statement. Pure fiction. The usual 12k people for most home games are far from unruly. What the hell was the motivation for making this statement?
As for the Coli it is a dive. No way around that. And Oakland has shady parts like any other major city. Been to LA? NY? I defy you to show me a major metropolitan city without a ghetto. The stadium is not right in the ghetto. Close, but not. It is by a major airport and freeway. Not a garden spot, but mostly light industrial area.
I would not be overly excited about playing there either. It has to feel somewhat like baseball banishment to play in a drab stadium, in a market that does not have a large fanbase and is often overshadowed in the media.
But to say the crowds are unruly is stupid. Bad journalist.
I dream of Fremont and rainbows
by OptimistPrime on
Dec 18, 2008 10:56 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
the BART station is in the middle of a ghetto
Hoo boy. I grew up playing in the Babe Ruth League right there and I saw some things.
by jdr on
Dec 18, 2008 1:53 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah ...
I had a couple of games there interrupted by gunshots … yet, oddly, I never felt unsafe …
"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback
by devo on
Dec 18, 2008 2:08 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
All that means is that your probably
haven’t seen many gun shot victims up close and personal. It’s silly sometimes, a massive gory wound leaves a few scars but isn’t fatal. On the other hand, a small hole you could fit a pencil eraser into drops a person dead where they stand. Better yet, a head shot where the energy of the round is absorbed by the skull. Makes an interesting looking pumpkin head. It’s always fatal as far as I know.
Moral of the story, flying bullets are very bad news. Especially if you are unfortunate enough to stop one.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on
Dec 18, 2008 3:34 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes, as a young child, I only was in a position to duck and cover when gun shots went off ...
not to actually see the results … what a sublimely innocent childhood I lived.
But, yes, while I find yours an odd response, flying bullets are bad news.
"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback
by devo on
Dec 19, 2008 1:26 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Babe Ruth league
At the time we had a gunshot rule, which was that a single outburst meant only that everyone had to duck and cover, and when they were over the game would be resumed. But a second round meant the game was automatically suspended and everyone had to go home. It was very neat and logical. I personally only saw one person actually get shot there and weirdly it wasn’t that traumatic. When you’re 12 sometimes things have a way of rolling off you.
And to get back to the original statement, the field is walking distance from the Coliseum (a walk which I made more than once) and it’s through a terrible neighborhood.
Also weirdly, this guy used to be my coach.
by jdr on
Dec 19, 2008 9:50 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This guy used to be my team's sponsor ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9nptjUs9FM
Yeah, it’s about a half mile to the BART ramp … I don’t think I ever made the walk, though …
"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback
by devo on
Dec 19, 2008 12:01 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My personal choice for the "Worst Rendition of the National Anthem Ever"
sung by that guy at the Coli.
This party's over
by lynnzgal on
Dec 19, 2008 7:19 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
lol...not at all.
You’re statement about not feeling any sense of danger struck me as a little odd. Gunfire scares the living hell out of me.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on
Dec 19, 2008 7:12 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wimp.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on
Dec 19, 2008 7:42 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Huh.
I hate the idea of being laid out on a slab while some orderly lays his cigarette down on my forehead while he hits on the receptionist.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on
Dec 19, 2008 7:55 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Then hire an ugly receptionist - problem solved!
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on
Dec 19, 2008 8:04 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dunno bout that....
cause you know you’re going to be butt ass naked under the sheet. So if he isn’t trying to get in her panties, he’ s going to be amusing himself with her at your expense. You know, little jokes while lifting up the sheet…..
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on
Dec 19, 2008 8:06 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Read the Farking Article
Rosenthal is simply saying that ONE agent said that.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Dec 19, 2008 3:59 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m curious if Rosenthal has ever been to the Coliseum. I know it wasn’t him saying those things, but he still printed it, and if he doesn’t necessarily agree with it he shouldn’t print it…
by stranahanahan on
Dec 18, 2008 11:05 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Rosenthal should only report the views
that he agrees with?
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Dec 19, 2008 4:00 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
no, but he reported this like a fact
you say he reported it as the views of one agent. That’s not exactly how I viewed it. It appeared that he said it like there’s no way around this harsh reality
by stranahanahan on
Dec 19, 2008 11:04 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Has said agent not been to Detroit? If you want to talk about hole
you talk about Detroit (think downtown hi-rises with shit hanging out the broken windows). They sure as hell havent had trouble upping their payroll the last couple of years. Sure, they have a newer stadium, but if it’s the stadium then KC, Old Yankee, Shea, etc beat the A’s on that front.
Whoever this source is is full of shit. Either that or some suburban raised wuss. I’m a practicing attorney with kids and have no problem taking my family to an A’s game.
The bottom line is Money Talks.
by 33SwisherSweet on
Dec 18, 2008 11:24 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
KC has an excellent baseball stadium, my favorite from the 1960s - 70s era.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 1:14 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, but it's not super modern and I'm sure it doesn't have the best facilities for players
to train in. It’s quasi minor league in its feel and that is the beauty of it.
My point is that the source is a moron. Sure Oakland may not be the best, but it’s by far not the worst.
by 33SwisherSweet on
Dec 18, 2008 1:42 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
KC's stadium was upgraded extensively in the 90s IIRC
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Dec 19, 2008 4:01 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't know about player facilities, but...
…I went to a game in KC a few years ago and I thought it was a very nice stadium.
"If I've got baggage, he's got a whole set of Louis Vuitton." ~ Milton Bradley on Barry Bonds
by UncleLeo on
Dec 19, 2008 11:35 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Indeed
There’s nothing minor league about KC’s ballpark. It’s excellent.
Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!
by Monday Fan on
Dec 21, 2008 2:29 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm glad somebody brought this up
Detroit has all the charm of Stalingrad in the mid-40s yet free agents sign with the Tigers. It’s a non-issue. Players are picky sometimes and they have their reasons. Maybe it’s the ballpark. Maybe it’s the low attendance. Maybe it’s the weather. Maybe he thinks Oakland isn’t going to contend. If that’s what he thinks, fine. I’ll get concerned about it when the A’s homegrown talent can’t wait to get out of Oakland because they don’t like it here.
Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!
by Monday Fan on
Dec 18, 2008 4:32 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Are you sure he wasn't talking about
A typical Raider game?
It’s a completely different environment.
All Games and Comments are Subject to Blackout
by Hit4TheCycle on
Dec 18, 2008 12:21 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Raider games arent that bad.
Some people need to live less coddled lives and come out of their shells. You don’t know what you are missing otherwise.
by 33SwisherSweet on
Dec 18, 2008 1:43 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Raider games are pretty tepid too
They’re living off their 70s/80s reputation in terms of how “dangerous” they are. They dress up and they’re loud, but they’re not throwing corpses onto the field.
by jdr on
Dec 18, 2008 1:49 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
that may be true
but as a Broncos fan I would never feel comfortable showing up in Orange & Blue, and I think that’s a shame.
"Don't be an ass!" --Bill King
by batgirl on
Dec 18, 2008 2:48 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think that's pretty common in the NFL, though
What would happen to a Raider fan in silver&black at Mile High (do the Bronco’s still play there?)?
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on
Dec 18, 2008 2:59 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Fancy New Mile High (meaning worse)
Honestly, unless they were looking for a fight, I don’t think they would have a problem. I went to a game at arrowhead in Broncos gear with other Broncos fans and while there was some good natured back and forth ribbing, it was a very fun experience.
BTW Arrowhead is a great place to see a game.
"Don't be an ass!" --Bill King
by batgirl on
Dec 18, 2008 7:24 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Kansas City is famously nice, though
I live near Philly now. Philly fans say that they didn’t really boo Santa, but they’ll happily cop to harassing Giants and Cowboys fans at any opportunity. There was a really ugly incident at Giants’ Stadium during a Jets game, IIRC, last year — though I think that was some horrible sexual harassment thing.
Basically, football + lots of beer = big potential for problems.
But I suppose Broncos fans save their snowball tossing for the players on the field, not the fans, huh? ;)
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on
Dec 18, 2008 8:34 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good. Keep it that way.
Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!
by Monday Fan on
Dec 18, 2008 4:33 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No, I think Al Davis is the one who's responsible for the corpses on the field.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on
Dec 18, 2008 2:58 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
perception
If this truly is the perception among players who’ve had little contact with the A’s or the coliseum, this is where the current players need to get involved. Chavez, etc. need to call potential free agents and tell them their experience with the organization, fans, etc. Let them know what the reality is and all the things they will LOVE about playing for the A’s.
Oh how I wish the Raiders had not returned from LA. No Mt. Davis, and no crappy field from Mid-August on. Because up until mid-August, come to Oakland and you’ll be playing on the nicest freaking grass in the league thanks to Clay Wood.
"Don't be an ass!" --Bill King
by batgirl on
Dec 18, 2008 12:38 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
perhaps emphasizing the quality of the "grass" isn't the best message to counterposition Oakland's "ghetto" rep ...
I'll send you a postcard from Space Mountain. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Dec 18, 2008 12:53 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I also mentioned the beautiful field conditions pre-Raider season
in another comment earlier. Clay Wood is the man!
by mrod on
Dec 18, 2008 7:13 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But...
Can you go out, play 36 holes and then come home and get stoned to the bejeezus belt on the stuff?
by jeffro on
Dec 19, 2008 9:40 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Only Wilt Chamberlain can play 36 holes in one day
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on
Dec 19, 2008 9:26 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Listen to Crosbino,
he knows what is up. You have to put yourself in a player’s shoes and realize that you would like to play somewhere that is exciting and has management that can go out and get big names. If you come to the A’s you can expect lots of turnover, things done on the cheap, meager crowds, and an uninspiring ballpark. Don’t get me wrong, I love the A’s. But we need to be a little more realistic about this whole free agent thing. The Twins are no different than us. They also can’t get free agents. They are also cheap with a great minor league system. With that stated, we know that Matt Holliday WILL be traded at the deadline so Billy can replace who he gave up to get him. Then we can start more flow charts stating how the Mark Mulder trade is still paying dividends! The only problem is we can’t win a championship….
by pedoman on
Dec 18, 2008 1:10 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes, it's obvious Holliday was acquired so that he could be un-acquired
What other explanation could there possibly be? It’s not like it’d be much simpler to just not get him in the first place, or anything.
Beane actually enjoys fucking with us. His entire purpose in life is not to win baseball games, but to fool people into thinking he wants to win baseball games. I hear he actually derives sexual pleasure from not winning championships.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Dec 18, 2008 1:15 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It might have been simpler to not acquire him, but he may have more deadline value than
Street and Gonzalez, especially to get a SS.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 1:17 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How did you hear this, exactly?
Or do we want to know?
"To this day and dating back 25 years, before every game he plays, Henderson stands completely naked in front of a full length locker room mirror and says, "Ricky’s the best," for several minutes."
by VORP is too nerdy on
Dec 18, 2008 2:17 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
pedoman and I actually go to the same spiritualist
In my case, I communed with the spirit of his old guinea pig, who he sexually assaulted and murdered six years ago.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Dec 18, 2008 2:29 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ahhhh
Dayton Moore revealed!
"I'm on hold for now"- Bobby Crosby
by DyeLongJustice on
Dec 18, 2008 6:33 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I thought Holliday would be traded too till Wolff said he wouldn't prefer that.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 1:15 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You are right,
and Furcal is still going to sign with us because we offered the most money.
by pedoman on
Dec 18, 2008 1:16 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
It's amusing that the A's are simultaneously "too white" and "too ghetto"
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 1:17 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
The A's are too white, but Oakland is too ghetto, and never the 2 shall meet.
by theblackpearl on
Dec 18, 2008 1:20 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
what if we sign Ty Wigginton?
I'll send you a postcard from Space Mountain. @('.')@
by monkeyball on
Dec 18, 2008 1:24 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
is he half white half ghetto?
Is that like a ghelatto?
by jeffro on
Dec 18, 2008 1:34 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
well i can understand a nice, upstanding man like furcal wanting to avoid crummy oakland
its not like hes ever been in jail
"My group runs some frogloks down the hall to finish them off and POP! RASTER! If there was a way to scream louder than caps in EQ I was doing it. Man I am straight panicking because I know I have NO CHANCE soloing and the party has run off. I'm in my hotel room; it's like 5am, and I am straight hollering, in EQ and in real life. Bottom line is the group comes back, heals me, and kills Raster! WOOT!" -Curt Schilling on his favorite memories in the video game "EverQuest"
by travdog6 on
Dec 18, 2008 1:34 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
that's funny :-)
We don’t need another Estaban Loiza.
You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}
by micdog2001 on
Dec 18, 2008 3:47 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
one thing the a's might consider changing
is the visiting players entrance. to get to the entrance, the players must go under and overpass that is home to around 30 people. not all that dangerous. but its not gonna make anyone really want to come here
"My group runs some frogloks down the hall to finish them off and POP! RASTER! If there was a way to scream louder than caps in EQ I was doing it. Man I am straight panicking because I know I have NO CHANCE soloing and the party has run off. I'm in my hotel room; it's like 5am, and I am straight hollering, in EQ and in real life. Bottom line is the group comes back, heals me, and kills Raster! WOOT!" -Curt Schilling on his favorite memories in the video game "EverQuest"
by travdog6 on
Dec 18, 2008 1:43 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Nah
It’s not an Oakland thing. I’ve only been there once, but it was totally fine. I would guess that players don’t like knowing that there is always the chance that they could be traded at a moment’s notice, which has happened more than a few times to players in this organization. Small crowds has been mentioned as well by several people, and that probably factors in to it, too. One thing I haven’t really seen mentioned is I wonder if Beane’s inexperience in dealing with long-term deal-seeking free agents played a part. I mean, when was the last time the A’s went out and signed a FA to a 4-year deal? My thoughts are that maybe Beane didn’t realize that Oakland wasn’t a real option because he’s not used to being in this kind of situation.
Might as well Jump! - Van Halen
by sprtsnwyn on
Dec 18, 2008 3:11 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
+1000
this is why I hate proposals that say “sign X now, trade at midseason”
by ohmangoAs on
Dec 18, 2008 9:53 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah
I mean, usually moves like that work out for both teams, but to expect someone to come here that wasn’t drafted by the team and know that they could be next at any given time is probably not that appealing.
Might as well Jump! - Van Halen
by sprtsnwyn on
Dec 19, 2008 4:31 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My 2 cents
Last season I sat on the first base side, middle deck (Plaza Level?), closer to the foul pole, a few times and at least one fight broke out at each game.
I remember once someone throwing something down from the third deck (wait, that portion of the third deck was closed last year? Hhmm maybe I was on the 1st level or it was a few years ago when the 3rd deck was open) . . . anyways . . . this guy in the section next to me got really mad and threw a cup of beer up to the 3rd deck. It was dumb b/c the beer came showering down on him and the rest of the crowd in his section.
Wasn’t there also an incident where fans were throwing batteries at Carl Everett?
I also took the tour of the A’s clubhouse at Fanfest (R.I.P.) last year and everything except the locker room looked like a high school gym.
Besides being to the Coliseum more than 50 times, I have only been to Candlestick in the 90’s and SBC park (or whatever it’s called) once last year for a work gathering. So i can’t compare it to other stadiums. I will concede that SBC is a way nicer park than Oakland, but it’s new so the shine hasn’t worn off quite yet, and a nice park doesn’t mean much if you don’t like the team.
I usually feel safe at the Coliseum, even walking from the "free parking lots" across the freeway, but I can see where some people think the crowd is unruly. I like the A’s a lot and I get defensive when people trash talk them but I can also see where players might want to play in a better park with larger crowds.
You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}
by micdog2001 on
Dec 18, 2008 3:39 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
It was a cell phone thrown at Carl Everett.
Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!
by Monday Fan on
Dec 18, 2008 4:36 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I've been to the Coliseum for games hundreds of times ...
and have usually sat in the Plaza Level (aka the middle deck) and haven’t seen fights break out more than a dozen times or so … I’ve never been to a Red Sox or Yankees game and not seen a fight break out, fwiw …
The facilities are lacking, though. I agree with that.
"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback
by devo on
Dec 19, 2008 1:30 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I've been to Yankee games and not seen fights break out....sitting in the bleachers no less.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 19, 2008 1:59 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
fwiw
the bleachers at yankee stadium are booze-free, probably because there used to be many fights.
by MaineAthletic on
Dec 19, 2008 9:10 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I've only been to 1 Yankee game ...
SSS and all …
"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback
by devo on
Dec 19, 2008 12:02 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The bleachers at Yankee Stadium are dry, but a lot of booze gets smuggled in...
…and people show up pretty sloppy to begin with.
I went in on season tickets for the Yankees and the Mets when I lived in NYC (I’m an A’s fan but what can I say, I just love watching baseball). I saw a fight break out at Yankee stadium 8 out of 10 games. There were less at Shea, but there are also a lot less people at Shea. It was pretty common at both places to have people throw beer at opposing teams’ fans, talking serious mess (i.e. homophobic stuff and comments about peoples’ looks vs just bagging on someone’s team), and just generally being obnoxious.
The Coliseum might have the occasional flare-up, but it’s not as consistently bad as other ballparks I’ve been to.
by SanJoseA's on
Dec 19, 2008 12:48 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Like ATL and LA are that much better…
The opinions expressed in a FanPost are not necessarily those of the California Golden Blogs or any of its authors. However, they are just as important as the opinions of any of the authors. And doubly so as compared to TwistNHook!
by carp on
Dec 18, 2008 4:25 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
dude has two homes and the real estate market sucks…can’t really blame him for not wanting to be upside down or renting when he could live in his own house.
The opinions expressed in a FanPost are not necessarily those of the California Golden Blogs or any of its authors. However, they are just as important as the opinions of any of the authors. And doubly so as compared to TwistNHook!
by carp on
Dec 18, 2008 4:25 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Every person is different but...
If you gave me $10M a year for 4 years I would live in ANTARCTICA
by halflink123 on
Dec 18, 2008 4:43 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
10M or no....
you would be eating a lot of penguin.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on
Dec 18, 2008 5:26 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Mmmm.....penguin
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 5:53 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
With $40m I imagine you could fly in some caviar.
by OldhamA on
Dec 18, 2008 6:25 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't imagine penguin would be any worse than chicken, but I never tried it.
by halflink123 on
Dec 18, 2008 7:28 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
actually it might not taste that good...imported caviar it is
The Scottish National Antarctic Expedition of 1902-04 enjoyed a Christmas dinner of Penguin a la Scotia, named for the expedition’s ship. … Seal, penguin and whale meat were often consumed on the first Byrd Antarctic expedition (1928-30), says Colonel Norman D Vaughan, the expedition’s last-surviving member: ‘They all taste quite alike. It is all heavy, black meat, but as long as it’s fresh, it’s great.’ Dr. Phillip G Law, leader of the Australian National Antarctic Research Expedition from 1949 to 1966 says: ‘I have tasted a variety of meats from Antarctic species – seals, penguins, skuas. There is one basic rule of greatest importance when preparing them: get rid of every last remnant of blubber, otherwise the food will have an abominable fishy taste.’ … ‘Because of the power pectoral muscles developed for swimming, the meatiest part of the penguin is its breast,’ says Law. ’ The dense muscle meat resembles ox heart. My favourite recipe is to thinly slice the breast and fry it with a coating of egg and bread crumbs in the fashion of a wiener schnitzel.’ …
Frederick A. Cook, surgeon on the Belgica expedition … :‘It is rather difficult to describe its taste and appearance; we have absolutely no meat with which to compare it. The penguin, as an animal, seems to be made up o fan equal proportion of a mammal, fish, and fowl. If it is possible to imagine a piece of beef, an odriferous codfish, and a canvas-back duck, roasted in a pot, with blood and cod-liver oil for sauce, the illustration will be complete.’
Penguin eggs were also an important part of many Antarctic diets, especially since they keep for up to a year in the natural refrigeration. They are different from hen’s eggs, to be sure: the ‘white’ never sets, even when well-cooked, and the yolk in some species is a bright orange or red."
by halflink123 on
Dec 18, 2008 7:33 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Slight OT
But Rosenthal seems to think that Abreu will land in Oakland. I can’t see how he has a job, Rosenthal that is, because where exactly does Abreu fit? It’s not like Giambi where you could “hide” him at 1B, Abreu is either a DH or an OFer. From all acounts his days of playing in the OF should be numbered and we have Cust at DH who shouldn’t sniff the OF either. I just dont know some times…
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on
Dec 18, 2008 6:02 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe it's the free agents who are too ghetto for Oakland.
Yeah. Think on that for a while.
by whiteshoes40 on
Dec 18, 2008 6:07 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Including the future FAs on the team now?
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 6:16 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Why are we talking as if there have been a bunch of times
free agents have “spurned us” when the A’s offered the most money? Other than Furcal, I’m having a hard time thinking about the last time that happened — if ever. (And like one person wrote above, it didn’t really happen this time, either.)
Plain and simple, we never offer the most money. So all of this talk about the city and the Coliseum being the reason players don’t come here is wrong, IMO. Players don’t often come here because they get bigger offers to play elsewhere. Period.
It’s been mentioned already, but trust me — St. Louis, New York, Chicago, Philly, Baltimore, Detroit, and on and on and on — each of these cities have major crime issues and inner-city neighborhoods that make Oakland look like church.
The vast majority of free agents play where they’re paid the most. They don’t give a rip about the stadium or the neighborhood it’s in. They drive for miles to get from the suburbs to the yard, anyway.
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
by Vacafan on
Dec 18, 2008 7:19 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I can totally understand the "lack of attendance/electricity" concern,
but on the other issue my main comment is that if any player feels physically unsafe at the Oakland Coliseum, I don’t think I really want him trying to help my team compete.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on
Dec 18, 2008 7:32 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
You guys know there's only one way to prove this theory, right?
Here it is:
Move A’s stadium to Richmond. or the Tenderloin. hell, how bout Golden Gate Park, night games would be a blast!
Then and only then will we be able to truly call our stadium too ghetto for the players…
by stranahanahan on
Dec 18, 2008 9:36 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I will DEFINITELY be among the first 10,000 in line
for “Crack Day” at Tenderloin Stadium!
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on
Dec 18, 2008 10:09 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Meh
Well, I guess there is a point. Having grown up on the East Coast and attended baseball games in Cleveland, Washington DC, Cincy, Chicago, Pittsburgh, and Oakland (on vacation), there’s a noticeable lack of “electricity” at Oakland Coliseum . . . maybe because of the older ballpark (when compared to Great American or PNC) or maybe just because of a lack of general enthusiasm about the team around town. Of course, I’m basing this judgement off having only been in town a few days, but it was soo disheartening visiting my lifelong favorite club and experiencing the sort of “ho hum” ambivalent attitude I encountered in Cali. I think it’s largely due to the old confines of the Coliseum, honestly, when compared to all the anemities the newer park offers to the casual fan. Hell, I dunno maybe I was just seated in the wrong sections. Anyways, I think the new stadium will be a definate upgrade for the team and will aid in attracting more attention from casual fans/free agents/etc. Until then, I’ll be saving my money for another venture out to Oakland next summer.
"It's never 'just a game' if you're winning" - George Carlin
by bluelightrain84 on
Dec 18, 2008 9:36 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
The crowd I encountered at the Coliseum in 2008 was a lot more similar to what I'd expect at a high
school game than a major league game. Only the prices were major league there. Nothing at all like St Louis or New York or Seattle or Chicago or Atlanta
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 9:47 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Or LA or Anaheim or San Francisco
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 18, 2008 9:51 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
then your experience in anaheim is much different than mine.
I have been to every game save 1 or 2 that the A’s have played at Anaheim in the past year and a half, and I can say they are really the worst fans.
Anyone else notice that they don’t cheer unless the jumbotron tells them to, or when the rally monkey is on the screen?
And honestly, they leave after the 5th inning if the Angels aren’t ahead. And to top it off, half of them are just getting drunk and causing shit anyway, I’ve seen at least 1 arrest at every game i’ve been to, and it was an angels fan. Need I mention the Street or Piazza incidents?
by stranahanahan on
Dec 19, 2008 1:02 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well I haven't been there in about 25 years.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 19, 2008 1:58 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Seriously?!
Seattle?! I go to about 5 games a summer up at Safeco … if you think the “energy” in Seattle is greater than Oakland, then I must be missing something … and I know you’re not serious when you mention LA, Anaheim, and San Francisco … San Francisco, especially. But then you admit that you haven’t been to Anaheim in 25 years, so I see how you missed that one.
I suppose if you happened to get to Seattle during one of their play-off runs, then perhaps you sensed more electricity …
There’s no question that East Coast stadiums and some in the Midwest, like St. Louis and Wrigley, have a more energized crowd. No doubt. But to single out Oakland out here in the West — well, I don’t think it’s fair. You could switch the crowds in Seattle, Oakland, SF, Anaheim, LA, and San Diego and you wouldn’t notice the difference (at least as far as “energy” is concerned.)
And Atlanta?? When was the last time you visited Atlanta? I’ve been to the old park about 7 times, and the new one twice. Except for playoff games, they’re as quiet as a mouse. Can’t sell me on that one, either.
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
by Vacafan on
Dec 19, 2008 9:09 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I went to Atlanta about five years ago. The crowds at Seattle aren't energetic but it's not
the high school sized crowd I saw at the Coliseum. I’m perfectly serious about all of the above places. They had crowds that one could imagine at a major league game. The Oakland crowd was the size of a high school or small college baseball game and about as energetic as the ones at the other west coast venues.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 19, 2008 6:24 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It all depends...
Oakland fans are used to winning (‘70s, late ’80s early ’90s, 2001-2006), so when the team gets in a bit of a lull, the excitement dwindles because people in the East Bay have so many options competing for their time and money. Go to playoff games, big rivalries, etc. when the team is “in it” and you will see a complete turnaround in terms of atmosphere. The A’s, in some regards, get a better atmosphere because the Coliseum is old. People come there to watch baseball, plain and simple, not to eat sushi, look at boats, use the internet, etc. I could care less about the casual fan (except their money, and the chance that they or their kids will become die-hards), but Oakland can and will be again a great place to watch a game.
by MaineAthletic on
Dec 19, 2008 9:18 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Raiders
I think the Raiders bad reputation rubs off on the A’s. Leapord bloom said on AN a while ago “Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail.” Whether or not that is true many people believe the sentiment. The Raiders are one of the most popular sports brands bar none and the reputation of Raiders fans as being violent is carried far and wide often by people who only associated with the Raiders because of that reputation. These ambassadors of a city that is also known for its murder rate don’t help much in improving Oakland’s reputation.
Combine that with the fact that the Raiders ruined the Coliseum by forcing the building of that monstrosity Mt. Davis. Furthermore, they make the field terrible to play on for the last month and a half of the season. If youre talking about working conditions playing on a post football game field might count.
I love going to see games in Oakland. They’re cheap, the fans are knowledgeable, you can walk up and get tickets, I can bring my mom to games in the bleacher seats for her birthday and there aren’t the drunk assholes that you find in other places (Boston or where ever there bandwagon fans are that week for example), and for being smaller crowds they make some good noise, not like seattle (man the game i saw at safeco was quiet like a funeral).
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on
Dec 19, 2008 11:33 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
It's a perception that needs to be countered
A lot of people are missing the forest and staring at the tree.
Whether Oakland and the Coliseum is safe is not the main point. It comes down to money and perception. See: Detroit.
Sure there are fights at the Coliseum, but there are fights at nearly every stadium. The problem is a few over the top incidents that get highlighted and reinforced. Was watching a game on TV some years ago when something flew in one of the dug outs (can’t remember which one, memory is fuzzy). Immediately the announcers started going off about how unsafe Oakland is and how the fans are terrible, etc, etc. Turns out the object was a piece of a batting donut that flew off while somebody was in the on deck circle. Oakland fans absolved, right? nope! The announcers kept going on about the unruly fans etc etc.
Obviously there’s some association going on with the city and Raiders that rubs off on the A’s. The problem is this is never countered! It would be nice to see an ad campaign with players interacting with fans to show they aren’t all wild hooligans.
by Jernskogen on
Dec 20, 2008 12:24 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Doesn't this only work if the fans aren't all wild hooligans?
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on
Dec 20, 2008 9:26 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
















