Athletics Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: A statistical basis for widespread HATE

Projecting the Enemy: Mariners

It must be a tough time to be a sports fan in the state of Washington. The Mariners just lost 100 games with their $100 million payroll. The Seahawks are, as of me writing this paragraph, 2-5, which while not technically out of contention in the fetid cesspool that is the NFC West, is pretty gosh-darned close. The basketball team just up and left for Oklahoma City, of all places, after trying and failing to extort a huge cash giveaway from the citizens. As in most extortion situations, the failure to reach a bargain has probably left both sides worse off... but somehow my sympathies lie more with the good people of Seattle than with Clay "Bad Faith Effort" Bennett.

And the college football. Holy Christ, those are some bad teams. Washington State might be the worst BCS conference team I've ever seen. Counting their win over Division 1-AA Portland State, they've been outscored 443-111 on the season. That 443 was accomplished in 9 games, which means their defense is giving up a cool 49 points a game. I tried to calculate their Pythagorean record, and my calculator, I kid you not, spat out one of those numbers with an "e^-2" at the end of it. 

As for Washington, well, Washington State is the team of the two with an actual win this season. The Huskies also have a lame duck coach (ironically, Oregon, which ought in some sense to have a "lame Duck" coach quite often, has the longest tenured coach in the Pac-10).

So, while things are pretty bad-- as bad as I can ever remember, really-- right now around here when it comes to sporting success, thank your deity of choice that you are not in Seattle.

Star-divide

I apologize for the rambling intro-- suffice it to say that I come to bury the Mariners, not to praise them.

C: Kenji Johjima (0 runs offensively, 0 runs defensively)

Mariners fans can thank the chauvinism of the team's Japanese ownership for the fact that Johjima is now under contract for THREE more seasons, at a price of about $8 million per. He's 32, so he's not getting any better. The pitchers hate him. The rest of the team basically hates him. The only good news is that he figures to regress to the mean offensively. In prior years he was actually a pretty good catcher, and I'm giving him something of a pass on this horrible year, but my intuition tells me he'll be worse than I'm projecting him at.

1B: Bryan LaHair (-20 runs offensively, -5 runs defensively)

Took me a while kicking around the roster to even find this guy. It seems safe to write in replacement level performance at 1B for the Mariners. It never ceases to amaze me how any team cannot manage to find at least acceptable offense (or at least the promise thereof, eg Daric Barton) at first base. And yet the Giants and Mariners seem to make quite the habit of it.

2B: Jose Lopez (-10 runs offensively, 0 runs defensively)

I was under the impression that Lopez's defense was criticized often, but apparently it's not half bad. The offense, though? Bad. I know he had a good year this year, but it's mostly due to a spike in batting average and he has a ton of mediocrity to regress to.

SS: Yuniesky Betancourt (-5 runs offensively, -10 runs defensively)

If Betancourt could actually field his position, he'd be a perfectly acceptable shortstop. And, in fact, that's what the Mariners thought they were getting when they signed the guy. Apparently, however, he has become a fat slob with extremely limited range-- kind of a younger (hence less excusable) version of Juan Uribe. This middle infield is a suckfest and it's signed through 2010. Incidentally, in their combined careers spanning approximately 7 full seasons, Lopez and Betancourt have 147 walks. That has a lot to do with those negative numbers in the offense column...

3B: Adrian Beltre (+5 runs offensively, +15 runs defensively)

Finally some pluses. Adrian Beltre is a defensive stud who is tasked with making up for Betancourt's feeble range in the hole and somehow manages to accomplish that, while still doing a pretty decent job on balls hit to the "normal" third base zone. He's also surprisingly young considering how many years he's been in MLB. Next year will only be his age 30 season. If this sounds like a sales pitch, well, it is one.

RF: Ichiro (+15 runs offensively, +5 runs defensively)

Did I just rate Ichiro the same as Adrian Beltre? Hm. Yes, I believe I did. Well, Mr. Overrated, you deserve it... you could easily be 10 runs better than this if you played the correct position and got the memo that fouling off ball fours in an attempt to get more base hits is not the correct strategy.

CF: Jeremy Reed (-15 runs offensively, 0 runs defensively)

I like the concept of Jeremy Reed, but the execution blows. He's sort of the Mulholland Drive of outfielders.

LF: Wladimir Balentien (-10 runs offensively, -5 runs defensively)

I did not see this season coming, I have to say. Balentien put up great minor league numbers at every step-- good power, decent plate discipline, not a great glove but tolerable. This year he was quite possibly the worst player in MLB. He continued to mash in AAA and he's just 23, so I'm not bailing on the guy yet, but he's clearly a work in progress on both sides of the ball. I'd actually love to see the A's buy low on him as part of a Beltre deal.

DH: Jeff Clement (-10 runs offensively)

Seattle has handled Clement very poorly, I think, but the guy has a pretty solid bat if they give it time to come around. His upside is far higher at catcher (think about it-- the difference between a DH and a C is about 25 runs!), but "Nintendo Power" Johjima is blocking him.

Pitching

SP: Felix Hernandez (+20 runs)

Hernandez hasn't quite lived up to the hype, but that doesn't mean he isn't a good player. He's still crazily young-- next year will be his age 23 season; he's on pace to become a free agent at 26. Could he be the first pitcher to break the $200 million mark? I wouldn't bet against it.

SP: Erik Bedard (0 runs)

Bedard, himself, is a great deal better than this. But he's almost assuredly going to miss time next year and he's pretty likely to miss a LOT of time, and the fill-ins (hello, R.A. Dickey...) are not very good. And there's some chance he will return with diminished stuff or suffer a relapse.

SP: Brandon Morrow (+5 runs) 

I'm pretty high on the ex-Golden Bear, and once again I have severe criticisms of how he's been handled by Seattle. The decision to put him in the bullpen last year essentially crossed a year of development time off for virtually no return. Seattle, as we shall see, does not lack for solid bullpen arms.

SP: Jarrod Washburn (-5 runs)

Washburn was his standard somewhat lame self this year. No particular reason to expect any change in status. Still difficult to believe how much money he got based on one fluky-good season in 2005.

SP: Carlos Silva (-15 runs)

Silva, likewise, had a few good years in the middle part of the decade, but 2 of his last 3 seasons have been putrid, festering eyesores. Last year he was probably the worst starting pitcher in baseball. I don't see him as that bad going forward, but I'm sure as hell not optimistic either.

Bullpen: -5 runs

Last year the unit was right around league average, and I figure more Putz will largely cancel out less Morrow. I don't see a ton of reinforcements waiting in the wings, but Roy Corcoran, Sean Green, Putz and Ryan Rowland-Smith are pretty solid. Cesar Jimenez looks promising. The reanimated corpse of Miguel Batista is probably somewhere in here as well, but I'm not sure I'd characterize that as a plus.

Overall: -50 runs, 76-86

This is weird. The Mariners don't actually look that bad. Let me see if I can suss this out. They lose Ibanez, but that was less of a loss than it appears (him to Balentien is about 2 wins-- Ibanez should not ever play the field again in his life). On the other hand, I'm not forcing them to play Jose Vidro at DH, Richie Sexson at first, or Miguel Batista in the rotation... or, God help us, Miguel Cairo anywhere. Throw in some healthy regression from guys like Silva and Johjima and... eh, there's still some gap between my perceptions and what this projection is telling me. I chalk it up to the "Bill Bavasi is just that stupid" factor.

Still, I think it's a tear-down. The two best players are also two of the highest paid. Beltre's contract is about to expire, and he's edging toward the point where players tend to decline a bit; meanwhile Ichiro's new deal should take him well into his years of decrepitude. They need to move Beltre and Washburn for what they can get, pray Bedard gets healthy and do the same for him. Lopez should definitely have a ticket out of town this offseason. Score a few prospects, claim a few guys off the waiver wire, and stink it up until the farm system spits out a few more quality players.

5 recs  |  Comment 129 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Also, just a couple of reminders:

1. I’m comparing offense to positional offensive values. So, catchers and shortstops get a run boost, first basemen and DHs get runs knocked off their production total.

2. I’m assuming no transactions other than options getting picked up, arbitration being offered, and players going back and forth to the minor leagues. Why? So I can “plug in” any new transactions to create a running “situation report”. Also because I’m lazy and not Buster Olney.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 2, 2008 6:51 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

If it wasn't for 1b, 2b, and SS, they might actually be an average team...shocking

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 2, 2008 7:49 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

OT

But if it’s a cesspool you want, try the AFC West, where those wacky and wonderful Raiders are a mere two games off the pace at 2-6, even after today’s disappearing act.

Hey thanks for leaving so soon, baseball. At least I had you to look forward to after Sunday’s like today, which is pretty much every Sunday.

I'm here to talk about the past.

by 67MARQUEZ on Nov 2, 2008 8:22 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I actually had the game on today

wow…pretty depressing for a Raider fan

by OaklandSi on Nov 2, 2008 9:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

As I posted earlier on SaBP

Only 155 days until opening day!

"However, at Elias, I think they keep track of the amount of sunflower seeds spit in a dugout each night." - Brad Ziegler, 8/7/08

by doctorK on Nov 2, 2008 10:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Is that blog name even still accurate?

Wouldn’t “Silver and Black Shame” be more appropriate? Or perhaps “Silver and Black Embarrassment”?

Niners Nation may be a failed state, but it is still a nation…

I suppose it could be worse— think of CougCenter. Not only are they supporting a team with a Pythagorean winning percentage of (I kid you not) 0.4% in Pac-10 play, they constantly have to suffer tasteless, repetitive jokes about lascivious older women from jerks like me.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 2, 2008 10:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I was at the game on Sunday

I have been a season ticket holder for both the A’s & Raider’s since 92 & this is the first time I ever contemplated walking out. I only have one thing to say after Sunday…Go Sharks!!!

by adragon on Nov 3, 2008 10:30 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Can you imagine the difference

there would be if Felix would have been come up with say… the Red Sox. Some team with an above average defense and you know… an offense.

I think his numbers would just plain scary already as a 23 year old.

Wouldn’t it be a beautiful thing if Inoa would live up to it all and the A’s didn’t suck like the M’s? Don’t mind me I’m just over here knocking on wood

by NateHST on Nov 2, 2008 9:25 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

PT you could've saved a lot of time with this post, my version would be

Projecting the Enemy: Mariners

lol mariners

(apologies to LL and USSM)

Can't get enough of the Oakland A's or Golden State Warriors? Visit Oaktown Awesomer's and Golden Stat Hoops

by iamawesomer on Nov 2, 2008 10:47 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Edit
I’d actually love to see the A’s buy low on him as part of a Beltre deal.

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Nov 3, 2008 3:13 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Rowland-Smith

Do you really think he’ll be in the bullpen? All the talk up here is about keeping him in the rotation. Makes sense to me. He’d certainly be an improvement on Silva.

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Nov 3, 2008 3:18 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

As of right now, yes

That being said, a. he’s probably the frontrunner for the spot that will be open until Bedard returns, if indeed he DOES return (he could be non-tendered), and b. by the time the rotation above is complete, it’s entirely possible that one of them (most likely Silva or Morrow) will be sucking intensely enough to get bounced from the rotation instead of Rowland-Smith.

WIth that said, I also have to say that I do not really understand the hype about him in places like LL. He might be average, but I doubt he’s much better than that.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 3, 2008 9:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

By the way, the hype is that he is average and cheap.

He’s a #4 starter that is perfectly capable of handling that spot. He will probably never even reach a league-average “#3” type role. But he will put up about the same production that Washburn will, at a much lower price. He has higher upside, too (very, very slightly).
It’s not so much that we LONG for RRS to be in the rotation (although we do have a particular fondness about him, he is a personable guy with his own blog where he responds to fans). It’s that dumping Washburn’s salary and moving RRS into the rotation shows that the Mariners organization isn’t completely stupid. That, in and of itself, is enough to be excited about.

by lailaihei on Nov 3, 2008 11:22 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

My presumption of Rowland-Smith in the rotation

is based entirely on hearing it discussed regularly in the local TV and newspaper coverage. That is probably also the origin of the hype about him in place like LL.

You might argue that the local coverage is just stupid. That may well be, but I would suggest to you, in all seriousness, that the Mariners organization is very methodical about promoting players to the fan base, and the generic local media would not be talking about Rowland-Smith as starter if the front office weren’t actively marketing his brand.

If you know anything about how the Mariners are run, you will understand that the organization’s investment in marketing a player to the fans is a stronger indicator of his future playing time than how good he is.

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Nov 3, 2008 12:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

thats amusing

speaking of which, i wouldnt mind getting some knowledgeable LL people over here to comment in this thread. curious to hear what they have to say.

Save Rajai Davis

by oakinboston on Nov 3, 2008 12:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

hyphenated men bias

I wouldn’t project much from Rowland-Smith.

"Some of the men didn't wait for the women and children to jump off the sinking ship that is our season." - 67MARQUEZ

by notsellingjeans on Nov 5, 2008 2:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I thought men didn't have hyphens

Did you overpay for those eggs? @('.')@

by monkeyball on Nov 5, 2008 3:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No that's labrums

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 5, 2008 5:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

good thing, it hurts when you tear them, apparently

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 5, 2008 8:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

iglew wishes you'd said "labra"

Did you overpay for those eggs? @('.')@

by monkeyball on Nov 5, 2008 9:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

mulholland drive is awesome. sticking with david lynch, jeremy reed is more the inland empire of outfielders.

A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05

by xbhaskarx on Nov 3, 2008 8:40 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I was about to post the very same thing

Oh, if people only knew how frugal we are. @('.')@

by monkeyball on Nov 3, 2008 9:36 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

There is something cognitively dissonant

about the title of this post and i think it’s the idea of los marineros as the “enemy.” Don’t they seem better suited for the sidekick or second banana role?

"...in baseball you wear a cap." -- george carlin

by Hot Cup Joe on Nov 3, 2008 10:39 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Mariners: The Penguin of baseball teams?

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 3, 2008 11:09 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, if people only knew how frugal we are. @('.')@

by monkeyball on Nov 3, 2008 11:56 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Cey it ain't so.

I'm here to talk about the past.

by 67MARQUEZ on Nov 3, 2008 1:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Good God - Now i understand everything...

It’s Entourage, AL West style :

Mariners = Turtle, the ineffectual sidekick
Rangers = Drama, the moron sidekick
A’s = E, the smart & decent sidekick
Angels = Vince, the deeply flawed superstar

"...in baseball you wear a cap." -- george carlin

by Hot Cup Joe on Nov 3, 2008 4:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Am I the only one who finds that show completely insufferable

But I did only watch the first season, which was something like 6 episodes.

by thejd44 on Nov 3, 2008 9:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Okay, we'll change the show, then

A’s = Donatello
Rangers = Raphael
Angels = Michaelangelo
Mariners = Leonardo

Everybody loves Michaelangelo, but Donatello’s staff can hit Rocksteady in the head from safe ground.

au contra ire

by JediLeroy on Nov 3, 2008 9:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No way

Raph was a bad ass

by thejd44 on Nov 4, 2008 12:35 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ya gotta know what a crumpet is to play cricket

Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.

by Joey C. on Nov 4, 2008 3:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Raphael is the only one of the four

who prefers women to boys. Artistically, I mean.

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Nov 3, 2008 10:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Porn & baseball on one site

Perfection.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Nov 5, 2008 9:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 4, 2008 7:31 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

How about this.

Mariners: Aquaman
Rangers: The Hulk
Athletics: Batman
Angels: The Flash

facepalm.jpg

by Zonis on Nov 4, 2008 12:10 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I like that better

Only because Aquaman is useless. I didn’t realize the Flash was so grindy.

by thejd44 on Nov 4, 2008 12:36 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Aquaman = Useless
The Hulk = Power, nothing else
Batman = Has to think everything though
The Flash = Speed, nothing else

facepalm.jpg

by Zonis on Nov 5, 2008 6:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

who's captain planet?

"It's like déjà vu all over again." -yogi berra

by Cheezombie on Nov 5, 2008 9:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

if by 'lame' you mean 'greatest of all time' then yes, he is really quite lame

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 5, 2008 10:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No, he really was lame

He is the only “superhero” I can think of who can only be hurt by the very thing he was designed to fight.

“Aw, crap! Sludgeman is spreading toxic waste everywhere! Gooooo, Planet!”

“Aw, crap! Captain Planet is covered with toxic waste and is now completely worthless! I guess it’s up to me and my pet monkey to bail his ass out— again.”

Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.

by Joey C. on Nov 6, 2008 2:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

thats why you gotta go out and plant trees

the show was designed so that kids could fight sludgemonsters, lol. but seriously, I only watched the show because I loved wheeler, the Fire guy. I was never a fan of the heart guy though, how do you fight crime with that? Wouldn’t it be cool though if the A’s could all have rings, and chavvy can be captain planet since he’s supposed to be good at baseball, but ironically that’s the very thing (injuries from baseball) that stops him from playing. Of course, in this scenario Crosby is the evil villain in disguise who is secretly implementing his meticulously detailed plan on how to bring down his ‘team’.

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 6, 2008 9:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The Rays

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 5, 2008 9:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The Rays have nasty green mullets?

Or Captain Planet squandered the world series?

au contra ire

by JediLeroy on Nov 5, 2008 9:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

DC bias

Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.

by Joey C. on Nov 4, 2008 3:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

???

What show is that?

Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!

by Monday Fan on Nov 4, 2008 2:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Raph's weapon was the strongest

Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.

by Joey C. on Nov 4, 2008 3:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Leonardo was far and away the most versatile, valuable ninja turtle

at least in the Nintendo video game version.

His Katana blades afforded him the ability to strike with both power and speed. The other NT’s either suffered from lack of quickness (Donatello) or power (Raphy and Mike).

But that’s just like, my opinion, man.

"Some of the men didn't wait for the women and children to jump off the sinking ship that is our season." - 67MARQUEZ

by notsellingjeans on Nov 5, 2008 3:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So Leonardo = Ellis

Donatello, Mikey, and Raph = The rest of the team?

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 5, 2008 8:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, don't get me wrong, Leo was great.

Mike really sucked, to be honest. Donatello had so much range, though.

It doesn’t really matter anyway, because no matter how strong or quick you are, you won’t make it through the radioactive seaweed.

au contra ire

by JediLeroy on Nov 5, 2008 10:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That took me so long to beat

Then I found out the next level sucked just as hard. Video games used to be tough, man.

Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.

by Joey C. on Nov 6, 2008 3:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ever beat Batman on NES?

Without Game Genie? I don’t think so.

au contra ire

by JediLeroy on Nov 6, 2008 4:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I've been wondering something for a while now

Were video games harder back in the NES days, or were we just not as good at video games (age and/or experience)? I wish I could find a working NES and some of those games (the Ghostbusters game was a bitch) to see if I fare any better these days.

by thejd44 on Nov 7, 2008 9:33 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Trust me, they were so hard it makes you wonder if they were a social experiment

I still have my old Nintendo, and those games kick my ass. Ghostbusters is a perfect example— I didn’t beat that until I was in, like, high school.

Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.

by Joey C. on Nov 7, 2008 11:24 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Bah, you young whippersnappers had it easy!

Not only did I have to walk uphill to and from school in driving sleet wearing rusty rollerskates, but Pong kicked my ass every day and twice on Sundays.

Did you overpay for those eggs? @('.')@

by monkeyball on Nov 7, 2008 11:47 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The inability to save games midway through made most of them borderline impossible

I remember playing the original BattleToads, and I couldn’t get past level 3 (of 12).

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 7, 2008 3:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

that game was ridiculously hard, but ridiculously addicting

i think i must have forced my friends to let me borrow that on many different occasions

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 7, 2008 8:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I remember having bad dreams...

about my inability to beat a few levels of NES video games. Yeah, I played too much.

But I agree that games are much easier now. Part of that is the prevalence of cheat codes these days and that the kids all can find help online.

No wonder their generation is so lazy. Even their procrastination is anti-competitive.

"Some of the men didn't wait for the women and children to jump off the sinking ship that is our season." - 67MARQUEZ

by notsellingjeans on Nov 8, 2008 9:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think you gave up too soon

It’s not a great show by any means but it got better than it was in those first six episodes. Ari is the star of the show, not Vince and his hangers-on (though Johnny Drama can be amusing at times).

Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!

by Monday Fan on Nov 4, 2008 2:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

E was the only character I liked at all

Six episodes is a lot to give a show a chance. It only took 2-3 episodes of the Shield to get into it. Same with The Wire.

I believe that it’s better now, but there are just too many awesome shows out there (and old ones I missed) that I don’t know if I’ll ever get back to giving it a second chance.

by thejd44 on Nov 5, 2008 9:36 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yo no soy marinero, soy capitán.

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Nov 3, 2008 12:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If they're really a 76 win team and the Angels are really a 84 win team, and there's

not really anything in the pipeline at the higher levels, why not buy some free agents and try to contend while they still have Beltre? Ichiro isn’t getting any younger either. They lose about $25M from Sexson, Vidro, Ibanez and Wilkerson. I’m too lazy to calculate raises but say they add up to $15M. They’d add about five wins by adding Manny vs Balentien and another three with Giambi instead of LaHair. Maybe Reed learns to hit. Maybe Bedard dominates in the second half. Its So for a mere $20M payroll increase they become a legit competitor. Add another $5M if they feel like bringing back Griffey.

Of course I don’t think they’re really a 76 win team….more like 70-72. And I don’t think the Angels are really an 84 win team…more like 90.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 3, 2008 7:00 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Why not sign Teixeira,

thereby subtracting him from LAA, adding him to SEA, and addressing a position that is basically unfilled? Wouldn’t that make up the 8-win difference right there. What, does Teixeira want to get paid?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Nov 3, 2008 7:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I want to start off by saying that I, in no way, think that Texeira and Sexson are equal players

or any permutation thereof. However, would you think that maybe the M’s will be a little wary of signing another big contract 1b? In my mind, maybe, maybe not, but due to their recent failed signings (Vidro, Jojima, though I think he’s still ok, Sexson, Silva…) they have to be at least slightly hesitant to give that much money and that many years to any one player. I think that if they wanted to sign Tex, that hesitation will cost them.

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 3, 2008 7:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If there's a true bidding war for Teixeira,

the numbers could get truly ridiculous.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Nov 3, 2008 7:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

By the way I didn't mention Teixeira because I didn't think they could get him.

He probably wants to go to a contender on an 8 year no trade deal. Manny is likely to go to the highest bidder with or without a no-trade. Same with Giambi.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 3, 2008 8:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You can't run a business from a position of fear.

If you really believe Teixeira is the difference between third place and first place then you can spend a whole lotta cash to sign him. 8 years $200M would be worth it, and maybe even tradeable after the 2010 collapse.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 3, 2008 8:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

but I don't think the Mariners will view him as the difference maker.

Is he a great player? Yes. Do many people think he will get them back into playoff contention? Probably not after this last season. Plus, I don’t see why Tex would want to even go there, unless all the teams collude and the Mariners don’t get the memo.

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 3, 2008 8:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Right, I don't think he'll go there either. I also don't think the reasoning that Sexson

sucked so we’ll never sign another high priced FA is solid.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 3, 2008 8:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree, but I didn't mean that the M's won't ever sign another high priced FA

I just meant that in a bidding war for Tex, any hesitation because of recent failures may cause an issue. To be honest, I really have no clue what the M’s are thinking right now, or what their direction is.

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 3, 2008 8:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure what they're thinking either since Jack Z is a new GM

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 3, 2008 9:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's not "never sign another high priced FA."

It’s “don’t sign 1B/DH types to long-term, big money deals because they’re almost always a bad idea.”

J.K.L.

by acblue on Nov 3, 2008 10:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

tell that to Microsoft

Oh, if people only knew how frugal we are. @('.')@

by monkeyball on Nov 3, 2008 9:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Hello, is Steve around?

Hi Steve, about that fear based business thing….

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 3, 2008 9:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This year's Mariners were not a 76 win team

However, this year’s Mariners played Miguel Cairo, Richie Sexson, Miguel Batista and Jose Vidro for prolonged periods of time.

It is literally the case that a bunch of players leaving in free agency (or through outright release) will probably improve the Mariners’ team.

As for the Angels, I still haven’t heard a single cogent argument for more than a win or two’s worth of runs, at most, being added to their projections.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 3, 2008 8:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So you recommend the Mariners "going for it" in 2009?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 3, 2008 8:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

In fact how about this plan:

1) Sign Manny and make him full time DH
2) Sign Dunn and make him full time 1B
3) Trade Jeff Clement, Wladimir Balentien, Michael Saunders, Carlos Triunfel, Phillippe Aumont and Juan Ramirez to the Rockies for Matt Holliday and Aaron Cook
4) Trade Carlos Silva, Yuniesky Betancourt and $8M to the Dodgers for Hu Chin-lung and Juan Pierre. Make Hu starting SS and have Pierre compete with Reed for CF.

Is that team now the favorite to win the AL West in 2009?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 3, 2008 8:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

By the way let's say Manny costs 5 years $100MM and Dunn 6 years $100M

So the payroll jumps in 2009 by about $50M but falls after that when Beltre and Holliday leave. I guess if they wanted they could cut payroll further by trading Dunn, Johjima and Manny — Marlins style.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 3, 2008 8:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So they contend in '09? Then disintegrate in 2010? Plus they lose Clement, Balentien etc.

One year of maybe contention for many more years of obscurity? Wouldn’t they be better off just rebuilding now and making a team that will contend for years, not a year?

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 3, 2008 9:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Sure if you really believe in Clement, Balentien et al, but I don't really

If you can stomach the payroll you could re-sign Beltre, although not Holliday.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 3, 2008 9:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Despite their lucky run to the WS title, the 2003 Marlins are not a business model that anyone should be following

Yes, this team would quite probably be the favorites in 2009, but after 2009, it’s a cellar dweller for 5 years, maybe more. In today’s “8 team playoff crapshoot” world, that’s not a strategy that makes any sense.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 3, 2008 9:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

How is a 5 year cellar dweller any worse than what they are now?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 3, 2008 9:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Sure, so why not use the financial resources to win now. The farm isn't

that good and Jack can rebuild it in his image with some breathing room. Use the next few years with Ichiro to build a winner around him. The division isn’t good. Take it before the Rangers rise and dominate it.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 4, 2008 5:53 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The Rangers?

So you expect them to actually develop competent pitching?

by thejd44 on Nov 4, 2008 9:09 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But they keep trading away the good ones.

I seriously question Jon Daniels’ ability to generally manage a baseball team.

by thejd44 on Nov 5, 2008 9:37 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The farm is nowhere near as bad as people think.

There’s a ton of talent, it’s just a couple years away. The higher levels aren’t in great shape, but Bavasi didn’t have the chance to trade away the still developing talent.

J.K.L.

by acblue on Nov 4, 2008 12:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No, it's bad

People have posted stuff about it on minorleagueball.com, and as far as I can tell there isn’t a single player I’d give more than a B grade to.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 4, 2008 3:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's really, really not.

I read (and occasionally comment at) Minor League Ball, and those people don’t know nearly as much as they think they do. The people whose opinions most well informed Mariners fans trust (when it comes to the farm system at least) all tend to agree that there is a ton of talent at the lower levels of the system and a lot of high risk/high reward talent at the middle and upper levels. And Triunfel is easily B+/A at this point.

J.K.L.

by acblue on Nov 4, 2008 10:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So you'd dump the veterans for whatever prospects you can

get and turn the reins over to the prospects rather than trading them?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 5, 2008 5:13 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If it were up to me...

I might consider trading some of the less exciting but more sure-thing prospects (Adam Moore springs immediately to mind ) packaged with certain veterans if the return was good enough. I’d make upgrading the defense my #1 priority, even if it means putting up with poor offensive contributions at SS and CF. I would not for a second entertain the notion of pursuing an Ichiro trade. I wouldn’t sell low on Bedard, especially considering that the most recent news on his shoulder is really encouraging.

In other words, I wouldn’t have an all out fire-sale and punt ‘09, but I wouldn’t make an active push to be competitive either. I think the biggest mistake the Mariners could make would be to completely ignore what looks to be a pretty good FA class this year because they don’t plan to compete. FA contracts tend to go longer than one season.

J.K.L.

by acblue on Nov 5, 2008 1:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Treading water?

Neither an all-out rebuild nor contention? Sounds like the Orioles.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 5, 2008 5:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's not really a similar situation at all.

The Mariners have talent. Felix Hernandez, Erik Bedard, Adrian Beltre, Ichiro, Jeff Clement, Brandon Morrow and (to a lesser extent) Jose Lopez are all valuable pieces. The Mariners have a very solid bullpen and a surplus of suitable replacements kicking around AAA. Their biggest holes are at 1B and DH, which are the easiest spots to fill. Sign someone like Furcal, get someone cheap and undervalued to play 1B/DH and improve the outfield defense and hey, relevance.

Jeff Sullivan and Dave Cameron both outline common sense plans for next season. It’s not the way it’s usually done, but there’s no reason it can’t work.

J.K.L.

by acblue on Nov 5, 2008 6:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Incremental changes on a 100 loss $100M payroll

team strike me as treading water.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 5, 2008 6:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Cameron's plan doesn't sound feasible

I doubt you get the Brewers interested in Washburn and they don’t need Lopez, certainly not at the cost of Hart. Also Brad Nelson? Really?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 5, 2008 6:45 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Sullivan's plan is apparently spelled out in Part 2

I’m not sure where that is. In any case neither his not Cameron’s proposed teams sounds like they’d be very good.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 5, 2008 6:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Whoops a doodle.

Part two of Jeff’s post.

The point isn’t turning the team into the favorite to win the division, it’s putting a decent enough team to stay relevant (and with the right breaks, make some noise down the stretch) while rebuilding the farm system.

The Mariners were awful in large part because they got sub replacement level production from the two easiest spots on the diamond to fill with productive bats. Upgrade those two positions to league average, experience some regression, and this is a much better team. Not good, but not 100 loss bad either. Incremental upgrades to another position or two and you might be in the race past July. Do it again in 2010 and you might be in the thick of things, all without suffering through three or four horrible years or trading away the farm.

J.K.L.

by acblue on Nov 5, 2008 7:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

doesn't

trying to stay respectable-but-not-contending hamper your rebuilding efforts? Beane calls that reloading, but his teams have been playoff contenders while doing so. What good does it do the M’s to be semi-sort of good versus really bad? The best thing I can think of is retaining fans, and if you’re the GM, keeping your job.

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 5, 2008 8:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Keeping fans is important for the Mariners.

It’s how they can afford to run $100 million payroll teams out there. And really, I don’t think it hampers the rebuilding efforts all that much, especially if you have the scouting department the Mariners have.

I understand the point, and I don’t think it’s necessarily a bad thing to go into rebuilding mode, but I don’t think it’s the best course of action. It’s almost certainly what’s going to happen, though, so we’ll see.

J.K.L.

by acblue on Nov 5, 2008 8:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

eh it's probably marginal either way

unless your holding on to Beltre for mediocrity’s sake rather than trading him for a boatload of prospects. However, I don’t think anyone is going to go trading crazy for him anyway. But I really want him for the A’s.

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 5, 2008 9:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

In a just world he'd fetch a King's ransom.

He’s a star through means that no one fully appreciates.

J.K.L.

by acblue on Nov 5, 2008 10:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

so it ellis, my friend, so is ellis...

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 5, 2008 10:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely.

When I become the President of Baseball Land people will fully appreciate players like Ellis and Beltre.

J.K.L.

by acblue on Nov 5, 2008 10:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

and please, oh please, can we have Mark Mulders' arm back and fully reattached?

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 5, 2008 10:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Jeff's team is pretty bad

I don’t see either his nor Dave’s team competing unless they really overachieve like 2007

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 5, 2008 10:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The Orioles have talent too, like Adam Jones!

Heh heh heh.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 5, 2008 7:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

zing!

Save Rajai Davis

by oakinboston on Nov 6, 2008 7:28 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

or the Rangers

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 5, 2008 8:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I trust MY opinions.

My opinions, reviewing the individual players of the Mariners farm system, are that there is not a single player that I would give more than a B grade to. There are a handful of strikeout-prone hackers with horrible plate discipline, a couple of decent young pitchers miles away from the majors, and Carlos Triunfel. And that’s it.

I’m sorry to burst your bubble here. If there’s a specific player you’re thinking of, I’ll be perfectly happy to explain why he does not warrant more than a B grade.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 5, 2008 8:44 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't necessarily disagree that Triunfel is the only prospect in the system that warrants more than a B grade.

I think you’re underestimating the amount of B grade prospects in the system, and I think you’re overlooking the possibility that a lot of those B grade prospects are more than capable of developing into B+/A- prospects.

I’m not saying the farm system is in great shape; clearly it’s not. What I am saying is that it’s not in ruins, that I trust the track record of Engle and Fontaine when it comes to finding talent in the later rounds that seemingly comes out of nowhere, and that I trust Zduriencik’s ability to develop talent much more than I trusted Bavasi.

And I want to be clear that I’m not discounting your opinions; I read your posts here, at LL, at MiLB and at BtBS. You’re a smart, well informed guy. It’s just that I value the opinions of Dave Cameron, Conor Glassey, Jason Churchill and Jay Yencich more than I do yours when it comes to this particular subject, because they know more about the Mariners’ minor league system than just about anyone.

J.K.L.

by acblue on Nov 5, 2008 1:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The Mariners have tons of money.

They don’t have to “rebuild” in the traditional sense. They can add talent and be competitive in 2009 without sacrificing any major part of the future.

J.K.L.

by acblue on Nov 3, 2008 10:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, like last year when they signed Carlos Silva. Wait...

Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.

by Joey C. on Nov 4, 2008 3:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

In reply to that last sentence, you mean their projections without signings/trades, right?

In light of that, I would agree that they aren’t an outstanding team at all currently. But we all know that they are going to do something, and push themselves to the high 80/low 90 win plateu. And, of course, if they can keep outproducing their Pythag record, they could be even better (I have no clue whether that’s an actual coincidence or not).

'That's something we do...thirteen hits and not score'-Terrence Long

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 3, 2008 8:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Saddest news of all
It must be a tough time to be a sports fan in the state of Washington. The Mariners just lost 100 games with their $100 million payroll. The Seahawks are, as of me writing this paragraph, 2-5, which while not technically out of contention in the fetid cesspool that is the NFC West, is pretty gosh-darned close. The basketball team just up and left for Oklahoma City, of all places, after trying and failing to extort a huge cash giveaway from the citizens.

But as bad as those are, worse than any of them is the news that came on Tuesday: Tuba Man, after a brutal assault two weeks ago, has died from his injuries.

Those of you who haven’t been in Seattle won’t know anything about Tuba Man, but think of similar characters in Oakland and you’ll understand how it feels.

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Nov 6, 2008 8:09 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms
Start posting about the Athletics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Wishyouwerehere250_small
AFL PitchFX Pt. 1: James Simmons
Imgp0089_editedagasin_small
DLD 11/24/09 - Fine, I'll make another video game dump
Me_at_att_park_small
Greener Grass, Episode 7: Transportation Proclamation
Me_at_att_park_small
Old McPherson is an A, e yi e yi yoooooooo
Depaulbluedemons_small
Community Prospect List #18

Recent FanPosts

Waregroupcheck_small
DLD 11.25.09 - Thanksgiving eve
Pulp_fiction_small
A's interested in Cuban defector Arguelles
Small
The A's Move to Oakland in 1968
Funny-pictures12_small
If Jack Cust Traded, Then To Whom And For What?
Small
Jack Cust Drawing Trade Interest?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Tyler_at_maya_school_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

As_kings_cal_small louismg

Editors

Countdown_small Taj Adib

Ziegler160px_small Flashfire

527918550406_0_bg_small notsellingjeans