Athletics Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

The Reverse Crosby Effect

Update: Matt Holliday will be on KNBR at 4:30PM, talking about the trade. Thanks Louis for the tip!

Since there appears to be absolutely nothing going on with the A’s lately, let’s talk about the season premiere of LOST starting on January 21st.

(snip)

Maybe I shouldn’t use the automatic post feature too many days in advance during the off-season.

You know a baseball story is big when it actually breaks into Monday Night Football. There I was, watching some team masquerading as the 49ers actually playing football semi-successfully, and there was a “Game Break” for baseball news.

For anyone who has ever watched one minute of the NFL, Game Breaks are hardly ever about baseball, and never about the A’s. I started to tune out the latest Manny/Jeter/Boston/Yankees news when all of a sudden I heard, “Oakland A’s”. They were covering our trade! This is big, people!

Not that we should judge a trade based on the media attention that it received, but the outside reaction is great. Personally, I am thrilled with the addition, the direction the team is going, and the words “We Are Competing for 2009” have never sounded so sweet, particularly after the excruciating months of July, August, and September of this year. It’s nice to have something to write about and look forward to. (Insert shameless plug for ticket sales here.)

Billy Beane has made some amazing trades; he has made some shocking trades, and overall, you could probably argue that there are very few of his trades that have really come back to haunt him. For every Hudson trade that hasn’t panned out, we have a Mulder trade that just keeps on giving, and although we have been playing with Bobby Crosby as our shortstop for years, have watched Ethier develop in blue instead of green and gold, and have watched a number of ex-A’s in the 2008 playoffs, by and large, A’s fans have trusted Beane and the teams he has fielded.

I understand that in any trade, you must give away talent to get talent in return, and don’t get me wrong, I really love this trade (assuming we can lock Holliday into an actual contract), but I can’t help but wonder if what I'm experiencing is the reverse Crosby effect. I feel that Beane waited far too long for Crosby to turn into the player he was projected to be, was far too patient in this wait, and may very well have expected too much from him from the start. But in any case, I feel that we have seen what Crosby has to offer the A's, and at best, he's a servicable middle infielder.

In the case of Carlos Gonzalez, I have the opposite feeling. I wonder if we've seen even a glimmer of who this player could be in a couple of years; if we let him go for the sure star a little too early. Gonzalez had a disappointing rookie season, to be sure, and a dismal second half, but were there flashes of superstar that showed on occasion? In two years, are we going to regret letting this player go when he finds his power stroke and is hitting for average?

Will it be worth it? Will Holliday be who the A's think he will be? Can the A's keep him? Will his year(s) with the A's outpace Gonzalez' performance in the years he would have played in Oakland? Is playing for 2009 worth it? Could the A's have waited out another season for their young talent to develop?

Probably.

Then I remember July, August, and September. I remember the empty(ier) seats at the ballpark. I remember 80 comment game threads here on AN.

And then I think of .325/25.

Welcome to Oakland, Matt Holliday! We'll nickname you soon.

Poll
Initial reaction to the trade?
YES!
840 votes
NO!
241 votes

1081 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 260 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I voted yes

but I feel like the parts might be worth more than the whole. I would like the reserve the right to knee jerk till after the deal is completed officially and after Col has flipped anyone involved.

by laxtonto on Nov 12, 2008 7:41 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Wait and see

  I do find one thing very strange in that the dodgers have a offer on the table for Manny to sign but until thursday. Could Holiday be flipped to the dodgers in a deal for Kemp and some other players? I will not get to excited about Holiday in a A’s uniform until opening day. As for the Crosby effect yes I agree Beane may be tired of all the good news on prospect until they show their true colors. Can’t forget Adam Piatt who the A’s wouldn’t trade and watched his value drop faster than the stock market.

by Arcman on Nov 12, 2008 7:51 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Dude. If they're offering Kemp for Holliday.

BB needs to pull the trigger NOW.

This.

by Blicks on Nov 12, 2008 8:39 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That's hardly fair

How could one predict Piatt would get meningitis? Prior to that, he looked like a good player who would be able to contribute for several years.

Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!

by Monday Fan on Nov 12, 2008 4:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

From Ken Rosenthal in FOXSPORTS.COM

Hardy, 26, actually is more attractive than Cameron — he is nine years younger, two years away from free agency and expendable due to the rise of top shortstop prospect Alcides Escobar. Yet, one rival executive says that Hardy is not even available.

There have been some people in AN that have written in the past that they would like to see Hardy coming our way, so I added this for that reason. But now it seems like Furcal could be coming our way via FA and a lot of ANers like him too. I personally would like to add Hardy, younger with some pop. For who? Well, not any of the studs that will one day be in the A’s rotation. Thoughts??

Anything is better than BC at SS.
Adios from FL.

Billy Beane plays with the A's like Legos.

by OakFaninFL on Nov 12, 2008 7:53 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Many fans, on many teams

would love to add Hardy. But, not give any potential future studs. Even though, as Rosenthal reports here, the Brewers have shown little interest to trade him, especially when the other team doesn’t want to give up potential future studs.

I’m not directing this against you speficifally, or attacking you, but fans of teams that need a SS, need to get over the idea the he is “expendable” due to the rise of Escobar, and can be obtained without giving up any potential future studs. For one, he’s not “expendable”. Rickie Weeks isn’t doing anything much at 2b.

ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524

by rfloh on Nov 12, 2008 8:10 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No offense taken....

I thought it was interesting that he wrote “could be dangled” for pitching help. I agree that many teams would jump if he was available, but the cost will be high and I do not see BB making a move. I threw this out because I have read some posts in AN regarding Hardy. It would be nice to get him, but unrealistic at this point I imagine.

Billy Beane plays with the A's like Legos.

by OakFaninFL on Nov 12, 2008 8:19 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

hardy

he’s basically what we hoped a healthy and productive crosby would’ve been

street or a healthy duke i would’ve offered…not possible anymore

basically, other option pay up for furcal or find an mlb ready SS

by Asfan4ever723 on Nov 12, 2008 9:04 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

More from that article.....

Shortstop J.J. Hardy also could be dangled for pitching help but so far is drawing only nibbles.

Billy Beane plays with the A's like Legos.

by OakFaninFL on Nov 12, 2008 7:55 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I would love to pick up Hardy

I don’t know what Mil is asking but if it is not one of the big prospects.

"AN, Reducing Work Productivity since 2003", connie mack 11/06/08

by adragon on Nov 12, 2008 8:13 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Nibbles?

Colorado is going to trade Greg Smith for Hardy?

Did you overpay for those eggs? @('.')@

by monkeyball on Nov 12, 2008 9:50 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm just not sure about Gonzalez

Yes, he’s got a tremendous amount of talent and he put up decent minor league numbers. But he is nowhere near ready to hit at the major league level. He didn’t hit for power, had a horrible BB:K ratio, and in general struggled with a decent number of at-bats.

I think Beane feels Carlos is too far away from being a good hitter, and I agree with that. I don’t think Gonzalez will be an effective major leaguer until 2011. And we can’t really afford to wait that long given the stadium deal and the young pitching being fully ready by 2010.

I’m also not sure that Gonzalez’ ceiling is quite as high as everyone makes it out to be. He’s not going to be a center fielder by the time he develops, he doesn’t have the range. His bat isn’t really all that valuable considering that to have a competitive lineup, you need to provide power at the corner OF positions. He doesn’t project as a true power bat; at most he’ll hit around 25 HRs. And his plate discipline will never be that great, which means he’ll have to hit .280-.290 to really be an asset at his position. That’s tough to do before age 26 or so.

Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?

by baseb3383 on Nov 12, 2008 7:56 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Carlos Gonzalez was an outstanding CF this season

The notion that he cannot play the position is ridiculous unless he suddenly puts on 60 pounds of pudge.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 12, 2008 9:56 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

ah, the old sophomore 60.

probably would be useful for winter in Colorado.

Save Rajai Davis

by oakinboston on Nov 12, 2008 10:02 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Pudge?

Colorado is going to sign Ivan Rodriguez and strap (part of) him to Patrol Craft?

Did you overpay for those eggs? @('.')@

by monkeyball on Nov 12, 2008 10:17 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That's a little light for Pudge

Maybe it was supposed to be 60 pounds of fudge? Of course it’s hard to play center field with Joe Blanton chasing you around the outfield drooling…

"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox

by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 13, 2008 10:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I take that back

I looked at his FRAR and it’s above average. I still don’t think he’s going to be a useful hitter, but his okay bat in CF will be an asset. Just not as much of one as we would’ve hoped.

Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?

by baseb3383 on Nov 12, 2008 10:49 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Don't use FRAR

Use RZR, or +/-, or Sean Smith projections, or best and most ideally all three of them.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 12, 2008 10:54 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Is ZR chopped liver?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 12, 2008 3:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's more or less redundant with +/-

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 12, 2008 5:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

RZR is redundant with plus minus

Zone rating is redundant if you have UZR.

RZR is the free less good version of plus minus. Zone rating is the freeless good version of UZR.

ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524

by rfloh on Nov 12, 2008 10:45 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He looked lost at the plate

I know he is young but from what I saw last year I think we got the best of this deal. I hope we are able to sign Holliday to a long term contract but even if we don’t I think the prospects/picks will make up for it. I am not sold on Carlos being an allstar level talent, (no plate discipline). In BB we trust!!!

"AN, Reducing Work Productivity since 2003", connie mack 11/06/08

by adragon on Nov 12, 2008 8:03 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

The Sheehan article mentioned in a different thread made a GREAT comparison...

Carlos Gonzalez, if he never improves his plate discipline, = Juan Encarnacion

"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox

by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 13, 2008 10:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's pretty impossible to call Matt "Greggles", right?

I probably should get over that.

I was thinking about Gonzalez (problably more than I should admit) and what we might be letting go. Beane has been praised for trading a player at the right time, but this is clearly different in that Gonzalez hasn’t been around long enough to become a fan favorite (unless you’re a girl, I suppose).

Speaking of, for all the fan favorites that we’ve seen leave Oakland, we can’t seem to rid ourselves of the one guy who is anything but a favorite (even if you’re a girl).

Yikes, I think I have reached my quota for sexist comments for the year my life.

I'm here to talk about the past.

by 67MARQUEZ on Nov 12, 2008 8:21 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Just replace

“unless you’re a girl” with “unless you like guys”, and “even if you’re a girl” with “even if you like guys”.

That way, you’re not making sexist comments, or discriminating against non girls who like guys. ;)

ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524

by rfloh on Nov 12, 2008 8:43 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But of course!

{Slaps self}

Slapping self is just something I like to do, BTW.

I'm here to talk about the past.

by 67MARQUEZ on Nov 12, 2008 10:56 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Who's the guy we can't get rid of? Croz?

I am the one person who wants to keep him; our hotness quotient is already far too depleted, and I can’t stand to lose another.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 11:47 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But Ryan Sweeney is still on the team....for now.

The AN girls should be content. Him and Buck.

And Crosby sucks.

This.

by Blicks on Nov 12, 2008 12:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The thing is,

we’re used to the majority of the team being easy on the eyes, not just two or three guys. Billy has spoiled us. Pretty sure he is trying to sell jeans after all…

by whiteshoes40 on Nov 12, 2008 1:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't see any notioriously ugly players on the A's though.

Unless they signed Giambi.

And, I’m betting a lot of girls like Holliday.

This.

by Blicks on Nov 12, 2008 1:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1 to whiteshoes

There were times when we had about 10 serious pieces. It’s dwindling fast. Losing Harden = my head explodes; losing Harden + Street in one year = my head explodes twice for losing two of the best asses in baseball; losing Harden + Street + Croz in one year… I don’t even know. Not to mention all this in the wake of losing Swish and Haren, etc.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 1:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

"losing two of the best asses in baseball"

Why is the first thing I think of Byrnes and Zito.

And I don’t fancy the asses of baseball players. Honestly. I don’t.

This.

by Blicks on Nov 12, 2008 1:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Hm... good points there

but I don’t know that they quite measure up to H&H, literally speaking.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 1:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yep

There goes his female fan-base. Which really sucks because on those days when we were getting our asses kicked, I at least had that going for me.

I'm here to talk about the past.

by 67MARQUEZ on Nov 12, 2008 1:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

At least we still have Chavy.

Kind of, anyway.

Sadly, the majority of A’s pics that I have saved on my computer are of Rich and Huston. Ryan’s trying to catch up, but he has a ways to go.

by whiteshoes40 on Nov 12, 2008 1:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Chavvy is beautiful.

I tend to forget for lack of seeing him.

Aw, Rich and Huston are my saved-pic frontrunners, too, with a big folder each. Yes, Ry is trying to catch up for me, too!

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 1:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I am swooning with all the talk of the hotness.

Never realized we had so many hotties. :-)

39 remarkable innings.

by ZigFan31 on Nov 12, 2008 1:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Never realized? Aw dear hon, you missed the golden age.

Is it the end of an era? I think I have to say so. Street puts the nail in the coffin.

End of an Era.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 1:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Okay, this could merit a novel, but I'm gonna put together a quick one

SP – Rich, RP – Huston, 1B – dunno, Mietkiewicz? Mike Jacobs? 2B – Ellis is good enough for me, SS – Bob, 3B – DWright, LF – Daniel Murphy, CF – RyRy, RF – dunno, Ryan Church?

That was the quick-and-dirty, All Current-or-Former Athletic-or-Met All-Hot Team, as it turns out.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 2:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

How about C?

Russell Martin? Who am I forgetting? There must be someone hotter?

39 remarkable innings.

by ZigFan31 on Nov 12, 2008 2:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, duh. Thanks!

I’ll go to the minors on this one and say Recker.
I always liked Lieberthal, not gonna lie.
The easy choice would be Joe Mauer, for most.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 2:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

Too generic-looking for me, but I agree that he’s the universally accepted one. Points to you.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 2:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I guess.

I’m more of a Russell Martin kind of girl. Mauer is alright. You won’t get an arguement from me.

39 remarkable innings.

by ZigFan31 on Nov 12, 2008 2:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

3B — Chavy
RF — Travis
1B — a young Miguel Cabrera?

I just discovered there’s a minor leaguer in the NL (?) named Ryan Bear. No joke.

by whiteshoes40 on Nov 12, 2008 2:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

[sob]

Ryan will be the core of the New Age of Hottness.

by whiteshoes40 on Nov 12, 2008 1:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Please don't forget about CarGon.

I know he wasn’t with us long, but he knew how wear street clothes.

39 remarkable innings.

by ZigFan31 on Nov 12, 2008 2:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I would beg to differ...

Sweeney + Buck DO NOT = Crosby, not even close!!

Throw Hanahan into the equation and then we are talking! Still doesn’t compare, but at least you are getting warmer!

"He's day-to-day," Geren said. "But aren't we all?" - 5/29/08

by BobbyCrosbysGirl on Nov 12, 2008 1:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He isnt' bad

He just isn’t as good as every (AN) expected him to be. Those were some pretty damn high standards he needed to live up to!

Besides, I thought we were talking about looks. Since when does being pretty have anything to do with baseball ability, I mean look at “The Franchise” across the bay!! Good God!

"He's day-to-day," Geren said. "But aren't we all?" - 5/29/08

by BobbyCrosbysGirl on Nov 12, 2008 1:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Fine.

Being one of the worst starting SS in MLB isn’t “not living up to high standards”.

Fine, he’s attractive (to some people, at least).

Franchise isn’t really ugly as much as he gets too many people out. I like the walk-a-thon starring Giants pitchers.

This.

by Blicks on Nov 12, 2008 1:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, he certainly is NOT HOT!

Yes, he is talented and that is fine and dandy, but good greif! It is called Invisiline dude! You can afford it!

"He's day-to-day," Geren said. "But aren't we all?" - 5/29/08

by BobbyCrosbysGirl on Nov 12, 2008 1:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh yeah.

Him and whoever else had the 5th spot behind Franchise, Cain, and Sanchez.

This.

by Blicks on Nov 12, 2008 1:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I was talking to BCG...

and referring to the that fact that Zito is HOT and can’t pitch.

39 remarkable innings.

by ZigFan31 on Nov 12, 2008 2:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Anyone who plays on the Giants comes with a certain degree of hideousness though.

Exception given to the players who actually entertain in Giants uniforms (although I do like to watch Lincecum pitch sometimes, just not in that Giants uniform. Someone please fleece Sabean for Lincecum).

This.

by Blicks on Nov 12, 2008 1:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, I'm stating it without regard to team lines.

Lincecum would be hideous even if he were an A.
Actually, he would seem twice as hideous for standing next to some of our good ones.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 1:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think he's just at an awkward stage.

I’m hoping he just needs a few more years to develop. Am I grasping at straws?

39 remarkable innings.

by ZigFan31 on Nov 12, 2008 2:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He's pretty old to be at an awkward stage...

I guess I should keep an open mind, because have you ever seen DWright as a youngster? Total goof.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 2:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I haven't.

Some guys need to grow into it. Others are just blessed and born with hotness…RyRy and Chavy are good examples.

39 remarkable innings.

by ZigFan31 on Nov 12, 2008 2:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yoo old to be at an awkward stage?

Dude’s like 13.

Children, until we have taught them better, will be perfectly happy with a seasonal round of games in which conkers succeeds hopscotch.

by salb918 on Nov 12, 2008 4:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i know gonzalez young/we rushed him/hes got all the tools etc...

but his minor league numbers dont jump out at me. i have no doubt he can be a good player. but theres nothing about http://minors.baseball-reference.com/players.cgi?pid=5563 that justifies the hype in my opinion. im glad we traded him.

by travdog6 on Nov 12, 2008 8:24 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I voted no

but only because the poll asked for an initial reaction. As I’ve read summaries of Gonzalez’ performance so far and projections based on that performance, I’ve come around, and am excited to see Holliday in an A’s uniform next season.

And, what it all comes down to is ticket sales and regional popularity. Carlos was one of the main reasons I watched the A’s last season, along with Suzuki, Ryan Sweeney and some of the pitchers. But while I’m more casual a fan than many on here, I’m also more dedicated a fan than your average bay area resident.

I think that if the A’s go the path that’s being speculated upon here, i.e. adding a couple of more FAs and going for it in ’09, people like me (and those more casual) will buy more tickets.

So, after an initial NO, …. YES!

"God doesn't pay attention to your cute little hypotheticals." -- Jeff from LL

by oblique on Nov 12, 2008 8:25 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Hardy or Escobar?

  I would rather have escobar from the braves but at what cost? For Hardy I may offer up a Eveland, Outman, or a Duke but not much more. What do you do with Crosby if you get another ss? Ship him to BJ or someoen else. Furcal looks like the best option if he is healthy.

by Arcman on Nov 12, 2008 8:36 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I voted No!!

But that was mostly because my eyes focused in on the name “Greg Smith.” I didn’t care who we were getting in return for him, I don’t want to see him go! Now that I have had a couple of days to get use to the information, I am very happy about this trade. I am still hesitating to tell a friend of mine about the Huston Street part of this deal. I want to see an actual press release before I break the news to her. I want to be SURE it is official before I go and break her heart. I don’t think she even knows who Holliday is, all she cares about is Huston and this will crush her!

As for the “Crosby Effect,” did you really think you would get away with talking like this about my boy without me chiming in? Look, I understand that he isn’t the greatest SS to ever grace the field. And I can admit that he hasn’t lived up to MOST of AN’s expectations of him. But we have also seen a lot worse. There are several people on our CURRENT roster who have made me want to pull the hair right out of my head on a number of occasions. And yes, I admit, there have been a few times when I have heald my breath hoping he wouldn’t throw the ball into outer space when trying to rush a throw to first. And there have been a number of times when I have screamed at the TV “BOBBY!!! WTF!??! Why are you swinging at that pitch!! HAVE YOU LEARNED NOTHING!?!” I can understand the frustration, completely! But can we just cut him a little bit of slack, just for the off season? Please? IF/When Billy trades my boy away, you will all be jumping for joy, and I will understand your excitement. But I will NOT be celebrating with you. No matter who we get in return, that will not be a good day in my baseball world. So to hear all of you shout to the roof tops how much you want his ass shipped off to Egypt, gets very exhausting for me. I get it, I do! There are a couple of players that I feel the same way about. All I am asking is that we chill out just a bit on Crosby. Until he is shipped off, he is still on our team, he is one of us, and I love him!

"He's day-to-day," Geren said. "But aren't we all?" - 5/29/08

by BobbyCrosbysGirl on Nov 12, 2008 8:47 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I understand everything you say, but we haven't seen a lot worse, unless you mean Johnnie LeMaster

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 12, 2008 3:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I totally understand and agree with what you're saying about Bobby

Good for you for sticking by him. I’ve always liked him, too.

by luvsmrZ on Nov 12, 2008 4:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

A lot of Gonzalez' "value" was wrapped up in uncertainty.

The thing is, the minimum value that a player can have is replacement value. If Gonzalez projects to be, say, average, but with a large uncertainty, then you might imagine the following possibilities:

>5.5 WAR (superstar) 5%
>4.5 WAR (star) 10%
>3.5 WAR (above-average) 25%
>2.5 WAR (average) 50%
>1.5 WAR (below average) 75%
>0.0 WAR (bust) 95%

This, illustratively, can be considered the CarGo we acquired. In this situation, he could be equally likely to be above or below average. But since he has some possibility of becoming a star, a weighted average might be something like 2.67 WAR.

Now, with an extra year of data, we are less uncertain about how CarGo projects. The data suggest that he is less likely to be a star or superstar. So now imagine the distribution of possible outcomes looks like this:

>5.5 WAR (superstar) 0%
>4.5 WAR (star) 7%
>3.5 WAR (above-average) 20%
>2.5 WAR (average) 50%
>1.5 WAR (below average) 75%
>0.0 WAR (bust) 95%

So even if his projection remains the same, even if he is as likely to be above average as below average, the decrease in uncertainty changes the weighted mean to 2.47 WAR because we more certain that he will be average to above-average and more certain that he is not as likely to be a star or superstar.

So, if this is the A’s thinking, then Gonzalez is not as valuable to them today as he was when he was acquired. The more he plays, the more certain his projection going forward becomes, and the more sense it makes to extract his value now since additional certainty will only hurt his value.

The other thing: Aaron Cunningham (this is for you PT). I don’t know if this has been addressed in the 2000+ comments on the Holliday thread previously, but:

Cunningham is six months younger than Gonzalez and has a 311/384/496 minor league line compared to .286/.340/.473 for Gonzalez. Cunningham has also sustained his success through the high minors while Gonzalez had most of his success in the low minors. I would not be shocked if the A’s brass considered Aaron Cunningham to make uber-prospect CarGon expendable. He’s less likely to be a superstar, yes, but one could make the argument that he’s more likely to be an above-average player. It’s hard to fathom, and Gonzalez certainly has the potential to be the much better player, but this may have been key to Oakland’s thinking.

Children, until we have taught them better, will be perfectly happy with a seasonal round of games in which conkers succeeds hopscotch.

by salb918 on Nov 12, 2008 8:47 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I do math tally?

Did you overpay for those eggs? @('.')@

by monkeyball on Nov 12, 2008 9:52 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

defense?

im assuming you’re taking defense into your sample distributions of WAR, but wondering if you could expand on how this factors in. Others have been saying that regardless of how his bat will turn out, his superb defense looks to put him minimum at average overall- which to me seems like your WAR are skewed a little low.

Save Rajai Davis

by oakinboston on Nov 12, 2008 10:13 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Just illustrative.

No idea what the actual numbers are.

Children, until we have taught them better, will be perfectly happy with a seasonal round of games in which conkers succeeds hopscotch.

by salb918 on Nov 12, 2008 10:23 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

OK, but....

First, I think that trying to make any such judgment, or swing your perception of Gonzalez’s future star potential, so profoundly on the basis of a half-season of play is arbitrary and capricious, and second, Cunningham and Gonzalez are not even remotely close to mutually exclusive prospects.

I find it pretty troubling that the tone of the site toward Gonzalez has suddenly changed from “ra, ra, future star” to “geez, he sucks, get him out of town” overnight. I mean, I know we’re not objective about the team’s prospects, but this is just ridiculous.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 12, 2008 10:14 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not saying I AGREE with the thinking.

Just throwing it out there.

Children, until we have taught them better, will be perfectly happy with a seasonal round of games in which conkers succeeds hopscotch.

by salb918 on Nov 12, 2008 10:24 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Personally...

The man has always scared me. He has always looked like a strong possibility of a bust, and I had been telling myself over and over that he was just a rookie and would get better. I still think that could easily happen of course, but Im happy to be rid of the uncertainty especially after he went the wrong direction last year in terms of development.

www.punditpolitics.com - Political IQ Tests, Pundit Blog, News and Opinion.

by ChadGod on Nov 12, 2008 10:28 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He's not going to be a bust

He’ll be a solid player. I think this is a case of the fact that his prospect status was/is a little overhyped and we made a move while his value is still fairly high.

I don’t think Sal was inferring that Gonzalez will suck. The vast majority of people on here don’t think that. You might want to tone down the hyperbole.

Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?

by baseb3383 on Nov 12, 2008 10:52 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I've heard more criticism of him in two days on this site

than I did in the preceding 11 months.

I think my critique is amply justified.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 12, 2008 11:04 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I've noticed it too

Now that he’s not “our guy” any more the kool-aid shades come off and the haterade shades go on. Now I’m thirsty…

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on Nov 12, 2008 12:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

*shrug*

I’ve never really liked Gonzales, because, one, I’m skeptical of minor league offensive numbers from the DBacks system, and two, Gonzales’ numbers are so-so.

And I’ve always liked Cunningham.

Can’t speak for anyone else obviously.

ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524

by rfloh on Nov 12, 2008 12:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wait a second ...

1. That justifies your second paragraph above (regarding the community), not your first (regarding sal).

2. sal’s opinions tend to be precisely the opposite of arbitrary and capricious (I am laughing just typing those words). I don’t think he in any way suggested a “profound” revision in the general perception of Gonzalez’s potential. “Modest” would be a better word. You are (capriciously) conflating his comment with other (less measured) recently expressed opinions on the site.

3. Are you saying that Gonzalez’s 300+ PA’s should not be considered at all when evaluating his future? I’d guess no. They should be considered in the context of his overall body of work, age, indications of improvement, etc., right? And if that’s the case, you’d think those PA’s (given their suckitude) might have diminished his standing somewhat, though not massively. Which is what sal said.

by 74mk on Nov 12, 2008 12:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not attacking salb... he's measured and reasonable, as always

I feel, however, like it’s acting to justify opinions which are not really justified.

If you look at the actual (albeit notional) numbers he presented, the difference in value is about 0.2 WAR, or 1 win over the course of a player’s pre-free agency career. That’s trivial.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 12, 2008 1:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Gotcha

Offensively, Gonzalez strikes me as a slightly worse version of pre-Diamondbacks Luis Gonzalez. I guess if he can do that and play CF really well, he’ll be pretty damn valuable. But I’ve never really understood all the “superstar” rhapsodizing, or why this “tools” were deemed to be so superior.

by 74mk on Nov 12, 2008 1:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wait...you're saying being "measured" and "reasonable" are good things?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 12, 2008 3:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Um, yes.

Seems unobjectionable.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 12, 2008 5:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Dude. This is AN. Everything is objectionable.

If I don't comment on your comment how will you know you are completely wrong? -Rocktopus

by pam5981 on Nov 12, 2008 6:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No one wants to be the local Debbie Downer

Those of us that really didn’t like what we saw didn’t want to jump to unfounded conclusions. At least I speak for myself here, but now that he is gone, I can say that I was afraid without raining on the parade.

www.punditpolitics.com - Political IQ Tests, Pundit Blog, News and Opinion.

by ChadGod on Nov 12, 2008 2:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think people were reluctant to express their qualms about his potential while he was still "the guy we got for Haren".

Now he’s a Rockie, and we are free to qualm away.

"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox

by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 13, 2008 10:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i like the deal

my only issue they may have sold low on street…couldve got a haul from him separately since more teams are jumping into the mix for closers help. whatever more prospects wouldve added to a holliday deal, would’ve it been recouped with another street deal. he was really their best remaining mlb quality trade chip

otherwise A’s have in house replacements for every player they gave up to take over and didnt touch the farm system

by Asfan4ever723 on Nov 12, 2008 9:01 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Ouch

The 80 comment game threads was a hit to the gut. Makes me sick. Oh, and according the the updated-before-real-life Wikipedia, Matt Holliday already has a nickname.

Big Daddy.

"I believe in spiritual rebirth, and I can't wait to experience that." --Barry Zito

by GreenNGoldGirl on Nov 12, 2008 9:06 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Ew.

There’s gotta be something better.

by danmerqury on Nov 12, 2008 9:12 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah. No.

Anything that I can picture Rex Hudler saying is a no go.

"I know they're the defending World Champs, but they are the whiniest team in baseball" -Rays announcers

by baseballgirl on Nov 12, 2008 9:34 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL!

"Don't be an ass!" --Bill King

by batgirl on Nov 12, 2008 1:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

so, if i'm reading this post right

if it works out well, thumbs up to billy beane.

if it goes bad, it’s all bobby crosby’s fault.

seems fair to me

BB should send scouts to watch cricket players.

by alea iacta est on Nov 12, 2008 9:14 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Not crosby's fault

  Crosby is the poster child of the A’s for the next big allsta that doesn’t pan out. Crosby is a average defensive SS but a below average bat. Just a average player. I just wish he would wear some glasses to see the ball better. His vision on the baseball to me is slow. When he guesses on the pitch correctly he nails it but to few times between guesses. I have always felt his batting problems come from his poor vision.

by Arcman on Nov 12, 2008 9:19 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting comment on the vision

And you’re exactly right. I use Crosby only because I think that Crosby was the A’s “best shot at a superstar” when he was brought up, and I have heard the same description applied to Gonzalez. I wanted to see more of CarGon, but I’m not overly sad about it now. Talk to me in 2 years.

"I know they're the defending World Champs, but they are the whiniest team in baseball" -Rays announcers

by baseballgirl on Nov 12, 2008 9:32 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i was just

making a funny.

BB should send scouts to watch cricket players.

by alea iacta est on Nov 12, 2008 9:40 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

:-)

I laughed. Everything is Crosby’s fault, of course. ;-)

"I know they're the defending World Champs, but they are the whiniest team in baseball" -Rays announcers

by baseballgirl on Nov 12, 2008 10:01 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Someone should tell you that you're awesome.

If I don't comment on your comment how will you know you are completely wrong? -Rocktopus

by pam5981 on Nov 12, 2008 10:07 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The fact we don't tell her that

is of course Crosby’s fault.

"You know, a long time ago being crazy meant something. Nowadays everybody's crazy."

-Charles Manson

by kaweahkaweah on Nov 12, 2008 10:19 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

do i smell a new nickname for Crosby?

W

Beane's World!! Excellent!!! Rock On, Beane! Rock On, Geren!

by Satchmo22 on Nov 12, 2008 11:06 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You're awesome.

Geez, do I have to do everything around here?

"God doesn't pay attention to your cute little hypotheticals." -- Jeff from LL

by oblique on Nov 12, 2008 10:10 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Doesn't make sense to me...
Crosby is a average defensive SS but a below average bat. Just a average player.

Below Average Glove + Average Bat (although he’s below average even for a shortstop) = Below Average

No?

The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.

by rebus on Nov 12, 2008 7:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Depends

We now have two variables…what is the standard deviation?

I don’t think it’s a stretch to call him average on both counts. The guy did hit 39 doubles last year.

"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox

by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 13, 2008 10:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That sounded funnier in my head.

Screw my statistics class.

"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox

by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 13, 2008 10:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

"Assuming" we sign Holliday to a contract is Faulty

Its a doubtful ,at best, outcome in my opinion.

by GusanoQuemador on Nov 12, 2008 9:25 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Please don't ruin this moment for us.

(And sadly, I do agree with that)

"I know they're the defending World Champs, but they are the whiniest team in baseball" -Rays announcers

by baseballgirl on Nov 12, 2008 9:31 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But the thing is....

I’m still happy about the trade regardless of whether we re-sign him. I think Billy will add enough pieces this off-season to make a one year rental like this sensible.

by GusanoQuemador on Nov 12, 2008 10:31 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The thing is..

Last year the tone was “rebuilding”, so 1-year rentals this year doesn’t make much sense to me.

by VORP is too nerdy on Nov 12, 2008 11:08 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

There is no set timeline for rebuilding. Billy acquired a lot of prospects last year and this season that were projected to be major league ready and contributing in 2010, so acquiring some proven guys for ’09 makes sense in that why not start the competing now instead of just letting this coming season go to waste.

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on Nov 12, 2008 12:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree.

Giving up on a potential longer term fix in CarGon does not justify the 1 year rental. If Holliday were to sign a long term deal, my opinion would change. But that doesn’t appear to be likely. Also, if it seemed more probable that we were going to contend this year, that also might change things. But currently, it does not appear that we are.

39 remarkable innings.

by ZigFan31 on Nov 12, 2008 11:51 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Per your last sentence

Nor does it appear that we are not

by GusanoQuemador on Nov 12, 2008 12:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, in a couple of years CarGon will have huge numbers...

but they will be inflated by playing in Colorado. I hope Oakland fans have the common sense to realize that more than likely CarGon will explode in Colorado, but his numbers will be sooooo greatly inflated because of where he plays, not because he is that great. I hope we don’t jump down BB’s throat when this happens.

by bdemartin on Nov 12, 2008 9:35 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

wait and see

  Like most trades its wait and see. look at the Mulder deal and how many people said that was a bad deal. Carlos doubles in oakland now may become homeruns at coors. It will be interesting to see where his BA ends up and his OBA. For Beane its a big gamble but I rather have a GM gamble than do nothing. The funny thing is that Cunningham may be the better of the two. With a season in AAA he could be the future LF for the A’s.

by Arcman on Nov 12, 2008 9:47 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The thing about Coors is

the spacious outfield they have. His doubles in Oakland will become triples in CO.

by sslinger on Nov 12, 2008 10:57 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

"Reverse Crosby"

NSFW

Did you overpay for those eggs? @('.')@

by monkeyball on Nov 12, 2008 9:53 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

yeah i tried that once and got mixed reviews

apparently patience is a good thing but hitting isnt.

Save Rajai Davis

by oakinboston on Nov 12, 2008 10:22 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Now THAT'S a productive out!

"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox

by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 13, 2008 10:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's official I guess

Just got an email from the A’s about it.

Nothing we didn’t already know, although it destroys all my hopes for either Street staying or us picking up a spare part to go along.

"Camelot sure fell apart, didn't it?"-Steve McCatty

by 5Aces on Nov 12, 2008 9:57 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

so what if holliday doesn't re-sign with oakland

for the money he wants ( >$15,000,000 right?), there must be better options.

somebody mentioned cargon’s numbers being inflated by playing in colorado, and holliday’s away numbers were a bit of a dropoff from at home. he’s a great player and i love this trade, but i love it under the assumption that we’ll either be contenders this year and have 2 compensatory picks after he signs elsewhere, or that we’ll bring in a bunch of top-notch prospects/players and maybe some picks around the deadline this summer. i really do think we’ll contend, with holliday and cust combining for 70-80 home runs. if we sign another bat, or chavez is finally healthy, or one of the young guys makes a big jump over the winter, things will be looking really good. i think holliday is going to have a monster year because everybody has monster years when they’re up for a new deal.

by jlanning17 on Nov 12, 2008 10:21 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

i think they can easily absorb long term contracts

20mill from 09 will be gone from holliday,c rosby, duke, etc

everyone will be make very little other than chavez, ellis, maybe cust

by Asfan4ever723 on Nov 12, 2008 10:28 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It felt necessary..

given all of the Jack Cust hate around here.

by Jack Cust is valuable damnit on Nov 12, 2008 12:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It is necessary.

Seriously. Jack Cust is bloody underrated in all MLB.

This.

by Blicks on Nov 12, 2008 12:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not saying he's the MOST underrated player, but among A's players, he's underrated.

And, he is a slugger who’s only a slight step below a good portion of the other shitty-defense DH slugger types.

This.

by Blicks on Nov 12, 2008 12:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

more underrated:

Cust or Ellis?

Save Rajai Davis

by oakinboston on Nov 12, 2008 12:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ellis.

That contract is the dealbreaker.

This.

by Blicks on Nov 12, 2008 1:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Cust. At least Ellis was in MLB before last year.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 12, 2008 3:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Crosby

Part of me just want the A’s to fill all their non-Crosby related needs this off-season so that the pressure is really on him and then I can really get into my hate groove.

Think of all those priceless quotes, such as “ZOMG We’d be in 1st if Crosby could hit a ****ing SAC FLY.”

www.punditpolitics.com - Political IQ Tests, Pundit Blog, News and Opinion.

by ChadGod on Nov 12, 2008 10:34 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Part of me

wants to do bad things to that part of you.

:(

by VORP is too nerdy on Nov 12, 2008 10:59 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

WHy Can't We Just Keep Bobby this year...

and bat him 7th or 8th in the lineup? Sounds simplistic, huh?
The weight of the world has been placed on his shoulders as far as expectations from AN art concerned. I suppose it wasn’t fair to Bobby Crosby that every time we saw him play, we kept on expecting to see Miggy show up. His injuries have certainly curtailed his progress to the point that his years on the team don’t add up to where he is developmentally at the major league ballplayer.

I don’t think too many would argue that he has been a defensive liability and in that respect he keeps the infield defense solid especially with the return of Chavez and Ellis. With the addition of Holliday, our Linux is already changed dramatically with the assumption that Chavez will return healthy.

So why not take off any offensive expectations keep him low in the lineup and leave him alone. In the long run, if we don’t trade him he is certainly serviceable and can be a reasonable piece as part of the A’s puzzle.

"I've been accused of using too many words...I suppose that's like accusing Mozart of using too many notes." Bill King

by Gerard on Nov 12, 2008 11:00 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Sure, the team CAN keep Crosby...

but it will lose more games than if it replaces him with a decent or, better yet, actually good player.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 12, 2008 11:07 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So...Who's on your short list (beyond Furcal)...

…who is not guaranteed to be wearing green and gold next year?

There is a reason why he has remained on Beane’s upside ( although it appears lost to many on this site). Ultimately, Crosby is not the difference in this team being good or bad next year. You may argue well, not b/w good and bad but maybe b/w good and mediocre. To that end it may be true. The question still remains, who will be an acceptable upgrade?

"I've been accused of using too many words...I suppose that's like accusing Mozart of using too many notes." Bill King

by Gerard on Nov 12, 2008 11:31 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Cesar Izturis was a better player last year

If Cesar Izturis makes you look bad, virtually anyone would be an improvement.

There are plenty of no-offense players out there who are actually good, as opposed to merely average, defensively— Adam Everett, Jason Bartlett, Jack Wilson, John McDonald, the list goes on. Hell, you could even include Omar Vizquel, though his offense last year was so appalling that he’s almost certainly not better than Crosby.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 12, 2008 12:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If we have to go with Vizquel...

ugggh…we might as well wear black and orange and pretend it’s Halloween for 6 months out of the year. You lost me on that one.

"I've been accused of using too many words...I suppose that's like accusing Mozart of using too many notes." Bill King

by Gerard on Nov 12, 2008 3:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Huh... I thought THIS was the Reverse Crosby

Quoth schmifty, May 11 2008 in-game thread:

What’s up with the weird facial hair?
Looks like a reverse-Crosby or a Swish Lite.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 11:39 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

You're block-quothing yourself?

If I don't comment on your comment how will you know you are completely wrong? -Rocktopus

by pam5981 on Nov 12, 2008 11:42 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Upon further review...

That was my first comment ever on AN. Aww. No wonder I remember it…. one of those precious moments.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 12:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I was always told

I’d go blind if I block-quoted myself.

Or it would fall off.

"You know, a long time ago being crazy meant something. Nowadays everybody's crazy."

-Charles Manson

by kaweahkaweah on Nov 12, 2008 12:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No, try it. Don't be scared.

I'm here to talk about the past.

by 67MARQUEZ on Nov 12, 2008 1:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I was always told
I’d go blind if I block-quoted myself.

Or it would fall off.

Well whaddyknow, all these years they’ve been lying to me.

"You know, a long time ago being crazy meant something. Nowadays everybody's crazy."

-Charles Manson

by kaweahkaweah on Nov 12, 2008 1:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Lol

Great comment.

www.punditpolitics.com - Political IQ Tests, Pundit Blog, News and Opinion.

by ChadGod on Nov 12, 2008 1:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Lol.

Rich’s facial hair/ferret experiment was definitely a mistake.

by whiteshoes40 on Nov 12, 2008 12:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Very much so!

I thought he was shaving out the portion under his lip on purpose (odd), but after researching photos where he has a full face of stubble grown in, I’ve determined that spot is just naturally hairless.

Okay, that sounded weird.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 12:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not a big jersey fan,

but I have to say: I do want one of those. That’s too funny.

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Nov 12, 2008 4:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox

by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 13, 2008 10:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

BP

james (BK): Were the A’s incredibly fortunate to include Gonzalez instead of Anderson in the Holliday deal? Anderson was reportedly in the discussion.

Kevin Goldstein: Don’t believe everything you read. This was a great trade for Oakland, and I’m not one of those people who tries to twist every move Beane makes into some kind of stroke of genius, because he does make some clunkers once in a while. That said, he traded away a toolsy guy who still has a disturbing gap between those tools and skills, a reliever who is WAY overvalued because he has numbers in his save column despite not having closer stuff, and a starter who is frankly a bit of a fraud. I’ll bet anyone that Smith’s ‘08 ERA will end up being his career high. The A’s get Holliday and compete and get two draft picks, or try to flip it for more this summer.

by Asfan4ever723 on Nov 12, 2008 12:24 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Hmm.

I feel like Huston is not “WAY overvalued” at the moment, but pretty much completely the opposite. Maybe it’s because I see everything through my jaded AN glasses, and because the majority of people here are very vocal about being sick of Huston, but it certainly seems to me that Huston’s trade value went wayyy down during the second half of this season. And he didn’t really have “numbers in his save column” this year, either. Gah. I guess I’ll take Kevin Goldstein’s advice and turn it against him: “Don’t believe everything you read.”

by whiteshoes40 on Nov 12, 2008 12:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's too dumb. Something must be up.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 12, 2008 4:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'll take that bet

2008 will be his career HIGH ERA, huh?

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Nov 12, 2008 2:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's pretty obvious that he's meaning career high

from the standpoint of 2008 being Smith’s best year.

ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524

by rfloh on Nov 12, 2008 4:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's pretty obvious that vignette17 is making a joke based on the author's unfortunate choice of wording.

I remember a sign at the third hole of my local executive golf course:

Bob Jones Attorneys: Where service is always over par.

There’s no winning with “par”. You’re screwed no matter how you use it.

au contra ire

by JediLeroy on Nov 12, 2008 4:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Joe Sheehan likes the trade for the A's, and not so much for the Rox

linky

Basically, he says that the three players the A’s gave up are of the caliber of player that would normally be traded by a non-contender at the deadline, not in the middle of November.

"However, at Elias, I think they keep track of the amount of sunflower seeds spit in a dugout each night." - Brad Ziegler, 8/7/08

by doctorK on Nov 12, 2008 1:11 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

there are known knowns, and known unknowns ...
Street is a known quantity, a sidearming right-hander

Sidearming?

Did you overpay for those eggs? @('.')@

by monkeyball on Nov 12, 2008 1:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

well, to be overly fair ...

… maybe the few times he ever actually watched Street were when Street was dealing with his (allegedly, only groin) injury and was dropping his arm slot (and pitching poorly as a result).

It was pretty clear to me all season that Street would periodically lose his arm slot and drop to somewhere just south of 3/4, resulting in sliders without much movement. Whether (and how) this was due to his lingering groin injury, I don’t know. (Personally, I suspect some other lingering physical issue somewhere significantly north of his groin.)

Did you overpay for those eggs? @('.')@

by monkeyball on Nov 12, 2008 2:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm more down on Street than most staty A's fans here,

but Sheehan and Goldstein are underrating him quite a bit.

The A's colors are green and gold.

by mikeA on Nov 12, 2008 1:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I doubt Gonzalez would be traded by a non-contender at the deadline.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 12, 2008 4:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I like this conclusion:
If you look at it solely as a trade for one year of Holliday, it’s a win for them. They won’t miss anything they gave up, and Holliday’s impact on their offense will be considerable.

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Nov 12, 2008 4:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Two words:

Carlos Peña.

Billy must not like young, projectable, toolsy guys named Carlos.

by noava22 on Nov 12, 2008 1:32 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Seriously. Carlos Pena is a horrible example.

It took him how long to realize his potential again?

This.

by Blicks on Nov 12, 2008 1:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

well

he put it together in 2007, his age 29 season, but he had a decent 2004. Then he bounced around from the Tigers to the Yankees and the Red Sox (really? I don’t remember either of those) and then finally to the D-Rays.

http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/P/carlos-pena.shtml

by noava22 on Nov 12, 2008 1:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He was siigned

 to a MINOR LEAGUE deal by the DRays, at the end of 2006, after both the Yanks and RS dumped him.

Any team could have had him after 2006.

ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524

by rfloh on Nov 12, 2008 1:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I thought Pena was a pretty good comp for Gonzalez as far as his A's career went.

Central figure in a trade to acquire him. Traded soon thereafter after apparently not showing enough to satisfy the A’s.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 12, 2008 4:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Carlos Pena was not toolsy.

Children, until we have taught them better, will be perfectly happy with a seasonal round of games in which conkers succeeds hopscotch.

by salb918 on Nov 12, 2008 4:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The term "tools" annoys me

Reminds me of a third-grade girl with brand-new, top-of-the-line Craftman wrenches showing up to fix your plumbing. The tools aren’t as important as the person utilizing them.

"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox

by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 13, 2008 10:45 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Carlos Febles worked out great

That wasn’t Billy, but whatever

"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox

by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 13, 2008 10:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Rockies coming Oakland June 26-28...

should be interesting, depending on which of Smith/Carlos/Huston are still on the Rockies at that time.

by whiteshoes40 on Nov 12, 2008 1:52 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Greg Smith will pitch a no-hitter.

It will be the only shutout of the season, and one of three quality starts, for him.

This.

by Blicks on Nov 12, 2008 1:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, but he'll have 8 pickoffs.

He’ll only get 19 batters out.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 12, 2008 4:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Holliday in action from last July 4, from real far away

As recapped in these threads: here and here

Coors field cheering the first of two Holliday bombs (I think this one went out to right center near the bullpens).

OH NOES, HE STRICKSOUT TOO MUCH

Holliday’s second bomb that night was a slam. BTW, PurpleRow voted this game as their game of the year (as it should’ve been).

"However, at Elias, I think they keep track of the amount of sunflower seeds spit in a dugout each night." - Brad Ziegler, 8/7/08

by doctorK on Nov 12, 2008 1:59 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

The Marlins

That was, by far, the most entertaining baseball game (non-A’s category) I’ve ever seen.

"However, at Elias, I think they keep track of the amount of sunflower seeds spit in a dugout each night." - Brad Ziegler, 8/7/08

by doctorK on Nov 12, 2008 2:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting tidbit:

Link

The article mentions that 75% of Rockies’ fans polled felt that they did not get enough in return for Holliday. While I would be interested in seeing the parameters of the survey and see if the numbers are reliable, I was a little surprised to see this. On our side of the trade, I’ve seen lamentations of losing Gonzalez and I’ve seen acknowledgments that the A’s had to give up something good to bag a guy like Holliday, but I have not seen anybody suggesting Billy fleeced O’Dowd. And you’d figure we’d be the ones first and foremost to make such a claim…

Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.

by Joey C. on Nov 12, 2008 3:29 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I wonder what they would have considered "enough" for Holliday.

I doubt we would have been satisfied with whatever we could get for Jason Giambi after 2000 either.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 12, 2008 4:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No, we wouldn't be the first ones to say so.

Whenever there’s a trade, on aggregate, fans on both sides will complain that their side came out worse. That’s because it’s natural for all fans to overvalue what they already have.

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Nov 12, 2008 4:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If only 75% of a team's fans think that they didn't get enough for a player,

the odds are rather good that the team in fact got too much for that player.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 12, 2008 5:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Then the verdict is in

Both teams overpaid and got too much for their players.

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Nov 12, 2008 7:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, isn't it interesting that 75% of Rockies fans are feeling "NO"

and 75% of A’s fans are feeling “YES” on this trade, as voted above? Makes sense to me…

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 5:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think that speaks to an immediate reaction by both fanbases rather than a rational one

I took that more as a function of ANers saying “we won’t suck as bad next year!” rather than any sentiment that the trade truly favors the A’s. Similarly, I see the Rockies fans uttering a collective disgusted “aw, shit” at not having a masher in LF in the very near future, rather than any objective outlook on how this trade helps them in the long run.

Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.

by Joey C. on Nov 12, 2008 5:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This Holliday trade is so clearly an attempt to lure Langerhans back

through some weird three-way trade scenario that I’m surprised to be the only one to realize it.

"I'm disappointed Ziggy didn't pump his fist towards the sky 100 times and scream like a hooker." ~Nico.

by LAXile on Nov 12, 2008 4:23 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Langerhans is a minor league free agent

If the A’s want him, they got him.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 12, 2008 5:19 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

*********HOLLIDAY WILL BE ON KNBR IN 5 MINUTES********

"I know they're the defending World Champs, but they are the whiniest team in baseball" -Rays announcers

by baseballgirl on Nov 12, 2008 4:23 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Nothing important.

Oh, and Ralph Barbieri is an absolute douche.

by mikev on Nov 12, 2008 5:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If he said that, I'd call it amusing if not important

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 12, 2008 5:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Chaaam-pion-ship!

by Rocktopus on Nov 12, 2008 6:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}

by micdog2001 on Nov 12, 2008 10:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yung Chi claimed

Yung Chi claimed off waivers from Seattle, what a deal

Morada Mudshark

by Morada Mudshark on Nov 12, 2008 4:35 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

what would you offer for swisher?

he’s not cheap 3/20mill…last yr of deal option at 10mill

Is there more in the works? Oakland has legit interest in Rafael Furcal, which would be an offensive upgrade at SS if the A’s could sign him. And another free agent bat (Jason Giambi?) or bringing back the very available Nick Swisher could beef up the lineup even more.

Suddenly, with one move, this is a team talking about for the short term, not just 2011. They’re interesting again.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/…;entry_id=32570

by Asfan4ever723 on Nov 12, 2008 4:37 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Sweeney and Braden

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 12, 2008 5:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The link was too long, and didn't work

It seems this site continually cuts off long URLs. Maybe we should start putting links in “TinyURL” format…

"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox

by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 13, 2008 10:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's not the length of the URL

It’s the “=” character. AN software chokes on that character in a URL, and every SFGate article URL has one.

You don’t need to use TinyURL, though. Just use the link button instead of pasting the URL directly into the text.

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Nov 15, 2008 10:06 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

FUCK FUCK FUCK (mildly OT)

Angels might be done with K-Rod. Like, Arte Moreno said it kind of done.

"Believe it or not, we really spent a lot of time and effort trying to re-sign Frankie. In fact, I think there were six different offers on the table, at different times. At about this time last year, we thought we had him signed. Rivera got the three-year, $45-million deal from the Yankees. I was at the owners’ meetings in Florida last year where Tony felt that we had him signed. We had an agreement and he didn’t sign it.

“I think as a whole, we’re probably turning the page on this one. I think that we as an organization made this decision. And I’m not one of these ‘never, never’ people. I’m saying, I think as a whole, it’s important to turn the page and move forward, and get prepared to do some of the other things we want to do.”

source

Butbutbutbutbut he’s gonna blow more saves next year, and K-Rod being resigned means less chance of slegnA keeping Teixeira/extending Fugly Lackey beyond 2009/getting CC/some other kind of offensive threat to the A’s. Not cool.

Well, schmifty, enjoy him on your Mets (aka hope that the new Phillies FO fucks the team up, which they are perfectly capable of doing). Or Brian Sabean signs him lolololol.

This.

by Blicks on Nov 12, 2008 4:49 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

But I don't waaant K-Rod!!!

NOOOO!
No way K-Rod will be as fun as Billy. I like chattery closers who will make fun of me.
Also, I just can’t root for a douche like K-Rod.
PS you posted this before Metsblog did – points to you. Then again, Metsblog seems all sure that the Mets will not sign K-Rod, so maybe they’re stepping back on covering him.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 4:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It was on a few sites already.

Maybe Metsblog is smart and realizes that K-Rod is a stupid signing, so they’re not pimping it as much.

Someone will sign K-Rod to a fat contract (at least 4 years). All this is posturization.

I still say Angels or Mets. Although I could now see the Giants and Dodgers entering the bidding.

In the meanwhile, as relief for your Mets, Ryan Howard will be traded. Some grizzly FA vet will be brought in.

This.

by Blicks on Nov 12, 2008 5:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Today Metsblog had the fans vote on who they'd like to be the next closer

(regardless of trades, money, years, etc.)
It came out to K-Rod 59, Jenks 20, Fuentes 14, Jenks 3, Street 3% (ouch, Huston).

But everyone is very wary of K-Rod’s desire for 4 years, as well as his desire for grocery bags full of money – we know we have way too many other spots that also need that money. I think if you factor in those concerns, the people who want K-Rod drops by a lot. I really hope we don’t end up with K-Rod.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 5:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And all my percent signs disappeared

except for the one next to Street. So for the record, those numbers are all percents – not numbers of people! 3,486 people voted, actually.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 5:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Haha. Fuentes is a better pitcher than K-Rod, and if he's on a 3 year deal, age shouldn't be an issue.

Since I’m sick and that translates to way too much unproductive time spent in bed and on the internets (too braindead to study/go to class, too stuffy to sleep, bleh), I found this rather entertaining article

12 Steps to Mets Recovery

Who do you think the Mets pick up for SP, RP, LF, and 2B?

This.

by Blicks on Nov 12, 2008 5:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Why do you think Fuentes is better than Rodriguez?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 12, 2008 5:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe not career-wise, but he was a better pitcher this year.

Fuentes: 1.97 tRA, 156 tRA+, 2.24 FIP

K-Rod: 3.59 tRA, 120 tRA+ , 3.22 FIP

Fuentes is not a better pitcher throughout his career, but he was the better pitcher this year.

This.

by Blicks on Nov 12, 2008 6:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Haha, very nice

I don’t read Bleacher Report typically, but I have to agree with most of that list. Although, I can’t figure out why the guy keeps saying “City” Field (it’s "Citi"). Also sort of strange that he puts F-Mart on the ‘Untouchables’ list, and then proposes that we trade F-Mart. Anyways…

2b – I think almost all of us are hoping to sign O-Dawg. He would be perfect in NY. He’s always trying to hog the camera during the Eric Byrnes Show; you can tell he wishes the show were about him. The Mets just got their own channel and are still developing new programs – they would give Hudson his own show in a heartbeat. I think there are actual baseball-related reasons for signing him, too.

LF – We just have to put Daniel Murphy in there somewheres, so LF it is. Will have some defensive trouble, but we just need that bat in the lineup; I am not comfortable with trading him. I used to hear whispers about Byrnesy for LF, and he sure did love NY in the Byrnes Show episode filmed in the city, but it seems the idea has died out.

SP – A tough situation. The 12 Steps’ proposal leaves Mike Pelfrey as our #2 pitcher, and while I have confirmed to Pelf’s face that I am his biggest fan, having him as our #2 sounds really scary to me. (I am totally feeling bad for John Maine right now, who has so quickly been eclipsed by his own friend Pelf in terms of public perception of goodness). However, I wish GOOD RIDDANCE to Ollie Perez, whose stats show he is not even nearly worth the $ Boras is asking for. DLowe is too much of a douche, I don’t want him. We’ve got Niese, but he doesn’t seem ready. Alright, that leaves us with 2 open spots that I really don’t know how to fill.

RP – The consensus seems to be that, when you factor in contracts and so forth, Fuentes is our closer of choice. Unfortunately, Kunz (our formerly brilliant closer prospect) is looking like a total bust these days. Wouldn’t it have been nice to just grow a new closer from within? No such luck. I agree with the Bleacher Report that Duaner Sanchez, Scott Schoeneweis, Pedro Feliciano, and especially Aaron Heilman need to GO. Even though Joe Smith is kind of a jerk, he has done well enough to stay, I’ll admit. Parnell might indeed be good enough to make the bullpen by then, too. Whatever trades we have to do to fill up all the holes in our bullpen are fine by me – I’m ready to part with any prospect except Daniel Murphy and Brad Holt.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 6:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You fill the 2 open spots

by accepting that replacing Luis Castillo with Hudson is not a priority, no matter how you feel personally about Castillo.

You fill the 2 open spots by going after the good FA pitchers like Sabathia, and yes, Lowe the douche.

The reason John “I try not to tell the trainers about pain, until it gets too bad” Maine has been eclipsed is because he’s an idiot.

Why would you want Byrnes in LF? Murphy, Tatis, Evans in some kind of timesharing arrangement is better and cheaper. Or if you want to spend, Adam Dunn, who can be moved in a year’s time to 1b, when Delgado leaves.

Kunz was a brilliant closer prospect? Really? When? Who considered him a brilliant closer prospect? And if the Mets are relying are Parnell, they’re are so very screwed. Kunz and Parnell suck.

ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524

by rfloh on Nov 12, 2008 11:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, also -

Apparently catcher is now an issue for us, too. Yes, yes, let’s have one more problem. I don’t understand; Schneider has performed exactly as advertised (except that he’s been kind of crap on defense. Okay, that’s a huge exception). Everyone was excited about him when we signed him, his offense was exactly what we expected, and now we can’t wait to get rid of him? Oy. Nevertheless, Omar’s announced that replacing the catcher is a top priority. I guess I could deal with it being some oldster like Bengie Molina, whose name has been thrown around a lot. We have more than enough ancientness already, but as long as we lose some of the dead weight like Castillo, I could deal.

by schmifty on Nov 12, 2008 6:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Who were these people who were excited about Schneider?

The problem with losing “dead weight” like Castillo, is that you need to replace him. If you spend money replacing him, you have less money to get players to deal with the Mets’ other needs.

ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524

by rfloh on Nov 12, 2008 11:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And Fuentes won't want money?

Jenks would cost prospects. Including very very likely Daniel Murphy.

ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524

by rfloh on Nov 12, 2008 10:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I like when my milk is posturized

Children, until we have taught them better, will be perfectly happy with a seasonal round of games in which conkers succeeds hopscotch.

by salb918 on Nov 12, 2008 5:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't. I want my cream to rise to the top.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 12, 2008 5:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Since I have no image skills,

please imagine that I just photoshopped an image of Dwight Howard dunking over a cow.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 12, 2008 6:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Imagine reality.

The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.

by rebus on Nov 12, 2008 7:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not bad

Please imagine Jessica Alba dunking over me in an A’s cap

I'm here to talk about the past.

by 67MARQUEZ on Nov 12, 2008 9:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Too improbable to render.

Sorry.

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Nov 12, 2008 11:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So did she get into Oracle

through an underground tunnel or something? Or is she just not curious enough to ask “what’s that big building next door with no roof on it?”

"Camelot sure fell apart, didn't it?"-Steve McCatty

by 5Aces on Nov 13, 2008 10:52 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well since you put it that way.

I’d vote for the second one.

I'm here to talk about the past.

by 67MARQUEZ on Nov 13, 2008 12:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The Mets need good relievers

It’s not “smart” to ignore an option, not before you know the cost. Not wanting KRod without knowing the cost, is not “smart”.

ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524

by rfloh on Nov 12, 2008 10:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Probably pointless

since they’ll probably post a link to the interview online, but here are my notes from the Holliday-on-KNBR interview:

R Barbieri:
“He’s not going to be playing in front of huge crowds”
“He’s about the only guy you’d go there to see”

T:
I don’t know if you have a marquee player, how many people will go out to see him if the team is not good
Most cities would sell more tickets with a good team minus a marquee player

RB:
How many butts did Bonds put in the seats?

T:
Quite a few, but they had a good team for a while there.

T:
Holliday is not Bonds, not Manny, doesn’t have the dreads, doesn’t do the quirky stuff, solid guy, bat .300, 25-35 HR….I’d like to see them sign him. Look how many young guys they got, can keep costs down.
It’s not often you get a legitimate MVP type hitter in the middle of the lineup; if you can get that guy you have to keep that guy

(MH comes on)
(talk about Stillwater, OK state, NC state, his dad)

RB:
Just got off the phone with Beane; we’re hoping you become a Giant
MH:
One team at a time…trying to get used to the idea of moving again, convincing kids that they have to wear their A’s hats
RB:
Did you have to approve it
MH:
No, I’m a 5 year player, I have no rights, I had no say, not that I would’ve said either way
T:
Surprised?
MH: Expecting trade, a little suprised by the A’s, typically don’t trade for players who make as much as I…excited, A’s history, McGwire is a favorite
T:
Affect mindset, going to a team…don’t know if they’ll re-sign you or negotiate, how does that affect mindset?
MH:
Being a competitive athlete, doing best I can, being competitive, I keep it simple, wife/2 kids very important, go out, do my best, come home, do my best, don’t think that far in the future. In SoCal, training for next season, hope to put together a great season.
RB:
Must’ve been an incredible year 2007, Rockies exciting, 21 game winning streak (?)
MH:
Yes, it was exciting, till WS, in Rockies organization through minors, great to make that kind of run with some of your best friends
T:
Are you still positive you touched home plate against the Padres?
MH:
Doesn’t matter; McClelland thought I did
T:
Looked woozy
MH:
(walks through play, claims less-than-optimal technique)

RB:
Humidor — accuses Rockies of cheating with baseballs
MH:
Jokes about pushing for separate bags of balls
Says Coors plays pretty fair; he’s sick of hearing about the Coors Effect
Didn’t play pre-Humidor so doesn’t know about that but is excited to get a chance to prove that he hits well elsewhere
T:
Says they play “semi-normal” games there now, legitimizes the park, uses MVP candidacy as evidence that park is considered legitimate
MH:
Good point, says Coors is down the list a ways in terms of home runs, #5 or so, says Rockies hitters should get more credit
There are a handful of parks that are much better to hit HRs in
Any team has better home stats – cites familiarity
RB:
Good friends with McGwire; he’s a recluse, a victim of his own congressional experience, would he be better off if he just admitted he did steroids?
MH:
Never talked to him about it, can’t speak for him, he’s a grown man, great person, he’s been a good friend to me, tons of hitting advice, he loves what he’s doing, family man, playing lots of golf, he’s not upset or disliking his life.
RB:
We admire your game, saw you in the AS game, you’ll be an asset, A’s are lucky to have you, keep in touch.

RB/T: (jealousy talk wrt Giants gonna get nothing, A’s got Holliday)

"God doesn't pay attention to your cute little hypotheticals." -- Jeff from LL

by oblique on Nov 12, 2008 4:54 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Nice liveblogging!

So I guess all Holliday has to do is get some hair extensions, and we’re golden…

by Englishmajor on Nov 12, 2008 5:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

TY O!

I missed the interview and appreciate your notes.

by IM4Oakgal on Nov 12, 2008 5:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Great work

Loved having the 2 minute read instead of the 10 minute talk

by GoA's on Nov 12, 2008 5:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

As far as Holliday goes...

I just hope that they get him more protection in the lineup besides Cust. It’s so frustrating to wait 3 innings for the MAN to come up and then they feed him changeups in the dirt.

by IM4Oakgal on Nov 12, 2008 5:21 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

at first

i thought it was Gio Gonzalez and i was estatic then i heard on here it was Cargo and i was sad but still i like it as long as we resighn him

by robbo650 on Nov 12, 2008 5:40 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Unless the A's

are planning to play half their games at Coors Field, I absolutely HATE this trade.

by Connecticut Jim on Nov 12, 2008 6:37 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Crosby has always been one of my favorite players, but he is nothing more than average and most likely won’t get any better. Hopefully one of our specs will step up this year at that position…

[img]http://www.sportzin.com/forums/uploads/U10266-1226358158.jpg[/img]

by HovaInsomnia on Nov 12, 2008 6:41 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms
Start posting about the Athletics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Imgp0089_editedagasin_small
DLD 11/24/09 - Fine, I'll make another video game dump
Me_at_att_park_small
Greener Grass, Episode 7: Transportation Proclamation
Me_at_att_park_small
Old McPherson is an A, e yi e yi yoooooooo
Depaulbluedemons_small
Community Prospect List #18
413niegoftl__sl500_aa280__small
A's Protect Carter, FDLS, Figueroa and Souza from Rule V

Recent FanPosts

Small
The A's Move to Oakland in 1968
Funny-pictures12_small
If Jack Cust Traded, Then To Whom And For What?
Small
Jack Cust Drawing Trade Interest?
Countdown_small
Some things I am "coming around" on...
Bill_king_small
On Trading Catchers....

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Tyler_at_maya_school_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

As_kings_cal_small louismg

Editors

Countdown_small Taj Adib

Ziegler160px_small Flashfire

527918550406_0_bg_small notsellingjeans