The Matt Holliday Deal and Its Ramifications
by Tyler Bleszinski on Nov 10, 2008 2:28 PM PST
808 comments
So the A's have acquired a big bat in the Rockies Matt Holliday. And he's right-handed. And he's young. The A's haven't acquired someone like this since they landed Jermaine Dye and they had Giambi and Dye powering them towards what looked like a powerhouse team for years to come. Well because of the freak accident that broke Dye's leg in the playoffs, the Dye acquisition didn't work.
The details are still a little fuzzy, but it looks like the deal is for Greg Smith for sure and probably Carlos Gonzalez and Huston Street. If this is the final deal, I would honestly say that both Smith and Street are pretty expendable in this current A's roster alignment. Smith, otherwise known as "Nibbles" around AN since about June last year for his penchant for not challenging hitters, should be relatively easily replaced by someone like Brett Anderson or even Josh Outman. Street, who seemed to find himself a bit towards the very end of the year, will be replaced by Joey Devine. And let's face it, Beane has always considered closers expendable commodities. Street wasn't even the A's closer by the end of the year, so who thinks that this is a big loss for the A's? I don't.
The one big chip the A's gave up, if the rumors are true, was Carlos Gonzalez. C-Gon didn't have a great year. He had flashes of brilliance for Oakland and you could see that he had all the tools and talent, but the A's don't prize players like that. They want their players to have the plate discipline. So perhaps it was a situation where Beane felt that perhaps C-Gon is going to be a star, but just probably not the right star in the right situation.
The question remains on Holliday. Do the A's try and re-sign him long-term? I'm betting that the answer on that one is probably no. I'd love to see the A's do it because they'd have a long-term nagging need finally resolved in Holliday (that being a big stick from the right-side). But I'm just not sure that Boras and the A's would be able to come to a deal. I mean, we're talking Billy Beane and Scott Boras here. Course they could probably charge admission to the cage match on pay-per-view if Beane did decide to at least try to negotiate.
The A's get a guy who was runner-up for MVP of the National League in 2007 (I've heard quite a few arguments that he deserved it, not Rollins, but I'll leave that for salb and grover to decide). He is probably dreaming about dollar signs heading into the year, so you just have to know that he is going to come to camp ready to perform. Say what you want about professional athletes, but I truly don't think anything motivates them like the promise of a big pay day. So you're going to see a motivated guy performing in green and gold. There was quite a bit of discussion in some of the other threads earlier about whether or not the A's would try to move Holliday at the trade deadline, and I tend to think you will see them try to move him if the A's don't seem to be contending for whatever reason (the young pitching doesn't perform as expected or, as has been the last couple of seasons, the injuries pile up early). I mean there aren't that many hitters like Holliday that a contender can plug right into the third or fourth spot in a lineup and he fits perfectly. So the A's did acquire a very nice trading chip if the steel cage match between Beane and Boras never comes to fruition. The other thing is that the A's could also just let him walk at the end of the year and take two very nice draft picks as compensation. We know Beane loves to stockpile draft picks.
In the meantime, the A's offense just got upgraded. Holliday will be a nice shot in the arm for the A's stagnant bats. If anything, at least you finally get a "hitter". The A's haven't had very many of those.
The other thing it does do, I believe, is send a clear message to A's fans that the A's are going to try to compete in 2009. You don't acquire a guy of Holliday's caliber with one year left on his contract to wallow in the basement of the AL West. I also think we could see the A's also sign someone like Furcal as well to try and drastically reduce the pressure on the A's young staff. You add someone like Furcal to the A's lineup and suddenly you have a lineup that looks like this:
Furcal
Sweeney
Holliday
Cust
Chavez (if healthy)
Suzuki
Buck/Cunningham
Ellis
Barton
Now that is not going to set the world on fire, but it does certainly look like it could put it its share of runs. Or I might even bat Cust in front of Holliday because of Cust's ability to get on base. Maybe Cust even sees some better pitches to hit as well because of it?
I love the trade. Gonzalez might turn into the second coming of Carlos Beltran, but the A's could not go through another 162-game season with that offense. It just wasn't going to work. I'm expecting more moves towards the A's being competitive in 2009 on the heels of this, whether that means Furcal or Dunn or someone else, I'm not sure, but I don't think the A's are done. They're sending a message that they think they can be competitive sooner rather than later, otherwise, why do the deal in the first place unless you don't really think that Gonzalez is all he was supposed to be?
For once it's nice to have our team doing the acquiring, isn't it?
0 recs |
808 comments
|
Email
Print
Comments
Forst!
"Not in your wildest alcoholic nightmare would you ever imagine such events unfolding!" Bill King
by Buck Turgidson on Nov 10, 2008 2:34 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
lol
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 10, 2008 6:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This is the War -Room, for Chrissakes!
Who let this guy in here?
"Not in your wildest alcoholic nightmare would you ever imagine such events unfolding!" Bill King
by Buck Turgidson on Nov 10, 2008 6:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Holy Fucking Shitucky!
Matt Frickin Holliday! It’s a beautiful day in the neighborhood, folks!
My Giants friends are all cursing at me as we speak!
Go Billy Beane and Go A’s!
by mrod on Nov 10, 2008 6:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They should be thanking you
For taking him out of the division
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Nov 10, 2008 7:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Is your name some Turd Ferguson/Buck Futter hybrid?
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 6:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Fut the wuck do you mean?
“These are not the droids you’re looking for”.
by mrod on Nov 10, 2008 6:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
For once, I'm going to think about the now
It gets exhausting as an A’s fan to always be thinking of the future. What if, what if, what if. For once I’m going to just be happy and treat Holliday as my most awesome, big ass birthday present ever!
"Don't be an ass!" --Bill King
by batgirl on Nov 10, 2008 2:37 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Happy Holliday!
..Birthday, that is
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 5:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Happy Birthday!
Did you ask for a right-handed stick to fill out the A’s lineup when you blew out your candles?
by Tyler Bleszinski on Nov 10, 2008 6:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Happy Birthday to you!
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 7:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Gah... I don't like this at all at first blush
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Nov 10, 2008 2:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Seems like a target of opportunity for BB
To me Street and Smith are totally expendable. Cargon is worth it for player like Holliday.
"Not in your wildest alcoholic nightmare would you ever imagine such events unfolding!" Bill King
by Buck Turgidson on Nov 10, 2008 2:41 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I absolutely love it.
Smith is the definition of expendable. Unless he learns how to control his fringe stuff, he’s looking at 5 ERAs for a long time. Him in Coors could get ugly.
Street’s nice, but I think Devine is better.
Cargon is the wild card of course, he could be absolutely nothing or could turn into .320/.370/.540 or something crazy. I think he’s going to be one extreme or the other.
by Emmett89 on Nov 10, 2008 2:43 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Well, time to refer back to my rosterbate post the other day...
I had the A’s picking up Holliday, Swisher, Furcal, And Giambi.
I really really don’t like this signing if we don’t add Giambi +
However, I think we will be adding Giambi, at least, very soon. Our lineup is going to be siiiiiiick!!! We have been waiting around for a good lineup for like 5 years now.
Also, props to Beane for giving up 3 over-rated players and holding onto Duke, whom the Rockies were reportedly interested in. This definitely helps us in ’09.
www.punditpolitics.com - Political IQ Tests, Pundit Blog, News and Opinion.
by ChadGod on Nov 10, 2008 2:44 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Sigh
I’ll say it again. Giambi is an older, more expense, worse hitting Jack Cust that we’d have to allow play 1B.
No thank you. Much better to sign Furcal, Blake, or anyone besides Giambi (unless Giambi does a $1M incentives-deal)
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 2:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Anyone decent will be more expensive than Cust, and most won't hit as well.
Most importantly, we’re talking about a huge upgrade from Barton.
Furcal/Giambi/Holliday = playoffs
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Nov 10, 2008 2:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not so convinced
Not many 38-40 year olds still hit >30 HR. The cliff is coming for Giambi, the only question is whether he’s already fallen off of it.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 2:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He seemed effective last season. I think he'll be okay if he's healthy enough for ~130 games.
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Nov 10, 2008 3:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Really?...
After Giambi all we need is John Jaha and we have the good ‘ol Homerin’ A’s.
They forgot that whole mantra about defense tho…
The Stockton Ports pitching staff is better than the Orioles.
by gdub171 on Nov 10, 2008 4:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
what about genronimo berroa?
"I was right and you were wrong." - Ray Fosse
by kbtoyz on Nov 10, 2008 4:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And Saenz off the bench
"God doesn't pay attention to your cute little hypotheticals." -- Jeff from LL
by oblique on Nov 10, 2008 4:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
People who think Cust is an irrefutably better offensive player than Giambi...
= Lay off the Kool-Aid Bro.
www.punditpolitics.com - Political IQ Tests, Pundit Blog, News and Opinion.
by ChadGod on Nov 10, 2008 7:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Who said "irrefutably". Just most probably.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 8:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How about this:
By any rational system of measurement, Cust has been an irrefutably better hitter than Giambi for the last two years.
by MrIncognito on Nov 10, 2008 8:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Strickouts1!!111!!!! are rational
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Nov 10, 2008 8:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yicks! You're all a bunch of crazy fukes
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 8:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Blake is useless
Average bat, waaaaay below average glove. The A’s could do a whole lot better than him, unless they want a place-holder for a year or so.
by jsullivan on Nov 10, 2008 5:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
i don’t understand all the casey blake love around here. it’s not like he’s 28
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 10, 2008 6:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes but neither are we anymore
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 7:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
fair enough
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 10, 2008 7:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A whole lot better? Whom?
The point in getting a guy like Blake is precisely because he would be a placeholder, and shouldn’t cost much, thus allowing the acquisition of other people like Furcal.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on Nov 10, 2008 10:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I have mixed feelings about this trade. I like it for next year, and losing Street and Smith
doesn’t bother me that much. CarGon doesn’t bother that much either because you have to give up someone like him to get Holliday. however, I’m not a big fan of one year rentals especially when Scott Boras is involved.
by Erin6 on Nov 10, 2008 2:44 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
ok is it just me or are you guys
expecting either a few more moving parts either way or at least one more body on either side?
3 for 1 deals just don’t seem like BB style. I would figure that it would be more likely of a 4-2 deal with Oak including one more closer to the MLB ready average type and Clo including a far off high risk high reward type.
Just something that BB can throw in as a potential high return bonus on this whole thing
by laxtonto on Nov 10, 2008 2:44 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
BBeane's style
If you acquire a penchant for a certain style, it’s time to change styles…IMO.
Officially awaiting the 2009 season.
by One won lost won on Nov 10, 2008 2:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
it just seems like this deal
doesn’t seem right…
I don’t know, I haven’t really put my finger on it, but it seems off…
by laxtonto on Nov 10, 2008 2:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
perhaps more will unfold
it was written that Colorado will flip Street, and perhaps something coming the A’s way as part of that.
Officially awaiting the 2009 season.
by One won lost won on Nov 10, 2008 2:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
so colorado trades street eventually, and just decides to send the a’s something as part of it? i’ll bet against that happening.
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 10, 2008 10:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm approbative!
I just hope Holiday likes the West Coast and sparse crowds.
Officially awaiting the 2009 season.
by One won lost won on Nov 10, 2008 2:45 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think he was used to it until the Rockies huge run end of last year.
by drmmerchk on Nov 11, 2008 11:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
CarGon has all kinds of potential
but this deal signals that Beane thinks the A’s can contend in 2009. I think it also signals that he’s far from done this offseason, since Holliday alone doesn’t say “contender” in my opinion.
by OaklandSi on Nov 10, 2008 2:45 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
and Holliday doesn’t make much sense acquiring him and doing nothing else. That’s why you have to assume that the A’s sign a free agent bat or two.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Nov 10, 2008 2:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
i’m really feeling a giambi signing. my neighbor who works in the clubhouse insists giambi is on the way, word is that giambi and beane have been on the phone together all week.
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 10, 2008 6:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I know Beane shot down the Alejo-Giambi connection, but..
A’s sign Gallego, trade for Matt Holliday.
A’s sign Alejo…
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 6:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, Giambi's coming
It’ll make it easy for me to rationalize my ambivalence about success… because I f***ing hate Giambi as a person. Worst douchebag in baseball, bar none.
God, I wish Daric Barton had actually been competent this year.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 8:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How dare you
..forget Selig in a discussion of baseball douchebaggery
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 8:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ya Jason's got some serious competition for that title.
I’d put any anti-competitive owner near the top of the list — Pohlad, Loria, McClatchey. Then you have Elijah Dukes and Barry Bonds, who may or may not actually be in baseball.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 8:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
AJ Pierzienskieirieirieirier
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 8:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Clemens. Ozzie Guillen. Jose Canseco. Jeff Kent. dor-K.
Did you overpay for those eggs? @('.')@
by monkeyball on Nov 10, 2008 8:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What did Ozzie Guillen ever do to you?
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 8:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
K-Rod doesn't belong on this list
Aside from playing for a rival team and celebrating more visibly than you care to watch when your team just lost, what has Rodriguez ever done to warrant the label of “douchebag”?
You may not like him, but he’s not even close to these other guys we’re discussing.
"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk
by iglew on Nov 11, 2008 1:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You just said it
Those celebrations alone make him a douchebag.
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Nov 11, 2008 3:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Enh, I don't buy it.
Clemens, Canseco, Giambi etc are douchebags as human beings regardless of what team they play for. K-Rod is a douche only because he played for the Angels. Big big difference.
"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk
by iglew on Nov 11, 2008 1:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
BS
K-Rod will still be a douchebag even when he’s doing his celebrations for some other team next year.
by methodrampage on Nov 11, 2008 2:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
why is Giambi a douchebag?
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Nov 11, 2008 3:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
He’s always seemed like a nice guy to fans and media. If you think he’s a douchebag because of the whole steroids issue and leaving the A’s then I can understand that.
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Nov 12, 2008 2:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dukes and Bonds are just criminals
Dukes is clinically psychopathic— he can’t help himself (although that doesn’t mean he shouldn’t be locked up). Bonds is just selfish, nothing inherently wrong with that.
I have to admit I wasn’t including owners. Loria is a Grade A douchebag.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 8:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What makes you think Loria is anti-competitive?
I mean, his 2 world series rings surely don’t.
by mikev on Nov 10, 2008 8:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Expos experience
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 8:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus he's not marketed the Marlins any better than Crowley's marketed
the A’s. It’s all about “hold up the local population for a new stadium” in my monopoly region. It’s guys like him that got Selig elected commissioner in the first place. The Twins have been pretty good on the field too, but not because Pohlad’s been a strong revenues minded owner.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 8:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Giambi announcement within a week...
probably less. Daric can learn from one of the masters (how to juice and not get caught).
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Nov 10, 2008 9:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How to juice and get caught and then not get caught
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 9:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I might throw John Lackey into that running, too
due solely to the permanent snarl…
witty remark
by dtownmbrown on Nov 10, 2008 9:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
giambi at least semi-apologized for something, how does that make him a worse douchebag than bonds and clemens?
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 10, 2008 10:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's where I stand
Though he totally screwed the A’s over. I’m quick to forgive, though
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 10:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
His "apology" was far worse than Bonds' denial
in that he sought to obtain the beneficial consequences of confession without leaving himself open to the liabilities of admission.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 11:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Come on Paul,
As a future attorney surely you know that Giambi would have been out of his freaking mind to confess to anything. Especially after he’s been deposed by a Federal grand jury. Would you, as an attorney, ever advise a client to “confess and apologize” on national TV?
The dude screwed up…..no doubt about it. But I don’t expect him to put his head in a noose while simultaneously pulling the trip lever. He’s paid in full for his transgressions as far as I’m concerned. If the dude can produce, show him the dotted line.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on Nov 11, 2008 2:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If I knew people would be suckered in by that ridiculous travesty,
I’d have advised him to do exactly what he did. It appears to have worked. I don’t know HOW it worked, but it did.
I’m not annoyed at him for his pseudo-confession (although I am annoyed that he’s a jackass), I’m annoyed at the general public for paying any attention to it.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 11, 2008 10:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can tell you why it "worked".
He was sincere, or at least appeared sincere. Coupled with the fact that by all general accounts, he’s a likable enough guy, he gave the people enough of what they wanted to hear to assuage their sense of morality. Most folks realize that he didn’t even have to do what he did, limited in scope though it was.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on Nov 11, 2008 3:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Plausible denial is Beane's M.O.
"If I've got baggage, he's got a whole set of Louis Vuitton." ~ Milton Bradley on Barry Bonds
by UncleLeo on Nov 10, 2008 8:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What does this mean? Who is he denying to, and what is he denying?
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 8:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It means...
…that Beane denies pretty much everything as part of his standard operating procedure, whether it’s true or not.
"If I've got baggage, he's got a whole set of Louis Vuitton." ~ Milton Bradley on Barry Bonds
by UncleLeo on Nov 10, 2008 10:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
that’s not true
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 10, 2008 10:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Do the A's have a definite interest in Furcal or is it all just AN speculation?
by Erin6 on Nov 10, 2008 2:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
It's been discussed by national media
so, to the extent that any of these rumors are ever credible, those ones are.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 2:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I am super excited about Holliday
Seriously! Very, Very Happy!
But… I am very sad to lose Smith. I really like him and love watching him pitch. Plus he is the one player my BF doesn’t have a problem with me drooling over because he looks just like him! I feel like we didn’t get enough time with Greggy. It would have been nice to have him around for another year, see what he could really do. I will miss him.
"He's day-to-day," Geren said. "But aren't we all?" - 5/29/08
by BobbyCrosbysGirl on Nov 10, 2008 2:47 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
enough time with Greggy
that’s what I was feeling in May (the second coming of Tom Glavine) but by September, the second coming of Ariel Prieto…
Officially awaiting the 2009 season.
by One won lost won on Nov 10, 2008 2:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You're probably going to have to change your username soon as well.
Who’s betting Crosby is getting shipped out for a bag of balls.
This.
by Blicks on Nov 10, 2008 2:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll take him for a bag of balls.
I can turn him into my pet.
Good Crosby… good Crobsy. No, don’t swing at that slider.
by VORP is too nerdy on Nov 10, 2008 2:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Keep in mind you'd have to pay his salary too...
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 2:58 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
What's the point of getting rid of him now?
If you have to pay his salary, might as well keep him. He’s not good, but he’s got speed and he can defend. He wouldn’t be the worst utility infielder in the world if they sign a better SS.
by jsullivan on Nov 10, 2008 5:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He's worth more to a team with a replacement level SS (read St. Louis)
than he is to Oakland as a bench player. Pennington is a much better bench player because he’s an outstanding basestealer.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 8:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not convinced Crosby is better than Izturis
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 8:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Smith was one of my favorites, too.
But his awesome pick-off move is probably even more valuable in the NL than in the AL. Also, someone said he’s a decent hitter (well, decent for a pitcher).
"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk
by iglew on Nov 10, 2008 4:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Definitely the best A's hitting pitcher now that Harden is gone, lol
Duke was just embarrassing at the plate last season.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 8:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You're forgetting The Cupcake Slugger
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 8:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But he didn't get his chance until he left Oakland
God, who’s the best A’s hitting pitcher at this point— Eveland?
Unrelated, but the 49ers really, really suck. Not a good idea to throw interceptions in your own end when you have a 1-point lead.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 8:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
unfortunately, they don't suck as bad as the Raiders...
that was my one saving grace for this season. The Whiners would be worse… but, they’re not.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Nov 10, 2008 9:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why would anyone project Cust in our lineup, let alone in the 4 hole?
Jesus haven’t you seen enough already?
by sactownbull on Nov 10, 2008 2:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Cust is a very valuable player, btw.
He’s a major bang for the buck. He makes most of his outs via strickouts, but he still gets on base at a great clip.
This.
by Blicks on Nov 10, 2008 2:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
And having him in front of Holliday could ensure that our best hitter has someone who will get on base hitting in front of him consistently.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Nov 10, 2008 2:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like Cust as the #2 hitter personally
Especially if by some miracle Chavez returns to form
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 3:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Cust, what an asshole
"You know, a long time ago being crazy meant something. Nowadays everybody's crazy."
-Charles Manson
by kaweahkaweah on Nov 10, 2008 3:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah.
How dare that selfish bastard take walks instead of purposefully fouling off pitches so he can get more hits like Ichiro.
by VORP is too nerdy on Nov 10, 2008 3:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
rofl
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 10, 2008 6:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lolling
"Not in your wildest alcoholic nightmare would you ever imagine such events unfolding!" Bill King
by Buck Turgidson on Nov 10, 2008 4:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Best hitters should be 1-2-4, in descending order of OBP
Holliday probably should hit #2.
In case you’re wondering, BTW, my experience with video game baseball confirms that this is, in fact, the best batting order…
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm so relieved.
I was wondering how video game baseball analysis tied into that.
by VORP is too nerdy on Nov 10, 2008 3:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ah but which video baseball games?
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 3:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
MVP Baseball 2005
Best baseball game ever. Ever. No contest.
But I’ve never played MLB The Show, so.
by VORP is too nerdy on Nov 10, 2008 3:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm right there with you. Ever.
I was asking PT which game he’s using as support.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 3:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Show is really good
but it’s no MVP. Even though it’s several years old, it still beats the show on any of the next-gen systems. Amazing stuff.
by jsullivan on Nov 10, 2008 5:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
Both The Show and MLB 2K7 made some nice cosmetic changes here and there, but neither matches the overall fun of playing MVP.
Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.
by Joey C. on Nov 10, 2008 5:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You folks apparently haven't found the joys of playing
RBI Baseball
The game where ALL the players look like Cust, even the black ones!
"I have more questions after these."-WaddellCanseco
by Gaijin_Suketto on Nov 10, 2008 6:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like Major League Baseball more than RBI
Neither can hold a candle to Little League Baseball or Baseball Stars
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 6:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bases Loaded.
Children, until we have taught them better, will be perfectly happy with a seasonal round of games in which conkers succeeds hopscotch.
by salb918 on Nov 10, 2008 7:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That Paste/Bay combo was deadly
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 7:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll always remember the umps: Yuk, Dum, Boo, Bum
Children, until we have taught them better, will be perfectly happy with a seasonal round of games in which conkers succeeds hopscotch.
by salb918 on Nov 10, 2008 7:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ken Griffey, Jr. Baseball
The first one, not the sequel. Terry Steinbach 4EVR!
Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.
by Joey C. on Nov 10, 2008 7:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
That was totally my childhood. Abusing baserunning and scoring on every play.
by rightbackin on Nov 10, 2008 7:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I enjoy this game, and still occasionally play it
But there’s a few strange bugs in there that just annoy me.
Over the course of a 162 game season, I’d estimate getting 5-10 guys picked off THIRD with the medium lead. And there’s the weird thing where teams frequently leave starters in until they get hurt (meaning they’re at 0% for a LONG time, then their arm falls off).
by thejd44 on Nov 10, 2008 11:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's not a bug...
It’s a team managed by Dusty Baker.
"Some of the men didn't wait for the women and children to jump off the sinking ship that is our season." - 67MARQUEZ
by notsellingjeans on Nov 11, 2008 1:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm specifically thinking of MVP NCAA 2007
I played as Oklahoma State, and had Corey Brown’s alter ego hitting second…
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
COREY BROWN!!!!!!!
As in with the Stockton Ports last season Corey Brown??
"I believe in spiritual rebirth, and I can't wait to experience that." --Barry Zito
by GreenNGoldGirl on Nov 10, 2008 3:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
He’s ridiculously good in that game. He was something like 1100 OPS, 30 steals, 25 HR for me in that season.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
...and how many strikeouts?
I am Ray Fosse's infatuations with Clay Wood and high-definition television.
by franks a lot on Nov 10, 2008 3:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A lot... but keep in mind that a typical 9-inning video game for me involves 9 or 10 strikeouts...
I don’t have the greatest joystick discipline.
[I know what you’re thinking. Don’t even go there.]
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i was thinking you
probably wouldnt be a good fighter pilot
Save Rajai Davis
by oakinboston on Nov 10, 2008 3:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm pretty sure he asked you not to go there.
"God doesn't pay attention to your cute little hypotheticals." -- Jeff from LL
by oblique on Nov 10, 2008 4:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's not where I asked him not to go...
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 8:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If you don't have good joystick discipline
You better have her close her eyes.
Is that where we shouldn’t go?
Am I going to get banned for this post?
by thejd44 on Nov 10, 2008 11:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Last I checked, "go" = urinate and "come" = ejaculate. You're safe.
"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox
by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 10, 2008 11:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I love your work
Especially the remix to “Ignition.”
Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.
by Joey C. on Nov 11, 2008 9:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Never really like MVP '07
Couldn’t get into the whole joystick swing concept.
by jsullivan on Nov 10, 2008 5:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
best 2nd and 4th, favoring OBP 2nd and SLG 4th
No reason to waste SLG in the first spot.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Nov 10, 2008 3:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, its BtB guys!
If we sign Furcal, he’s a lock at #1.
Holliday, I assume, is a lock at #3.
So the question is do you put Cust at #4 for the HR or #2 for the OBP? I always liked him as a 2 hitter, but we really don’t have a #4 this way, and Sweeney is every bit the stereotypical high average no SLG #2.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 3:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The point is that you do NOT want your best hitter hitting #3
Not, not, not.
Why? Because he has a ton of innings where he’s batting with 2 outs and no one on base.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
It would seem that the extra ABs of batting 3 instead of 4 make up for the 36% (or so) of first innings where your #3 comes up with the bases empty.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 3:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's from The Book.
Again, not all that much of a difference, but that’s the result you get when you nitpick all the details.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Nov 10, 2008 4:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 4:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In addition to that
If the best hitter has to come up with nobody on base, you’d rather have nobody out (beginning of 2nd) than with 2 outs.
by thejd44 on Nov 10, 2008 11:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i find that untrue
because if theres anyone you want batting in front of you its your one and two hitters, presumably two of the best guys on your team at getting on base. They don’t call them table setters for nothin’.
by diehardoaklandfan22 on Nov 10, 2008 6:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You want Holliday hitting 4th
with Cust hitting 3rd. We have a .400 OBP (almost) guy that we can hit ahead of our run-producer. Sounds good to me.
"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox
by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 10, 2008 6:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
no
because they get less at bats than if they were hitting 2nd and 3rd.
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 10, 2008 6:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That is only true if the #3 hitter makes the last out of the game.
How many last outs of the game do you think the #3 hitter will make, especially when it’s a guy that gets on base 40% of the time? I’d say MAYBE 20 times. Out of those 20, how many of them are in games that actually matter, rather than just being at the end of the 9th in a 8-2 win or a 7-1 loss? Probably not a meaningful number. That batting order stuff is a load of crap. You bat Holliday behind Cust because the probability that Cust is on base and Holliday drives him in is a HELL of a lot higher than the probability that Holliday gets on and Cust drives him in.
"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox
by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 10, 2008 10:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
all the strickouts!!!!!11
naw i understand what you’re saying. the difference may indeed not be a huge number, but it’s still a fact.
that said, i put sweeney 2nd, holliday 3rd, giambi 4th, cust 5th. ;)
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 11, 2008 12:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You'd be surprised.
There’s about an 18 PA gap between each spot in the batting order. Even .400 OBPs make outs 60% of the time.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Nov 11, 2008 6:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Awesome
Now I rest easy, knowing why I got bumped down from 3rd to 4th on my JV team.
by methodrampage on Nov 10, 2008 3:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
People laugh at the video game thing
But I go with the 1, 2, 4 thing. My 4th best hitter is usually my #3 hitter in all my Out of the Park games, and I frequently score more runs than I should “on paper.” And OOTP is a sim, so it’s not like I have much control over the guys doing well.
The best hitter, overall, should be your #2 guy if possible (according to The Book, anyway). If I recall correctly, you want the overall best guy #2, the best OBP guy (assuming he doesn’t have a ton of power) #1, and #4 should probably be the “classic #4 hitter” type. The whole “best hitter batting third” thing is a weird wrong thing to do.
Of course this is all worth probably not even one full win over the course of a season, so it’s a fairly moot point. But still, may as well do the optimal thing.
by thejd44 on Nov 10, 2008 11:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I hate TTO players in the middle of the lineup
I’m sure someone could prove me wrong statistically, but I hate having Three-True-Outcome (walk, strikeout, homer) batters like Cust (and Durazo before him) hitting in the middle of the lineup. These types of players are essentially unable to adjust their approach to the situation, and it drives me nuts. With RISP and the bases not loaded, the walks are less valuable than the average plate appearance, the strikeouts more costly, and I never feel like the occasional random home run makes up for all the lost opportunities to get a run home by simply making contact.
I prefer to see players like Cust hitting 6th or 7th or 8th, where you don’t expect as much, and a positive result feels more like a bonus. Yeah, that’s probably an emotional argument, not a logical one. And yeah, perhaps Cust is the best #3 hitter in this new lineup. But to me, if a TTO batter is the optimal batter for the middle of your lineup, then your lineup still isn’t constructed very well.
by kenarneson on Nov 10, 2008 5:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you Klaw-baiting us?
If so, $5 please.
by jsullivan on Nov 10, 2008 6:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey it's Ken Arneson!
You still feel this way after a year of the RBI Machine?
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 7:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, I do.
I like Cust. I appreciate what he can and cannot do. I just want a team where there are better options for the #3, #4, and #5 hitters than a guy like him.
Kinda how I felt about Buddy Groom in the late ‘90s. He was a useful reliever, but if you’re a winning team, he’s at the back of your bullpen, not the front. When he’s getting more high-leverage innings than anyone else, it’s a symptom of your team’s overall weakness.
by kenarneson on Nov 10, 2008 9:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That simile just exploded your credibility
Did you overpay for those eggs? @('.')@
by monkeyball on Nov 10, 2008 9:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dude, it's Ken Arneson
He could light his credibility on fire and toss it down a 500-foot mine and still be worth listening to…
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 9:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And after that was he known as Arneson the Gray
Did you overpay for those eggs? @('.')@
by monkeyball on Nov 10, 2008 9:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oddly enough
I am posting this from the bottom of a 500-foot mine. I fell down here in an incredible explosion.
by kenarneson on Nov 10, 2008 9:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
OK, so, your margin for error is gone
Watch yourself, pal.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 9:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There's a whole in my heart, as deep as a mine
We’re sending out love down the mine
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 9:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There's a hole in this mountain, it's dark and it's deep
and God only knows all the secrets it keeps
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 9:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There's a hole in my bucket
Dear Liza, dear Liza
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 9:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I always liked them at the top of the order
Cust is always on base, and at the end of the day, that’s the most important thing. Bat him 2nd. He isn’t that slow.
by MrIncognito on Nov 10, 2008 8:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Believe it or not, Cust adjusts his approach to the situation.
His BA is higher and his walk rate lower when he has RBI opportunities on the pond. Ie runners at 2nd or 3rd with no outs, or 3rd with 1 out.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 8:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
that may or may not be true, but no one will believe it.
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 10, 2008 11:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
the lesson is, never try.
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 11, 2008 12:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He's a coward, that's what he is.
A strickout-loving coward boy. A prancing Nancy OBP walkathon coward face.
"Some of the men didn't wait for the women and children to jump off the sinking ship that is our season." - 67MARQUEZ
by notsellingjeans on Nov 11, 2008 1:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Valuable for a losing team maybe
You don’t win anything with a 230 #4 hitter who strikes out at a record pace
The man’s a defensive liability who takes way too many close pitches. If they A’s really are going to try and make a run they better not be counting on Cust to be the cleanup hitter.
by sactownbull on Nov 10, 2008 3:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Please attempt to understand baseball a little.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 3:09 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
+1
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 10, 2008 7:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We have people in here talking about hitting Cust 2nd
and you’re telling me I need to understand baseball? a 230 hitter who strikes out close to 200 time a year in the #2 hole?
Just when I think this place can’t get any more ridiculous.
by sactownbull on Nov 10, 2008 8:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
no, he'd be a #2 hitter getting on base about 38% of the time
forget about batting average
"This is Rickey, calling on behalf of Rickey."
by scatterbrian on Nov 10, 2008 8:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
your reply is a lot friendlier than than the one I was typing
i’ll defer to you.
Save Rajai Davis
by oakinboston on Nov 10, 2008 8:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
2nd is exactly where I'd bat Cust
Furcal or Sweeney or Buck
Cust
Holliday
Chavez
Suzuki
and go from there. People getting on base followed by people who drive in runs. Yay!!!!
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Nov 10, 2008 8:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd go for
Furcal
Buck
Cust
Holliday
Sweeney
Chavez
Suzuki
Ellis
The SS
Get our best RBI guys, Holliday and Sweeney, right behind Cust.
"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox
by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 10, 2008 10:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Is Furcal playing outfield?
I assume you mean the other OF
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 10:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah yeah whatever
I’m not used to making lineups with actual hitters in them.
"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox
by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 10, 2008 10:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like that lineup with Cunningham.
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 10:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually the one I forgot was Barton.
Good thing I left that nine spot open…
In all seriousness, I really hope he rediscovers his stroke, because a 1-4 of Furcal/Barton/Cust/Holliday could be potentially very good.
"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox
by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 10, 2008 10:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I had Cunningham playing the second shortstop position, of course
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 10:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In all honesty, we really can't expect much worse
from Barton, right? He has to be better than last year, I would hope.
witty remark
by dtownmbrown on Nov 10, 2008 11:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
.279/.419/.500/.919 in September
He still is a talented hitter, and he’s still young. I expect him to turn it around.
"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox
by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 10, 2008 11:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
One thing's for sure, he is excellent in September.
witty remark
by dtownmbrown on Nov 10, 2008 11:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Do people on here even understand the value of productive outs?
Cust hitting two means far less balls in play as well as clogging the bases up for people that run well (like Holliday) A #2 hitter has a job to do that goes beyond walks and OBP. I swear half the people on here have been brainwashed by Beane.
by sactownbull on Nov 10, 2008 8:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Friendly, non-condescending reply
Whew, I feel much better
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 8:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Personally, I find walks more productive than outs
but that’s just me.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Nov 10, 2008 8:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Last year, batting in the middle of the lineup, Jack Cust had 12 ABs with a runner on 3rd and less than 2 outs. He picked up 10 RBIs in those 12 ABs, so would you please stop talking until you become more informed about baseball? Thanks.
You are a very ignorant baseball fan.
by MrIncognito on Nov 10, 2008 8:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So this is what's become of my swingin' A's fan base?
It’s now a bill beane cult?
This baseball by the numbers bull can only go so far. At some point you have to use so good old fashioned baseball sense.
Cust is in no way a #2 hitter or even a #4 hitter for a winning team. If you can hide him at 7 or 8 then fine. But we have to get off this sabermetrics obsession.
by sactownbull on Nov 10, 2008 8:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, what did a sabermetrics-minded GM ever accomplish?
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 8:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
At some point you have to use so good old fashioned baseball sense.
Why?
by Graham on Nov 10, 2008 8:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
At some point we need to get off this "electricity" thing and go back to good old fashioned.. "not-electricity" thing
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 8:34 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I'm all about the hunter-gatherer thing
by Graham on Nov 10, 2008 8:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Back in my day, my car got 40 rods to the hogshead and that's the way I like it.
by MrIncognito on Nov 10, 2008 8:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Back in my day the A's won championships
by sactownbull on Nov 10, 2008 8:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
When did they win a championship while valuing outs
over walks?
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 8:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not valuing walks over outs
It’s put outs vs strike outs
It’s having different parts to your lineup and having players that know their roles. you don’t need or want 9 players that all do the same thing offensively.
by sactownbull on Nov 10, 2008 8:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If you value someone with a worse OBP than Cust
with fewer K’s you’re valuing Outs over Walks
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 8:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You can't make a blanket statement like that
If I have a player who’s OBP is 20-40 points lower than Cust but strikes out half as much I would argue he’s more valuable as a #2 hitter. And that’s what really kicked this whole thing off… people talking about Cust hitting 2.
by sactownbull on Nov 10, 2008 8:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure you can argue that, but you'd be
valuing outs over walks.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 8:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
*throws up hands and leaves post*
it’s not worth arguing over
but I doubt you’ll see Cust hitting second ….. and us winning any way
peace
by sactownbull on Nov 10, 2008 8:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you wan to "hide" cust at 7 or 8
in what magical fantasy land do the a’s have all these hitters with a .360 OBP, who strike out half as much as cust?
or is it that you prefer some imaginary guy hitting ahead of cust?
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 10, 2008 11:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps you are talking about Sandy Alderson?
Because he was into numbers too. Hate to tell you.
Go look at the walk totals for the 88-90 A’s.
by MrIncognito on Nov 10, 2008 8:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not against walks or OBP at all
but it isn’t the answer for everything. especially when players have other major short comings
by sactownbull on Nov 10, 2008 8:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Like the ability to hit 500-foot home runs
33 times a year
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 8:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Who the hell is hitting 500 foot HRs?
33 times a year?
by sactownbull on Nov 10, 2008 8:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
33 500 foot home runs?
if u say so
by sactownbull on Nov 10, 2008 8:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They'd have rolled that far eventually
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 8:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, I fall prey to my own hyperbole sometimes
only 32 of them went 500 feet.
The 33rd went 600.
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 9:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I hear you
Regarding your Cust at #2, you have to expand on your point more precisely or people on AN will jump all over you like you are an Angels fan.
If I’m not mistaken, I think what you were trying to say is that having 9 players that have the same strengths and weaknesses as hitters is worse than having hitters with a diverse range of strengths and weaknesses. And I think everyone agrees with that.
The question is, how much team OBP is that worth. I see it as a question of OBP at what cost of versatility rather than Walks versus Outs.
www.punditpolitics.com - Political IQ Tests, Pundit Blog, News and Opinion.
by ChadGod on Nov 10, 2008 9:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't agree with "that", at least not to any significant degree
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 9:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd much rather have 9 TTO players than 8 TTO players and an Eckstein clone
Diversity for the sake of diversity is bad. Homogeneity, on the other hand, is impossible anyway so I think this tangent is meaningless.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 10:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, what are we talking about here
we shouldn’t have cust because we already have cust-like hitters at every other position?
who are all these guys and why are they not hitting 30 home runs and walking 100 times a year?
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 10, 2008 11:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Back in the small ball days of productive outs
When Canseco bunted McGwire to scoring position
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 8:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
With the two Hendersons and the top of the lineup
and Carney Lansford before the power
They knew how to put a winning lineup together
by sactownbull on Nov 10, 2008 8:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You were right the 1st time
Lansford never hit behind the power. As much as I liked Carney, he wasn’t a good choice to hit #2.
by MrIncognito on Nov 10, 2008 9:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Lansford hit 5-7 most of the time
http://www.baseball-almanac.com/box-scores/boxscore.php?boxid=198707120OAK
He saw more of the two hole from 89 on.
And he was a good choice for a #2 hitter. You want someone there that can put the ball in play and doesn’t strike out a lot. Lansford fit that bill.
by sactownbull on Nov 11, 2008 10:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You have serious issues with data
Finding a single box score from 1987 in which lansford hit 5th is seriously not convincing. First off, they were an 81-81 team that year. Secondly, even in 1987 Lansford hit 3rd more often than he hit in any other spot in the lineup.
Moving on to the WS winning team, here’s every A’s batting order from every game in 1989:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/OAK/1989_bo.shtml
Lansford hit 2nd more frequently than any other player, and hit 2nd in the majority of his games.
In the other playoff years, it was similar. In 1988, Lansford hit leadoff most frequently, in 1990 he hit 2nd almost exclusively.
You’re busy bragging up your 35 years of baseball experience in the other thread. It would be helpful if you either accurately remembered those 35 years or double checked the data to see if it fit with your perceptions.
by MrIncognito on Nov 11, 2008 12:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
*sigh*
Rickey is one of the greatest players of all time. So, yeah, obviously having Rickey on the team would be great.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on Nov 10, 2008 10:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
bring back rickey!!
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 10, 2008 11:14 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Rickey Henderson would've been the best leadoff hitter ever
Even if he never attempted one steal. His stolen bases obviously helped and made him a better player, but they’re not the REASON he was a great leadoff hitter.
He was a great leadoff hitter because he got on base 40% of the time.
by thejd44 on Nov 10, 2008 11:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
good post
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 11, 2008 1:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I dream of bringing antelope down with my teeth
That’s real living there.
by Graham on Nov 10, 2008 8:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, why discuss rational concerns when we can have Truthiness?
You argue about productive outs, and then when facted with the fact that Cust made very productive outs, you revert to your need for every hitter to appeal to your sense of the Way Things Ought To Be.
by MrIncognito on Nov 10, 2008 8:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Let's go get Nick Swisher back too
You can’t have enough 240 hitters with high OBP
And some point you have to have someone that drives in runners and moves people with some consistency. There’s a reason the A’s have come up short in the playoffs during the Beane era.
by sactownbull on Nov 10, 2008 8:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I nominate you
to run the rest of the AL West.
Pretty please
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 8:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, but you have to take Bavasi back
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 8:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't actually see the difference.
Actually, Bavasi was funny. So I guess there’s that.
by Graham on Nov 10, 2008 8:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Because the playoffs are pretty random and you've been unlucky?
by Graham on Nov 10, 2008 8:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But we haven't been lucky enough to get out of round #1
but once?
run those odds through your computer
by sactownbull on Nov 10, 2008 8:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
About 1/16 off the top of my head?
Hardly spectacular.
by Graham on Nov 10, 2008 8:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You have a computer on the top of your head?
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 8:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Playoff record, by year:
2006: 3-4
2003: 2-3
2002: 2-3
2001: 2-3
2000: 2-3
That’s bad luck, period.
by MrIncognito on Nov 10, 2008 8:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Also, Jeremy Giambi and Miguel Tejada forgetting how to run the bases has nothing to do with walking, nor does Jermaine Dye snapping his leg in half.
by MrIncognito on Nov 10, 2008 8:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Technically, Dye's injury does..
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 8:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If only he had swung and missed like Cust rather than hitting the ball
by Graham on Nov 10, 2008 8:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think JL means he wasn't able to walk after
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 9:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I realise.
Was making a snarky comment all on my own!
by Graham on Nov 10, 2008 9:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually Tejada was walking
which was the problem.
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Nov 11, 2008 4:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Who lead the team in RBI last year?
I’ll give you a hint. It was Jack Cust.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 10:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
33 home runs and only 77 RBI
Take a look at the RBI of other players who hit 33
Grady Sizemore 90
David Wright 124
Chase Utley 104
Mark Teixeira 120
Pat Burrell 86
Hanley Ramirez 67
Jim Thome 89
Cust scored 77 runs as well. Now let’s look at runs scored by other players with a 375 OBP
Ryan Ludwick 104
Carlos Beltran 115
Justin Morneau 97
Ian Kinsler 102
Johnny Damon 95
Dustin Pedroia 118
Jason Bay 111
Now of course you’re going to score more runs if you’re on a team with better hitters …… but even Randy Winn scored more runs (86) than Cust, despite have an OBP a few points lower at 363. Randy Winn who played for the power house known as the 2008 SF Giants.
Bottom line is the game is about scoring and driving in runs. OBP is important but it can’t be used as an all in one defense.
by sactownbull on Nov 11, 2008 10:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NO ONE WAS ON BASE IN FRONT OF HIM
AND NO ONE HIT BEHIND HIM.
The A’s had no offense last season. At all. Jack Cust was THE ONLY GOOD HITTER ON THE TEAM. Runs and RBIs are functionally team stats, not individual stats.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 11, 2008 11:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you can't get rbi's if nobody's on base.
If you organize the teams in OBP, the teams with the highest avg OBP are the teams with the most runs scored(with the exception of the twins who hit something like 320 w/ risp, a feat they will not repeat). OBP correlates to runs more than any other stat.
"It's like déjà vu all over again." -yogi berra
by Cheezombie on Nov 11, 2008 11:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So your argument is that leading the teams in RBIs and runs (which don't even measure individual performance) makes him bad at driving in runners and scoring runs?
Fail.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 11, 2008 7:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hence us trading for Matt Holliday
He drives in runs.
You are advocating guys that move runners around on the bases while making outs. I’d prefer guys that can steal a bag without our guy having to sacrifice the out. The name of the game is to get guys on base and then get them home from said base. There’s no need to waste outs moving them from first to second or second to third, just get them home.
The worst managing I’ve ever seen is when managers get the first guy on base in the bottom of the ninth to try to tie the game, and then immediately bunt him to second. The next guy usually grounds to second, moving the runner to third, and then the next guy flies to center and ends the game. Useless baseball.
"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox
by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 10, 2008 10:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I am not advocating that
I said Cust makes a poor number #4 hitter and even poorer #2. More balls in play mean more runs being driven in. A walk isn’t moving anyone unless you have a force… and even then it’s one one bag at a time. Base hits move runners more than one bag at a time and score runs. It’s dangerous to elevate the importance of OBP and discount the batting average all together. If you look at the OBP then I want to see runs scored to go with all the times your getting on base. If you’re a poor baserunner it’s not going to be as high. If you’re going to hit 3-4-5 then I want to see your RBI totals … OBP doesn’t help a lot there. Cust is deficient on both fronts.
by sactownbull on Nov 11, 2008 10:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
More balls in play mean more runs being driven in
At least we’ve identified the problem: somehow you have come to believe this statement, which is unequivocally, absolutely, blatantly NOT TRUE.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 11, 2008 11:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Paul, it is true
given a fixed number of runners in scoring position in front of you (call it 100-completely made up), more balls in play would increase the number of RBIs. Specifically, if BABIP is .300, then you’d have about .3 of a hit with RISP per extra ball in play.
Note that this is all Ceteris Paribus, I’m just saying that assuming nothing else is sacrificed for the extra balls in play, those do have marginal value in terms of RBI.
by ohmangoAs on Nov 11, 2008 12:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, sure
More balls in play with RISP means more runners being driven in.
More balls in play with men on first results in LESS runners being driven in, because you GIDP and end innings.
Since the two basically cancel out…
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 11, 2008 2:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good point on the GIDP
hadn’t considered that.
But I’m not sure you can emphatically say
More balls in play mean more runs being driven in
At least we’ve identified the problem: somehow you have come to believe this statement, which is unequivocally, absolutely, blatantly NOT TRUE.
based on
the two basically cancel out…
Also, batting a player in from first rarely happens, so DP’s don’t lower RBI much.
the only scenario in which DP hurts RBI is in a 1 out, bases loaded or 1 out, first and second situation.
I doubt those come up that often, while the extra hits with RISP I brought up should happen more often. So I doubt they cancel out.
by ohmangoAs on Nov 11, 2008 4:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
For an individual player, yes
but he didn’t say more balls in play led to more RBIs for a certain hitter, he said they led to more runs being driven in. Which isn’t true. The extra RBIs for the first player are just “stolen” from the players hitting behind him. They don’t help the team any.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 11, 2008 11:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
OK, what about the Twins?
Are they not a team that has players that can drive in runners and move people over with consistency? Are they not a team tat emphasises this?
So, I presume the Twins have won a WS?
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on Nov 10, 2008 10:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You know what's much more valuable than productive outs?
Not getting out.
by Graham on Nov 10, 2008 8:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Productive safes! Yay!!!!!!!
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Nov 10, 2008 8:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I will definately use that phrase.
by MrIncognito on Nov 10, 2008 8:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We need a sarcastic saying like Productive OOts for situations like this
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 8:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
OOts
Is that Canadien?
The monster at the end of this blog.
by grover on Nov 10, 2008 8:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it's South African
Canadian would be “oats.”
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 8:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm all about pOOts
Did you overpay for those eggs? @('.')@
by monkeyball on Nov 10, 2008 8:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There should be a glossary for stuff like this
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 8:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
“productive outs”? “clogging the bases”?
welcome to AN, dusty baker!
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 10, 2008 11:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I've been brainwashed by Beane
So brainwashed that I don’t even believe in “clogging the bases”!
"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk
by iglew on Nov 11, 2008 1:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Just half? There's some work to be done.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Nov 11, 2008 6:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You can't ground into a double play when you don't hit ground balls...
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Nov 11, 2008 6:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
oh good
I was worried that at an emotional time like this we would be missing out on some good ol visceral Cust bashing.
Save Rajai Davis
by oakinboston on Nov 10, 2008 3:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't you guys have a primer on Ks/AVG/OBP you can just link to at times like this?
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Nov 10, 2008 3:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No, we just call people morons until they go away.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 3:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
[hides behind sturdy object]
[watches PT enter room]
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Nov 10, 2008 3:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I hate you and find you stupid.
Nothing personal, though. It’s just a reaction to people who think Jack Cust isn’t good.
by mikev on Nov 10, 2008 3:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
For serious
what’s with the Cust hate? He walks and hits the ball a mile. It’s effing beautiful. What is so much more exciting about the Ecksteins of the world that never strike out but never hit it out of the infield?
by jsullivan on Nov 10, 2008 5:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't get me wrong,
I loves me some Cust, but watching the guy try to hit a curveball is torture.
by Sliderule on Nov 10, 2008 5:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
because he's looking fastball
like every other baseball player in the world
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 10, 2008 7:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He's actually pretty good at laying of the pitches he can't hit
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 7:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yup
Pretty tough to OBP what he does if you’re just hacking at slop. See Feliz, Pedro.
by jsullivan on Nov 11, 2008 7:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yet in 2006 Feliz drove in more runs and scored as many as Cust did last year
With a 281 OBP
I in no way am saying Feliz is a good player but be careful thinking HRs and OBP always translates into scoring or driving in runs.
by sactownbull on Nov 11, 2008 10:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll give you a hint why he drove in and scored more runs than Cust did
The hint is: he had the fucking greatest hitter in baseball history in his lineup hitting 2 spots ahead of him.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 11, 2008 11:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ha! I read his comment as 2008 and thought you had lost your marbles.
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Nov 12, 2008 2:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
…
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Nov 10, 2008 3:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
jack cust is the man
you have insulted his honor. take that back sir les I challenge yee to a duel.
Cust is the new Jaha.
by johnjahafanclub on Nov 10, 2008 3:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Glove slap...
baby, glove slap…
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Finally...
A chance to bust out my “I heart dueling” bumper sticker and demand satisfaction.
by DiegoAsFan on Nov 10, 2008 8:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Did you know that trial by combat has not been officially abolished as a common law doctrine?
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 8:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dude, yer killin' me
Res ipsa yesterday, trial by combat today… I come here to escape law school.
Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.
by Joey C. on Nov 10, 2008 9:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So do I
Just handed in my final memo of the semester about 3 hours ago… hence the drunk posting.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 9:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, then congratulations are in order
Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.
by Joey C. on Nov 10, 2008 9:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ugh, I don't even want to think about Memo's
Reminds me what I should be working on.
by DiegoAsFan on Nov 10, 2008 9:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It reminds you about having wayward apostrophy's?
(pun intended)
by mikev on Nov 10, 2008 10:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Finding Memo?
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Nov 11, 2008 4:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you know what they call it if you badger the witness?
Trial by wombat.
Did you overpay for those eggs? @('.')@
by monkeyball on Nov 10, 2008 9:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And if you badger the witness to death
Mortal Wombat
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 9:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Wombat wombat wombat wombat
fungus fungus!
Actually, a badger isn’t even remotely related to a wombat from a taxonomic perspective. I blame monkeyball for that.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 9:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That is to say
I don’t blame him for MAKING a badger unrelated to a wombat, I blame him for confusing the issue.
God, it’s a good thing I’m not writing that memo right now.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 9:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's only because you refuse to recognize the legitimacy of a flat, regressive taxonomy
Did you overpay for those eggs? @('.')@
by monkeyball on Nov 10, 2008 9:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Correct
Dictatorship of the wombat is inevitable.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 9:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk
by iglew on Nov 11, 2008 1:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ryan Howard?
Or do #3 hitters who hit .250 not count at all?
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Nov 11, 2008 6:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Blikes hates strickouts
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 5:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
double plays?
how bout all the double plays with 1st and 2nd no outs?
by Wreckonized on Nov 10, 2008 8:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you fail so hard for that
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 10, 2008 6:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it's too much
especially if it’s just for a one-year rental. Why trade Carlos Gonzalez (the prize piece in the Haren deal) for a player that leaves after one season?? And please don’t tell me that we get two draft picks … that hardly seems worth it.
Street and Smith I can totally do without … no big deal. But either Beane and Co. really saw something in Gonzalez that scared them to death, or they’re planning on working out an extension for Holliday … but trading Carlos Gonzalez straight up for Holliday for one season doesn’t even seem worth it to me … what am I missing?
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
by Vacafan on Nov 10, 2008 2:53 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
The "straight up" was supposed to be bold ... sorry, my head's spinning.
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
by Vacafan on Nov 10, 2008 2:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Turns out Anderson was the prize of the Haren deal.
"With 16-year-old Dominican righty Michel Inoa in tow, Gio Gonzalez improving at Triple-A and lefty Brett Anderson carving up Double-Abatters along with Simmons and Trevor Cahill, Oakland’s pitching depthis officially the envy of baseball." - BaseballAmerica.com
by Syphon on Nov 10, 2008 2:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, I would not trade Anderson for Gonzalez in a one-for-one swap
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 2:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus, Cunningham could very well be better than CarGo next year.
I said before, CarGo has a much higher ceiling, but he’s also less likely to reach it.
by mikev on Nov 10, 2008 3:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I really like how he played in center field...
Cunningham could outhit him significantly and be less valuable if Patrol Craft keeps playing good defense up the middle.
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Nov 10, 2008 3:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's the reason why I'm surprised at this deal
Gonzalez was really a standout defender last season, one of the best CF in baseball. The A’s typically don’t let that kind of defender get away.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Gonzalez was slightly better last season
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If you don't think draft picks are worth it, you're clearly not in the same boat as Beane.
I think they gave up a lot so they COULD sign him long term. Hopefully they will. If they don’t… I’d probably rather have CarGon, but the A’s have a track record for failing to develop hitters consistently, and CarGon was almost ALL tools, so there was a strong chance he wouldn’t have lived up to his potential IMO
by NateHST on Nov 10, 2008 2:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I guess you have to ask yourself ..."Self, would you trade CarGon for two draft picks next year?
I’d answer “No.”
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
by Vacafan on Nov 10, 2008 2:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Gonzalez had no plate discipline before coming to the A's
And I’m guessing that the A’s just don’t love that approach. I think that would have a lot to do with it. It’s funny, in some ways I expect Gonzalez to suddenly have more power at Coors because a lot of those doubles will turn into home runs. But I think C-Gon needs more seasoning in the minors.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Nov 10, 2008 2:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, my take on it is that Beane & Co.
acquired Gonzalez for his trade-value down the road, in hopes that he would be a chip that would be valuable in getting somebody like, perhaps, Matt Holliday.
He is not the type of hitter that fits in with the Oakland mold, but he is still vluable as a top prospect.
witty remark
by dtownmbrown on Nov 10, 2008 3:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
but does cargon have more trade value now than he did a year ago when the a’s traded for him?
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 10, 2008 11:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No
A prospect loses value every down year he has. If you look at Gonzalez’s stats between AAA and Oakland last year, they were very subpar. If he never improves his plate discipline, Beane made a damn smart sell-high here. We’ll have to wait and see.
"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox
by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 10, 2008 11:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
and he probably had more value today than he will have after another year like last year...
despite all his touting, it seemed to me that he had a lot more seasoning to do down in the minors before he really becae an impact bat in the majors.
Also, somebody else brought up the point, too, that Holliday probably has more value at the deadline than Street + CarGon, but I’m not really sure on that one either. I guess that all depends on the first halves they have in 09.
witty remark
by dtownmbrown on Nov 10, 2008 11:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
excellent post
my thoughts exactly
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 10, 2008 7:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
well, thats not really true
Colorado doesnt turn doubles into homers, only thing you can really expect is more XBH and a higher BABIP there then other places, but its not the launching pad it used to be.
Check out my baseball analysis blog FANalytics
by jbluestone on Nov 11, 2008 5:27 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
compensation picks
And please don’t tell me that we get two draft picks … that hardly seems worth it.
don’t we actually lose draft picks?
even assuming smith is worthless in 3-5 years…
+2 picks for holliday in 2010
-2 picks for street in 2011
-2 picks for cargon in 6 years
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 10, 2008 11:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And if CarGon is a Type A, the A's lost a lot more than two draft picks.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Nov 11, 2008 6:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This assumes Street is healthy enough to qualify
And it assumes Cargon is good/healthy.
by thejd44 on Nov 11, 2008 12:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
street will almost certainly qualify. it could potentially be 2-6, i was trying to be reasonable with 2-4.
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 11, 2008 1:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like it
My pros:
1. Whether or not you believe in “protection,” I would put Cust in front of Holiday. Pitchers will be less likely to throw him all the junk that he can’t hit because he, of course, will take a walk, setting the table for Holliday.
2. Holliday fills the right handed power hole that everybody in the entire world is aware of…makes the A’s less susceptible to lefties.
3. Takes car of the carousel that the A’s had in left (Cust, Murton, Cunningham, Denorfia, Davis, etc etc etc)
4. Several articles lately about the possibility of Beane having up to 80 million in payroll indicates they may be able to sign him long term. If not, they get a year of Holliday plus draft picks, which we all love anyways.
5. Greg Smith was expendable, Huston Street was a whiner
My Cons
1. CarGon was our future CF and our only five-tool prospect, but we all know tools don’t always = success. Granted, I think he had a lot of success ahead of him, the A’s weren’t helping in his development because you know… he was a hitter and not a pitcher.
2. He’ll be expensive.
3. The A’s were anything but locks to make a run at the playoffs next year. It helps. But Anaheim is Anaheim and Texas has a slew of good prospects, just like us.
My solution to Con #1… Switch Jemile Weeks to CF. He won’t be ready for a couple of years, but I think he’s the only solution to our current gap in CF. Unless Sweeney develops SOME power, I don’t think he’ll be good enough to stay his whole career. This also leaves 2B of the future open for Cardenas, who’s not good enough to play short and doesn’t have enough power to stick at 3rd.
by NateHST on Nov 10, 2008 2:53 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I ultimately expect Jemile Weeks to play CF for the 2011 Athletics
He just does not seem like an infielder to me.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 2:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Since protection has been proven time and again to not exist
It would be wiser to have Holliday in front of Cust. If pitchers are ever less likely to risk walking Cust, it’s when Holliday is already on base.
by thejd44 on Nov 11, 2008 12:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Other way around makes more sense
They’ll both be on base a lot and Holliday is more likely to drive in Cust than the other way around. And it’s perfectly fine
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Nov 11, 2008 12:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
When
was the last time we had this problem?
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Nov 11, 2008 4:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Boras Thing
I know it’s fashionable to say “OMG Boras, ewww”, and believe me I hate him as much as the next sports fan, but there is a silver lining here.
The A’s are – at best – a lightly attended potentially contending team. All we have to lure Holliday is money. Boras, coincidentally, would murder his grandmother for $20. If we can make Holliday the deal he wants (6/120? 7/150? Whatever it is.) Boras is exactly the kind of agent who will make sure he takes it rather than signing for less with the Red Sox or something.
We have the money, it won’t cripple us. Lets get the deal done.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 2:54 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
For $20, he'd demand an option to murder his grandfather, too
Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.
by Joey C. on Nov 10, 2008 2:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's an awful thing to say about Scott Boras
but it most certainly made me laugh out loud. One of the reasons Pacific was appealing was that Scott Boras graduated from the Sport Management program here in 1982. I strive for his success, without the money-sucking fiend part of it ;]
"I believe in spiritual rebirth, and I can't wait to experience that." --Barry Zito
by GreenNGoldGirl on Nov 10, 2008 3:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
True, although Boras had a leg up in that he actually played pro ball
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Boras's "success, without the money-sucking fiend part of it"
= “Eric Chavez, when healthy”
"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk
by iglew on Nov 10, 2008 4:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
good post
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 10, 2008 7:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Happy with mixed emotions
Sad to see Carlos go because I thought he would be special but again we would probably lose him as soon as he got to that point. I want to see the A’s try to sign Holliday and then just let Chavez go or trade him for nothing just to get rid of that contract. Does anybody know if there is real interest in Furcal from the A’s or is this just a seculation and hope on here? because if they added Furcal and combined with the current pieces you havea good team and makes perfect sense even if they do not attempt to resign holliday.
by yawedout21 on Nov 10, 2008 2:55 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Why do the majority think we are over paying?
Street= going down hill, was demoted late last season.
CarGon= No discipline and was not developing, thus sent down.
Smith= Average at best. Great pickoff move which we will all miss
but the biggest thing not mentioned at all today is the guy had Elbow surgery
this off-season.
by HRH on Nov 10, 2008 2:57 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Great point on Smith
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 2:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"Was not developing"
Geez, can we give a guy who most teams would’ve kept in the minors another season or two, a little time??!!
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
by Vacafan on Nov 10, 2008 3:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure
But his numbers in the minors aren’t that great. He’s the same age as Cunningham. Cunningham as a 880 OPS in the minors. Gonzalez, 813. Cunningham has shown the ability to produce offensively in the minors, regardless of league or home park. Gonzalez not so much.
Anderson aside, I’d take Cunningham over Gonzalez too.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on Nov 10, 2008 3:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, you guys follow that stuff closer than I do ...
perhaps I drank the Kool-Aid when we traded Haren, and I considered him a “can’t miss” when he really can (miss, that is.)
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
by Vacafan on Nov 10, 2008 3:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Cunningham has definitely been more consistent
But Gonzalez was/is one of those guys that has practically unfair tools. And he had all five of them. More power potential, better defense, ridiculous arm.
It’s comparing two different types of prospects…
by NateHST on Nov 10, 2008 3:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, OK, I should have pointed out that Gonzales' has good tools
But to date, except for a season here or there, he’s not translated his tools into actual production, even in the minors. And unlike Cunningham, prior to coming to the A’s, he spent his whole career in environments favourable to hitters. Cunningham, when he was with the WS, was in more pitcher friendly enviroments, and yet, he still outhit Gonzales.
Also, Gonzales has good tools. But I wouldn’t say that he’s got “unfair” tools. They aren’t out of this world great. They aren’t better than other young toolsy OFs really.
Yeah, they’re 2 different type of prospects, but, they’re both OFs, they’re both competing for the same spots.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on Nov 10, 2008 3:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
His plate discipline is also an issue.
This.
by Blicks on Nov 10, 2008 3:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't give up on Street.
Unless he’s hiding an injury, he has too much pre-2008 success to think 2008 is his new level of performance.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Nov 10, 2008 3:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We aren't
We’re just (1) Tired of him, because with closers you remember the failures more than the successes and (2) looking forward to the Devine era.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 3:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and (3) already 99% sure he was gone before spring training.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 3:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You know, I really like Joey Devine
But seriously… this place is going to fucking melt down the first time he blows a save.
by mikev on Nov 10, 2008 3:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And why's that?
I’d hope everyone here is intelligent enough to not overreact over a couple blown saves. If he starts blowing saves right and left then, sure, go into panic mode.
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Nov 10, 2008 3:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You must not have seen all the overreaction from Street's blown saves.
Because, blown saves or not, Street is still a REALLY good pitcher.
by mikev on Nov 10, 2008 3:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm glad somebody agrees with me on that
While I’m ok with trading Street, people here were acting like he had no value.
Turns out he’s the best player going to thye Rockies in a trade for Matt Holliday.
by thejd44 on Nov 11, 2008 12:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why Ziggy shouldn't be closing this year
Love the guy, love the delivery but you can’t have a K rate that low with iffy command and just keep hoping that the ground balls keep finding gloves.
Unless we can clone Mark Ellis three times, that is. That could work…
by jsullivan on Nov 10, 2008 5:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ziggy has excellent command
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Nov 10, 2008 7:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Command isn't the same as control
If I’m Ziggy, I’m totally OK with walking guys with 0 or 1 out, because I figure I just nail them on a DP ball.
Ziggy is the rare player whose command is better than his control.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 8:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Just so he doesn't walk around "going controllo"
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Nov 10, 2008 8:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
[waves hand over head in pathetic gesture of incomprehension]
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 9:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
commando!
Come on DrunkPaul. SoberPaul would’ve gotten that.
"Some of the men didn't wait for the women and children to jump off the sinking ship that is our season." - 67MARQUEZ
by notsellingjeans on Nov 10, 2008 10:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Objection, assumes facts not in evidence
SoberPaul is a great misser-of-jokes as well.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 10:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He overanalyzes them too much,
like most sobermetricians.
(And so ends my brief foray into punnery. I bid adieu to you nevermoor, Nico, and the goat community).
"Some of the men didn't wait for the women and children to jump off the sinking ship that is our season." - 67MARQUEZ
by notsellingjeans on Nov 11, 2008 1:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well played sir
I'm here to talk about the past.
by 67MARQUEZ on Nov 11, 2008 5:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You have to understand, most of AN values Street
at somewhere between Scott Proctor and Paris Hilton from a competency standpoint.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Do we value Proctor or Paris more?
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 5:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you saying that
1) Street isn’t a very valuable reliever (he’s a product of the defense and ballpark)
or
2) He’s overrated because he’s a “closer”.
Because he’s a very good reliever. The strikeouts ticked down a bit last year and the walks ticked up, but that’s probably the result of injury more than anything.
by jsullivan on Nov 10, 2008 7:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
PT's a big Steet booster, I believe
He’s referring to the uninformed opinion of much of AN based off a couple blown saves
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 7:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
this is right
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 10, 2008 7:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
{rifles through CGV Manual of Reprehensible Epithets to find "big Steet booster"}
Did you overpay for those eggs? @('.')@
by monkeyball on Nov 10, 2008 7:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, typo
It should’ve read “big teets booster”
au contra ire
by JediLeroy on Nov 10, 2008 8:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 8:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
what I don't like about it is
what was the point of starting the rebuilding process last year if we trade away the prospects for one year players this year?
and the coloseum isn’t exactly coors fields….
Ellis for President
by tosk on Nov 10, 2008 2:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
And his road OPS last year (.896 or something) isn't exactly shabby
And why do you say he’s a 1 year player?
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 3:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
on the A's for a year I mean..
I don’t expect him to get an extention.
but your right on about the road OPS.. and the 2009 A’s are now better than the 2008 team.
Ellis for President
by tosk on Nov 10, 2008 3:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree on no extension.
I doubt Holliday signs for anything resembling a good deal, especially for a relatively low-payroll team like the A’s. The two draft picks coming back are pretty valuable.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Nov 10, 2008 3:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
wouldn't Street alone have nabbed the A's 2 picks?
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Nov 10, 2008 3:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
IF Street kept up production at the same level for 2 more years.
which is somewhat of a wildcard, although highly likely.
This.
by Blicks on Nov 10, 2008 3:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ah, for some reason I was under the impression he'd be gone at the same time. Never mind.
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Nov 10, 2008 3:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
no.
Doubt a mid-reliever would land much. Remember nobody wanted him at the deadline.
by HRH on Nov 10, 2008 3:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Market value has little to do with Elias value
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Nov 10, 2008 3:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
but we are not talking about Huston Street of the past (1st 2 years in the league).
He is NOT what he used to be and hasn’t been for a couple of seasons now.
by HRH on Nov 10, 2008 3:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Huston Street would easily have landed the A's 2 picks
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
By tRA, Street's best season was 2007.
http://www.statcorner.com/pitcherRP.php?id=434718&team=OAK&year=2008&leag=A_L
And even though he seemed to suck last year, his tERA was 3.20ish
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Nov 10, 2008 4:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Street's post injury 2007 was totally insane
One of the best half-seasons any reliever has posted in recent memory.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 8:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Street's consistently been worth
somewhere between 15-20 runs per year over average during his career. He’s pretty criminally underrated these days.
by Graham on Nov 10, 2008 8:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Putting '-' around things makes a strikethrough?
Learn something new every day.
by Graham on Nov 10, 2008 8:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's in the formatting glossary at the bottom where you post without replying
There’s a whole bunch of those
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 9:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I believe reliever value is highly tied to saves.
So maybe the A’s keep him as a setup guy next year to keep his arb cost down, then they let him close in 2010 to bump up his Elias value. Or maybe that’s playing god a little too much.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
by Sky Kalkman on Nov 10, 2008 4:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
well
Smith having elbow surgery reduces his value for sure so all they really gave up in the rebuilding process was Carlos? I mean that is only one guy anyone will tell you the farm system is loaded
by yawedout21 on Nov 10, 2008 3:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We traded one prospect.
We still have very many of them left.
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Nov 10, 2008 3:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
well the coors field thing is really misunderstood
especially post humidor implementation.
here is a very well written article about it.
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/as-grab-holliday
when you see people pointing to his road numbers as a proxy for his true talent level, you should immediately reject the rest of their conclusions, because despite the ease of that kind of analysis, it simply isn’t accurate. You cannot just throw out Holliday’s performance in Colorado and pretend that it didn’t happen simply because the park is hitter friendly. Instead, the correct way to project his future performance is to adjust his past results to account for the park effects, and use the entire sample of data that we have.
Even with the move out of Coors Field and into pitcher friendly Oakland Coliseum, Holiday should be expected to be [at least] a .300/.380/.500 hitter. Considering he’s been both durable and a quality defensive outfielder, that makes him something like a +4 win player for 2009.
I recall when Soriano got traded from the yanks to the rangers people were projecting 50-50 seasons because of “park effects” he actually had his two worst seasons there. But he had pronounced huge HOME splits, so when he was traded from texas to the hitters graveyard that was RFK many pundits projected horrible decline in AVG/Power. Yet he had his best season ever (or one of them).
Texas is actually almost as a big (in some years its worse) as coors field in home splits in favor of hitters, since the humidor got implemented.
Now oaklands offense was the worst in the AL, but the Rockies was about 15th in all of baseball, and Oakland was in the 20s. With adding holliday, a full season of Thomas (is he still there), some improvement from Buck, maybe the acquisition of some other decent free agents, could push this offense toward the middle of the AL. So it is not like the Rockies offense was producing a ridiculous amount of runs.
In the end I think your looking at a guy who is going to bat .300+ with a near .400 obp and a low 500 slg, and by the way he also stole 28 bases and only got caught twice last year thats a 93% rate, extremely valuable, even for a team that doesnt run that much, when he does run he makes it.
The bigger question is, who else needs to be brought in for this move to make some sense?
Check out my baseball analysis blog FANalytics
by jbluestone on Nov 11, 2008 5:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Im sure I'm repeating people but,
I don’t really like this trade. Holliday is a great player no doubt, but his stats may be Coors inflated. What gets me though is the years on his contract and I just don’t think that this will really make the A’s a World Series team next year.
I think Carlos will be something special and it is sad to see him go. I just think it is a lot to pay for a one year guy.
Possibility they just get him to trade at the all star break, which would be weird but it could get us a nice prospect or two.
by JamesCaprio on Nov 10, 2008 2:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
see the above
Check out my baseball analysis blog FANalytics
by jbluestone on Nov 11, 2008 5:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There's a difference between saying that
Holliday’s stats are inflated by Coors, and pointing to Holliday’s road stats.
Holliday’s stats ARE inflated by Coors. BUT, simply using road stats, and throwing out what happened in Coors isn’t a good idea either. Those games, against MLB pitchers, in MLB games happened in Coors. Unless Holliday was using a metal bat or something like that there’s no reason to throw them out.
So, it’s better to just use a stat that does park adjustment, such as OPS+ or EQA.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on Nov 11, 2008 6:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Fantasy Expert
A fantasy expert on Espn.com projected .321 30 hrs 115 rbi’s 10 stolen bases in the colliseum…take that as you will
by yawedout21 on Nov 10, 2008 2:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
He stole 28 bases last year, caught twice
He was one of the top 10 baserunners in baseball last season. Anyone who steals at that success rate will have a green light even on the A’s.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rockies
Rockies attempted 70 more steals then the A’s last season…not saying I completely agree with the numbers but he will see a reduction from last year and it is proven fact the A’s dont run that much…Id love if they ran more
by yawedout21 on Nov 10, 2008 3:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The A's were actually a smallball team last season
Not by much, but they attempted quite a few sacrifices and steals.
I don’t expect Holliday will be asked to bunt too often, but I see no reason why Geren would rein him in on the basepaths.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the rockies attempted 70 more last year and plus the A's hate giving up outs on the base paths
by yawedout21 on Nov 10, 2008 3:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But Holliday doesn't (hardly) make outs on the base paths
The A’s don’t run much because typical success rates are actually bad for total runs scored. 26/28 is good for runs scored, so we should let him run.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 3:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I wont disagree they should let him run but they wont…I mean who besides rajai davis had the green light last year?
by yawedout21 on Nov 10, 2008 3:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Who besides Rajai Davis had Holliday's baserunning skill?
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 3:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rajai Davis is a better baserunner/basestealer than Holliday
Make you a deal if he breaks 25 ill give you 25 you were rights
by yawedout21 on Nov 10, 2008 3:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Besides?
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Nov 10, 2008 3:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
hard to tell
I’d say that Sweeney and Gonzlez had some good baserunning skill…I just think its hard to tell when they dont do much on the basepaths as a team…Again Ill say it the Rockies attempted 70 more steals last season then the A’s did…That is a lot more action on the basepaths
by yawedout21 on Nov 10, 2008 3:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Rockies had Taveras...
Take him out of the picture and replace him with an average speed guy and the Rockies would have attempted probably ~20 more steals than the A’s. INSIGNIFICANT.
www.punditpolitics.com - Political IQ Tests, Pundit Blog, News and Opinion.
by ChadGod on Nov 10, 2008 9:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Likely wont break 20 with the A's
I’d love it if he did but I watch the A’s play and they sit around on the basepaths…Id love to see more sacrifices and steals…The opened it up a lil bit last year and I think that was out of necessity because the offense was so dang bad
by yawedout21 on Nov 10, 2008 3:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd love to see more sacrifices as well
that’s why I am a big fan of ulama. I wish that would bring back the old rules though.
by Future Ed on Nov 10, 2008 3:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
well that and hes never broken 20 in any other season either
so to expect it in general is probably not realistic, but he has demonstrated the ability to steal a lot of bases without getting caught, so “money ball” wouldnt be against him running.
Check out my baseball analysis blog FANalytics
by jbluestone on Nov 11, 2008 5:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
28/30, actually
Going by the rule of thumb that 1 CS cancels 3 SB, that’s +22 SB or about 6 offensive runs from steals.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Lew: I don't want to set the world on fire
I just want to start raising funds for a new park.
Appropriate post-Apocalypse theme
Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.
by Joey C. on Nov 10, 2008 3:01 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I like your thought
I didn’t like the deal at first, but after looking at all the talks here, I believe your right! The real gamble here is CarGon, Street and Smith is totally replaceable. Lets say Holiday didn’t help us contend in 09, we can always sell him before the deadline, and get some good kids back.
If! ONLY if !! CarGon turns into the next Beltran, we would be looking silly.
But after all these years we are finally looking at NOW!
by danquadtwo on Nov 10, 2008 3:02 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
exactly
and if these furcal hopes turn out to be true it would really be looking at now…
by yawedout21 on Nov 10, 2008 3:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
CarGon played like a rookie last year
Check that — he played like a rookie that most teams would never have considered bringing up so soon. Someone explain to me how he looked so bad … just seems like the prognosis went from “promising, potential All-Star” to “bust” almost overnight. He looked awfully good to me — raw, yes — but pretty darn good.
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
by Vacafan on Nov 10, 2008 3:08 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Dude, if his prognosis was "bust" there's no way he'd be getting traded for Matt Holliday
He still has a ton of potential, it’s just a question of whether he reaches it.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you, PT
That’s why we’re all saying that he’s the biggest loss in this deal. No one is calling him a bust. Hell, he could still turn into Carlos Beltran but the plate discipline thing has always concerned me.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Nov 10, 2008 3:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So, PT. You were vocally against trading for Holliday in earlier posts
Whaddya think of the deal? Just curious.
This.
by Blicks on Nov 10, 2008 3:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not a big fan
I think the added probability of making the playoffs with this signing is not sufficient to justify giving up the talent package that they did. I think they could have obtained 90% of the production for 75% of the cost with someone like Dunn or Burrell.
That said, it’s not the end of the world.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
with this trade*
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
don't you ever get sick of waiting
It’s like the warriors, it’s always next year. Probably a bad comparison given the recent success the A’s have had this decade but it’s nice to have a big time player on our team. I’m even pumped the A’s have a fantasy first rounder. Cargon was a small price to pay for the big league club. Buck, Holliday, and Sweeny will be just fine in the outfield and our entire lineup will be better with the presence of Holliday. Look at the dodgers with Manny.. I’m not saying we will be as good as the dodgers were but definitely better. So, after all my ramblings my only point is it’s nice to have an all-star on the squad
by Spidz34 on Nov 10, 2008 3:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
(drops cow from the rafters)
"I have more questions after these."-WaddellCanseco
by Gaijin_Suketto on Nov 10, 2008 7:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dammit Jack Cust just landed on my house
"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox
by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 10, 2008 10:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd blame PaulThomas
and his lack of piloting skills, but apparently it’s a sensitive topic..
"God doesn't pay attention to your cute little hypotheticals." -- Jeff from LL
by oblique on Nov 10, 2008 11:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
it’s nice to have an all-star on the squad
every team gets at least one of those. woo, i’m glad we gave up two valuable players so holliday can replace duke at the all star game!
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 10, 2008 11:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You know
I kind of agree, in that objectively speaking I can’t say it’s a great trade. Seems like a so-so deal to make, at best.
But if you ignore that for a second….Matt Holliday is a pretty sweet ballplayer. And now he’s on the A’s. Fun change of pace, if nothing else. (And we keep Anderson and Cahill, to boot.)
RagingHarden: Yeah if you get 20 starts out of me I'll be shocked. Like, I'll wreck my drawers.
by walk off bunt on Nov 10, 2008 4:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
One point I'm sure Beane would make
is that he got a very, very good hitter, still in his prime, without giving up any of our good pitching prospects, who are the real core of the team to come.
And the best player we gave in the deal plays the position with 10 players on the 40-man roster.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on Nov 10, 2008 5:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's pretty much what I think.
This.
by Blicks on Nov 10, 2008 4:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No, I hear ya
no one’s calling him a bust … I just thought he was much more valuable than two draft picks after next season — which is what it looks like we’ll get for him in the long run.
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
by Vacafan on Nov 10, 2008 3:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus a year of Holliday
You can’t completely ignore the value of adding a pretty good hitter for a year. While it might have very little value if the A’s don’t make any other moves, if this is the first step to a play-off run this year then you could make an argument that a year of Holliday is pretty valuable.
Right now I’m still not completely sold on this deal, but there is a chance Holliday help the team contend in 2009 even if he isn’t extended.
by DiegoAsFan on Nov 10, 2008 9:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
holliday for a year +two draft picks… a year earlier!
but maybe beane knows the 2010 draft class is way better than 2011’s…
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 10, 2008 11:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There was no way Street was sticking around long enough to net the A's draft picks
The monster at the end of this blog.
by grover on Nov 11, 2008 7:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
okay, but then the a’s would be trading him with the other team understanding that they could get 2 draft picks for him in 2011.
street’s value is still “2 years of a pretty good closer + 2 compensation picks”.
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 11, 2008 11:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't remember what it's like to NOT be rebuilding
I don’t know what to expect next season
by NateHST on Nov 10, 2008 3:10 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Is there any chance we'll flip Holliday?
I haven’t seen that possibility mentioned. Couldn’t we still trade him to one of the other teams who wanted him, and get a 3B or SS plus prospects or something?
"I'm going to take a camera crew and march into Billy Beane's office and demand to know why instituting his newfangled cost-saving measures means that the run manufacturing plant had to get shut down." FJM
by Elvez on Nov 10, 2008 3:14 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
But I’m guessing if the A’s are going to flip him, it won’t be until the trading deadline and the A’s have failed to be competitive in the AL West in 2009 AND it appears like there is no chance to re-sign him to a long-term deal. I don’t see them flipping him immediately. It wouldn’t make much sense.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Nov 10, 2008 3:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I doubt they would flip him but there is always a possibility
The Cards wanted him and my question is, can the A’s get a ton of value from the cards in that trade?
Beside Rasmus who else would we want that they would consider trading for Holliday?
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Nov 10, 2008 5:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Wallace
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 5:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I hadn't even thought about that...
If the A’s are contending next year at the deadline, they can keep him and make a run. If not. They could flip him to the Cards or somebody for a guy like Wallace. There’s no way I see them trading him soon, they could have just done a 3-way. Who knows… This trade is mind boggling as is
by NateHST on Nov 10, 2008 6:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Jon Jay
Totally a Beane player. Not toolsy at all, but the man can put up the numbers.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 8:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hard to be very toolsy when you're several centuries dead.
He probably can’t even stink for power anymore.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 10:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
And Kotchman will be in the top 10 of them, once you count his defense.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 9:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
if you guys are worried about cf
and are not sold on sweeney/cunningham/denorfia/davis etc
A’s have been trying to get crisp for 2-3 yrs now they have enough ammo for him…i’m guessing it wouldnt take much
Rosenthal says Nats are showing interest in cargon who could still be traded again
you better believe, beane will then inquire about his favorite lastings milledge if that happens
by Asfan4ever723 on Nov 10, 2008 3:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Crisp is pretty ass-tastic, I'd rather play Sweeney out there even if he was free...
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather put Cust in CF
"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox
by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 10, 2008 6:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ya what's Crisp got that Rajai hasn't got?
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 7:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
His own cereal
"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox
by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 10, 2008 10:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Erroneous! ERRONEOUS!
Crisp was born after the cereal was made.
by mikev on Nov 10, 2008 10:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, sorry...let me try again.
"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox
by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 10, 2008 10:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A vagina?
"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox
by Gallagher's Watermelons on Nov 10, 2008 10:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He's a man, baby!
The monster at the end of this blog.
by grover on Nov 10, 2008 11:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Crisp is stale...
"I have more questions after these."-WaddellCanseco
by Gaijin_Suketto on Nov 10, 2008 7:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lasting?
he didnt leave a lasting impression last year with the Nats
i think BB is thinking less of him as a potential star now
by Wreckonized on Nov 10, 2008 3:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There are a lot of guys who Beane WAS very interested in getting.
Youkilis, Nady, Giles, etc.
Doesn’t mean he still wants them now.
"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk
by iglew on Nov 10, 2008 4:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd want Youkilis and Giles now. Nady not really with Holliday.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 5:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I love watching Youkilis play...
I don’t care what laundry he’s wearing…
"I have more questions after these."-WaddellCanseco
by Gaijin_Suketto on Nov 10, 2008 7:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How 'bout Jeremy Reed?
"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk
by iglew on Nov 11, 2008 2:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure the more the merrier
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 11, 2008 6:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
September 2008
I think Cunningham went way up in standing, and Cargon commensurately down.
CGonzales has that “Beltran” potential, but potential is only worth so much comparing one player to another.
Officially awaiting the 2009 season.
by One won lost won on Nov 10, 2008 3:21 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Beltran has Beltran potential too, and I'm still waiting for him to reach it
Boy was he ever something in that NLCS with Houston.
by DiegoSegui on Nov 10, 2008 7:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Beltran is a top 3 CF in baseball
How much higher does he have to reach?
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 8:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But he's the highest paid, so he's needs to be Top 1
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 8:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Meh
The two guys in front of him will be higher paid when they hit free agency.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 9:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He is top 1,
if only barely.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on Nov 10, 2008 10:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If they turn around and sign him long term, awesome!
I expect they will.
Everything we’ve heard about the A’s is that Wolff is willing to spend the money on the right players, and Holliday is certainly the right player. He’s the right player even if his numbers take a small dip by moving parks, but I think he’s a good enough hitter to minimize any potential drop. 35 to 30 homers? I’ll take it!
If they don’t re-sign him, then it was a crappy deal because 2009 is not the year when they should be going for broke, but again, I think Wolff and Beane et al. are in it to significantly change the team for the better by spending a little money and working with the system.
by RenoTy on Nov 10, 2008 3:23 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I just read that Holliday probably wouldn't sign long term anywhere before FA.
here: http://blogs.trb.com/sports/baseball/blog/2008/11/transaction_analysis_matt_holl.html
Shoot. I don’t like it, if that’s the case.
by RenoTy on Nov 10, 2008 3:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We'll see
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 3:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, in the links today they said that Holliday talked to Beane and Forst for awhile. He may be open for a long term deal with an up and coming team.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Nov 10, 2008 5:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If I'm Holliday
I’d take 6/120 now before my Oakland Coliseum numbers kick in (they’ll be great, but not as great).
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 7:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
His contract might be the big loser in this...or might not if he puts up big numbers anyway
He actually might make money if he’s shown to not be a Coors construction. OTOH if his numbers are superficially worse, we might be able to sign him. OTOOH if his numbers are worse he may hate hitting in Oakland. OK I’m out of hands now.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 7:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Boras S.O.P.
"If I've got baggage, he's got a whole set of Louis Vuitton." ~ Milton Bradley on Barry Bonds
by UncleLeo on Nov 10, 2008 8:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You got the acronym backwards
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Nov 10, 2008 9:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Forgive me for bringing up law school again
but am I the only one amused by the fact that Statute of Limitations and Scope of Liability both abbreviate as “SOL”?
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 9:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My doctor once referred me for a bunch of tests
with a prescription that read “Nico…SOB.” Only after I decked him did the receptionist inform me that it stood for “short of breath”.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Nov 10, 2008 9:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice cover... I'm surprised you fell for it.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 10:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You forgot the third one...
…Shit Outta Luck.
"If I've got baggage, he's got a whole set of Louis Vuitton." ~ Milton Bradley on Barry Bonds
by UncleLeo on Nov 10, 2008 10:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 11, 2008 12:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How do you sleep at night?
Ryan Sweeney: I probably irrationally embraced him before you did.
by Joey C. on Nov 11, 2008 9:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
For the A's SOL is
struck out looking
"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk
by iglew on Nov 11, 2008 1:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL!!! I ain't arguin'.
"If I've got baggage, he's got a whole set of Louis Vuitton." ~ Milton Bradley on Barry Bonds
by UncleLeo on Nov 10, 2008 10:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Great Trade,
even though I don’t think that the acquisition of Holliday will put them in contention for the playoffs in 2009. The infield is mediocre defensively, Chavez will get hurt 10 games into the season and still get paid $11 million, and the pitching staff is too inexperienced. I don’t think there’s any way that Beane resigns him to a long-term deal because, frankly, the A’s don’t keep stars (not to mention it isn’t exactly most peoples dream to play in the Coliseum or, for that matter, the city of Oakland). They make stars and they give them away. But if the A’s are contending at the end of the season, the can keep him and let him walk during winter, and take their consolation draft pick, or whatever it’s called. If they aren’t contending in July, they can deal him for draft picks and/or some very talented prospects.
Go Bears!
by RollOnYouBears667 on Nov 10, 2008 3:24 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Mediocre defensively?
I’m wondering how you get that impression, because just about every defensive stat around suggests that the A’s have a very good defensive team.
by MrIncognito on Nov 10, 2008 3:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I meant offensively. You’re right about the defensive side.
Go Bears!
by RollOnYouBears667 on Nov 10, 2008 3:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm just wondering, what is most people's dream?
Cause I can hardly remember mine from last night?
"Not in your wildest alcoholic nightmare would you ever imagine such events unfolding!" Bill King
by Buck Turgidson on Nov 10, 2008 7:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
BB see an opening in the AL west
if the Angels are not able to agree to terms with Tex and CC and they are losing K-Rod.
BB sees that his team have a chance to reclaim the AL west and possibly go deeper into the Playoff and bring October baseball back to Oakland.
this could possibly mean more deals to get this offense swinging and contend for the WS
by Wreckonized on Nov 10, 2008 3:30 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
If this is true,
and the Angels lose more than they gain this offseason, then maybe I like this trade.
Otherwise, it’s trade chips inefficiently spent.
"I have more questions after these."-WaddellCanseco
by Gaijin_Suketto on Nov 10, 2008 7:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
if the angels lose out on tex, cc, and k-fraud
they will just sign 1-2 other top free agents, or maybe make a trade like the a’s just did.
no way they just decide to not spend money.
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 11, 2008 12:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Im a Giambi lover
but I have trouble seeing how he would fit, now that he’d essentially be full time first base.
Save Rajai Davis
by oakinboston on Nov 10, 2008 3:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
DH?
or he could replace jack cust at DH
by Wreckonized on Nov 10, 2008 3:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Then where does Cust play?
RF?
And if Cust/Holliday are the corner OF, where do Buck/Cunningham play?
We can’t sign Giambi except as a 1B, and I don’t think he’d be a smart signing in that context.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 3:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
this has been beat into the ground, but maybe you missed it.
He is not an improvement over Cust at DH.
Giambi OPS+
2007: 108
2008: 128
Cust
2007: 147
2008: 132
Save Rajai Davis
by oakinboston on Nov 10, 2008 3:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
higher avg and not reliable fielder at first?
by Wreckonized on Nov 10, 2008 3:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
im having trouble figuring out who you are talking about
but when you say “higher avg” it makes me think that’s probably a good thing.
Save Rajai Davis
by oakinboston on Nov 10, 2008 3:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I saw an exchange between Geren and CarGon
During the last week of the season or something.. Somebody had nocked Gonzales in, and when he was headed down the steps Geren greeted him with a stiff “You see a green light on 3-?”
And Gonazales just rolled his eyes and marched past.
I wonder if the coaches were having a hard time communicating with him, and that made him a bit expendable..
Ellis for President
by tosk on Nov 10, 2008 3:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Good Point
Something I was wondering about myself. This is one of those negative “intangibles” that rarely get factored into analyses. If CarGon was a bad fit for the A’s, or someone who didn’t pay attention to coaches or managers, his value as a member of the team declined, and he needed to be traded.
PT’s analysis of the Angels a few weeks ago indicated they’re extremely catchable. If Beane & Forst come up with the same conclusions, then the addition of a quality hitter makes sense.
The A’s could compete in 2008 IF Chavez comes roaring back, Barton and Buck start realizing their potential as hitters, Eveland and Gallagher start realizing their potential as pitchers, and Cahill and/or Anderson make the same kind of jump to the majors as Zito and Hudson did in their day. Lots of ifs here, but not impossible.
by richwol1 on Nov 10, 2008 3:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They'll for sure need to add more than Holliday.
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Nov 10, 2008 3:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Say, Furcal and Dunn?
Deal Crosby to the Tigers for whatever the hell they’ll give up, sign Furcal to a 2/30 with a 3rd option year if necessary, and give Dunn a 4/60 deal to play 1B
Send Barton down to play 3B, then bring him up once Chavez falls apart.
SS Furcal
CF Sweeney
DH Cust
LF Holliday
1B Dunn
3B Chavez
2B Ellis
RF Buck/Cunningham
by mikev on Nov 10, 2008 3:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Would be nice
But I doubt we can sign both of them. As sad as it is for me to say, my shameless flogging of the Adam Dunn to the A’s fan club might now be over.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 3:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Derek Lowe would be a better sign than Dunn in this scenario
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 3:54 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Furcal best of all though, so we might as well focus all our hoping on that until it happens.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Nov 10, 2008 3:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
KEEP YOUR BOSTON FILTH OUTTA HERE, DAMMIT
Unless, of course, he’s willing to sign a cheap contract. I wouldn’t mind Lowe in the rotation at all.
He DOES have that awful Red Sox stigma with him, though.
by mikev on Nov 10, 2008 4:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Does that mean you're offended or that you want to improve the offense?
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 5:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
But I assume you mean 2009, right? Cause they really didn’t compete well in 08 ;-)
by Tyler Bleszinski on Nov 10, 2008 4:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good point
I also see Clinton beating Giuliani in the 2008 presidential election.
by richwol1 on Nov 10, 2008 5:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
about 40 seconds into this
is how i feel about the trade
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJFHvCo6RtI
BB should send scouts to watch cricket players.
by alea iacta est on Nov 10, 2008 3:43 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think you guys should trade for Beltre.
by lailaihei on Nov 10, 2008 4:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Who thinks CarGon will turn into the next Carlos Pena
in which the A’s gave up on him too early
McGwire belongs in the Hall so put him there
by streetisclosedin08 on Nov 10, 2008 4:15 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
If it takes CarGo 7 years to reach his potential like it did Pena, this is a FANTASTIC trade.
by mikev on Nov 10, 2008 4:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
True
Pena would have been a free agent already by the time he broke out.
Whether he was a minor league FA or a major league FA is fairly irrelevant.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 8:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It took Pena falling to the bottom of the barrel
with Tampa Bay before he righted himself. It wasn’t until this year that the team was good. When Pena wound up playing first for them, that was basically his last chance. Had he stayed with the A’s even for the 7/8 years it took him, I seriously doubt he’d be as good as he is now.
In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!
by DMOAS on Nov 10, 2008 6:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I seem to say this very often, so I'll just say it again
Pena was signed to a MINOR LEAGUE contract after the 2006 season. The A’s could have had him if they wanted him. Any team could have.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on Nov 10, 2008 10:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
And every team has given up on someone that became good – especially the Rays (Josh Hamilton).
"Some of the men didn't wait for the women and children to jump off the sinking ship that is our season." - 67MARQUEZ
by notsellingjeans on Nov 11, 2008 1:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm so confused!
Why are we getting the big-name player instead of losing him? Why is Carlos, the much-heralded five-tool player that Fosse loved to say we’d be watching play in an A’s uniform for years to come, now going to the Rockies? Just when I think I have Billy figured out, he goes and does this.
As for Huston… I still love and will always love Huston. I wish he would’ve been given back his closer’s job last year, especially since he was pitching well again, and I would’ve loved for him to still be on the team in ‘09 because he is still awesome. But the good part about all the “Huston to [insert team here]” rumors is that this trade is not a complete shock to my system (see: Hudson, Mulder, Haren, Swisher). I will miss him, but this isn’t as painful as past trades (it helps that we’re getting a very good player)… oh, :P, I’m sad for you that you’re going to the Rockies (if that is where you end up), but you will always have a spot in my A’s heart. Farewell, Utter Hotness.
Also: does this mean we don’t get to call anyone “Greggles” anymore?
by whiteshoes40 on Nov 10, 2008 4:16 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
4 things this means
1. Chavez back is better and they expect him to be back next year
2. Holiday will be traded for another player
3. Carlos has to many holes in his swing
4. Beane is drunk
by Arcman on Nov 10, 2008 4:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
1. i hope
2. i doubt it
3. yes
4. it’s possible
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
by flipgatey3 on Nov 10, 2008 7:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Arcman, your point about Chavez
totally jumped out at me as something I really hadn’t thought of yet.
I think you’ve got a great and interesting point there- for the A’s to be adding somebody like Holliday now (unless they’re just scheming to trade him at the deadline or seriously think they can re-sign him) for 2009 probably means they’re convinced (not hopeful, but convinced) Chavez will be back and ready to play 3B again.
Now that would be a reason to start getting more optimistic about 2009- Holliday AND a healthy Chavez at the hot corner…
by still bills kingdom on Nov 10, 2008 11:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What about all the other outfielders?
Just now heard about the Holliday thing and I think it’s good – but it still doesn’t solve the problem of too many outfielders: Sweeney, Buck, Davis, Cunningham, Denorfia, and now Holliday. So I imagine another one will go in another trade. Just don’t let it be Sweeney!
by sacto on Nov 10, 2008 4:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Denorfia and Davis don't count, they're basically free agents or useless
McGwire belongs in the Hall so put him there
by streetisclosedin08 on Nov 10, 2008 4:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't call Davis useless.
He’s insanely fast and he’s fantastic defensively in CF.
He’s a really good 24th/25th guy on a roster. Defensive sub, pinch runner, etc.
by mikev on Nov 10, 2008 4:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like Davis too
just because he is so freakin fast.
You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}
by micdog2001 on Nov 10, 2008 4:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't call Denorfia useless
but I’m hardly objective on this subject.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Nov 10, 2008 8:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
PMR has Davis as the BEST defensive CF in baseball
That is very, very valuable, even though some of Pinto’s numbers this year are a bit quirky looking.
by thejd44 on Nov 11, 2008 1:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
funny
rockies may not even keep cargon/street
i’m okay with the deal, but beane call them back and get a 3b/SS in a separate deal
by Asfan4ever723 on Nov 10, 2008 4:22 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I knew I should have worn my A's cap instead of my Sharks cap today.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2008 4:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Lesson Learned
ALWAYS WEAR YOUR A’S HAT!!!!!
by yawedout21 on Nov 11, 2008 1:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Haren + Street for Holliday, Anderson, Eveland, Carter, and Cunningham.
Smith + CarGon are basically 2 of the 6 guys we got for Haren. We still have Eveland who is equal and slightly better than Smith, Anderson, Carter, and Cunningham who may turn out to be a decent player. So the trade basically worked out to be Haren + Street for Holliday, Anderson, Eveland, Carter, and Cunningham.
Would you make that trade? I would in a heart beat.
by asfansince1989 on Nov 10, 2008 4:41 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Interesting perspective
But I agree with you.
Procrastinators unite....tomorrow
by muffinpryde on Nov 10, 2008 7:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
sorry, but that makes no sense
because the a’s already traded haren for cargon, smith, anderson, eveland, carter, cunningham.
two separate events.
if the a’s traded eveland for brian bocock tomorrow, that wouldn’t be acceptable just because the overall haren trade was still a positive.
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 11, 2008 12:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You'd think mlb.com would have tons of pictures to choose from
and yet they go with these. Although they do kind of fit: Holliday is trying to rip that Rockies uniform off (because he wants to come to the A’s) and Huston is angry, like he was much of ’08…
by whiteshoes40 on Nov 10, 2008 4:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I like Huston in the 1968 uniform. It's like he's Billy Martin or something,
even though Billy wasn’t on the 1968 A’s.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 5:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Another way to look at the FA resignability issue for Holliday
If we doubt that Holliday will be with the A’s in 2010, we can think about if we see Smith/Street/Cargon being with the A’s in 2010. Smith I think is unlikely, we have too much talent coming up in 2009-2010. Street may even be bumped, or at least traded in some minor deal, we won’t get much for him. CarGon has a good chance to be part of A’s long term plan. But equally we have a good chance to be competitive in2009 with Holliday. if we are not competitive and don’t look good resigning him, then we trade him in for someone we can use in the long term, maybe another CarGon level prospect, maybe 1-2 year behind CarGon in terms of development. In that case I don’t we really haven’t lost anything significant at all.
by asfansince1989 on Nov 10, 2008 4:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Exciting trade
Good post, Blez and always interesting comments from AN. I’m still a bit shocked that something like this happened and happened early.
Can’t help but think of those last games in Oakland when the crowd boo’ed Street. Somebody, Skigurl?, was saying those might be the last times we saw him in Oakland in an A’s uni.
Glad it is across league trade.
I like Gonzalez a lot, but I can start liking Holliday very easily.
Go A’s!
"And sometimes, when it seems like all hope is gone, Life tosses you a special gift of a baseball game" . 7/10/08 BaseBallGirl headline
by LongTimeFan on Nov 10, 2008 4:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
RE: signing Holliday
After the 2001 season, the A’s offered Giambi a 6/$91M contract [~$15.2 per season]. He was also already a liability at 1B, a poor base-runner, and he was going to be 31 on opening day. If Giambi accepted, it would have been structured in such a way that the A’s would have likely been paying him around a quarter of the payroll by the end of the deal.
Holliday is two years younger than Giambi, healthier, and a plus defender [and almost the opposite of guys like Cust, Dunn, or Burrell, for that matter]. Oh, and he was 28-for-30 in steal attempts last year. I don’t understand why this gets overlooked. I know the A’s aren’t the runningest of teams, but that at least shows he’s a smart baserunner, and points to him being a smart player overall.
So, if the A’s were serious about keeping Giambi until he was 36, I don’t see why Holliday couldn’t be worked into the payroll.
"This is Rickey, calling on behalf of Rickey."
by scatterbrian on Nov 10, 2008 5:03 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
times have changed, Holliday would laugh at 6/$91M
my guess is it would take 7/$130 to keep him around
McGwire belongs in the Hall so put him there
by streetisclosedin08 on Nov 10, 2008 5:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
if he can make the A's competitive in 09
then I think he’ll be worth every penny. If his number falls off drastically due to ball park adjustment, we basically took a bad gamble. But still we didn’t risk any of our core guys who are going to be around for long after 2010, except for maybe CarGon.
I like the fact that the A’s took this risk and trying to make the team fun to watch, and not just sitting on our pile of prospects, twiddling their thumbs, and keep repeating “just wait till 2010”
by asfansince1989 on Nov 10, 2008 5:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can understand your point of view asfaisince1989, however, I want more than fun to watch. To me, if the A’s do not sign Holliday to a contract extension, then I will be quite upset. Imagine having a Holliday in his prime, two to three years from now when Cahill, Anderson, Gio Gonzalez, Mazzaro, and _ are pitching. I salivate at the future if we can sign Holliday to a big contract without crippling our ability to pay all the other studs who are due.
My religion is A'slamic.
by WhoNeedsReligionWhenYaGotBaseball on Nov 10, 2008 5:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
True, don't want to break the bank
we still want to be able to pay all the other young guys when they get good.
My point is that, even if we didn’t trade for Holliday, the list of young studs that you see being the core of the team in 2010-2011, they don’t include Street, Smith, and maybe or maybe not CarGon.
in that sense, what have we lost that is so significant for the long term? not much. Our MLB team will look roughly the same in 2010-2011 if we traded Holliday but can’t resign him, or if we didn’t trade for him.
In the mean time we get a much more competitive team in 09, and get 1st crack at signing Holliday for the long term.
by asfansince1989 on Nov 10, 2008 5:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't want to pay all the other young guys when they get good.
Who’s that good anyway? Cahill and Anderson are pitchers. 6.5 years of them is plenty. If they turn into Maddux and Glavine we’ll find the money for them. Who else is so good that you want to pay him, and will be expensive within seven years? Carter is 2+ years away.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 7:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't mean that 6/$91 would get it done
just that Beane has shown a willingness to allocate 25% of the payroll to one player. If the A’s are saying they can go up to $80M in payroll next year, they could afford to sign Holliday.
"This is Rickey, calling on behalf of Rickey."
by scatterbrian on Nov 10, 2008 7:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And in a way, they can't afford not to -
in that they can’t expect to compete seriously, for years, without paying a lot for a great player instead of paying some for a good player.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Nov 10, 2008 7:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Scott?
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2008 7:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
they can't rely on just outsmarting everyone year in and year out
considering the rise in Anaheim’s payroll over the last six years or so, the A’s have to be a little more competitive financially.
"This is Rickey, calling on behalf of Rickey."
by scatterbrian on Nov 10, 2008 8:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Who have we outsmarted the last two years?
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver