Organizational Rule #1: Never Hire Your Best Man
Macha was too aloof, too cold, too Machanical. Geren is too friendly, too positive. Our clubhouse is "fractured." Our boys certainly are not afraid to air their views---just afraid to attach their names to them. What a farce! We are losing because we just don't have the players, and the players we did have have either moved on or been traded away.
One thing is clear, however. Beane committed one of the great cardinal sins in any organization. You NEVER hire a good friend to fit into a position of power. First, if the good friend messes up, it's hard to call him on it. Second, if you do call him on it, or fire him, you lose the friend. Third, if you don't call him on it, it looks like cronyism, and your employees are all pissed off. Pissed off employees take out their pique by cutting down their production. They don't want to get fired, exactly, but they certainly don't want to make the boss (the friend) look good.
Beane is a smart guy, but he is foolish sometimes, just like all of us. He tried to pretend that losing Zito, Thomas and Payton was just, uh, "reloading"; when that certainly proved false, he abandoned this season by letting Kendall and Bradley go. OK---fair enough. I like Murphy, I like Scutaro, I even like the Furry Maniac. But, we were not a strong team before and we are not a strong team now. Add to this the acrid smell of "friendship." Nothing curdles friendship faster than a loan that is not paid back, or a job done badly, or failure, no matter whose fault it is. Beane should have hired someone who really was the best man for the job, not just his Best Man. Anybody, really. Hate to say it, I liked Macha---he was exactly the kind of guy to oversee the frat house clubhouse we have had. Professorial, distant, maybe. We can argue about him---but you certainly don't hire a buddy. That's like painting a bullseye on the guy's butt.
0 recs |
22 comments
Comments
I agree about Geren
All along I've believed it was likely that at some point their personal relationship would interfere with their professional relationship.
by kaweahkaweah on Aug 7, 2007 2:59 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
and that has been demonstrated ... how(e)?
(I don't mean anything occult by that "e," just preempting the puns.)
by monkeyball on Aug 7, 2007 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't say it has
but I still expect some sort of problems to arise.
by kaweahkaweah on Aug 7, 2007 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Organizational Rule #1
Your team MUST HAVE TALENT, no matter who the manager is.
by theblackpearl on Aug 7, 2007 3:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yep
Geren is not the A's problem, the crappy players and the lack of viable alternatives in the farm system are the problem.
by BlameChannel53 on Aug 7, 2007 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've painted a bullseye on
many a guy's butt, and it is NOT similar. Maybe it would be if I got their permission first, I don't know.
by Nico on Aug 7, 2007 4:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Clubhouse is fractured? Is that why Travis Buck
couldn't get the brace he needed?
by theblackpearl on Aug 7, 2007 4:25 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Organizational Rule #1
It's never actually the manager's fault.
But he will be blamed for it anyway by credulous fanbois who don't realize this central truth.
Seriously, where was this carping backbiting when the A's were 8 games over .500 in mid-June? Was Geren a much better manager then? If you want to vent, vent about the players. It may still be unfair to them, but at least they exercise a statistically significant influence upon the outcome.
by PaulThomas on Aug 7, 2007 4:29 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
nice post...
I don't think there was much talk about Geren when we were winning because there were no issues...but how a man handle adversity will tell a lot about that man.
After the MB thing in mid-June, adversity in the clubhouse was brought to the forefront and Geren hasn't handled it appropriately.
I was told that Kendall told Geren to "go F#$k himself" after Geren denied that JK would start losing time to Suzuki. Telling a veteran like JK that he's going to be losing time when the youngster is brought up would be tough on any manager... however...When you deal with professionals in a way that the players themselves may deem as less than professional and blowing smoke up their ass because you're doing a "job" based upon being the "Best Man" and not the best man then it can hurt the clubhouse... especially when things are going bad.
I like the post....
The lack of talent definitely has something to do with the team now, but what is really different about the players the A's have now and the ones that were playing in mid-June?
by Erik being Erik on Aug 7, 2007 4:36 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The pitching has reverted to being mean, the
hitter who was carrying the team, returned to the AAAA slugger we all thought, and the bullpen has gotten tired. If Kendall did say that, then the manager tells the GM, and the player is gone. I don't think it has as much to do with how Geren is handling losing, it is how the crybaby players are handling it.
by theblackpearl on Aug 7, 2007 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think if Kendall knows the deal..
and the manager tries to act like nothing is going to change when EVERYONE in the clubhouse knows something is about to change, well, I think it can affect a manager's credibility.
I don't think they're crybabies because they don't think the situation is going well... but maybe you're right. All the frustration of losing and confusion about the clubhouse has the team complaining a little more than they should, especially after playing pretty well til mid-June
by Erik being Erik on Aug 7, 2007 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see that as a GM decision, not a manager, Billy
is the one who calls players up,and he is the one who says, I'm bringing Kurt up to play more, so Kendall should have been pissed at Beane,not Geren.
by theblackpearl on Aug 7, 2007 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
100% agree with you...
but when it comes to breaking the news, the manager has to be real with his player, especially if he is considered one of the clubhouse leaders.
by Erik being Erik on Aug 7, 2007 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
sometimes, there's a man ...
I won't say a hero, 'cause, what's a hero? Sometimes, there's a man.
by monkeyball on Aug 7, 2007 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's interesting about Geren's
in-game strategy is that back when the A's were overachieving, I also thought his moves were outstanding for the most part. Most of the moves I have disagreed with have come more recently--over the past two months--as has the A's lack of success.
I'm not suggesting cause and effect or correlation, but my recent increased criticism of Geren's managing (in game) is not related to the team's recent lack of success, but rather to an increase in decisions I just don't agree with.
by Nico on Aug 7, 2007 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He has had to think too much, as the team got
healthy, he has had more decisions to make.
by theblackpearl on Aug 7, 2007 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
If Kendall actually said this, I lose all respect for him. He was lucky not to have been cut from the team with the numbers he was putting up. He should have been HAPPY to play 3 times a week.
by PaulThomas on Aug 7, 2007 6:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't Misunderstand....
I'm not sure Geren is a good manager or not....and I don't think any manager can win with a mediocre team unless they get incredibly lucky, and/or play over-their-heads for an entire season. I just question whether it is a good organizational move to hire one of your dearest friends to be the manager. That guy, in a sense, can't win. If the team loses, it's because of cronyism and he hasn't got the stuff to be a manager. If the team wins, he had very little to do with it, except to be a cheerleader. Now, granted, with Beane micromanaging the team, any manager is pretty much a cypher (sp?), but to put your friend into such a position---well, there is something creepy about it.
by Buck18 on Aug 7, 2007 6:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Call Me Crazy
... but I thought Macha should have stayed, Thomas should have stayed, and Kendall should have stayed. Jermaine "I never won anything in Oakland" Dye should have stayed, at nearly any cost, in part because he was the only one I saw on an Open House who really seemed to enjoy himself with the fans. And he plays like a dream. Washington should have stayed, even if it meant favoring him over a favored man Best Man.
I could give two craps out the backside for Kotsay and Kielty. Especially Kotsay. Not them personally, as I don't know them and don't care. But for their talent and the disingenuous behavior of one.
Who should not have stayed:
Larry Davis
Kotsay (did I say that already?)
I like Suzuki just fine.
I imagine the clubhouse has changed, the finances have changed, the lure of a new ballpark has changed attitudes, and it'll be 3 years before we see a 95-win season. And when we do, Beane will be gone, Geren will be long gone, and the clubhouse big-mouths will find themselves in more-advantageous jobs elsewhere.
Talent will drain from this club over the next few years like a seeping wound: Street, Ellis and an underrated bullpen staff will slip away like stolen sailboats to better clubs in friendlier ports. And ANers will lament their loss at the tactical level, without bothering to comprehend the strategic implications.
//I know plenty of (most of) the AN Crew are far more intelligent than me about the club and its players and its game and its history, but right now, I don't care to know squat except what the frick is wrong with Chavez and why we retained him over Tejada.//
I'm pissed off at what's happened to this club and ringing the fire bell, although I'm in such a remote place I'm not sure who is around to hear. Maybe the bell is just in my head, and I need a cuppa tea and a lie-down.
And I'm really furious about what passes for the A's medical staff. Were they recruited from the worst VA hospital in the country? (I'm a vet so please don't dog me out for not knowing WTF the VA can sink to in terms of standards.) Did they go to medical school in Lower Buttswana? I have a minor data point about the A's referred medical staff: someone I know well had an elbow problem and saw a specialist the A's (and Raiders) use. Diagnosis: mis-diagnosis. It took one time trip back home to the Islands to figger out the problem. Maybe there should be a MedEvac flight to Honolulu every time an Athletic gets hurt. Here, they know injuries. Injuries-R-Us, down on Kapiolani, can fix what the fat-ass, jogging-to-the-infield lardbutts in the stadium can't comprehend. So much for East Bay pro sports doctors and their half-bright Coliseum monkeys.
While I'm ranting, I'm also still pissed off about the possessive apostrophe in the A's logo. What exactly are the "A's" possessing? A chance at last place?
Grammar, people, grammar. Please!
OK, that's my piece peace.
by Dan_Honolulu on Aug 7, 2007 8:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Sorry to nitpick
The apostrophe is not designating a possession, but it is demonstrating a contraction. Athletics shortened to A's.
Additionally, I agree that Larry Davis et al. need to go. Imagine what this team would be like with a competent medical staff. Maybe Harden would have started this evening.
by Archaeologist on Aug 7, 2007 9:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
effin hilarious!!!
some great reading...
by Erik being Erik on Aug 7, 2007 11:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the VA provides the best care in the US
The guy appointed by the previous POTUS totally turned the system around, and it's been the leading healthcare system in the country in terms of quality of care for several years.
And what Archaeologist said about the apostrophe.
by monkeyball on Aug 8, 2007 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















