Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Hugh Douglas Admits To Stealing From Jaguars

The Understudy

Watching the A’s lately I can’t help but think of one of my favorite Seinfeld episodes when Bette Midler is starring in Rochelle Rochelle on Broadway and George Costanza takes her out in a softball game at home plate.  I feel like we’ve been watching Bette’s understudy Gennice all season and I’m only now realizing it.

Don’t get me wrong, part of the reason that 2007 has been so fun so far is because these fill-ins have been exciting.  A new wrinkle to watching the same old season.  I mentioned how excited I was to see someone like Jack Cust get a chance.  Someone like Chris Snelling get a chance.  But there are only so many rabbits one can pull out of the hat.  You can’t continue to lose pitchers like Harden, Loaiza, Street, Calero (we lost Kiko a while ago – he’s just now admitting to the issue) and Duchscherer and expect to remain in contention forever.  The A’s, by Billy Beane’s own admission, live and die with their pitching.  The offense just needs to score a minimal number of runs for this team to win if the pitching is going right.  Problem is, that hasn’t been happening lately.

So while so many are focused on the shortcomings of the offense, I just think we’re starting to see what happens when the pitching starts to pitch as it probably should and not like the world beaters that they have been.  I don’t think anyone would argue that Chad Gaudin, Joe Kennedy and Lenny DiNardo were all pitching above their heads.  The team is now just feeling it.  It’s like the audience is suddenly realizing that it isn’t the fabulous Miss Bette on stage.

On the other hand, Joe Blanton and Danny Haren have been mostly awesome this year.  Haren had one of his worst outings yesterday and he only gave up three runs.  I can't even think about where this team would be if Haren had been mortal and Blanton wasn't pitching like a man possessed.

What remains to be seen is whether or not the A’s pitching can regain its form.  Can Gaudin get his early season magic back?  Are DiNardo and Kennedy doomed to continue seeing their ERAs rise?  Is the A’s bullpen going to continue to go nitro?  No Calero, Street or Duchscherer?  Casilla has been a revelation and Embree has mostly been lights out as a closer, but eventually someone is going to realize that the Trojan Horse is filled with people and none of them have Duke’s cutter, Calero’s slider or Street’s fastball.

The offense is a problem, but the offense was never going to be the reason this team won in 2007.  The pitching was.  And it seems to be slipping right now.

I leave you with some dialogue from that famous episode as we wait to see if Lenny DiNardo can stop the A's bleeding today:

Jerry: The Improv is playing "Rochelle Rochelle" The musical.

Kramer: Really? What is Bette Midler playing? Is she going to be there?

Jerry: She might be. She's the star of the show.

Kramer: Bette Midler is going to be in the park today? Yeeee. Jerry, don't tease me.

George: I didn't know you were such a Bette Midler fan.

Kramer: So maybe I'll go down there and watch, uh? She'll be there, maybe.

George: Gennice playing today?

Jerry: Yeah, maybe.

Kramer: Who's Gennice?

Jerry: That's the understudy. I'm dating her.

Kramer: Oh, uh, is this uh, Bette Midler's understudy?

Jerry: Yeah.

Kramer: Oh, understudies are a very shifty bunch. The substitute teachers of the theater world.

Comment 66 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Athletics Nation

Dr. Joey Fever

Feb 2008 by Tyler Bleszinski - 73 comments

Thursday Thoughts

Jan 2008 by Tyler Bleszinski - 36 comments

A Bird in the Hannahan

Aug 2007 by Tyler Bleszinski - 127 comments

Dare We Dream?

Jul 2007 by Tyler Bleszinski - 58 comments

Comments

Display:

Snelling

If you were excited to see him get a chance, I hope you enjoyed the week.  He just took time off his rehab assignment for the second time with continued soreness in the knee.  It's time to stop trumpeting Snelling or calling for his inclusion in the lineup.  He's just another continually injured player under the A's control.
As for the pitching, I couldn't agree more.  Last night didn't really depress me much because, with Alan Embree as the closer, it should be an expected occurrence.  The fact that last night was only his second blown save amazes me.  I still think the A's have gotten more out of Embree as closer than could have been expected.  

by IndianaAsfan on Jun 27, 2007 9:52 AM PDT reply actions  

I don't understand the love affair with Snelling

either.  Demonstrate, over at least a month, that he can do something positive to help the team and then I'll be behind him 100%.

by SwisherSweet33 on Jun 27, 2007 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

here, here.
I think religion is a neurological disorder that prevents people from thinking on their own.--B. Maher

by sf drift king on Jun 27, 2007 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

but he's WHITE!!!
But just because something can be plotted on an X and Y axis does not make it the whole truth. @('.')@

by monkeyball on Jun 27, 2007 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

no he's not...
he's sort of a peachish beige...

The only white people are mimes and goths... and gothic mimes...

"The problems in the world today are so enormous they cannot be solved with the level of thinking that created them."- A. Einstein

by The Pilots Dared Me To Die on Jun 27, 2007 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Alan Embree got smacked by Yankees

One of the appearances that was not a save chance, they took him to the woodshed.  It always seems like he gets a bunch of hard hit balls to the outfield.  If   they get caught, it's a save.  If not, it's a loss.

Not a GB pitcher, not a super strikeout pitcher...

by MobiusKlein on Jun 27, 2007 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

That's why

I'm surprised he's got an 80% save conversion rate.  I guess it's just a small sample size.  It concerns me going forward because it indicates there could be an increasing number of blown saves.

by IndianaAsfan on Jun 27, 2007 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hmmm

We could probably get an angry mob together, as in that episode. Who should we chase?

My last sig was about Doyle.

by mikeA on Jun 27, 2007 10:06 AM PDT reply actions  

"whom"

< /meaningless grammar pedantry >

But just because something can be plotted on an X and Y axis does not make it the whole truth. @('.')@

by monkeyball on Jun 27, 2007 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Don't encourage them, Monkeyball

It's comments like this that spook people into overcompensating and making the reverse error -- using "whom" when it should be "who" -- which is much much worse.

"...but we're also always open to hearing about other sandwiches if it can make our lunch better." -- Nico, channeling Billy Beane

by iglew on Jun 27, 2007 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Almost as jarring as...

"She wanted to talk to you and I."  Because people get spooked away from saying "you and me" after being scolded for saying "You and me should go to the store."

Don't worry, it's only a safety problem.

by Poppy on Jun 27, 2007 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

whom would do that?
But just because something can be plotted on an X and Y axis does not make it the whole truth. @('.')@

by monkeyball on Jun 27, 2007 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

When is Loaiza expected to return?

Our bullpen depth is really hurting now and it would be nice to be able to put Lenny back in the BP.

It's the bully that really has me concerned.  Besides Garcia, Embree, and maybe Flores I have zero faith in any of the other guys out there.  We certainly don't have the arms in there that we need.

by SwisherSweet33 on Jun 27, 2007 10:20 AM PDT reply actions  

The house of cards is about to be run over

by a cat chasing a superbounce ball

I think the Angels are the cat, but I can't come up with what the superbounce ball is supposed to represent.

Signatures? We don't need no stinking signatures.

by jubjub on Jun 27, 2007 10:54 AM PDT reply actions  

Isn't that supposed to be

a bouncing Superball??

Yes I agree.  Like most integrated systems, it works great until it doesn't.  Then it cascades into a vast non-performance.

Rename Fremont, CA, to Philadelphia, CA. "Philadelphia Athletics" will sound great.

by One won lost won on Jun 27, 2007 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

no, jubjub missed a space

that's supposed to be a "superb ounce ball"

But just because something can be plotted on an X and Y axis does not make it the whole truth. @('.')@

by monkeyball on Jun 27, 2007 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

eight eight-balls

is what killed John Belushi!

Don't let it happen to you!

"The problems in the world today are so enormous they cannot be solved with the level of thinking that created them."- A. Einstein

by The Pilots Dared Me To Die on Jun 27, 2007 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Reality Hurts

I have been watching A's games with my fingers crossed hoping the bullpen could somehow keep it together. Embree (despite last night) has given us more than we could have expected.

No team, and I mean NO TEAM, could survive the amount of injuries to their pitching staff that the A's have this season. It would be nice if everyone was healthy but that isn't the reality.

I do like seeing guys like Cust and Casilla get a chance. I think both have been nice additions to the team and I hope they stay the rest of the season.

I can well remember those horrible seasons in the late 1970's when the A's were the laughingstock of baseball. It helps me deal with this rough stretch they are going through.

by RudiFan on Jun 27, 2007 11:06 AM PDT reply actions  

Thanks for the perspective,

much appreciated.  The season is not over, though it looks realy bleak right now.  I still don't understand why noone in the media has called out larry davis for being a horrible 'trainer.'

How does that guy keep his job?

by SwisherSweet33 on Jun 27, 2007 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

because he'll write

a tell-all book about the steroid era if he gets fired, and that would be embarrassing.

"The problems in the world today are so enormous they cannot be solved with the level of thinking that created them."- A. Einstein

by The Pilots Dared Me To Die on Jun 27, 2007 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

that seems to me to be Nico's theory
But just because something can be plotted on an X and Y axis does not make it the whole truth. @('.')@

by monkeyball on Jun 27, 2007 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

interesting and quite possibly

valid.  Wow, I had never thought of that angle.

by SwisherSweet33 on Jun 27, 2007 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

okay I give up

I've been trying to post this in a diary for 30 minutes now, and I can't find the publish button anywhere. My heads going to explode. So here's a link from espn.com on a story written by Jeff Pearlman on Barry Zito. Basiclaly bashing him for changing who he used to be.

The interesting quote is

"Talk to former teammates and front office officials in Oakland, and several will quietly moan that, with time, Zito began to place too much emphasis on his own press clippings and Q rating."

Also, if someone wants to tell me what I'm doing wrong with the diaries, I'm all ears.

Thank You,

by WhatElse on Jun 27, 2007 11:16 AM PDT reply actions  

Is this Stomper?

I think you have to put a portion of your text in the extended diary section for it to work.  

I think religion is a neurological disorder that prevents people from thinking on their own.--B. Maher

by sf drift king on Jun 27, 2007 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

hmm

nope. No Stomper here.

I tried that, and when I would hit preview diary, it would just go back up into the intro.

I think I've been staring at the computer screen for too long to understand what I'm not doing.

Thanks for the help, though.

by WhatElse on Jun 27, 2007 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

The diary also must have at least one tag.

That's what I always forget.

Don't worry, it's only a safety problem.

by Poppy on Jun 27, 2007 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

Or

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.

plus the 300 character minimum. Other than that, not sure what it could be.

I think religion is a neurological disorder that prevents people from thinking on their own.--B. Maher

by sf drift king on Jun 27, 2007 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Here's the link

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2...

but it's not much of a story.  Sounds like the writer is bummed because Zito, 7 years older, is more mature and less flamboyant.  Not much insight.

"The worst day on a ball field is better than the best day in any office." - David Wright

by kkdaz on Jun 27, 2007 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's not my take at all

the story sounds like Zito is taking himself way too seriously and has become more egotistical.  Kind of a natural progression for MLB players, but I think the writer had hopes Zito would be different.

by IndianaAsfan on Jun 27, 2007 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's what I got out of it too.

This writer thinks he's become an ass. BTW, what's a Q rating? Is it short for IQ or GQ because those are just too long to write out?

by peanut gallery on Jun 27, 2007 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think Q rating...

is "recognizability quotient" in the popular media in general.

Don't worry, it's only a safety problem.

by Poppy on Jun 27, 2007 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

You are the (wo)man!

As for me, I'll just add it to the list of pop culture references on which I'm completely out of the loop.

by peanut gallery on Jun 27, 2007 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

And I'll add it to my long, strange list...

of things that I don't have any idea how or why I know.

Don't worry, it's only a safety problem.

by Poppy on Jun 27, 2007 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

oops

thought I included the link.

by WhatElse on Jun 27, 2007 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wow Blez--Seinfeld!

Talk about cosmic convergence.  I was at the library yesterday and pick the bio "Seinfeld" off the shelf and read for about 20 minutes.

Contrary to popular belief, Larry David and Jerry Seinfeld did not pitch it as a show about "nothing", but a show about a stand-up comic.  Jerry would play "himself" because he could not act.  He simply was "not an actor" who could pretend.  The premise was a standup bit that would bookend a story in-between, about how the comic got his material.  One guy (I forget his name) at CastleRock Entertainment is the ONLY reason it made TV.  The pilot was abysmal.  Terrrible reception.  This "guy" said, got to have a female in the cast.  No, said the guys.Well,  absolutely you must, or no show.  Okay.

George Costanza is the person of Larry David, FYI.

The real "Cramer", who was Larry David's neighbor, had a great line about selling his rights to the character "Cramer".  He said he asked for and received "enough money to last me the rest of my life, but if you add in the expense of eating, it falls terribly short!"

Rename Fremont, CA, to Philadelphia, CA. "Philadelphia Athletics" will sound great.

by One won lost won on Jun 27, 2007 11:16 AM PDT reply actions  

cust

if it turns out that cust becomes our dh for the next 6 years and can put up several 270 35hr seasons with a 1.000 ops then whatever happens this year will be worth making that discovery imo.  if we can teach him to play first or left while hitting like that then its even more of a bonus.

by Backspin on Jun 27, 2007 11:42 AM PDT reply actions  

can we teach him to close?
But just because something can be plotted on an X and Y axis does not make it the whole truth. @('.')@

by monkeyball on Jun 27, 2007 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

maybe

that one he threw by crosby at shea had some heat on it...

by Backspin on Jun 27, 2007 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

lol
"We are a complete freak show." -- Billy Beane

by day-to-day on Jun 27, 2007 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Umpire blocked Crosby

The ump ran right in front of the ball, so Crosby could not even see it until it was past him.

That about encapsulated the whole weekend at Shea. Two-three feet "bad" for the Athletics, and a foot or two  "good" for the Mets.  And there, there, turned the season of 2007 IMO.

Rename Fremont, CA, to Philadelphia, CA. "Philadelphia Athletics" will sound great.

by One won lost won on Jun 27, 2007 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

ahhh

that explains a lot.

When I saw it on the replays, I just thought Crosby was lame for not reacting to the off-line throw.  Do umps practice how to avoid that sort of thing?

by MobiusKlein on Jun 27, 2007 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Easy excuse for Bobby

he saw the throw out of Cust's hand and should have had an idea of where the throw was heading.  The ump didn't cross in front of him until it was almost on top of him.  It's just a convenient excuse for a lazy play.

by IndianaAsfan on Jun 27, 2007 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

What??!! Were you there??!!

This is what the players on the field said.  Don't they get any credit??  

Bajesus!  You remind me of that Groucho Marx quote, "Who are you going to believe? Me, or your own two eyes?"

I think they even quoted the ump saying he, the ump, messed up the play by being in the wrong place (or, as they say in Indiana..."lazy".

Rename Fremont, CA, to Philadelphia, CA. "Philadelphia Athletics" will sound great.

by One won lost won on Jun 27, 2007 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

The ump messed up

no question about it.  I'm not saying the ump didn't have anything to do with it, but Bobby still had a very poor effort.  There's really no need for a smart ass reply.  I equate poor effort with laziness, and Crosby's effort on that play was poor and then the umpire's poor positioning compounded the problem to turn it into a run scoring play.  In the course of a season most, if not all, players have a lazy play here and there, and they generally back each other up, both literally and figuratively.  If you honestly think that Crosby did everything he could have to stop the ball, that's fine.  We'll agree to disagree then.  I happen to think he could have done more, and the umpire provided a convenient excuse.

by IndianaAsfan on Jun 27, 2007 5:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, "we" won't agree to disagree
When both parties have "common knowledge" you cannot "agree to disagree".

Do a search on the terms "agree to disagree" and "common knowledge".

A cop pulls over a motorist and says, "Have you been drinking, and the motorist says, "Yes, but just one drink."  "Okay, I'm going to give you a breathalyzer test".  The cop checks the test and says, "Sorry, but you are over the legal limit. I'll have to place you under arrest."  "That's impossible" says the motorist, "I'm not over the legal limit. I know the truth, and ..."

"We'll just have to agree to disagree!"

No, they cannot.  Both parties have common knowledge. And both parties know the same thing about what each other knows.  Thus, they cannot "agree to disagree", especially at the proclamation of the party who is defending an unsupportable position.

Rename Fremont, CA, to Philadelphia, CA. "Philadelphia Athletics" will sound great.

by One won lost won on Jun 27, 2007 10:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Listen

you claim Crosby's play wasn't lazy and I do.  That's what we disagree on.  Why do you insist on being a smart ass?  For the record, a breathalyser could indicate a motorist is over the legal limit when, in fact, he isn't.  So the cop and motorist could agree to disagree.  It's why roadside breathalyser are NOT admissible in court.

by IndianaAsfan on Jun 28, 2007 9:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Even in your own state
http://www.chematics.com/

...that is a company on DOT's list (over ten) of approved manufacturers for the so-called "breathalyzer".  Look up any DUI attorney page.  Not one..

Not one...

..says the evidence is "NOT admissable" in court.

What is with all the "labeling"?  You label Crosby "lazy", you call me a "smart ass" a couple of times.

No one requesting these conclusions. I'd advise laying off the ad hominum stuff.

I do not believe you understand "agree/disagree". If you make a statement that "Crosby has six fingers" and I say he doesn't, you can't simply say, "I think he has six fingers and you don't, so that's what we disagree on."  We both have "common knowledge" that he has five fingers and  both can assume the other has seen similiar pictures of Crosby, or, seen him in person (contrary to your assertion that such 'common knowledge' is impossible.)

The major premise or assertion has to be supported by something.  "Not moving=lazy" is not a supportable premise, unless the player himself gives himself the label "lazy", which is about as  likely as saying that he "plays in Antarctica".  

However, calling someone is a "smart ass" is really lazy.

Rename Fremont, CA, to Philadelphia, CA. "Philadelphia Athletics" will sound great.

by One won lost won on Jun 28, 2007 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

You are unbelievable

First, attorney websites don't discuss admissible evidence.  That's not their purpose.  Their purpose is to attract clients.  Second, in your hypothetical you stated the officer pulled the driver over and administered a breath test.  That requires a portable breath test, and NO state admits that evidence.  The breath tests that ARE admissible are the calibrated units kept at the stationhouse.  Those units are not portable and can only be used after the officer transports the suspect back to the station.  Portable units only establish probable cause to arrest the suspect and transport him/her to the station.  Their error rate is up to .6 depending on the unit used.  That could most definitely lead to a situation where the officer says the driver is over the limit, while he/she actually isn't.  In fact, DUI charges get dropped often because the station breath test doesn't support the field test.
Second, in the world of reasonable people there exists opinion.  The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language defines "disagreement" as a difference of opinion.  My original post said that Crosby's play was lazy.  That is an opinion.  You counter with the common knowledge that he has five fingers.  That is a fact, something entirely different than opinion.  Reasonable people can differ on opinion - it's the very reason we have a jury system to further your legal analogy.
This ends my discussion on the subject.  I will no be replying to anything more you post on this, or any other subject.  I find your sarcasm offensive, and your tone arrogant.  You need a healthy dose of humility.

by IndianaAsfan on Jun 28, 2007 8:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Actually why don't you update your research

on your mathematical theorem to a philosophical issue.  The current literature states, that in the abstract, is isn't possible for two parties to agree to disagree, while, IN PRACTICE, concurrent states of equal knowledge are not possible because two people never perceive the same even in exactly the same way.  Therefore, your supposed state of common knowledge isn't possible in practice.  This also explains why eyewitness testimony is disfavored among academics.
In short, we perceived the play differently, so there is no "common knowledge" in this situation.

by IndianaAsfan on Jun 28, 2007 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

I Completely Agree!

If you look at those A's teams from the '70's, only one hitter, Reggie Jackson, is in the Hall of Fame. Though there were several SOLID hitters, only Reggie had the dazzle (though he was never much better than Frank Thomas or Nick Swisher were last season) and guys like Bando, Campeneris, Rudi and Tenace really didn't have much better overall stats than Chavez, Crosby, Johnson and Shannon Stewart. What they did have was a relatively injury-free pitching staff of Catfish Hunter (Hall of Famer), Vida Blue (some would argue for his induction), Ken Holtzman (like Dave Stewart after him, a very solid four years) and Rollie Fingers (Hall of Famer). Sure the late 80's, early 90's guys had some of the best offense of the Oakland years, but it was really the pitching of Dave Stewart, Bob Welch, Mike Moore and Dennis Eckersley (honorable mentions to Storm Davis and Rick Honeycutt) that enabled that team to win pennants. Then of course there was the Big Three. Billy Beane, however, is in a bit of a bind because of the injuries. He knows that he has a pitching staff every bit as good as 70's, late 80's and earlier this decade. The problem is that half of them are on the DL. The problem is so widespread that a simple trade for either a top tier starter or top tier reliever wouldn't address the problem. I don't envy him right now, because I don't know what the hell to do, other than wait for them all to get healthy and pray for the best with the "understudies."

by may7 on Jun 27, 2007 12:11 PM PDT reply actions  

Yes, health is the key here

I re-read the book "The Big Train" about Walter Johnson, and it has plenty about the Major Leagues and all the teams in the early 20th century (1900-1930).  Because of the injuries to players in the current MLB landscape, I was "watching" for mention of injuries.  Well, they had plenty.  For pitchers, it was the ol' "sore arm".  It simply hurt too much to throw.  How about this?  On one road trip to play New York, the Washington club on which Walter Johnson played, had brought along three pitchers! That's all! The rest stayed behind!  "Sore arms".
On three days rest, he pitched a six-hitter and won 3-0.  Johnson was quizzed, said he could pitch the next day too.  He did, and pitched a four-hitter, and won 6-0.  No Sunday baseball in NY in those days, and the other two pitchers were supposed to pitch the Monday doubleheader.  Yet Keeley came down with a sore throat, and Hughes went back to Washington because his wife was sick.  Walter Johnson was to pitch the first game on Monday (3rd in four days) and like his first game of the series in New York, his opposite was HoFer Jack Chesbro.  Again he beat Chesbro and New York, 4-0, this time a two-hitter.

Johnson got hit in the ribs in the 3rd inning by Chesbro in this game.  Johnson "hid out" in the clubhouse before the second game, as one of his teammates said (as a joke) that they were pitching him again!

In another stretch during the 1908 season, Walter Johnson pitched five complete-game victories in nine days.  He did so, because he was the only..

the ONLY...
pitcher on that major league club able to pitch!  The rest had "sore arms"!

Rename Fremont, CA, to Philadelphia, CA. "Philadelphia Athletics" will sound great.

by One won lost won on Jun 27, 2007 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not entirely accurate

to compare offensive stats from the early 70's to those today.  It is a completely different game.  The early 70's were still dominated by pitchers so that offensive stats would seem lower by comparison.

by IndianaAsfan on Jun 27, 2007 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Two years ago today

For those with short memories, standings as of June 27, 2005:

Angels  46-29  --
Texas   38-36 (7.5)
Oakland 35-40 (11.0)
Seattle 33-41 (12.5)

It's not like this is our worst season ever.

"...but we're also always open to hearing about other sandwiches if it can make our lunch better." -- Nico, channeling Billy Beane

by iglew on Jun 27, 2007 1:36 PM PDT reply actions  

thanks for posting this

I've been meaning to check how far we've been back the past few years. It's great to see that we are not even as bad as we were then, even with all the injuries we have this year.

"I never saw a hooligan I did like. They're like left-handed pitchers, they all have a screw loose somewhere." - The Asphalt Jungle

by drmmerchk on Jun 27, 2007 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

over their heads

 take a little time out and think about it.  The A's bullpen as of the beginning of 2007 is gone.  On DL is street, duch, and colero.  The bullpen also most likely would have been gaudin, kennedy and dinardo. Now the bullpen has only embree left and a bunch of AAA players.  It is a miracle they are over .500.  I rather them suck now then in august because we can trade to get young players.
 Craziest trade of all.  Eric Chavez to the yanks for ARod.  Why it works.  The yanks get a 3b with Arod becoming a free agent.  The A's get rid of a bad contract with chavez 10 million off the books and Arod becomes a free agent at the end of the year.  Why it will not happen.  The yanks never give up even if they have no chance to make playoffs and Beane is in love with chavez.
 Thats my 2 cents.

by Arcman on Jun 27, 2007 1:40 PM PDT reply actions  

I thought about that one too, momentarily

But I gave up on it because ARod doesn't work in the A's clubhouse.  He'd probably drop in HR production (infected with GIDP-itis soon after arrival) and no more "California/San Diego" vibe in the clubhouse.

ARod could, Chavvy could, nix that trade, in addition.

What is ARod getting? North of $10million for the rest of the year?  Eh, just not ... like trying to put a 13-foot carpet in a 12-foot room.  Buy all the nails you want, it's still lookin' "lumpy".

Rename Fremont, CA, to Philadelphia, CA. "Philadelphia Athletics" will sound great.

by One won lost won on Jun 27, 2007 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Scouting reports

The nice thing about AAA and even AAAA players is that there isn't a heckuva lot of information about their game.  Unfortunately, at this point in the season, opposing teams' highly-paid scouts start piecing it together.  Translation?  DiNardo starts getting knocked around like the journeyman he is.  

I'm exceedingly impressed that Gaudin has survived this long as a starter, which speaks more for his development as a legitimate pitcher.  But he's about the beginning and end of it, with the possible exception of Casilla.  Other than that, the A's have been riding the wave of ignorance surrounding little-known hitters and pitchers, and now they're in a little over their heads.

That being said, it's been amazing that they've done as well as they have.  If the Angels weren't playing like the Angels, they still might have a plausible shot.  As it is, I'm gonna spend the rest of the season rooting for the W's, hoping some of the guys have a great second half (what about Swish's average, eh?), and just enjoy the game for what it is... 'cuz we are long shots to see the Fall Classic this year.

Quick note: For anyone who's got ESPN Insider, Rob Neyer wrote a short article about how Jason Kendall is the worst everyday catcher in the league.  Maybe not big news around here, but it's nice to see someone in the media take interest in the club, even if it's for something not-so-positive.

by Joey C. on Jun 27, 2007 2:35 PM PDT reply actions  

Angels Lose, 1-0.

They're playing like us lately.  We have to win tonight and take advantage of the blessings received from the KC Royals.  I think they are my 2nd favorite team now!

by kapers on Jun 27, 2007 3:20 PM PDT reply actions  

Jack CRUSH~~~~

Work It Mother ------!!!!

http://www.silverandblackpride.com/

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Jun 27, 2007 4:16 PM PDT reply actions  

Mark Ellis in the 6 HOLE!!!!

I love how Chavy was NOT up and Jack CRUSHED one as the  
Clean-up hitter!!!

http://www.silverandblackpride.com/

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Jun 27, 2007 4:18 PM PDT reply actions  

Health = Balance = Respectable Record

Way too much is made of Oakland's shortcomings considering the hole that's been the DL. If this team is healthy, they are not back 9 of the Angels. It's remarkable that the pitching has put up the numbers they have, with the near constant pressure of holding the opposition down. If this team could (could have) field/ed Bradley, and the other half of the pitching staff - IMHO - this team is very respectable. The pitching is working over their heads - however a healthy team gives players like Kennedy, Gaudin and DiNardo the security of at least an average offense. They are for real.

"Cool it, brothers." Last words of Malcom X

by Bosnian on Jun 27, 2007 5:28 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Aperture_logo_small
Community Prospect List #4
Img_2672_small
Long-Term Outlook

Recent FanPosts

Small
Comcast needs two Hotstove shows!
Small
Moneyball Part II: Billy Beane Shocks the World. Again.
Hahaha_small
Let's Make Some Nicknames!
Fubarcloud_small
Wolf being told to spend money
Small
The wRC+ Challenge
Pumpkin_small
Maybe this is a stupid stats question
Small
A's reportedly sign Cespedes
Unknown_small
Is It Really Worth It: Three Veterans Who May Be Playing Oakland Next Year, But Shouldn't Be
Small
Manny's Contract

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Josefav2_small danmerqury

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late