Athletics Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

Kendall's K Rate

This isn't a "Kendall sucks" diary, but an attempt to see if his decline in performance is a trend or noise.  

I wasn't a big fan of the Kendall acquisition, but I was always hopeful that he would turn out to be a good player since we were stuck with his contract.  With his struggles this year, it got me to wondering whether it was simply a deterioration of skills for a catcher on the wrong side of 30 who's played a ton of games or simply a run of bad luck.    

One statistic that struck me was his strike out rate.  Let's take a closer look.  

Star-divide

If Kendall really is seeing his skills diminish, K rate seems like an obvious place for a decline to show.  He's a small guy who chokes up 1/3 and takes a "light" swing.  This should enable him to control the bat very well and avoid strike outs.  If he's suddenly striking out more, it could represent a decline in vision and/or hand-eye coordination.  So, the hypothesis is that if his K rate is trending upwards for a long time, it represents a decline in skills.

I snagged Kendall's K/AB stats for each month since 2002.  Since the monthly stats are so erratic, I used a 3-month moving average to show trends.  

Jason Kendall's K/AB Trend with A's
4-2005 N/A
5-2005 N/A
6-2005 8.1% - almost 14% his first month in the league with new pitchers, but adjusted
7-2005 4.9%
8-2005 5.9%
9-2005 5.3%
4-2006 5.8%
5-2006 6.2%
6-2006 9.5%
7-2006 10.7%
8-2006 10.0%
9-2006 10.1%
4-2007 9.8%
5-2007 12.4%
(if someone can figure how to get a graph of these on the web, please let me know)

The Bad:

  1. There is a strong trend towards more strikeouts.  A short-term bump in strikeouts could represent "pressing" too much, but a trend over 2.5 years that shows one's K rate more than doubling is, well, troubling.  

The Good:

  1. Jason's OPS has been fairly steady with the A's (aside from the nose dive due to this year).  Now granted, these numbers aren't great, but at least they're pretty consistent.  

Jason Kendall's OPS Trend with A's

4-2005 N/A
5-2005 N/A
6-2005 .654
7-2005 .699
8-2005 .650
9-2005 .670
4-2006 .628
5-2006 .733
6-2006 .680
7-2006 .683
8-2006 .714
9-2006 .730
4-2007 .661
5-2007 .537

  1. Jason has had his K rate this high in the NL and managed to post some decent months.  In late 2002/early 2003, his K rate trended above .10 and he managed to post a decent 2003 and 2004 while dramatically dropping his K rate trend to below .05.  So, there's a glimmer of hope that he may come back.
  1. Jason's walk rate was .0856 BB/PA in the NL and 0.077 BB/PA in the AL, which represents a decline of about 10%, but with all the noise in the statistics, I'm willing to overlook.    His rates have declined to Chone Figgins-esque levels this year, but even as of last September, he walked 12 times.  

So, the conclusion?  With his strikeouts up and his walks down, his value has clearly declined.  However, his walks should revert to their long-run average, which will help.  If he walks more and has less strikeouts, at least we know this - he won't hit into as many DP's!  If he can turn around his K rate like he did in 2003 and 2004, he might even warrant a one-year extension (at a much discounted price).  

(And if Kendall's wife finds this diary, please note that I had three good points and only one bad point....)

Poll
Is Kendall's decline permanent?
Yes, he's done
96 votes
No, he will come back with a few decent years
18 votes

114 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 27 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Athletics Nation

Monday Musings

Jul 2007 by Tyler Bleszinski - 40 comments

Catching a Win

Jun 2007 by Tyler Bleszinski - 105 comments

The Kendall Dilemma

May 2007 by Tyler Bleszinski - 126 comments

Around SB Nation

Comments

Display:

Poll

I guess the poll title should be "Is Kendall's decline non-temporary?" since all over our declines are permanent in the grand scheme of things.

Signatures? We don't need no stinking signatures.

by jubjub on May 29, 2007 9:18 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Graphs from Fangraphs

Strikeouts per PA:

Walks per PA:

by Danny on May 29, 2007 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

IsoP

Thanks for that, I didn't know about that site.  

My favorite graph:

Signatures? We don't need no stinking signatures.

by jubjub on May 30, 2007 8:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

On the bright side ...

it can't really get any worse ... (quite literally)

"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback

by devo on May 30, 2007 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

dead cat bounce?
Signatures? We don't need no stinking signatures.

by jubjub on May 30, 2007 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure why walks would revert to long-run avg.

It's pretty much impossible for a player with a .194 slugging percentage (just 2 extra-base hits in 176 plate appearances) to draw any significant number of walks.  There's no penalty for throwing lots of strikes to Kendall...worst outcome is a single.  He would have to start demonstrating some pop in the bat to see his walk rate increase.  A weekly fly ball to the warning track, mixed in with tons of infield grounders and the increased K rate that you note, isn't going to get it done.

by Soaker on May 29, 2007 9:23 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

that's probably the logical conclusion, but tried

to be an optimist...

I was hoping the walks were down due to his pressing, not his lack of power.  Maybe the answer is to smuggle some barroids into his gatorade and get him to bulk up a little.  I'll pay for the first week.

Signatures? We don't need no stinking signatures.

by jubjub on May 29, 2007 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

walk rate and BABIP

As Soaker says, there's no real reason for Kendall's BB rate to progress to his career mean -- there's no motivation for pitchers to avoid the strike zone with Kendall at bat. Heck, there's no motivation for pitchers to pitch to the edges of the zone.

I think this is akin to Kendall's declining BABIP )which would make a nice complement to this diary), where extraordinary outfield positioning has robbed Kendall of a "normal" progression to the mean.

And I know your suggestion was in jest, but do we really think lack of bulk/muscle mass is Kendall's problem? It's not as if he's Kent Tekulve. If his problem is declining power, and it's due to a physical infirmity, then he must have something seriously wrong with him -- something degenerative.

You swing harder, you strike out; you try to throw harder, you hit the mascot. ~ theblackpearl @('.')@

by monkeyball on May 29, 2007 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

if not strength, then what

what is his problem?  I honestly don't know.  I have to assume he has tried to swing "harder" and maybe choke down to create more impulse (physics and all) on the ball.  So, the next logical step is to get him a tape of John Basedow (not sure if they show those commercials on the Left Coast).  

The only thing I thought was maybe it was his eye sight and hand-eye coordination, which would prevent him from hitting the ball solidly.  Maybe he has glaucoma.  

Signatures? We don't need no stinking signatures.

by jubjub on May 29, 2007 11:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know, either

There's the speculation that he had secret surgery on his hand/wrist in the early '00s. There's my theory that he's maybe suffered multiple concussions. Or maybe it's just that he's so locked in to his peculiar hitting style (perhaps originally and/or more and more because of some undisclosed injury/condition) that he's unable to reconceptualize his swing on a more normal major-league stroke.

My opinion is that there's something physically wrong with him (what, I don't know). From what we've seen of Kendall, he's an intensely proud and self-directed man, and if there's anything he could do to improve his performance, he'd be doing it. I don't think anyone here would ever accuse him of not trying. (And I'm not at all implying that you were, jubjub. Just reinforcing the point.)

You swing harder, you strike out; you try to throw harder, you hit the mascot. ~ theblackpearl @('.')@

by monkeyball on May 29, 2007 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with last point

and almost said that in my comment.  I have to assume he's tried everything, so it's either bad luck or something he can't control.  

Signatures? We don't need no stinking signatures.

by jubjub on May 29, 2007 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess all the Kendall-apologists have gone

into hiding for their own safety.

poll is currently 18-0 that he's washed up.  ouch.

Signatures? We don't need no stinking signatures.

by jubjub on May 29, 2007 10:42 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I guess it depends too

I'm thinking the current depths of his dip are temporary and he will improve this year, but I don't think he can have a truly decent year.

And we're up to 20-0.

Huh. I always thought that baseball's version of a home run is the motherf---ing home run itself. -FJM

by oblique on May 29, 2007 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Damn.

When I saw "Kendall's Krate" I thought maybe we were shipping him someplace.

Huh. I always thought that baseball's version of a home run is the motherf---ing home run itself. -FJM

by oblique on May 29, 2007 10:44 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Free Shipping

with 13 million dollar order

Signatures? We don't need no stinking signatures.

by jubjub on May 29, 2007 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

23-1 now!

Chantel has voted!

"Getting eaten by exotic animals is a better way to go than being eaten by a squirrel or a crow."

by Poppy on May 29, 2007 10:54 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

is that his wife?

maybe she'll write a blog on her myspace page

Poor Oz...

Signatures? We don't need no stinking signatures.

by jubjub on May 29, 2007 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's why the disclaimer was there

I would hope that Chantel had a little more class.  I think Jay would tell her to suck it up or walk it off or something of that ilk anyway.

"If I'm an 8 or a 5 on a scale of 1-10, what is Eric Chavez?"-Drunk guy. "A 15" his seat neighbor.

by mlleaimee on May 29, 2007 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

just in case

I put it in bold

Signatures? We don't need no stinking signatures.

by jubjub on May 29, 2007 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mark Krieger, you can deal with

An angry Kendall, not so much.  I saw what he did to Lackey.  It took two guys to take him down.

"If I'm an 8 or a 5 on a scale of 1-10, what is Eric Chavez?"-Drunk guy. "A 15" his seat neighbor.

by mlleaimee on May 29, 2007 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Too bad...

there are no "enforcers" in baseball...  Kendall would be totally worth his contract just to send him out to injure people on the Angels...

"Work like you don't need the money. Love like you've never been hurt. Dance like nobody's watching."- former A's pitcher Satchel Paige

by The Pilots Dared Me To Die on May 29, 2007 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And

He'd be really good at it and probably really enjoy it.  Lackey can be first.

"If I'm an 8 or a 5 on a scale of 1-10, what is Eric Chavez?"-Drunk guy. "A 15" his seat neighbor.

by mlleaimee on May 30, 2007 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope he isn't done.

No matter how he's hitting, Jason Kendall is an extremely smart baseball player.  It's hard to quantify the degree to which that helps, but it does.  His defensive value and base-running value is easier to quantify, and it's also better than the average catcher.

So it goes.

by jeepers on May 29, 2007 5:58 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

his base-running value is indeed easy to quantify

If he's not getting on base, it's worth precisely 0.

I'm sorry, but your visions of Utopia will be crushed by the reality of Larry Davis and his minions. ~ grover @('.')@

by monkeyball on May 29, 2007 6:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not really

"base"running in his case.

The game represents... the checkered journey of life. - Milton Bradley

by mikeA on May 29, 2007 7:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

dugout running?
Signatures? We don't need no stinking signatures.

by jubjub on May 29, 2007 8:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

HBP

And he never seems to get HBP anymore. Heck he even took the arm guard off. I would think that he would be trying more that ever to get HBP. Unless of course his mystery injury is a result of being HBP too many times in some spot.

by Larry E on May 30, 2007 5:00 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms
Start posting about the Athletics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ph3spec_small
Having fun with Pythagoras, or, who got lucky during 2009
Dsc00764_small
DLD - 11/07/2009 - How to Keep Yourself Occupied in the Off-Season
527918550406_0_bg_small
2010 Off-Season Blueprint
Depaulbluedemons_small
Community Prospect List #15
Super_grover_small
2010 Offseason Primer

Recent FanPosts

Bill_king_small
AFL Rising Stars Showcase Tonight on MLBN @ 5PM
Me_at_att_park_small
Greener Grass, Episode 4: The Biggest Off Season (Potential) Decision Doesn't Involve Free Agents
Oaklandathletics_small
Hardy to Minnesota. What's with the early offseason trades?
Tyler_at_maya_school_small
Happy 6th Birthday, AN!
Oaklandathletics_small
facebook Members: Keep the A's in OAKLAND
Bill_king_small
Organizational Statistics: Winter Leagues

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Tyler_at_maya_school_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

As_kings_cal_small louismg

Editors

Countdown_small Taj Adib

Ziegler160px_small Flashfire

527918550406_0_bg_small notsellingjeans