Kendall's K Rate
This isn't a "Kendall sucks" diary, but an attempt to see if his decline in performance is a trend or noise.
I wasn't a big fan of the Kendall acquisition, but I was always hopeful that he would turn out to be a good player since we were stuck with his contract. With his struggles this year, it got me to wondering whether it was simply a deterioration of skills for a catcher on the wrong side of 30 who's played a ton of games or simply a run of bad luck.
One statistic that struck me was his strike out rate. Let's take a closer look.
If Kendall really is seeing his skills diminish, K rate seems like an obvious place for a decline to show. He's a small guy who chokes up 1/3 and takes a "light" swing. This should enable him to control the bat very well and avoid strike outs. If he's suddenly striking out more, it could represent a decline in vision and/or hand-eye coordination. So, the hypothesis is that if his K rate is trending upwards for a long time, it represents a decline in skills.
I snagged Kendall's K/AB stats for each month since 2002. Since the monthly stats are so erratic, I used a 3-month moving average to show trends.
Jason Kendall's K/AB Trend with A's
4-2005 N/A
5-2005 N/A
6-2005 8.1% - almost 14% his first month in the league with new pitchers, but adjusted
7-2005 4.9%
8-2005 5.9%
9-2005 5.3%
4-2006 5.8%
5-2006 6.2%
6-2006 9.5%
7-2006 10.7%
8-2006 10.0%
9-2006 10.1%
4-2007 9.8%
5-2007 12.4%
(if someone can figure how to get a graph of these on the web, please let me know)
The Bad:
- There is a strong trend towards more strikeouts. A short-term bump in strikeouts could represent "pressing" too much, but a trend over 2.5 years that shows one's K rate more than doubling is, well, troubling.
The Good:
- Jason's OPS has been fairly steady with the A's (aside from the nose dive due to this year). Now granted, these numbers aren't great, but at least they're pretty consistent.
Jason Kendall's OPS Trend with A's
4-2005 N/A
5-2005 N/A
6-2005 .654
7-2005 .699
8-2005 .650
9-2005 .670
4-2006 .628
5-2006 .733
6-2006 .680
7-2006 .683
8-2006 .714
9-2006 .730
4-2007 .661
5-2007 .537
- Jason has had his K rate this high in the NL and managed to post some decent months. In late 2002/early 2003, his K rate trended above .10 and he managed to post a decent 2003 and 2004 while dramatically dropping his K rate trend to below .05. So, there's a glimmer of hope that he may come back.
- Jason's walk rate was .0856 BB/PA in the NL and 0.077 BB/PA in the AL, which represents a decline of about 10%, but with all the noise in the statistics, I'm willing to overlook. His rates have declined to Chone Figgins-esque levels this year, but even as of last September, he walked 12 times.
So, the conclusion? With his strikeouts up and his walks down, his value has clearly declined. However, his walks should revert to their long-run average, which will help. If he walks more and has less strikeouts, at least we know this - he won't hit into as many DP's! If he can turn around his K rate like he did in 2003 and 2004, he might even warrant a one-year extension (at a much discounted price).
(And if Kendall's wife finds this diary, please note that I had three good points and only one bad point....)
0 recs |
27 comments
Comments
Poll
I guess the poll title should be "Is Kendall's decline non-temporary?" since all over our declines are permanent in the grand scheme of things.
by jubjub on May 29, 2007 9:18 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Graphs from Fangraphs
Strikeouts per PA:

Walks per PA:

by Danny on May 29, 2007 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
IsoP
Thanks for that, I didn't know about that site.
My favorite graph:

by jubjub on May 30, 2007 8:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
On the bright side ...
it can't really get any worse ... (quite literally)
by devo on May 30, 2007 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
dead cat bounce?
by jubjub on May 30, 2007 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure why walks would revert to long-run avg.
It's pretty much impossible for a player with a .194 slugging percentage (just 2 extra-base hits in 176 plate appearances) to draw any significant number of walks. There's no penalty for throwing lots of strikes to Kendall...worst outcome is a single. He would have to start demonstrating some pop in the bat to see his walk rate increase. A weekly fly ball to the warning track, mixed in with tons of infield grounders and the increased K rate that you note, isn't going to get it done.
by Soaker on May 29, 2007 9:23 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
that's probably the logical conclusion, but tried
to be an optimist...
I was hoping the walks were down due to his pressing, not his lack of power. Maybe the answer is to smuggle some barroids into his gatorade and get him to bulk up a little. I'll pay for the first week.
by jubjub on May 29, 2007 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
walk rate and BABIP
As Soaker says, there's no real reason for Kendall's BB rate to progress to his career mean -- there's no motivation for pitchers to avoid the strike zone with Kendall at bat. Heck, there's no motivation for pitchers to pitch to the edges of the zone.
I think this is akin to Kendall's declining BABIP )which would make a nice complement to this diary), where extraordinary outfield positioning has robbed Kendall of a "normal" progression to the mean.
And I know your suggestion was in jest, but do we really think lack of bulk/muscle mass is Kendall's problem? It's not as if he's Kent Tekulve. If his problem is declining power, and it's due to a physical infirmity, then he must have something seriously wrong with him -- something degenerative.
by monkeyball on May 29, 2007 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
if not strength, then what
what is his problem? I honestly don't know. I have to assume he has tried to swing "harder" and maybe choke down to create more impulse (physics and all) on the ball. So, the next logical step is to get him a tape of John Basedow (not sure if they show those commercials on the Left Coast).
The only thing I thought was maybe it was his eye sight and hand-eye coordination, which would prevent him from hitting the ball solidly. Maybe he has glaucoma.
by jubjub on May 29, 2007 11:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know, either
There's the speculation that he had secret surgery on his hand/wrist in the early '00s. There's my theory that he's maybe suffered multiple concussions. Or maybe it's just that he's so locked in to his peculiar hitting style (perhaps originally and/or more and more because of some undisclosed injury/condition) that he's unable to reconceptualize his swing on a more normal major-league stroke.
My opinion is that there's something physically wrong with him (what, I don't know). From what we've seen of Kendall, he's an intensely proud and self-directed man, and if there's anything he could do to improve his performance, he'd be doing it. I don't think anyone here would ever accuse him of not trying. (And I'm not at all implying that you were, jubjub. Just reinforcing the point.)
by monkeyball on May 29, 2007 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with last point
and almost said that in my comment. I have to assume he's tried everything, so it's either bad luck or something he can't control.
by jubjub on May 29, 2007 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess all the Kendall-apologists have gone
into hiding for their own safety.
poll is currently 18-0 that he's washed up. ouch.
by jubjub on May 29, 2007 10:42 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I guess it depends too
I'm thinking the current depths of his dip are temporary and he will improve this year, but I don't think he can have a truly decent year.
And we're up to 20-0.
by oblique on May 29, 2007 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Damn.
When I saw "Kendall's Krate" I thought maybe we were shipping him someplace.
by oblique on May 29, 2007 10:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Free Shipping
with 13 million dollar order
by jubjub on May 29, 2007 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
23-1 now!
Chantel has voted!
by Poppy on May 29, 2007 10:54 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
is that his wife?
maybe she'll write a blog on her myspace page
Poor Oz...
by jubjub on May 29, 2007 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's why the disclaimer was there
I would hope that Chantel had a little more class. I think Jay would tell her to suck it up or walk it off or something of that ilk anyway.
by mlleaimee on May 29, 2007 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
just in case
I put it in bold
by jubjub on May 29, 2007 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mark Krieger, you can deal with
An angry Kendall, not so much. I saw what he did to Lackey. It took two guys to take him down.
by mlleaimee on May 29, 2007 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too bad...
there are no "enforcers" in baseball... Kendall would be totally worth his contract just to send him out to injure people on the Angels...
by The Pilots Dared Me To Die on May 29, 2007 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And
He'd be really good at it and probably really enjoy it. Lackey can be first.
by mlleaimee on May 30, 2007 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope he isn't done.
No matter how he's hitting, Jason Kendall is an extremely smart baseball player. It's hard to quantify the degree to which that helps, but it does. His defensive value and base-running value is easier to quantify, and it's also better than the average catcher.
by jeepers on May 29, 2007 5:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
his base-running value is indeed easy to quantify
If he's not getting on base, it's worth precisely 0.
by monkeyball on May 29, 2007 6:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not really
"base"running in his case.
by mikeA on May 29, 2007 7:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
dugout running?
by jubjub on May 29, 2007 8:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
HBP
And he never seems to get HBP anymore. Heck he even took the arm guard off. I would think that he would be trying more that ever to get HBP. Unless of course his mystery injury is a result of being HBP too many times in some spot.
by Larry E on May 30, 2007 5:00 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















