What is it about Number 15?
by Tyler Bleszinski on May 14, 2007 10:08 PM PDT
in News
Email
PrintCome here little boys and girls and let me tell you a story about a pitcher that once wore number 15 for the Oakland Athletics. He was a smallish pitcher from the South who had a wicked sinker. He also had several years with the Oakland A's where he would pitch beautifully, yet for some reason the guys who wore green and gold refused to score runs whenever he took the mound. Either that or the bullpen would wind up giving away his wins.
Apparently Danny Haren didn't ever hear that story when he decided to switch his number before the season began from 24 to 15. Haren has been cursed by the same issues that Tim Hudson once was. Either the A's refuse to score or the bullpen gives it up.
Regardless, the A's got Bucked tonight in more ways that one. The home plate umpire clearly missed strike three on Justin Duchscherer's pitch to John Buck and the next pitch, Buck parked over the left center field wall. Duke's cutter still isn't working the way it has in the past because in years gone by, there's no chance that Buck does that on a solid Duke cutter. It seems like the only pitch Duke has working for him right now is that curveball and when Ron Kulpa decided that several curves that were strikes weren't, Duke switched back to the cutter and began getting pounded all over the field.
I did think that the A's had some more magic in them tonight. I thought for a brief moment that Joakim Soria would join Rivera, Papelbon and Borowski as pitchers who've blown saves to the A's this year. But alas, it wasn't mean to be and the pitcher who now sports the best ERA in the American League and the third best in all of baseball still sits at a paltry three wins and two losses. Poor, poor Danny.
As for Duke, you've got to think that there is something wrong with him because that key pitch, the cutter, sets everything else up for him. If he doesn't have it, he becomes an average pitcher. Even the outs tonight were loud ones. I'm wondering if all the innings over the past couple of years (I believe he's second in usage out of the pen behind only Scot Shields who has also given up really crushing hits this year) has taken its toll on him. Is he hurting or just experiencing some arm fatigue? I'm not sure, but I might've gone to Street in this one early because the A's had a good chance to score some runs off the Royals bullpen. It's easy to say that in hindsight, but I did say it aloud when I saw that Duke had come into the game. Don't get me wrong, I love Duke, but he just doesn't seem like himself yet this year. In seasons past, a situation like tonight was automatic.
Oh and kudos to Bobby Crosby for starting to look a little more major league every day. It's good to see him have good games on a consistent basis. Now if he could just string at least a couple of weeks like that together, the A's offense would get a huge boost.
64 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Totally agree with you Blez
Duke is off. Haren is unbelievably similar to Hudson. Crosby looking better every game. It's time to give the Duke a rest. Overuse. And getting squeezed by the home plate ump. What an ass. Go A's tomorrow! C'mon offense!
by A'sfansince1970 on May 14, 2007 10:08 PM PDT reply actions
I don't see how Geren can keep allowing
Duke to go out there and lose games for the A's. he either needs to be sent to the minors and get things straightened out, or geren needs to stop using him in close games until he can prove that he's reliable.
by larrysgurl on May 14, 2007 10:09 PM PDT reply actions
And so it goes...
Losing the close ones hurts. Losing in a blowout hurts. Really, losing hurts.
Truth is, losing 2-1 counts just as much against us as the 10-7 dramatic victory did yesterday. Funny how that works.
Dan Haren has really stepped up his game this year. I'm very impressed every time he takes the mound. Sure, he didn't get the W, but that's certainly not his fault. The A's offense has got to be capable of producing more than a single run against the Royals (Meche or no Meche).
And we've got to get it as fans that Cust can and will strike out, and Buck will too. They're great to root for, but they're not going to bat 1.000. And yes, props to Bobby for getting his act together. It's very promising.
True
But losing games that you really ought to have won hurts even more.
by lenscrafters on May 14, 2007 10:21 PM PDT up reply actions
My dos pesos...
* My guess: I don't think anything is "wrong" with Duke--I think he's just pitching badly. He gets to have a bad month every three years. I say keep throwing him out there in the set-up role as long as he's healthy.
* I do think Chavy should have bunted the runners over in the 8th. I know he doesn't bunt much, but my recollection is that he's perfectly skilled at it. Against a righty I'd say absolutely swing away, but in that lefty/lefty matchup, with Johnson as hot as he's been, I'd say go ahead and bunt. Not a "bad" decision by Geren, IMO, just not the one I wanted.
* The 2-2 pitch to John Buck was a strike. Personally, I thought Kulpa's strike zone was outstanding tonight, but that was the one call I thought he really missed. Bad one to miss.
* Danny Haren is not a #2 starter. Yow!
no way should Duke stay the set up man. that's
not a role that you let someone work on their issues in.
by larrysgurl on May 14, 2007 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Here are your choices:
2. Witasick. He may have had a good week in low leverage situations, but he has never done well in pressure situations and I'm going to go with his career track record over his performance in the last seven days.
3. Embree. Are you serious?
4. Duchscherer.
I'll take Duke.
I understand that the choices suck
but at this point I don't see the harm in letting someone else be the setup man. the worst that can happen is that they are just as bad as duke. if that happens then put duke back in the role. right now Duke is doing nothing but hurt the A's.
by larrysgurl on May 14, 2007 10:26 PM PDT up reply actions
No, the worst that could happen
well I think that tells you how bad the bullpen
is, and maybe it's time for Billy to make a trade because at this point Duke is just as bad to me as the other guys.
by larrysgurl on May 14, 2007 10:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Sheesh. There's a difference
We should call up McBeth
Oh, never mind.
by BlameChannel53 on May 14, 2007 10:37 PM PDT up reply actions
so how long do they have to pitch badly
before they become a bad bullpen? and how many games is Duke going to cost the A's while they wait for him to come around?
by larrysgurl on May 14, 2007 10:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Here's a good basic formula:
Not if he says his own pitching is
"unacceptable".
He says himself he is not spotting his pitches correctly. Take him at his word.
by One won lost won on May 14, 2007 10:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Right--Duke says his pitches
I don't think we want to see
Chavez try to remember how to bunt after not having been asked to bunt in...years. He may have been skilled at it at one point in his career, but the eighth inning of a tie game is not the time for us to find out that Chavez's bunting skills are rusty from years of non-use.
In fact...
...looking through Chavez's stats, the number of sac hits he has in his career is...
...zero.
Chavy is asked to bunt
If Chavez bunts...
...in the 8th with two on and none out - and hear me say bunt and not find an antidote for the AIDS virus - the A's likely win the game. We don't have a great offensive club. So we need to manufacture runs. Even an offensive juggernaut probably bunts in that situation when all you likely need to win the game is a single run. Absolutely inexcusable.
by willcmatthews on May 15, 2007 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Agree, go with Street
He was fresh...could gone two innings if necessary.
Duchscherer himself says he's up with everything.
Take him at his word; DON'T USE HIM!
Agree with Chavez bunting. Every ML player should practice bunting and be skilled at it. No excuse, unless winning and losing don't matter much.
Just like in golf you use different clubs for different approaches to the hole, why wouldn't you use a longer, lighter bat just to make contact? Just get it past the infield if it's the 7th... swing away for the bomb in the 2nd, 3rd.
by One won lost won on May 14, 2007 10:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Agree with Nico, Street should have been in
If Street winds up pitching two innings, don't you lose your closer for the next game? Possibly, but protecting a 1-run lead tomorrow is not one iota more critical than preserving a dead-even score tonight, and it's considerably less likely (save situations for will arise in well under 50% of games). This was an outright mistake by Geren unless he thought Duchscherer was just as likely as Street to preserve the scoreless tie. And if that's what he thought, then that was a mistake.
I have a question about the #15
Does Haren's jersey number referrence the number of runs he expects the a's to score for him this year?
Correctomundo!
He's gonna draw number one starters... that was Hudson's problem too.
by One won lost won on May 14, 2007 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Let's start the compaign
to have Haren change is number to 99, Blanton to 98, Gaudin to 97, Kennedy to 96, Rookie of the week to 95. Let's maximize our ability to score runs.
Crosby / Chavvy
Crosby saved a run w/ his defense after Chavvy's "semi-bad" defense play by not going for the double-play in the 4th Inning (I think). He dove for the ball, keeping it from going to the outfield. Good stuff.
Crosby is actually looking like an MLB Player. I saw him lay off a couple outside sliders from Meche. Dude needs to learn how to slide feet first, though. Head first slides are things that Crosby should not be doing...EVER!
Chavvy, Chavvy, Chavvy??? Milton and Swisher are the team leaders, and they need to tell Chavvy to "Shake Himself". Dude needs a Sports psychologist in the worst way.
I think Chavy actually made
word
Get the run at the plate.
by One won lost won on May 14, 2007 10:29 PM PDT up reply actions
What I love about Chavy
Doesn't it suck...
...knowing that if you don't turn that double play in the 4th inning (Chavvy), you will be down 0-1 with little chance for a comeback?
Part of Chavvy's decision to go home is because he knows it will be tough to score a run vs. Gil Meche. That kind of sucks, doesn't it?
by Colorado Fan on May 15, 2007 7:37 AM PDT up reply actions
That play was in the 7th inning, not the 4th.
by OaktownPower on May 15, 2007 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions
Really?
by Colorado Fan on May 16, 2007 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions
Don't wanna burst your bubble
but every half decent third baseman thinks ahead like that. Going home was the right play, and it was what most third basemen would do.
by Rollo Tomasi @ Athletics Nation on May 15, 2007 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions
What? Every ballplayer!
"If the ball is hit to me, where am I going to throw it???"
That was the question you were required to ask yourself, as a fielder, in my "How to Play Baseball" book published in the 1950s. They emphasized knowing what you would do -before- the ball was hit, so you would do it quickly and not hesitate.
You don't get to the Major League level being "surprised" in the field!
by One won lost won on May 16, 2007 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Jeebus, 2-1.
read the yahoo sports recap. sigh. and yep, i would have gone with street. a hr off of street would be at least somewhat less surprising than one off duke---- lately.
And by "less," of course,
i am going to fork over the bucks
to get my resume done-over professionally....my grammar, spelling, and general writing skills have gone to hell from three years on AN....and i really want to get out of here.
1-5 for me so far
after I think 17-5 or so last year. Damn.
Fun game, though. I loved tonight's lineup. I could use some more of that.
It all evens out, doesn't it?
Don't go to any more games this year! ;-)
by Tyler Bleszinski on May 14, 2007 11:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Didn't attend tonight
And I don't live in Oakland, but I think I've achieved something kinda remarkable.
The A's have won the last 7 games that I've attended in person! That dates back to June of 2004. I live in SoCal, so that's a lot of games that I've seen the A's win in Anaheim. Nothing like leaving that place after a victory.
1-0 so far in 2007!
And I thought Chavy made the right play
He was off balance, so it was 50-50 for the DP, whereas the out at home was a sure thing.
As for bunting; since he never ever bunts it seems like your asking to spot the other team an 0-2 count.
Duke has looked bad for awhile. Same with Kiko...
Chavvy Didn't Bunt
Mr. Pez Man (or whatever he calls himself) and I were at the game tonight. Okay. Runners on first and second, no one out, bottom of the 8th --- Haren's shot to win the game. Chavez at the plate.
The third baseman, our old pal Estaban German, is playing back. The score is 0-0.
This is the PERFECT time to bunt the runner over, Pez sez. If Chavvy can just lay one down along the third base line, not only will it get Buck to third and Swish to second, but it could turn into an infield hit for Chavvy (what with German playing back and all). Then, when Bradley comes up, a deep fly puts the A's up 1-0, and Street can come in to try to save it.
Instead, Chavvy buckles and groans and strikes out. Then true to form, Bradley hits the deep fly which would have put the A's ahead.
I agree with Pez --- why the hell was Chavvy swinging away?
by richwol on May 14, 2007 11:13 PM PDT reply actions
Because he has never had a sacrifice bunt
in his entire career. I sure as hell like his odds more to hit a fly ball than I do to try and get his first sac in 10 years in the Majors.
by OaktownPower on May 14, 2007 11:49 PM PDT up reply actions
His Offensive Fundamentals are Unsound
If, after ten years in the majors, Chavez is incapable of laying down a bunt, then he shouldn't be receiving the kind of salary he's receiving. Okay, if the guy is Barry Bonds in his prime juiced days, or Dan Johnson on a 14-game hitting streak, laying down a bunt at that point may not be appropriate. But he's not. Eric Chavez has a .271 lifetime batting average, is hitting .255 today with his power numbers dwindling year by year. This is a guy who needs to do the basics at the plate. I mean, are you saying he never bunts in practice, that he doesn't know how? I would assume (I don't know for a fact) that even Mario Mendoza, he of the famed Mendoza Line, knew how to bunt. Hell, all National League pitchers are taught to lay down a bunt, and most can do it successfully at least some of the time. Even, I'd presume, Barry Zito, nobody's idea of a major league hitter.
by richwol on May 15, 2007 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions
It didn't even need to be a good bunt...
All that Chavez needed to do was get the ball on the ground to the left side and the sacrifice would've been successful. Then, Bradley's fly would've done the job.
And damn, it was cold out there last night.
That would be funny...
if Hudson missed making the Hall of Fame because he wore the wrong number.
Actually, that would suck...
As much as this loss...
Kendall is done...
teams have figured him out entirely. They are not pitching him inside so that he can try to step into pitches. They are letting him make contact and ground out. They know he has no power so the outfielders play him totally shallow so that any hits that may have dunked in before are very easy to catch now. Plus he couldn't throw a turtle out at second base. There's got to be other guys who can call a great game. Kendall is finished! If Cust takes over at DH, I say Piazza catches. That would be a great lineup without a liability in the C position.
Piazza isn't exactly great at throwing people
out either.
by larrysgurl on May 15, 2007 4:44 AM PDT up reply actions
Piazza would give up so many SB
It would be comical. People would run WILD on him. He cannot be the Catcher and I don't get why people keep posting for him to the be the catcher.
by OaktownPower on May 15, 2007 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions
Amen
by fridaynightfan on May 15, 2007 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions
Rubber Arm Scot Shields ..
.. {Setup man for the Halos} - Hasn't been lights out either this year. He gave up a three run bomb to Travis Hafner to lose a game in Milwaukee {where they played that series due to the weather in Cleveland}; he gave up a grand slam to Ben Broussard which didn't lose the game but could easily have if the score had been closer; he gave up a winning walkoff homer to Nelson Cruz in Texas; maybe more that I can't remember but you get the picture, he has almost been as shaky as Duke at times this year ..
by Randy Bell on May 15, 2007 12:35 AM PDT reply actions
Was thinking the same thing with #15
I told my wife....Haren needs to take that #15 and burn it. It's cursed with no run support. As for Duke, he just ain't right. I had a feeling he would give up a dinger. But I don't blame him, we didn't score and got give hats off to Meche too. The Blue Jays are in need of a closer, maybe Duke can go back to Canada, and maybe there is something the Jays have that we need.
by What Would Rickey Do on May 15, 2007 5:36 AM PDT reply actions
Chavez made the right play
It's just amazing to me that he can be so very astute and smart and brilliant and "heads up" defensively ... and so clueless, inept, and downright AAish offensively.
I just can't figure him out, and I'd save myself a lot of angst if I stopped trying.
Rarely takes the outside pitch the other way -- every pitcher knows he'll try to pull it and probably miss it or roll over in the process ... the times he does go to left, I think it's by accident. He'll hit a two-run bomb in a 7-3 game regularly ... need him to come through in a tight one? Forget it. Repeatedly fails to even move runners over when you need it most.
Seriously, one of the most fundamentally unsound hitters I've ever seen. Weird. Great talent. No results.
I'm still upset about the bottem of the 8th
1st and 2nd nobody out, 8th inning tie ball game. You bunt the runners over. We didn't need a big inning, we just needed 1 run. If it was the 4th inning then sure, let Chavez hit and hope for a big inning. But it was the 8th inning in a tie ball game. Bunt the runners, get a sacrafice fly, Street pitches the ninth, game over 1-0.
by bolt on May 15, 2007 11:35 AM PDT reply actions
Anyone had problems with Chavy hitting 3rd?
Should be down in the 6 spot. 2-5 should be Swish, Johnson, Bradley, Cust
by asfansince1989 on May 15, 2007 12:10 PM PDT reply actions
I thought the Giants were geriatrics...
it's endemic to the A's bullpen
We once had a closer who suffered from Arthuritis.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
