Erubiel Durazo Released
The A's have decided to go a different direction at first base. I'm sure more will be discussed tomorrow. Stay tuned for updates.
0 recs |
110 comments
Comments
Yay!
-Cindi.
by Nico on Mar 31, 2007 9:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hi Cindi. Actually, it's not an album
it's a man who was put in prison, wrongly accused of being worse than a man named Nicholas Swisher in Right Field.
by LAXile on Mar 31, 2007 10:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
tequila + beer + wi-fi +AN=
posts like the above.
by LAXile on Apr 1, 2007 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was always afraid that my baby's first words...
would have been, "I hate Durazo" seeing as how often I said it in Naught 5. However, this spring was an eerie reminder when she repeated, "Oh F**K!" immediately after I heard about DJ's hip...I was sure that this poor little sweet 2 year old was doomed to remember years later how sad it was to watch her father listen to the game and mutter constantly..."I hate Durazo!"
Well...Problem solved.
by thefatman on Mar 31, 2007 10:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
so...
does DiNardo make the team? Speculations?
by Squeaky on Mar 31, 2007 10:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Dinardo will start at AAA.
Gaudin for fifth!
by OaktownRajah on Mar 31, 2007 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Must be DiNardo and Halsey
by Nico on Mar 31, 2007 10:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That seems more and more likely
Gaudin for the fifth spot, Walker and Swish to Platoon at first, Ronnie Mac and Swish to Platoon in right. It seems like 2005 all over again...lol, you know what I mean?
by Shippee33 on Mar 31, 2007 10:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Breaking up is hard to do...
by LawDaddy on Mar 31, 2007 10:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nico made a good point in the other thread...
Sorry, laughed at that for some reason, not sure why.
Anyway, Kielty full time is far better than what we can expect from Walker at first. I can see using Kielty in Right and Swish at First to start the season with Buck in AAA. This leaves Walker on the bench to warm Geren's seat, a job once held by the likes of Ginter and Perez (for Macha) and Yabu (for, ironically, Geren in the bullpen). If Kielty falls flat on his face or gets injured and/or leaves us no other choice, then then we immediately call up Buck and the new era begins.
by DMOAS on Mar 31, 2007 10:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Disagree - we risk more serious injury to Kielty
.. by overworking Kielty we risk further injury problems on the team .. as I posted in reply to Nico's post in previous thread ..
by Randy Bell on Mar 31, 2007 10:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Kielty isn't ready to handle
those duties, then he'd better start the season on the DL. Seriously, if his body isn't up for the task and he truly is pushing himself, he's no good to us or himself right now. He should be focused on getting healthy first. But since he's supposedly back to all of his baseball activities, you have to assume that's not the case.
by DMOAS on Mar 31, 2007 10:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How?
Since when has Kielty learned to consistently hit right handed pitchers?
by IndianaAsfan on Apr 1, 2007 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is a note from the side
Buck has had an impressive spring, but he still might at least three months away, and it'd be a bad idea to drop Kielty for him, as it leave the team overly left-handed. Buck and Todd Walker are both left-handed hitters, and there should only be room for one. If Buck is carried, he'd be the primary right fielder, pushing Nick Swisher to first base.
Now I know in the past we were left handed heavy, but right now, other than switch hitters, and Kotsay, who is on the DL, what other lefties do we have besides Chavy
by theblackpearl on Mar 31, 2007 10:40 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, look at the lineup...
R Kendall
R Stewart
S Bradley
R Piazza
L Chavez
S Swisher
R Crosby
L Whomever
R Ellis
So yeah, you're right.
by Zonis on Mar 31, 2007 11:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
DJ...
oh wait.
yeah, we're REALLY left-handed heavy in the lineup, just like our starting rotation ;)
by Christine on Apr 1, 2007 1:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kielty is a poor defender by every measure
And by David Pinto's probalistic model of range, he's atrocious.
And THAT was in left field. I really don't want to see him holding down right.
You don't want Kielty playing every day. He is only worth having on the field on days when his bat is very valuable (.900 ops)- when he's facing lefties.
When Kielty gets starts against righties, he becomes our worst fielder and arguably the worst hitter in the lineup.
That's an unacceptable combo, and the reason that he must be platooned.
by notsellingjeans on Mar 31, 2007 10:42 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
<cough> Walker <cough>
Who would you rather have on the field? Kielty in Right with Swisher at First, or Swisher in Right and Walker at First? Defensively liability or not, I'll take Kielty hobbling around on his hands and knees than Walker. Besides, Swisher and Ellis have great range leaving less ground for The Clown to cover.
by DMOAS on Mar 31, 2007 10:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What?
The range of your second baseman and your first baseman only impact the rightfielder on bloop hits. Those represent little of the ground a rightfielder typically covers. Few, if any, worry about the range of their infielders when deciding which outfielders to play.
Have you ever seen Walker play first? He's better defensively at first than DJ is.
by IndianaAsfan on Apr 1, 2007 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, and your use for Kielty is also safer ..
You don't want Kielty playing every day. He is only worth having on the field on days when his bat is very valuable (.900 ops)- when he's facing lefties.
.. especially don't want a guy coming off of knee surgery and being asked to play everyday .. we got enough injury woes as is ..
by Randy Bell on Mar 31, 2007 10:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kielty plays the field like...
a double amputee. I personally believe he shouldn't make the team let alone start for us. This is a F-ing disaster.
by jjham15 on Mar 31, 2007 10:46 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I love it
Dan Johnson's batting eighth on the brand new Opening Day hype page.
by scutaroknowstheway on Mar 31, 2007 10:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Walker is guaranteed to be the ML roster
He wouldn't have signed with us if he wasn't, and he wouldn't have flown out for one game to play first if he wasn't.
He's getting a crash course at first base because Beane has promised him a spot on the 25-man and promised him at least a part in a platoon at first.
Walker will be fine in a few weeks, tops. The transition from second base to first is not nearly as hard as Hatteberg's transition from CATCHER to first.
He's moving from an incredibly taxing defensive position to arguably the easiest one on the field. I promise you he'll be considered a VERY GOOD defensive first baseman by mid-season. That's a guarantee.
Something encouraging about Walker - we're getting him for pennies, and this guy was due to make 4 million from the Padres.
by notsellingjeans on Mar 31, 2007 10:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Now that's more like it, thanks nsj !!
.. I like your positive note .. and wouldn't be surprised if you are pretty much reading Beane's mind ..
by Randy Bell on Mar 31, 2007 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Completely disagree
If Walker had half of Mark Ellis' skills then yes, he'd be fine at First. But Walker doesn't. He has trouble handling the routine ground ball at 2nd. That doesn't translate well at first when balls are thrown in the dirt frequently. If Wash were still around then maybe, but he isn't.
And if Walker was guaranteed the spot, he'd have a major league deal. This was a trial run nothing more. He still might make the team, but if he does and he gets significant time at 1st, it'll be a disaster.
by DMOAS on Mar 31, 2007 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Transition? Crash course?
Walker needs neither...Dude played 40 games at 1B last year...he did all that last year.
by OaktownPower on Mar 31, 2007 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"crash" seems an appropriate word
when talking about Walker's defense
by OaklandSi on Apr 1, 2007 12:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
not that i necessarily disagree with you
and if walker has already played first base for 40 games, how good is he according to david pinto's probabilistic model of range?
by xbhaskarx on Apr 1, 2007 8:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is it just me?
I am a little confused by the A's signing Durazo, watching him have a productive spring, then deciding to sign Walker so they could give Durazo his release. Is there a point to all this? Or did Ruby do something that warranted his release? Is it simply because they view Walker as having more value?
Color me confused, cause I really just don't get it.
by alox on Mar 31, 2007 10:51 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Walker has been playing in MLB, Ruby not?
.. maybe they didn't anticipate getting someone like Walker off the waiver wire at such a late date as this? And seized the opportunity when it arose? Ruby was one option, but the A's brass viewed Walker as the better option?
by Randy Bell on Mar 31, 2007 10:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've said this elsewhere
but Ruby did not have a productive spring. He had an excellent week and a half. Taken as a whole, he had a .288 OBP this spring. That's awful at any position, let alone first base.
by Nate on Mar 31, 2007 11:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
so much for spring training not meaning
anything when trying to make a club...
by OaklandSi on Apr 1, 2007 12:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not uncommon for non-roster invitees
Guys fitting the Durazo profile--free agent big league vets without a lot of teams interested in them--often sign this kind of deal. Rather than auditioning for a spot on the A's, Ruby was really auditioning for all 30 clubs...hence the understanding, also common in such deals, that he could request and receive his release if the A's weren't going to give him a 25 man roster spot.
What will be interesting to see is whether his spring (and Mex league winter) were enough to get a spot with any of the other teams, or whether the A's were just his last best hope.
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Apr 1, 2007 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They were planning on scouring the waiver wire
all along.
They had 39 spots on the 40-man roster - knowing that some ML team would probably release a guy who was good enough to make their team.
When Walker got released, which I'm sure was a possibly the A's had considered at the start of ST, they were ready to pounce.
Walker ended up being the best guy who got released. If the best guy released had been a high-ceiling reliever, or any other spot, they probably would've added that guy.
You'd have to argue this - of every player who was released, across the entire league, none has the track record Walker does.
He's potentially an .800-.825 OPS guy as half of a platoon, and could become a very good defender at his new position. No one else who was released can say that.
by notsellingjeans on Mar 31, 2007 11:00 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Ugh
I really am not looking forward to seeing Walker in the lineup. ZiPs projects him at .270/.344/.381. That's mediocre for a 2B, and wretched at 1B. At least Durazo would have been more likely to hit a little (ZiPs = .279/.363/.425).
by MrIncognito on Mar 31, 2007 11:00 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
but
pecota .268/.345/.402
bill james .280/.352/.423
do those change now that he's out of petco? no idea.
and durazo has essentially been out of baseball for almost two years, i don't know if i'd rely too much on what some projection thinks he'll do.
by xbhaskarx on Apr 1, 2007 8:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kielty still has an option left
So technically for the 2nd season in a row he can be sent to Sac to start the season. If they kept Buck to start in Right and Walker to ride the pine, Kielty could re-hab the knee for as long as he needs or as long as the team doesn't need him.
by DMOAS on Mar 31, 2007 11:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Which, again, is 40-man roster manipulation
The A's manage the 40-man better than anybody.
Tonight I'm gonna research transitions to first base and post a diary on them. That's how good my social life is. Saturday night. 11 p.m. West Coast time. 24 years old. I'm researching late career position changes.
Off the top of my head, though, I'll just say this:
Albert Pujols was not good enough defensively to play third base. He switched to first base, and quickly became one of the best defensive first basemen in baseball - the BEST according to David Pinto's probalistic model of range.
If you take a third baseman, short stop, or second baseman, and you switch him to first - he probably has the potential to be "above-average" defensively, relative to who he's competing against - the lumbering guys that most people put there.
by notsellingjeans on Mar 31, 2007 11:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
we should just get albert pujols
by xbhaskarx on Apr 1, 2007 8:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We should get Pujols and Ryan Howard
and platoon THEM!
by notsellingjeans on Apr 1, 2007 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Howard would make us too left hand heavy
by theblackpearl on Apr 1, 2007 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
we could put him on a diet
by xbhaskarx on Apr 1, 2007 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Buck
Buck in left and Swisher at first is by far the best option but everyone seems to have already accepted the fact that Buck will start the season in Sac.
by BillyMac on Mar 31, 2007 11:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
NSJ said it well...
by mikeA on Apr 1, 2007 12:22 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm appalled by the lack of recognition
of platoon splits and relative importance of first base defense. Let me give you a list of teams who sacrifice offense for defense at first:
New York Yankees
Okay, that's it. A Walker-Swisher platoon will more or less approximate DJ. The real tragedy will be if Buck makes the team. He really doesn't seem ready for the big show yet.
by salb918 on Apr 1, 2007 4:34 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
A platoon may work
As usual, you are a voice of reason. If Kielty plays right against LH pitchers with Swisher playing 1B, Walker at 1B with Swisher at right against RH pitchers is not so bad. Of course, this all depends on Bradley and Stewart staying healthy, which is hoping for something that has not happened in the past few seasons.
by BlameChannel53 on Apr 1, 2007 6:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Platoon might even be better than DJ
2006 vs LHP (Kielty): .325/.358/.607
2006 vs RHP (Walker): .302/.368/.425
If we go with a strict platoon--let each of these guys do the thing he can still do well and not let him do the thing they can't do well--that position could actually be an offensive strength rather than a somewhat-papered-over weakness. And for damn cheap, too.
by Faust on Apr 1, 2007 7:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
not just better, but healthier team-wise
.. I know I sound like "broken record" repetition but just as reminder, Kielty is coming off of knee surgery and shouldn't be overused even if it was justified numbers- /stat-wise {which is clearly not justified due to his poor hitting record against righties and his overall defense}.
by Randy Bell on Apr 1, 2007 7:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
On paper, it does look pretty dandy
The only thing we have to remember is that this arrangement only works when everyone is healthy. Stewart is going to need days off, and so will Bradley, and that's when we end up with Kielty hitting left-handed and Walker facing lefthanders.
by BlameChannel53 on Apr 1, 2007 7:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
When Stewart needs days off...
We need to be playing guys like Antonio Perez and Melhuse MORE.
Part of why Melhuse and Perez were terrible last year was that they didn't get enough at-bats to stay sharp (I realize this is a double-edged sword; if they had hit better, they'd get more ABs).
Look at Melhuse's best year - he had over 200 ABs. A study I would like to see is, "What is the baseline # of at-bats the average ML bench-player needs to stay sharp and play up to his optimal effectiveness?" I'm certain it's more than the 100 Perez got last year.
More rest for Stewart = find a way to get Perez more at-bats.
The more he gets, the more likely it is that he gets a chance to show that he's a legimate major leaguer.
Buck needs to the absolute LAST resort.
by notsellingjeans on Apr 1, 2007 8:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
this assumes Perez returns soon
from his absence from the A's due to a "non-baseball condition"
He's been away from the team for several days now...
by OaklandSi on Apr 1, 2007 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ken is, as usual, very insightful.
I had the same thought last night as did countless othe A's fans. To recap my position briefly:
- (Walker+Kielty) ~ (DJ or Buck) offensively and defensively
- Durazo had a pretty bad spring training
- Preserves our flexibility to call up Buck when we please
- Walker is an easy DFA candidate if/when DJ comes back
by salb918 on Apr 1, 2007 8:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Converted first basemen (Walker's predecessors)
The best example of course is Pujols, a converted third baseman who has become, according to David Pinto's PMR, the best defensive first baseman in the game.
Others who have made the switch from middle infield to playing first base at least part-time include:
Rich Aurilia
Nomar Garciaparra
Jeff Kent
Howie Kendrick (at times last year)
Ty Wigginton
That list intentionally doesn't include OFs who convert to first base full or part-time. Those guys often convert for a different reason.
What that list DOES show is that the A's are not being nuts. There is certainly precedent. First base is a logical transition for a guy who no longer has the range for middle infield, and who's team has a need for .800 OPS production at first.
by notsellingjeans on Apr 1, 2007 8:18 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The Problems those guys had
at their original position were A) poor throwing capabilities B) lack of/reduced range C) a combo of the two.
Walker's poor defense concerns his ability to carry out the basic and fundamental task of acquiring a routine groundball usually direct at or near him.
This doesn't translate well to receiving throws near and directly at him at First. Nor does it translate well to the grounders at First. I'd rather see Melhuse converted to First than Walker.
by DMOAS on Apr 1, 2007 9:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Walker has already played 1B
he has proven to be a defensive liability regardless of where he plays...he's in MLB for his bat
by OaklandSi on Apr 1, 2007 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ron Washington
Something I have to dispute that's been written here a few times in the last 24 hours...
Ron Washington is a great guy. He knows a lot about the game. He helped Chavvy take his defense to another level, and they built up a rapport. By all accounts he was pretty fun to hang out with, in addition to being a good coach.
He's also not the only guy who knows how to coach infield defense! Ron Washington didn't have a monopoly on teaching people how to pick grounders at first. Walker will not tragically be unable to make the transition to first because Ron Washington is now giving Hank Blalock pats on the butt rather than Chavvy.
I don't even know who the hell our infield coach is right now, and I follow the A's pretty closely. What I do know is, whoever he is, can teach Todd Walker how to pick grounders just as well as Ron Washington can.
The X factor is how much work Walker puts in, just like it was for Hatteberg. Hatteberg worked hard and became very good at it. Good scouting, above average athleticism, good work ethic. That's why Hatteberg worked. Not fairy dust in Ron Washington's armpit.
Walker is a professional who has pride, and who recognizes this as maybe his last chance to ply his trade as a professional hitter. I'm sure he'll work hard too.
by notsellingjeans on Apr 1, 2007 8:27 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree. This has been bugging me for a while
Wash being gone does not eliminate our coaching crew's ability to teach guys stuff. Wash may have had a talent for instruction, but he doesn't have a magic wand, and he's not the only guy out there who can help guys figure out how to play a new position.
by Elvez on Apr 1, 2007 8:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Walker has played first before
in addition to other infield positions.
He has played with several teams, and has been on them for his offense -- definitely not for his defense.
Hatty had not played first before Wash worked with him. Perez was not terrible defensively before working with Wash. and Chavvy was very young and coming up when he worked with Wash.
I don't think even having Wash as the infield coach would significantly change Walker's skills in the infield.
by OaklandSi on Apr 1, 2007 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you're right
but wash will singlehandedly propel the rangers to first place in the AL west this year.
by xbhaskarx on Apr 1, 2007 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow!!!
Kendall/Crosby for Johnson Trade!!!! See my diary!!!!
by since72 on Apr 1, 2007 9:16 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Actually, seeing "Johnson,"
Apparently, it's hard to keep your Johnson healthy--which explains a lot of the spam I get.
by Nico on Apr 1, 2007 9:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's get this straight,
by ak_A on Apr 1, 2007 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
:)
So is adding walker to our roster also an april fools joke?
by bkrawez on Apr 1, 2007 9:25 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Just out of curiosity,
by Nico on Apr 1, 2007 9:30 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
shawn green in a month
by xbhaskarx on Apr 1, 2007 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
making breakfast
but meanwhile here's a link:
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/trans
by OaklandSi on Apr 1, 2007 9:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
not a single OF on that list
so again, shawn green in a month.
hey, beane did try to get snelling just a few days ago but bowden was asking for too much.
by xbhaskarx on Apr 1, 2007 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, there's
by Nico on Apr 1, 2007 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
we could grab joe smith from the mets
of course we might have to give up our first round draft picks for the next decade, but it wouldn't hurt beane's GM rating.
(damnit, i did a match case "find" for OF earlier)
by xbhaskarx on Apr 1, 2007 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
only if Kevin Mchale is the GM, and the Joe Smith
is 6'10
by theblackpearl on Apr 1, 2007 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
kevin mchale, best GM in professional sports
according to every proprietary GM rating system.
by xbhaskarx on Apr 1, 2007 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
hmmm, that was good
oh sorry, Nico, didn't see your post -- did you want breakfast?
Now looking at that link; a couple of OFers, but obviously nothing that would have inspired the A's.
I'm curious as to whether Jason Stokes (the players that the A's acquired in exchange for Baker) is in fill-in plans at all. Just briefly checked him out -- he's a first baseman who was a first round draft choice and is considered to have a bit of pop.
by OaklandSi on Apr 1, 2007 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Carlos Pena
Interesting to see Pena's name on the transactions list though apparently as one staying instead of going. The fact that I even considered a Kielty / Pena platoon has to be discouraging. On the positive (or at least Angel neagative) side ... Colon, Weaver, and Figgins start the year on the DL.
by Larry E on Apr 1, 2007 10:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
don't forget juan rivera
.. broke one of his wheels in winterball ..
by Randy Bell on Apr 1, 2007 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
none of this is positive, of course
it's never good to see players get injured
by OaklandSi on Apr 1, 2007 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed ..
.. just that if it has to happen, PLEASE let the baseball gods spread the misery around and not just plague the A's ..
by Randy Bell on Apr 1, 2007 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm generally not superstitious
except for baseball, when I'm totally superstitious, especially about jinxing players!
by OaklandSi on Apr 1, 2007 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
<Standing O>
for whoever added the big head and little arms tag.
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Apr 1, 2007 10:35 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
T-Buck made the team!
by Randy Bell on Apr 1, 2007 11:33 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Loiaza on DL, Gaudin gets 4th start
by Randy Bell on Apr 1, 2007 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perez designated for assignment
by Randy Bell on Apr 1, 2007 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess his "non-baseball condition"
was significant
by OaklandSi on Apr 1, 2007 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, well
now it's a "no baseball condition."
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Apr 1, 2007 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lenny DiNardo made the team
by Randy Bell on Apr 1, 2007 11:36 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Jay Marshall made the team
by Randy Bell on Apr 1, 2007 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kielty made the team!
Halsey got sent down. Here's the link, now someone make a diary, I can't get it to work for me.
by Philip Christy on Apr 1, 2007 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i cant make it work either...
by Mantecan As Fan on Apr 1, 2007 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Full 25-Man Roster
PITCHERS (12)
15 Dan Haren, RHP
20 Huston Street, RHP
37 Joe Kennedy, LHP
40 Rich Harden, RHP
41 Alan Embree, LHP
45 Jay Witasick, RHP
50 Kiko Calero, RHP
52 Jay Marshall, LHP
55 Joe Blanton, RHP
56 Lenny DiNardo, LHP
57 Chad Gaudin, RHP
58 Justin Duchscherer, RHP
CATCHERS
17 Adam Melhuse, C
18 Jason Kendall, C
INFIELDERS
3 Eric Chavez, 3B
7 Bobby Crosby, SS
12 Todd Walker, IF
14 Mark Ellis, 2B
19 Marco Scutaro, IF
31 Mike Piazza, DH
OUTFIELDERS
6 Travis Buck, OF
22 Milton Bradley, OF
23 Bobby Kielty, OF
24 Shannon Stewart, OF
33 Nick Swisher, 1B/OF
by DMOAS on Apr 1, 2007 11:39 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
As Fun as Watching
25 post, one for each player, this is probably easier ;)
by DMOAS on Apr 1, 2007 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Please keep Ellis, Crosby and Chavvy healthy
I'd hate to see Walker at any other position besides 1B (not that 1B excites me either, but the other positions would be worse)
by OaklandSi on Apr 1, 2007 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Walker won't play anything but 1B
unless it's a true emergency like two players getting hurt in the same game. If anything happens to one of those three, Scutaro is the one who's going to be getting the playing time.
by Nate on Apr 1, 2007 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
anyone else having problems posting a diary about
by Mantecan As Fan on Apr 1, 2007 11:40 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I guess
only the special ones can post a diary on AN. Oh, great and noble Blez, when will you let me into your realm of diary publishing??
by Philip Christy on Apr 1, 2007 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Buck
I just love the fact that we're keeping Travis Buck! But we've gotta come up with a few good nicknames for him...
Anyone?
by anAfromfaraway on Apr 1, 2007 12:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Whenever Travis Buck comes to bat
The chant in the stands could be "Buck you Angels!" ..or the appropriate opponent name.
...just a thought...
by One won lost won on Apr 1, 2007 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
hehe
by Randy Bell on Apr 1, 2007 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
travis buckle
by xbhaskarx on Apr 1, 2007 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You talkin to me?
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Apr 1, 2007 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But Chuck Buck would be a cool name :o)
by anAfromfaraway on Apr 1, 2007 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe it should just be "$$$"?!?
by anAfromfaraway on Apr 1, 2007 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about
"$" the player formerly known as Antonio Perez.
by BlameChannel53 on Apr 1, 2007 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Two-Chuck Buck?
How about "Travis Buck(le) as in "Bickle" (Taxi Driver)
by One won lost won on Apr 1, 2007 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
who care about Durazo...
Congrats to T-Buck for making the roster!
by fathobo on Apr 1, 2007 12:15 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 























