What's In A Cactus League Number?
I'm of the mindset not to give spring training stats more than a cursory glance. Sometimes, especially with players fighting for a roster spot, I'll look at some elements of "overall performance," such as Ryan Goleski's inability to make enough contact or Joe Kennedy's extreme inability to get anyone out at all ever not even occasionally (until after this post was written last night, anyway). These are among the few results I feel have some--though still not all that much--relevance. For those inclined to give much more credence to Cactus League numbers, here are some helpful reminders from the Cactus League, circa 2006:
* Dan Johnson hit .356, then proceded, in the regular season, to keep grounding both baseballs he saw to the second baseman. One limitation of spring training stats is that it tends to show how well you can hit AAAA pitching, not major league pitching, so Johnson's solid Cactus League stats don't really prove what he most needs to prove: that he is better than a AAAA hitter.
* Jason Kendall and Antonio Perez hit .308 and .232, but not respectively. It was Kendall who hit only .232, and Perez who nearly tripled his regular season average in spring training.
* Kiko Calero posted a 9.64 ERA, nearly matched by Chad Gaudin's 7.43 ERA. Both went on to have fine seasons. Joe Blanton won 16 regular season games following a spring in which his Cactus League ERA was 6.45. However, in spring training Blanton did accurately foreshadow that he was inclined to give out more hits than a crack dealer in the Tenderloin.
* Milton Bradley and Frank Thomas each batted .167, while Mark Ellis hit .347, yet it was Thomas and Ellis who got off to painfully slow starts.
So whether you want to use this information to chill out about Blanton and Kennedy or to worry that Piazza and Johnson will slump in April, sometimes it's just good to remember: We've been following the A's games with great interest for a month, and we actually don't know anything.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm Encouraged that Swish and DJ seem to ..
.. be using the whole field .. that was their biggest weakness during their rookie years .. I hope they will show much improvement this year by going the other way with the outside pitch, the off-speed pitch {when fooled}, etc ..
by Randy Bell on Mar 27, 2007 5:22 PM PDT reply actions
Nice post
Nico...and this is something I've been intending to do for a while.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Mar 27, 2007 6:08 PM PDT reply actions
did you just use JB's win total
as evidence for not putting too much thought into ST stats?
Gross.
by fadedash on Mar 27, 2007 6:28 PM PDT reply actions
He never said Joe B. was a good pitcher.
He simply said he won games.
by baseballgirl on Mar 27, 2007 9:04 PM PDT up reply actions
Precisely--and Blanton
So as poorly as Blanton has pitched this spring, his performance "portends" about 16 wins as much as it portends a 4.82 ERA, and vice-versa.
All of which is to say, fadedash, that if you want to have credibility you might want to pick your spots and not just post antagonistically left and right (though it does, I suppose, make you a switch-hitter). Toodles for now.
I still don't get it
So, what you're basically saying is that JB had a bad spring last year and still won 16 games. So don't worry about a bad spring this year, because it projects to 16 wins? I still find that gross, if that's what you're saying.
Which brings me to my other point. Can I not say that without you feeling antagonized? If I don't agree with you that means I'm not credible?
I'll be sure to apply for my posting license after I complete your 6 week credibility course. Are the classroom sizes small? I really enjoy the personal connection. Do you think I should put it on my resume when I graduate? Will it allow me to add a title to my business cards? <----That is antagonistic</p>
by fadedash on Mar 28, 2007 12:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Try this: ST is all sound and fury, signifying...
...nothing.
IOW, nothing in Arizona seems to predict anything in the regular season--good, bad or indifferent. I think it may be because we're compounding small sample size, fitness at the start of camp, different preparation routines and philosophies, weak alignment around winning, etc. etc.
As to he who doth weareth yonder crankypantaloons, I can't help you, there.
by The Dogfather on Mar 28, 2007 4:27 AM PDT up reply actions
Dude, you rub people the wrong way all the time.
And it sure seems like you do it on purpose. Don't act all surprised when people get irritated at you for essentially playing devil's advocate and nit-picking someone's comments like you get paid to find mistakes.
No one cares that you disagree with... just about everything. The main issue is how you go about it. If you don't care that your attitude is abrasive and belittling, then you can't legitimately be shocked when people react to your manner more than your message.
You can be friendly or you can be an ass. Your intentions will be received and responded to accordingly. That's how communication works in our world. You can't just be learning this now.
Thank you, Elvez,
Sweet! The only other time I've been a hero...
was when I dressed up as Condom Man for Halloween at my Catholic high school. I had a pillowcase full of rubbers from Planned Parenthood, and I passed them out in the parking lot at lunch.
It's quite simple
Piazza and Swisher's spring stats are ironclad guarantees of awesome 2007 seasons. Chavez and Kennedy's numbers are meaningless. QED
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Mar 27, 2007 8:03 PM PDT reply actions
Last week, Beckett. Now da Bard? Okay, I'll play:
"What of The Game? A Rose by any other word would still be a cheat."
Yeah, too easy. Your turn.
Poor players, strutting and fretting their hour
on some shrimp?
by The Dogfather on Mar 28, 2007 4:41 AM PDT up reply actions
Oh, what's in a name?
Number. I mean, number.
Really, that was the first thing I thought of when I saw the title.
I think it's hard to judge what will happen during the regular season vs. ST if only because in ST guys are working on a lot of different things and experimenting, so what they decide to go with may not be what gives them success or malaise. Or something. I don't tend to trust ST numbers. Take a look at the Cards - Jason Marquis had a 1.96 ERA in ST last year and see what came out of that. So...
I am going to opening day!!!! At Coors Field! Thanks to my wonderful sister! I am just hoping it is the coolest thing ever because I am blowing off a mandatory musical rehearsal to go to it and I'm terrified that my director is NOT going to be pleased...
I'm sure your director
I think
what will convince her is that I haven't missed a practice yet and I know the choreography. lol, but I'm sure that the names that would convince her would be along the lines of Todd Helton...Matt Holliday, etc. I could always show her pictures of Holliday, Atkins, and Hawpe...
i still find it hard to believe that
his name is "Kiko". It can't be easy to pitch with a name like that.
Then again, i'm not yet over the name Mookie. Does anyone else have any favorite unlikely baseball names?
I think his real name is...
Enrique Nomar or something.
Um...Milton Bradley, anyone? ;-)
Coco Crisp?
Boof?
by baseballgirl on Mar 27, 2007 10:14 PM PDT up reply actions
24 Runs put on the Rangers
Look, I know it's only Spring Training, but did anyone notice the "24" the Padres PUT ON Kevin Millwood, Eric Gagne, Ron Mahay, and the Mighty Texas Rangers Pitching staff. That's pretty funny stuff.
I know that picking the Rangers to win the West is the "En Vogue" thing to do right now (Neyer), but how can that team with it's current pitching staff? Wash can't fix pitching. And Offensively, they're not as good as they were last year (GMJ + Carlos Lee + Kevin Mench is a downgrade offensively... especially Mench vs. the A's).
I think we can learn a little...
Namely, and this was an excellent point you brought up Nico, that Goleski not only isn't hitting, but has a very poor contact rate. (Two games ago, which was the last time I checked mlb.com, which unlike ESPN gives spring k's, he was at 14 strikeouts in 41 at-bats - not good).
I think we learned a few important things in spring:
a. Goleski isn't good enough to carry on the roster right now, especially since the OF is thin and brittle and our backup OFs will be getting important ABs.
b. Harden is healthy, and when he is healthy, he is still very dominant.
c. Durazo still has Tyrannasaurus Rex arms.
There may be a few other things we learned but clearly those three are the most salient.
by notsellingjeans on Mar 27, 2007 10:42 PM PDT reply actions
I'd like to add
Stewart looks fantastic. He's running hard all the time, rounding the bases well, doesnt favor or run cautiously on that foot.
by pickinmachine on Mar 28, 2007 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions
I never know anything...
so I'm already in midseason form.
Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to Opening Day.
good topic
Its easy to get distracted by ST numbers. Probably because most of us are desperate for baseball and when we see these extreme numbers, we start to play the 'what if' game. What if DJ can hit 30HR etc. As Nico points out, none of these stats matter, or effect performance on the regular season.


























