Batted Ball Profiles and What They Tell Us-- Part 3
We come to the end of our little odyssey through the world of batted ball types. Today we'll look at the final four major contributors to the A's roster last season, and I'll hand out my First Annual Batted Ball Awards (including the Jack Cust Contact Quality Award-- I bet nobody can guess who's winning that one). First, though, it's time to review our glossary of terms and our league medians. If you've read parts one and two, skip ahead to the Donnie Murphy section.
My apologies for how long it took me to post this; thanks to spending Christmas day with a bunch of small gremlins, I came down with a cold and didn't have the energy to finish working on it.
Glossary
Basic breakdown: What kinds of balls are guys hitting? LD is Line Drive percentage. (Very, very good.) GB is ground ball percentage. (Bad, unless you're Ichiro or Maurice Greene.) OFB is outfield fly ball percentage. (Usually about average, but very bad if you're Juan Pierre or Reggie Willits.) IFB is infield fly ball percentage. (Very, very bad. These are almost always pop-ups or foul-outs.)
Results: What happens to the balls when they land? HR/FB is the percentage of fly balls which are home runs. (Most non-homer fly balls end up being outs, so this tells you a lot about whether a guy is benefiting or hurting his team by hitting flies.) BABIP is Batting Average on Balls in Play. (It's a key component of a player's batting average.) OCSlg is Slugging Percentage On Contact. (When a guy actually hits a ball, how hard does he hit it? If anyone's wondering, the difference between "In Play" and "On Contact" is that the latter includes home runs and the former doesn't.)
League Medians (Among Qualified Players)
Line Drive: 18.8%
Ground Ball: 42.0%
Outfield Fly Balls: 35.0%
Infield Fly Balls: 3.9%
Home Runs per Fly Ball: 10.0%
BABIP: .312
I don't know what the median is for OCSlg, because I calculated that by hand. I seem to recall working out that league average was about .520 not too long ago, however.
One thing I don't think I've mentioned before-- league medians actually overstate some stats. In particular, HR/FB -- a lot of bench scrubs are terrible power hitters. They get a few at-bats here and there-- enough to pull down the average but not enough to actually qualify for the batting title. Unless they're Nick Punto, that is. (Someone explain Nick Punto to me. Please.) Keep it in mind when you're comparing hitters to the baseline figures.
Donnie Murphy
LD 19.3% (22.1%)
GB 34.9% (35.9%)
OFB 43.4% (38.2%)
IFB 2.4% (3.8%)
HR/FB 15.8% (5.4%)
BABIP .260 (.414)
OCSlg .626 (.679)
(Minors stats again in italics.)
If Dave Kingman played short, is this what he would look like?
We've got some contradictory data sets for Murphy's 2007. On the one hand, he hit like your typical shortstop in AAA-- high average, good contact, not much power. On the other hand, once he was called up to MLB, he started swinging for the fences. Not all that uncommon, except that in Murphy's case, he actually reached the fences. Whatever he was doing at the major league level, it seems to have worked. He goes into 2007 as (gulp) the probable best hitter at the shortstop position for Oakland.
I think he's going to have to tone down the homeruncentricity a bit, though. The key question is whether he can bring his other batted ball stats, particularly his BABIP, up as his HR/FB drops. He's not going to BABIP .414 at the major league level, that's for sure. But my spider sense (and his 5-foot-10 frame) tells me that he's not going to jack 15% of his fly balls, either. Hit a happy medium, around .320/10%, and he should claim the starting shortstop job from Bobby Crosby with ease.
Shannon Stewart
LD 21.4%
GB 44.5%
OFB 31.5%
IFB 2.6%
HR/FB 6.8%
BABIP .308
OCSlg .440
One of the interesting remaining decisions that the A's need to make this offseason is whether to resign Shannon Stewart. I know everyone's first thought-- what on earth do the A's need with another corner outfielder? Obviously, a re-sign would not be for purposes of improving the team. What it would do, though, is give the team some control over a commodity which could later be used as trade bait.
Then again, limp-wristed (and noodle-armed) left fielders are not exactly in the highest of demand. Stewart's spread of 132 points between his BABIP and OCSlg is pretty miserable. It's nice to be able to "put it where they ain't," but it would be nicer if it was far enough away from where they "is" to enable him to get to second base.
Stewart's batted ball numbers recentered on his career marks this last season; his liners were way down in his injury-riddled 2006 but popped back up in 2007. I think it's pretty safe to say that the guy we saw last year is the same guy that whoever signs him will be getting in 2008.
Right now I'm inclined toward letting him walk and taking the comp pick, but you never know who might find themselves needing a .750 OPS from an outfielder. Certainly if he's still unsigned by the time compensation picks expire (anyone know when that might be?) I'd offer him either 1/$5M or 2/$7M. It's only money, after all.
Kurt Suzuki
LD 15.9% (20.1%)
GB 39.2% (47.9%)
OFB 42.1% (26.0%)
IFB 2.8% (5.9%)
HR/FB 8.9% (6.8%)
BABIP .275 (.337)
OCSlg .500 (.452)
Bad news for Kurt Klutch fans-- these numbers predict a regression next year. Or, to put a slightly more optimistic spin on things, Suzuki is going to have to improve to stay the same (does that make sense?). His line drive rate at the major league level was troublingly low, and he didn't hit for a lot of power at AAA.
There are some encouraging signs here, but overall very few of Suzuki's offensive numbers are above average. Suzuki is still pretty young, especially for a collegian, so he has some time to work on squaring pitches up. With his fairly small frame, I doubt he'll be a dominant power threat (although he showed flashes of very good power last season), so the most important thing for Suzuki is to work on upping that line drive count toward where it was in AAA. If he can do that and play quality defense at catcher, he'll be a more than adequate solution at the position, even if he's not likely to hit higher than 7th in the order.
Nick Swisher
LD 17.5%
GB 36.9%
OFB 41.3%
IFB 4.3%
HR/FB 11.6%
BABIP .308
OCSlg .600
A puzzling season for Nick Swisher. Despite more or less maintaining his batted-ball ratios (his liners did drop a little, but not very much) and actually increasing his batting average by about 10 points, his slugging percentage dropped like a weighted rock.
His HR/FB ratio dropped by over 1/3, from 17.9% to 11.6%. More than anything else, this explains his struggles at the plate at times this year. Balls which were leaving the yard in 2006 were getting caught for loud outs in 2007. It's possible that a portion of this was injury-related; he had some hamstring issues and at times looked noticeably hobbled at the plate. But that can't be the full story.
My personal theory is that Swish was simply trying too hard. Baseball is not a game where throwing every ounce of effort into your swing is likely to produce a desired result. Some combination of Bradley's injuries and subsequent trade, and his big new contract, seems to have caused Swisher to start pressing. From about the last week of May to the All-Star break, he was stone cold terrible.
How does this translate into the numbers we see above? Well, if he was swinging under balls to try to loft them for home runs, perhaps that caused his home run numbers to perversely decline as he hit more high cans of corn to the outfielders. Looking at the chart of his fly ball rates over the entire season, his flies stayed fairly close to his season rate during the midseason slump-- but none of them were leaving the park.
It is, as they say, just a theory-- but I think the evidence supports it somewhat.
The Groundies
Yes, it's time to hand out the awards for best and worst performance in each category. Again, let me emphasize that grounders and flies don't exist in a stable relationship with each other. Some guys do great hitting lots of grounders; others need to lift the ball for success. If there's one thing I hope we've all learned from this process, it's that there are many ways to succeed at hitting-- and the most important person in the process is the hitter himself. To badly paraphrase Sun Tzu, know yourself and the enemy and you will OPS .900; know one but not the other and you will be average; know neither and you will OPS .600.
Now, the awards (and vaguely topical/amusing commentary about them):
Tony Gwynn Frozen Rope Award (Best LD%): Jack Hannahan
Daric Barton just misses out on this one, because his LD% in the minors was "only" 21.2%.
Tennessee Women's Softball Team Slap-Hitting Award (Worst LD%): Kurt Suzuki
Did you know that there are entire instruction manuals written about the art of slap-hitting in softball? Apparently the key is to start running forward before the pitch even reaches the plate.
Frank Thomas Thank God I Hit Fly Balls All The Time Because I Couldn't Beat Out a Grounder if My Life Depended On It Award (Highest OFB%/Lowest GB%): Mark Ellis
Frank Thomas has hit over 50% fly balls in every full season that he's played since people started keeping track of this stuff-- and a good thing, too.
Reggie Willits I Can't Hit the Ball More Than Ten Feet In The Air Award (Lowest OFB%/Highest GB%): Bobby Crosby
How does Reggie Willits lead a team in pitches per plate appearance? Can't the pitchers just throw heat high in the strike zone? Why would you ever throw a pitch that WASN'T a strike to Reggie Willits?
Meineke Car Care Clutch Award (Lowest IFB%): Jack Cust
Hey, if all the bowl games can sell off their naming rights, why can't I?
Oh, right. I didn't get a cent for this.
Fuck you, Meineke.
Robby Thompson I Wish I Was Playing in Old Candlestick Park So Some Of These Would Drop Safely Award (highest IFB%): Eric Chavez
Back before they had hot dog races, they had hot dog wrapper races out at the 'Stick. Boy, am I ever glad I never went to night games as a child. I doubt my delicate constitution could have handled it.
Dave Kingman Fly Balls are Scared of Me So They Hide in the Stands Award (highest HR/FB%): Jack Cust
There are exactly two player-seasons since 2002 in which a player hit a higher percentage of his fly balls for homers: Jim Thome's 2002 and Ryan Howard's 2006.
Duane Kuiper Couldn't Get it Out If The Bat Was Rocket-Assisted Award (lowest HR/FB%): Mark Kotsay
Ironically, I actually saw Kotsay's one homer this season; it was off Brad Lidge to send a game against the Astros to extra innings. The A's somehow ended that game with Jason Kendall playing the outfield. Needless to say, that did not work out well.
Derek Jeter If I Hit Like This Perhaps People Will Forget About My Defense Award (highest BABIP): Jack Cust, Jack Hannahan and Daric Barton
I'm declaring this one a three-way tie, since they were all pretty close and I'm not sure how much to weigh minor league stats here.
Jeromy Burnitz National Hit Like A Pirate Day Award (lowest BABIP): Mark Kotsay
Aarrgh.
Get it? Pirate? Aarrgh? It's a double entendre. See?
[ducks]
Jack Cust Contact Quality Award (highest OCSlg): Jack Cust
Well, shoot the horse and slap me silly. Whouda thunk.
Juan Pierre Contact Whatever the Exact Opposite of Quality Is Award (lowest OCSlg): Mark Kotsay
Impressively, Kotsay sweeps the negative "results" section of the Groundies. If Jason Kendall was still on the team, he might have given Kotsay a run for his money. As it is, he stands alone at the top of a pyramid of utter futility.
That's all for our excursion into batted ball data and its lessons. I hope you found this interesting and informative; it was certainly interesting, informative, and-- dare I say it-- fun to write.
0 recs |
20 comments
Comments
Alternative sponsors
Now that Marco's gone it's harder, but maybe Clutchmasters.com can kick you a little somethin-somethin for the Jack Cust Award.
As for Meineke, specializing in mufflers, I believe a certain South Side Chicago manager is in desperate need of their services.
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Dec 31, 2007 12:50 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Tony Gwynn Memorial, etc?
You aren't supposed to name something "Memorial" unless the guy is dead ...
by devo on Dec 31, 2007 1:09 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
He's dead to me
after his announcing performance in the playoffs...
Actually, I just used the term to denote "retired."
by PaulThomas on Dec 31, 2007 1:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's okay to imply that Tony Gwynn, et al
are dead, by completely misusing the term "memorial" but not to use fundamentals in a commonly understood, though not entirely correct manner?
by devo on Dec 31, 2007 1:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sure I've seen "memorial" used to refer
to non-dead (but presumably retired) people before...
If anything, it's probably the same phenomenon as in the other thread-- interpreting a word's meaning literally. Or, as many would argue, over-literally.
Eh. I'll just edit it out. It looks kind of silly to me too. At least it gave me a chance to crack a cheap joke...
by PaulThomas on Dec 31, 2007 1:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He was terrible, wasn't he?
All these years, all these lovingly relayed sportswriter anecdotes about what a brilliant, incisive student of the game the guy is, about the hours upon hours spent immersed in videotape, about how you'd learn more about pitch sequences and hitting mechanics standing next him for five minutes at BP than you could ever hope to absorb in twenty lifetimes ... after all that, he gets into the broadcast booth, and it's nothing but a squeaky voice stammering platitudes and banal repetitions of action ("you see how he hit the ball to the right side there, and ended up at first base").
Also: Excellent diary series, though I have, sorry to say, nothing of substance to contribute to the discussion (unless unhinged Tony Gwynn hostility counts as "substantive").
by 74mk on Dec 31, 2007 1:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
With Swisher, I wonder if one side of the plate
was that much worse than the other, it seemed he struggled this year as a leftie. I wonder if the shoulder problems he had affected his left handed swing more than his right, because he was a lot closer in OBP, and SLG, from both sides in other yeats.
by theblackpearl on Dec 31, 2007 1:14 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Shoulder problems?
This is the first I've heard of him having shoulder problems.
by PaulThomas on Dec 31, 2007 1:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Would it surprise you?
I mean really? Brilliant diary by the way. I really love this stuff.
by alox on Dec 31, 2007 1:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd be interested...
in seeing the batted ball profile of Jason Kendall, just to see that GB% and Infield Fly Ball% he had. I'm sure he would take the cake in those two categories and isolated slugging and set every benchmark for this team - in a very negative way.
I don't think the team should consider re-signing Shannon Stewart. With Buck, Kotsay, Denorfia, Cust, Swisher and DJ slated for the OF/DH spots, Oakland will not have the roster space to add another defensively limited outfielder to the mix, no matter how much of a "known quantity" he is. I'd rather see Putnam and/or Robnett be given at bats in place of Stewart, especially in a losing season.
Further, it would be really interesting to do a near-reverse study of these numbers to see which pitchers on the A's staff limit line drives, induce ground balls and pop-ups and keep the ball in the park. I guess we have an idea as to those numbers just by rate stats, but a more in-depth analysis would be interesting...not that I'm trying to goad you into more work or anything!
Really appreciate the whole series. well done!
by Taj Adib on Dec 31, 2007 1:47 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Kendall's stats:
LD 18.5%
GB 43.9%
OFB 34.3%
IFB 3.3%
HR/FB 1.9%
BABIP .261
OCSlg .340
Kendall is about the best example I can come up with for why ground balls and fly balls can each be more valuable for different players. This year he added 12% of fly balls, losing 5% off his LD rate and 7% off his GB rate. That many fly balls from a guy with his HR/FB ratio basically poleaxed his batting average.
On Stewart-- I'd rather keep him than Kotsay. $4.5 million worth of rather? Not sure about that.
I'm considering doing a reverse series for pitchers; we'll have to see if I have time.
by PaulThomas on Dec 31, 2007 2:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
With the way outfielders can play Kendall
anything in the air that's 15 feet onto the OF grass will end up as a "fly-ball".
by Nick on Dec 31, 2007 6:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Kendall probably loses a lot of
potential ground balls because OFers can play him in front of the mound and catch a lot of those balls in the air.
by Nico on Dec 31, 2007 9:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely terrific, Paul
I thoroughly enjoyed all three parts.
On a completely unrelated note, do you or any other ANers happen to know what happened to Jose Garcia, the Marlins guy that we added to our 40-man, then had to release from the 40-man? Were we able to get him trough waivers and to Sacramento, like we were with Jay Marshall...or he solemnly roaming free somewhere?
I haven't seen an article with his name in it since we DFA'd him.
Even hurt, I thought he had some very interesting upside down the road.
by notsellingjeans on Jan 1, 2008 6:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
BB's new strategy...
claim bargains off of "trough waivers," players you pay for by the pound.
by skutch on Jan 1, 2008 9:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He's now a free agent
He was not tendered a contract at the deadline. I'm guessing that the A's want to resign him for a minor league deal, but he wants to see if he can get onto someone's 40-man roster. But that's pure speculation on my part.
by PaulThomas on Jan 1, 2008 11:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Very likely true
Do teams have a ceiling of what they're allowed to pay players signed to minor league contracts? I'd assume they probably do, in order to prevent teams from having a de facto "41st man" in the system whom they sign to a minor-league deal for a guaranteed ~$500,000.
I'm familiar with the concept of split contracts, and also with structuring deals like Sammy Sosa's with Texas last year, where you bring a guy to camp as an NRI but offer him an incentive-based contract if he makes the big club out of spring. But neither of those scenarios would apply to Jose Garcia, because if he needs surgery, he won't be playing on a major league roster in '08 anyway.
My point is, what can the A's offer him in terms of "incentive" to sign? Are they allowed to offer a minor league player a bonus...or do all minor league players w/o major league deals make the same amount of money as everybody else at their level?
Because if the A's can't offer him any incentives, and the rest of the league was offering him minor-league deals anyway, it seems like he'd just re-sign closer to home, perhaps even with Florida again.
by notsellingjeans on Jan 2, 2008 12:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think there's a MiLB contract ceiling...
Roger Clemens was technically signed to a minor league contract last season-- albeit one that paid him at a rate of $27 million for a full season...
Maybe it was some kind of split contract, but I was under the definite impression that he was getting paid for his minor league "buildup" starts at the full rate.
Garcia already had surgery; theoretically he was in the process of rehabbing from TJS when the A's picked him up (and further along in the same process when they let him go). People were theorizing that he must have had a setback of some kind. Where that leaves him right now... who knows?
by PaulThomas on Jan 2, 2008 9:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see how that gets you a 41st man
He still has to be moved to the 40-man before he can play in the bigs, so where's the gain?
If you're saying that a rich team can protect any guy being optioned down to AAA by making his salary so high that no other team would want to take it on, well, yeah, I think teams can do that right now. But why would anyone do that on purpose? I mean, if we give Dana Eveland a start in Oakland and then want to send him back to Sacramento without having him claimed off waivers, all we have to do is sign him to a Zito-priced contract, and then no one will touch him, right?
As for Jose Garcia, wouldn't he go straight to the 60-day DL? Same as Denorfia last year, so he doesn't take up a roster spot.
Or maybe I'm just not understanding you.
by iglew on Jan 2, 2008 7:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















