Athletics Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Joe Torre: A Man Too Good For The Job

Amidst the relative sanity that is on-the-field baseball – at least when Kenny Lofton isn’t charging the mound from first base – King Georgie rears his petulant head and makes his serf (did I say “serf”? I meant “manager”) an offer to come back. This is a privilege, you understand, because just a week ago His Petulance decreed that if the Yankees didn’t come back to beat the Indians in the ALDS, He probably wouldn’t take Joe Torre back. “Take him back,” mind you, not offer him a new contract. The Yankees did not win the series, yet He – out of the goodness of His (whatever sits where most people keep a heart) – decided to “take Torre back” anyway.

Of course unlike a fly ball to Cust, there was a catch. Torre was only offered a contract with incentives that were “based on how far the Yankees advanced in the playoffs.” Which, of course, Torre can control through his managing. For example, with Jeter up and a runner at first, a poor manager might put on the “strike out” play, while a more savvy manager might put on the “double in a run”. In the 6th inning of a tight game, your more naïve skippers will call for Ron Villone, whereas the wily veteran manager will have the good sense to put in Sandy Koufax.

Yes, it wasn’t enough to humiliate Torre right in the middle of the ALDS by threatening to hold his job hostage to the players’ performances, and it wasn’t bad enough to refer to future negotiations as merely whether or not He would “take Torre back”. King Georgie (whom you may have gathered is not quite “my cup of tea”) had to offer a one year “let’s just see how it goes” contract – to his 12 year veteran manager – with incentives based on the performances of whoever He provided for his serf (there I go again, I really meant to say manager) to oversee.

And then comes the beautiful part: Torre said “No thanks.” Because you can take away someone’s freedom, his possessions, his money, his job, the clothes off his back. But not even George Steinbrenner can take away a man’s dignity just because He wants to. Not this man, not this time. Attaboy, Joe.

0 recs  |  Comment 114 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

It's really absurd to "fire"

a manager who has taken the team to the playoffs 12 consecutive years.  On the other hand, how can someone fail to make the playoffs with the unlimited resources available to the Yankees?  I don't know squat about managing a MBL team.  Yet if you gave me a 200M payroll, I bet I could make a decent showing.  

So long Joe.  We hardly even knew ye.

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on Oct 19, 2007 8:48 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Torre has always struck me as a class act...

...face it, surviving 12 years in the Bronx is a major achievement. Even with all the talent in the world it did take someone special to pacify all of the huge egos on the roster. His players stuck up for him throughout this, it'll be interesting to see how this move affects (will it?) the free agency of Mariano Rivera and Jorge Posada.

Not to mention a third baseman with an out clause in his contract.

by Dr Pez on Oct 19, 2007 8:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You bring up some interesting points.

Suddenly the Yankees appear very vulnerable.  Posada had a great season, but even if they keep him he's getting a little long in the tooth.  Rivera has shown himself to be mortal after all.  The Yankee rotation is average at best.  Giambi has a year left, not that he's a big factor anyway.  Not much offense can be expected from first base next season.  Damon isn't the center fielder they thought they were getting.  

Suddenly A-Rod's negotiating position just got a lot stronger.  There's just not that much free agent talent out there for Steinbrenner to filch.  Could this be the end of empire?  I'd love to see the Yankee's fall hard and fast next year.

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on Oct 19, 2007 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cano is a star

Wang may not be a star, but he is good, cheap, and youngish. It's unlikely that all of Hughes, Kennedy and Joba will turn out into average or better pitchers but they're all very good young pitcher who've already reached the majors, at the very least.

On Sunday, Minaya ticked off a list of candidates to join the rotation, and for once this season, none of them was Jose Lima.

by rfloh on Oct 19, 2007 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Arod doesn't have a negotiation position

Cashman said already that if he opts out of his contract, Yankees wont' pursue him.

by jahs34 on Oct 19, 2007 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And Cashman is

A) Bluffing
B) Telling the truth
C) Hedging

Hmm - must be B because they would never lie.

Or C - they want to work out an extension, so that it's taken care of before the Opt-out becomes active.

by MobiusKlein on Oct 19, 2007 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Big Stein has ceded control

to his little Steins.

This stunt is probably not his doing. He would probably have just straight out told Torre to f*** off.

On Sunday, Minaya ticked off a list of candidates to join the rotation, and for once this season, none of them was Jose Lima.

by rfloh on Oct 19, 2007 9:13 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

no, he would pull some stupid stunt...

like threatening to fire him if the team didn't win the playoff series...  This move was totally Steinbrenner.  Cashman probably would have just kept his mouth shut and fired him in the offseason.

"The more self-centered and egotistical a guy is, the better ballplayer he's going to be."- Bill "The Spaceman" Lee

by The Pilots Dared Me To Die on Oct 19, 2007 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

$$$

I can envision the Yankees going on yet another spending spree this offseason (either resigning their guys, and/or bringing in others). The truth is, though, they have lots of holes to fill and would be best served by attemtping a rebuilding process.

The NY media would never stand for that - so they will spend lots of money on free agents and see what happens.  The whole notion of them picking Abreu's $16M option up - which seems like a foregone conclusion - is just befuddling to me.

When the pressure is on to win big every year you do strange sh*t like that.

by Dr Pez on Oct 19, 2007 9:18 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

As befuddling as signing Mike Piazza for $6M?

Also, Cano (already a star, and only 23), Wang, Cabrera, Joba, Hughes, Kennedy are not an attempt at a rebuilding process?

On Sunday, Minaya ticked off a list of candidates to join the rotation, and for once this season, none of them was Jose Lima.

by rfloh on Oct 19, 2007 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cano is 24
On Sunday, Minaya ticked off a list of candidates to join the rotation, and for once this season, none of them was Jose Lima.

by rfloh on Oct 19, 2007 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thing is,

Cabrera, Joba, Hughes, and Kennedy are pitching for the Yankee's as a matter of necessity, not design.  They're good pitchers so far, but are they enough to keep the Yankee's in contention next season?

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on Oct 19, 2007 9:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Design, necessity

What matters are results.

All 3 are considered top pitching prospects. How many teams can claim to have 3 top pitching prospects on the cusp of being ready to start?

On Sunday, Minaya ticked off a list of candidates to join the rotation, and for once this season, none of them was Jose Lima.

by rfloh on Oct 19, 2007 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course you're correct.

Results are all that matters.  Any guesses on how they will fare in 08?  By the way, you're seriously dampening my heart felt longing for a Yankee collapse.

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on Oct 19, 2007 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heh, I want the Yanks to crash and burn too,

in an orgy of infighting between the little Steins.

Unfortunately, I don't really see it happening. They do have something of a young core to build around already in Cano and Wang. Cano makes me really, really jealous  of them. Cabrera looks like he will be a cheap, decent player. Depending on how Joba, Hughes, Kennedy turn out, that's a young core that can make many perpetually rebuilding teams envious.

I've no idea how they'll fare in 2008; obviously it depends a lot on not just ARod, but also Jeter: is the Jeter of this year the Jeter going forward? If he is, that will be a problem. OTOH, this year might just be an off year due to injury, which is what Yankee fans are saying.

They actually will be a pretty interesting to follow in 2008, with the 3 young pitchers: Hughes, Kennedy, Joba, breaking in.

On Sunday, Minaya ticked off a list of candidates to join the rotation, and for once this season, none of them was Jose Lima.

by rfloh on Oct 19, 2007 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, at least for a change

the Yankee's will be going into the next season with a series of question marks instead of all stars at every single position.  I can't see the Yankee's actually letting A-Rod get away.  They are going to pay and pay dearly.  I also don't think Posada can replicate his numbers of this season.  For a change the Yankee's seem to have a couple of albatross contracts to boot.  

There's enough questions to give an honest Yankee hater hope for next season.

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on Oct 19, 2007 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As a Yankee hater, I like all the ???s

but I also feel they are rebuilding (really promising young pitching) and contending at the same time - which is always Beane's goal, and the mark of a successful organization. I fear they will still contend the next two years, but hope the ???s will win out over the "promising young talent".

Time will tell, as will the progress or lack thereof of a Blue Jays team that could quickly become a 90+ win team or could continue to languish in "near-contention". Go Jays!

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 19, 2007 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And that strange stuff effects MLB too

When the Yankees pay 16M for Abreu, it inflates the whole market for talent.  

And this is not meant as a complaint about Arod making big bucks - Arod helps to keep YES ratings high, which makes money for Steinbrenner.  

by MobiusKlein on Oct 19, 2007 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great post

After I stopped laughing at the Cust line, I was able to focus my attention and I would love to shake Torre's hand. The offer made to Torre was likely made knowing that Torre would reject it and therefore management could save some face. But the whole thing is just so transparent and a Chicken-sh#* way to end an era.

That being said, I hope the Yankees suck next year.

by WannaBeGM on Oct 19, 2007 9:21 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

So was the "Tejada way" better?

Steve Schott would not make Tejada an offer, saying, "I don't want to insult the guy.  We cannot make an offer worthy of Miguel."

Yet fans kept screaming, "OFFER SOMETHING! ANYTHING!!" and felt Schott's no-bid was unforgivable.

So, which was better?  Torre's low bid and "insult", or Tejada's no bit and fond farewell??

"I never predict anything, and I never will." Paul Gascoigne, English footballer

by One won lost won on Oct 20, 2007 10:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Score another against Conventional Wisdom

Torre has not produced and what is Steinbrenner to do?  At least he offered him a contract.  Not a slap in the face, but one that would still make him the highest paid in Baseball, I believe.  Torre should be replaced by Joe Girardi. The Yankee players have no more heart.   Unquantifiable, yes, but clearly not evident in this team of sophisticated Richistanis.  The WS winner will win on emotion and team play.  That much is assured.  The mighty have fallen due to their own weight and burden.  I don't feel sorry for Joe.  He really left the Yankees no alternative.

"We're Menudo," -BB

by eshock on Oct 19, 2007 9:34 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Rebuild
I think the Yanks are going to go on a 2 year rebuilding process.  They will still compete in the AL East, which only has Boston and Toronto (kinda) as competitive teams.  However, Abreau for 16 million seems absurd given his decline in production.  I thought the moves Cashman made this year trading Sheffield and Johnson for prospects was the only good moves he has made in 4-5 years.  Igawa was supposed to be a back of the rotation starter and while his signing looks like a mistake, Igawa has a place in the MLB (either as a 5th starter or bullpen).  Losing A-rod is going to kill them, but the new Yankees should keep stacking their chips (prospects), and make a leap at the Free Agency market once they his the new Yankee stadium in 2009.  The amazing thing is how much payroll they can clear in such a short time, while gaining prospects for the Veterans who leave for free agency.  

by SwisherFan33 on Oct 19, 2007 10:29 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Nico, great post...

...Joe Torre, while paid well, earned every penny of it. Dealing with the NY press on a daily basis and doing it successfully has value - ask Reggie Jackson. Just dealing with George for 12 years carries a very high tariff, too - perhaps La Russa will find it easier to deal with his kids, but I doubt it. People like George Steinbrenner say they will cede control, but they often don't. Add to this Torre's skill and class and he was paid properly and performed well.

This brings me to an A's issue that has been bothering me. Seems that some coaches were fired - one had over 20 years service and was let go with a 2 minute phone call. If this is true, it tells me more than I want to know about A's management, which up to this season I have admired - and I'm not talking about Geren. For men, as employers, to treat other men, as employees as George and Billy Beane seem to be treating their 'underlings' is sad and insensitive - and I'm trying to be kind here.

by doubleplayer on Oct 19, 2007 11:36 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

This has been discussed elsewhere

I don't understand the thing about the 2-minute phone call. Like, who the hell cares? You've just been fired! Isn't that 23740650934875 times more important than how you're fired?

You tell me I'm fired, I'm going to be frustrated, angry and disappointed no matter how you say it. Any "sympathy" is essentially a sham anyway, since if they were really sympathetic to my position I wouldn't be getting canned in the first place.

For what it's worth, Geren did say publicly that he wasn't replacing them because of job performance issues-- which IS relevant, inasmuch as it makes it easier for them to find work elsewhere.

by PaulThomas on Oct 19, 2007 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But but but

why else are you fired if not for "job performance" issues?  

"The worst day on a ball field is better than the best day in any office." - David Wright

by kkdaz on Oct 19, 2007 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

cronyism and nepotism, duh!
"The more self-centered and egotistical a guy is, the better ballplayer he's going to be."- Bill "The Spaceman" Lee

by The Pilots Dared Me To Die on Oct 19, 2007 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess

I mean, would you call it cronyism for the President to replace the previous President's cabinet officers?

It's essentially the same thing.

by PaulThomas on Oct 19, 2007 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

uh, no.

It's how you replace them that makes cronyism.

Hiring people for their their connection to you by blood (nepotism) or long standing friendship (cronyism) instead of their competence is the difference.

Geren's hiring had a whiff of cronyism, since he was chummy with Beane before getting the job.  (you can judge yourself the truth of it.)

by MobiusKlein on Oct 19, 2007 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree..

...When you have employed a person for over 20 years and terminate him or her with a 2 minute phone call, you show everyone else, i.e., your fans, your players, future players and new employees that loyalty is a 1-way street. It's much more than bad PR, it's a sign to everyone that these are people who will cut you loose in a heartbeat. Now, I know that's the way the country is moving and I encourage my children and grandchildren to acquire as many skills as they can and to remember that that 'lack of loyalty' knife cuts both ways. Always, but always, look over your shoulder for a better position. To cut a 20+ employee loose as the A's did simply stinks.

by doubleplayer on Oct 21, 2007 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're right Doubleplayer.

And basic human kindness is important. Yes, calling someone who has worked for the organization for over 20 years and telling them they're out is just cruel.
Yes no matter how they did it ...he'd still be fired but at least he would have had a decent explanation, a hand shake and a kind word. These things do mean a lot to people. When you get older and have had more life experiences You may  understand better. (talking to  Paul Thomas).

by IM4Oakgal on Oct 21, 2007 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I doubt it

since in my admittedly small sample of experiences with being let go, it's always been over the phone.

I'm sure they'd have done it differently if they had thought it would make any difference. But the A's-- like pretty much all corporations these days-- have figured out that making nice with people who are being let go is a complete waste of time, because it won't improve the situation a bit.

"Loyalty" is a garbage concept, and always has been. It's part of this middle-class fantasy that the right wing has created nowadays, about how in the good old days workers and bosses got along great, stuck together for the benefit of the company and never stabbed each other in the back. It's complete nonsense. Workers have been getting shafted for centuries. The use of email and cell phones to fire people has changed none of the central issues.

As far as I'm concerned, "kindness" has absolutely no place in work relations. All it does is obscure the central issues at hand. I don't want to be friends with my boss, because I recognize that in most senses, we're enemies.

by PaulThomas on Oct 21, 2007 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kindness has a place

In all aspects of life. Even the largest corporation has interpersonal relationships between the Supervisors and the workers. I am surprised at your response and can only believe that your work experience had been limited or very bitter . Sorry for that.

by IM4Oakgal on Oct 21, 2007 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not at all

I actually rather like my current job.

But I don't make the mistake of generalizing my current experience to assume that most people are respected, well treated or properly compensated at most jobs. I know waaaay too much about labor history to make that mistake.

by PaulThomas on Oct 22, 2007 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I also don't think

that we can compare sports and entertainment to normal life.

if I get fired over the phone after twenty years of service, no one (except maybe my co-workers and family) aren't going to care one way or the other, and surely no one is going to write about it.

"Hitting is better than sex." Reggie Jackson

by 67MARQUEZ on Oct 21, 2007 7:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1, doubleplayer

Employees who see that their loyalty isn't valued rarely show it back.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 21, 2007 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, give me a break

What's the "value" of being fired in person? $100? $50? Ten cents?

Whatever it is, I know I'd take the money.

by PaulThomas on Oct 21, 2007 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

To argue the other side of the coin...

we as fans have griped constantly about the injuries that seem to plague the team.  We have all but demanded someones head on a platter.  The A's front office is probably much more aware of any sources of friction within the coaching ranks.  Who's to say that these terminations weren't related to philosophical differences embraced by the front office?  I'm not one to be overjoyed at the idea of people loosing their jobs, especially people who have been with the company for a very long time.  But face it, if the company decides to take a new approach and you refuse to wholeheartedly support the new direction, you have no one to blame but yourself if they decide to leave you behind.  

I doubt that we as fans will ever know the true reasons these guys were cut loose.  But I also doubt that it was all that great a shock to the folks that were dumped.  One thing we do know for sure is that next season Geren will have his own people in place.  Everyone will be on the same page as the GM, the manager, and the organization as a whole.  From a fans point of perspective, this has to be viewed as a good thing for the Oakland A's.  

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on Oct 21, 2007 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree, alox, especially with regard to Lach

The treatment of Fischer (as I see it from my 3rd deck view) seems less understandable.

<sits on tarp>

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 21, 2007 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have no clue..

If firing those guys will make a difference or not.I have no problem with the management deciding to try something different. That's a job for the insiders to decide. But my criticism is in the way the guys were told that they were terminated.

by IM4Oakgal on Oct 21, 2007 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your criticism is justified

because you are a sweet and kind person who would probably have a difficult time introducing misfortune into anyone's life.  

Unfortunately, sometimes people make poor choices that force someone else to act as an executioner.  I can't really think of a kind way to ax someone, so it's really irrelevant how it's done.  Really, the only kind way to do it is to make it clean and quick.

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on Oct 22, 2007 8:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

TY Alox

But I am a pretty tough old nut. I believe in kindness but in my job I have to be tough often. In fact, Friday I am going to be testifying against a student...and that testimony will put him away for quite a few years. But sometimes you have to do difficult things. Telling someone that they are terminated isn't something that has to be done in a cruel way. I have many friends who went through corporate down-sizing. Nobody was told in a two minute phone call. Most were prepared for it...and it made it easier.

by IM4Oakgal on Oct 22, 2007 5:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That kid who was caught jaywalking?

Man, IM4Oakgal, you ARE a tough old nut.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 22, 2007 7:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL Nico

I am pretty down but you do have a way of putting a smile on my face.
This school year has been really tough...one of my girls went back to prostitution...one girl told me that her Mom had locked her out and wouldn't answer her calls...which alarmed me because I knew her Mother was depressed and yes, sure enough she had committed suicide. The gang situation is a raging and now this. I have to testify against a kid I really like because he beat a boy who I detest. See why you don't want to work in the public school system?

by IM4Oakgal on Oct 22, 2007 9:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yup - our big scandals are usually,

"Joe's spreading rumors that Violet likes Mickey, and IT'S NOT TRUE!!!!!"

Not really, but close. There is some prostitution, but that's just the teachers.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 23, 2007 8:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh we have those too

and even really little stuff. One day I interviewed an entire Special Ed. class. Grilled 'em  over and over. Why? The teacher wanted me to find the culprit that had been drawing a penis on her SSR books.

by IM4Oakgal on Oct 23, 2007 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Once again:

"The penis mightier than the sword."

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 23, 2007 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Corny Boy!
Yeah I meant to write  C.

by IM4Oakgal on Oct 23, 2007 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have to...

...disagree again. My remarks were directed specifically at the termination of a 20+ year employee. This man was good enough for the organization (Mr. Beane) for a good portion of those 20 years. HE should have been the one to sit down with Fisher (sp?) and give him the specific reasons for the firing. The man deserves it. No, it's not pleasant for either man, but it might help both of them, i.e., the one terminated just might have some flaws that he could correct when he works for another team and Mr. Beane, who up to now I have admired as a GM, might learn something about himself that needs changing. Sanctioning a culture that tosses people out on their ear, regardless of their tenure, is counterproductive - always.

by doubleplayer on Oct 23, 2007 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Again, he was not fired "for cause"

So what flaws is he going to correct? "Well, we think you should become better friends with the bench coach next time."

by PaulThomas on Oct 23, 2007 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Semantics, PaulT...

...The man was terminated/let go/cut loose - however you want to put it.
The man worked over 20 years for the same organization. Now, I know this is done every day by many corporations. That doesn't mean employers are justified in terminating someone in any way they wish. This is not a legal question. It's a moral one. I really did expect more from Mr. Beane than this...classless act regardless of the reason.  

by doubleplayer on Oct 23, 2007 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not arguing semantics

I'm saying, the publicly stated position of the Oakland A's is that the three fired coaches were not released due to poor job performance. If this is in fact the case, and certainly we have no reason to believe it isn't, then it would be pointless (and borderline insulting) for Beane to try to tell him how to do a job he's already doing well enough.

by PaulThomas on Oct 23, 2007 6:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think doubleplayer's point -

certainly mine - is that saying "28 year veteran of the organization? No one's ever had a problem with you? Sorry, but we're going in a different direction," is the kind of move often made in heartless corporations (where employees may as well be numbers), is the kind of move that inspires no loyalty whatsoever from the employees who remain, and is classless. Regardless of how it's done, it sends a very troubling message that "bringin' in my own guys," at the expense of lifers who have never had a bad word said about them, is ok.

The point is, the fact that Fischer's performance had nothing to do with it is the troubling part. This is NOT like the training/conditioning/medical staff, where questions about competency and/or player trust have swirled for years. And THAT'S why it's so disconcerting to see a Brad Fischer discarded with a shrug.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 23, 2007 6:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This must be a generational gap or something

because I just find it incomprehensible that anyone in this day and age would believe that corporations are after anything other than their own bottom line. It strikes me as bizarrely naive.

Want a cause? Lobby for all the auto workers who've been kicked to the curb because they've been replaced with machines and never been retrained to do anything else. Or the skilled shipbuilders who've been replaced by cheap contract laborers. The Wal-Mart workers cut loose for trying to form a union-- or prescreened out before even being hired for having leftist tendencies. I could go on forever.

Being a worker in the United States sucks. I'm sorry, but I'm just unable to muster massive sympathy for this one particular guy who happened to get fired from a particularly cushy position. It's a non-story to me. Just another brick in the wall.

by PaulThomas on Oct 24, 2007 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

torre as the A's new bench coach please! :)

as much as i dislike the yankees, i've always respected joe torre as their manager. he seemed like a classy guy and he, along with jeter, were the faces of that franchise.

he will have no problem finding a job if he chooses to continue managing.

by gotgreen on Oct 19, 2007 12:52 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

It'd be a nice little F-you to Steinbrenner

Take a very weak paying lower job from a smaller market team instead of the millions he's offering.

In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!

by DMOAS on Oct 19, 2007 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

why are we talking about the Yankees?

(haha)

Great post, Nico.

Man, so many thoughts on this. I have always admired Torre for his work, under some pretty weighty expectations and often impossible circumstances.

I don't think just because a manager is given a 200 million payroll, he should expected to win. And who's to say those players combined are even worth that much? Regardless, there are some managers (like there are players) who wilt under that kind of pressure and expectations. Torre did not.

The Yankees of 1996-2001 had Jeter, Rivera, Williams, Posada and Pettite in their primes (and btw, all those guys came up through the farm system, belying the assumption that the Yankees buy all their talent). But something else the Yankees had during that time: a knack for picking up a Paul O'Neill or a Scott Brosius, those key fill in guys who are essential for going from great to special. At some point the well ran dry and George figured he could just buy his way back to the top. You can buy talent, but you can't buy intangibles.

Speaking of George, we should not be surprised by anything he does. Except for the fact that a manager actually lasted tweleve years on the payroll. His latest act of giving a publicized ultimatum fazed me none whatsoever, classless as it may have been. Give him credit for wanting to win at all costs, but that's all far as it goes.

I better stop before I start sounding like a Yankee fan.

"Hitting is better than sex." Reggie Jackson

by 67MARQUEZ on Oct 19, 2007 12:57 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

as far as Lofton's "charging the mound"

(which didn't seem to be much of a charge compared with Swish's charge), apparently there's some history of animosity between

Lofton and Beckett"

The Indians hitter has been flipping his bat for years when he draws a walk. He did it on a 3-0 pitch from Beckett in the bottom of the fifth, apparently thinking he'd taken ball four.

Not so fast, plate umpire Gary Cederstrom said, calling a strike.

Lofton hit a fly ball to left on the 3-1 pitch, and Beckett began screaming at him as soon as the ball left his bat. Beckett continued screaming as Lofton ran to first, and the hitter began to head toward the mound after he was called out.

"He doesn't like it when I take my bat and flip it on a walk," Lofton said. "He's the only pitcher who's had a problem with it. He was saying stuff I didn't like and I said something back. That's who he is. He's that kind of guy."

Several Red Sox infielders immediately moved in to keep the two apart, and players on both benches and in the bullpens soon joined them.

Beckett and Lofton got into a similar argument during a game in 2005. Lofton, then with the Phillies, dropped his bat at home plate after Beckett walked him. He stopped halfway up the baseline after an agitated Beckett, pitching for the Marlins, appeared to say something in his direction. Both benches cleared, but no punches were thrown and no one was ejected.

"It was a lot of stuff," Beckett said. "It kind of goes back before today. Those things have a way of working themselves out, though."

by OaklandSi on Oct 19, 2007 1:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

What the hell is Beckett's deal?
Seriously, that was like the most innocuous thing ever. I thought at the time that Lofton had just fumbled his bat.

The contrast in sportsmanship is really pretty evident here: Lofton flips a bat like two inches on what he thought was a walk and gets verbally assaulted for it. Meanwhile Beckett throws at Franklin Gutierrez's head for daring to throw out Manny at the plate, and Ramirez... well, let's just say his play in this series has given a whole new meaning to the term "showboating."

The Red Sox should be embarrassed by this kind of chickenshit behavior from their hypothetical two best players.

by PaulThomas on Oct 19, 2007 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did I miss something?

Did Manny moonwalk around the bases?
Did he stop at second, pull out a camera, and take a photo of himself?

Did he sign his name in urine on the infield dirt?

That would be embarrassing chickenshit.

by MobiusKlein on Oct 19, 2007 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd say a 380' single off the top of the fence

which scores David Ortiz from first base qualifies as "moonwalking," but maybe I'm just not familiar with the term.

by PaulThomas on Oct 19, 2007 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i would pay good money

to see an ortiz/stairs/dmitri 400 meter competition

by notah8er on Oct 19, 2007 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Leave the goddamn helmet on Manny!

Why does he feel so compelled to show off his doo rag whenever there's a break in the action?  That's chickenshit enough for me.

by Brian in 317 on Oct 19, 2007 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What I really would like to see...

is an A's hitter go deep on Lackey.  When he rounds third I'd like him to take off his batting helmet, face the mound, and then do a little Planters peanut side step chorus line dance all the way to the plate.  Then he can take a bow towards the Angels dugout.  That's what I'd really like to see.  

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on Oct 19, 2007 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

what I'd like to see...

Sometime when Lackey throws an inside pitch, I'd like to see Swisher calmly drop his bat, walk slowly towards the mound with a smile on his face, stopping about three feet from the rubber, whipping out his skip and pissing on Lackey's shoe...

"The more self-centered and egotistical a guy is, the better ballplayer he's going to be."- Bill "The Spaceman" Lee

by The Pilots Dared Me To Die on Oct 19, 2007 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL at the mental image

Nicely done!

"Female ass are strange creatures. They come and go as they please." -- Sigourney Weaver

by oblique on Oct 19, 2007 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Today's NYTimes article

Go to: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/19/sp...
to read "In Torre’s Parting, Echoes of Stengel’s"

Here is one excerpt that made me laugh

 Were you fired? he [Stengel] was asked.

 "Write anything you want," he said. "Quit, fired, whatever  
  you please. I don’t care."

The writers loved Stengel. He always provided a story, making their jobs easier.

by NoeValley on Oct 19, 2007 3:32 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

piniella had a worse season

the cubs had no excuse not to win 90.  they have half of the best young starters in baseball and the best all-around batter (ramirez) in baseball, alongside a truly terrifying power threat in soriano and an awesome hitter for average in lee (though his immaturity is a liability, no offense big guy...).

but because these things solely exist relative to expectations, it doesn't mean anything, and lou is thought of as the hero who brought them back to glory while torre is seen as a washed-up guy who isn't fit for playoff strategy.  this despite the fact that in at least one respect (basic pitcher and lineup calls) torre is far superior.

you can't expect everyone to understand the curse of a-rod.  

on a similar note, i really missed howe this year.  he was a great manager.

by notah8er on Oct 19, 2007 4:14 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Perhaps in a parallel universe,

where Aramis Ramirez is the best all-around batter in baseball, I'd agree with you.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 19, 2007 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he must have somehow confused Aramis

with Hanley. (Although you could make a plausible argument that Hanley isn't even the best hitter on his own team, let alone in baseball.)

by PaulThomas on Oct 20, 2007 12:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Considering that Manny Ramirez

is a better hitter than Aramis is, you could make the argument that Aramis Ramirez is only the 3rd best hitter named Ramirez. Whereas Albert is clearly the best hitter named Pujols.

If you're going to declare someone the best hitter in baseball, he needs to clearly be better than only the 3rd best hitter with his own last name.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 20, 2007 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would like two things:

1-- for Torre to have left last week -- completely on his own terms -- knowing that something like this was coming, and

2-- for the Wankees to have no off-season issues, leaving the Eastern Sports Partisans Network with nothing to talk about.  

The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus

by The Dogfather on Oct 19, 2007 5:10 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Joe was no Dick Williams

Tired of Charlie Finley's antics, Williams left on his terms, but only after he managed the A's to a second straight World Series.

"Hitting is better than sex." Reggie Jackson

by 67MARQUEZ on Oct 19, 2007 5:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Then again George may be many things...

but he's no Finely.

In fact, Steinbrenner's first hire was Williams for the '74 season. Only Finley protested, saying that Williams owed him a year. Steinbrenner hired Bill Virdon (who in turn begat Billy Martin).

Then when Williams got hired by the Angels (whom he led to consecutive last place finishes), his first series was a 4-gamer at Oakland. The A's swept with Finely flashing "Good Night Dick" on the scoreboard after each win.

Classy.

"Hitting is better than sex." Reggie Jackson

by 67MARQUEZ on Oct 19, 2007 5:41 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Finley...

I can't believe that guy was allowed to buy a baseball team. Man, was that ever a different era.

Of course, without him (or at least, without players who hated him), there might be no free agency today.

by PaulThomas on Oct 20, 2007 12:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Charlie Finley and Bill Veeck

were the best things to happen to MLB.  They really should let Cuban buy into the Cubs.  MLB needs a renaissance man more than they have ever before.

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on Oct 20, 2007 12:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

MLB did a character evaluation

on Charley Finley in the early 1960's, with the Baltimore Orioles owner leading the "investigation".

I love that guy's opinion of Finley:

"Under no circumstances should this man be allowed to own a club in our league."

Three years later, Finley snuck by...got the A's in Kansas City (I forget why/how he got by the "guards" (other owners).

"I never predict anything, and I never will." Paul Gascoigne, English footballer

by One won lost won on Oct 20, 2007 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I rode in an elevator with Joe Torre

in 1976, when I was a 14 year old kid staying in the same hotel with the Cardinals (the Hilton in Pittsburgh).  That man has one of the largest noggins I've ever seen (non-steroid aided, anyway).  I got his autograph, but have long since lost it.  I always liked him 'til he became Yankees skipper; now I guess I can like him again.

by Brian in 317 on Oct 19, 2007 8:27 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Hire Macha

Kin George should hire Ken Macha.

by AlBowe on Oct 19, 2007 9:53 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree

But the problems with Pittsburgh are at the top of that organization, with owners seemingly unwilling to strive to field a winning team.  I don't think any manager would look at Pittsburgh as a dream job, though if anyone would it would be local boy Macha.  

by Brian in 317 on Oct 20, 2007 8:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes i think he would too.

and I want to see Macha do well. He did get a raw deal here IMO.

by IM4Oakgal on Oct 20, 2007 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry

But I disagree.

You can call it what you will--and I know BB feels that playoff series, especially five-game playoff series, are as much about luck as anything--but the Steinbrenners have every right to hold Torre responsible.

Listen, I get tired of Steinbrenner and he's not my favoritest person in the world, but if you gave me an owner who spent that much to improve our team, I'd snatch him up in a hot minute.  In 2006, for example, he spent 74 million dollars more than the second place team did.  That was more than 16 clubs (including our A's) spent on their entire payroll.

Granted, it may not be fair to lay all this at Torre's feet.  But he's had diminishing returns for his investment in Torre.  They've lost their opening round series three years in a row.  Yes, luck is involved.  But when your payroll is $128 million more (vs. the Indians in '07), $112 million more (vs. the Tigers in '06), and $101 million more (vs. the Angels in '05), I think you have a right to expect to be more competitive.

I think the most interesting aspect of the contract they offered Torre, and something I've not seen covered, is the fact that the incentives were not for him to win the World Series, just to make the World Series.  Whatever happened in the WS, Torre would get the same amount.  And quite frankly, when you're spending that much more than your competition, I'm not exactly sure that's an unreasonable expectation.

Able was I ere I saw Elba.

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 20, 2007 7:59 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You'd be more convincing if ...

... you cited specific examples of his managerial blunders that led to the premature eliminations.  WADR, your post is long on conclusion and short on evidence.  

The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus

by The Dogfather on Oct 20, 2007 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point

The players play the game, not the manager.

"Fremont is basically a parking lot with a mayor"

by BruceBochte on Oct 20, 2007 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not exactly sure

I need specific examples of managerial blunders, DF.

What is your argument for him being retained?  I mean, if we give him credit for the Yankees making it to the playoffs for 12 years in a row, is it not illogical to then not hold him accountable for continuing to win in the postseason?

Here's the bottom line for me.  The disparity in money spent between the Yankees and the rest of the league is so great that you or I or Corky from "Thirtysomething" could "manage" this club to 90 wins.  I fail to see the greatness that is Joe Torre, so I fail to see the great tragedy that his not accepting a new contract represents.

Here's a guy that has the highest payroll in the league by a lot.  If he has a need, it is immediately addressed.  There's no shortage of money, no shortage of talent, and no shortage of fan support.  Sure, he's got the headaches of an overly aggressive media and an overzealous owner, but those were known factors (and in the case of the media, previously experienced factors) prior to taking the job.  And he was offered a contract.

Able was I ere I saw Elba.

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 20, 2007 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

oh

and here's Torre's answer for you, DF:

Torre said during his news conference that there was only one thing he'd change about his tenure.

"If I had something to do over again, it's something weird, but it would probably be in Game 2 this year in the division series," he said. "I wish I had gone out the damn mound and had the bugs all over me, where I could have maybe talked the umpires into [stopping] play here for a little bit.

"I sent my trainer out. I got about halfway out, for some reason I'm thinking about trips to the mound, I don't want to get charged. And I figured my trainer could take care of it, not that he didn't take care of it, but you know in retrospect and going back, I wish I'd have been a little more proactive in that area."

Clearly a managerial blunder.

Able was I ere I saw Elba.

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 20, 2007 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess I hit and ran.

BUT, having said that,

1--I don't need an argument that he be retained, LB -- the burden of defending your post is yours.  The fact that I called you on it does not make me an apologist for the opposite conclusion.  

But, having said THAT:

2--I have always laid the "blame" for the Wankers' "failures" at the feet of the GM -- esp. since he over-invested in offense and chronically under-staffed their mound.  Pitching beats hitting, againx3.

AND, having said THAT!

3--Billy's right -- the nature of The Game is that the Play-Offs ARE a crapshoot.  The best teams are the ones with the best records over 162 games, when streaks, luck, bad breaks etc. tend to even out. They could do better with the scheduling to promote that conclusion, but that's a rant for another day.   The World Series is a great tournament, but it's not the same as saying that its winner is the best team.  

So, I really don't think the Manager's all that outcome-determining, esp. in the Tournament.  What I dislike is Steinbrenner's humiliation of Torre, on n interpersonal level.  He acts like it IS his credit or blame, which it's not, and then treats a class-act like shyt.  

Plus, that farking Steinbrenner paid Drew Henson $17 million to leave A2 early, the Buckeye bastard.  

The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus

by The Dogfather on Oct 21, 2007 9:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And apropos of #3 above,

... the fact that the Wanks' won four times in twelve tries in an annual eight-team tournament puts them ahead of the odds.  It's a whole crappile of money to invest in roughly tripling your chances (from .125 to .333), but they HAVE beaten those odds, strictly speaking.

They're just disappointed because their early success at the table lent them a false sense of entitlement.  

The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus

by The Dogfather on Oct 21, 2007 9:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

how about we hold the players making that money

accountable?

"Hitting is better than sex." Reggie Jackson

by 67MARQUEZ on Oct 20, 2007 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes, but

the manager takes the praise when they win and the blame when they lose.  That's the deal.  That's the way it is in sports.

And the man was not fired.  He was offered a new contract, at a reduced base salary, with incentive clauses that would have paid more than he was this year should he win a playoff series.  It represented a major increase should he make it to the world series.

Able was I ere I saw Elba.

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 20, 2007 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i agree with some of the things

you're saying. Especially these days, we're quick to crown the next genius, be it manager, coach, or GM.

I just don't agree with the public ultimatum in the middle of a series. I also don't completly buy into the whole "he was given a Ferrari, but drove it like a Volvo" theory. I say some of those guys are overpriced and over the hill.

Even going off the assumption that he had talent worthy of 90+ wins, some managers aren't up for the pressure of those expectations, on a year to year basis, working for a guy like George. Torre was and he should be credited for that.

"Hitting is better than sex." Reggie Jackson

by 67MARQUEZ on Oct 20, 2007 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The public ultimatum

was no good, I agree.  But even Torre in his news conference yesterday admitted the circumstances surrounding that were very suspect.

Torre did do a good job in handling the pressure, both from his boss and from the media.  He handled the clubhouse very well too, it would appear.  So he's more qualified than Macha.

Look, at the end of the day, Torre went to 12 straight postseasons.  He won four World Series.  But he also accomplished those things while the Yankees were spending considerably more money than the rest of us.  And I can guarantee you they won't mention that in his obit.  

I resent the hell out of the Yankees and what they represent, and I'm not about to call their manager a genius.  And I'm not about to call it a travesty that their manager didn't get offered a bigger contract.  Screw those guys.  I mean, seriously.

Able was I ere I saw Elba.

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 20, 2007 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My answer, Leopold Bloom,

would be that Torre consistently did everything a manager can do to help his team succeed. He kept the clubhouse in control despite the presence of highly paid stars / prima donnas (e.g., Jeter - ARod friction), and scandal (e.g., Giambi), his players respected him and backed him publicly, and he was a very good "in game tactician" - basically all the qualities you want in a manager. And the result was leading a flawed team to the post-season, where lately their flaws were exposed and exploited.

So what exactly DIDN'T he do well? The only answer I've heard from anyone, including his bosses, is "sit in the dugout and make his team win in a best of 5 series."

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 20, 2007 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

for all their bloated payroll

the Yankees have not had that strong a rotation or middle relief corps for the last few years. Their strong offense has made up for it during the season -- but that's the kind of thing that makes it difficult to advance during the postseason.

Torre is not responsible for which pitchers the Yankees hired or traded away.

by OaklandSi on Oct 20, 2007 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kind of like I said in the original post -

Torre went to Ron Villone when Sandy Koufax would have been a better choice. Too bad for Torre that he only had Villone. This particular series was lost because his 19-game winner - and a guy every manager would have thrown - pitched like garbage twice, while his most reliable hitter bounced into double-plays like they were going out of style and his vunderkind reliever got really bugged.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 20, 2007 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, but,

It's not simply a matter of not winning a five game series.  It's been three years since they've made it out of the first round of the playoffs, four since they've made it to the World Series and seven since they've won one.  

That seems to me to be a trend, and all the players manager, good guy qualities in the world don't seem to be able to deny it.

If I'm regularly spending two or three or even four times more than the competition, and I'm getting worse results than the competition, eventually I'm going to start looking around, asking why.  

Now the reality may be that Torre did absolutely nothing wrong, did a lot of things right, and may be being held accountable here in an unfair manner (as suggested by 67Marquez).  But...again, that's the deal.  He's the manager.  He gets the glory when they win and the blame when they lose.  Are either fair or right or logical?  Probably not.  But it's how we do in American sports.  Was Belichick the genius he is today in Cleveland?  Ask any Browns fan.  Was Pete Carroll a mastermind in Boston?  Ask a Pats fan.  Are either perception currently represented about either man accurate?  Probably not.  But it's how we do.

And again, I must protest.  We're talking about a man whose contract was up.  He was offered a new contract and turned it down.  They obviously thought he was doing something right or they would not have offered him the contract.

But we may be in a situation (as I strongly suspect) where I am in the vast minority here and we will have to agree to disagree.

Able was I ere I saw Elba.

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 20, 2007 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He should have batted A-Rod leadoff

He could have done many things to shake up his team, really get them reinvigorated.  If they didn't work, at least he showed he was willing to pull all the stops.

He should have met with Steinbrenner prior to the post-season.  "No pronouncements mid-series.  No grandstanding."  

The Post-season is all messed up in baseball.  Statistically, the rate at which wild-card teams make it to the World Series shows that it is a flawed system IMHO.

"I never predict anything, and I never will." Paul Gascoigne, English footballer

by One won lost won on Oct 20, 2007 10:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Torre

I think the point that people are missing here is this: There's no way any manager could have earned the salary that Torre was earning prior to this year. It's just not a feasible concept. It's possible that the Yankees (read: Steinbrenner's sons) finally figured out that Dad was essentially pouring money down a hole and waiting for diamonds to climb out of it with their managers, and resolved to reduce the manager's salary-- even at the expense of Torre-- before they signed the next managerial contract.

The qualities that Nico speaks about are nice, but Torre isn't twice as good at them as any other manager in baseball.

Quite honestly, I was totally unimpressed with Torre's tactical abilities the last few years. I'm generous enough to say that it's a recent thing-- he seems to have ossified during his time in New York-- but his handling of his pitching staff this year was little short of atrocious and probably contributed to their early slide, as he essentially burnt the bullpen out in April and then saw it beaten to a pulp in May.

I don't know about Mattingly, but if they can hire Girardi for the same or less money than they just offered Torre, I'd make that swap in a New York minute.

by PaulThomas on Oct 21, 2007 12:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with your take

What's wrong with incentives?

With all the money Torre has made as the MLB's highest paid manager, what difference does the dollar figure make in 2008?

After all maybe the PLAYERS might do more for Joe, knowing he has a million dollars on the line if they don't perform.  They all professed their love for him...why don't they "chip in" and make his salary higher?  And will they be able to face Torre if they blow his million bucks with a playoff loss??

67 is pretty old, too.

"I never predict anything, and I never will." Paul Gascoigne, English footballer

by One won lost won on Oct 20, 2007 10:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hire Torre Now!
"This must be heaven," he says.
"No. It's Oakland."

by Kyli on Oct 20, 2007 9:40 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

STEINBRENNER: MOB BOSS?

Man reading the accounts of how this all went down, it made Steinbrenner sound like he models his life on the mafia.  The account of how the thing went down was eerily reminscent of a freaking Godfather movie.  

Wolffish are far from perfect, but they at least act with a bit more humanity...

"Fremont is basically a parking lot with a mayor"

by BruceBochte on Oct 20, 2007 11:38 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Really?

At least Georgie offered the deal to Torre's face. He didn't have someone call him and say Sayonarra over the phone.

by IM4Oakgal on Oct 20, 2007 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

or

send assassins to kill him at his Tahoe home.  Where his children played and his wife slept.

Able was I ere I saw Elba.

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 20, 2007 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

that too. LOL.

by IM4Oakgal on Oct 20, 2007 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Torre's departure probably won't matter

Against my better judgment, I have liked the Yankees more with Torre as manager.  I have no reason not to believe all the plaudits thrown his way, and he certainly added a dose of class on top or an organization that's pretty insufferable even with him there.

But you know what?  Casey Stengel was really popular too, especially with the media, and do you know what the Yankees did with his successor?  They won the next two World Series.

I'm not saying that will happen with the Yankees now.  They are obviously a team in transition, although there seems to plenty of talent that got a taste of the big leagues this year.

But Torre was a basically a retread manager when he got hired.  He never was successful, because he never had the talent.  With the Yankees, he inherited an up-and-coming group of talented players who still form the heart of that team.  And so he became a genius.

A college football or basketball coach is really important, because they control most everything about the program.  Baseball managers take the talent they have and deploy it.  Some do it better than others.  Torre had some unique issues to deal with, i.e. Steinbrenner, and handled them well.  

But managers, in the end, just aren't that important.  Torre will discover that is he tries to manage a team without a $200 million payroll or loads of young talent.

The Yankees may struggle next year, or they may win the World Series.  My guess is that Torre's departure won't have much to do with it, unless his depature means Alex Rodriguez decides to go elsewhere as a result.

by bear88 on Oct 21, 2007 12:37 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Or Posada - I wonder how the Yanks

will fill catcher the position if Posada leaves.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 21, 2007 8:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or as Warren Spahn said about Stengal...

"I'm the only player who played for Stengel before and after he was a genius."

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on Oct 21, 2007 8:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What I'm curious about in all this...

is how long is it before Cashman starts to get the evil eye from George?  He's the guy who put the team together.  I guess it's not as popular with the NY fans to fire the GM.  

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on Oct 21, 2007 8:09 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Here's a Stengelism that could

be applied to one of our very own...

"Amazing strength, amazing power - he (Ron Swoboda) can grind the dust out of the bat. He will be great, super even wonderful. Now, if he can only learn to catch a fly ball."

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on Oct 21, 2007 8:23 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Omigod, that is

soooooooooo Mike Ellis!!!

-Cindi

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 21, 2007 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I remember well how

fly balls were always an adventure with Swoboda in the outfield.

by OaklandSi on Oct 21, 2007 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms
Start posting about the Athletics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Imgp0089_editedagasin_small
DLD 11/24/09 - Fine, I'll make another video game dump
Me_at_att_park_small
Greener Grass, Episode 7: Transportation Proclamation
Me_at_att_park_small
Old McPherson is an A, e yi e yi yoooooooo
Depaulbluedemons_small
Community Prospect List #18
413niegoftl__sl500_aa280__small
A's Protect Carter, FDLS, Figueroa and Souza from Rule V

Recent FanPosts

Small
The A's Move to Oakland in 1968
Funny-pictures12_small
If Jack Cust Traded, Then To Whom And For What?
Small
Jack Cust Drawing Trade Interest?
Countdown_small
Some things I am "coming around" on...
Bill_king_small
On Trading Catchers....

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Tyler_at_maya_school_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

As_kings_cal_small louismg

Editors

Countdown_small Taj Adib

Ziegler160px_small Flashfire

527918550406_0_bg_small notsellingjeans