DLD -- PECOTA knows the A's
Devo's first ever link dump! It's a crappy one!
Jayson Stark votes for McGwire
That National Championship of College Football is tonight. Who do you think will win?
Brilliant sports journalist, Devin Lavelle presents an interesting look at PECOTA's successes and failings in picking 2006's outcome.
For the third year in a row, PECOTA has pegged the A's win total. It did a great job with the AL West, but had a so-so performance in the AL East and completely blew the Central. Okay, you're right, credit where credit's due -- it nailed the Royals suckitude.
It did a much better job with the NL.
The Padres exceeded expectations, thanks, almost entirely to Chris Young and Clay Hensley and the Mets had an easier time with the NL East than expected, but, otherwise it did well here.
Team PECOTA Wins Actual Wins Difference PythWins Difference
NYY 94 97 3 96 -2
Tor 79 87 8 86 -7
Bos 93 86 -7 81 12
Bal 77 70 -7 69 8
Tam 69 61 -8 65 4
Boston's injuries made this one a snoozer. Expect big things from Coco Crisp in 2007. I'm curious to see Toronto's 07 PECOTAs. Did it think their improvement was real or a fluke? It didn't do great work here, but then, comperatively speaking.
Min 84 96 12 93 -9
Det 83 95 12 96 -13
Chi 82 90 8 88 -6
Cle 88 78 -10 89 -1
Kan 61 62 1 61 0
No one saw the Tiggers coming (to that extent), so that can be forgiven and Liriano's quick ascent and huge years from, well, everyone played a big role in the Twinkies overperformance -- after adjusting for Liriano's loss, I expect them to fall off in '07. Cleveland ran into injuries and had some pitching woes, so that's understandable. Pretty much hit the nail on the head with KC. I guess that's a little something KC can hang their hat on, they exceeded someone's expectations. And then there's the White Sox. Kenny Williams is doing some good things these days.
Oak 93 93 0 0 85 8
Los 81 89 8 8 84 -3
Tex 80 80 0 0 86 -6
Sea 77 78 1 1 77 0
Well done. Jered Weaver played a huge role in Anaheim overperforming and Juan Rivera seemed to have stolen Jeter's bat in his breakout season.
NYM 88 97 9 91 -3
Phi 86 85 -1 86 0
Atl 85 79 -6 85 0
Fla 71 78 7 80 -9
WDC 70 71 1 69 1
Essentially the Mets' entire offense had a good year and Jose Reyes broke out. The Braves fell a little harder than expected and Florida had spunk. Good job, overall.
StL 86 83 -3 82 4
Hou 81 82 1 83 -2
Cin 78 80 2 76 2
Mil 84 75 -9 71 13
Pit 79 67 -12 70 9
Chi 85 66 -19 69 16
Okay, predicting a near .500 season for the 'rats is just flat out questionable. Chicago pretty much spent it's season where Jim Hendry spent his offseason, in intensive care. It did a good job predicting the division's mediocrity, even if it took a couple whiffs.
SDO 78 88 10 87 -9
LAD 87 88 1 88 -1
SFO 80 76 -4 76 4
Ari 77 76 -1 80 -3
Col 74 76 2 81 -7
A couple of breakout performances by young pitchers can do a lot in a crappy division. Except for San Diego, PECOTA pegged it.
I'd rate PECOTA's work a C+. It had a bit of a rough year in the Central, but overall put up decent numbers. Dump away!
102 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
two questions
could that possibly be a better way to evaluate it? for example, it can't really be blamed for the indians ending up at -10 when based on their RS and RA, they should be +1 or so.
Slightly better ...
Well, to be fair, there are
Fine ...
The Pythag records are above as well. It closes the average miss from 5.8 to 5.5.
The pyth. wins
Yeah, we got pretty lucky ...
What I meant is
Which means we aren't pursuing Erstad
Comparing predictions
None of the forecasters with longer track records have been able to beat Vegas by a significant amount, though a few (the author's Diamond Mind simulations, Sports Illustrated, and a couple of individual writers) have been about as good.
random observations
so it gets the a's right but the angels are +10, +12, +8 in the last three years: bummer.
the projections were off by a bit less than last year. 05 = 6 games, 06 = 5.77 games. the big problems seem to be the central divisions.
i decided to compare it to my own mediocre 06 predictions: i was off by 6.17 games so at least it beat me (although my AL west was just as good, 9 total games off).
Did you write that Onion article, XB?
"Strength, speed, and agility are just three of the qualities that the players on the team from your area lack. The players representing my area, on the other hand, have these traits in abundance."
-Brutal trash talk.
by notsellingjeans on Jan 7, 2007 11:49 PM PST up reply actions
NL central
it did a good job predicting the NL west's mediocrity. it didn't do such a good job predicting the NL central's crappyness.
I give it a pass on the Cubs ...
Derek Lee's injury also wasn't at all predictable.
Come on, Sal, do it!
Absurd headline
Someone give that editor the sports beat.
by green star oakland on Jan 8, 2007 11:52 AM PST up reply actions
After my last review panel for them
The agency is being destroyed by the removal of any scientific considerations from its policy-making processes, and that is a real shame given its extraordinary past successes (equally extraordinary past failures notwithstanding).
by green star oakland on Jan 8, 2007 12:13 PM PST up reply actions
REPORT: NASA find salb on Mars
At least they weren't looking for
If we launched him into the sun...
No
by BlameChannel53 on Jan 8, 2007 4:01 PM PST up reply actions
I Saw Billy Beane on TV
by SportySpice @ Athletics Nation on Jan 8, 2007 11:15 AM PST reply actions
I've seen the Ford ads
What does Beane make as GM?
by SportySpice @ Athletics Nation on Jan 8, 2007 11:22 AM PST up reply actions
Could be much worse
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Jan 8, 2007 11:25 AM PST up reply actions
<<<gaaaaaack>>>
William Lamaar Cougar Lemoncamp...
Our ghostriding homeboys
I honestly didn't find that video very funny until the fourth time I watched it. Now I think it's hilarious.
That story
I'm not sure
a series of tubes?
Nachotubes...
has this one been posted on here...
Do the jerseys come with pocket protectors?
Last year Sports Illustrated's Rick Reilly wrote a column of appreciation for the Caltech squad (subscription req'd), for their perseverance in the face of futility, as juxtaposed with their serious smarts. Some fun excerpts:
- "We think too much," says Roy Dow, the Beavers' coach.
- The team's best player, senior Jordan Carlson, who's a theoretical physics major, figures he does schoolwork 14 hours a day. What's so important at school? "Well," he says, "an interesting question we're studying now is how mass is generated in terms of quantum field theory." Oh, sure, the Kentucky players were discussing that the other day.
- Not that Caltech doesn't have a rich athletic tradition. During halftime of the 1961 Rose Bowl thousands of kids in the Washington student section were duped into holding up flip cards that they thought would spell out HUSKIES but instead spelled caltech. At the 1984 Rose Bowl, Caltech students hacked into the scoreboard by remote and changed it to read Caltech 38, MIT 9.
Molecules, slide rules
Watt, ampere!
Fill that cylinder
With that sphere!
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Jan 8, 2007 11:50 AM PST reply actions
CalTech was in my college's conference ...
I too applaud their efforts, though. In the interests of developing well rounded nerds, every student is required to play at least one season of a varsity sport, regardless of talent or athletic ability.
"well rounded nerds"
They wouldn't go for that cheer
How about this one?
Molecules, slide rules
Watt, amperes!
Love me some hot
Engineers!
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Jan 8, 2007 12:04 PM PST up reply actions
Fill that cylinder with that sphere?
I always forget which numbers/operations give you irrational numbers versus transcendental and what the difference is. If quadrature of the circle is impossible because pi is transcendental, then perhaps sphering of the cylinder is similarly impossible if fractional exponentiation give you transcendental numbers. Any math-folks want to weigh in on this?
I don't know ...
Constructible numbers
Transcendental numbers are those (necessarily irrational) numbers that aren't the root of any polynomial with integer coefficients. Constructible numbers are a subset of algebraic (non-transcendental) numbers, involving only quadratic polynomials.
I'm not sure why anyone would want to do a compass and straightedge construction of "cylindering the sphere," but as there are two parameters for the cylinder it looks like it could be done. (For example, if r_sphere = 1, r_cylinder = 1 and h=4/3 would work).
But returning to the real point:
I remember reading in Sports Illustrated sometime in the 1980's about a cheer they had at RPI along the lines of:
e to the x dy dx, e to the x dx
square root, cube root, cosine, sine
3.14159
Disintegrate 'em RPI
and I've since heard similar cheers credited to other techie schools.
cylindering the sphere
Depends which way you go.
r_cylinder = r_sphere
h = 4/3 r_sphere
works.
However, going the other way and defining
alpha = h/r_sphere
gives
r_sphere = (0.75 alpha)^1/3 r_cylinder
Fractional exponentiation gives at worst irrational numbers, since transcendental numbers are precisely those irrationals that are not roots of algebraic equations. Unfortunately cube (or higher) roots defy general construction, so if that is your criterion you're stuck.
by green star oakland on Jan 8, 2007 12:40 PM PST up reply actions
Riccardi says "no" to trading Rios
http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Baseball/MLB/Toronto/2007/01/08/3235781-sun.html
Makes sense. That rotation is 10 times better than the Met's rotation. I can understand the Blue Jays not making a move for a pitcher. The Met's though-no excuses, they need a pitcher.
Me too
by BlameChannel53 on Jan 8, 2007 12:25 PM PST up reply actions
In the AL East Ricci has stated the J's
With this exception Ricci's team is very competitive in that division for 2007. With strong starters in place for the #4 & #5 slots the J's may begin as favorites or co-favorites.
A month ago amid trades speculation Toronto media kept the heat on daily as to who what where when and how: regarding the new J's starter. At that time he was a bit incredulous that media could concieve of the trade process being that simple and basically replied they can expect it to go into the season for him to "get the pitcher they need".
Rios will go for pitching and Ricci will work it to the J's benefit, what does he gain by trading Rios before April?
by A s Eh on Jan 8, 2007 7:13 PM PST up reply actions
So this is where the cool kids eat lunch and dump
I'd say they did a pretty good job for '06 and I agree with Devo's analysis, except for expecting big things from Coco Crisp.
Some guy named Sal
pre-emptive correction
Pressure distance?
Indeed I did.
Yep...
Maybe we can get a group
3:30-4:30 p.m. Meet & Greet at Central Mall - 9th
KSAL? WTF?
But...
Will hen be served for tea?
And here I was...
They who smelt it dealt it.
Bloomberg urges calm/offers sage advice:
That's
Infield problems solved
The key, huh?
Perez--the worst season ever?
-Nick Swisher
I think Troy Smith
any GM who takes smith that high should be fired
History tells us
Dear Malcom Gladwell,
Also, you wrote the dumbest fucking article about basketball ever written while purporting to give Moneyball-style analysis.
Look what you've done. You've caused me to rant on a baseball blog to people most of whom I'm quite certain don't care about your stupid gimmicks which are barely tangentially related to the A's.
Dammit.
i haven't read it yet
i think a year or so ago, he posted some silly idea on his blog about building a successful basketball team by only drafting/signing/trading players who had attended 2-3 specific colleges.
no, it would still be stupid
sometimes that's jj redick.
so if you're a GM, and your teams sucks and you have the first pick b/c you follow gladwellball philosophy, you don't draft oden because he went to ohio state?
no, see ...
Duke is notorious for not producing succesful NBA players.
well...
just in the b's you've got battier, boozer and brand.
amen
100
"You think you understand this, but really you don't understand it at all..."
And then when he "explains" it, it's pretty obvious to anyone who's a rational thinker.
by notsellingjeans on Jan 8, 2007 11:35 PM PST up reply actions

by 

























