The MoneyBall Movie
There was a blurb in ESPN the magazine about Vince Vaughn and George Clooney vying to play Mr. Beane in the film adaptation.
Facing only those two choices, I would go with George Clooney, because he seems a little more like Billy than does Vicne Vaughn does, VAugh is a little too smarmy, and would probably make Billy look more like a swindler than a genius. Clooney could pull off the negotiations better, I could see him doing the part of the book from draft day where he's calling up Steve Phillips, gets the secretary, and asks "whos' the best looking GM in the league?"
I think Kevin Costner would be best in the role, he's done more baseball movies than anyone which is both good (Bull Durham) and bad (For the love of the game)
0 recs |
47 comments
Comments
Yeah, I heard that on KNBR
by teenster on Sep 1, 2006 5:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i am booking a flight to LA
by ak_A on Sep 1, 2006 5:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Show them your third nipple,
by Nico on Sep 1, 2006 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mr. Scaramunga?
by ak_A on Sep 1, 2006 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kevin Costner is my personal deity.
Clooney I could see more as BB, but it would freak me out -- he's one of my LEAST favorite actors, I find the man creepy and distinctly unattractive. While Billy Beane is abso-friggin'-lutely as spicy like hole-in-the-wall-taqueria salsa. Mmmm. They could do better than Clooney for that man, someone with a little more super-stud-crazy factor.
And for a friggin' Moneyball movie, it seems a damn shame to overpay for talent. Let's bring in a C-list actor, pay league minimum for him, and then recast for the sequel when he gets too popular to afford. Quick, someone hit the B-movie shelf at the local video store!
"No. It's Oakland."
by Kyli on Sep 1, 2006 5:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Bruce Campell
by pbruins92 on Sep 1, 2006 5:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nah...
by DMOAS on Sep 1, 2006 5:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was really saying Bruce would be the best
by pbruins92 on Sep 1, 2006 6:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
More Moneyball
It could make a pretty cool flick....
http://s171230060.onlinehome.us/NewsDescription-Movies-11654.htm
by Hang Man on Sep 1, 2006 5:23 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah that's kinda old
From my defunct blog:
[i]As of right now, the movie seems to be just at the script/pre-production phase. Clooney had been rumored for the lead role as Beane but there is some history between him and the current scriptwritter, Stan Cheverin. From 1999-2002, Clooney had been trying to make "The Catcher was a Spy" but the film never got greenlighted, apparently for good reason.
RB: Since Moe Berg keeps coming up, is the movie going to be made?
ND: I don't know, they just keep getting horrible screenplay after horrible screenplay. George Clooney really wanted to make it. And that would be great.
Almost all of Cheverin's scripts are connected to films that were in development hell, a term used to describe films that never got made due to studio, script, casting and all other sorts of changes.
In all likelyhood, it may take the A's winning the World Series for this movie to be made at all least of all true to reality.[/i]
by Genaro on Sep 1, 2006 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Get Charlie Kaufman to write the script
I think Clooney as Beane could work. I always hated Clooney, but lately he's done some stellar work - and he's a definate power player. If anyone could get that movie made, it would be him. Besides, what would the flick really be about? Would it have MLB-sponsored footage of the real games, spliced into the movie? That would be cool, instead of staging any games with hack actors (eg. Shoeless Joe batting on the wrong side of the plate). I suppose Zito could probably play himself.
Seriously, though, Kaufman would, at the least, write a compelling script.
by Scottbass on Sep 1, 2006 6:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If I remember correctly
by Philip Christy on Sep 2, 2006 12:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tell me if I'm wrong...
by mikeA on Sep 1, 2006 6:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Of course!
"No. It's Oakland."
by Kyli on Sep 1, 2006 6:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What would you rather see?
or
Juiced: The Movie
(Personally, I don't want this movie to be made. The book has brought enough unfair criticism upon Billy and upon the A's organization. What kind of damage do you think the movie will do?)
by Crosbino on Sep 1, 2006 6:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probably a lot of damage... to walls.
"No. It's Oakland."
by Kyli on Sep 1, 2006 6:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
it may not suck
clooney could probably do a decent beane, he's a much better actor than vaughn obviously...
i'm wondering if they're even going to try to get in at least some of the analysis-type stuff that's mostly narration in the book. if not, it will be lousy. maybe they could get it in if there's a michael lewis character following beane around as he writes a book about him.
by xbhaskarx on Sep 1, 2006 6:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i changed my mind already
for example, how are they going to do the moneyball draft? depo speaking some random name 99% of the audience has never heard of into the speakerphone, and the a's front office types getting all excited? "we got teahen!"
the average moviegoer just won't get that, so they'll have to change everything so it's more exciting.
by xbhaskarx on Sep 1, 2006 6:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Dude.
And Barry Zito as Young Billy Beane.
Think about it.
"No. It's Oakland."
by Kyli on Sep 1, 2006 6:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I still can't picture it...
It's really has to be LOOSELY adapted.
At the same time, I do agree that maybe the A's have to win it all in order to give it some oomph.
by gmoneymcg on Sep 1, 2006 6:57 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If they can do Fast Food Nation...
I've actually got a baseball script being repped in LA right now that I'm quietly confident will not only be picked up, but will be a great freakin' addition to the baseball movie pantheon.
Two words: Kurt. Russell.
by Ozzz on Sep 1, 2006 8:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Best of luck HOz!
In the meantime, let's get KR to sign with your script!
by gmoneymcg on Sep 1, 2006 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
really?
by Cutthemullet on Sep 2, 2006 4:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hence the nickname.
Thankfully, what I think is decent and what people in the business think is sellable seem to be one and the same, in this instance.
But then, these things go tits up pretty quickly sometimes, so no busting out the champagne just yet.
by Ozzz on Sep 2, 2006 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I want Kevin Spacey for this role.
by Sharon on Sep 1, 2006 7:06 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow...
In response to this being a horrible movie: yeah, it almost certainly will. But we're dreaming here. Besides, unless it's monstrously bad, just about everyone here will see it, right? And if they're talking about George Clooney playing Beane, it's gotta have something going for it.
by Philip Christy on Sep 2, 2006 12:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Vince Vaughn...
by Poppy on Sep 1, 2006 7:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think this is awesome!!
by OaktownRajah on Sep 1, 2006 10:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Director / Writer Factor is far more important --
Depending on how well the A's do from here on out will determine if an important (powerful) Producer and/or Director attaches themselves to the project and that will determine, more or less, the cast. If they win it all it is likely this movie will get very hot and then they will be fighting to get in on it like sharks in bloody water. It could do well for the PR of the team to say the least.
It seems the one important factor is how much, if any, control Michael Lewis has in approving the script, Director, etc. (he probably has very little, but who knows).
I personally don't think the Beane role should go to a "big" actor-- they would mess it up. Clooney and Spacey are good ideas but somehow they are not right either (and DEFINITLY not Costner).
by Carlos1118 on Sep 2, 2006 1:15 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Typo --
Someone a little more up and comming ... I'm not sure who right now.
by Carlos1118 on Sep 2, 2006 1:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tom Hanks
by prana160 on Sep 2, 2006 1:28 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That could be cool--
by Carlos1118 on Sep 2, 2006 1:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Universal has an option?
Unusual perhaps?
by Genaro on Sep 2, 2006 5:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My Bad--
by Carlos1118 on Sep 2, 2006 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
if they can actually pull this off...
I really think that the only way they could pull this off is if it's presented as if Billy Beane wrote a first-person account for the script--in other words, what Joe Morgan will assume about the movie if it does indeed get released.
by Cutthemullet on Sep 2, 2006 5:11 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
A movie?!?
by str8tarrow on Sep 2, 2006 8:54 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
so will beane write the script and direct?
by xbhaskarx on Sep 2, 2006 9:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mickey Rourke
what the heck is the plot of this movie anyways? Last shot is them losing in the division series for the 475th time in a row, and blah blah blah? If they could show the A's win it all and close to "we are the champions" or something it would be cool
by closetasfan on Sep 2, 2006 9:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah Rourke would be sweet
by Genaro on Sep 2, 2006 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is like reading an episode of 'Entourage'!
by str8tarrow on Sep 3, 2006 8:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Howsabout Charlie Sheen?
by The Dogfather on Sep 4, 2006 12:57 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















