Andrew Jones is claimed off Waivers by unnamed team.
Buster Olney is reporting:
"With Andruw Jones only days away from gaining trade veto power, the All-Star center fielder was claimed on waivers by an unnamed team, leaving the Braves until 1 p.m. ET Saturday to decide whether to take their last opportunity to deal Jones unfettered."
The article goes onto say:
"That Jones was placed on waivers is unremarkable; he was one of hundreds of players, including many stars, who were placed on waivers earlier this week. What makes Jones' situation interesting is that on Aug. 15, he will gain 10-and-5 rights -- 10 years in the big leagues, five with the same team -- to block any proposed trade.
Multiple teams placed claims on Jones, according to major-league sources. But on Thursday afternoon, one team was awarded a claim on Jones. Now the Braves have two choices -- either work out a trade with the team who placed the claim by Saturday or pull Jones back from waivers. If they pull him back, they cannot trade him again for the rest of this season.
The Boston Red Sox tried to deal for Jones leading up to the trade deadline, with some intent to try to flip him to the Houston Astros for Roy Oswalt. Some scouts also think that the Los Angeles Angels, who've been looking for a bat, might have high interest in Jones."
This may be bad news if <gulp> Anaheim is said unnamed team. Is there any chance that Oakland can be this team <hopes>... What do you think?
0 recs |
41 comments
|
Comments
according to the rules (via wiki)
It's hard for me to imagine that no NL team would've claimed him before any AL team.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball_transactions#Waivers
Waivers
Any player under contract may be placed on waivers at any time. If a player is waived, any team may claim him. If more than one team claims a player from waivers, the team with the lowest record in the player's league gets preference. If no team in the player's league claims him, the claiming team with the lowest record in the other league gets preference. The previous year's standings are used during the first month of a season to determine preference.
If a team claims a player off waivers and has the viable claim as described above, his first team may choose one of the following:
* arrange a trade with the new team for that player within two business days of the claim; or
* rescind the request and keep the player on their major league roster, effectively canceling the waiver; or
* do nothing and allow the claiming team to assume the player's existing contract, pay a waiver fee to the first team, and place him on their active major league roster
If a player is claimed and the option to rescind is used, this option to rescind a waiver may not be used again for that player in that season. If no team claims a player from waivers in three business days, the player has cleared waivers and may be assigned to a minor league team, traded, or released outright.
The waiver "wire" is a secret within the personnel of the Major League Baseball clubs; no announcement of a waiver is made until a transaction actually occurs. Many players are often quietly waived during the August "waiver-required" trading period to gauge trade interest in a particular player. Usually, when the player is claimed, the waiving team will rescind the waiver to avoid losing the player unless a trade can be worked out with the claiming team.
waiver wire
I've read that they aren't told
its not anaheim
by tonyeee on Aug 4, 2006 3:13 PM PDT reply actions
errr
by tonyeee on Aug 4, 2006 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Agreed, no way Andruw made it thru the NL
by The Hypocrite on Aug 4, 2006 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions
Is that true?
mlb is correct, the person you responded to is not
according to ESPN same league first
(A) If only one claim is entered, the player's contract is assigned to that claiming club.
(B) If more than one club in the same league makes claims, the club currently lower in the standings gets the player.
(C) If clubs in both leagues claim the player, preference shall always go to the club in the same league as the club requesting waivers.
f the club doesn't withdraw the waiver request, the player's contract is assigned in the following manner:
(A) If only one claim is entered, the player's contract is assigned to that claiming club.
(B) If more than one club in the same league makes claims, the club currently lower in the standings gets the player.
(C) If clubs in both leagues claim the player, preference shall always go to the club in the same league as the club requesting waivers.
i think they changed it
really?
i could be wrong
confidence level = low
i don't know much about this and i've heard conflicting info...
THIRD OPTION
13.5 Million next year is a lot with all the other wholes the braves have.
Not likely but braves are looking to dump Salary and this is last chance as he would likely exercises veto moving forward.
it can't be LAoA, can it?
I don't think Schuerholz would settle for less than Kendrick and Aybar, LAoA's main young studs, if they were to attempt a trade either, so my guess is it's the Astros, who were pressuring Boston last week to trade 3 guys for Jones so they could flip him to Houston for Roy Oswalt.
Houston or even the Giants
No way he made it to the AL.
16 teams in the NL passed on a 13 million dollar 50 homer guy?
No way. 50 homers on today's market is a 20 million dollar commodity.
by The Hypocrite on Aug 4, 2006 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Reason #2 it wasn't the Angels...
The Rangers probably figure
<chortles>
Ha ha
by Threepwood XX on Aug 4, 2006 5:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Oakland couldn't do anything to stop 'em
Oh...
by Threepwood XX on Aug 4, 2006 5:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Hee hee hee
<says it over and over, never stops being tickled>
Careful Nico
You don't want to choke on your own tongue, do you?
Kkhhackkhh!!!
Why on earth
Oh.
by WhiteElephantGuy on Aug 4, 2006 5:55 PM PDT reply actions
Do not hate
by RF A-hole on Aug 5, 2006 12:56 AM PDT reply actions
Oh - oh!
Braves Scouts Attended Rangers Game Thursday
According to the Dallas Morning News Seamheads blog, two Braves scouts attended Thursday's Rangers-Angels game.
Evan Grant theorizes that the Rangers may have claimed Andruw Jones to block the Angels. He also described the scouts' attendance as "unusual."
Said Buster Olney today on Jones:
"If they don't trade him today without getting his approval then they never will be able to. If Jones is in the lineup against the Reds this afternoon, we'll know he's staying, at least until the offseason."
Who said winning the AL West would be easy?
by A s Eh on Aug 5, 2006 9:06 AM PDT reply actions
unless it no longer works like that
I wish there was a way to find out
And even if the league thing has changed, I still think if multiple teams claim him those with a worse WL record this year would have preference.
and again, it's always possible that the Braves would pull him off waivers.
andruw is in the lineup today.
by larrysgurl on Aug 5, 2006 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions
In the line-up
Remember
Yes
45 minutes ago
ESPNews is worthless on this topic.
too many words
many are asking whether the preference
http://baseballanalysts.com/archives/2006/08/death_taxes_and_1.php
Keith, one particular area of confusion involves the priority of waiver claims for major league waivers. I've heard from numerous sources that the AL/NL distinction has been eliminated, but multiple news articles (and Steve Phillips just yesterday) say that the claim priority still goes AL teams, then NL teams, for a player waived by an AL team, for example. Which is it?
BTW here's the link to the Phillips article. I think, however, that it was written a year ago.
http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/story?columnist=phillips_steve&id=2130379&action=logi n&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fmlb%2fcolumns%2fstory%3fcolumnist%3dphillips_st eve%26id%3d2130379
Jones is playing today
I don't think he's going anywhere til at least the end of the season.

by 






















