Under the Radar: The A's and the Media
Nobody's taking notice, right? And those who do are often being dismissive. That's okay. They're missing a story that we're all seeing firsthand, a story that they will eventually catch up to.
It's funny to see the Dodgers post essentially the same record as the A's for 17 games, but be at the center of ten times the number of stories. Everybody loves the Dodgers, it seems; yet everybody wants to explain why the A's don't really deserve any love.
Take the story at Baseball Prospectus today (paid content). As Salb detailed in the DLD it misanalyzes the A's in some significant ways. But that's to be expected. The guys at BP often write with an undeserved authority. Joe Sheehan, who wrote the article, is definitely one who does. Sure, there are many good insights to be gleaned at BP, but an overview of our team isn't going to be worth much to most of us. And that goes for the stuff at ESPN, the Hit Lists and Power Rankings, the flippant columns by the likes of Bill Simmons. It's all going to tell us much, much less than we already know.
Because most of us know the team better than BP and ESPN and the rest do. We watch them much, much more; can contextualize statistics; we know the difference in performance between now and, say, April; and we see beyond run differential to how they're actually winning. We know about Swish's weight loss, about Chavy's forearms, about Haren's last five starts, about Loaiza's slight improvement, about Calero's value, about Frank Thomas since Chicago, and on and on.
The very, very obvious story to write about the A's right now and that most people are writing--if they even bother--is that they'll win the West but nothing more. That they're no real threat. Whatever. That's now. That story will change. Dan Haren will likely be a developing story. The A's offense "since the return of Bradley" will be a developing story. Their bullpen and Frank Thomas will get more of the attention they deserve.
If the A's continue to win, their winning will need to be explained beyond, "They're lucky and they play good defense." They will have to be reckoned with--by both the media and by their playoff opponents.
0 recs |
27 comments
Comments
The Dodgers
The A's are dwarfed in the media by their sisters across the bay and it is well known the A's put up great numbers in Aug/Sept, nothing new.
by Hit4TheCycle on Aug 17, 2006 8:34 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That's how we roll!
by carp on Aug 17, 2006 8:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I kinda like it this way
The Word: Or bitter sports journalists.
by JLaff on Aug 17, 2006 8:56 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I love that we are under the radar........
by stthomasfan on Aug 17, 2006 9:06 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
to define "market"
by ucla kid on Aug 17, 2006 9:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm taking notice
by jeepers on Aug 17, 2006 9:36 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
On ESPN's Thursday Game
by Hit4TheCycle on Aug 17, 2006 9:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
A's getting some press
by Charlie Brown on Aug 18, 2006 7:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
AN is more important
by eshock on Aug 17, 2006 11:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
This is the A's deal and I hate to say it
Even though they are our little secret on a national scope, it is not like the rest of the country is unaware of their existence. It is due to several things:
Secondary team in the market.
Ratings, attendance, future home issues.
Oh for Nine ALDS stigma.
Moneyball backlash.
Playing on the West Coast (if the Pilgrims landed at Stinson, the East Coast would still be wilderness - thank God that didn't happen).
Constantly losing free agents.
Librarian managers.
The Angels 2002 title.
Getting hot while people are on vacation, during the overblown NFL preseason, Olympics, back to school.
Zero national media shills.
The thing is, most semi hard-core baseball fans, no matter where they live, would get behind the A's in a heartbeat. Personalities you can relate to, a clubhouse that every player (no matter race, attitude, resume, etc.) has loved for seven years running, almost zero appearances in the police blotter, plenty of home-grown talent, a very loyal core base of 15-20k non cell-phone type fans (drums, flags, cowbells, banjos and a trumpet, come on!!), overall underdog status, the Bill Walsh type front office offspring around the league, affordable tickets, no head-hunter pitchers, no hired mercenaries, fireworks viewing from the field, 5,000 registered AN users from around the globe, etc.
Ramon's bunt was not as good as it gets.
by southofcruiseamerica on Aug 18, 2006 12:34 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Loaiza, Sauerbeck and Bradley
by WaddellCanseco on Aug 18, 2006 4:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thus the use of the word
by southofcruiseamerica on Aug 18, 2006 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
being under the radar IS the a's
by harendaman365 on Aug 18, 2006 7:40 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
by LowcountryJoe on Aug 18, 2006 8:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget pre-season
by boilerdan on Aug 18, 2006 7:49 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
by sf drift king on Aug 18, 2006 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"See I told you so..."
At that point you can expect the stories of the A's injuries and how that affected their record as well as how their incredible bullpen saved the year. No one at that point will call Blanton sophomoric in his abilties, rather they will point to the 15+ wins he had this year and how he's "developed into another fine pitcher in the tradition of Mulder, Hudson etc."
This is all okay by me. What's disappointing for the rest of the country is that they did enjoy the journey along the way as intensely as we did. If we do win it all, it will be fun to look back on all of these posts and know we chronicled this season in ways journalists may never understand.
by Gerard on Aug 18, 2006 8:35 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't there a book written with that exact title?
by LowcountryJoe on Aug 18, 2006 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"about Loaiza's slight improvement"
Side Note: If the playoffs started today, wouldn't it be smart to start Danny Haren in Game 1? Zito has consistently shown that he can't handle the Big Games this season.
Thoughts?
by Colorado Fan on Aug 18, 2006 9:09 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Loaiza > Zito?
j/k
by peanut gallery on Aug 18, 2006 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I had the choice...
Actually, don't ask me. Ask the Texas Rangers who they would rather face.
I'd be willing to bet Loaiza's ERA is better than Zito's from Aug 1st - End of Season...thus, I have more faith in Loaiza.
by Colorado Fan on Aug 18, 2006 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Almost forgot
by peanut gallery on Aug 18, 2006 9:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
by Colorado Fan on Aug 18, 2006 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Radio Coverage ...
by NoeValley on Aug 18, 2006 9:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















