Should Oakland trade for Ben Broussard?
Would it be worth while for the A's to trade for Ben Broussard?
What do you think it would take to get him and would it be worth it.
With Eduardo Perez being dealed to the Mariners and Victor Martinez being moved to 1b due to lack of Catching ability and Ryan Garko being called up I think that Ben Broussard has to be on the market.
I think if we move DJ to another team and trade for Broussard it would be moer beneficial to the team.
This opens up the opportunity for more platooning.
At 1b we could have Nick Swisher against Lefties and Ben Broussard against Righties.
At LF we could have Bobby Kielty against Lefties and Nick Swisher against Righties.
What are you thoughts about this?
0 recs |
22 comments
Comments
As I mentioned in another thread,
If I were the Indians, however, having lots of hitting yet still not winning, I would insist on some good pitching in any deal, and that would probably mean losing someone from the Blanton, Street, Windsor, Duke quartet.
by Nico on Jun 30, 2006 6:20 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nah
by Zabat on Jun 30, 2006 8:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
in my opinion blanton is hurting the A's more then
by larrysgurl on Jul 1, 2006 12:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Huh??
How soon we forget his second half last year...
by OaktownPower on Jul 1, 2006 8:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually...
by OaktownPower on Jul 1, 2006 8:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If trading Blanton means
by Nico on Jul 1, 2006 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's a combination of a lot of things for me.
by larrysgurl on Jul 1, 2006 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No arguments there--
by Nico on Jul 1, 2006 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
if they were to trade blanton wouldn't saarloos
by larrysgurl on Jul 1, 2006 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not until Harden gets back,
by Nico on Jul 1, 2006 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'm not giving up on zito yet.
by larrysgurl on Jul 1, 2006 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you confident enough
by Nico on Jul 1, 2006 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
it depends on who blanton is traded for. i just
by larrysgurl on Jul 1, 2006 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because Saarloos and Halsey
by Nico on Jul 1, 2006 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
this year blanton has not been much better then
by larrysgurl on Jul 1, 2006 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just this year,
I'm not a big Blanton fan, but one has to keep Saarloos and Halsey in perspective: Saarloos is no better than a #5 starter, and Halsey is no better than a #6 starter.
by Nico on Jul 1, 2006 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
LAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRYYYYYYYYY
Jones
by znk916 on Jul 1, 2006 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seattle
by arch on Jun 30, 2006 6:33 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i think broussard is kind of a fluke.
by CaliAsFan on Jul 1, 2006 12:03 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
A guy who crushes RHP
by Nico on Jul 1, 2006 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eh
I suppose he'd be a decent rental player assuming we don't have to give up alot but considering what the Mariners gave up (approx B-grade prospect) to get Perez and the fact that Broussard has more value as the lefty part of the platoon, I think we'd be better off looking elsewhere.
by znk916 on Jul 1, 2006 6:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















