Coming: PBS documentary on the A's
I was watching the local news this morning (I'm in Kansas City) and there was a lengthy piece on a new PBS documentary that's currently filming here. Yes, it's on the A's - the Kansas City A's.
They showed some of the archive footage of the A's playing at the old Municipal Stadium, and a long informational piece on Charlie Finley ("He's still hated in Kansas City", said the reporter "for moving the team to Oakland". Given the current state of the Royals, this might be more true now than ever).
They're interviewing many of the former KC A's players and they spoke of the greats who played here for the A's - Roger Maris, Catfish, etc.
It looks like we'll get to see some excellent history of our favorite team soon on your local PBS station.
Here's a link to the story: Kansas City A's Documentary
As a side note, my brother-in-law was a huge A's fan when they played here. He still has a collection of stadium giveaways from those days, including a really funky KC A's baseball bat from bat day. Sadly, he's become a Royals fan but I'm still trying to bring him back from the brink of hopelessness.
0 recs |
11 comments
Comments
traitors!
i suspect the big bad wolff is behind this...
by xbhaskarx on May 14, 2006 6:09 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
LOL.......
by BleacherDave on May 15, 2006 8:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oakland (KC) A's
by SunnyDay on May 14, 2006 7:35 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I would love to hear more
I have always had the A's and I feel like I was born an A's fan. I wonder what it would have been like if I were around in 68 when they first came.
by Athletics fan and runner on May 14, 2006 8:05 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If you want to read some really fun stuff...
The Baker Bowl!
by Ozzz on May 14, 2006 7:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There's a good Bill James essay...
James is a native of the KC area, so he has a particular interest in those years.
IIRC, James argues that the A's years in Kansas City, 1955-1967, are among the worst thirteen years of any big league franchise in baseball history. The A's essentially became a kind of informal farm team for the Yankees, completing a series of boneheaded trades with the Bronx bombers in which young talent was sent to NY in exchange for Yankee has-beens like Don Larsen.
James also has a piece somewhere (perhaps also in the Historical Baseball Abstract) about the extraordinary boom-bust history of the Athletics from their creation in 1901. The A's have almost never been mediocre. They tend to either be at the top of their league (or division) or at the bottom.
by GreenNGoldSooner on May 14, 2006 8:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It makes you wonder...
Granted, the Royals had a brief streak of being decent, but if you look at the outfield they had (for a short time) - Dye, Damon, and Beltran - the return they got for these players might challenge the KC A's for poor return for value.
However, there was one consistently great team which played in KC - the Monarchs of the old Negro League. They fielded possibly some of the greatest baseball teams in history.
by coffee roaster on May 14, 2006 8:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not the town.
You could have said the same thing about Cleveland, the Tribe doing nothing for 40 years, the Browns being hopeless before that, Ray Chapman being killed on the field in 1920, and the Spiders being the worst team in MLB history before that.
As an ex-Philadelphian, I could go chapter and vers with that city as well. And so on, and so on.
All it took to make the town a good place for baseball was good ownership. Same as anywhere.
DMt
by DMtShooter on May 15, 2006 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is another PBS Documentary...
by jjham15 on May 15, 2006 10:29 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
kansas city a's game
by smasfan on May 15, 2006 4:56 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs























