Blanton for Milledge?
MLB.com is talking about rumors of a Blanton and Milledge swap.
Mets' Milledge, A's Blanton possible swap: Oakland assistant GM David Forst was asked about a rumored deal that would sent A's right-hander Joe Blanton to the Mets for outfielder Lastings Milledge: "We haven't had specific conversations about players. [GM] Billy [Beane] has talked to [Mets GM] Omar [Minaya] several times, mainly because Omar likes to make deals, but we haven't discussed any specific deals." When asked if the A's would he hesitant to trade starting pitching, Forst said: "We would be open to any deal if it made sense."Of course, this is just a rumor and we all know what Beane says about rumors, but since we're all looking for things to talk about... I like this deal... A LOT. Blanton appears to be a 3, 4, or 5 starter the rest of his career. Maybe, I'm missing something but I'm not sold that he's anything more than that. Milledge is probably not quite as good as the east coast media makes him out to be, but it sounds like the guy is definitely an everyday OFer. He could play LF everyday for the next few years. I also very sure that Beane would do this in a heart beat... unless he thinks he can milk Omar for more. http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/article.jsp?ymd=20061205&content_id=1751300&vkey=hotstove 2006&fext=.jsp
92 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The reality is that if the A's
But if it is true
by haren4prez on Dec 5, 2006 8:45 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah
-Nick Swisher
They just might be...
Depends:
LOL at wikipedia

lol
More Wiki fun:
o_o
Someone's been editing Zito's page
Barry Zito did not attend high school due to anal cancer that resulted in several hospitalizations. However, the anal cancer went into remission after Barry was sexually violated by a Samoan warrior.
I did not know that about him...
did you do this?
if they do that trade...
except...
I don't think that's a bad deal
Only reason to make this deal...
Question: If Beane could make such a flip why couldn't Minaya?
Answer: There must be other players involved, one coming from the Mets to Oakland; one going from Oakland to parts unknown.
Who be the 3rd party?
Why would that be the only reason to make the deal
Joe Blanton's done nothing in two seasons now to indicate that he'd be discenrably different from, say, Halsey or Saarloos, next season. Eats innings and keeps his ERA under 5.00.
by walk off bunt on Dec 5, 2006 9:56 PM PST up reply actions
I disagree
I also think Blanton is better than he showed last year.
i agree with that
i agree with grover and X
His chances of living up to it are more than 0%.
by WaddellCanseco on Dec 6, 2006 12:55 AM PST up reply actions
That didn't make a lot of sense
I'll give it to you
But I think the potential is worth it, and I think you guys are all overvaluing Blanton here a bit. I really think at this point Blanton is a "what you see is what you get" kind of guy.
by walk off bunt on Dec 6, 2006 7:28 AM PST up reply actions
Blanton
right gover
bad bad idea.
Blanton=Jeff Suppan
Also...
vice versa might be the bigger factor...
If you trade a 200+ inning starter shouldn't you
If Heilman comes over also I'd try it
by Billy Ball 2005 on Dec 5, 2006 9:34 PM PST reply actions
Well, let me put it this way...
If you trade a 200+ inning starter shouldn't you
If Heilman comes over also I'd try it
by Billy Ball 2005 on Dec 5, 2006 9:35 PM PST reply actions
I disagreed with you
I disagree with you, grover,
Then there is no need to go for 3!
by Billy Ball 2005 on Dec 5, 2006 9:52 PM PST up reply actions
From oakland.athletics.mlb.com
"He squelched a rumor that the Athletics and New York Mets were discussing a potential trade that would send starting pitcher Joe Blanton to the Mets for outfielder Lastings Milledge."
Well, so much for that. Let's work on getting Reggie Sanders over here. Not for Cupcakes, but maybe a smaller package deal.
by haren4prez on Dec 5, 2006 9:51 PM PST reply actions
Why?
by walk off bunt on Dec 5, 2006 9:57 PM PST up reply actions
One day Reggie Sanders is going to die
And on that day I can finally rest easy knowing that there will be no more calls for his arrival in Oakland... or whatever the Hell this team will be called in the coming years.
Why the Fuck do we want a 39 year old OFer who can't stay healthy and struggles to hit RH pitching?
but
by Cutthemullet on Dec 5, 2006 10:04 PM PST up reply actions
Then I won't give a damn either way.
heh
by Cutthemullet on Dec 5, 2006 10:06 PM PST up reply actions
When they finally drop the Big One
by haren4prez on Dec 5, 2006 10:11 PM PST up reply actions
So I guess
by Athletics fan and runner on Dec 6, 2006 11:35 AM PST up reply actions
Definitely a Tweenkie
by Billy Ball 2005 on Dec 6, 2006 2:54 PM PST up reply actions
If we trade Blanton to the Phillies
We could include Crosby in the deal
How da yiz want your shortstop, hun?
Milledge is a heart breaker
I don't think Milledge will ever live up to the hype.
Milledge does have less serve time
by scottofchico on Dec 5, 2006 10:41 PM PST reply actions
Well, I know it will never come to pass
The Lineup and Rotation if the trade had been done...
C1 Kendall
CF Kotsay
RF Bradley
1B Swisher
3B Chavez
DH Piazza
LF Milledge
SS Crosby
2B Ellis
SP Harden
SP Haren
SP Loaiza
SP Kennedy
SP Windsor
That rotation worries me a little,
Just a hunch...
Then you could have Kennedy, Gaudin, and Windsor fight it out for the fifth spot.
Harden
Haren
Loaiza
Heilman
Gaudin/Kennedy
Well it's true that rotation is a bit more risky then one with Blanton in it, it has more potential for the long term. The A's are a team that needs a yearly infusion of prospects to keep costs down and I really don't think Beane can afford to let another year go by without any new prospect additions so a rotation like that is a risk the A's need to take.
by Threepwood XX on Dec 6, 2006 12:11 AM PST up reply actions
I like it if only if A's get Heilman too
He was 20 years old last year.
The plot thickens
That trade would be insane
Here's how it would progress:
Harden for Milledge
...becomes...
Harden for Milledge, Heilman, and Wright
...which becomes...
Harden and Blanton for Milledge, Heilman, and Wright
...which becomes...
Blanton for Milledge.
But I still think that rumor is b.s. Even with his injury history, Harden is just as likely to dominate over the next few years as is Milledge, who has no track record of success in the majors at all.
If Wright were brought up by Beane
Otherwise, I feel what you're saying.
by walk off bunt on Dec 6, 2006 7:26 AM PST up reply actions
Link
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/2006-12-06-have-nots-bargains_x.htm
I'd do Harden for Lastings, Vargas, and another bat.
Correction
You're pretty demanding, jubjub
There's a lot of folks here on AN who would do Harden for free!
They can have Harden
lets me get this straight
But you love the two pitch Pelfrey?
I'm saying if the price was Harden
I don't push as hard for pitching if the deal is for Blanton.
milledge is a top prospect!
by Nick86 on Dec 6, 2006 8:08 AM PST reply actions
Prospect vs. young, established big league SP
Damn straight it would cost more than than Milledge to land Blanton.
Agree.
Zito
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2006/12/mets_rumor_roun.html#comments
I think we all know that Beane covets Milledge, Heilman, & Pelfrey - Can we get 2 of 3 for Blanton, Calero, S. Casilla?
Similar to a Mets trade of the 1980s
That would be a HORRIBLE trade:
You are talking about trading an established and CHEAP major league pitcher for a prospect?
It would take more than Milledge. maybe we can package Millhouse and Blanton for Milledge and one of thier young arms, but that would be what it would take for me.
by saint @ Athletics Nation on Dec 6, 2006 8:47 AM PST reply actions
i'd guess
by Nick86 on Dec 6, 2006 8:54 AM PST reply actions
They'd say
Now the latest rumors involve Harden
grover
by Nick86 on Dec 6, 2006 9:16 AM PST reply actions
1 in the hand is better than 2 in the bush
Lot's of people find Milledge desirable, I don't. Which isn't that big of a deal except when assessing trade value.
Milledge is a prospect. Blanton an established big league pitcher. Joe is durable and cheap and he's had success in the Show. You simply can't say the same about Milledge.
Pitching is at a premium right now, Blanton is worth more than 1 stud prospect. How much more is open to debate.
here's somthing
LaRoche and Giles
right
Are you kidding me?
cbs sportsline:
- i tend to believe this one, given the HX.
Question: If the Mets didn't trade for Zito
because...
What an asset for the Mets...
Minaya can look for pitchers with outstanding stuff but question marks (health/mechanics/control), and take risks on them that other teams wouldn't.
Minaya can take a flier on a pitcher with outstanding stuff like Ambiorix Burgos because he knows Peterson can fix him.
Perhaps, Peterson can help Harden remain healthier than he has with the A's.
by notsellingjeans on Dec 6, 2006 12:12 PM PST reply actions
I guess I'm way off here
by Nick86 on Dec 6, 2006 12:18 PM PST reply actions
I'd take LaRoche
IMO, Dan Johnson's upside is Adam LaRoche. Why not trade him for a guy who we'd be hoping he'd become? I don't think the Braves would want DJ, though, they think Scott Thorman will fill in for him fine (I disagree, but that's a different issue). I think we'd have to do something like Calero for LaRoche. They seem desperate for bullpen help, so maybe they'd do it straight-up? Given the price of relief pitching (thank you, Orioles), it's possible. I think the money would end up close to a wash in '07 (LaRoche at $420K in '06, Calero at $850K, both up for arby, I think).
Calero seems like a steal, so I'd hate to see him go, but we need some offensive help and it would move Swishy to the OF.
eric
by Nick86 on Dec 6, 2006 3:41 PM PST reply actions

by 
























