no 1st rounder for zito, right?
because the giants had one of the 15 worst records in baseball last year, they keep their #1, right? we get a sandwich + the giants 2nd round pick, correct? if that's true...well, that blows. i never liked that rule. considering the parity in the middle of MLB (the top teams usually stay the same), there isn't a hell of a lot of difference between having the 10th worst record and the 17th worst record. i understand protecting the absolute worst teams - limiting it to the 5 worst teams makes sense. oh well, at least the giants 2nd round pick will be a high one.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
2nd round pick
Dammit,
Curse youuuuuu, Sabean! <shakes fist>
"No. It's Oakland."
As I've said before
this compensation thing is ridiculous
hold up - giants got mets 1st round pick, right?
Life isn't fair
He signed Bonds, insuring sold-out crowds for at least half the season.
And he signed Barry Zito.
so what do the A's get ?
A's get...
Two Supp. 1st round picks (#35-ish and one in the mid-50's).
Giants' 2nd round pick (low-70's) and their own 2nd round pick (mid-80's).
Nothing for Payton. (No Arby offer, remember?)
oh right, thanks
by vk on Dec 28, 2006 4:18 PM PST up reply actions
dammit all!!!!
by guy incognito on Dec 28, 2006 12:18 PM PST up reply actions
Thems the rules
Yeah, me too
by BlameChannel53 on Dec 28, 2006 12:47 PM PST up reply actions
I guess we A's fans can still be glad
by Philip Christy on Dec 28, 2006 12:56 PM PST up reply actions
Not a bad winter for Sabean
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Dec 28, 2006 1:51 PM PST up reply actions

by 
























