DLD 01/11/2006 -- Oakland Ham Fighter?
According to Ken Rosenthal, Billy Beane has good things to say about Trey Hillman.
"I've heard nothing but great things about him," A's general manager Billy Beane says. "And I've heard it from a lot of people I really respect, all coming from different angles, none of whom are connected to each other."Rosenthal also says Beane is confident that Frank Thomas will return.
Beane remains confident of re-signing designated hitter Frank Thomas to a two-year deal; he said he has been in contact with Thomas' agent, Arn Tellem, over the last few days. "Each time we talk there is some type of progress toward resolution," Beane says. "Something like this, given his year, does not get done right away. I don't think they're being unreasonable. I don't think they think we're being unreasonable. The desire for both of us is to get something done."
0 recs |
102 comments
Comments
Fun with euphemisms.
Regarding Gary Sheffield:
"Shot his [bullets]" is hereby nominated for a spot in the AN euphemism hierarchy.
by salb918 on Nov 1, 2006 7:23 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Silly Heyman
by jeepers on Nov 1, 2006 8:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A silent Sheffield is a deadly Sheffield.
by Ozzz on Nov 1, 2006 8:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Whoops.
by salb918 on Nov 1, 2006 8:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
OK, what bugs me about that ...
The dip[bullet] editor who Bowdlerized that quote would probably have a problem with "bunghole" appearing in a family newspaper. Sheesh! Have these people never been to Colonial Williamsburg?
by monkeyball on Nov 1, 2006 9:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm
by billyball1981 on Nov 1, 2006 7:45 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
The team is called
They are owned by Nippon Ham, a meatpacking concern.
In Japan, the Oakland Athletics would probably be called the Levi's Athletics, or the Fisher-Wolff-Beane Athletics.
The Mariners would be the Nintendo Mariners...
You get the drift...
by K56 on Nov 2, 2006 10:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
While Trick or Treating last night
by Amnesiac727 on Nov 1, 2006 8:12 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Also known as
by jeepers on Nov 1, 2006 8:27 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Keep it away from SUVs too
by jeepers on Nov 1, 2006 8:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nope
by gigglingone on Nov 1, 2006 8:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oakland's own fighting ham
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Nov 1, 2006 8:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I can see it now.
Ken: Watching Giambi go back to the dugout, he looks like a piece of smoked meat himself.
Bill: <rolls over>
by salb918 on Nov 1, 2006 9:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Bill was OK with the sponsors
"Ray Fosse has gone to the media lounge to make me up a tub of my favorite ballgame snack, popcorn with jalapenos, relish, and Prime Smoke Meat products! Don't settle for composites...make sure you choose only PRIIIIIIME Smoked Meats!"
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Nov 1, 2006 9:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe if Denny Neagle
by jeepers on Nov 1, 2006 9:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Anyone want a job?
http://jobsearch.mlb.careers.monster.com/
by gigglingone on Nov 1, 2006 9:16 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks!
by JLaff on Nov 1, 2006 9:27 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
good luck!!
by gigglingone on Nov 1, 2006 5:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
hmm the pitch f/x operator one is interesting...
K-Zone don't lie!
by drmmerchk on Nov 1, 2006 11:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Does that mean...
by Poppy on Nov 1, 2006 11:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ooh, Chic Euro Dating!
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Nov 1, 2006 9:34 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
The A's
I will begin my annual two weeks of pretending the Warriors might be goo.
by mikeA on Nov 1, 2006 9:37 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
It was better
by andeux on Nov 1, 2006 9:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, the extra d Foyles the more precise meaning
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Nov 1, 2006 9:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't want the Warriors
by mikeA on Nov 1, 2006 9:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the Warriors might be [bullets]
by ArakSOT on Nov 1, 2006 9:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Reminds me of the Letterman joke:
by DavidA on Nov 1, 2006 10:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Also reminds me of Letterman
This was a ways back...
by easyraider on Nov 1, 2006 11:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Astros cut ties to Bagwell
I assume he's calling it a career, too.
by salb918 on Nov 1, 2006 9:59 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
would the As have any interest in Piazza?
by closetasfan on Nov 1, 2006 10:01 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm interested
by mikeA on Nov 1, 2006 10:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
only if we don't re-sign Frank
by monkeyball on Nov 1, 2006 10:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
More Matsuzaka matters
Caple also gets off a good line about the posting to negotiate process: "Paying money for the right to negotiate with (Scott) Boras is...like paying for the right to be audited by the IRS."
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Nov 1, 2006 10:27 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
That's nothing
The star righthander for Komadai Tomakomai, the 2006 runner-up team, is named Masahiro Tanaka, recent No. 1 pick in the Japan amateur draft. He throws in the mid-90s and has broken all of Matsuzaka's high school strikeout records. As the Koshien moved toward the championship round, Tanaka pitched four complete-game victories in as many days, including a nationally televised 15-inning classic. Over the span of a week, the kid threw more than 800 pitches. Nobody moaned about his pitch counts, however.
by salb918 on Nov 1, 2006 10:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Holy smokes!
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Nov 1, 2006 10:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Makes me wonder
by jeepers on Nov 1, 2006 10:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder similarly
by TurnTwo on Nov 1, 2006 11:03 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Workloads
Regulating pitch counts only regulates a pitcher's workload. Whereas, how hard a pitcher throws and what pitches he throws affect the intensity variable. For example, let's say you have a pitcher say, JV who can throw a 100 mph fastball. It would be easier for JV to throw 100 fastballs at 90 mph, than 100 fastballs at 98 mph. This doesn't even take into account the different stresses of throwing off speed and breaking pitches.
Another example. Lets say you can lift a 100 pound weight and press it over your head for 1 time. Hence your 1 rep max is 100 pounds. Now lets say you lift 80 pounds 2 times, stop and rest for 2 minutes, and repeat this for 4 more sets. That is 80 pounds for 5 sets of 2. Now lets say you lift the 100 pounds for 10 sets of 1. In both cases, you would be lifting a weight 10 times. However, everyone and anyone would say that you would be working much harder in the 2nd (100 pounds) case.
Regulating volume (pitches) without making any attempt to regulate intensity is misguided.
by rfloh on Nov 1, 2006 11:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bah. I can't type
Regulating pitch counts only regulates the volume of a pitcher's workload.
Regulating volume (pitches) without making any attempt to regulate intensity is misguided. should be
Regulating volume (# of pitches) without making any attempt to regulate intensity is misguided.
by rfloh on Nov 1, 2006 11:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
An interesting distinction
I guess the question is whether or not those who throw pitches with abandon (such as MLB pitchers of old, or these Japanese pitchers) rarely throw max effort, and that's why they're able to do it.
by jeepers on Nov 1, 2006 4:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Going into the final beween Tanaka's
I'm surprised the writer focused on Tanaka, instead of Saitoh, especially given the team Saitoh played for.
by rfloh on Nov 1, 2006 10:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's exactly what I was going to point out
Also, what they're not mentioning is that the 15-inning classic was a TIED GAME and that the two teams had to replay it from the start the next day. (I know, because I actually watched it.) Saitoh pitched complete-game victories in all of those. That kid is nuts.
by Deanna on Nov 1, 2006 4:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
America's getting soft, patron
by monkeyball on Nov 1, 2006 11:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lol!
by GreenSocks on Nov 1, 2006 4:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Mulder interested in Angelos' wallet.
The article contains conflicting views on when Mulder will be ready to pitch:
"They told me, worst-case situation, he'd be 100 percent in 5 1/2 months," Clifton said. "Ten to 11 months was never uttered."
Clifton's estimate puts Mulder's return right around the start of spring training.
by jeepers on Nov 1, 2006 11:41 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
From BCB, the SB nation ROY
by rfloh on Nov 1, 2006 11:43 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Esteban German???
by JLaff on Nov 1, 2006 1:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Mota suspended
by salb918 on Nov 1, 2006 11:45 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
No more mota for Mota.
by jeepers on Nov 1, 2006 11:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
<snerk>
by monkeyball on Nov 1, 2006 11:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
To add the serious answer
First offense: 15 to 30-day suspension or up to a $10,000 fine
Second offense: 30 to 90-day suspension or up to $50,000 fine
Third offense: One year suspension or up to $100,000 fine
Fourth offense: Two year suspension
Any subsequent offense(s): The level of the discipline will be determined by the Office of the Commissioner, consistent with the concept of progressive discipline.
Participation in sale of prohibited substances:
First offense: 60 to 90-day suspension and up to a $100,000 fine
Second offense: Two-year suspension
Any subsequent offense: The level of the discipline will be determined by the Office of the Commissioner, consistent with the concept of progressive discipline.
(link)
by jeepers on Nov 1, 2006 11:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So only steroids are prohibited?
by rfloh on Nov 1, 2006 11:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, I didn't make that clear.
Steroids are also a different category with different (stronger) penalties: 50 games for first violation, 100 games for the second, and a lifetime ban for the third.
by jeepers on Nov 1, 2006 12:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
reasonable cause
by monkeyball on Nov 1, 2006 12:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
video
by xbhaskarx on Nov 1, 2006 1:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Tell me you people have seen this...
by whiteshoes40 on Nov 1, 2006 5:06 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Did we go back in time?
by FormerHuntsvilleStar on Nov 1, 2006 5:13 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
<switches DLD metric back to 'corn dogs'>
by monkeyball on Nov 1, 2006 5:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
OT- Did anyone just see Lost?
<sob>
by Jennifer on Nov 1, 2006 7:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Lost?
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Nov 1, 2006 7:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
God that makes me mad
by vignette17 on Nov 1, 2006 10:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ignore everything I'm saying to you.
by Poppy on Nov 2, 2006 7:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i disagree
by xbhaskarx on Nov 2, 2006 8:16 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Please explain.
by Jennifer on Nov 2, 2006 8:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
what do i take out of that to make it work?
by xbhaskarx on Nov 2, 2006 8:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nothing.
by Poppy on Nov 2, 2006 8:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
okay
i guess it's possible that she's trying to trick him, but that would just be dumb.
what would be the point? it's just too easy.
on one side you have gale, who was involved in killing like three of his friends, has pretty much been a jerk the whole time, has lied, and seems to be in charge (and therefore responsible).
on the other side you have juliet, who has been nice to him, brings him food, and seems to be his only hope for eventual freedom.
obviously jack would side with her over him, i'm sure the others realize that. and even if they wanted to test his loyalty, i doubt they'd do it while he's performing a serious surgical procedure. also, they (aside from juliet) haven't really done much to expect any loyalty from him. what would be the point? they could just go in there and shoot him whenever they want.
i guess it's possible that juliet is trying to trick him but gale isn't in on it, but then how is it a trick?
i think jack is going to perform the operation and not try to kill gale (b/c of the whole doctor thing). i'm sure it'll be successful because it's lost and he's jack. i think juliet will switch sides and help them escape, but she'll probably die soon after because she can't reveal too much about what's really going on.
by xbhaskarx on Nov 2, 2006 9:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What I think...
by Poppy on Nov 2, 2006 9:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So...
I thought she might be trying to convince Jack to kill Ben so she could have Ben out of the way (she would then be the leader, I guess) and be able to tell the other Others that she didn't kill him. Her hands are clean, she points the finger at Jack, the Others kill him, and their life will go on with Ben and the Losties out of the way.
Is it possible to have a spoiler within a spoiler?
*Spoiler*
BTW, Entertainment Weekly has an article about Elizabeth Mitchell in the current issue. They say the 7th ep, the first after the break, is a Juliet flashback. The author of the article mentions while he was on set, they were filming a scene in which Juliet shoots someone... "Cameras rolling, she expertly wields a Sig Sauer and pumps two bullets into someone shocking; the still-standing are left gasping as she coldly lowers the gun."
by Jennifer on Nov 2, 2006 9:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
but...
by ArakSOT on Nov 2, 2006 9:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That could take years.
by Jennifer on Nov 2, 2006 10:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
without an operation?
by xbhaskarx on Nov 2, 2006 11:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't really know.
by Jennifer on Nov 2, 2006 11:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i was just assuming
i'm still sticking by my previous post.
as far as theh entertainment weekly thing: i really doubt it's jack. is that what you were thinking?
what if this person wasn't aware of juliet's plan from this week's episode, so the "someone shocking" is ben/gale or another one of the others?
if she's getting flashbacks, i think that supports the idea of her joining up with the losties. the bearded guy and gale didn't get flashbacks...
also, what kind of sig are we talking here? 220? 226?
by xbhaskarx on Nov 2, 2006 10:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: your first point
But what if Ben is just fucking with Jack and Ben actually had Juliet play that tape? Like a mind game.
And why would Juliet need to join up with the Losties?
The EW thing: Jack that gets shot? I don't think so either. The article mentioned Kate, Sawyer, Juliet, and some Others as being in the scene. It's possible she shoot Ben.
<sigh>
My head is going to explode.
by Jennifer on Nov 2, 2006 11:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
All right, but
btw, I think it's a test of Jack, but am not sure if Ben and Juliet are working together on it
by ArakSOT on Nov 2, 2006 11:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Because the show is *that* awesome.
by Jennifer on Nov 2, 2006 12:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
because
i don't get this test theory.
are we talking about the others testing his loyalty? because as i said above, i think they have no reason to imagine that he could possibly be loyal to gale over juliet.
all this would test would be his loyalty to his own doctorness, and i really can't see him killing a patient on purpose during an operation either way.
by xbhaskarx on Nov 2, 2006 12:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I must have stumbled into the wrong thread.
by Jennifer on Nov 2, 2006 12:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I dunno
by ArakSOT on Nov 2, 2006 12:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
but he's not acting as a doctor then
by xbhaskarx on Nov 2, 2006 12:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
need / want
- she's sick of all the stuff they've been doing
- she's in love with jack
i say she shoots ben, while helping kate/sawyer/jack escape.
by xbhaskarx on Nov 2, 2006 12:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
whoa
by xbhaskarx on Nov 2, 2006 12:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I hate all of you guys.
by salb918 on Nov 2, 2006 12:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Best Article of the offseason
http://firejoemorgan.blogspot.com/2006/11/lets-heat-this-stove-up.html
by OaktownIn06 on Nov 1, 2006 8:21 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
BB & the A's are interested in Japan's F.A.s
Macha had some experience in Japan and the A's may see some market advantages with such players, or recognize superior play in areas such as defense? footwork? accuracy? Speed? Longevity? work habits? other advantages at certain positions? (Speculating here folks).
Having "In House" current knowledge may appeal to the A's since a certain amount of continuity can be expected with all other coaches returning.
Then again there is the simple possibilty the A's owners are interested in researching of doing some business in Japan?
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/11/01/sports/s134952S07.DTL
A few excerpts:
Hillman last week led the Fighters to their first Japan Series title since 1962, completing his second two-year contract with the club. Hillman left a job as Texas' director of player development for Japan just before the Rangers fired former manager Jerry Narron and hired Buck Showalter after the 2002 season.
Before his year in the Rangers organization, Hillman spent 12 seasons as a minor league manager in the New York Yankees organization.
Oakland would have only a seven-day window after interviews to negotiate with any of the candidates already under contract with other clubs.
by A s Eh on Nov 1, 2006 9:10 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















