Who should replace Mark Ellis on playoff Roster?
The A's recently acknowledged that they are working out three players to take over sigh injured Mark Ellis.
Could Keith Be Un-Ginterized?
According to the SF Chronicle:
The A's are investigating the possibility of adding Keith Ginter to the ALCS roster to replace the injured Mark Ellis even though the infielder declared free agency after the minor-league season was over. Both the players' union and the commissioner's office have given Oakland the go-ahead to do so if Ginter receives a 2007 contract.
Ginter, who made $1 million while spending the entire season at Triple-A Sacramento, said he was told this situation never has arisen before. He'll report to the A's Papago Park complex today and hit in an instructional league game while waiting to see what the team decides. He hasn't played in the big leagues since the A's called him up in September 2005.
"I said if they want me, I'm ready,'' Ginter said by phone. "It would be crazy, but I'd be all for it. It's kind of funny how things work out.''
Minor-leaguers Mark Kiger and Kevin Melillo remain possibilities; the A's are working them out in Phoenix, too.
0 recs |
11 comments
Comments
prbly ginter
by jasonlbe on Oct 7, 2006 1:16 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Kiger = Moneyball
I think they'll take Kiger.
by Dann on Oct 9, 2006 2:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Questions
The other question is do the A's have to add him to the 40 man roster to have him play in the ALCS? I mean, one of the reasons that they never called him up during the season was that they did not want to lose a prospect off the 40 man roster.
by Larry E on Oct 7, 2006 6:46 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Didn't Crosby say he'd be ready by the ALCS
by enz on Oct 7, 2006 7:54 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Crosby won't be ready
by alamedagirl on Oct 7, 2006 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This cannot be posted enough....
by GreenNGoldSooner on Oct 7, 2006 8:52 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If Ginter signs
by matthias on Oct 7, 2006 9:06 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't see signing Ginter for '07
by boilerdan on Oct 7, 2006 10:17 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think he'd be a good PH
by gdub171 on Oct 7, 2006 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's an interesting negotiating situation
But right now, due to our lack of alternatives, he's our best option for 2B, even as a backup. He knows that, and it gives him some leverage. Maybe he could try to use it to wangle that major-league contract he wants. On the other hand, is he really going to negotiate himself out of a good shot at the World Series? That's Beane's leverage, and they both know that, too.
I think both sides want to get a deal done, and so they will. With Ellis and Chavez on the team, Ginter has no realistic chance of being a starter in Oakland in 2007. That's a dead end for him and he and Beane both know it. On the other hand, there's no harm in pretending, so long as it can be gotten out of during the off-season. Beane wouldn't object to signing Ginter to a major-league contract in order to have him be backup 2B in the playoffs right now; all he cares about is (1) how easily the contract can be traded, and (2) how much salary he'd have to eat if he has to walk away from it.
The result, I predict, is Ginter gets a modest one-year contract, with the provision that he becomes a free agent if he doesn't make the big-league roster. Then some time next spring that contract is quietly traded.
As for playing time. I think Jimenez is still officially the starter, but I think Ginter could get a start, too. If he looks good, he can earn his spot for the next game. (As an added bonus, if Ginter looks good in the playoffs, that enhances his tradeability.)
by iglew on Oct 7, 2006 10:59 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
ginter has nothing to lose and everything to gain
I'd have to think they could come to some kind of agreement like Major league minimum for 2007 with mutual buyout for $100K. (and the oral agreement that his agent is free to shop him around. He could end up picking up over $200,000 counting playoff shares and bonuses for a couple weeks of work, and get his name back on the radar, plus, it would be fun!
by connie mack on Oct 7, 2006 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















