It's not okay
I'm not okay with the green and gold going out like this. I don't feel good, as a fan, saying, "Well, we made it this far." This is funny, too, because just a few days ago, reading Blez's struggles about trying to be okay with the A's getting this far and everything else being gravy, I thought, yeah, maybe it is gravy.
Not anymore.
Today, watching the masterful performance by Kenny Rogers -- and much as I hate to give it up to him, the Gambler was dealing -- I felt an ugly reminder of 16 years ago when the then-balleyhooed A's took on the Reds and just got dismantled in the World Series. It was beyond nauseating -- and not just because I drank myself into a stupor. It felt alien, detatched -- almost like, "who is this team I'm watching out there? This can't be my guys" -- the swaggering, cool, confident-no-matter-what kids from Oaktown were reduced to almost a non-factor. The Reds didn't make them look bad so much as they made them look like they were insignificant. Just like these guys -- they Tigers just seem to have "IT" while the A's are quickly and, without much comment, fading away.
Now this year's squad has nowhere near the cool the club of 1990 did. They were rockstars. These guys are the undercard -- scrappy, fun to watch, some serious talent, but nothing glamorous. And yet, somehow, they've gotten it done. Not only did they get it done against the Twins -- they dismantled them. Maybe that's it. Maybe that's why I'm where I am today. There was a huge leap from contentment to expectation with that sweep.
And now, in the hangover haze of game three -- thankfully sans the alcohol this time -- I feel miserable again. 16 years older -- and at least a few years wiser, I hope -- I do believe the A's can take the rest of this series game by game and...well, if they do that there's no need to even worry about winning or losing. Just play game four the way your supposed to. So you've lost three in a row. You won three in a row before this in what were considerably tougher conditions when taken at face value. Will the A's take game four at face value? I hope so.
Because "there's always next year "or "they played well this year and got the first-round monkey off their back" be damned. I'm really not okay with them going out in four. This is a special opportunity. Lay it all out in game four. No need for special lineup changes or anything else. We know who our guys are. Here's to hoping they remember who they are and play like it in game four.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great post.......
LET'S GO OAKLAND!!
by A s Fan In Training on Oct 13, 2006 5:32 PM PDT reply actions
It's not over till its over, but
Think about this: Would you rather they go out like this, or go out the way the Angels did last year?
by Flyin As on Oct 13, 2006 7:55 PM PDT reply actions
The anti-Chavez commentary
This feels like a terrific opportunity that we've just pissed away.
If this were a football--well, it would be the Tampa Bay-Oakland Super Bowl. I'm a huge Raider fan, too, and this (over a three-game span) is exactly how I felt back then.
Tears of joy following the previous playoff victories that had at long last arrived. And then utter horror at what followed. This has been absolutely horrible so far. Three disastrous games in every way.
There has been one single good stretch: the first three innings of Game 2, capped by the Bradley homer.
Everything else has been a nightmare.
As to coming back
I do think that Boston coming back from three down has made it possible for other teams to do so. Psychologically, teams can't help but cast it in down 3-0. But after Boston, I think that's not as likely.
So, let's win tomorrow and go from there. If we get it, we'll get to Robertson in Game 5. Then, we'll be home and who knows--the Tigers will definitely be reeling.
I Sincerely Believed that 1990 Team ...
Literally up until the last out, I thought we were going to come back.
I think they were, by far, the best of all the A's teams I've rooted for.

by 























