MVE
The A's now have a most valuable Ellis. Yes, this thread is absolutely, positively dedicated to Mark Ellis, the A's unquestioned MVP at this point.
The guy was hitting .437 and has a 1.142 OPS in September going into the game tonight and once again he came through when Nick Swisher and Marco Scutaro couldn't do the job. Granted Swisher got called out on a ball that was way outside. But if Liriano gets out of that jam, perhaps we see a different result tonight.
Ellis' OPS has gone on an impressive trajectory every month this year...check it out:
April: .651
May: .725
June: .807
July: .855
August: .934
September: 1.142
If this continues, Ellis will be hitting like Bonds in October. I'm just kidding of course, but this couldn't have happened to a better guy or a guy that works any harder. So, stop for a moment tonight and be thankful for the presence of Mark Ellis this September night. A guy whose career seemed in jeopardy last year is now leading the A's offensive charge toward a postseason birth. I know Joe Blanton sure is.
Speaking of Cupcakes, he has the best ERA is the American League since June 1st. No small feat for a guy who many wanted to see back in the minors after May. He also finally reached the .500 mark. I'll be the first to say that my big worry was about Blanton pitching too much. Well, Big Joe is sticking that one right in my face as he just continues to excel in the midst of a pennant race.
FYI, I'm heading out to the game tomorrow, so I'll be opening some threads in advance for your commenting pleasure before I leave early in the A.M.
107 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If
I mean the Angels only managed two runs of Juan F'in Dominguez
by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Sep 20, 2005 10:41 PM PDT reply actions
i'm happy
by Beanemyhero33 on Sep 20, 2005 10:42 PM PDT reply actions
With each passing day,
I (heart) number-crunching
In the 7 against non-Anaheim teams, their magic number is ...
14 if they win 0 of 4 (practically impossible; they'd have to win all 7 while Angels lost 7 of 8)
12 if they win 1 of 4
10 if they win 2 of 4
8 if they win 3 of 4
6 if they win 4 of 4
by rubin sierra on Sep 21, 2005 12:46 AM PDT up reply actions
By the way...
I know nothing good happens when Kennedy is on the mound, but he is DUE. And this is a MUST-WIN. None of us wants to wait all day to root the Angels on to defeat, since they play way later tomorrow. It'd be nice to have a big old "A's Win - FINAL" up on their scoreboard when they are taking batting practice and trying to warm up to face a held-in-check-but-not-for-long Ranger's offense.
Congrats to EVERYONE tonight. Blanton, you're a stud, glad you are at .500! Ellis, wow, can't say ANYTHING, thank you; you're awesome! Swish, nice to see you back! Kendall you too! Witasick was just awesome; way to slam the door with zero drama.
Gather everything you have boys, storm the field tomorrow and keep it coming! WE NEED THE SWEEP!
Witasick
re
by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Sep 20, 2005 10:52 PM PDT up reply actions
oops...was talking about the 9th
by baseballgirl on Sep 20, 2005 10:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Getting Witasick Back On Track An Imperative
The A's can't run Calero out as a set-up guy in every instance and if Witasick pitch as he did tonight, it would help compensate for any games The Duke couldn't appear in as the A's head down the stretch...
by reztips on Sep 20, 2005 10:54 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh, early prediction:
Another prediction
that's a strech;
When they get to...
but...
i should capitalize correctly. too tired. yawn.
Kendall
by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Sep 20, 2005 11:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Is holding his breath....
I thought he had one for a minute
by rubin sierra on Sep 21, 2005 12:58 AM PDT up reply actions
A bear trashed your wall?
What kind of a wall?
Oh, excuse me, you already answered that.
Your car fell off a cliff?
by rubin sierra on Sep 21, 2005 2:51 AM PDT up reply actions
i was there
by Brian in 317 on Sep 21, 2005 7:38 AM PDT up reply actions
Range and FP
by Dig the Long Ball on Sep 20, 2005 10:45 PM PDT reply actions
Ellis is a refreshing sight....
Great Questions for Our Age
by Checkswing HR on Sep 20, 2005 10:52 PM PDT reply actions
My Nominee for Most Annoying AN Feature
by GreenNGoldSooner on Sep 21, 2005 12:11 AM PDT up reply actions
yeah Ellis is just a real good story
awesome.
by rickeytime on Sep 20, 2005 10:53 PM PDT reply actions
Blue collar indeed
All-Humble Squad
2B: Mark Ellis
SS: Cal Ripken
3B: Matt Williams/Scott Rolen
LF: Joe Carter
CF: Torii Hunter
RF: Larry Walker
C: Jason Varitek
DH: Harold Baines
SP: Greg Maddux
RP: Robb Nen/Huston Street
by southofcruiseamerica on Sep 20, 2005 11:11 PM PDT up reply actions
You forgot...
RB: Wendell Tyler
Oh! I thought you said the All-FUMBLE Squad!
What about Dave Krieg and Warren Moon?
by southofcruiseamerica on Sep 20, 2005 11:20 PM PDT up reply actions
I call your Krieg and Moon and raise you...
Jason Varitek??
by OaktownTribesman on Sep 21, 2005 5:52 AM PDT up reply actions
You are sticking up for A-Rod?
Do you like A-Rod's face or something? You mention it as opposed to in the ribs, stomach or kidneys.
by southofcruiseamerica on Sep 21, 2005 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions
Garret Anderson
by Brian in 317 on Sep 21, 2005 7:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Also:
by Checkswing HR on Sep 21, 2005 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions
Too Lazy...
by southofcruiseamerica on Sep 21, 2005 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions
what is shocking is that
Ellis is thriving in the leadoff position, he loves it and so does AN.
Like you Blez, I really thought Cupcakes would hit a wall, some wall! I know he won't even get a vote for rookie of the year, he doesn't have enough wins and they will ignore the 7 games he pitched where the A's were shut out, and they will ignore the ERA numbers since June, but why do I keep looking at him and thinking Catfish?
Same bulky build, well, Cupcakes has a few more layers than Catfish did, but Catfish didn't walk many guys, didn't strike out many guys, but the wins kept piling up, guys making outs all the time.
I think of all the rookies he surprises me the most. I thought Street would be great, I listened to him talk about pressure and knew he had the "right stuff". Swisher is doing what we thought, not a great average but some power, I was high on DJ, good discipline, and someday he will hit for more power. But Cupcakes, not a stirling record in Sacramento, a little inconsistent, not many K's, few walks. I was hoping he would win half his games, and he has but he has deserved much better than he has gotten.
I read today that Macha said he will pitch Zito on 3 days if a playoff is needed. To be honest, in any big game right now I would prefer Blanton on the mound.
by china bob on Sep 20, 2005 10:57 PM PDT reply actions
what!!!??? 3 days rest. That is crazy.
I read it in today's Sac Bee
Here it is:
With an off day Thursday, Macha will tweak the rotation and have Zito start Saturday to him to pitch the finale of the Los Angeles Angels series Sept. 29.
In the event of a one-game playoff Oct. 3, Macha said Zito will pitch on three days' rest.
http://www.sacbee.com/content/sports/baseball/oak_athletics/story/13593420p-14434220c.html
thank you for this. I guess my initial reaction
that is insane
zito on three days rest
Well
by rookieoftheyear on Sep 20, 2005 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Go with Danny
by dylantravis on Sep 20, 2005 11:28 PM PDT up reply actions
I'd go with Yabu and Cruz
I'd pitch Ginter
haren's streak
Joe B has been the stopper lately
A Point A National writer made
Is that the healthy Mark Ellis of 2003 wasn't particularly good. so what is he coming back from?
The perfect comeback scenario is great/horrible/great again.
By that rationale, the winner is pretty obvious, much as we might not like it:
Benedict.
He is coming back from a way too close
by southofcruiseamerica on Sep 20, 2005 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions
That is the stupidest thing I've ever heard
p.s. Why doesn't ellis have a sign in the bleachers?
i agree with you about the popularity contest
You have to comeback from something. he wasn't a particularly good hitter in 2003-- pre-injury.
I just don't get that logic
thank you, gojohn10
But absolutely Ellis should be eligible--any non-rookie who emerges in a big way can be, and an injury like Ellis' is absolutely the type of thing which, if overcome, should be rewarded here.
What you're right about, oaktoon, is that Giambi's probably going to win. If only because apparently he's already been nominated and Ellis was passed over, and also because as you pointed out, he was really good in 03, and his lousy dropoff in 04 does constitute adversity almost as difficult as a career-threatening injury. Then throw in the fact that Giambi actually did experience a career-threatening injury in '04, and he's a legitimate candidate.
by rubin sierra on Sep 21, 2005 3:02 AM PDT up reply actions
What About...
I somewhat agree
by OaktownTribesman on Sep 21, 2005 5:56 AM PDT up reply actions
Ellis had a sign
That'll get you booted out of Disneyland too, as I understand it. Though It's A Small World will never again seem so poignant.
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Sep 21, 2005 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions
your nominees for Three Stars of the Night...?
Baby Winexp:
Sep 20, 2005 OAK Jason Kendall +0.224 4
Sep 20, 2005 OAK Mark Ellis +0.163 6
Sep 20, 2005 OAK Joe Blanton* +0.161 25
I gotta admit, Kendall had a heck of a night. He's had such a bad year that it's hard for me to notice his contributions when they come. Baby Winexp hates Kendall in general, but she had to give him his due. She looooves Ellis and thinks he's the MVP of Sept for the A's. But so does everyone.
Here's her top four A's of a crummy September.
OAK Mark Ellis +1.115 89
OAK Nick Swisher +0.694 67
OAK Huston Street* +0.601 45
OAK Kirk Saarloos* +0.506 82
for context, Baby Winexp's best in the majors for Sept:
BOS David Ortiz 1.916 83
ATL Chipper Jones 1.801 74
TEX Mark Teixeira 1.782 79
FLA Carlos Delgado 1.51 80
I don't quite get Baby Winexp's obsession with Chipper Jones, but I don't follow the NL too closely either. She's just looooved him all year.
Could it be true?
Couldn't agree more about Ellis! I've always
Could the infield hit 110+ home runs next year? I think they might. (of course the dreaded no injury assumption)
"no injury assumption"
by baseballgirl on Sep 20, 2005 11:18 PM PDT up reply actions
yeah, I know. That's why I said
No...
Ellis will have about 12;
Crosby 20-25
Chavez around 30
DJ at 20-25
best case would be 90 or so. 80-85 is more likely.
don't you think that Crosby, DJ, and
We've discovered his secret!
And he's staying INSIDE the ball!
The Ship is Finally Righted
would like to see DJ and hatty step up a notch, of course, and Chavez close strong, but overall the bats are reawakening, the starting pitching is solid every night, and I think they're primed for a 7-4 or 8-3 run to the wire that just might put them into the postseason.
Only down side of Ellis is the financial piece. he is arbitration eligible-- i would think the A's are gonna have to pay him at least 10-12 million for 3 years (and maybe more), which further reduces the payroll flexibility for Zito and another free agent bat.
Well, it'll probably only take one loss...
Tomorrow's Game
Hope to see you at the game tomorrow, Blez. I will be in Section 126, Row 1, Seat 6.
with an OPS
there is no way that Ellis signs for less than 3 million a year. It'll be closer to 5-- easy.
Not really
by OaktownTribesman on Sep 21, 2005 6:01 AM PDT up reply actions
Ignored the Rain; Enjoyed the Game
Did anyone else see Swisher when he ran past first in his first AB? One step past the bag he put both hands down to his "Groinal Area." Not so much a grab as a push. I'm guessing (Hoping!) it was just a little tightness caused by a hard run with little warmup due to the wet field. I held my breath for a minute though.
I'm a big fan of Scoots, but an error and a base-running mistake? hmmmm. But that DP he started in the 6th was a real rally-killer. Great Play.
Chavy would definately be on my all-humble team. Quiet night at bat but that pick he made of a hot liner just off the dirt was beautiful. And timely, too.
Nice to see Witasick back out there. Shakey, but infinitely better than last night.
All around sweet game. Sure missed Roy Steele. :-(
by NomAd on Sep 21, 2005 12:08 AM PDT reply actions
Forgot one comment...
by NomAd on Sep 21, 2005 12:10 AM PDT up reply actions
Did anyone else notice
by jb on Sep 21, 2005 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions
Yep, both him and Chavez
Blez
Dear AN,
So when Ellis' line drive evaded the reach of the Twinkies' second basemen, the relief was such that I actually jumped up and cried out "Yes!" with both arms in the air, causing my parents to look at me with concern, perhaps thinking that I should be either on more or less medication.
Have been putting off studying for going on two hours ... Good night!
Here's the article . . .
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2002/07/23/SP206475.DTL&type=printable
Dakota
Nice to see the Dick Green name drop. You and I are in the minority of fans who remember him. His defense in the '74 series was nothing short of BRILLIANT. Catfish Hunter said if he'd managed one hit in the series (he was 0-13), he would have been named MVP.
Thanks for the post (great story!) and link: can't wait to read it.
by Brian in 317 on Sep 21, 2005 7:59 AM PDT up reply actions
Harden-- not starting?
I mean, he is dirty regardless and will help the A's tremendously when he gets back, but 1) what is the AN reaction to this? and 2) what sort of role will he play in the bullpen?
I'll take any Harden I can get
A loophole!
"Ellis will finish about 10 to 12 plate appearances shy of the minimum 502 needed to qualify, but the missing plate appearances could be applied to his total as hitless at-bats (e.g., an 0-for-10 could be added). If the resulting lower average still led the league, the batting title would be his."
To those saying Haren
- Zito on 3-days rest
- Saarloos
- Kennedy
- Harden (perhaps not having pitched anywhere for over a month)
Yahoo Sports on both Monday and Tuesday bashed
No one realistic can claim that Oakland is a viable MLB venue, something I'm certain is clear to Mr. Wolff (who was in attendance for both nights). And no excuse about the lack of a new stadium--this exciting young team is smack dab in a pennant raise, yet the fans are MIA...
by reztips on Sep 21, 2005 8:35 AM PDT reply actions
But that's been true for most of 35 years...
< *Redundancy Alert* >
by kcfries on Sep 21, 2005 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions
kcfries, if you don't like my posts is it all that
BTW, this is a question raised on most of the A's sites and again, if it seems redundant to you or is not of interest, please don't bother to read it. That's not so hard, is it?
by reztips on Sep 21, 2005 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions
Look dude.
Your posts about baseball are pretty thoughtful.
Your posts about Oakland are insulting. People respond when they're insulted. What's so hard about that for YOU to understand?
You post a lot. Many of your posts deride many of our hometown. Personally, I think you're looking for attention with it. And it's so old it stinks. Get out from in front of your computer and go outside every now and then. The graphics are incredible.
by 66th Hegenberger on Sep 21, 2005 5:01 PM PDT up reply actions
dude,
Re: Dude
God, my signature line is so old I had to think about your post for a while before I understood it.
No, I've been an EOS (enemy of Stomper) since he debuted. I'm not sure why, really... Maybe he's just too cute.
My wife, knowing this full well, has Stomper hug me whenever he's around. His fur feels like a dirty fraternity carpet.
by 66th Hegenberger on Sep 22, 2005 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Baltimore's Owner Objected Till Paid Off
Look for the same scenario to ultimately happen in the Bay Area, as Wolff--unable to find reasonably expeditious help from either local pols or business owners in the sector encompassing the proposed new stadium--looks for a viable new venue in either San Jose, or barring that, Sacto.
At least those of us who want the A's to stay in the region had better hope the above reaches fruition, because the team sure as hell isn't going to remain in Oakland.
A grand total of 33,000 fans for two important, playoff relevant games this late in the year--PATHETIC!
by reztips on Sep 21, 2005 9:36 AM PDT reply actions
yeah, but
by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Sep 21, 2005 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions
alien, what would be your choice? To keep the A's
by reztips on Sep 21, 2005 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions
well
The thing is, I don't necessarily agree with you that they have to move out of Oakland. If, and I recognize its a big if, they can get a new ballpark in Oakland, I think they'll be just as well off as if they got a new park in San Jose or Fremont. I think people would come. All things being equal, I would like them to stay where they are.
However, they absolutely need a new park. If they can't get one in Oakland, then they have to move. But I don't think giving a king's ransom in concessions to the Giants is the way to do it.
by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Sep 21, 2005 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions
Thanks for not answering the questions...
Clearly, unlike alien, you didn't read my post...
by reztips on Sep 21, 2005 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions
What a game
by doublehustle22 on Sep 21, 2005 12:02 PM PDT reply actions

by 
























