FREE DARIC BARTON #2
by blee1134 on Aug 22, 2005 8:37 PM PDT
35 comments
with so many posts in the first thread some opinions get lost. Here is mine:
What people need to understand, is that there is no difference mentally for a rookie coming up now as opposed to the start of the year. If anything, it's harder for a rookie to start the year because if he struggles he has to go back 6 months since his last success. If Barton were to come up and struggle he would only have to go back 2 weeks to go "oh yeah, I was pretty good". I understand that guys up the whole season have more of a chance to play off struggles but at most that simply evens out the first thing I said.
The A's let their rookies and youngsters struggle. Swisher did. Blanton did. Haren did. Crosby did. Harden did. Mulder did. Tejada did.
I'm sure the A's trust their rookies to know that struggles are simply a part of the game. The trust their rookies to know that the A's will stick with them through thick and thin (the rare Jose Ortiz aside).
Barton SHOULD BE ON THE A'S RIGHT NOW. Why? Because he would be an upgrade over what they had now. To whoever said the thing about the A's DH's right now combining for a .800 OPS...Well, if they could, then stick with them. The problem? They CANNOT put up an OPS of .800. They haven't to date and they wont from this point.
Barton being up will help the A's in their quest for the playoffs and he'll help in the playoffs if they make it. And he'd play for the league minimum with no effect on his arbitration years. Barton not being up is stupid. End of story.
0 recs |
35 comments
Email
Print
Comments
Guess this answers the question
by gatling on Aug 22, 2005 8:53 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
"Barton not being up is stupid."
I don't know if Daric is ready or not, and I don't know if this is a good idea or not, HEY he's the Player we got for one of the big 3, of course Billy wants him in the team like we do, but If Barton is not with the team right now I'm pretty sure that Billy has a reason...
by Olijerez77 on Aug 22, 2005 8:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Well "In Billy, I wonder"
When head-trainer Larry Davis and the .600 OPS'ing DH both say that this injury is going to take a while to heal, that should be a huge red flag that he is not going to be productive by having a few days of rest.
The DL was never an option for Hatty TWO WEEKS ago, and apparently it isn't one now.
So I ask you and the rest of AN, what excuse, if ANY could Beane give that would explain why he is keeping Hatteberg in this season's plans?
by Genaro on Aug 22, 2005 9:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The Hatte ...
I don't even want to get into this. I'm all in favor of call-ups. And if DB gets the call, he'll most definitely get the at-bats. But Billy knows when to bring someone up better than anyone in the majors.
He has personal experience. Too soon is about the worst thing one can do to a player.
Read the book.
And if you have, think about it. Yanks almost destroyed The Mick. Came up so fast. Of course 18 years old is TOO fast. But still, when the sent him to the bush league, he was so frustrated, he almost ended his career.
Barton is no fink. (Couldn't resist that.) And will probably be a part of our great future. But right now ...
give us Hatteberg. He's proven he's clutch. He's proven he's the man.
by Edwinwinwin on Aug 22, 2005 10:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sorry
A player that had some pop in his bat. A player that some idea what to do at the plate.
This hatteberg's not the same.
Again, the reason beane didn;t do anything up until now is that he had a team that was winning until 10 days ago.
the facts on the ground have changed. the team's no longer winning. Hatteberg;s no longer hitting. Kendall and Kotsay are showing no signs of coming out of protracted slumps.
The interesting thing is that the only possible explanation for beane not moving Barton up now-- as opposed to 9 days from now-- is that he may believe this team is unlikely to make the playoffs period. If he thinks they are likely to finish 4-5 games behind the Angels-- and that they can't outlast both the yankee offense and the indian schedule advantage, he may simply decide that discression is the better option.
I don't think he thinks that, but OTOH, i can't entirely rule it out. But the Billy Beane that lives and dies with this team like we do, and is one of the most competitive people we've all witnessed, cannot assess this situation and conclude that either Scott Hatteberg or Bobby Kielty-- or even adam Melhuse-- is his best option.
I think he knows who his best option is-- so now does he wait for Sept 1, or act tomorrow by either disabling Hatteberg or sending Ginter out?
by oaktoon on Aug 22, 2005 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's the problem Oaktoon
Why is it that we have to suffer right along with Hatty and watch a key cog for the past 3 years go down in flames when it doesn't have to be this way.
Hatteberg is not going to DL himself, nor would he if he could.
by Genaro on Aug 22, 2005 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Somewhat," not "extremely"
But that is currently the only value that Hatteberg brings to the plate.
And that value would be entirely obviated if Hudgens would convince everybody besides Kendall and DJ to take more pitches and control their strike zones and ABs. (No, the current hitting slump is not Hudgens' fault per se; but we're seeing a lot of bad habits cropping back up.)
I'm agnostic on the Barton question; but I'm a fundamentalist zealot on the Hatteberg question.
by monkeyball on Aug 23, 2005 7:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yea
by oscarwdog on Aug 23, 2005 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Almost ...
by Edwinwinwin on Aug 23, 2005 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whoops.
Yes, The Mick did pick himself up and did have a great career.
And you don't need to preach to the choir. I can't WAIT for D. Barton to pick up a bat.
by Edwinwinwin on Aug 23, 2005 8:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
re
Does that mean he doesn't make mistakes? No, of course not.
Would the A's have made the playoffs last season if Street came up? Yeah, probably. Beane didn't bring Street up though and the A's didn't make the playoffs. I still trust Beane, but it was a very costly mistake.
by blee1134 on Aug 22, 2005 9:19 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
re: Hatteberg
by blee1134 on Aug 22, 2005 10:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hatte's not worthless
by Alien on Aug 22, 2005 10:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not fair ...
When he's driving, he gets us there.
And he'll be driving soon.
According to Michael Lewis, if the A's had 9 Hattebergs they would score more runs than any A's team in history.
Granted, this year he's playing in pain; but that's nothing new.
Down the stretch, the final 39, he's an important cog in a well-oil machine.
So let's wait until the roster is expanded before calling up Barton. That's if Billy thinks a 19 year old phenom is ready. If you recall, Beane was a 19 year old phenom. He doesn't want this kid to be hurt, or suffer a set back. You don't run 2 year olds in the Belmont Stakes.
No question about it, Barton can drive the ball to all fields, and has a keen eye and can get on base and will probably get his share of hits. But Hatteberg is the man I trust with two outs in the bottom of the ninth when we need to stay alive; when we need to score a run.
by Edwinwinwin on Aug 22, 2005 10:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was then...
Hatteberg collapsed down the stretch last year.
He's been subpar this year, and horrendous the past couple of weeks.
The Michael lewis quote-- which i think came from beane or someone in the A's front office-- no longer applies.
by oaktoon on Aug 22, 2005 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes and no.....
Should he be the everyday DH instead of a late inning pinch hitter? Will he return to the form of 2002? Probably not in both cases. I just hope we don't loose him as an assett to the organization.
by Duke of left field on Aug 22, 2005 11:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A sweet dilemma.
Upon reading Blez's interview ...
http://www.athleticsnation.com/story/2005/6/8/222713/1039
and studying Barton's stats ...
and even though he's on a 2007 timetable and I would like to see him up here in the bigs for a few weeks this year (it would be sweet) ...
where do we put him?
He plays first and so does DJ ...
uh oh ...
by Edwinwinwin on Aug 22, 2005 10:42 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
DH
by burnone on Aug 23, 2005 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
re
9 CURRENT Hattebergs would get on base 34% of the time with a pathetic .355 SLG and be the lowest scoring team in baseball.
Hatteberg was bad this year before he got hurt and now he's terrible hurt. I don't think he's going to get any better playing every day either. He's worthless to the A's unless it's pinch hitting late in games once a week.
His OPS is now .699 and going the wrong way.
Hatteberg used to be a nice player. Now he's bringing down the team.
by blee1134 on Aug 22, 2005 11:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
all about the future
by novaoakland on Aug 22, 2005 11:09 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Granted.
Compared to his previous OPA's .807 ('02), .725 ('03), .787 ('04) and (presently) .700 (a gave him the benefit of a percentage point).
He's healing. He's resting. He's rehabbing. (Or, in his case, reHatting.)
I admire (and value) his instincts and eye, and his swing (though slightly encumbered) is sweet as ever.
I know opposing pitchers don't think of "number" or "stat" when he's at bat. Because he can STILL do a lot of damage.
Okay, I suppose I'm thoroughly guilty of being a loyal fan (and like a true A's elephant, I don't soon forget), but yet I believe (and so does Beane and Macha and mostly everybody else in that clubhouse) Scott Hatteberg is our Roy Hobbs and we'd be darn foolish to discount him with 39 games to go.
Figures don't lie but liars can figure. Even though his OPA is a hundred points below 2002's, not to mention a hundred or so below Chavvy's .808. And a good deal below Payton's (luscious) .842. Do you think he's LESS clutch?
I know, clutch is a difficult "stat." You don't find it in a computer as easily as you find it in one's heart.
And Hatte has HEART.
End of story. But just the beginning of what I hope turns out to be one hell of an exciting pennant race.
And somehow, somewhere, Hatteberg will make a difference.
by Edwinwinwin on Aug 23, 2005 12:21 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
huh??
Roy Hobbs? Are you serious? Hatty's not hitting as well as Calvin and Hobbes;
"Clutch"?? Sure would have liked to seen a few basehits instead of all those DP balls and weak fly balls the last few weeks in clutch situations;
He can't do a lot of damage. 5 homers all year? No real power now for more than a full season. Sub 700 OPS since last September.
He's already made a difference-- and in the wrong way. Put a league average DH in there and the A's are in much better shape in the pennant race and WC right now.
Yes, he's less clutch. because he's less good.
He ought to be retired right now. He'll have plenty of time to coach then.
by oaktoon on Aug 23, 2005 2:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haha.
Calvin and Hobbs?
A riot.
But he who laughs lasts laughs best.
Now take your eye out of the rear mirror and keep it on the road.
When Hatte gets in that batter's box, he's driving us to a penant.
Sure, his numbers say one thing, but his heart and determination and desire to win speaks far louder.
He'll probably be doing more pinching than DHing, but in any capacity, he will win some games.
by Edwinwinwin on Aug 23, 2005 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another point that hasn't been raised
David Ortiz has been dominant and makes like $7-8 million per year; meanwhile, if you put Barton in RF or at 1B and let him play mediocre defense, his value goes through the roof to $11-12 million at free agency. This is assuming he has a couple .320/.440/.540 seasons in there with 25 bombs and and a gazillion walks.
It's pretty clear to me that Barton should a) be called up right now and b) become the long-term DH or be moved back to catcher, where his mediocre defense would be more than offset by the marginal/incremental improvement his bat would provide over the next best alternative (read: .900 OPS vs. .700 OPS, are you kidding me?).
Best case for Barton, IMO: Bring him up right now and let him DH. Hopefully he's closer to Jeff Francoeur than Nick Swisher April 2005. Then, send him to the Arizona Fall League to catch. Have him catch in Spring Training and start the year in AAA to refine catching skills. Bring him up mid-2006 (and extend his pre-FA time to 2012 over 2011 if you start him in the majors next year) to split time with Kendall at catcher and part-time DH. In 2007, you could trade Kendall (when $5 million comes from Pittsburgh) and let Barton catch full-time or keep the platoon going to spare Barton the physical toll of catching full time.
by NP15 on Aug 23, 2005 6:30 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It's pretty clear that his future is not at C
by boilerdan on Aug 23, 2005 8:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont think Kendall will platoon....
by SanTropez on Aug 23, 2005 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
re: Barton catching
"The A's moved first baseman Daric Barton from Stockton to Midland after Barton tore up the California League, hitting .318 with eight homers. Barton was moved from catcher to first base this year because of arm soreness but the A's still plan to use him as a catcher down the road."
And people bringing up Hatte's value of taking pitches..Now you may or may not have noticed, but he doesn't see that many pitches any more. He swings at more balls and he misses on more swings. Just the other day he had pathetic 3 pitch K with the bases loaded.
Hatteberg is old and he's done. The A's are a better team with him on the bench. With nobody on Hatte will k, with a runner on first he'll gidp.
by blee1134 on Aug 23, 2005 8:50 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hatteberg and pitch-taking
Very interesting side note: Crosby leads the team with 4.17 PPA, which is better than Hatteberg has ever done in any year with 100+ ABs.
by matthias on Aug 23, 2005 9:40 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Roster expansion is in 9 days
by Donner on Aug 23, 2005 10:36 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
did the last 9 days make a difference??
by oaktoon on Aug 23, 2005 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why not wait
by oscarwdog on Aug 23, 2005 1:06 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
re
by blee1134 on Aug 23, 2005 1:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Roster considerations
- When you bring up Barton, you want to be 100% sure he's gonna stay up forever. Otherwise, you start his arbitration clock for no good reason, and you lose a year of his play six years down the line.
- Barton is not currently on the 40-man roster, and I don't think he'll be eligible for the Rule 5 draft this winter. So if you put him on the roster just to make a cameo in September, then that's one less player the A's can protect from the Rule 5 draft in December.
by kenarneson on Aug 23, 2005 2:04 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
okay
The 40 man roster issue would be a problem if the A's seriously thought Barton wouldn't come up to the majors at some point next year. Considering the prospect he is, thats probably not a problem. If he falls of precipitously, thats a whole different issue, and maybe he's not the prospect they thought.
I sort of buy the "he's not ready, it'll stunt his growth" argument--especially where defense is concerned---but it really doesn't seem that the roster/arby issue is even a concern.
by Alien on Aug 23, 2005 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
John Sickels gives his thoughts on the matter
by gatling on Aug 23, 2005 3:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
