Explaining Waivers
I've seen a bunch of questions about waivers, and although I definitely do not think of myself as an expert, I did read an article about them by Steve Phillips over on ESPN.com
Usually, I think the guy is an idiot (heck, look at what he did to the Mets), but this was actually a pretty informative article
http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/story?columnist=phillips_steve&id=2130379
Alas, it is insider only, but here are the relevant bits:
Players can change teams one of three ways on waivers:
- A player is claimed on waivers and the team awarded the claim makes a trade with the other club.
- A player is claimed on waivers and the player's team just decides to dump the claimed player on the claiming team.
- A player clears waivers, meaning that no team claimed him during the 47-hour period, and is later traded to an interested party.
Once a player goes on waivers any team can put in a claim, but the claims are awarded in order of
- League -- American League teams have dibs on AL players before the National League gets 'em and visa-versa
- Record -- When comparing two claims within the same league, the team with the worst record gets dibs.
Gammons had an article about the guys who have cleared waivers. Among the hitters that cleared were: Piazza, Griffey, Sweeney, Frank Catalanotto, Dustan Mohr, Todd Hollandsworth, Todd Walker and Edgardo Alfonzo. Sadly, one of our favorites, Adam Dunn did not clear - so we realistically have no shot at him. For those of you with insider, here's the Gammons article:
http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/gammons/story?id=2135848
One other interesting thing to note - if a team wants to trade anyone on the 40 man roster, that player must clear waivers. So, for some of our AAA guys to be included in a waiver trade, they too would have to clear waivers. (Not bloody likely in the case of someone like Juan Cruz).
0 recs |
4 comments
Comments
Question...
Cuz if its the former then thats sorta stupid cuz any team can just refuse to trade him for anyone once he is claimed and have him clear waivers eventually.
And if its the latter, then its sorta risky, any team can just pick up a free player and refuse to trade anyone good for him.
by WhiteElephantGuy on Aug 18, 2005 12:19 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
according to phillips:
He also says that once a player has been pulled back off of waivers, he cannot be put back on for another 30 days.
by RickeySteals on Aug 18, 2005 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's the latter
It happens all the time.
Of course, if the original team really wanted to rid themselves of a contract, they could just allow the claiming team to have him for nothing and they'd be stuck with the entire contract.
The guys who get through waivers are either:
a. not really worth bothering with
b. players who there is no way in hell will actually get traded (good player with a good contract)
c. players of varying skill levels with bad contracts.
by devo on Aug 18, 2005 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This was a great read.
by sf drift king on Aug 18, 2005 6:15 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















