Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jim Irsay: We Can Make It Work With Peyton Manning

Krueger + 2 Fired

This will hit the AP wire shortly:

http://www.knbr.com/homestory/statement.html

Apparently, earlier this morning, the Morning Show made a comedy act out of Felipe Alou's comments on ESPN's Outside the Lines.  

Bob Agnew, Tony Rhein, and Larry Kreuger are no longer at KNBR effective tomorrow.

Couple of questions:
1- Does Krueger deserve to be fired?
2- Is the comedy act just an excuse for the station to bend to the hopes of other parties that Krueger be fired?
3- Can you ever in your wildest dreams imagine Marty Lurie dragging the team and the fans into such a situation?

Happy to be an A's fan, and glad that we aren't currently embroiled in a similar situation.

Comment 173 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Wow.
I saw Krueger's firing as inevitable, but Bob Agnew too? Agnew must've gone to the mat for Krueger, and he paid the price for it. That's a big shakeup since he's been a fixture there for the last decade or more. Tony Rhein? He's young. He'll bounce back. He must've been collateral damage.

by vertig0 on Aug 9, 2005 11:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Rhein just got married
What a present.  KNBR has no balls.
A Beane in the hand is worth $60M in payroll

by jeepers on Aug 10, 2005 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wow
I don't know about what was said this morning, but I hope they gave Krueger a decent severance.  He made a mistake but ended up getting hosed.  Agnew has been there for a long time too.  I guess Ratto was actually correct and the Giants ended up on top in this one.

by southofcruiseamerica on Aug 9, 2005 11:48 PM PDT reply actions  

Wow
I think Alou wanted Krueger fired even though he said he didn't. He kept the revisiting the issue for the past few days. Yes, Krueger screwed up, he should have known better, but I thought he deserved a second chance since this was a first offence. I guess they added a few more people to the mix to show they meant business. I'll miss listening to Kreuger. He was one of the few things on KNBR I enjoyed listening to. Hopefully, Urban will take his spot.
Celebrate good times, come on!

by gojohn10 on Aug 9, 2005 11:55 PM PDT reply actions  

also
I wonder how much of this was due to the harsh critisism of the Giants team by Kreuger rather than the racial comments. I think they want to have positive vibes emancipating from the airwaves to keep the turnstiles moving.
Celebrate good times, come on!

by gojohn10 on Aug 9, 2005 11:57 PM PDT reply actions  

They don't have a problem
with the turnstiles over there.  Krueger has been critical of them for years.  There is a casue and effect here:  two losses to a horrid Rockies team made him snap, he used the term Caribbean after brain-dead, then Alou quit his KNBR show and called Krueger Satan.  This was going to end badly for someone either way.  The rest of the rant included ownership and baseball operations as well.  Funny thing is that KNBR could survive without the Giants and I am not sure the Giants could survive, at least at the same level, without KNBR.

by southofcruiseamerica on Aug 10, 2005 12:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

Krueger Satan?
Calling Krueger Satan only proves Alou's brain is turning to mush! Could it be ....S A T A N? Go Dana Carvey Go! heheh

by 2xr on Aug 10, 2005 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

re
There was no chance Krueger wasn't getting fired.  Besides just all the internet talk, the story made it to all the sports radio and television talk shows.  Way too much publicity, regardless of any morning zoo stunt.

by 31Boots on Aug 10, 2005 12:04 AM PDT reply actions  

I'm hoping Barbieri is next...
okay, I know, it's wishful thinking.
Rich Harden - Cy Young 2005 & Dan Johnson - ROY 2005!

by FoolshGame22 on Aug 10, 2005 12:05 AM PDT reply actions  

Re: Happy to be an A's fan...
Happy to be an A's fan, and glad that we aren't currently embroiled in a similar situation.

But, I wonder who was the guy with Quaker Oats for brains that put the A's on a friggn' Superstition Station?  ;-)

I'd be happier if the A's had their own radio station, where they could fire those who disagreed with them.  Does that make me not a libertarian?  Nah... private muscle is okay, it's the state that sucks.

Rich Harden - Cy Young 2005 & Dan Johnson - ROY 2005!

by FoolshGame22 on Aug 10, 2005 12:14 AM PDT reply actions  

That's Just B.S...
Yeah, Larry made a really stupid comment. Yeah, it was offensive. It was moronic. Yeah, he should have to spend a week or even a month at home without a paycheck. But come on... this is almost as stupid as Dusty starting Marvin Bernard in center for all those years.

Every host who has supported Larry (not his comment, but the man himself) on the air over the last few days, including Gary, Rick, Rod, and Ralph, should all resign.

by HigherPie on Aug 10, 2005 12:25 AM PDT reply actions  

My thoughts exactly
I can't believe they're pulling this shit after their entire lineup has been unified in its stance:  the comment was stupid, but Larry's a good guy who's been here for years and deserves another chance.  The truth is, I'm scared that Gary will resign, and I'll miss the hell out of him!  I just sent an e-mail to knbr saying as much.  

Gary was so eloquent in his defense of Kruger, saying passionately, "If it happens again, get him the hell out of here!"  But saying that Kruger had been there too long not to have earned a second chance.  I'm scared to listen to Gary today--I think he might have to call in depressed.  Or angry.  What the hell is this world coming to?

"Every time he opens his mouth he makes a fool of himself," La Russa said. "He's a village idiot."

by rubin sierra on Aug 10, 2005 8:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

Gary's defense was lame
You cannot be on the radio for eight years and insult flagship manager with a juvenile "his brain turned to Cream of Wheat."  Forget the "Carribbean"... not an issue.

The other guys were fired because they made up voice parody of Alou saying "Satan" and marrying it to South Park audio.  Too much, I guess.  Don't these guys like high-paying jobs?

Krueger's defense by Radnich was, "Hey, He has a wife and kids, and one on the way."  Guess what, that is a no-no in Human Relations for about 20-30 YEARS... you cannot judge performance by external factors, just like you cannot interview someone for a job and say, "Are you planning on getting pregnant?

Plain and simple, Krueger has "Rome Envy" and thinks blasting people gets fans excited.  That's why I don't listen to Krueger.  Nothin' to say I couldn't hear at a typical bar, plus I might get a free beer for listenin'.

Radnich makes $1 mill a year.  Krueger make maybe a third.  So let him live in Pittsburg.  It's not as if we're sending him to Iraq!

by Ducts on the Pawn on Aug 10, 2005 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I honestly believe this is an over-reaction
I listen to KNBR every once in a while. We're sports nuts, and that's often the only option. Bob Agnew is a good guy. I had meetings with him more than 6 years ago when the company I was with was looking into advertising via the radio. He was often the brunt of jokes on the morning show as the guy upstairs.

Krueger screwed up. But to drag down other colleagues with successful track records is overkill. It's more likely this was the "last straw" after Jon London's "Not Just Sports Show" was such a disaster too - could be other issues in play.

Also - I think Alou's role is not angelic. If Macha hated Extra Innings with Robert Buan and Buan said he was "old", would that raise a call that he was agist, and should lose his job? How persistent would Macha be in his defense?

I have to side with the radio personalities here - what a bunch of media over-reaction hoo ha.

by louismg on Aug 10, 2005 12:26 AM PDT reply actions  

Which makes me wonder if the coach was
hired to sign the son?

What a tangled web...

First Place in the AL West! ...A'smA's-zing!

by A s Eh on Aug 10, 2005 7:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wow...
I guess we know who's in charge, and it's not KNBR.  That's a bloodletting.

Ratto was more correct than I imagined.

Krueger's verbal brainfart left the station in an untenable position.  I have no idea about the morning show, or what they did.  KNBR's Giant cheerleading drives me nuts, but now the station's shaky credibility really takes a hit.  

Who will dare criticize the Giants now?  

And if no one does, because it gets you fired, how will anyone - even Giants fans - take them seriously?

I am surprised that cooler heads didn't prevail.  But it seems the Giants will brook no dissent on their station.  

by bear88 on Aug 10, 2005 12:32 AM PDT reply actions  

Glenn Dickey's thoughts
about Krueger's suspension.  He hasn't posted a story since the firings...

http://www.glenndickey.com/_gd.php?page=current

Regardless, it's an interesting read.

Two-thirds of the earth is covered by water, the other third is covered by Kotsay.

by carp on Aug 10, 2005 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

SF Chron's story...
Read it here."

Why is no one talking about how Felipe has offended millions in the Satan-worshipping community?

by HigherPie on Aug 10, 2005 12:42 AM PDT reply actions  

"This messenger of Satan?"
How could you not parody that?

It probably wasn't a smart move for people wanting to keep their jobs, but still...

Heh.  Radnich says the Giants had nothing to do with the Tuesday Night Massacre.

Like I said above, KNBR has a serious credibility problem.

by bear88 on Aug 10, 2005 12:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

I mean come on...
The messenger of Satan is clearly a Yankee fan.

by HigherPie on Aug 10, 2005 12:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

And, Radnich...
loses all credibility in saying that.
Rich Harden - Cy Young 2005 & Dan Johnson - ROY 2005!

by FoolshGame22 on Aug 10, 2005 12:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

uhhh
I don't think Radnich and credibility have ever met.  Maybe Krueger introduced them once.

by room812 on Aug 10, 2005 1:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yep ...
Alou stated earlier he did not want Krueger to lose his job ... KNBR management stated their intention was not to fire Krueger. I'd say the lack of credibility runs rampant through the whole damn thing ...

Who is the "real" sinner? The talking head of Satan, who, in a moment of sheer idiocy, shoots himself in the career? Or the proud man, that refuses an apology?

Do the math:
Are there really hundreds of millions of Caribbeans?

After months of .700+ ball, you're not just hot anymore ... You're Good

by angus hanger on Aug 10, 2005 7:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm sure there are hundreds of millions
You do the math. Caribbeans don't have to live in the Caribbean. They can live in the US, Europe, Asia, anywhere they want - they could've immigrated elsewhere and still consider themselves Carribean.
There's no crying in baseball!

by gigglingone on Aug 10, 2005 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ah, ah ... be nice ...
I did and it still does not add up.
  1. I was born and raised in Florida ... specifically Orlando and Miami.
  2. While there may be persons of Carribean descent that could reach that total, there is simply are not enough population currently living, in that region, to arrive at that figure, whether they are incensed or otherwise ...
  3. I am half american indian, and have seen racism displayed first hand. I am not buying the race card played.
  4. The statement made was to engage thinking, not arguement.
I would prefer to agree to disagree.
After months of .700+ ball, you're not just hot anymore ... You're Good

by angus hanger on Aug 10, 2005 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

data
One web site estimates 38.4M people in the Caribbean in 2000.

by Apricot on Aug 10, 2005 6:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

we'll see today
Felipe says he didn't want Larry fired.  If he restarts his radio program again today then Alou is a liar.

As to the assertion that the giants didn't want Krueger fired, I don't buy that.  There were some really pissed off people over at SBC and this happened pretty quickly so I'm guessing KNBR did this to placate the giants.  The Satan sendup was just the final straw which started things early.  Krueger was probably gone next Monday at 7:00 p.m. when his suspension was over.  I'm a bit sad as Larry had a pretty listenable show and got good guests.  Even though I didn't always agree with him he put together a good show and spent time on it.  KNBR is definitely under the giants thumb like Ratto said.

by skwid on Aug 10, 2005 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Krueger was all set to return to work
It had been agreed upon by management.  Until the Satan/South Park parody--for which Krueger had utterly no responsibility--there were no plans to fire him.  Talk about saving face.
A Beane in the hand is worth $60M in payroll

by jeepers on Aug 10, 2005 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree!
What is more offensive?  To call someone "braindead" or to call them "Satan"?  I personally would rather be called stupid than evil...

by Flash G on Aug 10, 2005 11:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

Krueger is just another victim
Felipe Alou practically went on a crusade to get rid of this troublesome dissenter, Larry Krueger. LOL, he even called him a messenger of Satan. Alou's brain truly has turned into mush.

The freakin national media is to be blamed for this travesty also. I try to watch highlights of the A's game against the Royals and Sportscenter made the Krueger comments its top story.

All this bad publicity made it clear that heads were going to roll and it's just sad that one of KNBR's better talkshow host had to go.

by RockLee on Aug 10, 2005 12:55 AM PDT reply actions  

Sheesh
Where does the common sense go? Mass stupidity is so very frightening.

It's amazing to me that a mass media that won't take the time to think anything through beyond the surface 99% of the time WILL take the time to dissect a hot cereal reference and turn it into veritable KKK propoganda.

Did it ever occur to anyone that Cream of Wheat just happens to be very MUSHY thus the awkward elegance of the metaphor?

Ron Washington: Thinking outside of the three-sided box since 1977

by tankerraid on Aug 10, 2005 8:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's been reported that,
throughout Krueger's broadcast last Wednesday, Krueger praised Alou as a manager, but said that it's been so hard for Alou to play the hand he's been dealt that Alou's mind has been turned to Cream of Wheat.

So this leaves the "Caribbean" comment as the bone of contention. What if Krueger had said "brain-dead Bahamian hitters?" Ah, the fine nuances.

Re last night's game, can I go off on "brain-dead Dakotan 2nd basemen, bungling double-play balls" without getting banned?

Only if Ellis were a person of color, apparently.

(Note: I love Ellis.)

Let us not continue to debate how many Angels can be dashed on the head of a pin. Let's just get to it while the gettin' is good.

by Checkswing HR on Aug 10, 2005 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ahhh
I see. So the relentless drive to uncover BreakfastGate was sogged in lieu of accusing racial epithet.

I dunno. The line on offensive moniker is so personal. Thus the debate. But I still don't think his comments were worthy of a firing.

Ron Washington: Thinking outside of the three-sided box since 1977

by tankerraid on Aug 10, 2005 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

hah...
I was similarly going to go off on "brain-dead Canadian pitchers trying to bare-hand line drives..."   ;)
They're young... but they can play!

by Poppy on Aug 10, 2005 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Where will Krueger land on his feet?
Hmmm, KGO has to replace Starkey--he's a good reporter but being on the outs with the Giants probably discounts him...though I wonder how long CoW (cream of wheat) will have a job.

Also, didn't Knapp have a column saying how Alou handled this situation with dignity yesterday?  That must have been written before the Satan comments were made.

by room812 on Aug 10, 2005 1:08 AM PDT reply actions  

What's up
That is pretty wrong to be fired, but the only question I have is who is going to replace him? Brooks or some cocky young guy off the streets.
You may have the greatest bunch of individual stars in the world, but if they don't play together, the club wont be worth a dime.-Babe Ruth

by doublehustle22 on Aug 10, 2005 2:09 AM PDT reply actions  

FP Santangelo?
"Don't be an ass!" --Bill King

by batgirl on Aug 10, 2005 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

i feel sorry for krueger
and even more sorry for these other two.  what are the details of this other incident?  the caribbean thing is overblown enough, but making fun of alou got the other two fired?  
that is absolutely ridiculous.  
If I weren't playing baseball, I'd be... "in the Ultimate Fighting Championship." -Rich Harden

by xbhaskarx on Aug 10, 2005 2:20 AM PDT reply actions  

Krueger
got a bum deal.  I think Alou has overreacted to distract from his piss poor job as manager of a terrible team.

by oscarwdog on Aug 10, 2005 5:42 AM PDT reply actions  

The Giant's may feel good about the firings
...but the team sucks.

Shake up or mediocrity to reign?

First Place in the AL West! ...A'smA's-zing!

by A s Eh on Aug 10, 2005 7:02 AM PDT reply actions  

Bottom line: Alou wasn't backing down
Kreuger was probably going to be fired before his suspension was up anyway.

KNBR has been the PR arm of the Giants for over 25 years, and this is part of the "deal with the devil" they've made.

But if the Giants think KNBR will bring back Frank Dill and Mike Cleary they have another thing coming.

by Rob @ Athletics Nation on Aug 10, 2005 7:19 AM PDT reply actions  

I think that they were really fired for...
...continuing to stir things up when KNBR wants nothing more than for this to go away.  It's bad enough for the station that the national media are going nuts over this.  The last thing KNBR needs is its own employees keeping this issue alive.  If Agnew and Rhein couldn't figure that out, they're even dumber than Kreuger.
"I'm a lexicon devil with a battered brain."--Darby Crash

by lexdevil on Aug 10, 2005 8:02 AM PDT reply actions  

Urban?
I'm sending KNBR another letter on Urban. With LK gone, somebody has to step in. I would rather have it be an A's person.
"In 1930, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, in an effort to alleviate the effects of the... Anyone? Anyone"

by Parklife on Aug 10, 2005 8:11 AM PDT reply actions  

Urban would quit his MLB.com
A's beat job.
Let us not continue to debate how many Angels can be dashed on the head of a pin. Let's just get to it while the gettin' is good.

by Checkswing HR on Aug 10, 2005 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Krueger got EXACTLY what he deserved
Ask yourself why he used the exact words he did.  Why would anyone use the term "Caribbean"?  There is only one reason - that he knew EXACTLY what he was saying, and he meant it, and he consciously dialed down the ethnic terminology to try and slip it in under the radar.

Felipe's 100% right to want his head on a platter.  I'm happy to see a piece of crap like Krueger on the soup line.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 8:38 AM PDT reply actions  

If he said..
Caribbean Studs would it be this bad?
"You know I don't like beautiful, well put together women, give me a nice nose break or a lazy eye." Johnny Drama

by rook on Aug 10, 2005 8:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with you about Krueger
but I think Agnew and Rhein should not be fired.  That was over the top.
Two-thirds of the earth is covered by water, the other third is covered by Kotsay.

by carp on Aug 10, 2005 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

But we don't know what was happening there
Perhaps KNBR had sent out a directive to everyone at the station about conduct regarding the issue. If that's the case, then purposefully putting together a satire of Alou's comments were against the directive. We don't know what was going on inside KNBR, just what they are releasing.

Agnew and Rhein made a poor judgement call. To put together a piece ridiculing Alou when the station is in the midst of all this is not a smart idea. And again, we have no idea what the KNBR staff was told they should and should not do while all of this is going on...

There's no crying in baseball!

by gigglingone on Aug 10, 2005 10:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

I disagree completely
As a friend pointed out to me last night, players are not really taught patience at the plate in Caribbean countries because it's the heavy hitting that's valued so highly.  Hence, they might be more apt to "hack at slop nightly"

This really seems to me like a huge overreaction by well-intentioned, but overly-sensitive people.

by LD on Aug 10, 2005 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

You know, this really pisses me off
A bunch or rich indignant athletes can't accept an apology, so they create such a fuss that two working people end up getting fired for nothing.  Making fun of Felipe's Satan comments is NOTHING--they were RIDICULOUS, and DESERVED to be made fun of.  

I hope they're happy.  Now three people who, unlike them, actually rely on their paycheck to live, are kicked out onto the street--one, in Tony Rhein, who just got married, and whom I doubt very much made the big bucks.  The Giants should be ashamed of themselves.

A Beane in the hand is worth $60M in payroll

by jeepers on Aug 10, 2005 9:05 AM PDT reply actions  

Edit to say two
I wouldn't have fired Krueger, but I can't really argue with it, either.
A Beane in the hand is worth $60M in payroll

by jeepers on Aug 10, 2005 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

KNBR Right to Fire Krueger and Agnew
I've enjoyed Larry Krueger's show in the past and was delighted to hear someone on KNBR criticize the Gnats. But Krueger's Caribbean comment was purely and simply racism of the worst order. Now I'm anything but PC--however this was overt. It's difficult for me to believe that some people here can't see why the comment was offensive to those native to the Caribbean.

Now everybody can make a mistake and KNBR was right for initially giving Krueger a 7 day suspension. But Krueger, having opened the wound, must have had a death wish by rubbing dirt in it with his satire coming on the first day back at the job. And Agnew was doubtless fired because he approved Krueger's inclusion of the South Park "satanic" sound bites.

A few words about Bob Agnew. He was general manager at KCBS when I wrote news for that station in 1980. Agnew was feared and hated by EVERYONE in the newsroom. He was called Bob Dogdoo because he was like a lamebrained fraternity boy. Worst of all, he knew nothing about news and won't the newsroom to focus upon gossip and sensation. Most of us refused.Agnew "resigned" from the station in 1982 and turned to sports broadcasting in Philly for awhile until KNBR hired him.

In the newsroom and in numerous comments, Agnew expressed nothing but contempt for minorities and women, so I can see this carrying over into his approval of the Krueger "satire". Among KNBR's rank and file, I have little doubt that his firing was applauded...

by reztips on Aug 10, 2005 9:18 AM PDT reply actions  

Krueger wasn't responsible for the satire
He doesn't host the morning show.  That would be Murphy and Liota (sp).  Although as I said, it's hard for me to argue against his firing, even if it's not the decision I would have made.

The insider's perspective on Agnew helps some.  I still don't think that mocking Alou's ricidulous Satan comments is much of an offense, but someone with that much experience probably should have known better than to allow the would to be salted.

Firing Tony Rhein is just plain weak.

A Beane in the hand is worth $60M in payroll

by jeepers on Aug 10, 2005 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

You can't be serious!!!
"Racism of the worst order"?!  That statement is ridiculous and totally insensitive itself!  Let's ask Rosa Parks if Krueger is an example of racism of the worst order.

Krueger made a mistake that I'm sure he'll never make again.  I don't have a problem with him being punished, but Alou hasn't handled this situation with any class or dignity in my opinion.

by Flash G on Aug 10, 2005 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

Racism of the worst order??
Haha..jeez...extreme much?
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Aug 10, 2005 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Error
Error in my above post. Of course I meant "wanted" rather than "won't." The sentence should read: "Worst of all, he knew nothing about news and wanted the newsroom to focus upon gossip and sensation."

by reztips on Aug 10, 2005 9:22 AM PDT reply actions  

I lost a lot of respect
for Felipe Alou and for KNBR from this incident. Krueger's comments were at worst insensitive and at best ill-phrased; he is most guilty of a somewhat poor sense of Geography.

For an "old-school" manager to accuse Larry Krueger of prejudice is the pot calling the kettle, er...what PC word can I use that won't get me fired?

When Alou and his fellow "good ol' boys" cronies show tolerance for female umpires and openly gay athletes, then we'll talk. Until then, as far as I'm concerned, Alou is nothing more than an overrated manager who communicates through silence, is "too proud" to accept an apology (or admit mistakes), overmanages and exhausts his bullpen, and wants to take out a lousy season on a scapegoat.

Nico

by Nico on Aug 10, 2005 9:41 AM PDT reply actions  

That's not a workable standard
I disagree completely with your take on Kreuger's remarks, which as I said above look to me to be deliberate and clear denigration of a particular ethnic group.  Alou saw through the deliberately toned down language (toned down to try and slip in an ethnic denigration without getting caught) and, correctly in my view, saw the sharp meaning behind the fuzzy words.  I'm honestly surprised you or anyone else takes it another way.

But beyond that, the standard of waiting to take action against an offender until others similarly get in line is just silly.  Do we wait to punish thieves because cops are also stealing stuff from the evidence room?  Of course not - we look to punish them both.

Whether or not Alou is a good baseball manager is irrelevant to this discussion.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sort of true
No one looks to punish baseball for being a homophobic and sexist institution, unless you go Rocker on someone.  Going Everett on someone is still perfectly acceptable.  

Taking away someone's livelihood over something they've acknowledged as a mistake, which they've made every effort to remedy, is harsh.  And I have no respect for Felipe driving the nails in the coffin by ridculously likening Krueger to Satan.

A Beane in the hand is worth $60M in payroll

by jeepers on Aug 10, 2005 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Female umpires and gay ballplayers
Oh, Nico, that is such an excellent point.

Alou and every baseball player who have expressed outrage over Krueger's comments need to be asked that question.

Part of me understands Alou's indignation.  He's undoubtedly put up with worse crap during his career, and doesn't want to hear any of it - nor does he want to hear some apology.

But somebody needed to calm Alou down, and it doesn't sound like anyone did.

The national media may focus on the racial comments, but locally, this looks like what Ratto described it as being: a pure Giants power play to quash dissent on "their" station.

by bear88 on Aug 10, 2005 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly, bear88,
I think you're right on. This was a power play, by Alou against someone Alou didn't like, grabbed when the opportunity presented itself. I'm neither Hispanic nor religious, but if I am to step back and be objective, of all the comments I would say Alou's "messenger of Satan" reference is the only one worthy of a firing.
Nico

by Nico on Aug 10, 2005 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm surprised they fired him
too bad he didn't just assault a cameraman... maybe he'd be back on the air by now!

by miguel on Aug 10, 2005 9:49 AM PDT reply actions  

Wait,
won't Kreuger be on the air for 2-3 more months during the appeals process?
Nico

by Nico on Aug 10, 2005 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

and earned his salary
and bonuses for appearing in the radio all-star contest
There's no crying in baseball!

by gigglingone on Aug 10, 2005 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

on that note
maybe Alou would forgive him if he could throw a curveball. Maybe a little slider, ANYTHING!
Mark Ellis---"this is the funnest team we've ever been on -- Little League, high school, whatever. This is great."

by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Aug 10, 2005 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh I think
he threw a curveball all right!
Nico

by Nico on Aug 10, 2005 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

But
Alou would have brought in a different pitcher to throw each pitch.

Fresno #1- one fast ball
Slow walk out
Fresno #2- Curve ball
Slow walk out
Fresno #3- slider
Slow walk out
Fresno #4- Change up
Slow walk out
Hawkins- Fast ball down the middle jacked

Alou's head explodes, the Giants lose.

BTW- this story made the front page of the papers, where their loss to the Braves was on page 7. Got to love Gnats Baseball!

"You know I don't like beautiful, well put together women, give me a nice nose break or a lazy eye." Johnny Drama

by rook on Aug 10, 2005 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ah, but the key is
that each time, Felipe would have walked out to the mound not just slowly, but with that macho "strong silent type" expression that shows deep emotion that is carefully suppressed because he is a MAN.
Nico

by Nico on Aug 10, 2005 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

That's Hemingway waiting to happen...
...and Felipe stood tall and deliberate, walking slowly to the mound because he was a man, only more so, and the stadium fell silent as this strong man walked slowly to the mound, so silent you could hear the dust fall on his shoes. And the women swooned as he took the ball in his manly weather-worn hands and spake the words "Get thee to the showers, Satan!"
"I don't care what anyone calls it as long as the umpires call it a strike." ~ Rich Harden, on his "Spluckle Ball"

by almostreggie on Aug 10, 2005 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

How true
Punching someone in the face is much more acceptable that making one ill-considered comment, one which is hard to prove was even meant as a racial slight.
A Beane in the hand is worth $60M in payroll

by jeepers on Aug 10, 2005 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

You guys listening to Gary?
This is going to be a great 2 1/2 hours.

by HigherPie on Aug 10, 2005 9:51 AM PDT reply actions  

Listening to Radnich....
Apparently corporate honchos at Susquhanna made the call to pull the plug to avoid further emberassment before someone got the tape to Alou and he went off all over again.

by BleacherDave on Aug 10, 2005 9:55 AM PDT reply actions  

It's bigger than that,...
Susquhanna Media is for sale.  33 radio stations and their cable properties.  Valued at around $2 Billion.  Given that, I'm surprised Krueger lasted that long.  Last thing anyone wants in that situation is anything that could even remotely give a potential bidder any cause for pause.

SOunds like Agnew had to go cuz someone in managment had to be sacrificed, and unfortunately he was the line manager that was closest to the situation.

Business.

by BleacherDave on Aug 10, 2005 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

KNBR could have prevented this...
...by issuing a clear statement to its employees regarding how Kreuger incident should be discussed publicly on and off air.  Call in/talk radio is a risky medium.  Callers say wacky stuff, hosts have brain farts, sh** happens.  It's not like this kind of thing is unheard of.  

Any station in this business should have an emergency plan for when something like this goes down...because you know it's going to happen sometime.  Once an incident occurs, the station needs to be very clear with its employees about how it will be handled and discussed.  This is especially true, given that these folks are, under normal circumstances, encouraged to be irreverent and provocative.  If KNBR had made it clear to its employees that the Kreuger incident should not be made light of, this might have been avoided.  And if KNBR did direct its employees in this manner, they disregarded that direction.

"I'm a lexicon devil with a battered brain."--Darby Crash

by lexdevil on Aug 10, 2005 10:03 AM PDT reply actions  

That's my point exactly
If a statement to the employees was made, then they disregarded it. Perhaps the statement included the possible punishment of termination. We don't know what happens inside radio stations unless they public release the information.
There's no crying in baseball!

by gigglingone on Aug 10, 2005 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

It probably
only specified "NO references to breakfast meals." Just as the Giants have probably instructed Alou to avoid further references to the anti-Christ, but have neglected to instruct him to use 4 relievers or fewer to get through the 8th inning.
Nico

by Nico on Aug 10, 2005 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

That would have been Agnew's job,
lexdevil. And obviously, instead of doing so, he assisted in aiding and abetting Krueger's satan satire...

by reztips on Aug 10, 2005 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Again
It wasn't Krueger's satire.  Krueger isn't on the morning show.  That's Murphy and Liota (sp).
A Beane in the hand is worth $60M in payroll

by jeepers on Aug 10, 2005 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

I woke up to KNBR this morning and heard the bomb
They said that the term "Caribean" is extremely offensive to the people of that region. Its comparable to the "N" word in the US.

I'm Asian - I've lived in the melting pot of the East Bay my entire life - and I NEVER KNEW THAT!!!! Can anyone verify that?

by Kaybeejay on Aug 10, 2005 10:07 AM PDT reply actions  

That's Cass...
I don't buy that for a minute.

by BleacherDave on Aug 10, 2005 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, she's a complete moron
A complete moron. I think we'd know if that were the case. It's not even like "Oriental." If it were we'd know.

by RLangford on Aug 10, 2005 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

How about when Bill PArcels said..
"We used a jap play - no offense to orientials out there".

That's way more offensive that what Krueger did.

by Kaybeejay on Aug 10, 2005 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

My wife...
Is Vietnamese, and says it's comparable to calling Asians "Orientals". For what it's worth...

by HigherPie on Aug 10, 2005 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

Or telling a Jew
that his brain has turned to gefilte fish.
Nico

by Nico on Aug 10, 2005 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

And by the way...
Phil Wood on XM satellite's "Home Plate" uses the phrase "Oriental players" constantly, which drives me nuts. Unlike Krueger, he's a repeat offender.

by HigherPie on Aug 10, 2005 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

Bleacher Dave
Shoot me an e-mail at mychael.urban@mlb.com when you get a chance. I want to chat with you about something. Thanks.

by MychaelUrban on Aug 10, 2005 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

The way Krueger used it it was offensive
He clearly used the term Caribbean as a euphemism for Latin, Hispanic, or Latino, and used it deliberately because he knew that if he used one of those three words, he would be fired on the spot.  He was trying to communicate the message "brain dead Latin players" and thought he could get away with it by using a less obvious term.  He was wrong.  Good riddance.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 10:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

So he was trying to get fired?
He wasn't just making reference to the commonly held belief in baseball that Latin players are taught to be aggressive at the plate, because "you can't walk your way off the island?"
A Beane in the hand is worth $60M in payroll

by jeepers on Aug 10, 2005 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Of course not
He thought "Caribbean" was fuzzy enough language that he wouldn't get called on it, and his job would be safe.  He was wrong.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

Some are saying that
"Caribbean" is "well-known code" for "Spic" or what have you. I'd love to see a poll confirming that as people's perception, because it sure is news to me.

Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines is changing its name to  West Indies Funships.

Let us not continue to debate how many Angels can be dashed on the head of a pin. Let's just get to it while the gettin' is good.

by Checkswing HR on Aug 10, 2005 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure about "well known"
But in this case, it's deliberate code.  He's referring to ethnicity, but not using a common term so as to make it less obvious that he's referring to ethnicity.  Alou was smart enough to see through it and rightly call him on it.  End of story.

The thing is, the "it was just a stupid mistake" argument would have more weight if Krueger had used "Latin" or some other common term instead of "Caribbean."  At least in that case, the idea that he just flew off the handle and said something he didn't mean might hold some water.  In this case, the use of the term Caribbean says to me that he thought about it, knew it would be offensive to use "Latin" or some other commonly understood ethnic term, and deliberately tried to use a not-as-racially charged substitute.  Given the time/thought it takes to do that, you have to conclude he meant what he said.

Therefore, it's 100% appropriate that he's been fired from a mass media provider for denigrating an ethnic group on the air.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

If,
If for 2/3rds of a season you're watching Feliz and Cruz swinging at pitches in the dirt 10 feet in front of the plate, you want to criticize them for it, but you'd prefer not to call them out by name, how, pray tell, would you refer to them? "Players whose names end in 'z'?"

It's clearly a double standard. If I obliquely referred to Erstad and Ellis as "brain-dead Dakotan infielders," nobody would be inferring these wild hidden meanings, for the simple reason that THAT'S WHERE THEY'RE FROM and, of course, because Ellis and Erstad are white.

Let us not continue to debate how many Angels can be dashed on the head of a pin. Let's just get to it while the gettin' is good.

by Checkswing HR on Aug 10, 2005 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

It may be a double standard,
but it's one that everyone (well, most people, anyway) are fully aware of, and one that is incorporated into the American vernacular.  Again, Krueger was clearly aware of it also, so that's why he deliberately used the choice of words he did.

There are plenty of ways to call out Cruz and Feliz without using a thinly vieled euphemism for Latino (how about "I think we know who I'm talking about here").  Krueger knew that too.

Krueger chose his words pretty carefully here, and his message came across loud and clear.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

In this situation
You call them out by name. These guys are public figures, if they strike out a lot, you can say "Feliz strikes out a lot". Its far better to do that than to lump them into a group based on their ethnicity.
Mark Ellis---"this is the funnest team we've ever been on -- Little League, high school, whatever. This is great."

by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Aug 10, 2005 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly and that represents
the specific reality at hand.  This person X and that person Y, etc, strikes out a lot and takes swings at balls he should not....but obvioiusly it can be made in more vivid but PC language.
Royale with cheese. (resubscribed to cable recently)

by ak_A on Aug 10, 2005 6:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Plus
Ellison, Matheny, and Niekro were just as bad about swinging at everything.

by irwin on Aug 10, 2005 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Doesn't the Caribbean include
people who are black and speak English, and people who are black and speak French?

And doesn't the Caribbean consist of a bunch of islands, hence "can't walk off the island"?  Nobody uses "Caribbean" to refer to Mexicans or Venezuelans or Panamanians.

by floyd on Aug 10, 2005 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

krueger interview
heres a link to a show with a bunch of the allegedly "satanic" krueger comments
http://nbxsportshow.com/broadcast/?media=16467.mp3

by dj4roy on Aug 10, 2005 10:30 AM PDT reply actions  

Serious Conflict Of Interest
This whole affair can easily be attributed to a serious conflict of interest. A media outlet should not own any percentage of anything that it reports on on a dialy basis. This clearly shows how it limits freedom of speech and objective reporting.

by bayfrank on Aug 10, 2005 10:51 AM PDT reply actions  

A real disgrace
I never knew I could hate this spineless, sycophantic station any more than I already do.

Almost nobody really even knew Krueger's comments were that bad until Alou went insane. And the morning show bit had it on the mark. "Messenger of Satan"? He's out of his mind.

All that said, the truth is in the posting above. It's all about the guys at corporate and the sale of the station.

Radnich is not liking the Giants right now. He just referred to Krukow's morning bit as stupid drivel. And he just tore off a terrific insult at Barry.

Rick and Rod will have nothing of interest to say about this.

What will Barbieri do? He had a fairly eloquent defense of Krueger yesterday. (Disclaimer: I hate Barbieri.) Easy prediction: Barbieri will blame it in large part on the national media that covered the story. He won't blame the station; he won't blame Alou; he won't blame the Giants; he won't blame Krueger. He'll stupidly blame the messenger.

What a bunch of braindead idiots. Too bad this will all blow over and the station will get back to ass-kissing business as usual.

by RLangford on Aug 10, 2005 10:52 AM PDT reply actions  

I've got new respect...
for Gary.  He continues to expose Rick, and shared his honest thoughts about Krukow.

by BleacherDave on Aug 10, 2005 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Braindead
isn't that what started this.  Maybe Krueger should have called his own station braindead instead of the the Giants

by theblackpearl on Aug 10, 2005 11:04 AM PDT reply actions  

This highlights the Giants circus
The entire Giants organization has become a circus and this year has been the result of years of mismanagement:
  1. Sabean built an old team around a 40+ year old jerk, who is now injured and may decide to not show up in a Giants uniform ever again.
  2. The new stadium draws fans who would be better suited for watching the latest flick at the Metreon.
  3. Giants lose games repeatedly and management distracts fans by continually unveiling statues of former players. Note: most fans have little idea who these players were.
  4. Krueger, an intelligent baseball guy torn by his allegiance to KNBR and the Giants, snaps from watching this Giants monstrosity -- and  actually becomes critical of Alou's poor management and the ineptitude of the Giants management.
I never liked Krueger that much, but I do feel sorry for him. The entire franchise and KNBR needs a change of attitude and management.

by Berkeley Steve on Aug 10, 2005 11:26 AM PDT reply actions  

In fact...
Maybe the Giants will make good and have Larry Krueger Day, unveil a statue outside SBC, invite Krueger back to parade around the stadium and sign autographs for the kids, and call it all good. Wouldn't surprise me.

by Berkeley Steve on Aug 10, 2005 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

If Krueger called Alou Satan,
Krueger would be crucified.

Instead, Alou says Krueger is Satan, and Alou is held up like a freaking Civil Rights hero.

What an irony. Making fun of the "Satan" remark is treated more harshly than the Satan remark itself, which, more accurately described, receives no retribution.

Alou should be fired for destroying three men's careers, which come to think of it, is a worse offense than a single adverb in a four-hour radio program.

BTW, journalists are supposed to present both sides of a story. I learned that in High School journalism class, for crying out loud. I have yet to see ESPN et al quote people who are willing to defend Krueger.

Let us not continue to debate how many Angels can be dashed on the head of a pin. Let's just get to it while the gettin' is good.

by Checkswing HR on Aug 10, 2005 11:43 AM PDT reply actions  

What is there to defend?
Krueger deliberately denigrated an entire ethnic group as unintelligent.  What other side of the story is there?

Sometimes the sky is just blue, and there is no need for a counter-argument.  This is one of those cases.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

Dick Williams: Many "other sides"
have been well presented in this thread alone. If your high-horse isn't blocking your view, take a look at some different ideas from your own single point. You are not obviously right. In fact, the majority who have posted on this thread would say you are wrong--and their arguments are thorough and well-reasoned, IMO.
Nico

by Nico on Aug 10, 2005 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

That's my story and I'm sticking to it
Sorry, Nico, but I think the evidence is very clear here.  Are you really suggesting that Krueger's comment wasn't a shot, at least in some part, at Latinos?

And for the record, I'm not talking about Alou's Satan stuff or any other tangential issue.  As for Krueger, he fired a racial salvo, KNBR were well within their rights to fire him for it, and they did so.  End of story.

This isn't a high horse thing - although I appreciate the ad hominem barb - it's just clarity.  There is a lot of stuff swirling around the central issue here that obfuscates the otherwise obvious.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Uninformed
To state that Krueger "denigrated an entire ethnic group as unintelligent" is completely ridiculous.  He made a bad choice to generalize a couple of Giants hitters as brain-dead in their approach at the plate.  He wasn't inferring that all Caribbean's are brain dead.

Simply put he made a racial comment that, in my personal informed opinion, wasn't motivated by racism.  And yes there is a difference.

by rcb on Aug 10, 2005 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

OK...
...so why bring up ethnicity at all?  If it didn't have to do with their ethnicity, and was just about those couple of players as individuals, what difference does their ethnicity make?

That argument holds no water.  I'm sorry.  The only reason to bring up ethnicity is to find fault with it.  Mission accomplished.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Due to the mantra
that "you don't walk off the island", when referring to the style of hitting taught to Caribbean players in order to advance to MLB.

And if you didn't catch it, I did say it was a bad choice to generalize in that manner and that I didn't think it had racist undertones.

by rcb on Aug 10, 2005 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Alou grossly overreacted
Even if he had a point he went overboard. Alou, during this event, has commented about 40 years of discrimination and those 40 years of repressed anger went vomiting all over Krueger.  Alou needs to worry about his sorry team instead of distracting people with a verbbal lynching of a talk show host.

by oscarwdog on Aug 10, 2005 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

A better punishment
would have been to send Krueger on a tour of Caribbean ballparks.

by southofcruiseamerica on Aug 10, 2005 11:52 AM PDT reply actions  

Big Money
Privately held Susqehanna Media has 33 stations for sale along with their cable properties - valued at 2.5 billion dollars.  The company has been on the market since the spring and hasn't sold yet.  Disney/ABC also has radio stations for sale and they are chasing the same pool of bidders.  Susquhanna can't afford anything that is going to cast their properties in a negative light and affect their ability to sell the company and sell it at full price.

I heard a national radio guy talk about how some teams absolutely forbid criticism of the team and its employees on their flagship station.  I used to think that's what the Giants were doing here; were using this incident to make an example of Larry to restrict criticism of the team on KNBR.  I'm sure the Giants are happy to see Krueger go, especially since they don't have to be the heavy.  The Giants benefit, they have a critical voice off the air at an important renewal time for their season ticket base, but they're gonna get some backlash.  I think they would have preferred that a chastened Larry Krueger stayed on the air.  A neutered Krueger would have been an ongoing symbol to not mess with the Giants.  Who knows who they get as a replacement?

Will KNBR feel a need to hire a critical voice in order to maintain the perception of their integrity?  Somehow, I doubt it.

by BleacherDave on Aug 10, 2005 12:04 PM PDT reply actions  

Lost in all of this...
Is the point that Krueger was trying to make.  Carribean/Latin/whatever you would like to call them (I'm just a Mexican, so I don't know) hitters DO tend to hack at slop.  And that is a brain-dead way to hit, in the opinion of many.

by tettleton @ Athletics Nation on Aug 10, 2005 12:28 PM PDT reply actions  

There it is!
See, this is the heart of the problem here.  You're right that this is the point that Krueger was trying to make.  The problem is, it's WRONG.  Guess who leads the majors in pitches per plate appearance?  BOBBY ABREU.  Last I checked, Venezuela's north coast fronts on the Caribbean.

The problem is that there is a stereotype that Latinos aren't as smart, and therefore are more likely to do dumb things, like swing at obviously bad pitches.  Krueger bought into the dumb stereotype, and communicated it on the air.  That he used the term Caribbean only points to the deliberate - not knee jerk - nature of making the comment.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re
Yeah, the problem is that radio show hosts have a lot of say in perpetuating stereotypes. Just because you may think something privately (and whether it is accurate or not), people with public jobs---such as radio hosts for non-political, non-partisan sports teams have a responsibility to a) not alienate their audience, and b)not encourage the public at-large to buy into the stereotype.

Not everyone will agree on what is prejudiced or not, but I think Kruegers comment (the "braindead" one, not the COW one which meant nothing) clearly would offend some people. I'm not a particularly sensitive person, but the last thing I'd want to hear on the air is "So-and-so is holding out for more money", the response being (in jest) "Well, he is Jewish".

Look, I don't know whether or not Krueger should have been fired, but I don't think you could ever say that his comments weren't that offensive, especially if you are not a member of the nationality called into question.

Mark Ellis---"this is the funnest team we've ever been on -- Little League, high school, whatever. This is great."

by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Aug 10, 2005 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

The only stereotyping committed
was about a hitting style.  You can call an action stupid without inferring that the one performing the action is unintelligent.  Just as I think the position of your post is dumb, but it doesn't mean that I think you're not a bright person, maybe just uniformed on this topic.

by rcb on Aug 10, 2005 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't see where you get that
He did use the term "brain dead Caribbean", not "free swinging Caribbean", after all.  There's a big difference.  If he said the latter, you'd be right, and we probably wouldn't be here right now.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

But the complete phrase was . . .
"Brain dead Caribbeans hitters hacking at slop nightly."  Get the facts!  Sure if all he said was "I think Caribbeans are brain dead", then I agree with you, but he didn't.  So why don't you figure out what he said and stop taking tidbits of his rant to make your points.

by rcb on Aug 10, 2005 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

rcb
If you want to stand by "brain dead Caribbean hitters hacking at slop nightly," as not racially offensive, be my guest.  I think we're all well aware of the full transcript of Krueger's remarks, so feel free to save your accusations of selective editing.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 1:34 PM PDT reply actions  

Open your eyes when you read my posts
What I've said from the beginning is that I think it was wrong to use the Caribbean identifier and never have I said that they weren't racially offensive, but rather that I don't think it was motivated by racism!  There is a big difference.  One is a mistake and one isn't, one should be reprimanded and the other unforgiven.

And yes, you are selectively editing when you only refer to the phrase "brain dead Caribbeans".

by rcb on Aug 10, 2005 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think the point
rcb is trying to make, and if so one that I share, is that the comment did not state nor imply any lesser intelligence on the part of "Caribbean players," it merely stated that players from a certain region are known for a more free-swinging approach. True or false, that's the implication--no, not implication, stated words--not any suggestion about intelligence. And since the phrase "You don't walk your way off the island" is part of baseball lore, it's hardly on Krueger to reference it. Whether or not he was insensitive to use the term Caribbean is separate from whether he intended to disparage the group he may have been insensitive to mention.
Nico

by Nico on Aug 10, 2005 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wait a second
now, I didn't hear the actual program, I only read the newspaper stories, but did he not say "brain dead caribbean players"? Because to me if he did say that it is clearly suggesting a link between "brain-dead" and "caribbean".
Mark Ellis---"this is the funnest team we've ever been on -- Little League, high school, whatever. This is great."

by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Aug 10, 2005 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Alien:
I don't think "brain-dead Caribbeans" implies the belief that Caribbeans are brain-dead. If it does, then Krueger is not guilty of racism so much as he is guilty of redundancy--over which he most certainly should be fired and terminated, and should probably lose his job.
Nico

by Nico on Aug 10, 2005 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

My personal view
is that he shouldn't have been fired. He was ranting about his team, and I don't think he intended to disparage Caribbeans, and I believe that his recognition of his mistake and apology (and one week suspension) were sufficient.

Nico, you are bright enough to see that Krueger probably didn't mean that all Caribbeans are brain dead. Unfortunately, the public at-large is generally not. As I said previously, when you've got a job like Krueger's, you've got to be very careful not to perpetuate stereotypes. Maybe this limits free speech, maybe its too "PC", but in a country that is so sensitive to racism, I think its important to try and keep ethnicity "out of it" whenever possible. The fact that so many people DID link "braindead" and "Caribbean" together illustrates how quickly people make those connections.

Mark Ellis---"this is the funnest team we've ever been on -- Little League, high school, whatever. This is great."

by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Aug 10, 2005 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes, but if Krueger
is supposed to dumb his speech down to the standard of "the public at large," he is limited to, "Pretty bird, team lose a lot, swinging and missing bad, hitting good, pretty bird!"

But then I'm not all that impressed with "the American public."

Also, in an attempt to make a joke that relies on the next post being the one I think it will be:

"N-81...N-81."

Nico

by Nico on Aug 10, 2005 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't get it
Does that mean I'm part of the public-at-large?

I hope not, I've always thought they smell bad.

Mark Ellis---"this is the funnest team we've ever been on -- Little League, high school, whatever. This is great."

by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Aug 10, 2005 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

If you want to disect this further . . .
he said brain dead Caribbean hitters.  Both brain dead and Caribbean are adjectives for the noun, hitters.  You would be correct if brain dead was intended to be an adjective for Caribbeans, but it wasn't.  My opinion of the intent wasn't to imply that Caribbeans are brain dead, but rather that the hitters (who happen to be Caribbeans and wrongly identified as such by Krueger) are brain dead for "hacking at slop nightly".

I am officially exhausted of this topic.

by rcb on Aug 10, 2005 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes, I'm sick of it too
Especially since I honestly don't care about Krueger, KNBR, cream of wheat, Alex Sanchez, Felipe Alou, or anyone affiliated with the Giants.

Why are we talking about this again?

Mark Ellis---"this is the funnest team we've ever been on -- Little League, high school, whatever. This is great."

by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Aug 10, 2005 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Disagree
Respectfully Nico and rcb, I disagree.  When someone describes "brain dead Caribbean hitters hacking at slop nightly" (see rcb, I can type the whole thing if you need me to), that person is stating - not implying - a connection between Caribbean ethnicity (which Krueger used deliberately as a euphemism for Latino) and a lack of intelligence with a third connection to free-swinging.  A breakdown of the phrasing looks like: dumb=latino=free swinging.  He made the choice to use all three, and it's disingenuous to suggest he only really meant to make a connection between 2 of them and not all 3.

Krueger's deliberate choice of the euphemism "Caribbean" shows that he was aware of the incendiary nature of his statement, but chose to make it anyway.  That deliberate, thought-out choice shows intent to disparage.

Believe me, I recognize that Alou is being held to a different standard, and that the PC police go overboard a lot of the time, but in this case, looking at the facts we have in front of us, this guy meant what he said, and what he said was racist.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

DW: I think I just
"pre-replied" to this above--I am nothing, if not efficient!  : - }
Nico

by Nico on Aug 10, 2005 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Krueger deserved it
It's too bad that 2 of his colleagues had to go down the toilet with him.

by Fongpay on Aug 10, 2005 2:41 PM PDT reply actions  

Why doesn't Ray Ratto work for KNBR
I'd like to see him get fired also :)

Seriously though, do we really want Satan to have a nightly radio show?

by Bearcat on Aug 10, 2005 2:43 PM PDT reply actions  

Braindead hitters, not Braindead Caribbeans
It's not a comment on their intelligence in general; it's a comment on their aggression at the plate as a measure of baseball intelligence. Okay, baseball intelligence.

Yes, that is a racial think to say. I've always thought what he said was racist, but I've also thought it wasn't very serious. In a way, Alou himself is making a racial judgment about such players, as is the entire national media, in how they are typically characterized. Krueger just ran with that and called that style of play, that baseball mentality, "braindead."

And please, "Dick Williams," don't cite Bobby Abreu to make an argument--isn't that simpleminded and anecdotal? Really, one worthwhile thing that could emerge from this nonsense would be to examine whether Alou, Krueger, and so many other people are right or wrong in their characterization of such hitters as a group. Because, you see, Alou's right their with Krueger--Krueger just said it was braindead.

And, finally, the sort of racist impulse Krueger and Alou and so many others easily fall victim to is all around us in sports.

Quick, if I say a player is a thug, what color is his skin? What if I say he works very hard without a lot of talent? What if I say he's a lunch-bucket guy? Or scrappy? If I say an NFL receiver has pure athletic talent and speed--what color is he? If I say the guy that lines up opposite him runs precise patterns, what color is he?

by RLangford on Aug 10, 2005 2:57 PM PDT reply actions  

Huh?
I thought citing Abreu was "examining whether Alou, Krueger, and so many other people are right or wrong in their characterization of such hitters as a group."  I used it as evidence to suggest that this stereotype is wrong.  And of course it doesn't stop with Abreu, but you'll agree that the fact that he's #1 in a statistic that measures plate discipline carries some rhetorical punch.  Other Latino players in the Top 40 in pitches seen per plate appearance include:

Manny Ramirez
David Ortiz
Luis Castillo
Melvin Mora
Raoul Ibanez
Felipe Lopez

Also, I must have missed where Alou characterized Latin players the same way, but I haven't paid a lot of attention to what Alou has said.

I think we all agree the stereotypes you mention are a problem.  What I'm saying is that Krueger's comments served to perpetuate those stereotypes, and did so in a particularly egregious way.  That he was fired from a position in mass media is therefore completely deserved and not at all surprising.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 3:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Mr. Dick Williams
Are you white?

by tettleton @ Athletics Nation on Aug 10, 2005 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Are you now,
or have you ever been, a member of the Communist Party?
Nico

by Nico on Aug 10, 2005 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Because
it just seems to me (and this is just like, my opinion, man) that maybe I, as a Latino, can decide that I am not offended by this, and that maybe that should carry a tad more weight than yours?  I don't know.  I respect your views and opinions, I do.  But the comments were directed towards my heritage, not yours.  If I didn't think the comments were offensive, why should you try to convince me otherwise?

by tettleton @ Athletics Nation on Aug 10, 2005 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying you need to be offended
And I'm not trying to convince you to be offended.  That's completely up to an individual, of course.  I'm Jewish, and there are plenty of occasions where someone, Jewish or otherwise, cries anti-Semitism, and I don't see the intent.  So I understand exactly where you are on this.

In this case though, I really do see an intent to denigrate Latinos, so that offends me as a human being, and it pisses me off.  I'm really surprised that others don't see the intent, because the nature of the statement seems to speak directly to an intent to denigrate.  The choice of words and euphemisms says to me that it was a deliberate statement, and not a knee-jerk accident.  Again, I'm really surprised that this isn't obvious to everyone.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

the only thing that's obvious
...is that intent shouldn't be obvious.  Why?  Because the statement was ambiguous.  Specifically, we don't know whether or not the adjective brain-dead was meant to be applied to the noun hitters separately from the other adjective Caribbean, or whether it was meant to be applied in conjunction with the other adjective.  If separate, then he is characterizing the hitters as being brain-dead and Caribbean, but drawing no connection between the two.  Other issues still remain, like about the accuracy of the term Caribbean, but the relationship between the two terms has been settled; there is no relationship, they are separate.  If in conjunction, then a potentially offensive connection is being made.  But we don't know which of the two was intended.  Thus, the ambiguity.  Further complicating matters is the fact that most people tend to misinterpret ambiguous statements, as they are only able to recognize one or the other of the possible intents.  Furthermore part II, for some people the issue of ethnicity is still so automatically offensive that such a fine distinction as the one made here (which is significant) to them would be beside the point; thus, simply referring to an ethnic/geographical group that one is not a part of, no matter how harmlessly or reasonably, can be rough terrain.

So the only conclusion I'm making from this is that this is just yet another example of why miscommunication is so rampant: people getting fired up and taking drastic actions in response to an issue that they haven't even bothered to precisely define, or may be even incapable of precisely defining.  But if they're incapable of precisely defining it, and they're surrounded by people who are similarly incapable, something tells me that the thought may never occur to them that they are incapable.  Self-awareness sure isn't as rampant as miscommunication.  And initial impressions, often emotionally charged, are often tempting to run with, but that's irresponsible.  Add in a tangled web of conflicting agendas...

Ah the futility of human affairs.    

Rock over London, Rock on Oakland. Wheaties: It's the Breakfast of Champions.

by Cutthemullet on Aug 11, 2005 1:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

see, this is why I'm drawn to sports
you know, the actual games being played, not dime-a-dozen commentary which is taken out of context, misunderstood even within the skewed context, and affecting all sorts of people, with their varying perspectives and varying levels of comprehension of a statement that doesn't even deserve rigorous scrutiny, with varying levels of intensity.  Pure escapism from futile endeavors that I may otherwise be concerned with, like, say, the pursuit of truth.  If that infatuation costs me some fractional level of truth that could've been achieved, so be it, clearly the absolute is beyond attaining.  Too many variables, as outlined in the last post.  And eliminating variables means eliminating life; if humans aren't the ultimate variable, well, excuse me for myopically confining my thinking to the known universe then.  So we'll have to settle for this version of life over truth.  So given the ultimate futility of truth, then why even bother striving for what we call progress.  Because what is that really?  Better half-truths?  Wider acceptance of a concept "known" only fully by the person who initially proposed it?  Moreover, given the unknown, and that we will never know exactly what we do know, can know, don't know, the situation is muddled to the point where I'm already taxing myself to continue on this topic.  And this post is just an example of the fallacy of truth, because the further I delve into my thoughts here, the wider the gap between my thoughts and those of the reader.  Because the more abstractly we speak, the greater the degree of distorting the truth in a way so that some form, at varying levels of closeness, is digestable.  Thus we can only relate over superficial commonalities, such as a baseball team.  That we all relate over, say, the A's, for so many different reasons, can strike people as wonderful (alas, if I'm in a less pensive mood, I'm likely to appreciate this as well).  But if I really get to thinking, which I have here, inspired inexplicably by a sports radio personality whom I'd never listened to, then I see the flaws in such an arrangement, the only arranegment we will ever know, being humans in the whatever billionth year of existence that we are in.  Because if I stop writing this post now, just as an example, what will be the aspect of it that is most remembered on a conscious level?  Probably some overall notion of it as being an unexpectedly deep, philosophical post to find by a guy named cutthemullet on an Oakland A's message board on the Internet, a medium which specializes in the trivial above all else.  Sometime soon the Internet may prove to be a force to strong for the unnatural activity of meaningful thought by humans to overcome.  There will be less of a reason to think, the only reason being maybe to think of ways to make even less thought required.  This change has already occurred on a physical level; the various health consequences are "known" by all to some degree.  The mental parallel seems far more dangerous, but it's the path we are absorbed in, to the extent where I stumble upon a discussion of it only as a tangent to the overall argument I am trying to make here, an argument which in itself is unlikely enough for me to be rather surprised.  (The more tangents I go on, the further I stray from the main argument, of course, but, given the main argument here, that truth is ultimately unknowable, then why should I not investigate all corollaries of the matter as I please, for I would never actually know whether or not truth was unknowable, given that truth is unknowable.)  For if truth was knowable, then it should exist, and it should exist independent of any contingencies that would affect it.  But obviously the contingency of being in a rare mood allowed me to arrive at whatever modest modicum of truth I have gained here (which I have gained only be refuting truth).  So truth is dependent upon some variable as lowly as one human's almost completely unpredicatble emotion?  Surely that cannot be.  Moreover, I can't even define the emotion; it is some sort of subtle emotion that is owed to the complex combination of previous moods and experiences, both recent and not.  If I had to describe it, maybe I'd say some slight sense of detachment would be responsible for all this talk...but the "slight", because if the detachment were stronger, then the current prevaling calmness would be absent, and I would be more concerned with pacifying the immediate tumult as opposed to tackling the futility of certain aspects of the human condition.  I know that I will soon return to some lesser plane of thought, and will be physiologically unable to return to this one for some considerable amount of time, maybe never again to return.  So this knowledge would naturally lead to a desire to exhaust all philosophical insight available in this present state; but, problematically, that desire to maximize this illusory-form-of-truth-producing emotional state will necessarily alter that state to some extent.  Being aware that these limitations are present, in turn, exacerbates the limitation.  So knowledge in this way can hinder other knowledge.  But lack of knowledge has the same effect of hindrance, for if I knew how to combat the effects of the sefl-awareness, I would.  But I don't know how to, in essence, prevent myself from knowing what prevents me from knowing what I'd rather know.    

Logically, then, I think it is true that all this is not truth, but it is not true that I know that it is true that all this is not true.  

Rock over London, Rock on Oakland. Wheaties: It's the Breakfast of Champions.

by Cutthemullet on Aug 11, 2005 3:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

Best. Post. Ever.
To summarize: If you think you know what's going on you're probably full of shit.
Picker of Nits since '63. Or so I thought until I discovered AN. Now I feel like a nitpiker.

by McFood on Aug 11, 2005 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

We've got some bright minds on this site, folks.
Let us not continue to debate how many Angels can be dashed on the head of a pin. Let's just get to it while the gettin' is good.

by Checkswing HR on Aug 11, 2005 11:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

Dick,
If you could have burrowed into Krueger's head at 6:55 pm last Wednesday, "Being John Malkovich"-style, and discovered that there was no racist intent in Krueger's use of the word "Caribbean", would you think that Krueger doesn't deserve to lose his job?
Let us not continue to debate how many Angels can be dashed on the head of a pin. Let's just get to it while the gettin' is good.

by Checkswing HR on Aug 10, 2005 4:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Too hypothetical
CHR, all I have are the words in front of me, and they seem very unambiguous.  I guess your argument is that LK deserves the benefit of the doubt on a first offense.  Fair enough, but I still read significant, deliberate intent to denigrate here.  So did Alou.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 5:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, either that or Alou
saw a window of opportunity to "get" a talk-show host who has angered Felipe by being critical of Alou throughout the season.
Nico

by Nico on Aug 10, 2005 5:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Remember...
I used to be an Expos fan, so I'm pretty familiar with Felipe.  That isn't to say that I'm unreasonably fond of him, especially as an in-game manager and handler of pitching staffs.  That said, he's got a boatload of personal integrity.  He stuck with the Expos when he could have cashed out on several occasions.  On the flip side, when he gets pissed off, he doesn't hold back.  He's also VERY into his Dominican heritage, so I'd have a hard time believing he'd use that as a weapon to bludgeon a talk radio critic.

by DickWilliams on Aug 10, 2005 5:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

On that, I'd have to defer,
because I truly have no way of knowing. It just seemed like one of the possibilities. Not even necessarily a Machiavellian scheme, but maybe a predisposition to hear something a certain way, and/or wish for the demise of a certain career. Who knows. I really have no idea; I just wonder.
Nico

by Nico on Aug 10, 2005 5:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nico, since you are apart of the governing group
of this site, would a poll to see what race individuals are, since this seems to be going in that direction, is inflammatory, or inappropriate for this forum.  I am just curious as too the diversity of the people who comments on this thread and others that have popped up.

by theblackpearl on Aug 10, 2005 4:05 PM PDT reply actions  

Seems totally reasonable to me
Some people (I don't mean anyone on AN especially, just generally) seem to equate acknowledging race, gender, etc., or saying the word "race" or "gender," etc., as being automatically inflammatory or prejudiced in some way, but I don't hold that view and would certainly back you on such a poll. As long as no one is required to answer, and as long as there are options that try to acknowledge all people, I don't see a problem--we've done Geographical distribution, and I'm far more sensitive about my CA heritage (sniff; that diary still hurts) than I am about my race. Just my opinion, though, no mo' no less.
Nico

by Nico on Aug 10, 2005 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Are all announcers tongue tied lately
Doeas anyone know what Mark Grace said, and it is interesteing Arizona isnt going to fire him, at least they say that now, as did KNBR at first.

Diamondbacks television analyst Mark Grace used multiple expletives during a broadcast of Arizona's game against the Florida Marlins.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2130788

by theblackpearl on Aug 10, 2005 4:10 PM PDT reply actions  

f-bomb
there was a technical screw up.  Grace thought he was off the air and dropped the f-bomb multiple times.  so he's not going to get reprimanded.

by Bearcat on Aug 10, 2005 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

That will be Kreugers appeal
He hit the dump button but Carribean still came out

by theblackpearl on Aug 10, 2005 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Orioles are coming to play us on Monday
To get to Ponson, we could chant "Ponson sucks!" or "Ponson is fat" or "Ponson is a felon"

But to really get to him, we could use that terrible, terrible word:

"Pon-son is Ca-rib-be-an!"

Let us not continue to debate how many Angels can be dashed on the head of a pin. Let's just get to it while the gettin' is good.

by Checkswing HR on Aug 10, 2005 4:42 PM PDT reply actions  

No, no
He throws up slop nightly, he doesn't hack at it.

Maybe a sign:

"Sidney Ponson--throwing up slop to hack at since 1998"

A Beane in the hand is worth $60M in payroll

by jeepers on Aug 10, 2005 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ponson in Spanish is Ponzo
Macha is a great manager. -Ron Washington

by pachydermOAFC on Aug 10, 2005 4:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just heard Barbieri say
on the radio that Krueger was scheduled to return to work on Monday.  Until the Morning Show staff (and reztips, in case you're reading, KRUEGER HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH SATIRIZING THE SATAN COMMENTS) put together their satire and it ran, he would not have been fired.  

So, essentially, Krueger got fired because his colleagues made fun of Alou's absurd Satan comments.  KNBR management is a bunch of weak-ass panderers that treat their employees like cattle, and can't take a stand on anything.  Unless it benefits their bottom line.

A Beane in the hand is worth $60M in payroll

by jeepers on Aug 10, 2005 4:43 PM PDT reply actions  

Maybe Kreuger can call THE DOGHOUSE
and form a Bay Area Dj's who were fired club.

by theblackpearl on Aug 10, 2005 4:45 PM PDT reply actions  

I listen to kmel..
..in the mornings, I never really liked those guys. When/Why did they get fired?

by AllThingsOakland on Aug 10, 2005 5:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

HA HA HA!
I'll call up Mancow!
Make your own goddamn popcorn!

by malikot on Aug 10, 2005 7:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hearing the explanations
I can't really defend or minimize Krueger's comments.  He's a professional broadcaster and should have known better.

But what strikes me, after listening to KNBR and reading the papers, is the desperate effort to distance the Giants from all of this.

The Giants, we are told, didn't demand that Krueger be fired.  Shoot, even Alou wasn't demanding that.  It was all just an unlucky "confluence of events" - the Krueger comment, the morning show bit, the station sale, et cetera.

I do not like it when someone insults my intelligence.

The only reason the morning show sketch would have prompted anything is that KNBR management would have worried that Alou was going to use it to renew his attacks on the station, keeping the issue in the news.

Last I checked, Felipe Alou is a Giants employee.  The Giants could have told him to pipe down, that he had made his point already.  But they wouldn't or did not believe he would listen to them.

Alou and the Giants are being disingenuous.  Right now, he (and the team) should be saying: "Good.  A racist was fired, and I'm glad."  Instead, he and the Giants are dancing away from the whole thing, claiming they had nothing to do with it.  KNBR is telling the same story, but it doesn't hold up even if you believe their version of events.

The truth?  Alou wanted Krueger fired.  That's what the whole "messenger of Satan" thing on ESPN was about.  It was to turn up the heat, as was his decision not to accept Krueger's apology or meet with him.  The Giants wanted him gone too, both to support Alou and because he was an inconvenient dissenting voice (tolerable when he was bashing Dusty Baker, but not now).

The Giants are entitled to throw their weight around and dictate what happens on their flagship station.  They don't get to avoid responsibility.  These people were fired because of the Giants, period.

by bear88 on Aug 11, 2005 8:36 AM PDT reply actions  

Is the Giants' denial
about as convincing as a Rafael Palmeiro finger pointed emphatically straight at the camera? The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
Nico

by Nico on Aug 11, 2005 10:00 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Aperture_logo_small
Community Prospect List #4
Img_2672_small
Long-Term Outlook

Recent FanPosts

Fubarcloud_small
Wolf being told to spend money
Small
The wRC+ Challenge
Pumpkin_small
Maybe this is a stupid stats question
Small
A's reportedly sign Cespedes
Unknown_small
Is It Really Worth It: Three Veterans Who May Be Playing Oakland Next Year, But Shouldn't Be
Small
Manny's Contract
Small
fantasy baseball league for A's fans!
Small
NYY Proposal
Small
Roy Oswalt = opportunity

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Josefav2_small danmerqury

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late