Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

Looking ahead to the offseason

The diary formerly known as, "Is it game time already?" or "What the hell am I going to do all day until the game starts?"

Star-divide

Possibly the best part about this year's team is that nearly everyone is going to be back next year.  Let's quickly run down the 2006 roster and committed dollars:

SP Barry Zito 8.25
SP Rich Harden 1.00
SP Danny Haren 0.32
SP Joe Blanton 0.32
SP Kirk Saarloos 0.32

RP Huston Street 0.32
RP Justin Duchscherer 0.32
RP Kiko Calero 0.32
RP Joe Kennedy 3.00 (? ARB 6)
RP Juan Cruz 1.00 (?, ARB 5)
RP1
RP2

C Jason Kendall 11.00 (1.00 to PIT)
3B Eric Chavez 10.00
SS Bobby Crosby 0.75
2B Mark Ellis 0.60 (?, ARB 4)
1B Dan Johnson 0.32
DH
LF Bobby Kielty 1.5 (?, ARB 5)
CF Mark Kotsay 7.00
RF Nick Swisher 0.32

C Adam Melhuse 0.50 (?, ARB 4)
IF Keith Ginter 1.42
IF Marco Scutaro 0.32
OF Charles Thomas 0.32

$49.2 million total. Yabu and Witasick not retained. Payton probably not offered arbitration, too risky. Rincon you could maybe offer if you think he'll look elsewhere to get multiple years, he might be a Type B. Hatteberg's option not picked up at $2.75 million.

Anywhere that I've guessed the salary, I've placed a question mark; this is generally for the arbitration-eligible players. Remember, the salaries of arby players is primarily determined by their length of service... thus, ARB 5 players generally make a lot more than ARB 4 players just by virtue of the extra year.

Clearly, there are a few spots that appear to be question marks.
-Retaining Ginter and his $1.42 million salary looks horrible, but I doubt we can trade him.
-Likewise, Melhuse could easily cost closer to a million, making him an expensive backup catcher.
-Another year of carrying three 2B doesn't really make sense either.
-I'd imagine that Kirk Saarloos will be moved to the bullpen and Joe Kennedy will be given a chance to start again, but out of respect for the season Los Kirk is putting together, I'm leaving him in the rotation. No effect on salaries though.

The most conspicuous holes are at RP and DH, and isn't it a coincidence that we have two, fragile-elbowed, free-agent question marks currently rehabbing Tommy John surgery in Dotel and Durazo.

To offer arbitration, or not to offer arbitration, that is the question.

And, really, the answer seems pretty clear: at $49.2 million in committed payroll ($60 million budget), you've got to offer both of them arbitration. That is, assuming they'll be able to play come July or August next year... otherwise, this becomes a very difficult dilemma.

Let's assume for a second that both would rejoin the big league club sometime in June or July (before the trade deadline). If we offer arbitration, there are three possibilities:

-They accept, in which case they'd almost certainly be awarded 20% less than what they're making this year, which comes to $3.75 million each ($4.75 million * 0.8) and $7.5 million between the two of them.
-They decline arbitration and their value on the free agent market is high (high enough that we wouldn't try to sign them). We get 2 draft picks for each of them, 4 total. Yay.
-They decline arbitration thinking they can do better on the free agent market, but actually their value is low. We end up with a shot at resigning them and if we don't, 2 draft picks each.

Considering that we have the room under the budget, offering them arbitration gives you the best return on your assets (but which could potentially be lost for nothing). The only problem is you have to make do with replacements for the first half of the season while they are rehabilitating, and probably in-system players since you wouldn't be able to afford anyone else. In the bullpen, there are enough candidates at AAA:  Garcia, Flores, Rheinecker, Mabeus. DH is slightly more problematic. There's Jack Cust, Matt Watson or Brant Colamarino, but none of them are particularly great options. Daric Barton is unlikely to be ready by then and it might be dangerous to rush him. I suppose Billy could probably find someone to DH for a half season, there'll probably be a couple million to spare.

It'll be interesting to see what happens. Is it game time yet?

Comment 49 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

A few reactions
  1. I don't think it dangerous at all to rush Barton;
  2. i don't forsee Dotel or Durazo in the A's plans-- I'd much rather see them reup Witasick and Payton and keep Cruz. Kotsay is going to need a backup;
  3. Surely by now we've seen the value of Scutaro-- Ginter can be dumped.
oaktoon

by oaktoon on Aug 1, 2005 7:26 AM PDT reply actions  

God, I love this team.
independencefieldsac.org
Please help disabled kids in Sacramento play baseball by helping the Rivercats build a specially equipped field for them.

by kaweahkaweah on Aug 1, 2005 7:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

haha
I see some floggings for Salb once the feminine side of AN wakes up!
The face of a child can say it all, especially the mouth part of the face.

by JJ on Aug 1, 2005 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Good Post
I'm always interested in the future of this ballclub, both on the field and financially.  I'm sure BB has a similar "blueprint".

Anyways, with regards to Dotel and Durazo, I don't think it would be wise to offer them arbitration.  I don't see either of these guys getting even half of 3.75 Million on the open market.  I can't see BB taking a 7.5 Million Dollar bath on these two guys.  Too much depth in both scenarios (Bullpen - Duke, Calero, Witasick, Street, Garcia, Mabeus, etc.), and (1B/DH - Johnson, Barton, Swisher, any other person put in the DH Spot)

Does anyone have examples of players coming off of TJ or other surgeries, and signing the next year?  I remember Wade Miller got about 1 Million this year from Boston, but I'm not sure what his injury was.  

I would like to see Kennedy and Cruz battle for the #5 Spot in the rotation.  Saarloos is having an awesome year, but he might be even more valuable in the bullpen next season, alas, The Duke in 2004-2005.  And if Zito isn't re-Signable, Saarloos can step back into the fray.

Wow, this team looks rock solid.

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Aug 1, 2005 8:03 AM PDT reply actions  

Jon Lieber is the only comp I could find
He made 5.0 and 5.8 MM in 01 and 02.  He had TJ surgery in 02 and signed with the Yankees.

He rehabbed for all of 03, making 550 K, then pitched decently in 04, making 2.7 MM.

Dotel was making about 5 MM this year, right?  So the Lieber comparison is somewhat valid financially as well as structurally.

Fearing Mecir since 2000.

by salb918 on Aug 1, 2005 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

By the way
Nice diary, but be aware that rational analysis and logical reasoning won't get you anywhere.
Fearing Mecir since 2000.

by salb918 on Aug 1, 2005 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

Pardon my disbelief here...
I'm always interested in the future of this ballclub, both on the field and financially.

...but after rereading this post from you, I'm not sure where you stand. Is the wind really blowing from a different direction today?  

http://www.cafehayek.com ~ a blog for classical liberals

by LowcountryJoe on Aug 1, 2005 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

How?
How does that post make me not interested in the future of this ballclub?  Pre-Trade Deadline, I thought this team should continue to try to improve.  Post-Trade Deadline, I think this team should continue to do whatever it takes to try to win it all this year (Follow Players put on Waivers.  Make a trade to improve this ballclub, alas, Willie McGee in 1989).

You're obviously interested in my takes - Please tell me your thoughts (You haven't rebutted anything I've proposed).  Your attempts to downgrade me w/ shallow "Short Bus" put downs is completely disrespectful.

Also, please read this:

"I believe that a lot of people are letting the anonymity of online forum posting let them turn our fair community into an arena of bitter baseball snobs bantering about statistics. I know none of those people would act so aggressively eye to eye. There's just something about physical presence that allows people to be more courteous. So what I am asking all those people who said "that trade is ridiculous, have you even been watching??" and "Um...no. That makes no sense." to just pretend you are saying those things to a fellow A's fan at a local pub...and just be nicer." - WhiteElephantGuy

This quote is directed at AN'ers like yourself (IMO), and I couldn't have said it any better.  

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Aug 1, 2005 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

First of all,
that earlier post of yours compared with the newest one certainly does make you look like you're talking out of both sides of your mouth.  I don't see how any reasonable person comes to a different conclusion.  In fact, someone else on that very thread - if memory is serving correctly - takes you to task about mortgaging the future for the sake of the NOW.  [/sarcasm on] Check it, I believe it was my other alias that I use, 'Nico', [/sarcasm off] that says something to the effect about what do you do when 2006-2010 are the here and now.  I don't believe that you answered that post.

Secondly, I've already read that quote by WhiteElephantGuy because I've visited your AN Homepage as I was stalking you.  When did the WhiteElephantGuy write that?  It's pretty spot on.  It mirrors something I wrote too, or maybe I mirrored him.  It would be interesting to see who wrote what first.  Either way, it's true.  The difference in my case is that I would be crazy enough to say much of the stuff that I write while in your (or anyone else's) presence.  If you've ever read my comments for any great length, I do not often go out of my way to offend unless someone else is doing it or being critical.  In fact, I do a fair amount of ripping on myself.

Clearly though, you've flip-flopped regarding the organization's future and you did an awful lot of whining about the organization's lack of a recent championship.

http://www.cafehayek.com ~ a blog for classical liberals

by LowcountryJoe on Aug 1, 2005 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Last Word
You have clearly taken my words to heart.  If you think I have "flip-flopped", then that's your call.  

But again, you refuse to offer any insight to your beliefs.  I can only assume that you feel that this team should "Stand Pat".  And I disagree w/ that stance...

"if memory is serving correctly - takes you to task about mortgaging the future for the sake of the NOW" - That's flat-out wrong!  I have said on many posts that I understand that Cinncy was asking way too much for Adam Dunn - Read this....
 http://www.athleticsnation.com/comments/2005/7/26/4321/59960/67#67 - You, LBC, even responded w/ "Excellent Comment"

When I went on my little rant, I was asking BB/Macha & company to put the future aside for a moment (2 - 3 months)

  • There's no need talk about 2006-2010.  We should be doing what we can to win it all this year - I've never asked them to trade away the future, nor do I believe it to be the right thing to do, in most cases.
  • Macha has talked about not enough playing time - Who cares who is getting the playing time, as long as we are winning.
  • As for the other comments, lets just say I'm a little paranoid about past postseasons....9 friggin' series clinching losses!  What A's fan isn't paranoid???
You think I want to trade Keith Ginter, yet I'm not stupid enough to think that another ballclub would even consider taking him off our hands.  I wish the A's would have gotten a Matt Lawton -Type for the stretch run, and moved Keith Ginter to AAA.  This would have given this team another alternative to Kotsay/Kielty/Swisher/Payton (just in case someone gets hurt or starts slumping)...

If standing pat was your pre-trade deadline agenda, you obviously think Keith Ginter is valuable to this year's team (good luck charm, maybe?).

As for "flip-flopping":  If your opinions of this team have stayed steady throughout the 2005 Season...well then, you are a lyer.  

I'm sick of the pettiness some people show on this great website.  I would point the finger, but what's the use.  I think you know who I'm referring to, and their all AN Snobs - IMO.

And no, I don't believe you would say the following to my face, because if you did, there would be some serious problems...

"In short, think of me (or us) as someone who provides something that brings you satisfaction - sort of like the bus driver that you had in high school that would pull around to the inconspicuous location so that none of the other kids saw that the bus you rode wasn't quite as long as the others...the one that gave you a helmet and mouthpiece (even though you weren't on any team) so that the spasms against the window were blunted and hurt less.  Be kind in return, I (or we're) here for you son." - LBC

Anyways, I'm done.  Let's root on the A's, and agree to disagree.

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Aug 1, 2005 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

interesting
I think you're right on Dotel... people are desperate enough for relievers that we might get a pick for him... and if not... 3.75 ain't so bad for a late relief bridge for Street.  But I don't think we can offer arb. to Durazo... he probably won't pick up a bat 'till mid-late summer... that's just silly... no chance anyone offers him a contract... so we shouldn't either... we may get him for a minor league contract.
    I also foresee a move to the 'pen for Saarloos... but not to make room for Kennedy... BB is gonna give Cruz a shot to start... if Kennedy starts he'll have to beat out Blanton in spring training... seems unlikely.  Kennedy may prove to have a higher value as off-season trade bait than he did during the season... perhaps we could force someone to take Ginter by packaging them.  I also doubt that we ever see Chuck Thomas in Oakland again.  He'll be passed by Ethier, Watson and even Stanley.

by gorickeygo on Aug 1, 2005 8:07 AM PDT reply actions  

Ohad
I know this is off subject, but since this is a "recommended diary", where has username: Ohad, been?

Anyone?

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Aug 1, 2005 8:35 AM PDT reply actions  

Dotel
Chances are, if the A's don't offer him arby, he'll sign with another team.

HOWEVER, if the A's do offer him arby, he'll likely get a decent award, and he is just too risky to tie up a lot of money in. I think the A's should take the chance that he won't sign with another team, and then sign him when the become able to do so on May 1. He probably wouldn't be ready until at least then anyway. IMO he's too much of a risk to tie up more than a mil or two in.

Also, I don't foresee Saarloos in the rotation next year. Ideally, that spot would be taken by Meyer, with Saarloos working out of the pen. He'd be wicked in that role.

"He threw me a pitch I'd never seen before, Sexson said. The umpire asked me what it was, and I said, 'I don't know.' This guy throws ghost pitches.''

by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Aug 1, 2005 8:52 AM PDT reply actions  

every time
I think Saarloos can go in the pen, he throws a gem like yesterdays. Therefore, let's remember to think about him in the pen right before his next start...

It always seems like there are various A's that management has decided (probably using some statistical measures) are not THE GUY and they never quite give them the same chances they give THE GUY.  For instance, Swish, Crosby, Haren, Blanton and Kielty are THE GUYS. But Saarloos, Byrnes (please no comments), Duke, Scooter and DJ are all players who had to wait a little extra and fight a little harder to get a chance.

by Apricot on Aug 1, 2005 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Borrowed time
As much as I've been loving Saarloos, I can't help but wonder if he's pitching on borrowed time.  His shoulder was supposedly ready to fall off altogether last season, and I worry that it might flare up again.  That's why it's nice to have insurance policies like Duke/Meyer/Yabu/Kennedy/Cruz.

By the way, what the heck does "Cupcake Up" refer to?  Some sort of Joe Blanton allusion?

Fearing Mecir since 2000.

by salb918 on Aug 1, 2005 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Where have you been?
'Cupcake up' is IN!
Best Coliseum promotion of the year? 2005 Oakland A's baseball.

by baseballgirl on Aug 1, 2005 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

I thought ...
... "cupcake up" was a reference to Blanton needing a manssiere.
It's tough out there, Pootie. You got drugs ... crime ... gorillas ...

by monkeyball on Aug 1, 2005 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

The "chosen" Ones
I completely agree on that front. Sometimes I think they are right (Byrnes), sometimes I get frustrated (DJ). But in the end, things usually work out pretty well. I think Beane has been pretty good about recognizing quality play when he sees it, which is more than you can say for most GM's.

I Still think that Saarloos is not a long term starter. He's been great this year, and I (really) like the guy, but most of the time he can only go 5-6 innings. It takes aggressive teams that don't have a ton of speed to allow (Seattle, Detroit) to let him get deep into games. And one thing I find troublesome is that he has started to give up a lot more HR as the season has progressed. However, if he continues to put up QS the rest of this year and into next, feel free to say "I Told You So":)

"He threw me a pitch I'd never seen before, Sexson said. The umpire asked me what it was, and I said, 'I don't know.' This guy throws ghost pitches.''

by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Aug 1, 2005 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

Baseball Business
I don't think we're alone in this ....  Most First Rounders (High Rounders) get the majority of the attention, and always seem to get a fair shake.  Come to think of it, it's that way in the world of business as well - Harvard Graduate vs. Hayward State Graduate.

More than anything else, It's probably a GM/EGO thing.  

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Aug 1, 2005 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think it's an ego thing
As Billy Beane says, track record is important.  Minor leagues count as track record; so does college or juco experience.

Would you hire a Hayward grad over a Harvard grad?  Of course not.  If they had 15 years of professional experience and the Hayward grad was clearly superior, you would take him.  But all other things being equal, almost everybody would err on the side of the Hayward grad.

Fearing Mecir since 2000.

by salb918 on Aug 1, 2005 9:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Juan Cruz
Juan Cruz had a hiccup last night - Probably not a good night to do it, considering Saarloos' complete game yesterday:

Player         IP   H  R  ER  BB  SO  HR   ERA
Cruz (L, 3-1)  5.0  7  5  4   2   6   2    2.15

I know, not a big deal.  Just thought I'd share.

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Aug 1, 2005 8:53 AM PDT reply actions  

Meyer's Last Start
Pitcher          IP   H  R  ER  BB  SO  HR  ERA  
Meyer  (W, 2-6)  7.0  4  1  0   2   7   0   5.45  
Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Aug 1, 2005 9:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

Dont Forget Dan Meyer
If he stays healthy he probably has a good shot at the #5 spot in the Rotation also...

As far as the DH spot.. I think they may bring back Hatty at a reduced salary and find a right handed bat for him to Platoon with. You might be able to get Hatty and a right hander for the 2.7 that Hatty would have made..

Besides that I think the most interesting position is left field.. We'll see if Billy brings back Kielty or looks to improve in that area.. (not that Kielty isnt playing well.. but LF is probably the easiest area to improve the team)

Lastly, offering arbitration to Dotel & Durazo is not a good manuever.. There is no reason to pay upwards of 3 million to players who will only play half the season IF that.

A's Fan in Philly

by Duby on Aug 1, 2005 9:14 AM PDT reply actions  

It'll be Barton
He'll tear up Arizona in ST and the A's will look around and say: "he's ready. I know it screws up the arbitration clock, but he's ready."
oaktoon

by oaktoon on Aug 1, 2005 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

This thread in general
is making me even happier about this team.

Absolutely no better organization to root for in baseball

"He threw me a pitch I'd never seen before, Sexson said. The umpire asked me what it was, and I said, 'I don't know.' This guy throws ghost pitches.''

by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Aug 1, 2005 9:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

A Street-Esque Situation
With Barton... I personally would like to see him at AAA next year.. but if he tears up Spring Training he may have a chance to win the job at DH or in LF..

But I have to think Billy would bring in veterans at those positions, so Barton will have to "wow" the brass to make the squad..

but what do I know?

A's Fan in Philly

by Duby on Aug 1, 2005 9:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Barton
Oaktoon, I think you're right about Barton. I mean, Chavez's contract ends at 2010 and if Barton started in 2005, his arbitration would end at 2010 (unless he's a super two, which would cause it to end at 2009). Then, Billy can take Chavez's franchise- player contract and give it to Barton.

I know I'm assuming way too much and I could very well be wrong, but it is interesting timing.

"Street's 'sweetness' will do for now." -Billy Beane

by Roscoe Parrish on Aug 1, 2005 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wow
I cannot add. That is so scary.

If he started from day one on 2006, he would definitely be a super two, so he would end his arbitration in 2010 anyways.

"Street's 'sweetness' will do for now." -Billy Beane

by Roscoe Parrish on Aug 1, 2005 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

What is a "Super Two"?
I'm guessing if the 1st year is good enough, they have 1 less Arby year?
A's Fan in Philly

by Duby on Aug 1, 2005 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure
I believe the rule is that if you're in the top 20% of days served of the 5th year Arby players, then you become a free agent after that 5th year. I'm not exactly sure about the rule, but I know that it causes the player to serve one less Arby year.
"Street's 'sweetness' will do for now." -Billy Beane

by Roscoe Parrish on Aug 1, 2005 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

No
Being a "super two" causes a player to have one more year of arbitration eligibility (and one less year pre-arb), but doesn't affect when he becomes a free agent. A player is eligible for arbitration if he has 3 full years of service time or is in the top 17% of those with 2+ years. He is eligible for free agency after 6 or more full years. If he spends less than 20(?) days in the minors during a year, it still counts as a full year of service time, so teams can't just send a player down for one day to get around the rules.

In Barton's case, this means:
If he starts with the A's at the beginning of 2006, he'll be eligible for arbitration after the 2008 season (3 years), and for free agency after 2011 (6 years).
If he starts in May 2006, he'll still be eligible for arbitration after 2008 (super 2), but not eligible for free agency until after 2012 (6+ years).
If he starts in July 2006, he'll be eligible for arbitration after 2009 (3+), and for free agency after 2012 (6+).

I would think that even if Barton looks ready next spring, they'll send him down for a month in order to get an extra year down the road.

http://mlbplayers.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/pa/info/faq.jsp#arbitration

Welcome to AN/Tiger Beat

by andeux on Aug 1, 2005 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the Clarification
You learn something new everyday on AN
A's Fan in Philly

by Duby on Aug 1, 2005 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks
for the correction.
"Street's 'sweetness' will do for now." -Billy Beane

by Roscoe Parrish on Aug 1, 2005 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hatteberg
There is a club option in 2006 for 2.7 Million - What happens if the club decides not to pick up the club option (Which I think will happen)?  Can we rip up old contract, and start new?  Do we have to wait until May 1st to renegotiate?  

Personally, I don't think it's in the best interest to keep Hatteberg on this team past this year?  There have to be better/younger options out there for 1B/DH/Backups (DJ & Swisher will occupy about 90% of the playing time at 1B in 2006)...

How about spending 5-Million on a RH/OF-DH Power Hitter?  

  • Kevin Mench
  • Rondell White
  • Juan Encarnacion
Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Aug 1, 2005 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

They're gone
I don't it makes sense to offer arbitration to either player.  Dotel won't be able to pitch until the middle of next season, if then.  Durazo is slightly more plausible, but only if the A's would get enough for him as a departing free agent.  And that is doubtful.  An injury-prone designated hitter with one good full season in his career?  I don't think teams will be lining up.  (They may be happy to sign him for next to nothing, but that wouldn't help the A's.)

by bear88 on Aug 1, 2005 9:21 AM PDT reply actions  

Nice Post Jay!
   Dotel, sounding somewhat ashamed for not being his best said, in principle, he would come back and contribute as a set-up man for Street. This would be a steal and really make next year's bullpen tough on everybody. His price would be right. Let's just see if he keeps his word.

   Same thing with Durazo, he offers depth, but in his case he's too limited in that he IS a defensive liability wherever he would play.I'm not convinced BB will want him. What happens with Hatteberg will be the telling factor. If his option is picked up, then I suspect Durazo may be out.

   Beane may view Barton as he did Chavez, stick him in LF and let him grow into his potential. He apparently displays enough plate discipline. He won't be one of 4 rookies making the contributions of this year's group, thus less pressure on him. He would also have grizzled veterans such as Crosby and Swisher around for guidance.

by Gerard on Aug 1, 2005 10:04 AM PDT reply actions  

Let me throw a name out there
This guy got paid 5 MM last year, 6 MM this year.  He's out for the year with an injury, is at the tail end of a good career, and represents a substantial injury risk.  He's got good patience, a whole lot of power, and he's right-handed.  He is unlikely to re-up with his current team and might be looking for a job.

Folks, I'm talking about FRANK THOMAS.  

It's almost unconscionable that he's been playing for so cheap.  Wonder if this thought has crossed Beane's mind.

Fearing Mecir since 2000.

by salb918 on Aug 1, 2005 10:10 AM PDT reply actions  

no way
Huge injury risk.
oaktoon

by oaktoon on Aug 1, 2005 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think ...
... the Big Skirt has a player option for '06. Given his fragile bones, odds are he'll exercise it.
It's tough out there, Pootie. You got drugs ... crime ... gorillas ...

by monkeyball on Aug 1, 2005 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

hey,
what doesn everyone think BB will do over the offseason as far as trades are concerned?  My prediction: he trades two of the following for a power bat and a prospect (or draft pick): Sarloos, Kennedy, Cruz, Ginter.  I see this as a surplus and shortage thing.  We have a surplus of quality starters and middle infielders while we have a shortage of power (although not of late). getting a true power hitter could solve our potential DH question.  Also, with Meyer slitting throats in the minors, he could be brought up next year as a possible starter, or if needed, a middle releiver (if we get rid of kennedy, he could fill that niche). thoughts?

by SLOtown on Aug 1, 2005 12:27 PM PDT reply actions  

Power bats
are supposed to be a rare commodity. Cheap power bats even more so (BB is not going to break the bank unless maybe we can't work out an extension with Zito and he is traded). A couple of 5th starters ain't going to do it (eg Reds apparently wanted Harden for Dunn).

As for Ginter. Because of his salary he has no trade value. 3rd string 2B hitting .168 making over a million dollars rarely do.  

by Larry E on Aug 1, 2005 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sure, but....
this does nothing to reduce the log jam in the rotation.  A's basically have 8 SP for 5 spots.  You've got to believe that Billy is going to trade at least one (if not more) of them in the offseason.  For my money, I bet he spins Saarloos off for promising young talent, maybe a corner outfielder with power.

by BruceBochte on Aug 1, 2005 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ok...
My two cents...
  • Payton, Witasick: stay (Good Outfielder, power reliever, Period.)
  • Jairo, Kennedy, Saarloos, Cruz one of them is gone (probably two)for a power young RH OF (Jonny Gomes?)
  • Hatty: stays (Beane loves him, Period.)
  • Kielty: gone (we will keep Payton, Mash Lefties  
like Kielty, BETTER Outfielder, we can platoon Hatty and the RH we get in the DH spot)
  • Rincon: gone (Rheinecker and Flores will be the next year Kennedy-Rincon)
  • Ginter, Scutaro and Ellis: all stay (Scutaro and Ellis are very importany for this team and nobody will take Ginter)

by Olijerez77 on Aug 1, 2005 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was interested in BB's comments
when he said teams asked him about Kennedy and he told them "no way".  If that is the case this year why would you think he would trade him next year.  Remember how the A's got Sarloos?  We traded a guy named Harville who was supposed to be our closer of the future, and when we did, Tim Hudson was pissed.  Sarloos had been injured and it seemed like a nothing deal, well, Sarloos has been very good despite what I sometimes read on AN.  BB sees something in Kennedy and I imagine right now YOung is working with him on mechanics, I believe he is in BB's plan, a left hander who gets people out.  Don't be so sure about Meyer being up next year, one good start does not a major leaguer make.  I do think Cruz is gone.  Hatte will be back, he is BB's kind of player, we won't pick up the option but what option does Hatte have?  Same with Durazo.
But I doubt we can offer arbitration, our great hope is that we can let them go and resign them for a reasonable salary.

by china bob on Aug 2, 2005 1:49 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A's relocation option from a legal expert on the issue
Oakland_athletics_team_logo_photofile_small
Prospects 1Q Report

Recent FanPosts

Small
Gotta Be Their Pitching
Hardly-boys_small
Minor League notes on Major League Day Off
Small
Cespedes Upate?
Small
The SF Warriors, the LA Raiders and the Oakland A's
Photo__11__small
COG #17 - Yankees vs. Athletics or Spank me! Spank me!
100_1536_small
What to do? What to do?
Small
Fans Should Buy the A's
Reg3_small
Tom Milone's Nickname
Small
Reality and random thoughts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Sb_nation1_small ahhall

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late