What offensive woes?
According to the stats provided by this fine website, the A's have only scored 4 less runs than the Garden Grove Losers of Southern California.
Now in the greater scheme of things this stat means little. However, when the corpulent mouth of John Kruk or the A'S-hating mouth of Reynolds constantly praise the Angels as one of the better offensive teams while at the same time denouncing the A's O, this stat serves as some form of vindication.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Um ...
And I have a bad feeling that we are on the cusp of an offensive trough/regression-to-mean, what with Chavvy and Crotchby coming down with a case of the swingies, Kotsay suffering from bat dropsy, and Kendall's grounders going to shallow short instead of deep short.
dont look now...
by giocatoli on Jul 22, 2005 6:52 PM PDT reply actions
11 tonight.
They're fine.
Think of the past few games-- little from their #1, #2 or #4 hitters-- but Swisher, hatteberg, Ellis, Johnson, Kielty, Crosby and particularly Payton all stepped up.
Since the beginning of June
by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Jul 22, 2005 9:31 PM PDT reply actions
one encouraging sign
I think that...
And how about Ellis? He looks so much better at the plate this year than in 2003.
...you're really on to something here. Ellis is doing his thing and he's doing it rather well albeit, in an under-the-radar way.
If one really looks at it honestly, there really doesn't appear to be such a huge and glaring hole at 2B after all.
by LowcountryJoe on Jul 23, 2005 6:52 AM PDT up reply actions
It's not even about the offense..
by fadedash on Jul 23, 2005 12:33 PM PDT reply actions

by 






















