Or Ratto reads AN and changes mind about A's. Either way:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/07/15/RATTO.TMP&type=as
As someone already commented, it seems that he takes our collective ambivalence about the trades to mean that we didn't have passion for Byrnes (which I don't think is true for either Byrnes lovers or haters), but otherwise great article.
Plus, he totally mentions AN!
If I didn't know better...I'd swear one of us snuck in and wrote it.
Good job, Ray. :)