Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Four TCU Football Players Among 17 Arrested In Drug Ring

Talking You Down

Please just stop.  Back away slowly from the edge.  It isn't worth it.  Seriously.

I get as frustrated as the rest of you at this team, but you have to take a moment to exhale and look at the positives.

This team is one game back of the division lead with our number three and four hitters representing a black hole on offense.  The team is currently afflicted with RISP Disease.  It only seems to rear it's head in key situations, but that's what makes it so deadly.  Our top three RBI guys bat 1, 2 and usually seventh in the order.

But ultimately, every single team in the AL West is flawed.  Seriously flawed.

The Angels starting pitching is suspect and their offense outside of Guerrero hasn't been much better (think they are already longing for Glaus and Guillen, especially the way both have started with their new teams?).  The Rangers have taxed their bullpen beyond belief because of their weak starting pitching.  The Mariners also have a rotation with some holes in it.

If anything, look at how our young starting pitching is performing:

  • Haren - 2.37 ERA, 1.16 WHIP
  • Blanton - 2.04 ERA, 0.96 WHIP
  • Harden - 0.68 ERA, 0.98 WHIP
Barry Zito has the worst stats of the rotation.  Now, I imagine the kids will come back down to earth a little once the league catches up to them.

Remember, Beane is watching this team closely and realizes it has holes.  In a division filled with parity, it might take just one or two key players to help put a team over the top.  Billy knows this.

So even though we have a leader that is battling mental demons right now and a left fielder who couldn't take the proper route to a ball if he was strapped to the back a golden retriever, just have a little patience.  

Chavy will come around eventually.  You just have to know someone is miserably off his game if he can't protect against a fastball right down the pipe, 3-2 with the bases loaded.

But part of me wonders, at least until he gets his swing back, is it time to put him fifth or sixth in the order and go with Kotsay in the three-hole?  Just until he starts to get the confidence back.

I realize that probably isn't going to happen because players need to work through these things.

It's possible Durazo got a little bit of the feel back tonight with that bomb off of Guardado and he's been hitting better lately, starting in Texas.  The problem is that you can whatever you want to with this lineup right now, but too many guys aren't hitting.  I mean, judging from the way the players are hitting, you'd need to go with Ellis, Scutaro and Kotsay as your top three hitters and we know that isn't going to happen.

But my point is, keep your heads high, folks.  Everyone hits a slump now and then and in my opinion, it's better Chavy hit it out of the gate than later in the season.

So relax, take a deep breath and repeat after me, "We're not even a tenth into the season.  We're not even a tenth into the season."

Comment 197 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

thanks Blez
it's very late where I am and I have a big work day later today, but I got so upset that I've been staying up listening to Buan (the mlb.com audio feed is fine for him, just screws up during the game).

Everybody let's remember it's April 20. And we need our sleep.

I'm glad you're all there to vent with.

by OaklandSi on Apr 20, 2005 10:42 PM PDT reply actions  

So true Blez....Well said.
Although I seriously doubt Anaheim is missing Glaus and his .220 average.
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Apr 20, 2005 10:43 PM PDT reply actions  

Maybe his 5 HRs...
A good cigar is like a beautiful chick with a great body who also knows the American League box scores.

by baseballgirl on Apr 21, 2005 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

My thoughts on the game
(Blez, hope it's ok to repost this--you put up this new thread seconds after I posted the following on the game thread...)

*    First off, I am firmly in the camp of people who believe Chavy's last AB was unacceptable for the situation. The 3-2 pitch was not only a clear strike, but it was the only pitch one would expect in that situation--fastball away. Down 2, where a walk leaves it up to the next guy, you have to be swinging at any strike and anything borderline. I really believe Macha should give him tomorrow off to clear his head.

{Personal note to vacaville: I'm not a "homer"; I call 'em as I see 'em. What I never do is "trash" players; if you interpret that as being "always backing all the players," well...do what you want, I suppose.}

*    What bothers me most are inconsistencies, and there were two tonight:

 1. Byrnes was in LF for the ill-fated play, rather than a defensive replacement (e.g., Thomas), presumably to keep his bat in the lineup. Yet Byrnes was lifted for a pinch hitter in the 8th (ironically for Kielty to bat from his weaker side). Either Byrnes should have been out of the game by the bottom of the 7th or he should have hit in the 8th.

 2. Rincon was up, but was not called in to face any of 3 lefties. Surely, he wasn't up for Ichiro, because by the time Ichiro came up, the M's would have to have at least a 2-run lead already. I'm guessing Macha was worried about a pinch-hitter for the pinch-hitter, and that Rincon would wind up facing a righty (only thing I can think of), but then don't bother to have him up.

 IMO, poorly managed game (by a decent manager), "key players" (Zito, Chavy) not there when needed; not good enough to pitch well once the damage is done, or to stand, passively, for a decisive AB that needs a game-tying hit.

Nico

by Nico on Apr 20, 2005 10:43 PM PDT reply actions  

Agreed...
I agree totally Nico. Tonight's game WAS very poorly managed. And i think it shows a lack of confidence in Rincon that Macha didn't have come in to face those lefties. The mariners don't have a single decent right-handed bat on the bench to counter that move. As for the Byrnes fiasco i'd add one thing as well..did anyone else notice how deep the guy was playing against a left handed hitter with little pop to the opposite field?
Knowing Byrnes propensity for bad jumps i'd say that was horrendous positioning at a critical time in the game.
You also hit the nail on the head with the word "passive". Slumps are a fact of life but you can't get a key hit without swinging the damn bat. He's supposed to be THAT guy..the one we WANT up there in that situation. Tonight (and just about every other night recently) i'd have rather had anyone else up there with the game in the balance. Ok..maybe not ANYONE..anyone else but Chavy or Bobby "feel that breeze" Kielty.

by FabulousG on Apr 20, 2005 11:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

If
Byrnes was playing too deep then the A's coaching staff should have moved him in. I would guess that the real problem was that the OF was playing the left handed hitting Dobbs to pull and he blooped one the opposite way. Everthing seems to be Byrnes' fault these days.

by Larry E on Apr 21, 2005 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Positives
although this was the most frustrating game so far this season, there were tons of positives. kotsay, swisher, ellis and scoot were awesome. durazo finally hit his first homerun after ten years. ichiro struck out twice against our pitchers!
confucius says "baseball is wrong; man with four balls cannot walk."

by gotgreen on Apr 20, 2005 10:43 PM PDT reply actions  

You Are Right
I agree with many of your points Blez. They still almost won this game despite the miscues.
I said at the beginning of the season it would be a roller coaster ride.

I do want to scold some of the more vocal Chavez bashers. Sure he is blowing rhino at the plate right now, but he has always been a streaky type of hitter.

I am sure he is as frustrated (if not more) than us fans. The guy worked his tail off to become a Gold Glover and (at least last season) has started to figure out how to hit lefties better.

Give the guy a break and wait to pronounce his sentence after a full month of games at least.

by RudiFan on Apr 20, 2005 10:44 PM PDT reply actions  

Every game reminds me
that Miguel Tejada is the one we should have kept. 0-15 is fine, [you know who im talking about] will always be at his worst in pressure situations. See, how much I lower my expectations of [him]

But having another error or misplay that costs his pitcher is not worth 10+ million dollars to me.

by suggy on Apr 20, 2005 10:45 PM PDT reply actions  

0-15
is his batting avg in RISP. Just to clear up any confusion

by suggy on Apr 20, 2005 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Before the Byrnes muff,
Chavez threw in the dirt to 1st. A halfway decent throw would have gotten us out of the inning (though it woulda been close).

by Checkswing HR on Apr 20, 2005 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Watched the play back on Tivo...
He short armed the throw like he was worried about throwing it away...It was very tentative....really a strange throw from a great fielder.
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Apr 20, 2005 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

BUT
If we are taling about the same play, it was a tough play for Chavie to field in the first place.  Byrnes'play was comparatively easy.
"Put a Milo on him."
-Billy Beane

by kaweahkaweah on Apr 20, 2005 11:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Easy?
Sure.....to give up 2 runs...no one would have caught that ball except maybe Ichiro or Carl Crawford.
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Apr 20, 2005 11:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

He didn't have to catch it
Let it bounce, throw it in, minimize the damage to one run.  It was clearly uncatchable.  I doubt that Ichiro would've tried to make that play.  

We all love Byrnes for his enthusiam, but once in awhile, it bites him in the ass.  It happened tonight.

"Put a Milo on him."
-Billy Beane

by kaweahkaweah on Apr 20, 2005 11:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

There were 2 outs....
The runners were going...that was two runs no matter what for sure.
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Apr 20, 2005 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes
A runner on second will go to third, but not necessarily go home.
"Put a Milo on him."
-Billy Beane

by kaweahkaweah on Apr 20, 2005 11:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

If a runner is running on contact...
Hes gonna score on a single..especially a bloopy one like that.  That was 2 runs for sure....

Either way...tonight sucked. :-(

Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Apr 20, 2005 11:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

You guyz
crack me up... 2 runs score on that play. Byrnes has a noodle for an arm.

by oakwin2004 on Apr 21, 2005 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

2 runs is better than 3
Wouldn't 2 runs have meant Durazo's home run ties the game?

by Donner on Apr 21, 2005 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

No, 2 runs
means it's 7-5 going to the 8th. Different game, who knows what happens from there...
Nico

by Nico on Apr 21, 2005 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

thanks
I have been waiting for someone to realize that the game is played differently every situation. Too many "what if" posts out there.
Let's Go Oakland!

by AllThingsOakland on Apr 21, 2005 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

And yea..Chavy's was very tough...
I just thought the throw was very strange and unlike him..it was a very tentative throw as if he just didnt want to make a mistake.
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Apr 20, 2005 11:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's the thing about Chavez
It isn't just throwing away at-bats in key situations. He's cost us two straight games with poor plays in the field. Unacceptable for a franchise player who is supposed to be a gold glove fielder.

by jmoney on Apr 21, 2005 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not an easy play
It was not an easy play at all. Few if any LFs would have made the catch. Perhaps he should have played it safe and concede two runs (even Vladdy wouldn't have had a play at home on an opposite field bloop like that with two out so it would have been two runs for sure) but it is very easy to say that now knowing that he didn't catch it and knowing that the A's scored 2 more runs. I get the feeling that if he had done this and we went on to lose 6-5 people would have been giving him grief for not making an attempt at the ball on a play that ultimately cost us the game.

by Larry E on Apr 21, 2005 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

I want to see Byrnsie
strapped to the back of a golden retriever.

Thanks :-)

by green star oakland on Apr 20, 2005 10:45 PM PDT reply actions  

Golden retriever
I have often compared Byrnes to having a golden retriever in left field,so maybe having two of them might help.

by EgolikeRickey on Apr 21, 2005 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

my puppy
is part lab, part golden and she cannot track a ball in flight to save her life.  Tons of enthusiasm for running after the ball, but she invariably heads in completely the wrong direction.  Strapping Eric Byrnes to my Bronte will only compound the problem.  Nice image, though, Blez.  Thanks for making me smile.

by batgirl on Apr 21, 2005 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not drinking the Kool-Aid tonight.
This team has had RISP disease for over two years, and I'm sorry, but Billy Beane is going to have to trade for half of a new team to fill the holes in this lineup.

by jmoney on Apr 20, 2005 10:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Stop being such an apologist!
Blez, you've raised good points, but you're coming across as such an apologist. It reminds me of listening to a Raiders game where the broadcasters try and put a positive spin on a huge loss. They say stuff like, "The Raiders were dominating in their 42-0 defeat at the hands of the Chiefs. The score doesn't reflect how well these men battled." Let people vent. We're not the GM, which is probably a good thing because otherwise some people would choose batting orders based on how cute the players are.

by farawaya on Apr 21, 2005 6:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

The sad fact is
When Mark Ellis is hitting 6th in the lineup, you've got problems.

by Jeff in Seattle on Apr 20, 2005 10:48 PM PDT reply actions  

This post says it all...
though kudos to Ellis for his solid performance so far.

by boilerdan on Apr 21, 2005 5:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Macha
HE is reallh handcuffed with the injuries to Calero, and to a lesser extent Cruz.  Street would not have been in if not for the injuries.  And the way you guys b**ch about Rincon, it was him or Street.  HE didn't bring Duke in at that time sice they were tied, and we were looking at possible extra innings

by theblackpearl on Apr 20, 2005 10:49 PM PDT reply actions  

couple other analytical thoughts
In the learning process, Street needs to focus on two things:
  1. It's fantastic that he throws so many strikes, but he does need to make his 0-2 pitches less hitable. The one to Beltre was a "good pitch" but was also too hitable for the count.
  2. Street will (as Fosse perceptively noted) need to focus more on the inner half of the plate than the outer half vs. lefties. Like Bradford's greatest success to lefties has come running the frisbee slider in on the hands, Street needs to find the down and in spot. The outer half will not be his friend vs. lefties.
Seems like a quick learner; I'm sure he'll figure both these things out sooner rather than later.
Nico

by Nico on Apr 20, 2005 10:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Can u guys even imagine how Beane reacts
to some of these AB's?  Must drive him freaking nuts.....
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Apr 20, 2005 10:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Byrnes has consistently made poor plays this year.
I don't remember Byrnes misplaying this many balls last year. What's going on?

Was Street charged with one earned run, or three? If he was charged with three, then official scorers are officially certifiable.

The hits Street did give up were all weakly hit.

It's so ironic that, going into the season, I expected all the young arms to get pounded and the offense to be at about the same level as last year. I mean, it's a huge irony how things have worked out in the first three weeks. The performance of our pitching bodes real well for the future.

by Checkswing HR on Apr 20, 2005 10:52 PM PDT reply actions  

How wouldnt it be 3?
There's no error when you dive like that.
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Apr 20, 2005 11:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

The error mau not be in the dive, but in
allowing the ball to get by you.

Look at it from the pitcher's perspective. Did Huston pitch as badly as a typical pitcher who gives up 3 runs in a single inning?

by Checkswing HR on Apr 21, 2005 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

ur right, man
the season IS still young. chavez isnt gonna hit .200 with 10 hrs this year. zito isnt gonna go 0-15 with a 7.50 ERA. yea, our 2 veteran leaders look lost, confused, frustrated and unconfident right now. but it wont last.

chavvy is strugglin big time right now. everyone here at AN no that. he looks afraid at the plate, like he doesnt know whether to be patient or aggressive. thats why half the time, he strikes out and other times he swings at the first pitch and pops up to lefts field. he looks overmatched by fastballs that really arent that fast. he swings blindly at pitches tailing away and thinks hes taller than he really is when he swings at a pitch at his eyes. i think blez is right. until he  regains his confidence he shold be moved down. his slump shouldnt be costing us ballgames.

as for zito, im not ready to write him off yet. yea he looked abysmal in the first inning today. he was nowhere near the zone and his changeup wasnt working in the beginning. but after that first inning, he did put up five straight 0's. i've been patient with him and im not gonna give up on him. hes only 27 years old and i still believe he can prove to us that 2004 was the abberration, not the 01-03. hes too young and talnted to just flame out. even if he continues to dissapoint every time he starts, im still just gonna suck it up and say " yea, he wasnt all that today. but, he'll get'em next time i know he will" because hes done so much for us over the years that it wouldnt be fair to trash talk him after every rough start. until beane thinks its time to trade him, i'll always look forward to barry zitos starts because i have a confidence he'll do well, no matter how many times he dissapoints us.

man that was long....my longest post ever. sorry if it bored anyone but i just wanted to say what i had on my mind

by OakT0wnB0rNnRaZed on Apr 20, 2005 10:56 PM PDT reply actions  

Question
If we temporarily move Chavez down in the order does Mark Ellis become the clean-up hitter (ha). Would break up the 3 lefties ... Durazo, Ellis, Hatteberg (hmmm)???

by Larry E on Apr 21, 2005 4:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's a rebuilding year
We should temper our expectations. Even though we're showing promising signs with so many young guys, we're basically over achieving.

by kvn on Apr 20, 2005 10:58 PM PDT reply actions  

can't agree there
I don't think we're overachieving, I think we're achieving right where we should. Flashes of brilliance and promise, too many flaws to string wins together, frustrating but entertaining.

We'll contend if/when we get better over time and no one runs away with it, both of which could totally happen, we'll see.

Nico

by Nico on Apr 20, 2005 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Isn't it ironic? Dontcha think?
That the young unproven guys have perhaps overachieved so far,while the "givens" have mostly sucked? If you had told me a month ago that Swisher would be hitting timely bombs and playing great D and that the young starters were ALL pitching well i'd have expected more than a 7-8 record at this point. Time for the vets to step up. There are gonna be times when THEY are gonna have to carry the young guys. I admit that from what i saw tonight..that thought scares me.

by FabulousG on Apr 20, 2005 11:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Blez, I totally agree...
But in the meantime, I reserve the right to scream and curse at the TV whenever Chavie ks with the bases loaded, or Byrnes makes such an utterly bone-headed play.
"Put a Milo on him."
-Billy Beane

by kaweahkaweah on Apr 20, 2005 11:05 PM PDT reply actions  

Zito gave up 4 runs in his first start,
8 runs in his second start, so I did an elaborate multivariate quadratic linear regression and concluded that he would give up 16 runs in his third start, 32 runs in his fourth start, and 2,147,483,648 runs in his last start in September.

Then Zito was lights out last Friday. So it's back to the drawing board!

Wait! He gave up 2 runs last Friday and 4 runs tonight, so that means 8 runs next Monday, 16 runs the Saturday after that ...

... looks like I need to pack it in for the night ...

by Checkswing HR on Apr 20, 2005 11:07 PM PDT reply actions  

So you're saying
that Zito is very even. That's odd. Well no, it can't be, can it?
Nico

by Nico on Apr 20, 2005 11:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

CHAVY DESERVES NO SYMPATHY
I was at the game tonight and it was obvious that Chavez was scared. What was worse than the called strike three was the called strike two. The man wants no piece of ANY KIND of pressure and wants to hand it off to others.

When one signs the biggest contract in a small market team's history, he should be willing to take the pressure.

WE, as fans have A RIGHT to demand more of Chavez and bitch about it until he comes through. Let's cut the postivie vibe crap about Chavy, PLEASE?

I agree that there are MANY positives about this season (e.g., young pitchers, the bottom and top of our order, the bullpen) and I am excited about this team, but I am PISSED and EMBARRASED about Chavez' play.

The fact is that this is not new for Chavy. Macha needs to drop him in the order until he figures something out.

Can you believe that Chavy was bitching about hitting behind Durazo this spring????

Sack up Chavy. We have had enough. Stop wasting the payroll.

P.S. Macha -- why no LOOGY (Rincon) for the lefties that Hargrove trotted out there???

by Josh @ Athletics Nation on Apr 20, 2005 11:21 PM PDT reply actions  

Hes terrible right now....no doubt
But it is a long season......Let's see where he's at July 1st..I bet it is a whole lot better and back in line with the player we know he is.
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Apr 20, 2005 11:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but that' s missing the point
Every single person on here understands that he'll eventually start hitting. What only some seem to understand is that Chavez will never put a full dominant season together...the kind of season you get paid $66 million to produce. If we have to put up with this bullshit until July 1st, we'll be 10 games out, and then BB will start unloading dudes- BECAUSE WE CAN'T AFFORD TO PAY ANYONE DUE TO CHAVVY'S CONTRACT.
I'll try not to swear.

by Tony on Apr 20, 2005 11:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly.
Chavy eats up the majority of the payroll and he must live with the pressure of producing. The A's don't have $$$ to make contract mistakes. We do not have flexibility for Chavy to underproduce.

by Josh @ Athletics Nation on Apr 20, 2005 11:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly
In the end, Chavvy will put together a crazy streak where he hits everything in sight - has multi-homer games, pads his numbers.  But this team missed the playoffs by one game.  "It's early", yes - but these games count!  What frustrates me with Chavez and Zito is that we had to suffer through all those stories and interviews in ST where these guys recognized that they now need to take leadership roles, etc.  Well, neither one of these guys is a leader or a guy you count on at the crucial moment.  Give me Harden on the mound and Kotsay at the plate.

by boilerdan on Apr 21, 2005 5:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Chavy is a head case...
...there, I said it. Read every quote of his, observe his body language, and check out his stats in pressure situations -- late innings of close games, 2 outs with RISP, etc. He simply isn't a gamer, and likely won't ever be. Jeter may bat .200 for 6 weeks, but will still manage to win a few games with timely hits and uncannily timed defensive gems.

Sure, our tunes will change somewhat when he hits .375 with 10 dongs in July, but even most of that production will happen with the A's up or down by 4 runs or more.

FWIW, I thought signing Chavy and letting Miggy go was the right thing to do.

On another note, Ruby's first torrid stretch of hitting will almost certainly precipitate a quick trade and DJ promotion. Unfortunately, the teams in most dire need of a slugging DH are all in the West.

by Oakland East on Apr 21, 2005 7:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Crosby
The decision to keep Chavez and let Miggy go had a lot to do with the fact that the A's had Crosby coming up. (And possibly that Chavez and Beane went to the same high school.)

by Larry E on Apr 21, 2005 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Put it another way:
The bad call on the 3-1 pitch is a break for the A'S if Chavy lines the 3-2 pitch to left-center...
Nico

by Nico on Apr 21, 2005 8:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Lame excuse but...
The pitch just before the called strike two was a ball and they were almost in exact locations.  The ump was pretty inconsistent with the strike zone on that AB.  However, I agree that Chavez should have at least swung at one of them because taking a called strike 3 is a chance you can't afford to take.

by keNbO on Apr 21, 2005 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

couple nights ago i mentioned
Kotsay would look good in the 3 hole right now to produce runs...problem is the 2 spot...maybe Ellis
"What's the ugliest part of your body...some say your nose, some say your toes, but i think it's your MIND." - Mothers of Invention

by redclay22 on Apr 20, 2005 11:34 PM PDT reply actions  

Kotsay in the 3-hole
might not have anyone to drive in. Unless he's allowed to lead-off, too, and ghost run.
Nico

by Nico on Apr 21, 2005 8:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

I missed the game
to find these marvelous straight-from-the-subconscious-to-your-door threads about the game.  When I checked out the box score, my main question was how much Street blew it.

The funny thing about baseball is when your team loses, it feels like they'll never win a game, and when they win, it feels like they can't lose.  In reality, we're going to lose at least 60 more games, and probably 70-80 more.

I'm taking the long view on this. I want Street to mature and find his feet, I want Haren to get Hudson-like, I want BoCro to come back and be solid. I want Calero to be healthy and come back nasty. I want Cruz to find his head and be average.

I want Zito to pitch somewhat above league-average, so he can be traded for something good.

And just maybe, if we're hanging around in contention in August, we can make a good run at this thing.

Oh yeah, i want Barton to start pummeling the ball in the minors and become and excellent 1B.  And a pony. And to have Beane, Forst, and Huston Street to bring us all Garlic Fries on AN Day 2.0 either on the terrace or in the lot.

Having said, that, Chavy has looked terrible. He needs a day off and maybe to go into the 5 spot.

by Apricot on Apr 20, 2005 11:45 PM PDT reply actions  

street didn't blow it
the box score may not reflect this, but chavez and byrnes blew it for him.

by xbhaskarx on Apr 21, 2005 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is it just me?
Is it just me or were Duchscherer and Street twins separated at birth?:)

by mrlebowski79 on Apr 21, 2005 12:23 AM PDT reply actions  

it's you
I don't think they look that much alike.

then again, I've met Duke so I've seen him up close. From very far away perhaps they do look more alike.

by OaklandSi on Apr 21, 2005 4:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

My spouse would not agree
When Huston Street first appeared on our TV screen I had to listen to "who is THAT?  Where did HE come from?  Tell me MORE about him..."

Duke doesn't get that reaction.

by boilerdan on Apr 21, 2005 5:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

The Grass is Always Greener on the Other Side
Tejeda plays in a park that is notoriously famous for producing gaudy power #'s for Right Handed batters.

Chavez is an offensive monster who will find his stroke.  His April #'s are always terrible, and I still like the combination we have at 3rd with Crosby/Chavez over Tejeda/Teahen (by far)

by idriveabucket on Apr 21, 2005 3:50 AM PDT reply actions  

Unbelievable
It's like riots in the streets. Why don't you and the rest of your buddies get some pitchforks and hang Billy Beane publicly?

IT'S TWO MOTHER F***G WEEKS INTO THE SEASON!!!!

Kielty, rejuvenated by his new genetically created St.Pats Day/Oktoberfest, shows us why Billy and Ohad are geniuses.

by ohad on Apr 21, 2005 3:58 AM PDT reply actions  

Here here!!!
Put away the fire folks, it's APRIL 21st!!! We have a long way to go this season! Two weeks does not a season make!

*sigh*

by gigglingone on Apr 21, 2005 8:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

I've been caught up in riots in the streets
and, ohad, this was no riot in the streets.

Also:

(i) when you want to suggest that people might calm down, it helps to model it yourself.

(ii) the only words in the English language that fit "F***G" are fling, flong and flung; so that's "TWO MOTHER FLUNG WEEKS" then ?

by green star oakland on Apr 21, 2005 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, lol
I noticed this afterwords.  

I guessi should say this, but i wasn't actually screaming. I wasn't like raving mad. It's hard to explaing, you know someone is like kinda "frustrated" and they say for crying out loud, thats what i was doing.

Kielty, rejuvenated by his new genetically created St.Pats Day/Oktoberfest, shows us why Billy and Ohad are geniuses.

by ohad on Apr 21, 2005 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

a "flong" is...
...the piece of cloth stuck between yor teeth when you use yor girlfriend's thong for flossing.

look it up in webster's...geesh!

"Hey Ho Let's Go!"- The 2005 A's, kickin' some ass.

by bigelephant on Apr 21, 2005 5:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, of course.
I always assumed it stood for Ferrance Long.
Nico

by Nico on Apr 21, 2005 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

A flong
is a papier mache imprint of a grid of type, used in printing.

by green star oakland on Apr 21, 2005 6:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Can we clone Kotsay?
That's all I want to say about last night.

by Jennifer on Apr 21, 2005 6:33 AM PDT reply actions  

I've been saying this for awhile
A team of 9 Kotsays would be better than what we have now. I bet he even pitches better than some of the guys we've got.

by jmoney on Apr 21, 2005 10:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

A few points
Jeter was never good at defense, but i understand what you are saying.

I thought Zito had a good start. The fact that he was able to keep us in the game after that terrible first inning said a lot about his confidence. I bet he doesn't give up a run his next start.

Kielty, rejuvenated by his new genetically created St.Pats Day/Oktoberfest, shows us why Billy and Ohad are geniuses.

by ohad on Apr 21, 2005 6:48 AM PDT reply actions  

chavy
while it is obvious that number 3 will start a crazy streak in the near future, organizations don't spend 10's of millions for "streaks". he has to get more confidence. i don't want him to become milton bradley, but man, wouldn't it be nice to see chavvy get in someones face once in a while, or at least show some passion?

nice guys finish last, especially in competition. he needs to find the thrash.

last night in the eighth it seemed as though he was hoping/looking for a walk.

byrnes should not have been in the field that late in the game. his defense is a liability in close games. what the hell is chucky t doing on the bench in that inning?

this loss rests at the feet of macha.

greendatitiz

by greendatitiz on Apr 21, 2005 7:24 AM PDT reply actions  

Why?
Why is it obvious exactly?? Is it all the clutch hits? The consistent well struck balls that just happen to find the outfielders? His obvious confidence at the plate? Just wondering what games you are watching.......

by AlwaysSweatin on Apr 21, 2005 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

re: why
chavez is streaky, is he not? i'm looking at the past few seasons, not just the past 2 weeks.

greendatitiz

by greendatitiz on Apr 21, 2005 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just to remind folks
(and I'm not defending Chavy who had, IMO, an unacceptable AB yesterday), but those pining "we should have kept Miggy instead" seem to have forgotten how bad a start to the season he had a couple years ago, pressing and trying too hard--his numbers were just as bad as Chavy's current ones, he looked just as bad, and it lasted more than 2 weeks (and he wound up having an excellent season overall).

Also, to those who, in ST, wanted Dotel traded and Street closing, please note that this stage of Street's career he is less effective vs. lefties than Bradford and far less than Dotel. Street will be great someday; not just yet, though. The A's know what they're doing.

Except with Byrnesy. One reason CT and Kielty can't get going is that no one is getting every day ABs. Byrnes has never hit righties all that well, he's especially struggling this year--if you want to get Thomas untracked, and if you want his far superlative defense and judgement, you have to play him regularly, which "against all righties" would accomplish. Time to make the adjustment, Mach.

Nico

by Nico on Apr 21, 2005 7:28 AM PDT reply actions  

Miggy swung the bat
I'll take a guy who is pressing and trying too hard over a guy who is afraid to swing the bat any day. Chavez has looked afraid all season long. He's been ducking away from pitches that have been called for strikes, which is insane considering how far off the plate he stands.

It's nice to get a walk when there's nobody on base and you're tied and you want to start a rally. When you're down and you have the bases loaded, you gotta SWING!

by RichardP on Apr 21, 2005 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

I am hiding
under the bed during the Boston and New York series.
Alaska-A, Number-one-A's-fan-in-southern-southeast-Alaska.

by ak_A on Apr 21, 2005 7:52 AM PDT reply actions  

man
I hate Boston and NY fans.
"Put a Milo on him."
-Billy Beane

by kaweahkaweah on Apr 21, 2005 8:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Good idea
That might be a good idea.

by Larry E on Apr 21, 2005 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

best moment of the night was when...
Swisher replaced the divot he took out when making that sliding catch in foul territory.  I thought that was hilarious.

by mbrinda on Apr 21, 2005 7:52 AM PDT reply actions  

divot
I'm glad I'm not the only one who found that hilarious....  ;)

by gigglingone on Apr 21, 2005 8:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm Gonna Admit
... that I may have been wrong on Swisher.

He looks like a much better outfielder now than he did in spring training, and he appears to be a better hitter than I gave him credit for. He's not great in the outfield, but he's certainly adequate ... and improving.

What's impressive is that he seems to be able to make adjustments at the plate -- which I feared his high strikeout totals indicated he wouldn't be able to do.

by Eck on Apr 21, 2005 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh yeah ...
and replacing the divot was fantastic!

by Eck on Apr 21, 2005 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Remember
That he was more of a 1B than an OF in college. He is still learning and hopefully will continue to improve on defence.

by Larry E on Apr 21, 2005 7:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Always replace your divots
The whole section I was in down the RF line applauded him for cleaning up after himself.

by Jeff in Seattle on Apr 21, 2005 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

At least....
Two teams have scored less runs than us.  Kansas City and Pittsburgh.

by BlueMoon68 on Apr 21, 2005 8:04 AM PDT reply actions  

Seattle
Is it just me, or have we taken some brutal losses at Safeco Field?  
  • Duke's Balk
  • Bucky Jacobsen's Walk-Off Homerun
  • Last Nights Game
It's seems like we've had some bad luck in Seattle.  
Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Apr 21, 2005 8:23 AM PDT reply actions  

How bout the game in 01...
When Ichiro made The Throw and Mecir blew the game in the 8th...The worst.
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Apr 21, 2005 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

a few more last year?
i think there may have been one or two more last year.  didn't either ibanez or winn hit a game winning home run?

by xbhaskarx on Apr 21, 2005 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

And Boston
And Texas, Anaheim,Minnesota, NY...

I'm sick of everyone blaming fuckups on luck.

I'll try not to swear.

by Tony on Apr 21, 2005 3:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

who?
Who should we put in the outfield instead? Kielty? Thomas? We need an offensive AND defensive stud out there -- no one we have is going to do it...

I'm all for cloning Kotsay...  ;)

by gigglingone on Apr 21, 2005 8:25 AM PDT reply actions  

LF A Black Hole
Right now, LF is a black hole for the A's offensively. While Kielty and Thomas remain hitless, ByrnesBrain is now 2-28 vs righties and is on a pace to "better" his 9-103 streak of 2003. He's simply too dumb to lay off the low and outside slider. That pitch has been getting that idiot out since he came up from AAA.

And Bumblin Byrnesey is a defensive OF on a level with Ben Grieve. He has Grieve's spaghetti arm and while he is far faster, he regularly gets bad breaks on balls (as he did last night) and misreads. At least Ole Slewfoot Ben caught the few balls he could reach and didn't miss the cutoff man, as ByrnesBrain so often does. And when Grieve was with the A's, he was a powerful hitter. As we used to say when I was a kid, Byrnes couldn't hit the broadside of Jayne Mansfield.

I'd rather have an excellent defensive player in LF like Thomas or an adequate OF like Kielty, for even if they don't hit, they won't kill the A's in the field. Byrnes defense has outright cost the A's two games (last night and the first game in Tampa) and since he can't hit, he gives the A's NADA by being in the lineup.

BB should trade this DUMB BUM, even if all he gets is some minor cash relief for the payroll. Eventually, Thomas--a fine defensive OF--will come around as he demonstrated in Atlanta he could hit MLB pitching. And he would be a welcome option to Byrnes LF Butcher Shop.

Those critical of Macha for not bringing Rincon in to face Dobbs are, in some cases, those who criticized Macha for bringing in Rincon in other situations. They must be unaware what Macha knew: that in a crucial game late last year, Dobbs smashed a double off of Rincon to beat the A's. Moreover, Macha has to find out what Street--designated the Second Coming of Eck by some of you--can do vs hitters from both sides of the plate during crunch time.

Re: Chavvy. I won't mind seeing Macha either giving Chavez a day off (put Ginter at third--he has played there) to take some of the pressure off him. Or, until Chavvy gets his batting eye back, place him lower in the order--for example, hit Swisher third and Durazo fourth, with Chavvy dropped down to Swisher's seven spot for a few games.

by reztips on Apr 21, 2005 8:56 AM PDT reply actions  

Did I miss the Sandy Alderson Discussion?
By the way, as we are all Bill Beane fans (In Billy We Trust), how is it that there has not been more dicussion about the recent decision of Sandy Alderson to leave the MLB offices and go to San Diego.

Afterall, don't we have Sandy to thank for Billy?

Any thoughts folk?

by NovA'sFan on Apr 21, 2005 9:13 AM PDT reply actions  

Wow...so now u rip Beane...
and the t shirts Blez sells?  Youre just being a dick now.
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Apr 21, 2005 9:46 AM PDT reply actions  

Blez, you're part of the Byrnes bashing problem
Byrnes is also battling those mental demons now.  

On any other team he would have come into this season as the starting leftfielder.  But from the start he was told that he had to compete with a rookie, a guy who's ony played half a season in a different league and a guy who was so bad that all normal people are still wondering why he's still in baseball.  Wow,  that must have done wonders for his self-confidence.

Then there were all of the trade rumors.  Does this team want him, is this team shopping him around.  Again, great for the self-confidence.

And then once the season starts, Beane's puppet decides, for the first time ever, that this is little league and four of the five outfielders should just share the outfield, all getting their fair number of at bats.  So, after all of his hard work left field still isn't his.  To compound the problem, if he goes just one night without a hit, he gets benched.  Golly, that's got to feel good, don't you think?  Have you noticed that no one else is getting treated the same way; that people are being allowed to struggle?

So what does our intrepid outfielder do?  He starts to press.  Even though he knows this is the worst thing he could possibly do, even though he has public stated that this is the wrong approach, he tries too hard.  And it shows.

But there you are, making light of the whole situation and leading your AN ditto-heads into the daily bash.  That's too bad of you.

Anyway, it is my hope now that Byrnes gets traded to a team that will treat him with respect, because that is never going to happen on a team led by Billy Beane.

The Gadfly

by Just Me on Apr 21, 2005 9:50 AM PDT reply actions  

if Byrnes can't earn his job when he's asked to
then he doesn't belong on ANY team.

And to be fair, Macha stated once the season started that Byrnes was going to get his 500 at bats. So I'm not sure I agree with your theory of why he's pressing. He was starting in a game that he had no business starting in last night. He's getting his chances...Macha loves him, the team loves him, most of the fans adore him...what else does he need?

by Sharon on Apr 21, 2005 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

I was A-Mazed to see some things last night...
First of all, with a flyball pitcher in a pitcher's park where there is a lot of ground to cover and a righty on the mound I was astounded to not see two buck chuck in LF.

Second, why Kotsay is not hitting 3rd right now is WAY beyond me. He is our best run producer with the bat currently.

Third, why Kendall has not had a day off yet is mind boggling. Macha says that he wants Jason to get a good look against the AL West pitchers the first time through. Melhuse is a power stick from the LH side and he hits the cover off of fastballs. AND we are going to need to keep this guy somewhat fresh!!

Fourth, Ellis is the man!!! If this guy hits .300 and plays GG defense we will win the West!!!

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Apr 21, 2005 9:53 AM PDT reply actions  

I was also surprised to see Ginter
on the bench all night.

Chavy 0-14 w RISP against a guy he is 0-9 against...HMMMM???

Kielty allowed to bat in the 9th w/ Ginter on the bench....HMMMMM???

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Apr 21, 2005 10:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

likewise
i nearly turned the tv off.  had gameday on and took a peak at the bench - couldnt believe it.  check swing to end it - gggggggggggggreat job bobby.

by alamedabomber on Apr 21, 2005 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed. That's hilarious.
A good cigar is like a beautiful chick with a great body who also knows the American League box scores.

by baseballgirl on Apr 21, 2005 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hatteberg
 he was ok, when we had more thunder.

Dan Johnson... a trade... something...

THE WORST OFFENSIVE 1B in the ENTIRE LEAGUE!

by GrewUpAtTheColiseum on Apr 21, 2005 9:58 AM PDT reply actions  

the morning after
  1. Barry's 1st inning WAS awful, but what it more important, in the context of Zito, is that he was able to shake it off and keep us in the game thru 6 innings. We all know his confidence has been an issue for the last 1 1/2 years and last night was a good sign that he's learning how to get that back. Plus, I think Kendall helps him more than Ramon or Damian ever did. We have to realize that Barry will always be an enigma.
  2. When are A's fan's going to realize that Eric Byrnes is nothing but an average player? He's physically talented, but his baseball skills are very unconventional. Usually he gets bad jumps on balls, but because he's so quick, he can usually make up for that. He certainly doesn't make it look easy out there like our friend Kotsay. The sad truth is that Byrnes will be too expensive for us to keep... especially since he's basically a 4th outfielder, so trade him sooner rather than later. I want to see Thomas in there more often. His bat will come around and he's less of a defensive liabilty. I love Byrnes for his energy and hustle, but like Robert Buan said last week, sometimes A's fans confuse that with being a great player.
  3. Chavez needs to bat 4th or 5th until he gets out of this funk. He looks scared at the plate. Last night in that bases loaded situation he looked like he wanted to be anywhere but up at bat. I think his mind is on his slump and it's starting to effect his defense. Sure, he'll come around eventually, but in the meantime Macha should take some pressure off of him and let him get his confidence back. (Maybe Chavez and Barry can get a 2 for 1 counseling session!)

by thebigbz on Apr 21, 2005 10:05 AM PDT reply actions  

I agree
  1.  It was good to see Zito not come completely unglued.  He was lucky though, that more runs didn't score.  He is an average pitcher, so he should stop acting like the star he will never be again, and just pitch the best he can.  If he gets us 12-14 wins with an era of 4.2, I'll say he's done fine for his ability.
  2.  Byrnes is just not very good.  Very athletic and fast, but not very good.  We've already exceeded the utility we could have hoped for from him, and his selling price should be way over his expected value.  Don't be a stranger, come back and do interviews, we wish him all the best.
  3.  Agree.  Chavy needs to hit 7 or 8 for at least a few weeks.  Ginter, Melhuse, Swisher, whoever seems to be the pick of the day, can fill up the middle of the order for a while.

by iceplant on Apr 21, 2005 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

The reason
Chavvy is playing bad right now is because of lack of confidence. What would that do to his confidence if he batted eighth?

He's a bonafide slugger. You don't move a slugger of his caliber into the 8 hole because of a two week slump. If Barry Bonds hit 0-50 to start the season would he bat eighth? No. Carlos lee is like 2-25, he's still battin fourth over in Milwaukee.

Kielty, rejuvenated by his new genetically created St.Pats Day/Oktoberfest, shows us why Billy and Ohad are geniuses.

by ohad on Apr 21, 2005 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

I disagree...
Batting him lower in the order would take some of the pressure off him and allow him to find his stroke.  7th or 8th is probably too low, but 6th would be totally reasonable.

by LD on Apr 21, 2005 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

didn't Chavvy once suggest
a couple of years back that he be dropped down the batting order, when he was struggling? Does anyone remember that? If I'm correct I would imagine that he might agree to it for a brief time.

by OaklandSi on Apr 21, 2005 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Does anyone remember
A similar occurrence in 2002 when the A's led the Red Sox by 2 runs and Byrnes decided to dive for a single in a heroic attempt to keep runners at second and third from scoring?  If I remember correctly, that attempt failed too (though we did win that game when Greg Meyer went yard in the 9th)  I love that boy but he makes me nervous....

by hellafeel on Apr 21, 2005 10:23 AM PDT reply actions  

Actually, the crippling one
was Dye's dive in Texas last September (it ended the game with a Rangers sweep). Good gamble, maybe (I actually didn't see it) but baaaaaaad outcome (sorry to be so sheepish).
Nico

by Nico on Apr 21, 2005 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

Who is Mr. Clutch?
This first few weeks aside, who is the guy you most want up to bat in a clutch situation? To me, Chavez has NEVER been Mr. Clutch, even when he's not 0-15 w/RISP. I might say Kotsay or Hatteberg (maybe Kendall.) They all are very capable of putting the ball in play. Not necessarily hitting the dingers, but getting solid doubles.

What about a big game pitcher? Right now, I'd have to go with Zito only because he has a great track record in big game situations. Harden's creeping up there though.

by thebigbz on Apr 21, 2005 10:35 AM PDT reply actions  

Big game pitcher
I have immense confidence in Zito. But Harden is just soooo good i'm not sure who id choose.
Kielty, rejuvenated by his new genetically created St.Pats Day/Oktoberfest, shows us why Billy and Ohad are geniuses.

by ohad on Apr 21, 2005 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm glad some of you are beginning to understand .
the criticism of Chavez has little or nothing to do with his stat line at the end of the season.  Will he have "good" numbers at the end of the season? Probably. Decent, no doubt. Probably 25-30 home runs and a 100 or so RBI.
But the team did not sign him to a lucrative long-term deal for a "nice" stat line.  He was signed to the deal because it was assumed he might become the leader this team needs -- the kind of guy that will put a team on his shoulder and lead it to victory.
You don't always have to be a "vocal" guy to accomplish this -- but you certainly have to be the guy that craves, demands, and yearns for big at-bats like last night's.
Chavez is supposed to be the star -- this is what he "agreed" to when he signed his name on the dotted line.
In essence, he said, "I want to be THE guy. I want to be the one counted on more than any other to produce when the team needs it. I want to be the one guy in the lineup that the opposing pitcher absolutely dreads seeing.  I want to be the guy who strikes fear into the other team ala Manny, or Bonds, or Pujols, or Guerrero, or Tejada. I'm being paid the most to contribute the most. I am the A's marquee player and I will play like it."
It isn't so much that he struck out last night -- it was how he did it. He just stood there -- I still can't believe it. If you don't think he was praying for a walk -- just begging to himself, "please let this be a ball,"-- then you are unbelievably naive.
Chavez has never been this type of player -- he clearly performs better NOT being the guy -- when the pressure is off, and the game is out of reach, this is when he gets the majority of his hits and RBI
Ohad, I still believe that if you could somehow determine when his RBI and HR come, you would see that the vast majority are when one team or the other is up 2 or three or more runs.
He is a "deer in the headlights" when the pressure is on -- but I betcha he's got no such hesitation when he goes to the bank to cash that fat check!
I bet his dream is to be the first guy ever to walk with the bases loaded to win the World Series. What a sad, sad joke.
VacaAsFan

by Vacafan on Apr 21, 2005 11:25 AM PDT reply actions  

Wow
Even I can't be that harsh towards Chavvy...

All I'll say is this:  If Chavvy was all the things you (Vacafan) want him to be, he would be wearing a different uniform - Yankees, RedSox, etc...He doesn't want the pressure to perform under the microscope, where fans demand that high-profile players do more than show up for work.  He saw how Giambi was under the microscope for not producing in "the clutch" in April, 2003...Yankees fans booed him relentlessly until he finally hit a walk-off grandslam sometime in May, 2003.

He said these things while on the Jim Rome Show about 3-4 weeks ago.

We can only hope that his way is the best way for himself.

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Apr 21, 2005 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Assumptions
It was assumed that just because he signed a lucrative contract he'd be the guy to pick up Swisher when he's down, squash Byrnsie for making a bad play and all that other stuff that leaders do? He was signed because he's a phenomenal player. Thats it.
Kielty, rejuvenated by his new genetically created St.Pats Day/Oktoberfest, shows us why Billy and Ohad are geniuses.

by ohad on Apr 21, 2005 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Huh?
I'm saying that he signed w/ the A's because expectations are very low in Oakland.  Chavvy doesn't have the drive to be "The Best".  That's fine.  Some people are like that...

I just don't understand how this is Mark Kotsay's team.  It should be Chavvy's team, but its not.

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Apr 21, 2005 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was responding to Vacafan.
Kielty, rejuvenated by his new genetically created St.Pats Day/Oktoberfest, shows us why Billy and Ohad are geniuses.

by ohad on Apr 21, 2005 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why Byrnes?
Why didn't BB trade Byrnes to the Pirates? Oh wait he couln't trade the "fan favorite". Even though the Pirates were willing to part with there #1 Pitching Prospect Zach Duke who's numbers last year were: 15-6, 1.45, 142 K's in 148 IP! I guess BB wishes he'd made it!

by jsmith5241 on Apr 21, 2005 11:38 AM PDT reply actions  

Come On, Now
Beane asked for Zach Duke or Mike Gonzalez, and the Pirates said no. If they had said yes, a trade would have happened. And besides, Byrnes screwed up last night, but at least he has a hit this season, unlike the two guys who would be playing every day if he wasn't here.

by jmoney on Apr 21, 2005 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Quintessential Chavy
I want to love the guy, but that throw to first while Street was pitching was symbolic of his attitude - remember at the beginning of the season, when he commented that his arm strength wasn't that great, and he would start one hopping it to first? That looked like what he did there, but there is no reason he couldn't have just gone for the out and helped his rookie pitcher. He is the star, the four time gold glover, he is the one who needs to try and make the throw to help out the young pitcher and the struggling team. Make excuses, claim early season, but that doesn't change the way one approaches the game; otherwise, people are going to spend the next five years of his contract making expressing those exact same sentiments.
Maybe something i haven't even heard of before...

by slapnuts on Apr 21, 2005 11:46 AM PDT reply actions  

Explain
plz slapnuts "but there is no reason he couldn't have just gone for the out and helped his rookie pitcher" He had only one play, 1st.

by oakwin2004 on Apr 21, 2005 11:52 AM PDT reply actions  

So what?
He's not the guy to carry the team. Would you not sign the contract if they backed the Brink's truck up to your door? What do you want him to do, give the money back? Do you want him traded? For who?

Thank goodness it's only 10 more hours until we get to read again what's wrong with everbody on this team and what they should've done.

Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains. But not at Safeco Field.

Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects. - Will Rogers

by McFood on Apr 21, 2005 11:52 AM PDT reply actions  

Eh's North
i have been a massive A's fan for something like 18 years, all of them living in Southeastern Ontario. i think my love stemmed from the fact that they always kicked the ***t out of the Bluejays, and i loved being the only kid wearing a green hat at Jays games.
But i'm much older now, soon to be married and become a father, and now i discover AN.
God Bless you A's fans every one cuz it's been a long and lonely existance up here. Reading your insight and passion for my favorite franchise is like E.T. meeting up with all his alien buddies.
(or something)
Don't stop dreaming about tomorrow. It will soon be here. There's a lot to love about an underdog, rookie team that can't win but will soon. It's fun to watch.
Kudos AN

by easyrichboy on Apr 21, 2005 11:55 AM PDT reply actions  

Chavy's throw to 1st
I'm kind of surprised at the analysis of this. From my point of view, the mistake was in throwing at all--I don't think a perfect throw gets him. It wasn't the throw, it was the decision, and a potentially game-saving play/decision by Hatteberg that should not be overlooked.

I think vacaville's condemnation of Chavy stems from putting him into an assumed position that he's not in. He's not a "franchise player" or a "carry the team" player. He's a very streaky who is clutch when he's hot--because he hits in ALL situations--and who will put up excellent numbers with a gold glove, and is thus worth a relatively large contract on a small-market team.

It's not Beane, the A's, Chavy, or non-extreme-speaking bloggers who have inflated the view of what Chavy "is supposed to be." And when he's going well, he gets plenty of clutch hits, because when he's going well he hits everything and when he's going badly he hits nothing.

Sit him a day, bring him back with a clear head, and keep on truckin'.

Nico

by Nico on Apr 21, 2005 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

non-extreme-speaking bloggers
of the world, unite! We have nothing to lose but our manners!
athleticsnation.com, 164

by ArakSOT on Apr 21, 2005 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

TFF!!!
How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb-thrower

by LowcountryJoe on Apr 21, 2005 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

McFood ...
what do I want him to do??!!

Heaven forbid, but I want him to play like a guy who just signed a fat, multi-year contract!!!

What kind of question is that??

No, I don't want him to give the money back -- No, I don't want to trade him.

I want him to perform. I want him to do his job.  I want him to play like a guy who signed the largest Athletics contract in team history. I want him to play and contribute like the highest paid player on a team should.

I guess that's asking too much.

"What do I want him to do." Unbelievable.

VacaAsFan

by Vacafan on Apr 21, 2005 12:05 PM PDT reply actions  

Oh.....
Apparently he's not performing because he doesn't know what you want him to do. That's so simple, how could I have missed it? Just call him up and tell him, and then all his problems will be solved.

Of course we all want him to be the man!

Unbelievable is right.

Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects. - Will Rogers

by McFood on Apr 21, 2005 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ok so after two weeks
He's not playing like that. That's different than your stance this whole time that he should be a leader.
Kielty, rejuvenated by his new genetically created St.Pats Day/Oktoberfest, shows us why Billy and Ohad are geniuses.

by ohad on Apr 21, 2005 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Bad losses
This is obviously the kind of loss which leaves a bad aftertaste.  All of our weaknesses seemed to be underscored here.

Zito gets bit by One Bad Inning yet again. Can't tell you how many games in the last three years I've seen him cruising and then give up a 3 run tater. Points for reversing the order, though, and giving up the slam in the first, then bearing down.

Chavvy - I guess we're getting a Matt Williams type player, rather than a Mike Schmidt. Good glove (though not recently), some power and low average. He's looked weak against lefties (which seems weird after his development in that area last year). He's tentative in the field and at the plate. It sure doesn't look like this is going to be a breakout season.

We're giving power at way too many key positions. Our combined 1B/DH combo of Hatte and Ruby only knocked 37 HR last year. We need that kind of production out of one hitter. We just can't afford that little power from those positions, particularly when we're not getting much power from the outfield either.

Forget about RISP. We're not going to score enough runs with timely hitting. We need some thumpers out there.  

Huzzah for the young guns, though. Haren, Blanton, and Harden are all performing beautifully even if they don't have the wins to show for it.

by DavidS on Apr 21, 2005 12:21 PM PDT reply actions  

Actually
Those great games and then three run taters ruining it all came last year.
Kielty, rejuvenated by his new genetically created St.Pats Day/Oktoberfest, shows us why Billy and Ohad are geniuses.

by ohad on Apr 21, 2005 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Who's team is this years team?
Pitchers excluded because they play 1 out of every 5 games:

2000 - Jason Giambi (Playoffs)
2001 - Jason Giambi (Playoffs)
2002 - Jason Giambi (Playoffs)
2003 - Miguel Tejada (Playoffs)
2004 - ????????????? (Missed the Playoffs)
2005 - Mark Kotsay (Playoffs?)

This is Chavvy's 7th season with the A's...Why hasn't Chavez made it HIS team?  I think I know the answer, but I want to hear other thoughts...

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Apr 21, 2005 12:25 PM PDT reply actions  

The bullpen
was much more solid all of those other years.  Blame the offense all you want for last season but if you ask me, it was the bullpen.

If our offense needed that much retooling then that's where we would have seen all of our efforts directed in the offseason.  Instead, we strengthened the bullpen.

by keNbO on Apr 21, 2005 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Leader
I'm just looking for a Leader of this team.  All championship teams have at least 1 True Leader.
Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Apr 21, 2005 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

2004
Huddy.

2005: First half: Kotsay. Second Half: Crosby

Kielty, rejuvenated by his new genetically created St.Pats Day/Oktoberfest, shows us why Billy and Ohad are geniuses.

by ohad on Apr 21, 2005 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Crosby
I'm curious why you keep saying this...  he didn't demonstrate any particularly remarkable leadership last year.  In fact, I remember lots of posters on this board lamenting that the only real vocal, visible presence in the dugout was Eric Byrnes...

by LD on Apr 21, 2005 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

You know what?
I don't know. He reminds me of Huddy. He is liked by all the players i guess could be one reason. Whe i watched A's games, i noticed Crosby cared. I noticed he just has something special about him. I don't really know. I just have that feeling about Crosby.
Kielty, rejuvenated by his new genetically created St.Pats Day/Oktoberfest, shows us why Billy and Ohad are geniuses.

by ohad on Apr 21, 2005 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Fair Enough...
Like I said, I was just curious what had your spidey sense tingling about him...

by LD on Apr 21, 2005 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's not his
spidey sense that's tingling.

:)

Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects. - Will Rogers

by McFood on Apr 21, 2005 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Would everyone agree with me...
that baseball is a game based on failure?

Players going into hitting slumps is a natural part of the game.  It's going to happen.  Yes, even to the players that have huge salaries.  Remember Jeter last season earning the cover of SI with his slump?  What was Manny Ramirez hitting before he recently broke out?

What bothers me even more than the hitting slumps are the mental lapses on the defensive side of the ball.  This is supposed to be an excellent defensive team.  But Hatteberg dropping that foul ball yesterday.  Chavy not making a play that he's made 1,001 times before.  And then Byrnes' repeated mistakes in left field.

I can accept that Byrnes, Chavy, Ruby and Thomas aren't swinging the bats well, but the defense is absolutely needed.  That bothers me more than the lack of hitting.  The A's are in a tie ball game if Chavy makes the play to first and/or Byrnes doesn't dive for a ball three feet out of his reach.

The defense, outside of the game against Anaheim when Scoot, Kendall, Byrnes and Street all had remarkable plays, has been subpar.  Even Thomas, who Bobby Cox called the best defensive outfielder he'd ever coached (this from a guy who currently has Andruw Jones on his roster), has made a mistake.

The defense needs to shape up.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Apr 21, 2005 12:32 PM PDT reply actions  

Totally agree
Hitting and pitching in the Majors are finely tuned, sophisticated skills, but the defensive failures last night were failures of FUNDAMENTAL skills.  
"Put a Milo on him."
-Billy Beane

by kaweahkaweah on Apr 21, 2005 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

baseball may be a game based on failure
but the a's are a franchise that is used to success, which means the fans are used to success as well.

the biggest disappointments have been zito and chavez/durazo, yet the a's are only one game out of first place, with crosby injured.

a 7-8 start in a rebuilding year and everyone is panicking, meanwhile we make fun of steinbrenner for going ballistic when the yanks start out 4-8.

by xbhaskarx on Apr 21, 2005 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Patience
is the key.  Yes we're all a little mad at Chavy.  It's understandable because he really does look lost right now.  What's more shocking is that he seems lost on offense AND defense.  He's already made two or three errors this season hasn't he?

I firmly believe he will turn it around.  Look to the NL and check out a guy named Andruw Jones.  It's not just Chavy who's totally lost at the plate.

I don't think we should get too down on the team right now.  Yeah all the games count but aren't we the team that's notorious for having the best second half in baseball for the past few years?  And haven't we been in the playoffs more often than not, since 2000?  

The offense, and Chavez, will eventually get rolling.

   

by keNbO on Apr 21, 2005 12:45 PM PDT reply actions  

Explain
how chavez's throw to 1st was a fundamental error. thanks.

by oakwin2004 on Apr 21, 2005 12:50 PM PDT reply actions  

Actually, I don't think that was
From what I could tell, that was a tough hit to field.  My major beef is with Byrnes.  
"Put a Milo on him."
-Billy Beane

by kaweahkaweah on Apr 21, 2005 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Now
that was a fundamental error..lol

by oakwin2004 on Apr 21, 2005 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

I never said his was a fundamental error
I said, it's a play he's made 1,001 times.  Guess I've come to expect that from him, even if he's struggling at the plate.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Apr 21, 2005 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was referring
to you Blez. No worries. That's why baseball is great, today is a new day and if chavez goes 3-4 and the A's win, we can all be happy until friday.:)

by oakwin2004 on Apr 21, 2005 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

And if they win
We can still find something new to complain about.  :-)
"Put a Milo on him."
-Billy Beane

by kaweahkaweah on Apr 21, 2005 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

don't be surprised if word comes out...
...that eric is hurt in some way...possibly lower back problems or something. i've suggested numerous times in the past on this site (only to get crapped on-thats OK) much that has already been pointed out by many: eric's lack of leadership qualities, passiveness, never will be a good 4 hole hitter, etc, etc.

nevertheless, i like eric as a player and i'm glad he is an A. but whether he likes it or not eric is the stud bull on this team. a team pays huge for that type of player...and the a's did- 66 mil times over. BUT i must believe eric is injured in some way. in all years i watched eric play-since he was 19 yrs old-he has NEVER played this bad offensively and on defense.

i think he is injured somehow.

"Hey Ho Let's Go!"- The 2005 A's, kickin' some ass.

by bigelephant on Apr 21, 2005 12:52 PM PDT reply actions  

Injured
You could be right.  He ran a bit gingerly on a double down the line on Tuesday afternoon in Texas.  It looked like he was stretching his hamstrings, but he could have been trying to stretch his lower back.  It's something to keep an eye on, for sure.
Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Apr 21, 2005 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's not that he's injured...
...it's just that the moon got in his eyes last night.
Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects. - Will Rogers

by McFood on Apr 21, 2005 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Excellent point..
I actually thought he has pulled something the the way he ran out that double.
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Apr 21, 2005 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Trends
No harm, no foul.

I'm not stressed yet. If the AL West trend continues, the teams that won yesterday will lose today, and the division will continue to be stacked w/.500 teams.

In defense of Zito, he was clearly frustrated in the 1st inning last night. I was watching from the CF bleachers and he was really busting the righthanders inside with what looked like a pretty good pitch. He wasn't getting that call, and at one point had to walk off the mound to control his disgust with the homeplate ump.

You have to give him credit for regrouping after his original plan of attack was nullified by, in my estimation, poor officiating.

Lord Vader... ...yesss massster? ...RISE!!!

by Force on Apr 21, 2005 1:12 PM PDT reply actions  

Credit goes to STEVE IN NAPA
Three year totals--2002-2005:

Let's seperate the 2 and put players in order from best to worst:

1) Men on base, 2 outs:

Kendall .311
Tejada .309
Scutaro .288
Kotsay .273
Durazo .270
Hatteberg .268
Byrnes .241
Chavez .235

2) RISP, 2 outs:

Tejada .329
Kendall .301
Kotsay .273
Byrnes .258
Durazo .255
Hatteberg .240
Scutaro .239
Chavez .227

Sample size:

Tejada had 353 AB with MOB 2 out and 231 AB RISP, 2 out- total 584 AB.

Chavez had 298 AB with MOB 2 out and 176 AB RISP, 2 out- total 474 AB.  

Big enough?
-------------------------------------

Bottom Line:  Chavez is not Clutch

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Apr 21, 2005 1:27 PM PDT reply actions  

I have to say
you provide compelling data and a reasonable conclusion.

My bottom line: Yes, we need a leader, no it's not Chavy, but no it doesn't have to be--he can be a high-paid, productive, multi-talented player.

I think the personality/character/leadership of this team is Kotsay and Kendall, which is why I like having them bat 1 and 2 in the order. By the second batter of the game, the other team already experienced the heart, soul, and gut of the A's.

What's interesting to me is how average Kotsay is (.273 in both), a little worse than I would have guessed.

Nico

by Nico on Apr 21, 2005 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good numbers, thx !!
... my evidence and argument is more anecdotal !!

Remember the painful 2001 ALDS when the Yankees couldn't get T-Long OUT !!

they were more fearful of T-Long than Chavy.

Chavy was the guy the Spanks chose to go after in the 5-hole and Chavy struck out five times in 21 ABs with 3 hits.

(here come the 'it's 21 ABs, 4-years-ago' responses)

... the Yankees knew Chavy would oblige by expanding and NOT KNOWING the strike zone when the pressure was on.

It's still the same. (someone will respond: Chavy led the league in walks in 2004 with 6 weeks on DL)

I know the numbers, I just want the guy to WANT to be the 'Straw that stirs the Drink !!'

He doesn't want to be that guy. He doesn't want to be the guy to perform with the pressure incumbent of the largest contract in team history.

I loathe BB (Barry Bonds, not Beane), BUT Barry KNOWS he's the guy. He wants the be the guy because he knows he's good. Bonds was the man, even before the juice. Chavy's just lost.

I bring up Bonds because Beane compared Chavez's early numbers with Bonds's early numbers to argue how good Eric Chavez is and to justify the largest contract in team history !!

The 86-87-88 Pirates were bad teams. Bonds didn't have the lineup insulation and protection that Chavy was afforded early on !!

Chavy was always protected in the lineup in 99, 00, 01, 02 and 03 ... by guys like J. Giambi, Stairs, Jaha, Tejada, even a more-productive Hatty ...

Chavy's lineup protection is gone and the 'bright lights' are directed AT Chavy and He's Blinking and Staring. Even that plate discipline is gone!!

Step-up, Chavy !!  STEP-UP !!

PS: I will always remember Chavy's awesome play in the 12th of Game 1 of '03 ALDS saving the game and setting the scene of Ramon's walk-off BUNT !!

by HerbWashington on Apr 21, 2005 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just an awesome play....
Harden had no business in that game (or the Trot game) but Chavy saved him...One of the best clutch plays Ive seen.
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Apr 21, 2005 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Are you serious?
I'm probably getting this in too late for anyone to read it but "Stairs and Jaha"????? Don't be ridiculous?

Regarding Bonds and "line up insulation", the 87 and 88 Pirate teams had Bobby Bonilla and Andy Van Slyke

by steeraw on Apr 21, 2005 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Saddest thing I get from that is:
Remembering all of the times that Marco was lifted in RBI sitiations and replaced by MacLemore or Billy Mac last year.

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Apr 21, 2005 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

oh yeah...
A baseball game is simply a nervous breakdown divided into nine innings. ~Earl Wilson

by baseballgirl on Apr 21, 2005 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Chavvy's RISP numbers in general are good ...
I repeat what I said in another thread:  The last sentence in the overview on ESPN's Chavez page states:

Over his career, Chavez has been a better performer with runners aboard or in scoring position, and a .340 hitter with the bases loaded.

Why is two-out RISP so much more important than generic RISP?

No one has ever demonstrated that clutch hitting exists.  You can point to past performance and label players as non-clutch, but that past performance does not predict how those players will perform in the future.

by floyd on Apr 21, 2005 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

You still don't get it, Floyd.
There are Joe Montana's & Tom Brady's...
...then there are Jeff George's & Ryan Leaf's.

Winners & Losers are all over the place.

I'm sure you'll fight that Tom Brady & Joe Montana only played 8 Superbowls combined, thus the Small Sample Size proves that they were just lucky.  

Come on man, some people have "it".  Some people don't have "it".

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Apr 21, 2005 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Based on the patronizing tone
of your headline, floyd, I'd say you don't get "it". Whatever "it" is.

Now that was a clutch post on my part, typed with bloggers in scoring position, no less.

Nico

by Nico on Apr 21, 2005 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

of course,
I put the wrong handle, coloradofan, opening me up to infinite ridicule in return. Oops, look at the time--gotta go and never check this thread again.
Nico

by Nico on Apr 21, 2005 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

How do you pronounce "Nico"
As in, rhymes with "choke"?
Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects. - Will Rogers

by McFood on Apr 21, 2005 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rhymes with "choke"?
You must be confusing me with the cola product. My name rhymes with:

 Kiko (Calero)
 Biko (Stephen)
 Rico (Suave´) and
 Freak-o
 

Nico

by Nico on Apr 21, 2005 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

And there are Derek Jeters and Mariano Riveras
When the Yankees were winning World Series, Jeter and Rivera could do no wrong.  They were "clutch."

Later, Rivera lost game 7 of 2001.  He let the Red Sox claw back last year, and Jeter was nowhere to be seen in that series.  But because they had already been labelled "clutch," no one called them chokers.

What if the order of those events had been reversed?  Would Jeter and Rivera be labelled chokers, only to gain a little redemption through later success?

The human mind is good at perceiving patterns.  Sometimes too good, because there are situations in which patterns are meaningless.  Day-to-day performance in baseball is one of those situations.

And if I am wrong, you can prove me wrong.  If clutch exists it can be measured.  No one has been able to do so.  You can show that some players have performed worse than average in certain situations, but you cannot predict that those players will continue to do so.  

by floyd on Apr 21, 2005 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

No one has ever demonstrated that clutch hitting
exists? Mr.October? Hendu with the game on the line, rickey, young robby alomar...

by oakwin2004 on Apr 21, 2005 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Can we agree that...
...Chavvy DOES NOT demonstrate better than average clutch hitting???   In fact, it's very poor clutch hitting???

Or, maybe you don't believe in clutch players?  If that's the case, then you don't follow sport enought to comment.  And, I'm not talking about being clutch 100% of the time, I'm talking about having the ability to be more successful in clutch situations than other athletes.

If you don't get 'It', you will never get 'It'.

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Apr 21, 2005 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hey Homey
hope your not directing that comment towards me.You accidentally replied to me right? I do believe in clutch players.

by oakwin2004 on Apr 21, 2005 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, we cannot
Because you are getting too focused on 2-out RISP.

Chavvy with runners on, all situations, bats .287,  With RISP, 0.297.  Hardly "very poor clutch hitting."

by floyd on Apr 21, 2005 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Don't be fooled by bases loaded stats...
Who doesn't hit better with the bases juiced. There is a WAY higher likelyhood of getting a meatball when there is nowhere to put you!!!!

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Apr 21, 2005 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Here's to a better night tonight. ;)
A baseball game is simply a nervous breakdown divided into nine innings. ~Earl Wilson

by baseballgirl on Apr 21, 2005 1:32 PM PDT reply actions  

Don't Get Even - Just get mad... for once!
Just once I want to see Chavey get mad - throw a helmet in the dugout, get tossed for arguing balls and strikes... show some kind of emotion other than politely walking off. I know that he's a humble guy and for the most part, that's why we like him so much, but your leader's got to have an ego and show some emotion. What happened to the bad ass he wanted to be last year?

by thebigbz on Apr 21, 2005 1:42 PM PDT reply actions  

He threw his helmet and bat
after the K last night.
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Apr 21, 2005 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

He Tossed It
I'm talking about a healthy slam.

by thebigbz on Apr 21, 2005 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sexson (i think)
sure was pissed last night after striking out to Street.  You could tell that he was cursing.
"Put a Milo on him."
-Billy Beane

by kaweahkaweah on Apr 21, 2005 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

no emotion..
..is due to that fact that he can only be mad at himself. I think that he knows that he is better than what he has done so far. If he were to start throwing tantrums for his own inefficiencies, he'd come off as a crybaby.
Let's Go Oakland!

by AllThingsOakland on Apr 21, 2005 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

you realize the a's are one game out
of first place, right?

and that it's only 15 games into a 162 game season?

by xbhaskarx on Apr 21, 2005 2:02 PM PDT reply actions  

My take...
...on all of this:
  1. Pitching is more than any of us could have hoped for, including a bullpen.
  2. I don't believe, and I don't think Billy believes, that it is too early to start worrying about the hitting. These games count every bit as much as the last 20, or so.
  3. The lack of hitting was seen last year and I'm surprised something dramatic wasn't done over the winter.Kielty is not the answer.
  4. I like the 'new' tactic of playing small ball. Don't care how the game is won - just win it.
  5. As much as I like Byrnes and the fire in his  eyes, every fly ball to him is an adventure. This may be acceptable if he is winning games  with his bat, but if he isn't.....?
That being said, I look to BB to make the necessary moves to improve the hitting - and soon. He won't let good pitching go unrewarded.

by doubleplayer on Apr 21, 2005 3:11 PM PDT reply actions  

Chavy's throw
My point earlier was based on the mindset of chavy - i love the guy to death, and what comforts me is that his biggest hurdle to becoming a superstar is confidence, which can certainly be resolved. But, that throw, like his comments at the beginning of the season regarding not having a strong arm, just don't make sense, given his four consecutive gold gloves.
just go for it... it's pretty f'ing obvious to the rest of us you can make those plays, so stop questioning yourself.
Maybe something i haven't even heard of before...

by slapnuts on Apr 21, 2005 3:16 PM PDT reply actions  

Can I just take issue with
the "every game counts the same in the standings" logic? Numerically, of course it does. But there is a flow to a season, same as there is to a novel or play.

In April, you let Haren pitch out of a jam, learn from it, maybe at the expense of a game; in Sept, you might not. In April, you assess, come together as a unit, adjust; in Sept, you overcome fatigue on adrenaline for the "stretch drive."

You wouldn't want a writer to make every chapter dramatic and conclusive like the last chapter will be; you don't approach a speech with an "every word counts the same" mentality.

Baseball is a marathon of ebbs, flows, adjustments, and endurance. It's not about today, and it is NEVER about yesterday.

Nico

by Nico on Apr 21, 2005 4:23 PM PDT reply actions  

Deep...
...Very, very deep...and pretty clutch, too.
Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Apr 21, 2005 4:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nico
That's one of the best comments EVER on AN.  Ever.  Proof there is clutch commenting.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Apr 21, 2005 5:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

not only are you right
but just the anecdotal evidence from the a's over the last few years supports you.

previous teams started out slowly and had great augusts and septembers.

the 04 team struggled in september and didn't make the playoffs.

this is a young team, they should be in good position to finish strong this year.  

by xbhaskarx on Apr 21, 2005 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

small sample size on Nico's clutchness!!
But I happen to agree with Nico (rhymes with knee-coal).

Also, perhaps more importantly, the last month of a season is very different from the first because you need the first part of the season to figure out what your actual strengths and weaknesses are. The last month, you usually know what you've got and you've made your July trades and people know their roles. [Last year was an exception that I blame entirely on Mulder's meltdown.]  You can't expect the A's to improve without trying people out and pushing them. Thus, the attempts to put Street in more intense situations, bringing in Cruz with a 5-run lead, etc.

Our A's are going to have to fail sometimes and learn from it, before they can succeed. Some of our fans just need to vent and rave and attack the A's personally to help them get through the sometimes painful learning process.

Having said that, I really appreciate some of us labeling diaries as 'rants', so those who need ranting can go there, and those who don't can skip it!

by Apricot on Apr 21, 2005 5:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Totally agree, Apricot
which sort of means I agree with myself, I suppose. But I like your elaboration.

I also greatly appreciate the labeled "rants diaries" because ranting doesn't bother me if it's qualified as such; then it's nicely therapeutic. A win-win situation (kind of like having a Seattle outfielder cloned.)

Nico

by Nico on Apr 21, 2005 6:14 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Aperture_logo_small
Community Prospect List #4
Img_2672_small
Long-Term Outlook

Recent FanPosts

Small
Comcast needs two Hotstove shows!
Small
Moneyball Part II: Billy Beane Shocks the World. Again.
Hahaha_small
Let's Make Some Nicknames!
Fubarcloud_small
Wolf being told to spend money
Small
The wRC+ Challenge
Pumpkin_small
Maybe this is a stupid stats question
Small
A's reportedly sign Cespedes
Unknown_small
Is It Really Worth It: Three Veterans Who May Be Playing Oakland Next Year, But Shouldn't Be
Small
Manny's Contract

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Josefav2_small danmerqury

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late