Athletics Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

David Forst Spring Training Q&A

A's Assistant General Manager David Forst recently took some time away from what is likely the A's toughest spring training in recent years (in terms of roster decisions and position battles) to answer some questions for Athletics Nation.

While it's too early to make too many evaluations, I went ahead and asked about position battles and young players nonetheless.

I want to express my sincere gratitude to David Forst for taking the time.  Enjoy.

Blez:  Let me start off with a personal question.  I recently interviewed Susan Slusser and she said you got married this offseason. Congratulations on that!  But she also said that she didn't think you had time to take a honeymoon yet.  Have you?

David Forst: Thanks for your congratulations, Tyler.  Yes, my wife Rebe and I were married in November, and, no, we haven't had a chance to go on a honeymoon yet.  The day after our wedding I had to fly to Florida for the GM meetings and she had to return to Phoenix where she is clerking for a federal judge.  It's not a honeymoon exactly, but spending all of spring training together in beautiful Arizona is not a bad consolation prize.  (Though I'm told I still owe her a trip to Hawaii after the World Series.)

Blez: How has camp been so far? The A's young pitching has performed well. Between Blanton, Meyer and Haren, who would you say has had the best camp thus far?

DF: Camp has been great so far.  We were really looking forward to this spring as much as any since I've been here because of all the new faces as well as all the decisions we knew we'd have to make as far as the roster is concerned.  As for the young pitchers, all three have impressed in the few short weeks we've been here.  Haren is an intimidating figure out on the mound, Blanton has shown the poise and presence that helped him move so quickly through our system, and Meyer made some great adjustments between his two starts to this point and showed an outstanding fastball and change up in his outing against the Giants today (3/9).

Blez: Chad Bradford going to down to an injury seemed to open the door for an extra reliever to make the team.  Many in AN are calling for Huston Street already especially given his performance thus far.  Will the arbitration clock timing enter into your decision here at all?  Or will the best pitcher win the spot?  Who else is right up there in your mind?

DF: There are certainly outside factors that play into the decision of who makes the opening day roster, but we are always committed to going into the season with our best 25 guys.  In a division that has been decided by just 1 game a couple of times in the last 5 years, we know that game #1 is just as important as game #162.  Huston definitely has opened some eyes here early in camp, but so have Jimmy Serrano, Kirk Saarloos, and Tyler Johnson.  I think the depth of our bullpen is going to be a strength for us this year, and clearly important in the face of losing Chad for a couple of months.

Blez:  What are some other names that have already opened eyes of the front office?  Suzuki seems to be both raking and is also 3 for 3 in gunning down would be base stealers.

DF: Kurt has definitely made the most of his opportunity so far in big league camp, showing off his arm as well as a solid approach at the plate.  Omar Quintanilla has drawn raves from Ron Washington for his work in the infield thus far and Richie Robnett put on an early display in BP that had a lot of the coaches talking.  It's always fun to get a quick glimpse of the future of the organization here in the first few weeks of Spring.

Blez: Has this A's camp been different from A's camps in the past in terms of atmosphere?

DF: I think there's been a little more competition in this camp than any in the last few years which always brings a different element to camp.  But it's a healthy competition, and our guys have responded well and certainly seem to be up to the challenge.

Blez:  How often have you been checking in on Hudson and Mulder to see their names in the box scores?  Or have you already kind of divorced yourself from that?

DF: We truly haven't looked back since we made those deals in December, so to be honest, other than Peter Gammons' brief mention of Mulder's first start in his ESPN.com article, it's not something we've concerned ourselves with.

Blez:  Mark Ellis seems to have come back better than ever.  Even though it's only spring games, how impressive is what Ellis is accomplishing?  Does he have the inside track right now over Ginter and Scutaro because of his defense?  And how do you think his throwing strength is?

DF: Mark has been very impressive during the first week of games.  No one ever doubted how hard he worked over the last 12 months, and we always felt that if anyone could get himself back into playing shape after this traumatic injury, it was Ellie.  He's had outstanding at bats, consistently driving the ball to all fields, and has already made some plays in the field that have demonstrated the strength he has built up in that shoulder.  Like I said before, there are some excellent competitions going on in camp right now, and Mark has definitely been up to the challenge.

Blez:  Do you think the team is going to struggle for power this year?  Will too many teams be able to pitch around Chavez?  The team finally seems to be a real strong OBP-type team which I'm sure is by design.

DF: We're not concerned with the power on the club.  It's not hard to see us hitting 135+ HR's between Chavez, Durazo, Crosby, Swisher, Ginter, and Byrnes alone, and we expect the rest of the lineup to do their fair share.  Hopefully, you're right about the OBP of this club - adding Kendall to the already strong on base talents of Kotsay, Hatteberg, Chavez, Durazo, et al should be fun to watch.

Blez:  The outfield situation is interesting.  Since Kielty has had the injury, it's seemed to have quieted the Byrnes trade rumors.  Byrnes has been hitting the ball well, seemingly laying off the outside pitch from righthanders.  Thomas has also performed well.  And Matt Watson has made the most of his at-bats.  How do see the outfield shaping up right now?

DF: Another of the exciting decisions we have to make before opening day is how to find playing time for a group of very talented outfielders.  Like you said, Byrnes, Thomas, and Watson have all performed well up until this point, Kotsay is clearly our center fielder, and Swisher's minor league track record and successful September call-up indicate that he is destined for big things.  As for Kielty, the medical staff expects he'll be cleared for play in games by this weekend, so he should be caught up on AB's shortly.  Without a doubt, it's going to take all of March for Ken Macha and the staff to sort out the situation in the outfield.

Blez:  How much of a relief was it to see Meyer come back and pitch the way he did today as opposed to his first outing?

DF: No one here is making a decision based on one outing, whether it is the first or last of the spring.  I'm sure it took some pressure off of Dan to have a few good innings under his belt, so that's always a good thing.

Blez:  What do you think of the pen and how it's shaping up?  Is it as you expected when you consummated the deals?

DF: With all of these guys just throwing an inning at a time and still just working on getting their mechanics straightened out, it's a bit too early to say whether things are shaping up the way we expect them to.  That said, the guys we have brought in (Calero, Cruz, Yabu) have looked good and we're looking forward to seeing them get stretched out as the spring goes on.

Blez:  How's Tyler Johnson looked so far?  Is it more tempting to keep him on the roster to give you additional left-handed support in the pen besides Rincon?  Or do you believe that a pen like Anaheim's that didn't even have a left-hander last year, can work?

DF: Tyler's been impressive, showing off a live FB and excellent off-speed stuff.  He'll have plenty of opportunities during the rest of the month to earn a spot in the revamped bullpen.  We've had anywhere from 0-3 lefties in the pen over the last 5 or so years, so the decision will come down to performance more than some need to fill out the roles in our pen.

Blez: There was a story in the Oakland Tribune today that said that Damian Miller would sometimes ignore the pitching gameplan in 2004 and do his own thing on the mound.  Is that accurate?  How is Jason Kendall behind the dish?  Is he everything advertised and will he stick to the gameplan laid out by Curt Young and the pitcher on the mound?

DF: From everything we've seen and heard from the guys in the clubhouse, Kendall has been as advertised behind the plate.  Both the pitching and coaching staffs have total confidence in him, and the other catchers in camp can't seem to soak up enough of his knowledge.  I expect A's fans are going to absolutely love watching this guy play.

Blez:  The past two years Ken Macha has seemed to call for more situational at-bats and  possibly small ball, but he drops it when the season starts. Since the team isn't built around power and does have some good speed this year (Thomas, Byrnes, Kotsay, even Kendall), do you see more stolen base attempts, bunting and that kind of baseball?

DF: Well, I hope we see more successful stolen bases rather than just "stolen base attempts."  We've always maintained that the most important thing about so-called "small ball" is executing it correctly, whether it be getting a bunt down, hitting the ball on the ground when a hit and run is on, or getting a good jump to steal a base.  Once you perfect the execution, then you can use those things as weapons in the right situations.  The guys you mentioned have the capability to put pressure on defenses, and I expect Ken will use them appropriately.

Blez:  What do you like about Yabu?  What do you think he might have to improve to win in the majors?

DF: What we like about Yabu, and what interested us when we set out to sign him as a free agent, is the experience he brings to our young team, as both a starter and reliever.  He's been successful for over 10 years in the Japanese Leagues, and we expect that success to translate to our game.  His superb command and outstanding split are what give him the chance to really excel in the American League.

Blez:  How do you feel about this team's chances in 2005 to take the AL West?

DF: We've put a lot of time and effort into building this team, and we certainly didn't do it not to compete.  We will go through the ups and downs that a young team inevitably goes through, but we also expect to be in the thick of things.  Ken and his great staff are incredibly proud, and they certainly don't expect anything less than to be in the race in September.  I think the same can be said of the 50+ guys who are in our clubhouse right now: they all take a lot of pride in their work and will do whatever it takes to bring another winning team to Oakland.

Blez:  And finally, I'm going to ask a few people this.  Who do you expect to have the most wins by the end of the year between Zito, Mulder, Hudson and Harden?  How about ERA?

DF:  I don't know, but you can probably guess which two I'm rooting for.

Thanks so much, David.  We really appreciate your time here in AN.  

Good luck on getting to Hawaii.  I know A's fans are hoping you'll be heading there AFTER a huge celebration.

0 recs  |  Comment 37 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I might be reading too much into this, but...
"It's not hard to see us hitting 135+ HR's between Chavez, Durazo, Crosby, Swisher, Ginter, and Byrnes alone"

Does this mean that Ginter is more likely to get the nod at 2d?

Once again, this is another stellar interview Blez!

"The sun don't shine on the same dog's ass all the time." -Catfish Hunter

by kaweahkaweah on Mar 10, 2005 4:20 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Praise for Dakota
But came up short of saying he had an inside track... in a similar vein, once again the only outfielder named as having an assured job is Kotsay. Also dodged the Miller question. Very interesting interview.
The triple of Jeremy Brown's imagination was, in reality, a home run.

by ArakSOT on Mar 10, 2005 4:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ginter
got 19 HR's as a backup last year, is probably what he means.

Still would like the question about Tylor Johnsons rights not being got in the Mulder trade answered though.

"I still stand firm that Johnny Damon is really Jesus, The Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer..."

by Zonis on Mar 10, 2005 4:21 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I believe we claimed Johnson before
the Mulder trade took place.  That isn't to say that we weren't in negotionations with the Cards at the time - it was only about 5 days.

by Captain on Mar 10, 2005 6:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Forst
Well, Forst seems not to want to give anything away, which makes for a pretty bland interview. The only useful nuggets I could glean are:
  1. Several roster decisions still haven't been made, and they will ultimately involve Macha and the coaches, not just the front office (unless you think he's just blowing smoke about this).
  2. The comment about putting the best 25 guys out there strongly suggests that Street will make the big league club (with the same caveat as above).

by andeux on Mar 10, 2005 4:22 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

decent interview
and notice the dodge on the Damien Miller question. Very classy not to dump on him after he's gone, but it sucks for us inquiring minds!

by Apricot on Mar 10, 2005 4:23 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Miller question
I agree that Forst was classy not to dump on Miller, but you're wrong that it sucks for us inquiring minds.  If Miller's game calling were NOT one of the factors in letting him go, Forst would have said something bland and pleasant about it.

"We had no problem with Damian's play calling.  We would have loved to have him back this year, but ... the reality ... economics ... different direction ... a unique opportunity ... time move on ... whatever."  You see that sort of thing all the time.

The fact that instead he dodged the question entirely tells me everything I need to know.

by iglew on Mar 10, 2005 8:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

kremlinology lives
You are one suspicious guy.

Though I admit I thought the exact same thing.  :)

by Apricot on Mar 10, 2005 9:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

thanks Blez
If you are not careful you are going to spoil us.

by mikedaviswhereareyou on Mar 10, 2005 4:30 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I agree...
that not commenting on Miller was the proper thing to do. I continue to marvel at Blez' ability to get these 'inside' interviews. I don't question the content, either. It's waaay too early for Frost to being saying too much. Clearly, he'll let BB make those statements. BTW, I'll believe the small ball talk when I see it happening.

by doubleplayer on Mar 10, 2005 4:36 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

nice job blez
jp, depo and now forst....the newest student at U of BB....getting his phd in "how to kick ass in MLB"....all these guys knew NOT to talk-out- of-turn and let something slip.  
My CPA says-"Damn, you must really hate this time of year". I said-"Don't worry, I just bought a thousand shares of Astropitch."

by bigelephant on Mar 10, 2005 4:38 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

good questions
...but not much in the way of answers. I read the Ginter comment as meaning they expect he'll get a lot of AB's, but I don't think that means he'll get second base.
  Speaking as a former reporter, I found that when you do an on-the-record interview like this, you get less stuff than when it's on background.

by vk on Mar 10, 2005 5:04 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

i'd agree
forst didn't seem to want to give anything away.  

thanks blez!

by sec119 on Mar 10, 2005 5:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks and I
Realize that it is still very early in the spring.  So much hasn't been decided yet.  And I'm sure if it has, he wasn't going to want the players to find out about it here :-)

by Tyler Bleszinski on Mar 10, 2005 5:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

On-the-record vs. background
As a recovering journalist, I totally agree as to which approach provides the more valuable info....of course, there's always the jokers who will answer a sensitive question and suddenly say, "Um, that's off the record". Um, sorry, that's not the way it works....if you're on the record and you don't want something attributed to you, *don't say it!*
"All things end badly; otherwise, they wouldn't end..."

by bakedzito on Mar 10, 2005 7:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Great interview
Forst has too much class to say anything bad about anybody, and he's not going to tip off any decisions before they're official. But a lot of good info comes through.

by matthias on Mar 10, 2005 6:43 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Awesome interview....
It was very informative. I have a question though (and ignore my ignornace, I've never known what it was)... What's a hit and run? It's a play on MVP baseball but I don't know what it is. And since it's a small ball move, I can assume the A's rarely do it...
Jack Sparrow: [to Weatherby Swann] I think we've all arrived at a very special place. Spiritually, ecumenically, grammatically.

by GreenNGoldGirl on Mar 10, 2005 9:19 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

The runner starts moving
with the assumption that the hitter will be putting the ball in play.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Mar 10, 2005 9:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Completely pardoned
The baserunner takes off with the pitch, the batter has to swing, no matter where it is, hoping to make contact and get the runner an extra base or two.
devo's gf: "what is it that you write about all day when they don't even play any games?"

by devo on Mar 10, 2005 9:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

more detail
Yes, this is classic small ball. The classic version starts with a runner on first. The 1B is covering 1st, so there is a hole on the right side of the field.  The runner breaks on the pitch, hoping that the 2B will cover second base. If the batter can just punch the ball to the right side of the field, it should be a single since there is a big gap there, resulting in 1st and 3rd. Of course, when the A's do it, the batter usually misses and the runner gets thrown out at 2nd.  :(

by Apricot on Mar 10, 2005 9:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

something i pray for
(now that the a's are on some wacky "christian" radio station) more hit-and-running. i'm not advocating base stealing- just more agressive base running.

 

My CPA says-"Damn, you must really hate this time of year". I said-"Don't worry, I just bought a thousand shares of Astropitch."

by bigelephant on Mar 11, 2005 9:03 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Great Interview.... Blez
Forst was as candid as I thought he would be at this stage in spring training and in his career.  Billy would have his head if he blurted out anything.

His commments about Street lead me to hope that he will make the squad.  Would have loved to have seen him in Des Moines, but he belongs with the A's.  

Keep up the good work.

by street69 on Mar 10, 2005 9:25 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

As we nioticed
He  said that the best 25 players will make the roster. Some people are assuming this means Street because he has been so good, but there is also stuff we don't see. He noted that Jimmy Serrano (seen him complimented by Macha a few times), Kirk Saarloos and Tyler Johnson have opened up eyes in camp. No matter what he says, Macha likes having two leftys, and the rule V part also helps him. Serrano has done well, and Sarloos too. Even if he said the best 25 men, they are always thinking about the future which might mean Serrano or Sarloos will make the last spot (both have ML experience). This is assuming the only one of Meyer/Blanton makes the bigs and Yabu takes the last starting spot.
Peace up, A-Town Down (A town being Albany California, not Atlanta)

by ohad on Mar 11, 2005 2:11 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Macha
If Macha has his way, I doubt Tyler Johnson will be on the roster. Tyler will only be kept if the A's have him in their plans for the future, and we all know Macha is not a part of that future...

by OaktownTribesman on Mar 11, 2005 6:44 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Why?
Why won't TJ be on there if Macha has his way? I've seen quotes from Macha about how he's impressed them over there. Macha likes two lefties in the pen.

Tyler should be in the plans for the future, since Rincon will likely be gone next year. All logic and common sense point to TJ being on the roster.

Peace up, A-Town Down (A town being Albany California, not Atlanta)

by ohad on Mar 11, 2005 7:29 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If he doesn't
we essentially gave the Cards some money by spending our time and resources training the guy and giving him playing time - you know if he don't make the 25, STL will snatch him back.

by Captain on Mar 11, 2005 7:57 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yup......
Peace up, A-Town Down (A town being Albany California, not Atlanta)

by ohad on Mar 11, 2005 8:24 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Rule Five
The recent history of the Rule Five draft shows that the majority of players selected are returned and never amount to much anyway. In 2002 we selected Mike Neu and Rontrez Johnson, and traded for a third Rule Five guy, Buddy Hernandez. Of the three, only Mike Neu stuck, and where is he now? Languishing in the Marlins' farm system. In 2003 we took lefty Frank Brooks. We traded him to the Red Sox during ST, and he didn't stick with them either, so he was returned to the Pirates. He was put on waivers and released this offseason. So it's nothing new or unusual if Beane offers Tyler Johnson back to the Cardinals.

by OaktownTribesman on Mar 11, 2005 9:35 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That reminds me
If the A's don't want to keep Tyler Johnson yet are too cheap to give up the 25,000, they can trade him to another team that might have a use for him. That team would then be on the hook for the 25,000 if he goes back to the Cards.

by OaktownTribesman on Mar 11, 2005 9:38 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

What do you do all day
that you have time to do such in-depth research?  Good info, though.

I'm not saying Rule 5 is why he should make the roster.  But if he doesn't (whether he amounts to anything in the future or not) we wasted a slot on him that we could have used on someone else in our system.  Don't ask me who.

by Captain on Mar 11, 2005 11:38 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

exactly
look at chris mabeus last year. texas takes him on a rule 5. they wanted to keep him-just not on the texas roster. they ask the a's to trade him back and the a's said no so back comes mabeus.
My CPA says-"Damn, you must really hate this time of year". I said-"Don't worry, I just bought a thousand shares of Astropitch."

by bigelephant on Mar 11, 2005 10:06 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

t johnson
stunk it up on thursday...there was a very good reason he was in AA-he has "walkitous"...a very dangerous affliction for a MLB reliever.

said from day 1, macha will not "carry" johnson like he did neu in '03.

My CPA says-"Damn, you must really hate this time of year". I said-"Don't worry, I just bought a thousand shares of Astropitch."

by bigelephant on Mar 11, 2005 9:08 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Blez - a question
You asked the question about Miller, and immediately followed up with the question about Kendall. The two questions are related, in that they explored how each catcher relates to the pitchers and the game plan, but the Kendall part was a gimme while the Miller part solicited criticism. Like any politician (and club officials always have to be at least partly politicians) Forst just ran with the easy part of the question and pretended the harder part didn't exist. In general, if you want an answer to a relatively difficult question, it has to be asked as a stand-alone question, not part of something else.

My question is, did you run the two questions together intentionally, in order to offer Forst a graceful way of avoiding the Miller question if he so chose? I'd be critical of such solicitude from a "regular" journalist, but I don't think it's inappropriate for a fanblog site, which combines elements of journalism with elements of fandom and advocacy.

I don't mean to put you on the spot--I think you're doing a fine job and I visit AN every day because you provide such an interesting and useful site. I'm just curious about your methods here.

Of course, it could be that I'm applying way too much of what Apricot calls "Kremlinology" here, and you weren't really thinking about any of that.  :-)

by Faust on Mar 11, 2005 5:07 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Next interview
Hey Blez, I liked this interview, but a suggestion if you want answers that are a bit more revealing: next time, interview like a clubhouse attendant or a secretary or somebody not as high ranking. I'm sure you'll get some really juicy info... :)

by OaktownTribesman on Mar 11, 2005 6:52 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Or
the assistant to the traveling secretary

by Captain on Mar 11, 2005 7:59 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Thank You Blez
Especially for the question about more small ball.  I like the way Mr. Forst described it as a "weapon" to be used in the right situations...something the A's have not done effectively for a long time.  

by Mission1929 on Mar 11, 2005 7:21 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms
Start posting about the Athletics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Me_at_att_park_small
Greener Grass, Episode 7: Transportation Proclamation
Depaulbluedemons_small
Community Prospect List #18
413niegoftl__sl500_aa280__small
A's Protect Carter, FDLS, Figueroa and Souza from Rule V
Countdown_small
Some things I am "coming around" on...
Imgp0089_editedagasin_small
DLD 11/17/09 - Nintendo 64 and a Nerd's top 10 Epic Movie Fights

Recent FanPosts

Small
The A's Move to Oakland in 1968
Funny-pictures12_small
If Jack Cust Traded, Then To Whom And For What?
Small
Jack Cust Drawing Trade Interest?
Me_at_att_park_small
Old McPherson is an A, e yi e yi yoooooooo
Bill_king_small
On Trading Catchers....
Depaulbluedemons_small
Community Prospect List #17

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Tyler_at_maya_school_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

As_kings_cal_small louismg

Editors

Countdown_small Taj Adib

Ziegler160px_small Flashfire

527918550406_0_bg_small notsellingjeans