Unhappy Tejada wants to be traded
[EDITOR'S NOTE - Here's a fascinating story that's sure to make A's fans believe we can make like Marty McFly and go back in time. I give my input below, as unpopular as it might be. - Blez]
Miggy apparently wants out of Baltimore after only two seasons. This will naturally make A's fans want to try and get him back.
SANTO DOMINGO, Dominican Republic (AP) - Baltimore Orioles shortstop Miguel Tejada said Thursday he's unhappy with the team's direction and wants to be traded."I've been with the Orioles for two years and things haven't gone in the direction that we were expecting, so I think the best thing will be a change of scenery," Tejada told The Associated Press during a telephone interview in his native Dominican Republic.
Tejada signed a $72 million, six-year contract with the Orioles before the 2004 season.
He hit .304 with 26 home runs and 98 RBIs this year, but Baltimore finished 21 games behind the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox in the AL East.
"I've done many things with this team and I haven't seen results, and the other teams are getting stronger while the Orioles have not made any signings to strengthen the club," Tejada said.
Boston traded shortstop Edgar Renteria to the Atlanta Braves on Thursday for third base prospect Andy Marte.
Tejada came to Baltimore after playing seven years with the Oakland Athletics.
0 recs |
199 comments
Comments
Ellis for Tejada straight up!!!!!!!
by capper3 on Dec 8, 2005 4:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
tejada
Manny for miggy? Then trade manny for pitching?
by sctr76 on Dec 9, 2005 5:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking
by IndianaAsfan on Dec 9, 2005 9:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Beat me to it Brian
by grover on Dec 8, 2005 4:33 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'd love that.
by arch on Dec 8, 2005 4:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Pipe Dream
by norcaldevilasu on Dec 8, 2005 4:34 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Just occured to me
How about this for a blockbuster?
Miggy for Manny.
by grover on Dec 8, 2005 4:37 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Miggy for Manny
by RunRickeyRun on Dec 8, 2005 4:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was probably sadder to see Tejada leave
by OaklandSi on Dec 8, 2005 4:37 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I agree
by westsideclubbin on Dec 9, 2005 9:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, good point
Matt, who has been to Oakland and finds its negative reputation to be unfounded in a lot of ways.
by TwistNHook on Dec 9, 2005 9:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
wow life would be great
by nickatt7 on Dec 8, 2005 4:38 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Tejada for Chavvy!
by BleacherDrummer on Dec 8, 2005 4:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
The best trade proposal,
by arch on Dec 8, 2005 4:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Booo
The time to pick a winning team was when he was a free agent. He chose to sign a long term contract with a team coming off six straight fourth place finishes, a team that shares a division with the Red Sox and Yankees. For that decision, he made a whole lot of money.
As Jack Aubrey might say, he has chosen his cake and must lie in it - or is it, he has made his bed and must eat it?
by matthias on Dec 8, 2005 4:41 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
if I remember correctly
by OaklandSi on Dec 8, 2005 4:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sadly, agree
Tejada's time in Oakland is over, and I'll always remember those days fondly. But there's no way we pick up that contract for Tejada's decline phase.
by salb918 on Dec 8, 2005 4:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Decline phase?
by grover on Dec 8, 2005 4:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
that's presuming ...
by monkeyball on Dec 8, 2005 5:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Age
by grover on Dec 8, 2005 5:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
DR papers
by OaktownTribesman on Dec 8, 2005 5:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Some big name prospects have
You telling me they couldn't drop the $500 bucks it would take to get some A1 fake ID?
by grover on Dec 8, 2005 5:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed...
I loved Miggy, but this kinda makes me not like him anymore. Hes just another player who took the money and ran, and when things are going bad, he wants out. Why not stick it out? Support you team Miggy. Its not like the Orioles havent tried. They brought in Sosa, palmeiro, javvy Lopez. Suck it up dude. At least your making 70 million.
by SoCal As Fan on Dec 8, 2005 5:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure he could have taken less...
by easyraider on Dec 8, 2005 5:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Because he was too expensive.
by Ozzz on Dec 9, 2005 1:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Officially no offer was made
by easyraider on Dec 9, 2005 3:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The A's announced before his walk year started
So he never had the option to take less money to stay with the A's.
by OaklandSi on Dec 8, 2005 5:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
shoulda had him...
by dpetri2000 on Dec 8, 2005 11:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i accept paypal
by xbhaskarx on Dec 9, 2005 12:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But
by SoCal As Fan on Dec 9, 2005 9:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's the contract dollars
Well, you can lay this whole mess at the feet of the Players' Association. Would Miggy have played for less and stayed in Oakland? Yes, no doubt. Would the PU squawk at a first time FA giving a discount? Big YES! They tried to get after Tony Gwynn, when he only wanted to stay his entire career with one club! But Gwynn had the stature to say, "Get lost PU, I write my own ticket".
Why should anyone sign for more than 2-3 years, if they're good, and REALLY want to win the WS??? You can live pretty well on $6million a year. Why the guarantee for six years? Your agent's happiness??
by Ducts on the Pawn on Dec 8, 2005 4:43 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Tejada had said he wanted a long term contract
by OaklandSi on Dec 8, 2005 4:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And all the owners
Players like Tejada want stability and money because...people tend to like stability and money. Did anyone hassle Chavez about his contract extension? Or Giles about re-signing with the Pads? The MLBPA didn't want ARod tearing up an exiting contract to facilitate a deal, but do you have any examples of any player not being "allowed" to sign for less money or fewer years somewhere by big, bad Donald Fehr? Do you have a link for the Gwynn story you tell? And did anything bad happen to Gwynn because he stayed with SD? Is there some reason someone from the union staff, or another player who's elected to the Executive Committee, shouldn't call him up just to talk about his contract, if that indeed happened?
The vast majority of players realize that, if they weren't organized in a union, and if they start stabbing each other in the back, they'll go back to the Baseball Plantation of yesteryear. These guys aren't all idiots, and blaming Tejada's decision on Fehr or anyone else is an insult to Tejada and to the players as a whole.
by Nick on Dec 8, 2005 5:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bah
Players are just as greedy as the owners on the whole. And yes, Donald Fehr is a total jackass along with most of the player reps.
by WiscoFan on Dec 8, 2005 6:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Tejada whining
by Nick on Dec 8, 2005 6:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, not to make too fine a point
and he wishes to get a lot of money. If he puts a BIGGER priority on anything BUT top dollar, especially if you're A-Rod, or an MVP hitting 30+ HRs, pressure is put upon you to take the "biggest money" deal instead of perhaps taking a (1) shorter term deal (2) less money to play elsewhere. Like with Keith Foulke, he said year-by-year, the diff with Boston seemed not to matter, but his wife said, "Four Million Dollars is aLOT of money!" So he went to Boston for $27 instead of Oakland for $23Million.
No question the players are getting payback for the 120 years of owner parsimony, and it's just in an overall sense. But some carry more of a burden, and some are rewarded MORE than deserved, because of the system the PU set up.
by Ducts on the Pawn on Dec 8, 2005 10:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You think this is bad
by Alon on Dec 8, 2005 7:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LETS GO OAKLAND!
by ConditionOakland on Dec 8, 2005 4:43 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
LOL!
by 510inDenver on Dec 9, 2005 10:10 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
trade
by 415goas on Dec 8, 2005 4:44 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Mora and Tejada
by drudown on Dec 8, 2005 4:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Wait
eagerly waiting...
And yes, I'm very protective of my Daric Barton. He's already my favorite player, and only 3 years older than me.
by Alon on Dec 8, 2005 7:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Because...
I'm not one of the guys who blasts Chavez, and in fact like the guy and am happy to have him on the team. he is however, not in the same league as Tejada. While he is capable of big numbers and has had some nice seasons, I don't think he strikes FEAR into opponents like Tejada does.
Mora would be a more than suitable replacement for him. To give something you have to get something. Any hypothetical deal (and thats all this is) would have to involve Chavez to balance the salaries.
Barton, while obviously the class of our entire minor league system, is still just a minor leaguer. A great one at that, but still a minor leaguer. I wouldn't normally justify mortgaging our future, but Tejada is so exceptional I don't wouldn't see it as mortgaging anything. It would be a calculated gamble- four years of Tejada now vs. 6 or more of Barton later.
The Duke sweetens the pot for the O's, whose bullpen just took a big hit and are in need of quality arms, starter or reliever.
by drudown on Dec 8, 2005 8:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Miggy for
Sincerely,
Gwen Knapp
by RunRickeyRun on Dec 8, 2005 4:47 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Miggy and John Waters
Heck, I'd even throw in JT LeRoy for a commemorative Edgar Allen Poe keychain.
by monkeyball on Dec 8, 2005 4:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Reality check
What if the A's offered a deal centered around Crosby?
by grover on Dec 8, 2005 4:47 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Isn't he 30?
I may get skewered for this but I don't want him back under those circumstances.
by Sharon on Dec 8, 2005 4:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
30 in May 06
by grover on Dec 8, 2005 4:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
eh...
by Cutthemullet on Dec 8, 2005 4:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They've been testing for 2 years now
So either he doesn't juice or he's smart enough to avoid getting caught.
by grover on Dec 8, 2005 5:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If You Believe the Testing is Legit ....
When somebody's been injecting "B-12" for years it raises red flags real fast for me.
I wouldn't take the risk that Miggy is headed on a downward slope, at his "age" and with his "background." (OK, enough with the quotations.)
No matter where our stars go -- Orioles, Yankees, Braves, Cardinals -- they had the most fun in their lives with Oakland, while making much less money.
Lesson 1: Money doesn't make you happy.
Lesson 2: Oakland is a really special place.
by SportySpice on Dec 9, 2005 6:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Lesson 3:
Thus, the sport is still dirty.
by Ozzz on Dec 9, 2005 1:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought they were?
by robber23 on Dec 12, 2005 11:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather have Crosby than Tejada.
by gdubb925 on Dec 8, 2005 5:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather halve Frank Thomas
by monkeyball on Dec 8, 2005 5:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it is pretty much agreeable...
by ConditionOakland on Dec 8, 2005 4:50 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
If we wanted an overpriced shortstop
by rickeytime on Dec 8, 2005 4:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
In no universe
by jeepers on Dec 8, 2005 4:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
oh yeah?
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/dt/furcara01.shtml
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/dt/tejadmi01.shtml
Tejada has a much higher VORP only due to his power, as I mentioned before. Now since Furcal is entering his prime, and Tejeda is beginning to decline, I'd take Furcal's contract over Tejada's any day of the week.
by rickeytime on Dec 8, 2005 5:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the only problem...
How much more is Tejada than Furcal? I'm unsure of their contract specifics.
by ConditionOakland on Dec 8, 2005 5:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Is Tejada lifting the Baltimore clubhouse up?
by Ozzz on Dec 9, 2005 1:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for making my argument
Tejada, age 29: 4 yr/48M, 12M per
Furcal, age 27: 3 yr/39M, 13M per
If Tejada has five more years like this, he's a first ballot Hall of Famer. If Furcal has 7 more years like his, he's getting on the ballot with maybe a token vote or two. It isn't even close.
by jeepers on Dec 8, 2005 5:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
actually, the contract is a key difference
by devo on Dec 8, 2005 5:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's a point in his favor
by jeepers on Dec 8, 2005 5:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Miggie, no question,
by devo on Dec 8, 2005 5:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
PECOTA hasn't been updated to include
They're not even close.
by devo on Dec 8, 2005 5:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
check again
by el generico on Dec 9, 2005 9:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good Lord....
by OaktownPower on Dec 8, 2005 5:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can hear the drums already
Not gonna happen, though. Miggy for Chavy would balance the books, and that's the only way it could work. Not sure we really need to do that.
by jeepers on Dec 8, 2005 4:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
To Hell with the books
by grover on Dec 8, 2005 4:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I hate to say it
by noava22 on Dec 8, 2005 4:55 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
C'mon already...
by grover on Dec 8, 2005 4:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i understand the consternation
by noava22 on Dec 8, 2005 5:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He's been tested for two years
by grover on Dec 8, 2005 5:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
when HGH is included in testing
Also, if I remember correctly, testing isn't "blanket" testing, it's random testing. There is a chance Miggy didn't get tested, no?
by noava22 on Dec 8, 2005 5:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Everyone gets tested
Random means MLB can order testing whenever they want.
by grover on Dec 8, 2005 5:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
OK..but HGH wont be tested next year either...
I despise the rampany rumors on steroids. You have no reason to toss Tejada's name around like that with steroids...it is irresponsible.
by OaktownPower on Dec 8, 2005 5:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't trust anybody in MLB ...
Huddy and Cruz can stay, everybody else needs to get replaced by players who can't afford designer 'roids.
by devo on Dec 8, 2005 5:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Haha...
by OaktownPower on Dec 8, 2005 5:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The point wasn't whether or not he's a worthwhile
In terms of investment, I don't see the point when we already have a great duo up the middle with Ellis and Crosby, with Crosby being a potential superstar and guys like Melillo and Pennington breathing down Ellis' neck for a shot in the bigs. We're deep at 2nd, organizationally, and Bobby is here for years to come.
by noava22 on Dec 8, 2005 5:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
testing
by Cutthemullet on Dec 8, 2005 6:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
well, not that it excuses anything
by devo on Dec 8, 2005 5:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But what about side-effects?
by OaktownTribesman on Dec 8, 2005 6:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Mark McGwire was 37
Miguel Tejada will be 33 when his contract expires.
McGwire battled health problems his entire career.
Tejada has not missed a game in over five years.
McGwire weighed about 275 pounds by the end of his career.
Tejada might tip the scales at 225.
The situations could not be more different.
by devo on Dec 8, 2005 6:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
For the record
by Alon on Dec 8, 2005 7:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
uh, what?
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 8, 2005 7:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i'm pretty sure...
bring tejada back, i'd be so happy!
ps- vote for AN for best sports blog
by rungood on Dec 9, 2005 1:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
juice
let's face it: as nice as he may be, the man has a lot of juice connections for a 5'9" shortstop with a ridiculous amount of power...
by xbhaskarx on Dec 8, 2005 4:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
by rubin sierra on Dec 9, 2005 12:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Um
by TheBigO on Dec 17, 2005 12:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He will be...
by rook on Dec 8, 2005 4:55 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
as of right now... good riddance
i'll still take chavez and crosby over tejada and another 3B any day.
tejada is usually very good august, september, and october, yet this year he SUCKED.
how do we know that's not because of all the extra attention focused on the orioles locker room following the palmiero situation?
by xbhaskarx on Dec 8, 2005 4:56 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Miggy's always been an emotional guy
Man, Fuck the 80's!
by grover on Dec 8, 2005 4:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
or it could have been due to ...
by monkeyball on Dec 8, 2005 5:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll second that...
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 8, 2005 6:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Word up
by salb918 on Dec 8, 2005 7:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
please, let's face reality grover...
how tall is tejada? 5'9". how many guys his size have that much power?
2: palmeiro essentially implicated him. B-12 is a clubhouse code name for steroids that canseco mentions in his book, which was written prior to the palmeiro-tejada thing.
this isn't a criminal trial, we don't need "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" because he's not being sent to prison if found guilty.
people can come up with all the excuses they want (emotional guy), but what is the probability that it's roids and what is the probability that it's something else?
i'm not saying the probability is that high, but is it high enough to avoid an aging (and age unknown) 5'9" shortstop whose performance rapidly declined last year and who has a HUGE contract?
absolutely, 100% without a doubt.
by xbhaskarx on Dec 8, 2005 5:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
For a guy...
by ConditionOakland on Dec 8, 2005 5:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't enjoy implicating miggy
by noava22 on Dec 8, 2005 5:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
improve your grasp of the english language
i'm not saying the probability is that high, but is it high enough to avoid an aging (and age unknown) 5'9" shortstop whose performance rapidly declined last year and who has a HUGE contract?
absolutely, 100% without a doubt.
by xbhaskarx on Dec 8, 2005 5:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
a CHANGE he was a juicer?
But I know what you meant and hear what you're saying. I sure hope that Tejada wasn't a juicer though, and think in this unsure time of "who is" and "who isn't" a steroider, he's as big a risk as anyone we might be interested in.
I say bring back the Rally Miggy! Does anyone else remember that?
by rungood on Dec 9, 2005 1:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Rally Miggy
The best (only?) reason to bring back Miggy as far as I'm concerned.
by iglew on Dec 9, 2005 1:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i remember game I was at
rally miggy = awesome
rally monkey = cowboy up = crap
by rungood on Dec 9, 2005 4:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
refers to a complete misinterpretation
by xbhaskarx on Dec 9, 2005 3:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Reality
They were testing in the first half of 2005 and he performed great.
They were testing in the 2nd half of 2005 and he struggled as the Orioles went into a tailspin.
He also struggled in the first half of 2003 when the A's told him they wouldn't be keeping him beyond the season.
He's had to get a visa every year to come to America. He's passed countless security checks to get those visas. His birth certificate is good enough for Homeland Security but not you?
(Ok... so the age thing is still a legitimate question.)
But if he really is turning 30 next year than you shouldn't have to worry about serious decline before his contract ends in 2009.
by grover on Dec 8, 2005 5:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
2004
by OaktownTribesman on Dec 8, 2005 6:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Point #2
by jeepers on Dec 8, 2005 5:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
he's been right so far
- mcgwire. pretty much everyone thinks he juiced after that embarrassing congressional testimony.
- palmiero.
by xbhaskarx on Dec 8, 2005 5:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was referring to Palmeiro
by jeepers on Dec 8, 2005 5:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
canseco...palmeiro, SAME THING
you're never going to get clean, untainted players fingering each other just for the heck of it. why would they, and be blacklisted like canseco and palmeiro?
all information about steroids in the locker room will come from players who are:
desperate
has beens
or
cheaters
by xbhaskarx on Dec 9, 2005 12:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My point isn't steroids,
His poor second half could have easily been tied the Orioles' losing ways.
doesn't that pretty much put to rest the "Tejada is such a leader!" rap we've been debating for a couple of years? If he's such a leader, why didn't he lead them to stay in the race, rather than collapsing with the rest of the team? If he's such a leader, why is he whining to the media about how lame the team is?
If Chavez had signed somewhere else and had done this, I suspect that a lot of ANers would start talking about how "heartless" he is again. Do Tejada's statements bother those here who think he's a team leader?
by Nick on Dec 8, 2005 5:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The comments are vintage Miggy
When I hear him say that, I recall his fury after the A's lost to the Boston Junior Yankees in 2003. I'd be a lot more concerned about his leadership if he didn't care about the ineptitude of Oriole management.
by jeepers on Dec 8, 2005 5:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the Orioles have no idea what they're doing
What this statement comes down to, for me, is Miggy essentially saying that he's a winner, but the rest of the Orioles roster isn't.
by monkeyball on Dec 8, 2005 5:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Baltimore had no pitching!
It would require a lot of dexterity and versatility to pull that team out. Maybe Bugs Bunny could have pulled it off, but not many others.
by grover on Dec 8, 2005 5:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But what happens in the clubhouse?
My main complaint isn't primarily with Tejada himself, though -- it's more with the whole "leader/not a leader" issue in the first place. I just think that when the O's and Miggy were hot last year, people said the reason was Tejada's grit and leadership, which was contrasted with Chavez's "lack of heart" and the A's' awful record. But when the O's tanked, I don't remember people saying that Tejada was in a leadership slump.
by Nick on Dec 8, 2005 6:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's a good point
"quotes": the new semi-colon! :-).
by jeepers on Dec 8, 2005 6:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
leader/not a leader
2003 was especially painful. If Tejada (and Byrnes) had traded a little of that "heart" for some brains, we would have swept the Sox. That didn't detract from what he had accomplished previously, but for me it made it easy to watch him leave.
by andeux on Dec 8, 2005 6:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well put
by OaktownTribesman on Dec 8, 2005 6:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In other words,
by rubin sierra on Dec 9, 2005 1:03 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll take either of the Wicked Witches
Consistency, strong peripheral stats.
Dorothy was the Marco Scutaro of the movie: "clutch," but ultimately a lucky lightweight.
by monkeyball on Dec 9, 2005 8:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Whole-heartedly agree
by OaktownTribesman on Dec 8, 2005 6:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I call it both.
by jeepers on Dec 8, 2005 6:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
did he say this before or after they signed Ramon?
by Cutthemullet on Dec 8, 2005 5:03 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Practically guaranteed
by grover on Dec 8, 2005 5:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
maybe
What every happened to him, anyways?
by ConditionOakland on Dec 8, 2005 5:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
last news i can find
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 8, 2005 6:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
by LowcountryJoe on Dec 8, 2005 5:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
He's just frustrated..understandably....
by OaktownPower on Dec 8, 2005 5:35 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
If the season started today...
by jeepers on Dec 8, 2005 5:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This all depends on the timing...
Or
This could be the final straw for Ramon getting the contract done (O's had to concede) or Miggy hates the way Ramon blocks the plate and knows they are giving 28MM for an offensive minded catcher, when they are already offensive, and need pitching/defense to win.
by rook on Dec 8, 2005 6:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
That would be smart indeed ...
by rubin sierra on Dec 9, 2005 1:07 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Have to ask..
Or sitting around in the Dominican is shorts, drinking Mai Tai's and complaining to AP about how your team has done nothing to improve the team, despite their best efforts. It's not like the O's haven't been in on every deal this winter, it's just that NO ONE wants to go play there, because their pitching sucks, err is young..., and really besides Miggy/Mora what do they have?
by rook on Dec 9, 2005 9:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Think about it though....
Ramon and Tejada traded back to Oak at the deadline for Loaiza, Kendall, Kennedy, Scutaro, and Garcia.
Boy, that would make some heads turn. lol Again, nothing more than a funny thought.
by PosterNutbag44 on Dec 8, 2005 6:08 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm all for bringing Miggy back
by Helloooo 1st on Dec 8, 2005 6:11 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I've said this many times
I could be wrong about Crosby, but he had a stretch last season where he looked just as good as Tejada at his best. And it was HIS SECOND YEAR. He'll still be a bit inconsistent, but when he puts it all together, Crosby is going to be just remarkable.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Dec 8, 2005 6:44 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I loved Tejada. A lot.
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 8, 2005 7:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
my heart would burst with joy
It is a nice thought though.....
But we can not run the team based upon what the heart wants aside from aiming for a winning team.
by Athletics fan and runner on Dec 8, 2005 7:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
agreed 100%
by monkeyball on Dec 9, 2005 8:35 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't deal Croz either
- Trade Chavez or Zito for him straight up. The money would work. However, Zito wouldn't want to sign there, and either prospect makes for a potentially disastrous clubhouse situation. It's the more doubtful of the two.
- Trade Mark Ellis, Jay Payton, and a good prospect or two for him. This way is more feasible, although it still has a lot of problems. You would need to count on Ethier or Kielty, or some combination, to cover Payton's spot. And, you would have to get either Chavez, Crosby or Tejada to move to second base. Plus, although the money wouldn't be terrible short-term if you add up Payton's $4.5 and Ellis' yet-to-be-determined, but possibly $3M salary, you'd be committed for three more years. The result would be letting Zito walk and not getting another bat for next year (beyond Miggy, of course).
by jeepers on Dec 8, 2005 7:01 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Chavez at 2B
by iglew on Dec 9, 2005 1:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
GLad he is miserable
Screw you Tejada!!!
And before you say the A's never offered him a contract. Billy would have for 4 years 3 million each. Plenty of money to survive.
by novaoakland on Dec 8, 2005 7:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Someone's bitter.
My advice to you--get up early tomorrow, watch the sunrise and embrace nature for all that she is, and then I gurantee that the bitterness will have left you.
Just my advice, though.
by Czech Micah on Dec 8, 2005 8:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well
by salb918 on Dec 8, 2005 8:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I would be bitter,
by Czech Micah on Dec 8, 2005 8:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
would you give up $60 million?
by drudown on Dec 8, 2005 8:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hell no I would not give up 60
He is a greedy bastard and a dumb one at that if he thought those idiots would ever win.
by novaoakland on Dec 8, 2005 10:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So weak...
by OaktownPower on Dec 8, 2005 11:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why is crap please explain.
Totaly childish. Am I missing something. Why is his situation not his fault?
by novaoakland on Dec 8, 2005 11:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
so it's his fault
by rubin sierra on Dec 9, 2005 1:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Besides...
by LD on Dec 9, 2005 11:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Damn.
I'd love Miggy back (no injuries? Hell yeah!), but not gonna happen.
by Kyli on Dec 8, 2005 7:06 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Frankly
by AinOz on Dec 8, 2005 7:45 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I imagine he feels lied to...
by OaktownPower on Dec 8, 2005 11:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No
by OaktownTribesman on Dec 9, 2005 5:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He has 60m tissues to dry his eyes with.
by Ozzz on Dec 9, 2005 2:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
crack
by asch on Dec 8, 2005 7:56 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Let's be Real
the last team they would trade him to would be the A's. Face saving is alive and well.
And how could the A's possibly afford his salary? Only if we traded Zito and Ellis, which would help the team offensively but hurt its pitching and defense (Just who would play 2B?) or, even better, Chavez, essentially undoing the decision of 3 years ago to stick with the younger player (and just who would play 3B??)
To quote a former President (or at least his SNL imitator)-- nah gonna happen.
by oaktoon on Dec 8, 2005 7:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
He's not going anywhere
by What Would Rickey Do on Dec 8, 2005 8:15 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts exactly--
by Nico on Dec 8, 2005 9:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I really hate to be a spoilsport...
by Squeaky on Dec 8, 2005 8:43 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
white sox had...
by David Owen on Dec 8, 2005 9:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
From the O's POV,
by Nico on Dec 8, 2005 9:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I do not concur with the choice...
Nah, nah, na-na, nah...
by LowcountryJoe on Dec 9, 2005 7:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The suggestion earlier in the thread
by camperdog on Dec 8, 2005 10:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
new infield?
ss miggy
3b croz
1b chavy
just funnin'
by A s Eh on Dec 8, 2005 10:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
umm,
2b ellis
ss croz
3b miggy
1b chavez
or 3b chavez, 1b miggy
first situation if chavez's shoulder sucks
second if it does not
by jacobo2u on Dec 8, 2005 11:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
1B would "spare" Chavez's shoulder with
Probably help his power hitting in the process.
Worth trying if his bat gets consistent.
by A s Eh on Dec 8, 2005 11:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah right.
by CyberFT on Dec 8, 2005 10:50 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Much as I love Miggy, if the O's do trade
by OaklandSi on Dec 9, 2005 1:19 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
One can always dream
These rumors will do nothing to help me sleep at night. Oh Tejada, I know it'll never happen but Oakland loves you more than that skank Baltimore ever will!
by limecat on Dec 9, 2005 7:00 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Aaaaaaaand...
I loved Miggy. Was sad to see him go. Hold no ill will toward him (unlike Giambi). But really, wipe your tears with hundred dollar bills and shut the hell up, Miguel. I'm sorry you're not playing for a winner, but in the larger scheme of things, the complaints of a ridiculously rich and pampered athlete become less important every day.
Sorry, we all get frustrated at work - but how many of us can console ourselves with the fact that we're millionaires, what, 70 times over?
Okay, maybe Blez and Nico. But for the rest of us... these athletes need to show the same character off the field that they claim to show on it. Suck it up.
by seedspeed on Dec 9, 2005 8:26 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Thank you!
by LongTimeFan on Dec 9, 2005 9:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My guess ...
And Cashman signs Nomah to play CF.
So, yes, the Yanks end up with all four of the premier early-aughts shortstops (and the worst of them all the one manning the position).
by monkeyball on Dec 9, 2005 11:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Miggy + $$ for Crosby &Zito
Orioles give us Tejada plus $3 million a year
for two years for Crosby and Zito.
Our lineup looks like this:
- Ellis
- Kotsay
- Tejada
- Chavez
- Frank Thomas
- DJ
- Payton
- Swisher
- Kendall
good power and decent team speed. (Except for DJ/Thomas)We lose Zito for this year but
can't probably keep him anyway long term.
Tough to let Crosby go but he's no Tejada.
Tejada should be very productive the
next 4 yrs., plus he brings leadership.
by Reggie on Dec 9, 2005 1:06 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Ok, that's just mean!
Frankly, I think Miggy is just being a baby. I mean, I loved the guy when we has here, but he is not anymore. He went to Baltimore, he is getting tons of money, and now he is complaining. I guess the grass is not greener on the other side!
But then there is this other voice in my head that is saying that all this got blown WAY out of control. He probably said one little comment to one little reported and the media is making it sound like he set up a press conference to declair his desire to be traded. And of course, being A's fans, everyone here jumped all over it.
This will be forgotten by this time next week.
P.S. Crosby no Tejada, you're right. Crosby will be better than Tejada, you just wait and see.
by BobbyCrosbysGirl on Dec 9, 2005 1:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bring the Miggy Magic Back
I mean, isn't he THE proven right handed power hitter who can lead a team down the stretch run we're looking for?
And with Eric's arm/shoulder thing and Bobby's injuries...a Johnson/Ellis/Tejada/Crosby or Chavez (DH) infield sounds really, really good to me
*Though I do think Thomas is going to have the monster year we all thought Dye would have*
Okay, I think I covered all my bases =)
by oaklandfan40 on Dec 9, 2005 2:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Wait
Screw the gold gloves, this guy shouldn't field. Right?
Right???
Well, actually, I think this might be logic, but it seems to me that you just don't bench your best fielder... THE best fielder in MLB at his respective position, one who is on track to break a fielding award
by Alon on Dec 10, 2005 9:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Crosby vs Tejada argument
What led to this incredible optimism for Bobby Crosby? His first year was pretty good for a SS, but wasn't a barn burner offensive year by any means. His second year was better although it was hampered by injuries, so it's tough to tell what he would've projected to. I think Crosby is a good player and MIGHT one day become an all-star, although I have my reservations, but Tejada is a proven super star. On thing that really worries me about Crosby is his durability. The injuries are starting to mount up and his stats sink to an extremely low level post all-star break. In 2004 his post break numbers were: .208 BA, .311OBP, .396 Slg. In 2005: .239 BA, .321 OBP, .388 Slg. The only month of his career that he's actually put up flashes of being a super star is in June, .337 BA (eerily enough) in both June of 2004 and June of 2005. Tejada is the epitome of durability, often coming on stronger during the second half of the year (despite last year in which he dropped off to .276 after the break). Remember when he carried us during that 20 game win streak. How quickly we forget.
I hope Crosby keeps improving, but there are some causes for worry.
by RunRickeyRun on Dec 9, 2005 3:50 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Comparison ...
Age Mig Cros
_23 _91 91
_24 112 109
_25 112
_26 122
Pretty darned even ... and really Cros should be given a small edge, since Miggie posted those numbers with an extra year in the majors.
The reason Cros has a higher upside is that he's already a better defender than Miggie is and is a much better defender than Miggie was at this age.
Also, Tejada, while a great player, is fairly overrated in the "proven star" department. He won a hr derby? So the F#$k what? While his 2002 was a great year, A-Rod was the most deserving MVP. 150 RBIs? Yep and then he followed it up with 98 last year.
Miggie was my favorite player when he was on the team. I love his firey, passionate personality. But if I had the choice of Miggie at half his contracted salary or Crosby at his full contracted salary. No question, Crosby's my man.
by devo on Dec 9, 2005 4:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you!
by BobbyCrosbysGirl on Dec 9, 2005 4:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually,
As far as the HR derby, I know it means nothing. Abreu hit as many homer sin two hours last year as he did the whole season. It does bring fan appeal and it hepls pack the seats.
by RunRickeyRun on Dec 9, 2005 4:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You're right about the age ...
Defense is still the big difference.
Personally, I agree with BB that winning, not players (with HR record chases and being Japanese being notable exceptions), puts butts in the seats. No question Miggie is acknowledged as a huge star - but his stats don't even come close to matching it.
Any teammate who doesn't tell the press that one of his teammates is about ten times better than he really is is not much of a teammate.
by devo on Dec 9, 2005 4:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
tejada
by ucla kid on Dec 9, 2005 8:10 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 




















