Ginter sent to Sacramento
The A's have sent Keith Ginter to Sacramento, which says to me, that they have no future plans for him. If they can trade him for a six pack and some beef jerky that'd be great, if not, maybe another team will draft him via Rule V (is that even possible?)
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=ap-athletics-ginter&prov=ap&type=lgns
0 recs |
28 comments
Comments
rule V is not possible
by ohad on Oct 20, 2005 4:15 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Ginter & Rule 5
In fairness to Ginter, he was buried after getting off to a poor start. No one can hit playing as infrequently as he did in the second half of the season.
by rsquared on Oct 20, 2005 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rule V
by ohad on Oct 20, 2005 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nope
by OaktownTribesman on Oct 20, 2005 6:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rule V
by ArakSOT on Oct 21, 2005 7:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rule 5
by rsquared on Oct 21, 2005 7:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rule 6
by monkeyball on Oct 21, 2005 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you mean ...
by monkeyball on Oct 21, 2005 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
<police sirens wailing>
by ohad on Oct 20, 2005 4:19 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Tried to edit
by Dr Pez on Oct 20, 2005 4:23 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
do you know how?
by ohad on Oct 20, 2005 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe Ginter needs a groove
I felt bad for him this year (yes, there I go FEELING about players again, almost as if they're people and not commodities... LOL). I didn't think it was right for someone who is only middle-aged (in baseball years) to have to waste so much time on the bench, instead of being given a chance to play (in AAA, not in Ellis' place) and try to work himself out of his funk.
by Poppy on Oct 20, 2005 4:46 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Here's a Groove
He didn't DESERVE to be on the 40-Man Roster, let alone the 25-Man Roster.
by Colorado Fan on Oct 20, 2005 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
what does it mean to be sent to
is there something in particular that he would be doing there at this time that he couldn't do in Phoenix -- or winter league?
I'm just curious as to his status, given that he is under contract at over $1 million next year. Any information would be appreciated.
by OaklandSi on Oct 20, 2005 5:17 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Ginter's Status
He is still owed his 2006 salary by whatever team "owns" his contract. The A's would have to pay Ginter if he is still with the organization, but technically, he wouldn't count as 40-man roster compensation.
by rsquared on Oct 20, 2005 5:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
roster moves
When a player is removed from the 40-man roster he has to clear waivers, but any team claiming him would have to assume the remainder of his contract. Assuming he clears waivers, Ginter will most likely be back in spring training as a non-roster invite, with the A's hoping that he hits well enough either in spring training or in Sacramento for another team to trade for him.
by andeux on Oct 20, 2005 5:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
good riddance
clemens .281 obp, 58 ab, 31 g
thomas .255 obp, 46 ab, 30 g
ginter .234 obp, 137 ab, 51 g
melhuse .284 obp, 97 ab, 39 g
by xbhaskarx on Oct 20, 2005 7:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
another reason
This same logic may be applied to any and all trade banter... but then we couldn't get J. Rollins (to play 2b) for Payton and Melhuse, huh? Damn, I was looking forward to that one. ; )
by StewFan on Oct 20, 2005 7:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ginter is so yesterday
By the way, I would not be shocked to have someone grab Ginter, even at $1.4 mil for the year.
by Hang Man on Oct 20, 2005 9:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would be
by StewFan on Oct 20, 2005 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That should read:
Gee, punctation IS useful!
by StewFan on Oct 20, 2005 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stavisky has less trade value than Ginter
by OaktownTribesman on Oct 21, 2005 7:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
never did like the ginter trade...
by bigelephant on Oct 21, 2005 10:40 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Can Ginter refuse the assignment
If so, what would happen to the last year of his A's contract? Would the A's still be on the hook for it, or would that void the contract?
Unless the A's can get something in a trade, that might be the cheapest resolution.
by OaklandSi on Oct 21, 2005 11:42 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















