Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Four TCU Football Players Among 17 Arrested In Drug Ring

Billy Beane Back in AN Part III

The second Billy Beane AN interview concludes with this final installment.  Part I is here.  Part II is here.

I hope you enjoy this conversation as much as I enjoyed participating in it.

I want to thank Billy Beane for graciously granting two hours of his time to discuss everything A's.  Athletics Nation is eternally grateful to get a peek into the mastermind behind our green and gold.

Thank you, Billy.

Blez:  What would you call your best move and conversely, what would you call your worst move?

BB:  My best move?  Hiring Paul DePodesta.  I mean that.  I lost J.P. (Ricciardi) in sort of the middle of this run and he was incredibly valuable.  The brainpower Paul brought was amazing. I'd like to think that I taught Paul a few things and he taught me a few things.  He's taken heat down there.  You know, we're allowed to be creative up here, apparently, he isn't allowed to be creative down there.  I would say from a personnel standpoint, there are two moves.  And the moves have a lot of legs to them.  Trading for Kenny Rogers, getting half his salary paid, having him for a year and a half, and then turning around and trading him for young players and using the money that he had to go out and get Kevin Appier and using that for Billy Taylor-Isringhausen.  That transaction had so many legs to it.  Then we ended up getting first round picks for Kevin Appier.  A lot flowered from that.  One, I knew it would raise some eyebrows.  We always liked Mark Kotsay.  I hated to trade Ramon (Hernandez) because he was one of those core group of young players and I knew I was giving up a good player.  But to see Mark Kotsay sort of justify our faith in him, going back to when he was at Cal State Fullerton.  There was a lot of satisfaction in knowing we'd given up a good player and people not really understanding it, but then understanding it once they got to see the player play.  Once again, it was a good player for a good player, but I think people got to see the value in it.  And having Miller for the year and having him do a good job, and then getting Kendall and getting two high draft picks for Miller as he leaves.  You can't judge everything we do looking through a cylinder.  I can tell you and this is an absolute fact.  We knew there was a possibility we would also be getting the benefit of having him and also getting two picks for him.  Not only did we give a player who we drafted in the 10th round in Jon Adkins, and without Ray we probably wouldn't have won the division and we ended up getting a first rounder and a comp for him.  These were all things we thought about when we made the trade.  People have a tendency of looking at Player X for Player Y and end it there.  But sometimes Player X will have other value.  I look at a situation like Bobby Crosby, who was the year that we had multiple compensation picks.  It was the year Appier left in 2000.  We took Crosby and Bonderman in the first round.  Crosby is rookie of the year and Jeremy is going to be a marvelous pitcher, but we get Ted Lilly who helps us win the division.

Blez:  That's why you can't go into the snap judgment as soon as a deal is made.

BB:  Right, and that's what is interesting about these trades.  And that's what I love, for lack of a better word, about the blogger's world.  There is a tendency to really analyze things in detail.  Ultimately, because there is so much conversation and investigation on a site like yours, people may not ultimately agree with it, but they stumble onto what you're trying to do.  Someone emailed me something written on a Cardinals' blog, and they had nailed all the things we were talking about.  The economic reasons, the personnel reasons and the reasons we made the exchange.  The world of a Web log will lend itself to a lot of investigation.  And you will often stumble across the answer more than someone who has to write in two hours to meet deadline just to make sure something is out in the paper the next day.

Blez:  There are people on the site who are fans who understandably react emotionally to those kinds of deals, but once you have time to step back and take a look at things in depth, it becomes clearer.  I'll tell you, when I heard about Mulder's trade, it was baffling for me.  But once I had a chance to sit down and look at the argument and what you got in return, it helped to see things from that perspective.

BB:  Yeah, I make sure I give all you guys about a day to go into time out. (Laughing)  Then I'll go on to check and see what you've got to say.

Blez:  You're overseeing romper room, huh?

BB:  (Laughing) Exactly.  But let's look at it from a different perspective.  OK, let's just look at next year's team and put Barton aside for a minute, who may end up being the best of all the guys we've traded for.  Let's take Dan Haren and Kiko Calero.  It's not just Haren and Colero because their combined salaries are $600 grand.   Give or take.  $600 grand for those two vital roles.  Right?  Let's say the player you traded is going to make 7 million bucks.  It's not just Haren and Calero, but it's Haren and Calero and whatever else you did with that 7 million bucks.  One of the reasons that this team was so successful during its run was that we had young players that were contributing at the major league level that were very cost-effective which allows you to add other things.  When you have a guy like Chavez and Tejada playing short and third making $300,000, it allows you to bring in a Kevin Appier.  It allows you to bring in a player of that status and of that salary to augment it.  When you have guys surrounding the diamond that are making 5, 6 or 7 million dollars in our market, that gets chewed up pretty quick.  The remainder of your roster gets filled in with guys who probably shouldn't be there.  The most valuable resource in this game is 0-3 (years of service) players who are good players on your major league team.  Those are the most valuable guys you can have because that allows you to do so much more because they fill out a critical role.

Blez:  Especially for the small market team, right?

BB:  Yeah and it's critical that we have those guys.  That's really the basis for all our success.  You know when Bobby Crosby comes in and hits 20 bombs as a rookie shortstop making $300,000, that's incredibly valuable.  What you don't want to do is have eight of those guys who are cutting their teeth all at the same time.  At that point, you truly do have a rebuilding situation.  Those are only kind of fun.

Blez:  I'm not sure if we ever got your, I'm not sure you want to call it this, but your worst move.

BB:  Some of those are yet to be determined.  (Laughs)

Blez:  Well, any that you look back on and kind of cringe?

BB:  You always do that.  I'm not hesitating because I'm having a hard time thinking of bad moves, but I want to think of one I look back on and kind of go, "Yow."  It was a ways back, but one I've referred to before, when we traded Steve Karsay for Mike Fetters early.  We all make mistakes.  It's an imperfect science.  The Karsay one wasn't a particularly good trade.  Probably the most talented player I've traded and will probably be the best player I've traded, will be Bonderman.  But I also knew when we did it that we needed someone to fill out our rotation and Lilly was going to do that at a rate we could afford.  Ted was very, very successful for us when he was here.  I still have faith that Bobby Kielty will be a good player.  People will point to that one.  But understand that Ted was going to get to a range we couldn't afford.  I still think it's a story unwritten despite Ted's year (in Toronto) because I think Bobby is going to be a good player.  Ted's season last year was certainly a more productive year from that standpoint.  But I rule out Bobby Kielty because I think Bobby Kielty is going to be a very valuable guy.  I think very, very highly of him and I know that might raise the ire of some people who might not be very satisfied with his performance last year.

Blez:  Being a former player and having a management perspective now, how do you feel about the steroids scandal?

BB:  I hate to think that it's having an effect on young people who see it as a vehicle on the road to success.  That to me, is the biggest issue and the biggest negative.  I'm not in high school, but it scares me to think that young people would see that as a way of being successful in this game.

Blez:  Have you heard anything about the Moneyball movie?  Are they consulting you at all?

BB:  Yes.  I know it's still something in the works.  I've officially yet to sign off on it.  Because anytime they make a movie, you have concerns that people who are very important to you aren't misrepresented.  I would say as much as anything, that's why I haven't given the full write-off on it, at least with any approval that I might have.

Blez:  Anybody you see playing you?  Maybe (George) Clooney?

BB:  (Laughing)  That would be flattering and that would probably be the greatest fictionalization I could imagine.

Blez:  Couple more questions.  You mentioned Bobby Crosby a couple of times.  How much do you expect him to mature this year?  What can we expect out of him?

BB:  Even if Bobby improves just a little, you've got a heck of a player on your hands.  I think the first two years of a major league player's career are going to be similar to what you saw Bobby's rookie year.  You're going to see some up and down and up and down.  And then what you're going to start to see in Bobby around the end of his second year is some real consistency.  And then you can say, "Hey, this guy's going to be a star."  The thing you've got to be careful with young players is the moment you think that they've finally got it, you have to know that they're going to go through more tough times.  I think what you're going to see in Bobby is a better player, but one who is still cutting his teeth and going through some of the growing pains a young player does.  But the one thing I think you're going to see this season is that he's really going to grasp what is going on and by the end of the year you're going to say, "Wow this guy is really going to be something special."  You're still going to see some ups and downs because he is still incredibly young.  We saw it with Miguel, we saw it with a guy like Chavez.  We even went through that with guys like Giambi.  But once they get it, they don't lose it.  At some point during the season, you're going to see that with Bobby.  Bobby is just scratching the surface.  There are a few players who've come through our system and they're just different.  When Chavez came in and was hitting batting practice balls down and away for line drives over the left field wall, the other players would go, wow, this guy is special.  Bobby will do things like that and we've all seen him hit balls as far as any power hitter we've ever had here.  Guys will go, this guy is going to be special.  Bobby is one of those guys who almost cares too much.  He's so critical of himself.  Being a perfectionist is one of the things that can be tough on a young player.  Bobby is that.  Bobby doesn't ever want to make a mistake.  He takes every mistake personally.  He takes every at bat personally.  When he learns not to do that, he's going to be even better.  It's a sign of his character because he cares that much, but it can also slow him down because he cares so much.  Bobby is one of those guys who, as a rookie, if he had a tough game I won't go near him.  

Blez:  He sounds sort of like a Junior Billy Beane.

BB:  He does, but he's far better.  This kid is really special and very talented.  He refuses to accept any failure at this point.  That's one of the reasons you see the ups and downs, but because of that, that's why he is going to wind up being very special.

Blez:  What are your remaining priorities this offseason?

BB:  We've got a few arbitration cases to go.  With the winter that we've had, we're focusing on getting one-year deals done.  It's not that we aren't going to consider multi-year deals with these guys.  Whether it's Ruby or Dotel, we certainly might consider something down the road.  

Blez:  Does Dan Johnson and Huston Street's presence in the system affect your thinking towards those players in particular?

BB:  Not so much this year.  There's room for all, ultimately.  Particularly in Huston's case.  The thing we won't do with Huston Street is anoint him a future closer.  I'm going to always hedge my bet and say, he's going to be a darn good major league bullpen guy.  I think that closing in the major leagues is something you have to be careful in saying someone in the minor leagues is going to be that guy.  That being said, I will say, he's going to be an outstanding major league reliever.  And where he pitches, the sky is probably the limit.  There's been too many guys who have come through the minor leagues who've been set up for a fall.  I think who anyone who has seen Huston believes that he is closer to being in the major leagues than he is from being away from it, that's for sure.  

Blez:  Are you pretty much done with trades?

BB:  I was predominantly.  There's no sense of urgency.  

Blez:  There are still lots of rumors of you trading Byrnes.

BB:  I've seen that.  I would say the bulk of our offseason is over, but we're more likely to go into camp with this team than we are to make too many changes to it.

Blez:  I've read in several places that Nick Swisher played the majority of the year last year injured with a thumb problem.  How eager are you to see this kid and what he's going to be able to do in the majors when he's healthy?

BB:  Nick's one of those kids that even when you aren't eager to see him, he's eager to make sure he's seen.  He's really something special as far as his makeup and his personality.  It's been well-documented what I thought of Nick from day one.  I'm probably guilty of being tougher on Nick than anybody.  In fact, I remember he hit a home run against Cleveland and I happened to be in San Diego that weekend visiting my daughter.  It wasn't televised and I saw him doing this ridiculous dance in the dugout.  When I got back into town, I immediately yanked him aside and told him that as a rookie, he didn't need to be on ESPN after hitting a home run.  I think that shocked him a bit.

Blez: I know I said this earlier, but I appreciate you taking out so much time to talk to me because you've become a personal hero of mine and one of the reasons I love following this team.  It's a true honor that you would take out so much time to take to talk with the AN community.

BB:  I appreciate it.  I love the site and I love the support you give us.  I know immediately it can be a vehicle for some frustrations but I know they care like I do.

Blez:  Occasionally, you do get the people who spout off without truly thinking or stepping back.

BB:  It's kind of like Halloween.  95 percent of the kids couldn't be happier that you're there to answer the door to give them a piece of candy, but there's always five percent who can't wait to egg your house.  Just because the five percent want to egg your house doesn't mean you stop answering the door.

Blez:  Well, I hope you understand that there are people who don't always understand what you're trying to do, and they occasionally write about it.

BB:  You'll hear people say, I only care what people write when they're people that I care about.  My conviction isn't like stalks of wheat in a field.  The day I run the franchise like that is the day that I'm not fit to be a leader.

Blez:  I'm glad you feel that way.

BB:  For any franchise, there is a strong segment of the fanbase that does care because they're emotionally involved in the team.  Sometimes their first reaction isn't always their real reaction.  You aren't going to always make everyone happy.  Listen, we've averaged 95 wins over the past six years and there are some people who think we should've averaged 98.

Blez:  For me, my philosophy is to look and see what direction the franchise is going in before I make a snap judgment.  You have to assess how the on-the-field product performs.  You can't always make the judgment based solely on names on a paper like so many people were willing to do.

BB:  To me, it's going to be a fun year because there are some unknowns.  I still think if people are real fans of this team, the worst thing to happen is for them to have no hope.  Even if they question some of the things that have gone on, what can be said is that the players that we got in these trades are young and talented; what we don't know is how their initial performance is going to be.  But the belief is that hey, they're pretty good and they should get better.  There is hope.  The worst thing is to have an apathetic feeling surrounding your favorite team.  When you say, when are they ever going to get it right?

Blez:  I certainly don't feel that way.  That may have been a part of the initial emotional reaction of the trades, but once you take a step back and take a look you realize that the team has gotten better in two areas and for the future.

BB:  Does that mean that we aren't going to have our ups and downs?  No, we are absolutely going to.  We're going to be a little more volatile in certain areas.  There will be things that just don't work out as planned.  One thing I've always prided myself on, and I had this conversation with Tim Hudson-- when we were in Chicago, if you recall, we lost two out of three this year.  We lost a couple of games in St. Louis and it was starting to come to a head.  I called Tim Hudson when we were in Chicago and it was beginning to fracture the clubhouse, if you recall.  I called Tim and not too many people know this, and I said, "Tim, we'll fix it before the end of the week.  We'll get this thing taken care of, we're going to get it fixed."  I remember thinking to myself when we hung up, because I remember telling Tim we were going to fix it, I wasn't quite sure the answer myself.  But he needed to know that we were doing something.  I think it was by the end of that week when we got Dotel.  I'm both patient and impatient.  I'm patient when I know something is going to work out.  But if I can see things that are evident and obvious to me, we're going to fix them.  As an example, Ted Lilly.  We knew Ted Lilly was going to be a good pitcher and remember when he came over he was still strengthening his shoulder and people were wondering what the heck was going on.  We knew, myself, Paul and David, knew he was going to be good, so we were able to be patient.  But I'm not going to be patient if it's not going to work doing it over and over and over again.  If we're going to commit to something long term, we will, but there are things we'll be less patient with, just like fans.  The one thing we've always done is make adjustments when we felt like adjustments were needed or could be made.  In a perfect world, you go into spring training, you're in first place from day one until the end of the year, but it doesn't always happen that way.  But come April 1st and the season opens, we're constantly trying to find ways to improve the team because just like anyone else, we're not ever satisfied either.  I am very excited about our future.  I'm excited about how some guy is going to perform, but we feel good about how they are ultimately going to be as performers.  I feel good about Kendall catching, as most fans do.  I feel good about Chavy playing third.  Feel good is probably the wrong word.  I feel great.  I feel great about Crosby.  I felt great about Ellis coming back and Ginter being there.  I feel great about Durazo being back.  There's a lot of things to feel great about.  In my response to the young pitchers, I'm excited we have them.  I feel lucky that we have them and they're going to be here.  They've been so good up until this point.  I'm excited to see them going through the growth process that Crosby had to take at short.  But I'm also excited that not only can we protect them with a much-improved bullpen, but think about the fact that under this current circumstance, two of our best prospects--Garcia and Huston Street--might not even be able to crack this bullpen.  Not only is the bullpen improved, but it can get better.

Blez:  Suddenly you have depth.

BB:  Exactly, and that's one of the things we lost over the last few years.

Blez:  And I kind of sensed that from you when we spoke back in August.  That you were sort of realizing that.

BB:  I did.  I could see that we were getting to a point where if we just kept going la-de-dah, that we were just going to progressively start to erode as opposed to progressively getting better.

Blez:  Was it partially looking at the bell curve of wins, how it went up and up and then started going down?

BB:  Not so much the wins.  The wins were a symptom of that.  I talk about our depth.  Kenny (Macha) will be challenged each day to put together a lineup that isn't going to hurt someone else's feelings that day.  Last year, we really ran these guys ragged.  I was actually disappointed we didn't win the division because it was there for us to win, but I was also incredibly proud of the way the guys performed under the circumstances.  I mean, we lost Hudson for six weeks, Mark struggled the second half, Hatteberg's tongue was hanging out at the end of the year.  

Blez:  Miller's was too, yeah.

BB:  Chavy was also gone for six weeks.  You think of what we went through and the fact that we lost in the second to last day of the year to a team that loaded itself up in the offseason with players and it's hard to not be proud of the aggregate performance of the team despite the disappointing finish.  Just going in there and losing a couple of players and keeping things the same would've been a very comfortable way for us to do business.  But if we were to put together a team that won 84-85 games, I think people would've been more disappointed in that.  I think it's better to not let this thing run out and then announcing to the public that we're rebuilding for four or five more years.  When you're GM comes up and says, "I've got a five-year plan," that's him saying, "We're going to get our butts kicked for four and hopefully we finish .500 in the last year and I can get an extension."  When you say you have a five-year plan, youre saying we're going to get our butts kicked for four years, so it isn't my fault.  That's a comfortable way to do business.

Blez:  Thanks for taking that preemptive strike.

BB:  Well, it's still a story untold.  Is it going to be perfect?  Of course it isn't going to be perfect.  But there is a plan.  People who follow sports franchises that are most disappointed with their favorites team are the ones who hear their people and ask, "What are they doing?  What's their plan?  Do they have any idea what they're doing?" We'd like to think that despite it not being popular, there is a short-and a long-term plan with this franchise going forward.  Believe me, when that trade is made, everyone gets irritated.  I'm the one who has to sleep, it's my job.  As much as they care, I care more.  Actually, let me go back, you asked me my worst move of all time.  I was the assistant GM, me and J.P. decided Ariel Prieto over Todd Helton.  That was it.

Blez:  So, you're revising that decision?

BB:  Well, Helton was our guy, we all loved him.  But then it became kind of cool to get a Cuban pitcher who might go to the major leagues.  So we made an 11th hour decision.  Quite frankly, the decision to do that was a lesson learned when it came to Zito.  There was a number of players who fell to us and when Zito was available, we said no way and took Zito because he was our guy.  It was a lesson learned that we haven't forgotten.  It was by far the worst.  I was the assistant GM, but I definitely had a hand in the poor decision.  Not that Todd Helton's any good.  (Laughs)

Blez:  Well, again, Billy, thanks so much, I know you probably still have a ton of stuff going on.

BB:  Not a problem, Tyler.  I'll look forward to seeing it on the site.  The approach that you've taken is to highlight the good things about the franchise.  Not to create noise.  Understand that papers are emphasizing the negative things that are happening.  You have a vehicle that's trying to understand what we're doing.  The premise of the site is that you want us to do well.

Blez:  I'm a fan first and foremost.  Thanks again, Billy.

Anyone else eager for April to roll around?

Comment 72 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

April...
can't come soon enough.

Thanks so much, Blez.

Chicks dig Moneyball.

by Kelly on Jan 25, 2005 8:47 PM PST reply actions  

April???
I can't wait until spring training!!

by EddieVegas_NRAF on Jan 26, 2005 2:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Blez
Thank you so much for all of the time and work you spend on this site. AN is truely wonderful, again thank you so much. I cant wait 4 spring training.
all fans interupting with play in any matter will be ejected and subject to arrest.

by bballfanr33 on Jan 25, 2005 8:51 PM PST reply actions  

Wow, that was great!
Awesome stuff!  After parts I and II, I didn't think there's be anything left to interest me, but instead, I'm blown away!

One thing perks my interest, though:

But I rule out Bobby Kielty because I think Bobby Kielty is going to be a very valuable guy.  I think very, very highly of him and I know that might raise the ire of some people who might not be very satisfied with his performance last year.

What does Billy know that we don't?  From looking
at Kielty's numbers they seem to have been declining pretty steadily over the last few
years (his OPS has fallen from .890 to .691 since 2002 and his OBP has fallen 80 points in that same period).  BB says he "has faith" Kielty will be better this year, but what's going to change for him to make that happen?  Better coaching?

That sounds more negative than I meant it to be.  I like Kielty a lot -- and have ever since he started playing for the Twins -- and I hope he's an every game starting outfielder(well, a productive outfielder, anyway) -- but I need something to hang that hope on.

Forty isn't old -- for a tree.

by atomopawn on Jan 25, 2005 9:04 PM PST reply actions  

sample size
i was thinking the same thing; i wonder if BB discounts statistics from a season where kielty was the 4th/5th outfielder.

by sec119 on Jan 25, 2005 10:33 PM PST up reply actions  

How's it feel
to have the best and brightest GM in baseball.
It is truly an enjoyable experience to be an A's fan.  I am amazed sometimes what I read in AN by some guys who write that BB is a liar, doesn't care, blowing smoke. It is such a difficult thing to judge a player, just think, 25 bloopers a year is the difference between a great star or a bum.  That is 5 bleeders or checked swings a month.  BB has done an amazing job, and in retrospect we can all complain about some deal or the other, but at the time he made it I also agreed with him, so who am I to complain?  I thought Rhoades would be great, agreed with the Dye and T.Long signings at the time.  I had no idea Kotsay was as good as he was, was mystified when he took a 2nd string catcher and made him a first baseman.  I don't doubt anything BB does anymore, I will take my chances on him any day.

by china bob on Jan 25, 2005 9:12 PM PST reply actions  

Thanks again...
...to Billy and Blez.

Ariel Prieto, that's a name I haven't heard in awhile.

"I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!" -Brick Tamland, Anchorman

by secret ASian man on Jan 25, 2005 9:17 PM PST reply actions  

Yes, can hardly wait for
April to roll around, and Ariel, believe it or not, was burning up the Mexican Winter League last time I looked.

by robertmelvin on Jan 25, 2005 10:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah...
I think I've vaguely heard of him posting a sub-3 ERA in the Mexican League, and it's a hitter's league.
"I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!" -Brick Tamland, Anchorman

by secret ASian man on Jan 26, 2005 12:02 AM PST up reply actions  

I'll be damned
Good for you, Ariel.  Good luck!

by paradox on Jan 26, 2005 1:07 PM PST up reply actions  

I wonder if he's playing for...
the Tomato Growers.  Rodrigo Lopez put them on the map, and it's hard to forget that nickname
"When I went to church that same Sunday, I picked up a 2x4. I went up to the pulpit and clubbed the preacher in the head..."--Wesley Willis

by Cutthemullet on Jan 27, 2005 12:48 AM PST up reply actions  

Thank you Mr. Beane
I can't wait to see the season begin.  I'll be there in Oakland as often as I can.
"The sun don't shine on the same dog's ass all the time." -Catfish Hunter

by kaweahkaweah on Jan 25, 2005 9:24 PM PST reply actions  

Prieto
I remember coming home from school the day of the draft in 1995 and being so excited to see that the A's had drafted Todd Helton, who I'd been following the entire college season through Baseball America...and then I remember being crushed when I saw Ariel Prieto's name come across the bottom line on ESPN.  I'm so glad Billy has made up for that day tenfold.

Thanks Blez and Billy.

by MooseKnuckle415 on Jan 25, 2005 9:52 PM PST reply actions  

Thanks blez and beane
billy, i trust you to deliver us a championship in the future!  in billy we trust!

and blez, you are a pimp. haha.  thanks for the great material, and one more time, congrats on your baby girl!

by jnutts on Jan 25, 2005 9:57 PM PST reply actions  

Helton
I was flipping through my copy of the 2002 BA Prospects Handbook a while back and in it they reviewed the 1st round picks of the 1990's.

The 1995 draft kinda jumped out as a bad day for Oakland. At least Beane learned from his mistake.

by grover on Jan 25, 2005 9:59 PM PST reply actions  

Great Insights
loved the discussion about trades having many legs (so true), the conversation with Hudson in Chicago, and the bit about Swisher's dance.

by silas on Jan 25, 2005 10:01 PM PST reply actions  

Awesome
Thanks a ton Blez and Billy. We all appreciate the time and effort.

Now to get back to counting the minutes until spring training...

by TempletonPeck on Jan 25, 2005 10:11 PM PST reply actions  

Projecting relievers
GJAB (Great Job Again, Blez).

When Beane hesitated (very reasonably, I think) to declare Street the Closer of the Future, did anyone else flash back to Steve Chitren?

by Nick on Jan 25, 2005 10:21 PM PST reply actions  

Great Reference!
What ever happened to Steve Chitren?

He was gonna be great ...

by Eck on Jan 26, 2005 7:28 AM PST up reply actions  

The best part
I thought for sure that part 3 would be a bunch of leftovers and sentimental thank yous.  But this was the best part of all.  I loved his analysis of his trades.
  The thing with this interview is that BB is so frank and open.  He speaks naturally.  You know he's not just blowing smoke to appease everyone.  His print interviews in the past (especially his analysis of the teams in this year's playoffs, anyone remember that one?) were so ... ho-hum.  He was so politic.  But then again, anyone in his position is usually that way in the public.  That's why I love Blez and AN so much.  I feel like we get to know the real BB.  Or at least as real as we'll ever get to see him be.
  Thank you Billy Beane and Blez.  And congratulations again on your beautiful baby girl.
"We tend to scoff at the beliefs of the ancients. But we can't scoff at them personally, to their faces, and this is what annoys me." Jack Handey

by davebenfremont on Jan 25, 2005 10:38 PM PST reply actions  

agreed
I thought for sure that part 3 would be a bunch of leftovers and sentimental thank yous.  But this was the best part of all.

yeah I was thinking the same thing...i couldn't believe that much quality content was left.  And this was the best content.

"When I went to church that same Sunday, I picked up a 2x4. I went up to the pulpit and clubbed the preacher in the head..."--Wesley Willis

by Cutthemullet on Jan 27, 2005 12:53 AM PST up reply actions  

My thanks to Billy and Blez also
....it was like I was party to the conversation.

We all know that Billy is the best GM (and more than 95% believe it on AN !!!), but as much or more thanks go to Blez, who is able to have the trust of Billy, so that he speaks so openly.

I phoned the A's Season Ticket Holder telehone number today and found out I got Seat 6, Row 1, Section 126, right at the A's Bull Pen pitching mound, for 18 of my 20 games.  I am ready, and now Billy's excitement has got me so so excited too.

by robertmelvin on Jan 25, 2005 10:49 PM PST reply actions  

Fascinating
I consider myself to be smart and interesting, but BB makes me feel like a peon.
That dude is amazing. Well, every time I question his moves I end up eating my words, so I'll just hop on the wagon and look forward to this year.

I still don't like his faith in Macha, though....

 I think intelligent people are fascinating to listen to, and I think we have two of them going in that interview. Thanks, Blez, and thanks Billy....now figure out how to get a RH power bat please.

by Tony on Jan 25, 2005 11:26 PM PST reply actions  

part tres
My favorite part:  

Blez:  "I'm not sure if we ever got your, I'm not sure you want to call it this, but your worst move."

Hilarious.  I'm so glad you asked, Blez.  Also props to Billy for an excellent answer, mentioning Karsay, then Helton later in the interview, but also very cool that he addressed the Kielty-for-Lilly swap.  It had to be addressed in any discussion of "worst trades", and it was also the right thing to do to stand by his player, and to maintain that it wasn't such a bad trade.  Very impressive.

My least favorite part:

Blez:  "Well, I hope you understand that there are people who don't always understand what you're trying to do, and they occasionally write about it."

Is it SO WRONG to ever criticize A's players, management, whomever??  Is every such criticism so misguided?

One time as a kid, I heard from another room my aunt screaming angrily into the phone at her own grown daughter.  I asked my mom, "How could she yell at her daughter like that?  Doesn't she love her?"  My mom shrugged and explained to me, "Sometimes people yell at each other because they love each other so much."

Don't worry about Billy; he can take a little tough love.  

Thank you, Blez ...

by rubin sierra on Jan 25, 2005 11:58 PM PST reply actions  

Random thoughts
-- Nothing about the outfield, other than what appeared to be an obvious dodge in Part II (Blez asks about the outfield; Beane answers about the infield).  Maybe he got sidetracked mid-conversation and forgot the question.  But I still have a feeling Byrnes is going to be dealt.

-- No surprise, Beane has faith in Kielty.  The thing is, I have faith in Kielty when he's batting right-handed.  But if he insists on switch-hitting, he's nothing more than a platoon guy/pinch hitter.

-- And as much as defends it, I still don't understand the Lilly/Kielty trade.  We took the money we would have spent on Lilly and gave it to Redman.  He can't really admit blowing that one, because Kielty is still on the team - and we can still hope he pans out.

-- Mark Ellis is very much part of the plan.

-- It is a good thing not to have to force Huston Street into a key bullpen role before he's ready.  If he starts the season in AAA, that's okay too.  I would rather he earn his spot.

-- Multi-year deals for Dotel and Durazo?  Unless Wolff is opening his wallet wide, I don't think so.  They've got cheap replacements, most likely, which Beane accurately pegs as extremely valuable.

by bear88 on Jan 26, 2005 1:05 AM PST reply actions  

lilly kielty trade
i'm sure beane would have loved to keep lilly, he's a good pitcher and probably the reason the a's won the division in 03.  but you have to consider all of the questions with the outfield going into the 04 season: dye had injury issues and had hit .172 the previous year, byrnes could go into a 2 for 100 slump at any point, and kotsay had injury issues as well.  

by xbhaskarx on Jan 26, 2005 2:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Damn it! There's no part 4? Or part 5?
Great stuff, Blez. You might want to edit that first answer from Billy, though. It looks to me like it might have got garbled a bit. He's talking about Miller and the draft choices we get for him and then suddenly (without changing the subject) his comments are clearly referring to Durham and those draft choices. It looks like there's a sentence or two missing. Of course, maybe he actually said it that way, with his thoughts moving too fast for his words to catch up.

Bear88: I agree about Lilly/Kielty, I still don't buy the economic argument with respect to Lilly since Billy then went and spent that same money (and quite a lot more) on Redman. (Some argue that Lilly savings were to be poured into a Foulke deal, and when that didn't happen it was Foulke money that went to Redman, but I don't buy that either, for reasons that get too complicated to go into here.)

by Faust on Jan 26, 2005 5:34 AM PST reply actions  

Beane is the man
So glad . . . so glad . . . he is in charge.  

Thanks Blez (again)!

by Dwayne Murphy on Jan 26, 2005 7:27 AM PST reply actions  

well...
Sony Pictures bought the rights to Moneyball, and Stan Chervin is currently writing the script. The news came out last May, I think.

by Sharon on Jan 26, 2005 8:50 AM PST up reply actions  

beane...
...is at the poker table and he not only knows what everyone else has, he knows what the next card will be.

thanks blez.

My wife says i'm "obsessed" with AN and colleagues worry i'm "fixated". I say "ya, OK.....so?" Wish me luck, therapy starts Monday.

by bigelephant on Jan 26, 2005 7:42 AM PST reply actions  

Good Bye's
It was great how Blez kept trying to say 'Thanks, BB - Goodbye', but Billy didn't want Blez to leave.  If you keep it up, Billy might start considering you a good luck charm, awarding AN with quarterly interviews (please).

Well done, Blez.

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Jan 26, 2005 8:07 AM PST reply actions  

Thanks again, Blez...
Pleasure to read as always.

I especially liked the Todd Helton admission -- it would've been amazing to see him mashing in an A's uniform, but it's hard to lament it since he'd already be making 9 figures in free agent money elsewhere.

by Vic @ Athletics Nation on Jan 26, 2005 8:36 AM PST reply actions  

Helton
Sure, he'd be gone by now, but can you imagine Helton as part of the same talented crop of players that joined the team in the late 90s.  Lordy...

But Beane obviously learned a lesson from that experience, and put it to good use.

by bear88 on Jan 26, 2005 9:01 AM PST up reply actions  

Wow
As great as the first 2 parts of the interview were, I thought this part was even better.  Thank you Blez and BB!

I thought it was interesting that BB grouped Ginter in with Ellis, Crosby, Chavez, etc when he was talking about players that he was feeling great about.  It would certainly be nice if Ginter is  grouped with that crowd when it comes to production this season.

Jonathon

"...every year there are hundreds of great books published that I won't have time to read. And once I'm dead, the situation gets even worse" - Rob Neyer

by JLeverenz on Jan 26, 2005 8:41 AM PST reply actions  

Thanks Blez...
Great Read and Great Work! (Didn't know about the Moneyball movie)

by D Fords Cousin on Jan 26, 2005 8:51 AM PST reply actions  

Bonderman
So is the Bonderman curse gone since Billy said some nice things about him?

I hope so.

Great interview, Blez. Thanks to both you and Billy.

by Sharon on Jan 26, 2005 8:53 AM PST reply actions  

Marketing Tool
What a superlative group of interviews, blez. Thank you.

If the marketing division was wise, it would purchase blez's inteviews with BB and pay to publish them in the Chron. This would serve as a counterweight to the idiotic commentaries by the likes of Ray Fatso, Gwen Take-A-Knapp and Bruce Jerkoff. These fools are constantly negative on the team and ownership and their columns might lead some fans to abandon their support of the A's. (They are like reading the moronic whining of OFAC contributors in print.)

A reading of BB's interviews on AN would provide a comprehension lacking in most fans thanks to the fools who write for the Chron. It would help fans appreciate the intelligence behind a GM's moves which have given A's fans the second best winning record in the AL over the past few decades.

If one relied on Ray Fatso's scribblings, you'd wonder just how the A's are a regular contender for the postseason. Blez's interviews with BB provide just such insight.

The sole columnist who regularly wrote about the A's and BB's moves with any intelligence was Glenn Dickey and the idiot who is now the paper's sports editor forced the dean of local columnists out of his column. It's a tremendous loss to those of us who appreciate articulate, well thought through analysis. Dickey could also be critical when necessary...He recognized what a total incompetent Art Howe was. On the other hand, Dickey discussed the economic constraints on Schott and Hoffman and the corresponding brilliant moves by BB to stay within a small market budget yet produce remarkably competitive teams. He was an insider who knew what he was taking about. In comparison, Ray Fatso is little but a scribe reduced to expelling bile for the readers' comsumption...

by reztips on Jan 26, 2005 9:20 AM PST reply actions  

As long as we're ...
... eschewing constructive criticism in favor of name-calling, I think a more accurate of description of Glenn Dickey is a senile, rambling fool with nothing much to say.

by rubin sierra on Jan 26, 2005 12:23 PM PST up reply actions  

open season
Plus that same idiot sports editor got rid of Open Season by Tom FitzGerald which I also loved.

by batgirl on Jan 26, 2005 1:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I second that...
That was some funny stuff.
"I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!" -Brick Tamland, Anchorman

by secret ASian man on Jan 26, 2005 2:46 PM PST up reply actions  

complaint letter
I sent a complaint email to the editor and cc'd it to Tom FitzGerald.  As expected, I got a very nice reply from FitzGerald and never heard from the editor.  

by batgirl on Jan 27, 2005 9:16 AM PST up reply actions  

Pearls before swine
Your idea that publishing Blez's interviews in the Chron would help Chron readers to better understand the team is backward.  You're presupposing that intelligent commentary creates an intelligent readership, but in fact it's the other way around.  Billy Beane gives this sort of interview to AN because he knows he's talking to an audience that already understands and supports the team.  The people who read Ray Ratto aren't interested in understanding the under-the-hood workings of the team like we do.  They would have no idea what Billy is talking about.

Besides, doesn't the Chronicle have Susan Slusser?  She's pretty good.

by iglew on Jan 26, 2005 5:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks Blez
This is about the 50th time I've thanked Blez and Billy, so what is the harm in one more "thanks"?

This is really great insight into the "plan" for this year and a glimps at 2006 and beyond.

I can't wait for Spring Traning!  I'm fired up now.

Let's Go OAKLAND, Let's GO!!

Now THIS is Billy Ball

by Masaryk on Jan 26, 2005 10:02 AM PST reply actions  

Understating risk
Thanks again, Blez, and thanks to Billy Beane for being more accessible than anyone else in the business.

I thought this was the most interesting passage in the interview:

Let's take Dan Haren and Kiko Calero.  It's not just Haren and Colero because their combined salaries are $600 grand. Give or take.  $600 grand for those two vital roles.  Right?  Let's say the player you traded is going to make 7 million bucks.  It's not just Haren and Calero, but it's Haren and Calero and whatever else you did with that 7 million bucks.

This is the essence of the A's under Schott's ownership.  The whole show rests on Billy Beane's abilities as the world's greatest rotisserie baseball player.  So great that unlike those of us who play rotisserie baseball with our friends, BB successfully plays with a huge handicap -- he has a relatively low salary cap, while his primary competitors in the AL, the Yankees, Red Sox, and LAAOA, have either an enormous cap or none at all.

But every trade is a risk.  Sure, there are enormous benefits, as BB mentions, to freeing up the salary of someone like Mark Mulder.  There are also enormous risks -- that you won't get as much from the handful of unproven players as you would have gotten from a top-tier performer like Mulder.  Trading a Mulder does free up money but it also creates an huge hole in production that can't be filled with quantity alone.  Much of that quantity has to perform at a high level, or the deal becomes a giveaway.

That's why I thought it was interesting that BB identified a draft pick, rather than a trade, as his worst move.  Perhaps he did that so that he didn't have to point the finger and identify someone still on the roster, or someone who just recently left, as a bust.

In any event, it leaves out a point that needs emphasizing -- no matter how masterful a trade looks on the day it is announced, when you're trading a great player, it only works if you get a ton of production out of the new players that fill the void.  Because, as I think we'll see this year, the departures of Huddy and Mulder are a very big void.

MJB

by MJB on Jan 26, 2005 10:51 AM PST reply actions  

That was one of the best sports interviews
I've ever seen.  Amazing stuff.  Thanks Blez!

O

Really, deep down in your heart, don't you think it's time to get rid of Stomper?

by 66th Hegenberger on Jan 26, 2005 11:04 AM PST reply actions  

Billy Beane's Genius Exposed Once Again
   Thanks for the interiew as it has once again provided insight unaccessible under almost any other format that I have ever seen.
   We could pick apart what BB has said and realize that ultimately his model for success is one that never allows himself to stay in the status quo. What he has done is akin to what Bill Walsh did with the 49ers after their 1st 2 SuperBowl victories. The fan base we see today supporting that franchise is the result. The Raiders had that too, before they moved. After Barry retires, what will the Giants do? They will really be up a river w/o a paddle b/c we won't see another Barry for a long time. Their only chance to succeed is through their farm system and it's pitiful. We should thank BB 5 years from now for having the foresight to not allow history to repeat itself the way it did with the 92 A's.
   At that time, I would hope the A's are in a new (local) stadium providing revenue and flexibility to keep the team a perennial WS contender. The team will draw 2.5M per year and up...what a beautiful world that will be!

by Gerard on Jan 26, 2005 11:55 AM PST reply actions  

Kool-Aid drinker
O.K. I've drunk the kool-aid when it comes to the trades but now I'm disappointed that the A's are talking extension with Macha. I can't for the life of me understand the love affair with this guy.

by linden on Jan 26, 2005 1:14 PM PST reply actions  

Macha...
What's his VORP?
Forty isn't old -- for a tree.

by atomopawn on Jan 26, 2005 3:12 PM PST up reply actions  

VORP?
Wouldn't that be VORM?

Value Over Replacement Manager?

"I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!" -Brick Tamland, Anchorman

by secret ASian man on Jan 26, 2005 3:16 PM PST up reply actions  

VORM
Quite right, quite right.



Still, if BB likes him, he must be a bargain.
Forty isn't old -- for a tree.

by atomopawn on Jan 26, 2005 5:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Ken Macha execute?
Thanks Blez for your great work and devotion to the A's and to us, the fans.  Like most of us here I love the A's primarily because there always IS a plan...and as long as Billy Beane stays there will always be a plan.
  I now fully understand the moves that we've made.  Billy has essentially taken the game plan from the previous few years (where starting pitching drove everything) and flipped it upside down.  He will be "protecting" his young pitchers by looking at the game from the 9th inning back--from Dotel to Cruz and Calero to Rincon and Bradford (if he stays) to Yabu and the Duke and then to his starters.  Fortunately he will have to use this strategy only 3 out of every 5 starts.  
  My most serious concern is "can Ken Macha execute this strategy?".  Macha's handling of our pen (the Speier blame aside) last year was shaky at best.  Rincon faced righties, Bradford faced lefties.  Macha kept calling Justin Lehr out of the pen when he had little or nothing.  He kept going to the Duke down the stretch when it was painfully obvious the Duke left his best stuff in the first half of the year.
  Now we want Macha to make substantially MORE bullpen decisions?  
  This all could work...but Ken could pull it all down, singlehandedly.

by Steve in Napa on Jan 26, 2005 4:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm already sorry it's over
The only thing to complain about with these great interviews is that they must come to an end!  I loved reading them and am glad once again that we have BB on board.  I'm sure he was fascinating to sit down with.  I always laugh because BB is such a charismatic and interesting interview on KNBR, etc. and the "Brian Sabean" show is such a snore.  Brains and personality--a lucky combo for us A's fans.

by batgirl on Jan 26, 2005 1:16 PM PST reply actions  

Great Interview
I'm new to this site and still in disbelief that it exists. Thank you for putting in so much work and getting this information out there for us.

by gdubb925 on Jan 26, 2005 5:18 PM PST reply actions  

Fitzgerald Missed; Macha & Bullpen
Right you are, batgirl and SecretAsianMan: along with Dickey, Tom FitzGerald's Top of the 6th was a great column and is sorely missed.

I take it, Rueben Sierra, that you prefer Ray Fatso to Dickey. Now I know why TLR called your namesake what he did! Just jok'in...

Steve in Napa: How would you have handled the substandard pen any differently than Macha? Bradford can't get out lefties, Rincon was susceptible to righties. Therefore it made sense that they generally pitched to only one batter. In the first half of the season, with Hammond hurt, other than the inept Rhodes as closer, Macha was stuck with Lehr and Duke to get out more than one batter. And only the Duke was anywhere remotely effective until Mecir found his stride after the All Star break.

Now while Macha is quite decent but not nowhere near the great managers of today like TLR and Bobby Cox, but not even those future HOF'ers could do anything else with those liabilities in the pen. In this matter, Macha can be held blameless...

by reztips on Jan 26, 2005 5:36 PM PST reply actions  

Frank and Open
Like everyone here, I think it's awesome that Blez can get Billy Beane to talk openly as if he were talking with an intelligent colleague who understands what it means to be GM for a team like the A's, instead of talking down to us and just repeating the press release soundbites like you'd get from a more conventional forum.

That said, being "frank and open" this way doesn't mean he's telling us everything.  It was pretty obvious that he was dodging the question about Eric Byrnes:

"I would say the bulk of our offseason is over, but we're more likely to go into camp with this team than we are to make too many changes to it."

Oh, so it's less "likely" that he's going to make "too many changes"?  What the hell does that mean?  Does trading Eric Byrnes count as "too many changes"?

On the other hand, it's totally cool that he dodged the question because here at AN we all understand why.  Even if he is trying to trade Byrnes, until it's a done deal he can't come out and say so.  Otherwise it weakens his bargaining position and messes with Byrnes's head.

by iglew on Jan 26, 2005 6:06 PM PST reply actions  

Just so everyone knows...
I really try and avoid questions that he won't answer, and I know he won't answer in advance.

For example, I don't ask, what other teams did you have discussions with about Hudson and Mulder?  Because he won't answer that.

Or, did you ever have a deal for Zito on the table?

These may seem like natural questions, but I've heard his policy in the past on these kinds of things and he doesn't discuss specific players or deals.

So I knew going in that I was limited in what I could ask.  I tried to ask almost everything I think AN might want to know.

I also don't ask him things like, so what system do you use to evaluate players?  I just don't think he wants to give away his value system or trade secrets.  And frankly I don't want him too.  I want him to keep most of his evaluation process in secret, so the A's can be the best.

It may sound like I'm dodging certain issues, but that's how I try and approach these things.

And thanks everyone for all the kind notes about the interview.  It was an absolute joy to sit down with him.  He's a fascinating individual and if the A's ever lost him, it'd be a bigger blow than losing McGwire, Giambi, Hudson and Mulder all at once.  

by Tyler Bleszinski on Jan 26, 2005 8:41 PM PST up reply actions  

I completely understand...
...especially with not asking about what systems he's using. As a fan, I'd much rather let Billy do what he does than provide some kind of secret information to the public. He runs my team...why the heck would I want anyone else to even have a clue. Teams are going to find out one way or another. I just want Billy to always be one step ahead of everyone.

Of course, if I was a journalist...

I would be conflicted.

But I'm not. So screw everyone else.

by Sharon on Jan 26, 2005 9:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Questions
Sure, I totally understand.  The Byrnes discussion makes perfect sense.  You don't really know if he'll answer or not, so you allude to it gently to see if he picks up on it.  When he doesn't, you move on.

by iglew on Jan 27, 2005 12:43 AM PST up reply actions  

He's already messed with Byrnes head
From Mychael Urban on Wed.:

'Byrnes had a career year in 2004, setting personal highs in several offensive categories. He's under club control for 2005, but he hasn't yet agreed on contract terms and has been the subject of trade rumors for several weeks.

"I can't do anything about the rumors," Byrnes said. "I'm just getting ready to help whatever team I'm with win games. I hope it's the A's."'

And from Susan Slusser's Captain America piece last week in the Chron:

'Byrnes, who is playing winter ball for Licey in the Dominican Republic, told The Chronicle this week, "It's been all winter, the trade rumors. I'm excited that someone else would want me to come play for them -- this from a guy who didn't think he'd be on anyone's radar, to having some good teams ask about him, it's flattering."

Whatever happens, Byrnes said, it would be nice to have a regular starting job.

"It would be nice for the first time in my career to play every day, and it would be nice to go into spring training knowing that," he said.'

You can tell from the way Billy Beane praises Kielty and from the way Kielty's contract is structured that Byrnes doesn't stand a chance with the Athletics, even if he does make it as far as spring training.  Billy Beane gets an F from me for his people skills.

by Just Me on Jan 27, 2005 7:29 AM PST up reply actions  

Maybe that's the point
Byrnes has always been a better player when there was a fire lit underneath him.  Maybe hell go to Phoenix and kick alot of ass so the A's have no choice but to make Byrnes an everyday starter, or trade him for something more awesome than Cameron.

Even though I love Byrnsie, I'm not really against all those trade rumors, just the Cameron ones.

"I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!" -Brick Tamland, Anchorman

by secret ASian man on Jan 27, 2005 8:04 AM PST up reply actions  

Nice interview Blez!
That was awesome! So much great stuff! BB is a genius and he is humble too. He is most definitely our MVP and I agree that losing him would be like losing every free agent we've ever lost at one time. I'm so excited for April! Go A's!

by A'sfansince1970 on Jan 26, 2005 9:01 PM PST reply actions  

Great job
Just like EF Hutton. When Billy talks, people listen. I've been a die-hard A's fan since 67. Living in NJ all that time sometimes makes it tough. I just love this team!

by Sam Dracula on Jan 27, 2005 8:36 AM PST reply actions  

Eat Your Heart's Out
Other teams fans. To have a GM like Beane is fantastic. The guy is always thinking ahead of the game. I sincerely hope that he stays in Oakland the rest of his career.

by RudiFan on Jan 27, 2005 11:53 AM PST reply actions  

Except for Moneyball (maybe?)...
...that has to be the most comprehensive interview with a GM ever. And for it to be "our guy" and a genius like BB. we are truly blessed.

I loved the "Halloween" analogy, dead on.

"Fear leads to hate, and hate......leads to the Darkside."-Yoda

by Force on Jan 27, 2005 4:33 PM PST reply actions  

One more comment....
Another thing I noticed on re-reading:
BB:  My best move?  Hiring Paul DePodesta.  I mean that.

Shows how DePo's reputation has really taken a beating in the media -- even when his friend and former boss BB compliments him, he feels like he has to say "I mean that."

DePo hasn't been perfect in LA, but you gotta feel for the guy.  He's trying to rebuild a dysfunctional organization, without the kind of money that everyone expects the Dodgers to have, while the local writers from the LA Times use him as their punching bag.  As if the Dodgers were problem-free when he was hired.

MJB

by MJB on Jan 27, 2005 9:50 PM PST reply actions  

the best
thanks a million for this Blez n Billy.
I can't wait for spring training!

by catfish hunter on Jan 28, 2005 12:27 AM PST reply actions  

Great job, Blez...
All three parts were fantastic, but in this one he seemed more human.  Less blah, blah, blah, and some real comments.  I especially like the statements about Paul.  I still think he has a continent sized ego...but god, he is good.

I may not agree with the trades he made...but then compare them with the Cubs possible trade for Sosa.  The A's got several usable young players in their trades.  The Cubs got one major league player and two distant minor leaguers for a man that can hit 30 homeruns with his eyes closed.  It proves that we have the best GM in baseball.

Another great job...Tyler????

by Andy907 on Jan 30, 2005 9:58 PM PST reply actions  

Awesome Interview
Thanks Blez, awesome interview. I cant wait till part III.

Keep posting stuff like this on AN.

by OaklandSports on Feb 1, 2005 8:58 PM PST reply actions  

Correction
I cant wait until April, not part III.

by OaklandSports on Feb 1, 2005 9:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Great interview!
Great job! Clearly showing that Athletics Nation is in the elite as far as sports blogs go (high value over replacement blogs)... does that mean Beane gets a skewed idea of the quality of sports blogging? Heh. But seriously, good to see the way Beane thinks.

by singaporesoxfan on Feb 4, 2005 11:13 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Aperture_logo_small
Community Prospect List #4

Recent FanPosts

Small
Comcast needs two Hotstove shows!
Small
Moneyball Part II: Billy Beane Shocks the World. Again.
Hahaha_small
Let's Make Some Nicknames!
Fubarcloud_small
Wolf being told to spend money
Small
The wRC+ Challenge
Pumpkin_small
Maybe this is a stupid stats question
Small
A's reportedly sign Cespedes
Unknown_small
Is It Really Worth It: Three Veterans Who May Be Playing Oakland Next Year, But Shouldn't Be
Small
Manny's Contract

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Josefav2_small danmerqury

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late