According to Peter Gammons:
I like the idea of Giles patroling the A's infield and it would probably give the A's one of the best infields in the majors, hitting-wise (except Texas, of course). But I guess it depends on the cost. Plus, I think there needs to be more to the offer than just Giles and Dan Meyer.
I do like the idea of getting Kendall by unloading Rhodes contract in a trade of bad contracts. Plus, it makes me worry if Billy was to trade one of The Big Three and then also deal Redman, the A's would have to fill two slots. I guess Duchscherer could come out of the pen, but that also means that you'd be replacing Zito, Hudson or Mulder with Blanton or Duchscherer.
Click on the entry link below to cast your vote for what you'd like to see...
Would you be in favor of trading for Giles at the cost of one of the Big Three?
No (38 votes)
We'd need more than just Giles (72 votes)
It depends, if it's Zito, I'm fine with it (37 votes)
It depends, if it's Hudson, I'm fine with it (3 votes)
It depends, if it's Mulder, I'm fine with it (8 votes)
Yes (9 votes)
167 total votes